植物生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 722-730.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2025.0297 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2025.0297
收稿日期:2025-08-10
接受日期:2025-10-17
出版日期:2026-03-20
发布日期:2026-04-15
通讯作者:
*陈宝明(chenbaom@mail.sysu.edu.cn)基金资助:
ZOU Ji-Kai, WU Jia-Yi, GU Yun-Yi, CHEN Bao-Ming*(
)(
)
Received:2025-08-10
Accepted:2025-10-17
Online:2026-03-20
Published:2026-04-15
Contact:
*CHEN Bao-Ming(chenbaom@mail.sysu.edu.cn)
Supported by:摘要:
丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)与入侵植物的共生能显著影响其对于本地植物的竞争力, 且不同形态的氮对入侵植物竞争力的影响也存在差异。在氮沉降日益严重的背景下, 探讨不同形态的氮添加条件下AMF对入侵植物生长与竞争的影响, 能更好地理解入侵植物对土壤氮形态的适应性。该研究采用同质园种植实验, 选择常见入侵植物白花鬼针草(Bidens alba)与伴生本地植物一点红(Emilia sonchifolia), 设置单独种植与混合种植两种种植方式及3个氮处理(铵态氮添加、硝态氮添加、不加氮)和2个微生物处理(有AMF、无AMF), 通过比较不同处理间植物生物量、菌根生长响应和植物总生物量竞争响应, 探究不同形态氮与AMF对入侵植物白花鬼针草竞争力的影响。结果表明: 所有氮处理条件下AMF均显著提高了本地植物一点红的生物量, 且单种时添加硝态氮和AMF对其生物量的促进作用最大, 说明本地植物一点红存在显著的AMF依赖性, 这种依赖性也受土壤氮形态的影响。无论单种还是混种, AMF对入侵植物白花鬼针草均未表现出显著的影响, 在不添加氮时AMF对白花鬼针草竞争响应的提升作用最大, 但并未发现AMF能够帮助入侵植物白花鬼针草适应不同形态的氮来维持其竞争力, 这可能与其具有较强的菌根自调节能力有关。该研究证明植物-AMF共生作用受氮添加与氮形态的影响, 强调了氮形态影响入侵植物菌根响应的重要性, 有助于加深理解氮沉降背景下AMF对入侵植物生长与竞争的影响。
邹纪开, 吴佳怡, 谷云懿, 陈宝明. 不同形态氮添加与丛枝菌根真菌对外来入侵植物白花鬼针草竞争力的影响. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 722-730. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2025.0297
ZOU Ji-Kai, WU Jia-Yi, GU Yun-Yi, CHEN Bao-Ming. Effects of different nitrogen forms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on competitive ability of invasive alien plant Bidens alba. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2026, 50(3): 722-730. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2025.0297
| 处理 Treatment | 自由度 df | 白花鬼针草 B. alba | 一点红 E. sonchifolia | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单种 Monoculture | 混种 Mixture | 单种 Monoculture | 混种 Mixture | ||||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||
| AMF | 1 | 0.147 | 0.704 | 7.537 | 0.010 | 251.740 | <0.001 | 149.333 | <0.001 |
| N | 2 | 3.235 | 0.054 | 16.456 | <0.001 | 7.060 | 0.003 | 3.501 | 0.043 |
| AMF × N | 2 | 0.501 | 0.611 | 0.985 | 0.385 | 8.259 | 0.001 | 4.041 | 0.028 |
表1 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)和氮处理(N)及其相互作用对白花鬼针草和一点红总生物量影响的方差分析
Table 1 Results of two-way ANOVA for the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and nitrogen (N) on the total biomass of Bidens alba and Emilia sonchifolia
| 处理 Treatment | 自由度 df | 白花鬼针草 B. alba | 一点红 E. sonchifolia | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单种 Monoculture | 混种 Mixture | 单种 Monoculture | 混种 Mixture | ||||||
| F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||
| AMF | 1 | 0.147 | 0.704 | 7.537 | 0.010 | 251.740 | <0.001 | 149.333 | <0.001 |
| N | 2 | 3.235 | 0.054 | 16.456 | <0.001 | 7.060 | 0.003 | 3.501 | 0.043 |
| AMF × N | 2 | 0.501 | 0.611 | 0.985 | 0.385 | 8.259 | 0.001 | 4.041 | 0.028 |
图1 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)和氮添加对白花鬼针草和一点红的总生物量的影响(平均值±标准误, n = 6)。+AMF, 有AMF; -AMF, 无AMF。A, 白花鬼针草单种。B, 白花鬼针草混种。C, 一点红单种。D, 一点红混种。不同小写字母表示不同处理之间差异显著(p < 0.05)。CK, 对照(不添加氮)。
Fig. 1 Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and nitrogen (N) addition on the total biomass of Bidens alba and Emilia sonchifolia (mean ± SE, n = 6). +AMF, AMF treatment; -AMF, non-AMF treatment. A, Monocultured B. alba. B, Mixtured B. alba. C, Monocultured E. sonchifolia. D, Mixtured E. sonchifolia. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). CK, control (no N addition).
| 处理 Treatment | 自由度 df | 单种 Monoculture | 混种 Mixture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | ||
| Species | 1 | 61.268 | <0.001 | 48.516 | <0.001 |
| N | 2 | 3.558 | 0.041 | 1.097 | 0.347 |
| Species × N | 2 | 3.150 | 0.057 | 4.091 | 0.027 |
表2 物种(Species)和氮(N)处理对白花鬼针草和一点红菌根生长响应影响的方差分析
Table 2 Results of two-way ANOVA for the effects of species and nitrogen (N) on mycorrhizal growth response of Bidens alba and Emilia sonchifolia
| 处理 Treatment | 自由度 df | 单种 Monoculture | 混种 Mixture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | ||
| Species | 1 | 61.268 | <0.001 | 48.516 | <0.001 |
| N | 2 | 3.558 | 0.041 | 1.097 | 0.347 |
| Species × N | 2 | 3.150 | 0.057 | 4.091 | 0.027 |
图2 氮添加处理下白花鬼针草和一点红的菌根生长响应(平均值±标准误, n = 6)。A, 单种。B, 混种。不同小写字母表示处理之间差异显著(p ≤ 0.05)。CK, 对照(不添加氮)。
Fig. 2 Mycorrhizal growth response of Bidens alba and Emilia sonchifolia under nitrogen addition treatments (means ± SE, n = 6). A, Monoculture. B, Mixture. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). CK, control (no N addition).
| 处理 Treatment | 自由度 df | 白花鬼针草 B. alba | 一点红 E. sonchifolia | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | ||
| AMF | 1 | 4.295 | 0.047 | 4.113 | 0.052 |
| N | 2 | 2.737 | 0.081 | 1.190 | 0.318 |
| AMF × N | 2 | 2.744 | 0.081 | 1.054 | 0.361 |
表3 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)和氮处理(N)及其交互作用对白花鬼针草和一点红竞争响应的双因素方差分析结果
Table 3 Results of two-way ANOVA for the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), nitrogen addition (N), and their interaction on competitive response of Bidens alba and Emilia sonchifolia
| 处理 Treatment | 自由度 df | 白花鬼针草 B. alba | 一点红 E. sonchifolia | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | ||
| AMF | 1 | 4.295 | 0.047 | 4.113 | 0.052 |
| N | 2 | 2.737 | 0.081 | 1.190 | 0.318 |
| AMF × N | 2 | 2.744 | 0.081 | 1.054 | 0.361 |
图3 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)和氮处理(N)下白花鬼针草和一点红总生物量的竞争响应(平均值±标准误, n = 6)。+AMF, 有AMF; -AMF, 无AMF。A, 白花鬼针草。B, 一点红。不同小写字母表示处理之间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 3 Competitive response of total biomass of Bidens alba and Emilia sonchifolia under arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and nitrogen (N) treatments (means ± SE, n = 6). +AMF, AMF treatment. -AMF, non-AMF treatment. A, Bidens alba. B, Emilia sonchifolia. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
| [1] |
Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI (2004). Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology, 85, 2682-2686.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Ashton IW, Miller AE, Bowman WD, Suding KN (2010). Niche complementarity due to plasticity in resource use: plant partitioning of chemical N forms. Ecology, 91, 3252-3260.
PMID |
| [3] |
Aslani F, Juraimi AS, Ahmad-Hamdani MS, Alam MA, Hasan MM, Hashemi FSG, Bahram M (2019). The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant invasion trajectory. Plant and Soil, 441, 1-14.
DOI |
| [4] |
Bennett AE, Groten K (2022). The costs and benefits of plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal interactions. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 73, 649-672.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Bunn RA, Ramsey PW, Lekberg Y (2015). Do native and invasive plants differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology, 103, 1547-1556.
DOI URL |
| [6] | Chen BX, Sun YF, Han ZH, Huang HK, Zhang HB, Li YK, Zhang GL, Liu WX (2020). Challenges in preventing and controlling invasive alien species in China. Journal of Biosafety, 29(3), 157-163. |
| [陈宝雄, 孙玉芳, 韩智华, 黄宏坤, 张宏斌, 李垚奎, 张国良, 刘万学 (2020). 我国外来入侵生物防控现状、问题和对策. 生物安全学报, 29(3), 157-163.] | |
| [7] | Chen DQ (2012). Ecology of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Associations in Flaveria bidentis, a Invasive Alien Plant. Master degree dissertation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing. |
| [陈冬青 (2012). 外来入侵植物黄顶菊的菌根生态学研究. 硕士学位论文, 中国农业科学院, 北京.] | |
| [8] |
Chen EJ, Liao HX, Chen BM, Peng SL (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are a double-edged sword in plant invasion controlled by phosphorus concentration. New Phytologist, 226, 295-300.
DOI PMID |
| [9] |
Chen WB, Chen BM (2019). Considering the preferences for nitrogen forms by invasive plants: a case study from a hydroponic culture experiment. Weed Research, 59, 49-57.
DOI |
| [10] | Chen YL, Chen BD, Liu L, Hu YJ, Xu TL, Zhang X (2014). The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil nitrogen cycling. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 4807-4815. |
| [陈永亮, 陈保冬, 刘蕾, 胡亚军, 徐天乐, 张莘 (2014). 丛枝菌根真菌在土壤氮素循环中的作用. 生态学报, 34, 4807-4815.] | |
| [11] |
Cheng JK, Yue MF, Yang HR, Chen BM, Xin GR (2019). Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi help the native species Bidens biternata resist the invasion of Bidens alba? Plant and Soil, 444, 443-455.
DOI |
| [12] |
Enders M, Havemann F, Ruland F, Bernard-Verdier M, Catford JA, Gómez-Aparicio L, Haider S, Heger T, Kueffer C, Kühn I, Meyerson LA, Musseau C, Novoa A, Ricciardi A, Sagouis A, et al. (2020). A conceptual map of invasion biology: integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29, 978-991.
DOI PMID |
| [13] |
Harrison KA, Bol R, Bardgett RD (2007). Preferences for different nitrogen forms by coexisting plant species and soil microbes. Ecology, 88, 989-999.
PMID |
| [14] |
Hawkes CV, Wren IF, Herman DJ, Firestone MK (2005). Plant invasion alters nitrogen cycling by modifying the soil nitrifying community. Ecology Letters, 8, 976-985.
DOI PMID |
| [15] | Huang D, Sang WG, Zhu L, Song YY, Wang JP (2010). Effects of nitrogen and carbon addition and arbuscular mycorrhiza on alien invasive plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21, 3056-3062. |
| [黄栋, 桑卫国, 朱丽, 宋迎迎, 王晋萍 (2010). 氮碳添加和丛枝菌根对外来入侵植物豚草的影响. 应用生态学报, 21, 3056-3062.] | |
| [16] | Huang P, Shen FY, Abbas A, Wang H, Du YZ, Du DL, Hussain S, Javed T, Alamri S (2022). Effects of different nitrogen forms and competitive treatments on the growth and antioxidant system of Wedelia trilobata and Wedelia chinensis under high nitrogen concentrations. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 851099. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.851099. |
| [17] |
Huangfu CH, Li HY, Chen XW, Liu HM, Wang H, Yang DL (2016). Response of an invasive plant, Flaveria bidentis, to nitrogen addition: a test of form-preference uptake. Biological Invasions, 18, 3365-3380.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Huangfu CH, Li KL, Hui DF (2019). Influences of plant interspecific competition and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on nitrogen form preference of an invasive plant. Biogeochemistry, 145, 295-313.
DOI |
| [19] |
Kahiluoto H, Ketoja E, Vestberg M (2000). Creation of a non-mycorrhizal control for a bioassay of AM effectiveness. Mycorrhiza, 9, 241-258.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
Li QW, Zhang XY, Liang JF, Gao JQ, Xu XL, Yu FH (2021). High nitrogen uptake and utilization contribute to the dominance of invasive Spartina alterniflora over native Phragmites australis. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 57, 1007-1013.
DOI |
| [21] | Li X, Zhang JL (2008). Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to N uptake by plants. Journal of Shanxi Datong University (Natural Science Edition), 24(6), 75-78. |
| [李侠, 张俊伶 (2008). 丛枝菌根真菌对氮素的吸收作用和机制. 山西大同大学学报(自然科学版), 24(6), 75-78.] | |
| [22] | Liao HX, Zhou T, Chen BM, Chen EJ, Zhang HJ, Peng SL (2021). Ecological control of exotic invasive plants. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 60(4), 1-11. |
| [廖慧璇, 周婷, 陈宝明, 陈恩健, 张海杰, 彭少麟 (2021). 外来入侵植物的生态控制. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 60(4), 1-11.] | |
| [23] |
Lin GG, McCormack ML, Guo DL (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on plant competition and community structure. Journal of Ecology, 103, 1224-1232.
DOI URL |
| [24] | Lin QW, Xiao C, Ma JS (2022). A dataset on catalogue of alien plants in China. Biodiversity Science, 30(5), 110-117. |
| [林秦文, 肖翠, 马金双 (2022). 中国外来植物数据集. 生物多样性, 30(5), 110-117.] | |
| [25] | Liu YJ, Huang W, Yang Q, Zheng YL, Li SP, Wu H, Ju RT, Sun Y, Ding JQ (2022). Research advances of plant invasion ecology over the past 10 years. Biodiversity Science, 30, 22438. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022438. |
| [刘艳杰, 黄伟, 杨强, 郑玉龙, 黎绍鹏, 吴昊, 鞠瑞亭, 孙燕, 丁建清 (2022). 近十年植物入侵生态学重要研究进展. 生物多样性, 30, 22438. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022438.] | |
| [26] | Loch-Temzelides T (2021). Walrasian equilibrium behavior in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118, 1-6. |
| [27] | Luo JJ, Gao YM, Feng WW, Liu MC, Qu B, Zhang C, Feng YL (2022). Stronger ability to absorb nitrate and associated transporters in the invasive plant Xanthium strumarium compared with its native congener. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 198, 104851. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104851. |
| [28] | McKane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Rastetter EB, Fry B, Giblin AE, Kielland K, Kwiatkowski BL, Laundre JA, Murray G (2002). Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature, 415, 68-71. |
| [29] |
Ngwene B, Gabriel E, George E (2013). Influence of different mineral nitrogen sources (NO3--N vs. NH4+-N) on arbuscular mycorrhiza development and N transfer in a Glomus intraradices-cowpea symbiosis. Mycorrhiza, 23, 107-117.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
Read DJ, Perez-Moreno J (2003). Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems—A journey towards relevance? New Phytologist, 157, 475-492.
DOI PMID |
| [31] |
Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2004). Soil biota facilitate exotic Acer invasions in Europe and North America. Ecological Applications, 14, 1737-1745.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
Shannon-Firestone S, Reynolds HL, Phillips RP, Flory SL, Yannarell A (2015). The role of ammonium oxidizing communities in mediating effects of an invasive plant on soil nitrification. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 90, 266-274.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
Shi JC, Wang XL, Wang ET (2023). Mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant growth and stress adaptation: from genes to ecosystems. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 74, 569-607.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
Smith FA, Smith SE (2013). How useful is the mutualism-parasitism continuum of arbuscular mycorrhizal functioning? Plant and Soil, 363, 7-18.
DOI URL |
| [35] |
Song MH, Zheng LL, Suding KN, Yin TF, Yu FH (2015). Plasticity in nitrogen form uptake and preference in response to long-term nitrogen fertilization. Plant and Soil, 394, 215-224.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
Sun DS, Yang XP, Wang Y, Fan Y, Ding PC, Song XE, Yuan XY, Yang XF (2022). Stronger mutualistic interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi help Asteraceae invaders outcompete the phylogenetically related natives. New Phytologist, 236, 1487-1496.
DOI URL |
| [37] |
Sun SM, Chen JX, Feng WW, Zhang C, Huang K, Guan M, Sun JK, Liu MC, Feng YL (2021). Plant strategies for nitrogen acquisition and their effects on exotic plant invasions. Biodiversity Science, 29, 72-80.
DOI URL |
| [孙思邈, 陈吉欣, 冯炜炜, 张昶, 黄凯, 管铭, 孙建坤, 刘明超, 冯玉龙 (2021). 植物氮形态利用策略及对外来植物入侵性的影响. 生物多样性, 29, 72-80.] | |
| [38] | Wang CY, Zhou JW, Liu J, Jiang K (2017). Differences in functional traits between invasive and native Amaranthus species under different forms of N deposition. The Science of Nature, 104, 59. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-017-1482-4. |
| [39] | Wang SS, Ye HH, Yang CF, Zhang Y, Pu JW, Ren YH, Xie K, Wang LX, Zeng DC, He HQ, Ji HY, Herrera-Estrella LR, Xu GH, Chen AQ (2025). OsNLP3 and OsPHR2 orchestrate direct and mycorrhizal pathways for nitrate uptake by regulating NAR2.1-NRT2s complexes in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122, e2416345122. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2416345122. |
| [40] |
Wei HJ, Chen BM (2023). Competition shifts the advantage of the invasive plant Bidens alba to a disadvantage under soil ammonia nitrogen. Biological Invasions, 25, 2277-2292.
DOI |
| [41] |
Xiao R, Qiu YP, Tao JJ, Zhang XL, Chen HH, Reberg-Horton SC, Shi W, Shew HD, Zhang Y, Hu SJ (2020). Biological controls over the abundances of terrestrial ammonia oxidizers. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29, 384-399.
DOI |
| [42] |
Xie K, Ren YH, Chen AQ, Yang CF, Zheng QS, Chen J, Wang DS, Li YT, Hu SJ, Xu GH (2022). Plant nitrogen nutrition: the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Plant Physiology, 269, 153591.
DOI URL |
| [43] |
Xu LJ, Jiang XL, Hao ZP, Li T, Wu ZX, Chen BD (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhiza improves plant adaptation to phosphorus deficiency through regulating the expression of genes relevant to carbon and phosphorus metabolism. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41, 815-825.
DOI |
|
[徐丽娇, 姜雪莲, 郝志鹏, 李涛, 吴照祥, 陈保冬 (2017). 丛枝菌根通过调节碳磷代谢相关基因的表达增强植物对低磷胁迫的适应性. 植物生态学报, 41, 815-825.]
DOI |
|
| [44] |
Yang JT, Pan YJ, Chang CL, Liu YJ (2024). Effects of native plant-soil microbe interaction on plant invasion. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 48, 1547-1560.
DOI URL |
|
[杨佳婷, 潘应骥, 常春玲, 刘艳杰 (2024). 本地植物与土壤微生物互作对植物入侵影响的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 48, 1547-1560.]
DOI |
|
| [45] | Yin JL, Zhang XY, Yan J, Li Q, Jia YY, Zhang FJ, Wan FH (2015). The feedback of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the competition between Flaveria bidentis and cotton. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24, 1132-1136. |
|
[殷吉林, 张晓亚, 闫静, 李乔, 贾月月, 张风娟, 万方浩 (2015). AMF对入侵植物黄顶菊与棉花竞争生长的反馈作用. 生态环境学报, 24, 1132-1136.]
DOI |
|
| [46] | Yoshida LC, Allen EB (2004). 15N uptake by mycorrhizal native and invasive plants from a N-eutrophied shrubland:a greenhouse experiment. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 39, 243-248. |
| [47] |
Zhang FJ, Li Q, Chen FX, Xu HY, Wan FH (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi facilitate growth and competitive ability of an exotic species Flaveria bidentis. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 115, 275-284.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 马云瀚, 鲁显楷, 贾永霞, 朱晓敏. 长期氮沉降改变热带森林土壤木质素酚积累的调控路径[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [2] | 何青, 袁旭东, 任博申, 冯治洋, 鲁梦珍, 林巧玲, 姜庆虎, 杨林森, 余辉亮, 姚辉, 杨敬元, 刘峰, 江明喜. 一年蓬入侵对亚高山泥炭湿地植物群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(4): 895-906. |
| [3] | 周春菡, 熊智诚, 杨明新, 史海兰, 周亚星, 唐玉, 张静, 纪宝明, 代心灵. 黄河源园区高寒湿地菌根真菌群落特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 625-638. |
| [4] | 姜庆宏, 丁露, 王哲, 郑春丽, 冯昭绰. 丛枝菌根真菌与不同功能细菌联用对苜蓿的促生作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 774-788. |
| [5] | 任曦彤, 李颖, 张雨, 熊胡安赫, 张蕊科, 祁珊珊, 戴志聪, 杜道林. 丛枝菌根真菌与凋落物互作有助于加拿大一枝黄花应对营养胁迫[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 710-721. |
| [6] | 马建辉, 童鑫, 张思榕, 毛子昆, 秦俊, 马克平. 菌根真菌生理生态功能研究进展及展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 498-514. |
| [7] | 王海浪, 付伟, 伍松林, 陈保冬. 丛枝菌根真菌生态功能及群落调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 515-535. |
| [8] | 秦斐斐, 唐朝辉, 司彤, 慈敦伟. 盐碱耐受型和敏感型花生生长发育及根际土壤特性对丛枝菌根真菌的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 742-759. |
| [9] | 何正嘉, 曾歆然, 王琳影, 薛昕宇, 苏钦泽, 李宇, 张寅杰, 吴辉煌, 陈成聪, 吴良泉, 魏安妮, 仇云鹏, 郭梨锦. 茶园丛枝菌根真菌群落和土壤有机碳对镁肥的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 700-709. |
| [10] | 段世龙, 余成瑾, 许心垚, 冯固, 谢贤安, 张林. 植物-丛枝菌根真菌-细菌连续体及其维持机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 600-611. |
| [11] | 江康威, 吕程, 王亚菲, 李宏, 张芷晴, 王雨, 张青青, 吐尔逊娜依•热依木. 放牧干扰下丛枝菌根真菌群落对土壤多功能性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 685-699. |
| [12] | 何堂庆, 王变变, 曹鑫鑫, 张康成, 汪晓东, 王浩, 白彤硕, 赵叶新, 张艺, 王益, 仇云鹏, 胡水金. 半干旱草地植物和丛枝菌根真菌群落对长期降水增加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 674-684. |
| [13] | 魏莉, 王鹏森, 刘珊, 樊锐, 黄楠, 张建国, 其美拉姆, 苟扬, 刘沫含, 黄婷, 周冀琼. 丛枝菌根真菌对豆禾混播植物垂直生态位养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 760-773. |
| [14] | 张诚航, 卫星, 吴纯泽, 王裕尧, 李浩楠. 大气还原态氮干湿沉降下水曲柳和兴安落叶松菌根化苗木生长响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 649-659. |
| [15] | 王梦雪, 胡明艳, 储诚进, 陈阳, 罗文启, 马子龙. 亚热带森林不同菌根真菌树种叶片和细根的碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 334-343. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19