植物生态学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 465-476.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.026 cstr: 32100.14.j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.026
所属专题: 青藏高原植物生态学:植物-土壤-微生物; 碳储量
收稿日期:2006-12-12
接受日期:2007-07-10
出版日期:2008-12-12
发布日期:2008-03-30
作者简介:E-mail: wujg@craes.org.cn基金资助:Received:2006-12-12
Accepted:2007-07-10
Online:2008-12-12
Published:2008-03-30
摘要:
测定分析了祁连山高寒草甸、山地森林和干草原土壤中微生物活性、生物量碳氮含量。结果显示:就土壤微生物生物量碳含量,森林比干草原和高寒草甸中分别高60%和120%以上,干草原比高寒草甸中高40%以上(p<0.05)。就土壤微生物生物量氮含量,0~5 cm土层,森林比高寒草甸和干草原中分别高64%和111%以上,高寒草甸比干草原中高29%;5~15 cm土层,森林比干草原和高寒草甸中分别高7%和191%以上,干草原比高寒草甸中高171% 以上(p<0.05)。森林和干草原中土壤微生物生物量碳比例比高寒草甸中高32%以上,0~5和5~15 cm土层,森林和干草原中土壤微生物生物量氮比例比高寒草甸中高150%以上(p<0.05)。就土壤微生物活性,0~5和5~15 cm土层,森林和高寒草甸比干草原中高26%以上;15~35 cm土层,森林比干草原和高寒草甸中高28%以上 (p<0.05)。土壤微生物生物量碳氮含量与有机碳含量及微生物生物量氮含量和比例与微生物生物量碳含量和比例呈现正相关(r2>0.30,p<0.000 1)。土壤微生物生物量氮含量、微生物生物量碳氮含量比例、微生物活性与土壤pH值呈显著负相关,土壤微生物生物量碳氮含量及其比例、微生物活性与土壤湿度呈正相关。说明祁连山3种生态系统土壤中微生物生物量和活性受气候要素、植被、有机碳、pH值和湿度等因素的共同影响。
吴建国, 艾丽. 祁连山3种典型生态系统土壤微生物活性和生物量碳氮含量. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 465-476. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.026
WU Jian-Guo, AI Li. SOIL MICROBIAL ACTIVITY AND BIOMASS C AND N CONTENT IN THREE TYPICAL ECOSYSTEMS IN QI LIAN MOUNTAINS, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(2): 465-476. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.026
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土壤类型 Soil type | 土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | pH | CaCO3 (%) | 全磷 Total P (%) | 全钾 Total K (%) | 土壤湿度 Soil water content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高寒草甸 Alpine meadows | 高寒草甸土 Alpine meadow soil | 0~5 | 6.3 | 0.2 | 0.11 | 2.2 | 24 |
| 5~15 | 6.5 | 0.1 | 0.10 | 2.4 | 26 | ||
| 15~35 | 6.6 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 2.6 | 28 | ||
山地森林 Dragon spruce forest | 灰色森林土 Mountain gray cinnamon soil | 0~5 | 7.0 | 0.5 | 0.20 | 2.6 | 23 |
| 5~15 | 7.1 | 0.8 | 0.10 | 3.0 | 24 | ||
| 15~35 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 0.07 | 2.5 | 23 | ||
干草原 Steppe | 山地栗钙土 Mountain kastanozem | 0~5 | 8.1 | 7.3 | 0.14 | 2.5 | 22 |
| 5~15 | 8.3 | 8.2 | 0.12 | 2.4 | 23 | ||
| 15~35 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 0.11 | 2.5 | 21 |
表1 样地土壤的基本性质
Table 1 Basic characters of soil
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土壤类型 Soil type | 土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | pH | CaCO3 (%) | 全磷 Total P (%) | 全钾 Total K (%) | 土壤湿度 Soil water content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高寒草甸 Alpine meadows | 高寒草甸土 Alpine meadow soil | 0~5 | 6.3 | 0.2 | 0.11 | 2.2 | 24 |
| 5~15 | 6.5 | 0.1 | 0.10 | 2.4 | 26 | ||
| 15~35 | 6.6 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 2.6 | 28 | ||
山地森林 Dragon spruce forest | 灰色森林土 Mountain gray cinnamon soil | 0~5 | 7.0 | 0.5 | 0.20 | 2.6 | 23 |
| 5~15 | 7.1 | 0.8 | 0.10 | 3.0 | 24 | ||
| 15~35 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 0.07 | 2.5 | 23 | ||
干草原 Steppe | 山地栗钙土 Mountain kastanozem | 0~5 | 8.1 | 7.3 | 0.14 | 2.5 | 22 |
| 5~15 | 8.3 | 8.2 | 0.12 | 2.4 | 23 | ||
| 15~35 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 0.11 | 2.5 | 21 |
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | 土壤有机碳含量 SOC content (g·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 土壤全氮含量 Total soil N content (g·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 土壤碳氮比 Soil C∶N | 标准差 Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草原Steppe | 0~5 | 27.35a | 5.32 | 2.31a | 0.40 | 11.81a | 0.73 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 101.26b | 5.41 | 4.26b | 0.11 | 23.76b | 1.11 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 70.44c | 6.23 | 5.07c | 0.35 | 13.92c | 1.26 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 5~15 | 23.73a | 2.13 | 2.27a | 0.11 | 10.45a | 1.14 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 91.09b | 6.51 | 3.35b | 0.18 | 27.20b | 2.05 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 55.90c | 5.57 | 4.21c | 0.37 | 13.25c | 0.44 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 15~35 | 23.51a | 1.51 | 2.41a | 0.21 | 9.79a | 0.77 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 81.48b | 5.40 | 2.67a | 0.33 | 30.78b | 3.84 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 47.70c | 2.14 | 3.86b | 0.07 | 12.35c | 0.42 |
表2 不同植被的土壤有机碳和全氮含量
Table 2 Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total N content under different vegetation types
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | 土壤有机碳含量 SOC content (g·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 土壤全氮含量 Total soil N content (g·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 土壤碳氮比 Soil C∶N | 标准差 Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草原Steppe | 0~5 | 27.35a | 5.32 | 2.31a | 0.40 | 11.81a | 0.73 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 101.26b | 5.41 | 4.26b | 0.11 | 23.76b | 1.11 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 70.44c | 6.23 | 5.07c | 0.35 | 13.92c | 1.26 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 5~15 | 23.73a | 2.13 | 2.27a | 0.11 | 10.45a | 1.14 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 91.09b | 6.51 | 3.35b | 0.18 | 27.20b | 2.05 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 55.90c | 5.57 | 4.21c | 0.37 | 13.25c | 0.44 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 15~35 | 23.51a | 1.51 | 2.41a | 0.21 | 9.79a | 0.77 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 81.48b | 5.40 | 2.67a | 0.33 | 30.78b | 3.84 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 47.70c | 2.14 | 3.86b | 0.07 | 12.35c | 0.42 |
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | 微生量生物量碳含量 SMBC content (mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 微生物生物量氮含量 SMBN content (mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 微生物生物量C∶N Ratio of SMBC and N content | 标准差 Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草原Steppe | 0~5 | 665.06a | 220.88 | 55.96a | 30.74 | 17.43a | 14.17 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 1206.89b | 306.21 | 118.13b | 13.80 | 10.45a | 3.63 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 428.15c | 231.21 | 72.00c | 37.68 | 7.09b | 3.49 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 5~15 | 652.84a | 158.74 | 60.48a | 24.53 | 12.92a | 6.07 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 1073.56b | 165.03 | 64.95b | 15.92 | 17.81a | 7.08 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 466.92c | 233.77 | 22.31c | 14.00 | 39.19b | 27.84 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 15~35 | 387.24a | 154.95 | 22.03a | 9.03 | 27.17a | 26.94 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 732.52b | 98.64 | 21.49a | 12.45 | 43.62b | 22.29 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 191.23c | 109.02 | 19.58a | 9.22 | 12.10c | 9.05 |
表3 不同植被下土壤微生物生物量碳氮含量
Table 3 Soil microbial biomass C and N content under different vegetation types
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth (cm) | 微生量生物量碳含量 SMBC content (mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 微生物生物量氮含量 SMBN content (mg·kg-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 微生物生物量C∶N Ratio of SMBC and N content | 标准差 Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草原Steppe | 0~5 | 665.06a | 220.88 | 55.96a | 30.74 | 17.43a | 14.17 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 1206.89b | 306.21 | 118.13b | 13.80 | 10.45a | 3.63 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 428.15c | 231.21 | 72.00c | 37.68 | 7.09b | 3.49 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 5~15 | 652.84a | 158.74 | 60.48a | 24.53 | 12.92a | 6.07 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 1073.56b | 165.03 | 64.95b | 15.92 | 17.81a | 7.08 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 466.92c | 233.77 | 22.31c | 14.00 | 39.19b | 27.84 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 15~35 | 387.24a | 154.95 | 22.03a | 9.03 | 27.17a | 26.94 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 732.52b | 98.64 | 21.49a | 12.45 | 43.62b | 22.29 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 191.23c | 109.02 | 19.58a | 9.22 | 12.10c | 9.05 |
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth(cm) | 土壤微生物生物量碳比例 Ratio of SMBC (%) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 土壤微生物生物量氮比例 Ratio of SMBN (%) | 标准差 Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草原Steppe | 0~5 | 2.59a | 1.20 | 2.58a | 1.87 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 2.75a | 0.72 | 2.66b | 1.23 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 1.67b | 0.80 | 0.92c | 0.44 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 5~15 | 1.20a | 0.33 | 2.78a | 0.40 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 1.19a | 0.26 | 1.96b | 0.62 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 0.90b | 0.16 | 0.78c | 0.43 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 15~35 | 0.62a | 0.37 | 1.47a | 0.91 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 0.86b | 0.50 | 0.54b | 0.38 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 0.41c | 0.27 | 0.51c | 0.27 |
表4 土壤微生物生物量碳氮含量占土壤有机碳和全氮含量比例
Table 4 Ratio of soil microbial biomass C and N
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth(cm) | 土壤微生物生物量碳比例 Ratio of SMBC (%) | 标准差 Standard deviation | 土壤微生物生物量氮比例 Ratio of SMBN (%) | 标准差 Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干草原Steppe | 0~5 | 2.59a | 1.20 | 2.58a | 1.87 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 2.75a | 0.72 | 2.66b | 1.23 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 1.67b | 0.80 | 0.92c | 0.44 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 5~15 | 1.20a | 0.33 | 2.78a | 0.40 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 1.19a | 0.26 | 1.96b | 0.62 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 0.90b | 0.16 | 0.78c | 0.43 | |
| 干草原Steppe | 15~35 | 0.62a | 0.37 | 1.47a | 0.91 |
| 山地森林Dragon spruce forest | 0.86b | 0.50 | 0.54b | 0.38 | |
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 0.41c | 0.27 | 0.51c | 0.27 |
图2 土壤有机碳含量和微生物生物量碳氮含量(a)、全氮和微生物生物量碳氮含量(b)、土壤微生物生物量碳和土壤微生物生物量氮(c)、土壤微生物生物量碳比例和土壤微生物量氮比例(d)、土壤碳氮比和土壤微生物生物量碳氮比(e)关系
Fig.2 Relationship between the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) and SMB C or N (a),the content of soil N and SMB C or N (b), the content of SMB C and N (c), the ratio of SMB C and N (d), soil C∶N and SMB C∶N (e)
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth (0~5 cm) | 土层深度 Soil depth (5~15 cm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤微生物活性 Soil microbial activity (10-6 g CO2-C·g-1 soil·h-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation (10-6) | 土壤微生物活性 Soil microbial activity (10-6 g CO2-C·g-1 soil·h-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation (10-6) | 土壤微生物活性 Soil microbial activity (10-6 g CO2-C·g-1 soil·h-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation (10-6) | |||
| 干草原Dry grassland | 7.50aA | 2.33 | 10.87bA | 2.07 | 7.07cA | 1.95 | ||
| 山地森林Dragon forest | 18.25aB | 0.60 | 13.90bB | 1.35 | 9.04cB | 5.43 | ||
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 17.18aB | 2.66 | 13.73bB | 2.79 | 6.90cB | 1.41 | ||
表5 不同植被下土壤微生物活性
Table 5 Soil microbial activity under different vegetation types
| 植被类型 Vegetation type | 土层深度 Soil depth (0~5 cm) | 土层深度 Soil depth (5~15 cm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤微生物活性 Soil microbial activity (10-6 g CO2-C·g-1 soil·h-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation (10-6) | 土壤微生物活性 Soil microbial activity (10-6 g CO2-C·g-1 soil·h-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation (10-6) | 土壤微生物活性 Soil microbial activity (10-6 g CO2-C·g-1 soil·h-1) | 标准差 Standard deviation (10-6) | |||
| 干草原Dry grassland | 7.50aA | 2.33 | 10.87bA | 2.07 | 7.07cA | 1.95 | ||
| 山地森林Dragon forest | 18.25aB | 0.60 | 13.90bB | 1.35 | 9.04cB | 5.43 | ||
| 高寒草甸Alpine meadows | 17.18aB | 2.66 | 13.73bB | 2.79 | 6.90cB | 1.41 | ||
图3 土壤有机碳含量和微生物活性(a)、全氮和土壤微生物量活性(b)、土壤微生物碳含量和微生物量活性(c)、土壤微生物氮含量和土壤微生物活性(d)的关系
Fig.3 Relationship between the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil microbe activity (a), the content of soil N and soil microbe activity (b), the content of SMB C and soil microbe activity (c), the content of SMB N and soil microbe activity (d)
| [1] | Allen AS, Schlesinger WH (2004). Nutrient limitations to soil microbial biomass and activity in loblolly pine forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 581-589. |
| [2] | Alvarez CR, Alvarez R, Grigera MS, Lavado RS (1998). Associations between organic matter fractions and the active soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30, 767-773. |
| [3] | Anderson JPE, Domash KH (1980). Quantities of plant nutrients in the microbial biomass of selected soils. Soil Science, 130, 211-216. |
| [4] | Balota EL, Colozzi-Filho A, Andrade DS, Dick RP (2003). Microbial biomass in soils under different tillage and crop rotation systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 38, 15-20. |
| [5] | Bao SD (鲍士旦) (2000). The Analysis of Agriculture Soil Chemistry (土壤农化分析). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 14-61. (in Chinese) |
| [6] | Bardgett RD, Shine A (1999). Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in the temperature grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 317-321. |
| [7] | Bauhus J, Pare D, Cote L (1998). Effects of tree species, stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a southern boreal forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30, 1077-1089. |
| [8] | Beck T, Joergenson RG, Kandeler E, Makeschin F, Nuss E, Oberholzer HR, Scheu S (1997). An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29, 1023-1032. |
| [9] | Bonito GM, Coleman DC, Haines BL, Cabrera ML (2003). Can nitrogen budgets explain differences in soil nitrogen mineralization rates of forest stands along an elevation gradient. Forest Ecology and Management, 176, 563-574. |
| [10] | Chen CR, Xu ZH, Hughes JM (2002). Effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil nitrogen pools and microbial properties in a hoop pine (Araucaria cunninghamii) plantation in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 36, 276-283. |
| [11] | Chen GC (陈国潮), He ZL (何振立), Huang CY (黄昌勇)(2002). Turnover of microbial biomass C in red soils and its significance in soil fertility evaluation. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 39, 152-160. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [12] | Fauci MF, Dick RP (1994). Soil microbial dynamics: short and long term effects of inorganic and organic nitrogen. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 58, 801-806. |
| [13] | Iyyemperumala K, Israela DW, Shi W (2007). Soil microbial biomass, activity and potential nitrogen mineralization in a pasture: impact of stock camping activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 149-157. |
| [14] | Jackson RB, Schenk HJ, JobbáGy EG, Canadell J, Colello GD, Dickinson RE, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Heimann M, Kicklighter DW, Kleidon A, Neilson RP, Parton WJ, Sala OE, Sykes MT (2000). Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models. Ecological Applications, 10, 470-483. |
| [15] | Jenkinson DS, Brookes PC, Powlson DS (2004). Measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 5-7. |
| [16] | Jiang PK (姜培坤), Zhou GM (周国模) (2003). Change in soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen under eroded red soil by vegetation recovery. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 17, 112-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [17] | Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000). The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications, 10, 423-436. |
| [18] | Li F (李阜), Yu ZN (喻子牛), He SJ (何绍江) (1996). The Methods of Agriculture Microbiology (农业微生物学实验技术). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 82-83. (in Chinese) |
| [19] | Li TJ (李天杰), Zheng YS (郑应顺), Wang Y (王云)(1997). Soil Geography (土壤地理学). Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [20] | Li XZ (李香真), Qu QH (曲秋皓)(2002). Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in Mongolian grassland. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 39, 97-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [21] | Lovell RD, Jarvis SC (1998). Soil microbial biomass and activity in soil from different grassland management treatments stored under controlled conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30, 2077-2085. |
| [22] | Luizło RCC, Luizło FJ, Paiva RQ, Monteiro TF, Sousa LS, Kruijt B (2004). Variation of carbon and nitrogen cycling processes along a topographic gradient in a Amazonian forest. Global Change Biology, 10, 592-600. |
| [23] | Menyailo OV, Hungate BA, Zech W (2002). The effect of single tree species on soil microbial activities related to C and N cycling in the Siberian artificial afforestation experiment. Plant and Soil, 242, 183-196. |
| [24] | Merilä P, Strummer R, Fritze H (2002). Soil microbial activity and community structure along a primary succession transect on the land-uplift coast in western Finland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34, 1647-1654. |
| [25] | Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger G (1982). Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 298, 156-159. |
| [26] | Prescott CE, Chappell NH, Vesterdal L (2000). Nitrogen turnover in forest floors of coastal Douglas-fir at sites differing in soil nitrogen capital. Ecology, 81, 1878-1886. |
| [27] | Scholes MC, Powlson D, Tian GL (1997). Input control of organic matter dynamics. Geoderma, 79, 25-47. |
| [28] | Smith JL, Halvorson JJ, Bolton H Jr (2002). Soil properties and microbial activity across a 500 m elevation gradient in a semi-arid environment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34, 1749-1757. |
| [29] | Sparling GP (1992). Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of change in soil organic matter. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 30, 195-207. |
| [30] | Stenberg B, Johansson M, Pell M, Sjodahl-Svensson K, Stenstrom J, Torstensson L (1998). Microbial biomass and activities in soil as affected by frozen and cold storage. Soil Boilogy and Biochemistry, 30, 393-402. |
| [31] | Sun HL (孙鸿烈), Zheng D (郑度) (1998). Produce, Evaluation and Development for the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Environmental (青藏高原形成、演化与发展). Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou. (in Chinese) |
| [32] | Tang GY (唐国勇), Huang DY (黄道友), Tong CL (童成立), Zhang WJ (张文菊), Xiao HA (肖和艾), Su YR (苏以荣), Wu JS (吴金水) (2006). Characteristics of soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in hilly red soil region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 17, 429-433. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [33] | Tang MC (汤懋苍), Cheng GD (程国栋) (1998). Modern Climate Change in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Its Effects on Environment (青藏高原近代气候变化及其对环境的影响). Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou. (in Chinese) |
| [34] | Tate RL III (2000). Soil Microbiology 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York. |
| [35] | Tu C, Rustaino JB, Hu S (2006). Soil microbial biomass and activity in organic tomato farming systems: effects of organic inputs and straw mulching. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 247-255. |
| [36] | Vanlauwe B, Nwoke OC, Sanginga N, Merckx R (1999). Evaluation of methods for measuring microbial biomass C and N and relationships between microbial biomass and soil organic matter particle size classes in West-African soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 1071-1082. |
| [37] | Wang JY (王金叶), Chang XX (常学向), Ge SL (葛双兰), Miao YX (苗毓新), Chang ZQ (常宗强), Zhang H (张虎) (2001). The vertical distribution of temperature and precipitation on the northern slop in Qi Lian Mountains. Journal of Northwest Forestry College (西北林学院学报), 16(Suppl.), 1-3. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [38] | Warder DAA (1992). Comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biological Reviews, 67, 321-356. |
| [39] | Wen QX (文启孝)(1984). The Methods of Soil Organic Matter (土壤有机质研究法). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 301-302. (in Chinese) |
| [40] | Xie ZM (谢正苗), Ka LD (卡里德), Huang CY (黄昌勇), Yu JY (俞尽炎)(2000). Effects of cadmium, lead and zinc onmicrobial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in red soil. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science (植物营养与肥料学报), 6, 69-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [41] | Xiong Y (熊毅), Li QK (李庆逵) (1990). Chinese Soil (中国土壤). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [42] | Zak DR, Tilman D, Parmenter RR, Rice CW, Fisher RM, Vose J, Milchunas D, Martin CW (1994). Plant production and soil microorganisms in late-successional ecosystems: a continental-scale study. Ecology, 75, 2333-2347. |
| [43] | Zhang DX (张电学), Han ZQ (韩志卿), Li DP (李东坡), Liu W (刘微), Gao SG (高书国), Hou DJ (侯东军), Chang LS (常连生) (2005). Effects of returning maize straw into field on dynamic change of soil microbial biomass C, N, P under different promoted decay condition. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 16, 1903-1908. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [44] | Zhang H (张虎), Wen YL (温娅丽), Ma L (马力), Chang ZQ (常宗强), Wang JY (王金叶) (2001). The characterizers of climate and vertical climate zone classification in Qi Lian Mountain. Journal of Mountain Science (山地学报), 19, 497-503. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 吴光进, 郭垚鑫, 任成杰, 王俊, 岳明, 赵发珠. 秦岭北麓不同植被类型土壤有机碳含量分布及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-. |
| [2] | 何正嘉, 曾歆然, 王琳影, 薛昕宇, 苏钦泽, 李宇, 张寅杰, 吴辉煌, 陈成聪, 吴良泉, 魏安妮, 仇云鹏, 郭梨锦. 茶园丛枝菌根真菌群落和土壤有机碳对镁肥的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 700-709. |
| [3] | 李文竹, 栾军伟, 邸雅平, 王一, 聂秀青, 刘世荣. 模拟干旱对暖温带锐齿槲栎林菌根介导下土壤酶活性和土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 660-673. |
| [4] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [5] | 范亚冉, 夏少攀, 于冰冰, 朱紫琪, 杨威, 范豫川, 刘晓雨, 张旭辉, 郑聚锋. 大气CO2浓度升高和增温对土壤有机碳库积累、分子组成和结构稳定性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1053-1069. |
| [6] | 张乐, 焦亮, 薛儒鸿, 张鹏, 王旭鸽, 秦亚蓉, 后赛鹏, 马媛媛. 祁连山祁连圆柏年内径向生长对水热因素的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1878-1889. |
| [7] | 胡璟, 吕世琪, 李冰, 马志波, 符利勇, 殷建章, 肖玖金, 闫佳源, 胡宗达. 温带过渡区4种典型天然林土壤有机碳组分与碳库管理指数变化特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1957-1972. |
| [8] | 黄智军, 甘子莹, 祝嘉新, 丘清燕, 胡亚林. 杉木不同器官不同碳氮比对土壤激发效应的影响及其机理[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1710-1720. |
| [9] | 杜淑辉, 褚建民, 段俊光, 薛建国, 徐磊, 徐晓庆, 王其兵, 黄建辉, 张倩. 木质素酚类物质对内蒙古退化草地土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 30-41. |
| [10] | 董云焘, 贾恒锋, 杨晶, 李佩轩, 方欧娅. 祁连山中部祁连圆柏林干扰历史重建[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 967-976. |
| [11] | 彭思瑞, 张慧玲, 孙兆林, 赵学超, 田鹏, 陈迪马, 王清奎, 刘圣恩. 长期凋落物去除对亚热带杉木林土壤有机碳及其组分的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 1078-1088. |
| [12] | 秦文宽, 张秋芳, 敖古凯麟, 朱彪. 土壤有机碳动态对增温的响应及机制研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 403-415. |
| [13] | 张嘉睿, 段晓洋, 兰天翔, 苏日高格, 刘林, 郭钟阳, 吕浩然, 张炜平, 李隆. 植物多样性对土壤有机碳及其稳定性影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(11): 1393-1405. |
| [14] | 张玉, 杜婷, 陈玉莲, 朱和萌, 谭波, 游成铭, 张丽, 徐振锋, 李晗. 冻融作用对亚高山森林土壤有机碳组分中不同凋落物源碳贡献的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(11): 1422-1433. |
| [15] | 王梁, 赵学超, 杨少博, 王清奎. 杉木叶和细根诱导的土壤有机碳分解激发效应及其对氮添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(11): 1434-1444. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19
