南水北调中线水源区浮游植物与水质评价

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0085

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过2003年3月至2005年8月对南水北调中线水源区水体浮游植物的调查,结果表明:该水域共有浮游植物8门63属96种及变种,其中以硅藻的种类最多,其次是绿藻和蓝藻。藻类的细胞密度表现出明显的季节变化,夏季最高冬季最低。从近3年的浮游生物检测结果可知,整个水源区年平均藻类细胞密度为109.33×10⁴ cells·L^-1,处于较低的水平,而且未检出水体重污染指示种,充分说明南水北调中线水源区富营养化程度较低。运用Margalef和Menkinick多样性指数对该水域的水质进行评价,数据显示2003~2005年该水源区的d值和α值,各采样点之间的差异并不显著,说明各采样点的水质营养状况虽有差异,但总体水平基本相当。水质评价结果:水体为寡污型,基本处于中营养状态。通过水生生物资源的调查,做好水源区的长期生态监测,可为建立中线水源区长期生态研究数据信息库及库区生态环境保护政策制定提供理论依据,对保证中线水质质量十分重要。

关键词: 南水北调中线水源区, 浮游植物, 生物检测, 群落结构, 水质评价

Abstract:

Background and Aims The water source area of the middle line project for transferring water from south to north is in the interface of Henan, Hubei and Shaanxi Provinces, the largest source of freshwater in Asia. Economic development of the area surrounding the Danjiangkou Reservoir will affect water quality. The objective of this study is to develop methods for monitoring biological resources, including annual changes of plankton in the reservoir, in order to provide a scientific base for sustainable exploitation, protection of biological resources, regulations for water resource protection, and establishment of a database for long-term ecological research on the middle line project.
Methods Water samples were collected using standard methods at three points of Qushou, Kuxin and Dashiqiao from March 2003 to August 2005, for biological, physical, and chemical analyses. Qualitative samples were collected using 25 phytoplankton networks, and taxa were identified by ordinary microscopes. Quantitative samples were collected using bottles and were fixed in Lugol's medium. Samples were condensed and counted in the laboratory under light microscopy with a phytoplankton counter frame. Algal diversity was calculated using Margalef and Menkinick diversity indices.
Key Results Samples contained 96 species and varieties, 63 genera, and 8 divisions of phytoplankton; diatoms were the most important component, followed by green algae and blue green algae (cyanobacteria). Cell densities exhibited seasonal changes, with maximum values in summer and minimum values in winter. Investigation of phytoplankton from three recent years showed an average annual density of algae of 109.33×10⁴ cells·L^-1 at low water level, and no pollution of indicator species was detected in the water sources. Application of diversity indices to assessment of water quality showed the d, α value, and differences among the different sample sites were small. There were only small differences in water quality nutrition status.
Conclusions Water quality indicated mesotrophy and middle nutrition status. This study provides a scientific base for long-term ecological research on biological resources and for policy development for ecological environmental protection. It will have an important effect on the water quality on the middle line project.

Key words: Water source area of the middle line project of transferring water from south to north, Phytoplankton, Biological monitoring, Species community, Water quality assessment

张乃群, 杜敏华, 庞振凌, 李玉英, 胡兰群. 南水北调中线水源区浮游植物与水质评价. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 650-654. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0085

ZHANG Nai-Qun, DU Min-Hua, PANG Zhen-Ling, LI Yu-Ying, HU Lan-Qun. INVESTIGATION OF PHYTOPLANKTON AND EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE WATER SOURCE AREA OF THE MIDDLE LINE PROJECT FOR TRANSFERRING WATER FROM SOUTH TO NORTH. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(4): 650-654. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0085

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0085

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2006/V30/I4/650

图/表 4

参考文献 18

[1]	Deng YX( 邓义祥), Zhang AJ( 张爱军) (1998). The use of algae in water contamination monitor. Resource Development & Market(资源开发与市场), 14, 197-198. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Foott B ( translated by Luo DA ( 罗迪安)) (1980). Phycology(藻类学). Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
[3]	Guo PY( 郭沛涌), Lin YZ( 林育真), Li YX( 李玉仙) (1997). Study on phytoplankton and evaluation of water quality in Dongping Lake. Transactions of Oceanlogy and Limnology(海洋湖沼通报), 19, 37-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Han MS ( 韩茂森)(19980). The Atlas of Freshwater Plankton(淡水浮游生物图谱). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 1-89. (in Chinese)
[5]	Hu HJ( 胡鸿钧), Li YY ( 李尧英), Wei YX( 魏印心)(1980). Chinese Freshwater Algae(中国淡水藻类). Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
[6]	James EB, Jerrold HZ(1977). Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, 136-145.
[7]	Jin XC( 金相灿), Tu QY( 屠清瑛) (1990). The Standard Methods in Lake Eutrophication Investigation(湖泊富营养化调查规范) 2nd edn. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, 143-302. (in Chinese)
[8]	Kuang QJ( 况琪军), Hu ZY( 胡征宇), Zhou GJ( 周广杰), Ye L( 叶麟), Cai QH( 蔡庆华) (2004). Investigation on phytoplankton in Xiangxi River watershed and the evaluation of its water quality. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research(武汉植物学研究), 22, 507-513. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Marglef DR(1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systems, 3, 36-71.
[10]	Rao QZ( 饶钦止)(1988). Foira Algarum Sinicarum Aquae Dulcis, Tomus.I. Zygnemataceae(中国淡水藻志第一卷, 双星藻科). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[11]	Smith GM(1950). The Fresh-Water Algae of the United States 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
[12]	Teaching and Research Section of Aquatic Species of Fisheries College of Xiamen( 厦门水产学院水生物教研组)(1980). The Common Freshwater Algae(淡水习见藻类). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[13]	The Editorial Committee of Water and Exhausted Water Monitoring Analysis Method( 水和废水监测分析方法编委会) (2002). Water and Exhausted Water Monitoring Analysis Method(水和废水监测分析方法) 4th edn. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[14]	Wang ZH( 王朝晖), Chen JF( 陈菊芳), Qi S( 杞桑), Jiang TJ( 江天久), Qi YZ( 齐雨藻) (2000). Studies on quantitative distribution and species composition of phytoplankton in star lake and the evaluation of its trophic status. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research (武汉植物学研究), 18, 405-411. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	Xin XY( 辛晓云) (2003). Assessment of water pollution using population structure of floating diatom in Nanwan Resservoir in Henan. Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 22, 125-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Xu L( 徐黎), Li GH( 李光华)(2003). Ecological environment comprehensive treatment in the Mid-Line Project of South to North Water Diversion. Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power(华北水利水电学院学报), 24(2), 74-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Zhan YT( 詹玉涛), Yang CS( 杨昌述), Fan ZN( 范正年) (1991). Study on interrelation between distribution of phytoplankton and water pollution in Fuqi River. China Environmental Science(中国环境科学), 11, 29-33. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Liu X( 刘霞), Du GS( 杜桂森), Zhang H( 张会), Hua ZL( 华振玲), Liu J( 刘静)(2003). Phytoplankton and nutrient degree of water body in Miyun Reservoir. Research of Environmental Sciences (环境科学研究), 16, 27-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)

采样点 Sampling sites	种数 Numbet of species	细胞密度 Cell density (×10⁴ cells·L^-1)	污染指示种 Instructive species of pollution				多样性指数 Index values
			β-中污 β-ms	α-β-中污 α-β-ms	α-中污 α-ms	寡污 os	多样性指数 Index values
			β-中污 β-ms	α-β-中污 α-β-ms	α-中污 α-ms	寡污 os	d	α
渠首Qushou (S1)	56	126.61	17	3	2	12	3.914 2	49.768 4
库心Kuxin (S2)	63	103.73	12	1	0	8	4.475 8	61.856 9
大石桥Dashiqiao (S3)	59	97.64	15	3	1	8	4.205 4	59.708 8

采样点 Sampling sites	种数 Numbet of species	细胞密度 Cell density (×10⁴ cells·L^-1)	污染指示种 Instructive species of pollution				多样性指数 Index values
			β-中污 β-ms	α-β-中污 α-β-ms	α-中污 α-ms	寡污 os	多样性指数 Index values
			β-中污 β-ms	α-β-中污 α-β-ms	α-中污 α-ms	寡污 os	d	α
渠首Qushou (S1)	56	126.61	17	3	2	12	3.914 2	49.768 4
库心Kuxin (S2)	63	103.73	12	1	0	8	4.475 8	61.856 9
大石桥Dashiqiao (S3)	59	97.64	15	3	1	8	4.205 4	59.708 8

采样点 Sampling point	采样时间 Sampling time	T (℃)	pH	DO (mg·L^-1)	透明度 Transparency(m)	EC (μs·cm^-1)	TN (mg·L^-1)	TP (mg·L^-1)	COD (mg·L^-1)	BOD (mg·L^-1)
S1	春季Spring	10.2	6.91	8.37	1.40	27.8	0.835	0	<10	<2
	夏季Summer	23.0	7.32	8.15	1.50	35.8	0.827	0	<10	<2
	秋季Autumn	27.4	7.50	7.67	0.90	25.6	0.717	0.005	12.6	2.34
	冬季Winter	18.6	8.33	8.12	2.50	21.0	0.709	0.005	17.9	4.1
S2	春季Spring	10.0	6.94	8.74	3.77	31.3	0.714	0	<10	<2
	夏季Summer	22.0	7.32	8.49	2.10	31.4	0.726	0	<10	<2
	秋季Autumn	27.0	8.47	7.02	2.65	25.2	0.637	0.005	11.0	2.27
	冬季Winter	19.6	8.29	8.24	3.00	20.0	0.614	0.005	10.0	2.00
S3	春季Spring	17.0	8.35	7.06	-	-	-	-	20.0	3.99
	夏季Summer	22.0	7.70	7.85	-	-	-	-	18.0	3.24
	秋季Autumn	21.0	8.34	6.78	-	-	-	-	15.4	3.54
	冬季Winter	18.5	7.53	7.69	-	-	-	-	16.4	4.0

采样点 Sampling point	采样时间 Sampling time	T (℃)	pH	DO (mg·L^-1)	透明度 Transparency(m)	EC (μs·cm^-1)	TN (mg·L^-1)	TP (mg·L^-1)	COD (mg·L^-1)	BOD (mg·L^-1)
S1	春季Spring	10.2	6.91	8.37	1.40	27.8	0.835	0	<10	<2
	夏季Summer	23.0	7.32	8.15	1.50	35.8	0.827	0	<10	<2
	秋季Autumn	27.4	7.50	7.67	0.90	25.6	0.717	0.005	12.6	2.34
	冬季Winter	18.6	8.33	8.12	2.50	21.0	0.709	0.005	17.9	4.1
S2	春季Spring	10.0	6.94	8.74	3.77	31.3	0.714	0	<10	<2
	夏季Summer	22.0	7.32	8.49	2.10	31.4	0.726	0	<10	<2
	秋季Autumn	27.0	8.47	7.02	2.65	25.2	0.637	0.005	11.0	2.27
	冬季Winter	19.6	8.29	8.24	3.00	20.0	0.614	0.005	10.0	2.00
S3	春季Spring	17.0	8.35	7.06	-	-	-	-	20.0	3.99
	夏季Summer	22.0	7.70	7.85	-	-	-	-	18.0	3.24
	秋季Autumn	21.0	8.34	6.78	-	-	-	-	15.4	3.54
	冬季Winter	18.5	7.53	7.69	-	-	-	-	16.4	4.0