植物生态学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 1356-1363.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2014.00130
康华靖1,2,3,4, 陶月良5, 权伟4, 王伟4, 欧阳竹2,3,4,*(
)
收稿日期:2014-03-21
接受日期:2014-05-10
出版日期:2014-03-21
发布日期:2015-04-16
作者简介:*(E-mail: ouyz@igsnrr.ac.cn)基金资助:
KANG Hua-Jing1,2,3,4, TAO Yue-Liang5, QUAN Wei4, WANG Wei4, OUYANG Zhu2,3,4,*(
)
Received:2014-03-21
Accepted:2014-05-10
Online:2014-03-21
Published:2015-04-16
摘要:
运用LI-6400便携式光合作用系统测定了不同光强(2000、1500、1000和500 μmol·m-2·s-1)和两种O2浓度(21%和2%的O2)下冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)灌浆期旗叶的CO2响应曲线, 比较了现有CO2响应模型(生化模型、直角双曲线模型和直角双曲线修正模型)拟合给出光下(暗)呼吸与测量值之间的差异。结果显示, 直角双曲线修正模型所给出的光下呼吸速率拟合值与测量值最为接近。植物光合作用对大气CO2响应(A/Ca)的拟合结果优于光合作用对胞间CO2浓度(A/Ci)的拟合。然而, 所有模型基于A/Ca拟合的光下(暗)呼吸在整体上与测量值存在显著差异(p < 0.05), 推测与现有模型没有考虑CO2浓度对光呼吸和光下暗呼吸速率的影响有关。对小麦的试验结果表明, CO2浓度对光呼吸和光下暗呼吸均有显著影响: 随着CO2浓度的增加(0-1400 μmol·mol-1), 不同光强下的表观光呼吸变化范围分别为5.035-11.670、4.222-11.650、4.330-10.999和3.263-9.094 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1; 光下暗呼吸的变化范围分别为0.491-2.987、0.457-2.955、0.545-3.139和0.448-3.139 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1。回归分析发现, 表观光呼吸和光下暗呼吸与CO2浓度之间均存在较好的相关性。然而, 将该回归关系整合到现有模型中, 是否会优化模型, 从而提高模型对相关光合参数估算的准确性尚有待于进一步研究。
康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 王伟, 欧阳竹. 植物光合CO2响应模型对光下(暗)呼吸速率拟合的探讨. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12): 1356-1363. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130
KANG Hua-Jing, TAO Yue-Liang, QUAN Wei, WANG Wei, OUYANG Zhu. Fitting mitochondrial respiration rates under light by photosynthetic CO2 response models. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(12): 1356-1363. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130
图1 不同光合有效辐射(PAR)下小麦旗叶表观光呼吸速率(Rpa)对CO2浓度(Ca)的响应(平均值±标准偏差)。
Fig. 1 Apparent photorespiration rate (Rpa) in response to CO2 concentration (Ca) at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in flag leaves of wheat (mean ± SD).
图2 不同光合有效辐射(PAR)下小麦叶片光呼吸CO2回收利用率(Re-i)或被抑制率(Ii)对CO2浓度(Ca)的响应(平均值±标准偏差)。
Fig. 2 Recovery (Re-i) or inhibition (Ii) of photorespiratory CO2 in response to CO2 concentration (Ca) at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (mean ± SD).
图4 不同CO2浓度(Ca)下小麦旗叶的光下暗呼吸速率(Rd) (平均值±标准偏差)。
Fig. 4 Mitochondrial respiration under light (Rd) in response to different CO2 concentration (Ca) in flag leaves of wheat (mean ± SD).
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | |
| 光下呼吸速率 Pn0-21% | 6.843 ± 0.341a | 6.343 ± 0.762a | 6.536 ± 0.408a | 5.729 ± 0.499a |
| 光下暗呼吸速率 Pn0-2% | 1.934 ± 0.190c | 2.064 ± 0.091c | 2.164 ± 0.112c | 2.539 ± 0.285c |
| 表观光呼吸 Rpa0 | 5.035 ± 0.194b | 4.222 ± 0.832b | 4.330 ± 0.394b | 3.263 ± 0.544b |
表1 不同光合有效辐射(PAR)下的小麦旗叶在CO2浓度为0时表观光合速率的测量值(μmol CO2·m-2·s-1) (平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 Measured values of photosynthetic rate in flag leaves of wheat at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) when CO2 concentration was 0 (μmol CO2·m-2·s-1) (mean ± SD)
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | |
| 光下呼吸速率 Pn0-21% | 6.843 ± 0.341a | 6.343 ± 0.762a | 6.536 ± 0.408a | 5.729 ± 0.499a |
| 光下暗呼吸速率 Pn0-2% | 1.934 ± 0.190c | 2.064 ± 0.091c | 2.164 ± 0.112c | 2.539 ± 0.285c |
| 表观光呼吸 Rpa0 | 5.035 ± 0.194b | 4.222 ± 0.832b | 4.330 ± 0.394b | 3.263 ± 0.544b |
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 17.924 ± 1.250*# | 16.947 ± 0.908*# | 15.754 ± 1.200*# | 12.780 ± 0.905*# | |
| C | 14.809 ± 0.279*# | 13.745 ± 1.117*# | 13.412 ± 0.744*# | 11.655 ± 1.154*# | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 8.745 ± 1.340*# | 8.335 ± 0.695*# | 8.769 ± 0.931*# | 7.245 ± 0.589*# | |
| C | 7.743 ± 0.556*# | 6.907 ± 0.528* | 7.579 ± 0.570*# | 6.491 ± 0.616*# | |
表2 不同光合有效辐射(PAR)下小麦旗叶的光下(暗)呼吸速率拟合值(21%的O2) (平均值±标准偏差)
Table 2 Fitted values of mitochondrial respiration in flag leaves of wheat under light at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and 21% O2 (mean ± SD)
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 17.924 ± 1.250*# | 16.947 ± 0.908*# | 15.754 ± 1.200*# | 12.780 ± 0.905*# | |
| C | 14.809 ± 0.279*# | 13.745 ± 1.117*# | 13.412 ± 0.744*# | 11.655 ± 1.154*# | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 8.745 ± 1.340*# | 8.335 ± 0.695*# | 8.769 ± 0.931*# | 7.245 ± 0.589*# | |
| C | 7.743 ± 0.556*# | 6.907 ± 0.528* | 7.579 ± 0.570*# | 6.491 ± 0.616*# | |
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 12.067 ± 0.808* | 12.286 ± 0.445* | 12.400 ± 0.783* | 11.350 ± 0.823* |
| B | 8.293 ± 1.500* | 9.245 ± 1.093* | 9.320 ± 0.843* | 9.416 ± 1.475* | |
| C | 6.099 ± 0.730* | 6.507 ± 0.913* | 6.609 ± 0.515* | 7.264 ± 0.561* | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577* | 21.857 ± 0.378* | 21.750 ± 0.500* | 20.850 ± 1.226* |
| B | 4.520 ± 1.118* | 5.022 ± 1.306* | 5.345 ± 0.828* | 4.919 ± 0.244* | |
| C | 2.766 ± 0.564* | 3.323 ± 0.977* | 3.326 ± 0.554* | 3.798 ± 0.251* | |
表3 不同光合有效辐射(PAR)下小麦旗叶的光下暗呼吸速率拟合值(2%的O2) (平均值±标准偏差)
Table 3 Fitted values of mitochondrial respiration in flag leaves of wheat under light at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and 2% O2 (mean ± SD)
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 12.067 ± 0.808* | 12.286 ± 0.445* | 12.400 ± 0.783* | 11.350 ± 0.823* |
| B | 8.293 ± 1.500* | 9.245 ± 1.093* | 9.320 ± 0.843* | 9.416 ± 1.475* | |
| C | 6.099 ± 0.730* | 6.507 ± 0.913* | 6.609 ± 0.515* | 7.264 ± 0.561* | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577* | 21.857 ± 0.378* | 21.750 ± 0.500* | 20.850 ± 1.226* |
| B | 4.520 ± 1.118* | 5.022 ± 1.306* | 5.345 ± 0.828* | 4.919 ± 0.244* | |
| C | 2.766 ± 0.564* | 3.323 ± 0.977* | 3.326 ± 0.554* | 3.798 ± 0.251* | |
| 1 | Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR, Long SP (2001). Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 24, 253-259. |
| 2 | Berry JA, Downton WJ (1982). Environmental regulation of photosynthesis. In: Govindjee ed. Photosynthesis. Academic Press, New York. |
| 3 | Cai SQ, Xu DQ (2000). Relationship between the CO2 compensation point and photorespiration in soybean leaves. Acta Phytophysiol Sinica, 26, 545-550.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [蔡时青, 许大全 (2000). 大豆叶片CO2补偿点和光呼吸的关系. 植物生理学报, 26, 545-550.] | |
| 4 | Ethier GJ, Livingston NJ (2004). On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar- von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell & Environment, 27, 137-153. |
| 5 | Farquhar GD, Caemmerers S, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78-90. |
| 6 | Guan XQ, Zhao SJ, Li DQ, Zhao XJ (2003). Photorespiration of C3 plant and its physiological function. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 23, 1849-1854.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [管雪强, 赵世杰, 李德全, 赵新节 (2003). C3植物光呼吸及其生理功能. 西北植物学报,23, 1849-1854.] | |
| 7 |
Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991). An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynthesis Research, 27, 169-178.
DOI URL PMID |
| 8 | Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2 . Plant,Cell & Environment, 15, 271-282. |
| 9 | Kang HJ, Tao YL, Quan W, Ouyang Z (2013). Response of photorespiration of wheat flag leaf to light intensities and CO2 concentrations. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 33, 1252-1257.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 王伟, 欧阳竹 (2013). 小麦旗叶光呼吸对光强和CO2浓度的响应. 麦类作物学报,33, 1252-1257.] | |
| 10 |
Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003). Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 2393-2401.
DOI URL PMID |
| 11 | Loreto F, Delfine S, Di-marco G (1999). Estimation of photorespiratory carbon dioxide recycling during photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 26, 733-736. |
| 12 | Loreto F, Velikova VB, Marco GDA (2001). Respiration in the light measured by 12CO2 emission in 13CO2 atmosphere in maize leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 1103-1108. |
| 13 | Peng CL, Lin ZF, Sun ZJ, Lin GZ, Chen YZ (1998). Response of rice photosynthesis to CO2 enrichment. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica, 24, 272-278.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [彭长连, 林植芳, 孙梓健, 林桂珠, 陈贻竹 (1998). 水稻光合作用对加富CO2的响应. 植物生理学报, 24, 272-278.] | |
| 14 |
von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981). Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387.
URL PMID |
| 15 | Ye ZP (2010). A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 727-740.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [叶子飘 (2010). 光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 34, 727-740.] | |
| 16 | Ye ZP, Yu Q (2009). A comparison of response curves of winter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO2 concentrations. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 2233-2238.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [叶子飘, 于强 (2009). 光合作用对胞间和大气CO2响应曲线的比较. 生态学杂志, 28, 2233-2238.] | |
| 17 |
Yin XY, Sun ZP, Struik PC, Gu JF (2011). Evaluating a new method to estimate the rate of leaf respiration in the light by analysis of combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 3489-3499.
DOI URL PMID |
| [1] | 苏晨飞, 田慰, 张楠, 唐龙, 赵宇玮, 王耀. 光合响应模型与理论指导的神经网络融合的多因素光合速率预测模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 173-187. |
| [2] | 李少伟, 何永涛, 孙维, 戴尔阜. 2016-2020年拉萨河谷典型农田生态系统长期监测样地作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1321-1328. |
| [3] | 朱喜, 何志斌, 杜明武, 赵丽雯, 吴丹丹. 2004-2010年河西走廊中段绿洲农田生态系统长期监测样地作物性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1312-1320. |
| [4] | 陈文义, 王智勇, 周梦岩, 麻文俊, 王军辉, 罗志斌, 周婧. 幼龄楸树生物量分配规律与异速生长模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 356-366. |
| [5] | 赵梦扬, 庄淏然, 许德浩, 马国荣, 马永成, 冯克鹏. 干旱半干旱地区灌区玉米农田土壤植物大气连续体系统氢氧稳定同位素特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 256-267. |
| [6] | 韩雨晴, 熊伟, 吴波, 卢琦, 杨文斌, 刘雅莉, 张景波, 辛智鸣, 马迎宾, 廉泓林, 王思涵. 乌兰布和沙漠梭梭茎干液流对降雨脉冲的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1172-1179. |
| [7] | 李蓓蓓, 张明军, 车存伟, 刘泽琛, 钟晓菲, 张园园, 张宇. 基于稳定同位素示踪的不同覆砂厚度下枣树水分利用策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1202-1212. |
| [8] | 付照琦, 胡旭, 田沁瑞, 葛艳灵, 周红娟, 吴小云, 陈立欣. 晋西黄土区2种典型森林树种夜间液流特征及对环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1128-1142. |
| [9] | 江康威, 张青青, 王亚菲, 李宏, 丁雨, 杨永强, 吐尔逊娜依•热依木. 放牧干扰下天山北坡中段植物功能群特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 701-718. |
| [10] | 张计深, 史新杰, 刘宇诺, 吴阳, 彭守璋. 气候变化下中国潜在自然植被生态系统碳储量动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 428-444. |
| [11] | 盘远方, 潘良浩, 邱思婷, 邱广龙, 苏治南, 史小芳, 范航清. 中国沿海红树林树高变异与环境适应机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 483-495. |
| [12] | 吴茹茹, 刘美珍, 谷仙, 常馨月, 郭立月, 蒋高明, 祁如意. 气候变化对巨柏适宜生境分布的潜在影响和预测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 445-458. |
| [13] | 王复标, 叶子飘. 植物电子传递速率光响应模型的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 287-305. |
| [14] | 兰光飞, 张强, 陈相标, 陈仕东, 熊德成, 刘小飞, 杨智杰, 杨玉盛. 中亚热带格氏栲林凋落物季节动态特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(12): 1589-1601. |
| [15] | 杨子龙, 罗光宇, 雷富民, 余静柔, 蔡圣轩, 于晶. 浙江象山沿海岛屿苔藓植物种-面积关系及物种丰富度影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(11): 1486-1500. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19