植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1185-1195.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.007 cstr: 32100.14.j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.007
所属专题: 青藏高原植物生态学:群落生态学
收稿日期:2009-11-02
接受日期:2010-06-25
出版日期:2010-11-02
发布日期:2010-10-31
作者简介:* E-mail: wzzhu@imde.ac.cn
ZHU Wan-Ze1,*(
), WANG San-Gen2, HAO Yun-Qing3
Received:2009-11-02
Accepted:2010-06-25
Online:2010-11-02
Published:2010-10-31
摘要:
萌生更新是森林更新的重要方式, 是硬叶栎林受到干扰后植被恢复的主要机制。以位于青藏高原东南缘的川西折多山东坡川滇高山栎(Quercus aquifoliodes)灌丛为研究对象, 调查分析了砍伐后灌丛萌生过程中基株根系和萌株生物量动态、营养元素含量, 以及基株根系和土壤对萌株生长过程中的营养元素供应动态。结果表明, 川滇高山栎灌丛平均地上和地下生物量分别为(11.25 ± 0.92) t·hm-2和(34.85 ± 2.02) t·hm-2, 具有较大的根冠比(3.10:1); 萌生过程中, 萌株生物量呈线性增加趋势, 以灌丛活细根生物量变化为最大, 其次是活中根和活粗根, 树桩和根蔸生物量变化最小; 萌生过程中, 灌丛细根和中根N、P含量表现为先增加、后降低的变化趋势, 萌生初期树桩、粗根和根蔸中N和K的含量明显下降, 根蔸中Ca含量略有下降, 而P没有明显下降, 根系Mg含量变化幅度较大, 灌丛地下根系储存了较多的营养元素; 土壤、树桩、粗根和根蔸是川滇高山栎灌丛砍伐后0-120天萌生生长的主要营养来源, 砍伐后60天, 萌株生长所需的营养除K元素主要来源于根系外, 其余营养元素主要来源于土壤; 在砍伐后60-120天, 基株根系对萌株生长所需的N、K和Ca贡献较大, 而对P和Mg的贡献较小; 在砍伐后120-180天, 根系除K元素对萌生生长还保持较大的贡献外, 对其余营养元素的贡献均较小。高山栎林管理要注重加强地下根系的保护。
朱万泽, 王三根, 郝云庆. 川滇高山栎灌丛萌生过程中的营养元素供应动态. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(10): 1185-1195. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.007
ZHU Wan-Ze, WANG San-Gen, HAO Yun-Qing. Dynamics of nutrient supply to sprouts from the roots and soil during sprouting of Quercus aquifoliodes shrublands, western Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(10): 1185-1195. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.007
| 植物部分 Plant parts | 伐后时间 Time after coppicing (d) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 150 | 180 | |
| 总地上生物量 Total aboveground biomass | 11 247 ± 916 | 503 ± 26 | 859 ± 27 | 1 360 ± 53 | 2 032 ± 60 | 2 332 ± 77 | 2 472 ± 65 |
| 树桩 Stump | 484 ± 26 | 482 ± 25 | 467 ± 26 | 463 ± 27 | 457 ± 28 | 454 ± 26 | 453 ± 25 |
| 萌株:叶 Sprout : leaf | 21 ± 2 | 232 ± 18 | 510 ± 29 | 827 ± 50 | 964 ± 53 | 1 031 ± 52 | |
| 萌株:茎 Sprouts : stem | 160 ± 10 | 387 ± 19 | 748 ± 36 | 914 ± 43 | 988 ± 48 | ||
| 总地下生物量 Total belowground biomass | 34 853 ± 2 016 | 35 027 ± 2 055 | 35 548 ± 2 054 | 36 008 ± 2 083 | 35 849 ± 2 061 | 35 826 ± 2 071 | 35 819 ± 2 030 |
| 细根 Fine root (fr) | 1 404 ± 102 | 1 451 ± 97 | 1 652 ± 113 | 1 853 ± 119 | 1 647 ± 117 | 1 572 ± 128 | 1 515 ± 110 |
| 中根 Medium root (mr) | 3 458 ± 220 | 3 476 ± 225 | 3 576 ± 216 | 3 766 ± 219 | 3 700 ± 214 | 3 654 ± 215 | 3 619 ± 210 |
| 粗根 Coarse root (cr) | 5 714 ± 319 | 5 774 ± 326 | 5 942 ± 331 | 5 949 ± 332 | 5 999 ± 323 | 6 047 ± 333 | 6 082 ± 299 |
| 根蔸 Taproot | 24 276 ± 1 400 | 24 326 ± 1 435 | 24 378 ± 1 427 | 24 440 ± 1 443 | 24 053 ± 1 441 | 24 553 ± 1 439 | 24 603 ± 1 448 |
| 细根:粗根 (fr) : (cr) ratio | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 |
| 细根:中根 (fr) : (mr) ratio | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.02 |
| 根冠比(地下部分:地上部分) Root : shoot ratio | 3.10 ± 0.19 | 69.66 ± 4.71 | 41.40 ± 2.49 | 26.48 ± 2.07 | 17.64 ± 1.08 | 15.36 ± 0.79 | 14.49 ± 0.49 |
表1 人工砍伐后川滇高山栎萌生过程中的生物量动态及其分布(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 Dynamic and its distribution for biomass (dry matter, kg·hm-2) of plant parts in the course of sprouting after coppicing of Quercus aquifoliodes shrubs (mean ± SD)
| 植物部分 Plant parts | 伐后时间 Time after coppicing (d) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 150 | 180 | |
| 总地上生物量 Total aboveground biomass | 11 247 ± 916 | 503 ± 26 | 859 ± 27 | 1 360 ± 53 | 2 032 ± 60 | 2 332 ± 77 | 2 472 ± 65 |
| 树桩 Stump | 484 ± 26 | 482 ± 25 | 467 ± 26 | 463 ± 27 | 457 ± 28 | 454 ± 26 | 453 ± 25 |
| 萌株:叶 Sprout : leaf | 21 ± 2 | 232 ± 18 | 510 ± 29 | 827 ± 50 | 964 ± 53 | 1 031 ± 52 | |
| 萌株:茎 Sprouts : stem | 160 ± 10 | 387 ± 19 | 748 ± 36 | 914 ± 43 | 988 ± 48 | ||
| 总地下生物量 Total belowground biomass | 34 853 ± 2 016 | 35 027 ± 2 055 | 35 548 ± 2 054 | 36 008 ± 2 083 | 35 849 ± 2 061 | 35 826 ± 2 071 | 35 819 ± 2 030 |
| 细根 Fine root (fr) | 1 404 ± 102 | 1 451 ± 97 | 1 652 ± 113 | 1 853 ± 119 | 1 647 ± 117 | 1 572 ± 128 | 1 515 ± 110 |
| 中根 Medium root (mr) | 3 458 ± 220 | 3 476 ± 225 | 3 576 ± 216 | 3 766 ± 219 | 3 700 ± 214 | 3 654 ± 215 | 3 619 ± 210 |
| 粗根 Coarse root (cr) | 5 714 ± 319 | 5 774 ± 326 | 5 942 ± 331 | 5 949 ± 332 | 5 999 ± 323 | 6 047 ± 333 | 6 082 ± 299 |
| 根蔸 Taproot | 24 276 ± 1 400 | 24 326 ± 1 435 | 24 378 ± 1 427 | 24 440 ± 1 443 | 24 053 ± 1 441 | 24 553 ± 1 439 | 24 603 ± 1 448 |
| 细根:粗根 (fr) : (cr) ratio | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 |
| 细根:中根 (fr) : (mr) ratio | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.02 |
| 根冠比(地下部分:地上部分) Root : shoot ratio | 3.10 ± 0.19 | 69.66 ± 4.71 | 41.40 ± 2.49 | 26.48 ± 2.07 | 17.64 ± 1.08 | 15.36 ± 0.79 | 14.49 ± 0.49 |
| 植物部分 Plant parts | 伐后时间 Time after coppicing (d) | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | ||
| 萌株:叶 Sprouts : leaf | 0 | ||||||||||
| 30 | 17.33 | 0.36 | 4.54 | 0.09 | 3.59 | 0.07 | 1.72 | 0.04 | 1.29 | 0.03 | |
| 60 | 26.21 | 6.08 | 5.29 | 1.23 | 3.81 | 0.88 | 2.13 | 0.49 | 1.56 | 0.36 | |
| 90 | 24.57 | 12.52 | 5.24 | 2.67 | 3.71 | 1.89 | 2.23 | 1.14 | 1.44 | 0.74 | |
| 120 | 22.26 | 18.40 | 5.25 | 4.34 | 3.63 | 3.00 | 2.27 | 1.88 | 1.28 | 1.06 | |
| 150 | 18.57 | 17.91 | 4.63 | 4.46 | 3.60 | 3.47 | 2.32 | 2.24 | 1.27 | 1.22 | |
| 180 | 16.41 | 16.92 | 4.61 | 4.76 | 3.38 | 3.48 | 2.34 | 2.41 | 1.17 | 1.21 | |
| 萌株:茎 Sprouts : stem | 0 | ||||||||||
| 30 | |||||||||||
| 60 | 10.10 | 1.62 | 2.26 | 0.36 | 4.08 | 0.65 | 2.50 | 0.40 | 1.56 | 0.25 | |
| 90 | 9.36 | 3.62 | 2.36 | 0.91 | 4.43 | 1.71 | 2.73 | 1.05 | 1.72 | 0.67 | |
| 120 | 9.11 | 6.81 | 2.25 | 1.68 | 4.07 | 3.04 | 2.81 | 2.10 | 1.58 | 1.18 | |
| 150 | 8.64 | 7.89 | 2.12 | 1.93 | 3.85 | 3.52 | 3.26 | 2.98 | 1.51 | 1.38 | |
| 180 | 7.88 | 7.79 | 2.03 | 2.00 | 3.70 | 3.66 | 3.23 | 3.19 | 1.25 | 1.23 | |
| 萌株:叶+茎 Sprout : leaf + stem | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 30 | 0.36 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | ||||||
| 60 | 7.70 | 1.59 | 1.54 | 0.90 | 0.61 | ||||||
| 90 | 16.14 | 3.58 | 3.61 | 2.19 | 1.40 | ||||||
| 120 | 25.21 | 6.02 | 6.04 | 3.98 | 2.24 | ||||||
| 150 | 25.80 | 6.40 | 6.99 | 5.21 | 2.60 | ||||||
| 180 | 24.71 | 6.76 | 7.14 | 5.61 | 2.44 | ||||||
| 树桩 Stump | 0 | 2.75 | 1.33 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 1.33 | 0.64 | 0.91 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.16 |
| 30 | 2.57 | 1.24 | 0.71 | 0.34 | 1.20 | 0.58 | 0.91 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.16 | |
| 60 | 2.35 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 0.30 | 1.19 | 0.56 | 0.87 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.15 | |
| 90 | 2.14 | 0.99 | 0.60 | 0.28 | 1.17 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.15 | |
| 120 | 2.09 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 0.27 | 1.18 | 0.55 | 0.87 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.15 | |
| 150 | 1.99 | 0.91 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 1.17 | 0.53 | 0.83 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.13 | |
| 180 | 2.01 | 0.91 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 1.18 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.14 | |
| 细根 Fine root | 0 | 5.77 | 8.10 | 1.24 | 1.74 | 2.65 | 3.73 | 2.61 | 3.67 | 1.32 | 1.86 |
| 30 | 6.11 | 8.86 | 1.29 | 1.88 | 2.72 | 3.94 | 2.62 | 3.80 | 1.58 | 2.30 | |
| 60 | 6.29 | 10.40 | 1.35 | 2.23 | 2.81 | 4.65 | 2.71 | 4.47 | 1.56 | 2.58 | |
| 90 | 6.38 | 11.82 | 1.34 | 2.48 | 2.84 | 5.26 | 2.75 | 5.09 | 1.67 | 3.10 | |
| 120 | 6.30 | 10.38 | 1.31 | 2.16 | 2.87 | 4.73 | 2.82 | 4.64 | 1.68 | 2.78 | |
| 150 | 6.23 | 9.80 | 1.24 | 1.95 | 2.74 | 4.31 | 2.81 | 4.42 | 1.70 | 2.67 | |
| 180 | 6.21 | 9.41 | 1.27 | 1.92 | 2.69 | 4.08 | 2.83 | 4.29 | 1.71 | 2.60 | |
| 中根 Medium root | 0 | 2.88 | 9.96 | 1.13 | 3.92 | 1.69 | 5.85 | 2.18 | 7.54 | 1.35 | 4.68 |
| 30 | 3.06 | 10.64 | 1.16 | 4.04 | 1.73 | 6.02 | 2.21 | 7.69 | 1.40 | 4.88 | |
| 60 | 3.07 | 10.97 | 1.19 | 4.27 | 1.76 | 6.31 | 2.29 | 8.21 | 1.42 | 5.09 | |
| 90 | 2.58 | 9.72 | 1.17 | 4.42 | 1.84 | 6.92 | 2.33 | 8.78 | 1.52 | 5.72 | |
| 120 | 2.55 | 9.44 | 1.16 | 4.29 | 1.76 | 6.51 | 2.31 | 8.55 | 1.53 | 5.67 | |
| 150 | 2.58 | 9.43 | 1.14 | 4.18 | 1.74 | 6.35 | 2.31 | 8.45 | 1.66 | 6.07 | |
| 180 | 2.58 | 9.34 | 1.11 | 4.01 | 1.69 | 6.11 | 2.27 | 8.22 | 1.61 | 5.82 | |
| 粗根 Coarse root | 0 | 2.13 | 12.17 | 1.11 | 6.32 | 1.63 | 9.30 | 2.07 | 11.80 | 1.44 | 8.25 |
| 30 | 2.08 | 12.01 | 1.14 | 6.59 | 1.57 | 9.06 | 2.01 | 11.60 | 1.43 | 8.25 | |
| 60 | 1.89 | 11.26 | 1.11 | 6.57 | 1.48 | 8.82 | 2.02 | 12.01 | 1.38 | 8.22 | |
| 90 | 1.68 | 10.02 | 1.03 | 6.15 | 1.37 | 8.13 | 2.02 | 12.03 | 1.24 | 7.39 | |
| 120 | 1.64 | 9.81 | 1.08 | 6.48 | 1.47 | 8.82 | 2.05 | 12.29 | 1.17 | 7.00 | |
| 150 | 1.72 | 10.40 | 1.03 | 6.21 | 1.45 | 8.77 | 2.08 | 12.60 | 1.18 | 7.14 | |
| 180 | 1.80 | 10.96 | 1.05 | 6.38 | 1.48 | 9.01 | 2.10 | 12.77 | 1.17 | 7.11 | |
| 根蔸 Taproot | 0 | 1.39 | 33.73 | 0.55 | 13.47 | 1.19 | 28.96 | 0.82 | 19.98 | 0.37 | 9.09 |
| 30 | 1.32 | 32.19 | 0.57 | 13.90 | 1.16 | 28.24 | 0.84 | 20.46 | 0.36 | 8.86 | |
| 60 | 1.21 | 29.47 | 0.50 | 12.20 | 1.11 | 27.04 | 0.77 | 18.66 | 0.34 | 8.31 | |
| 90 | 1.12 | 27.40 | 0.47 | 11.39 | 1.04 | 25.32 | 0.68 | 16.50 | 0.31 | 7.53 | |
| 120 | 1.06 | 25.89 | 0.49 | 12.12 | 1.00 | 24.58 | 0.68 | 16.72 | 0.33 | 8.19 | |
| 150 | 1.17 | 28.69 | 0.51 | 12.61 | 1.06 | 25.92 | 0.70 | 17.18 | 0.32 | 7.79 | |
| 180 | 1.21 | 29.87 | 0.52 | 12.80 | 1.06 | 26.05 | 0.71 | 17.38 | 0.33 | 8.11 | |
表2 川滇高山栎萌生过程中萌株和地下根系营养元素的含量及其积累
Table 2 Concentration and accumulation of nutrient elements in the sprout, stumps and roots in the course of sprouting after coppicing of Quercus aquifoliodes shrubs
| 植物部分 Plant parts | 伐后时间 Time after coppicing (d) | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | g·kg-1 | kg·hm-2 | ||
| 萌株:叶 Sprouts : leaf | 0 | ||||||||||
| 30 | 17.33 | 0.36 | 4.54 | 0.09 | 3.59 | 0.07 | 1.72 | 0.04 | 1.29 | 0.03 | |
| 60 | 26.21 | 6.08 | 5.29 | 1.23 | 3.81 | 0.88 | 2.13 | 0.49 | 1.56 | 0.36 | |
| 90 | 24.57 | 12.52 | 5.24 | 2.67 | 3.71 | 1.89 | 2.23 | 1.14 | 1.44 | 0.74 | |
| 120 | 22.26 | 18.40 | 5.25 | 4.34 | 3.63 | 3.00 | 2.27 | 1.88 | 1.28 | 1.06 | |
| 150 | 18.57 | 17.91 | 4.63 | 4.46 | 3.60 | 3.47 | 2.32 | 2.24 | 1.27 | 1.22 | |
| 180 | 16.41 | 16.92 | 4.61 | 4.76 | 3.38 | 3.48 | 2.34 | 2.41 | 1.17 | 1.21 | |
| 萌株:茎 Sprouts : stem | 0 | ||||||||||
| 30 | |||||||||||
| 60 | 10.10 | 1.62 | 2.26 | 0.36 | 4.08 | 0.65 | 2.50 | 0.40 | 1.56 | 0.25 | |
| 90 | 9.36 | 3.62 | 2.36 | 0.91 | 4.43 | 1.71 | 2.73 | 1.05 | 1.72 | 0.67 | |
| 120 | 9.11 | 6.81 | 2.25 | 1.68 | 4.07 | 3.04 | 2.81 | 2.10 | 1.58 | 1.18 | |
| 150 | 8.64 | 7.89 | 2.12 | 1.93 | 3.85 | 3.52 | 3.26 | 2.98 | 1.51 | 1.38 | |
| 180 | 7.88 | 7.79 | 2.03 | 2.00 | 3.70 | 3.66 | 3.23 | 3.19 | 1.25 | 1.23 | |
| 萌株:叶+茎 Sprout : leaf + stem | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 30 | 0.36 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | ||||||
| 60 | 7.70 | 1.59 | 1.54 | 0.90 | 0.61 | ||||||
| 90 | 16.14 | 3.58 | 3.61 | 2.19 | 1.40 | ||||||
| 120 | 25.21 | 6.02 | 6.04 | 3.98 | 2.24 | ||||||
| 150 | 25.80 | 6.40 | 6.99 | 5.21 | 2.60 | ||||||
| 180 | 24.71 | 6.76 | 7.14 | 5.61 | 2.44 | ||||||
| 树桩 Stump | 0 | 2.75 | 1.33 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 1.33 | 0.64 | 0.91 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.16 |
| 30 | 2.57 | 1.24 | 0.71 | 0.34 | 1.20 | 0.58 | 0.91 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.16 | |
| 60 | 2.35 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 0.30 | 1.19 | 0.56 | 0.87 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.15 | |
| 90 | 2.14 | 0.99 | 0.60 | 0.28 | 1.17 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.15 | |
| 120 | 2.09 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 0.27 | 1.18 | 0.55 | 0.87 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.15 | |
| 150 | 1.99 | 0.91 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 1.17 | 0.53 | 0.83 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.13 | |
| 180 | 2.01 | 0.91 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 1.18 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.14 | |
| 细根 Fine root | 0 | 5.77 | 8.10 | 1.24 | 1.74 | 2.65 | 3.73 | 2.61 | 3.67 | 1.32 | 1.86 |
| 30 | 6.11 | 8.86 | 1.29 | 1.88 | 2.72 | 3.94 | 2.62 | 3.80 | 1.58 | 2.30 | |
| 60 | 6.29 | 10.40 | 1.35 | 2.23 | 2.81 | 4.65 | 2.71 | 4.47 | 1.56 | 2.58 | |
| 90 | 6.38 | 11.82 | 1.34 | 2.48 | 2.84 | 5.26 | 2.75 | 5.09 | 1.67 | 3.10 | |
| 120 | 6.30 | 10.38 | 1.31 | 2.16 | 2.87 | 4.73 | 2.82 | 4.64 | 1.68 | 2.78 | |
| 150 | 6.23 | 9.80 | 1.24 | 1.95 | 2.74 | 4.31 | 2.81 | 4.42 | 1.70 | 2.67 | |
| 180 | 6.21 | 9.41 | 1.27 | 1.92 | 2.69 | 4.08 | 2.83 | 4.29 | 1.71 | 2.60 | |
| 中根 Medium root | 0 | 2.88 | 9.96 | 1.13 | 3.92 | 1.69 | 5.85 | 2.18 | 7.54 | 1.35 | 4.68 |
| 30 | 3.06 | 10.64 | 1.16 | 4.04 | 1.73 | 6.02 | 2.21 | 7.69 | 1.40 | 4.88 | |
| 60 | 3.07 | 10.97 | 1.19 | 4.27 | 1.76 | 6.31 | 2.29 | 8.21 | 1.42 | 5.09 | |
| 90 | 2.58 | 9.72 | 1.17 | 4.42 | 1.84 | 6.92 | 2.33 | 8.78 | 1.52 | 5.72 | |
| 120 | 2.55 | 9.44 | 1.16 | 4.29 | 1.76 | 6.51 | 2.31 | 8.55 | 1.53 | 5.67 | |
| 150 | 2.58 | 9.43 | 1.14 | 4.18 | 1.74 | 6.35 | 2.31 | 8.45 | 1.66 | 6.07 | |
| 180 | 2.58 | 9.34 | 1.11 | 4.01 | 1.69 | 6.11 | 2.27 | 8.22 | 1.61 | 5.82 | |
| 粗根 Coarse root | 0 | 2.13 | 12.17 | 1.11 | 6.32 | 1.63 | 9.30 | 2.07 | 11.80 | 1.44 | 8.25 |
| 30 | 2.08 | 12.01 | 1.14 | 6.59 | 1.57 | 9.06 | 2.01 | 11.60 | 1.43 | 8.25 | |
| 60 | 1.89 | 11.26 | 1.11 | 6.57 | 1.48 | 8.82 | 2.02 | 12.01 | 1.38 | 8.22 | |
| 90 | 1.68 | 10.02 | 1.03 | 6.15 | 1.37 | 8.13 | 2.02 | 12.03 | 1.24 | 7.39 | |
| 120 | 1.64 | 9.81 | 1.08 | 6.48 | 1.47 | 8.82 | 2.05 | 12.29 | 1.17 | 7.00 | |
| 150 | 1.72 | 10.40 | 1.03 | 6.21 | 1.45 | 8.77 | 2.08 | 12.60 | 1.18 | 7.14 | |
| 180 | 1.80 | 10.96 | 1.05 | 6.38 | 1.48 | 9.01 | 2.10 | 12.77 | 1.17 | 7.11 | |
| 根蔸 Taproot | 0 | 1.39 | 33.73 | 0.55 | 13.47 | 1.19 | 28.96 | 0.82 | 19.98 | 0.37 | 9.09 |
| 30 | 1.32 | 32.19 | 0.57 | 13.90 | 1.16 | 28.24 | 0.84 | 20.46 | 0.36 | 8.86 | |
| 60 | 1.21 | 29.47 | 0.50 | 12.20 | 1.11 | 27.04 | 0.77 | 18.66 | 0.34 | 8.31 | |
| 90 | 1.12 | 27.40 | 0.47 | 11.39 | 1.04 | 25.32 | 0.68 | 16.50 | 0.31 | 7.53 | |
| 120 | 1.06 | 25.89 | 0.49 | 12.12 | 1.00 | 24.58 | 0.68 | 16.72 | 0.33 | 8.19 | |
| 150 | 1.17 | 28.69 | 0.51 | 12.61 | 1.06 | 25.92 | 0.70 | 17.18 | 0.32 | 7.79 | |
| 180 | 1.21 | 29.87 | 0.52 | 12.80 | 1.06 | 26.05 | 0.71 | 17.38 | 0.33 | 8.11 | |
图1 砍伐后不同时间内川滇高山栎灌丛萌生过程中根系(RS)和土壤(SS)对萌株的营养供应(平均值±标准偏差)。
Fig. 1 Nitrogen elements supplied by the roots (RS) and soil (SS) to the sprouts at the different times after coppicing (mean ± SD).
| [1] | Abrams MD (1996). Distribution, historical development and ecophysiological attributes of oak species in the eastern United States. Annals of Forest Science, 53, 487-512. |
| [2] |
Abrams MD, Downs JA (1990). Successional replacement of old-growth whiten oak by mixed mesophytic hardwoods in southwestern Pennsylvania. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 1864-1870.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Andersson C (1991). Distribution of seedlings and saplings of Quercus robur in a grazed deciduous forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 279-282.
DOI URL |
| [4] | Ågren G, Axelsson B, Flower-Ellis JGK, Linder T, Persson H, Staaf H, Troeng E (1980). Annual carbon budget for a young Scots pine. Ecological Bulletin, 32, 307-313. |
| [5] | Bao WK (包维楷), Chen QH (陈庆恒), Liu ZG (刘照光) (2000). Changes of structure and species composition of degraded plant community along disturbance gradients of different intensities. Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 22, 307-361. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [6] |
Basnet K (1993). Recovery of a tropical rain forest after hurricane damage. Vegetatio, 109, 1-4.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
Bell TL, Ojeda F (1999). Underground starch storage in Erica species of the Cape Floristic Region―differences between seeders and resprouters. New Phytologist, 144, 143-152.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001). Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 45-51.
URL PMID |
| [9] | Bowen BJ, Pate JS (1993). The significance of root starch in post-fire shoot recovery of the resprouter Stirlingia latifolia R. Br. (Proteaceae). Annual Journal of Botany, 72, 7-16. |
| [10] |
Canadell J, Rodà F (1991). Root biomass of Quercus ilex in a montane Mediterranean forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 1771-178.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
Clarke PJ, Knox KJE, Wills KE, Campbell M (2005). Landscape patterns of woody plant response to crown fire: disturbance and productivity influence sprouting ability. Journal of Ecology, 93, 544-555.
URL PMID |
| [12] |
Crow TR (1992). Population dynamics and growth patterns for a cohort of northern red oak (Quercus rubra) seedlings. Oecologia, 91, 192-200.
DOI URL PMID |
| [13] |
de Viñas ICR, Ayanz ASM (2000). Biomass of root and shoot systems of Quercus coccifera shrublands in Eastern Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 57, 803-810.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
El Omari B, Aranda X, Verdaguer D, Pascual G, Fleck I (2003). Resource remobilization in Quercus ilex L. resprouts. Plant and Soil, 252, 349-357.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
Espelta JM, Riba M, Retana J (1995). Patterns of seedling recruitment in west Mediterranean Quercus ilex forests influenced by canopy development. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6, 465-472.
DOI URL |
| [16] | Espelta JM, Sabate S, Retana J (1999). Resprouting dynamics. In: Roda F, Retana J, Gracia CA, Bellot J eds. Ecology of Mediterranean Evergreen Oak Forests Springer, Berlin. 61-73. |
| [17] |
FitzGerald RD, Hoddinott J (1983). The utilization of carbohydrates in aspen roots following partial or complete top removal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 685-689.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Gurvich DE, Enrico L, Cingolani AM (2005). Linking plant functional traits with post-fire sprouting vigour in woody species in central Argentina. Austral Ecology, 30, 789-796.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
Hansen A, Pate JS, Hansen AP (1991). Growth and reproductive performance of a seeder and a resprouter species of Bossiaea as a function of plant age after fire. Annals of Botany, 67, 497-509.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
Herrera J (1995). Acorn predation and seedling production in a low density population of cork oak (Quercus suber L.). Forest Ecology and Management, 76, 197-201.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
Iwasa Y, Kubo T (1997). Optimal size of storage for recovery after unpredictable disturbances. Evolutionary Ecology, 11, 41-65.
DOI URL |
| [22] | Joslin JD, Henderson GS (1987). Organic matter and nutrients associated with fine root turnover in a white oak stand. Forest Science, 33, 330-346. |
| [23] |
Kauffman JB (1991). Survival by sprouting following fire in tropical forests of the eastern Amazon. Biotropica, 23, 219-224.
DOI URL |
| [24] | Kays JS, Canham CD (1991). Effects of time and frequency of cutting on hardwood root reserves and sprout growth. Forest Science, 37, 524-539. |
| [25] |
Knox KJE, Clarke PJ (2005). Nutrient availability induces contrasting allocation and starch formation in resprouting and obligate seeding shrubs. Functional Ecology, 19, 690-698.
DOI URL |
| [26] | Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT (1979). Physiology of Wood Plants. Academic Press, New York. 277, 811. |
| [27] | Kuhns MR, Garrett HE, Teskey RO, Hinckley TM (1985). Root growth of black walnut trees related to soil temperature, soil water potential and leaf water potential. Forest Science, 31, 617-629. |
| [28] |
Kummerow J, Kummerow M, Trabaud L (1990). Root biomass, root distribution and the fine-root growth dynamics of Quercus coccifera L. in the garrigue of southern France. Vegetatio, 87, 37-44.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
Kurz WA, Kimmins JP (1987). Analysis of some sources of error in methods used to determine fine root production in forest ecosystems: a simulation approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 909-912.
DOI URL |
| [30] | Liu XL (刘兴良), Hao XD (郝晓东), Yang DS (杨冬生), Liu SR (刘世荣), Su YM (宿以明), Cai XH (蔡小虎), He F (何飞), Ma QY (马钦彦) (2006). Aboveground biomass and its models of Quercus aquifolioides thicket community in Balangshan Mountain in Wolong Natural Reserve. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 25, 487-491. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [31] | Liu XL (刘兴良), Yue YJ (岳永杰), Zheng SW (郑少伟), Liu SR (刘世荣), Shi ZM (史作民), Yang DS (杨冬生), Yang YP (杨玉坡), Ma QY (马钦彦) (2005). The altitudinal gradient changes of population demography characteristics of Quercus aquifolioides population. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology (四川林业科技), 26(4), 9-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [32] |
López B, Sabaté S, Gracia CA (2001). Annual and seasonal changes in fine root biomass of a Quercus ilex L. forest. Plant and Soil, 230, 125-134.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
Lorimer CG, Chapman W, Lambert WD (1994). Tall understory vegetation as a factor in the poor development of oak seedlings beneath mature stands. Journal of Ecology, 82, 227-237.
DOI URL |
| [34] | Marschner H (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London. 889. |
| [35] |
Nadelhoffer KJ, Raich JW (1992). Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology, 73, 1139-1147.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
Nzunda EF, Griffiths ME, Lawes MJ (2008). Sprouting by remobilization of above-ground resources ensures persistence after disturbance of coastal dune forest trees. Functional Ecology, 22, 577-582.
DOI URL |
| [37] | Ou XK (欧晓昆), Zhang YC (张云春) (1992). Primary study on the population pattern of dominant species and biomass of Quercus longispica sprouted shrub community. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition) 云南大学学报(自然科学版)), 14, 198-201. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [38] |
Pate JS, Froend RH, Bowen BJ, Hansen A, Kuo J (1990). Seedling growth and storage characteristics of seeder and resprouter species of Mediterranean-type ecosystems of S.W. Australia. Annals of Botany, 65, 585-601.
DOI URL |
| [39] |
Pate JS, Meney KA, Dixon KW (1991). Contrasting growth and morphological characteristics of fire-sensitive (obligate seeder) and fire-resistant (resprouter) species of Restionaceae (S. Hemisphere Restiads) from south-western Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany, 39, 505-525.
DOI URL |
| [40] |
Persson HA (1983). The distribution and productivity of fine roots in boreal forests. Plant and Soil, 71, 87-101.
DOI URL |
| [41] |
Roundy BA, Jordan GL (1988). Vegetation changes in relation to livestock exclusion and root plowing in southeastern Arizona (USA). The Southwestern Naturalist, 33, 425-436.
DOI URL |
| [42] | Sichuan Forest Editorial Committee (四川森林编委会) (1992). Forests in Sichuan. Chinese Forestry Press, Beijing. 634-645. (in Chinese) |
| [43] |
Simon ML, Victor JL (2003). Seasonal changes in carbohydrate reserves in matyre northern Populus tremuloides clones. Trees, 17, 471-476.
DOI URL |
| [44] |
Teixeira PC, Novais RF, Barros NF, Neves JCL, Teixeira JL (2002). Eucalyptus urophylla root growth, stem sprouting and nutrient supply from the roots and soil. Forest Ecology and Management, 160, 263-271.
DOI URL |
| [45] |
Teskey RO, Hinckley TM (1981). Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak. Physiologia Plantarum, 52, 363-369.
DOI URL |
| [46] |
Thadani R, Ashton PMS (1995). Regeneration of banj oak (Quercus leucotricophora A. Camus) in the central Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management, 78, 217-224.
DOI URL |
| [47] |
Verdaguer D, Ojeda F (2002). Root starch storage and allocation patterns in seeder and resprouter seedlings of two Cape Erica (Ericaceae) species. American Journal of Botany, 89, 1189-1196.
URL PMID |
| [48] |
Vesk PA, Westoby M (2004). Sprouting ability across diverse disturbances and vegetation types worldwide. Journal of Ecology, 92, 310-320.
DOI URL |
| [49] | Yang QZ (杨钦周) (1990). The characteristics and classification of oak durisilvae in the Himalayan region of China. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学学报), 14, 197-211. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [50] | Yu Y (于洋), Cao M (曹敏), Liu WS (刘文胜) (2003). Diversity of tree species of subalpine coniferous forests and Quercus sclerophyllous forests in northwest Yunnan. Journal of Mountain Science (山地学报), 21, 568-575. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [51] | Zhu WZ (朱万泽), Wang JX (王金锡), Luo CR (罗成荣), Duan XM (段学梅) (2007). Progresses of studies on forest sprout regeneration. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 43(9), 74-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 张静, 陈洁, 李艳朋, 盘李军, 许涵, 李意德, 何海生. 南亚热带针阔混交人工林植物生物量比较及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [2] | 徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [3] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [4] | 邢强, 赵斌, 胡永红, 杨君, 秦俊, 刘何铭, 王红兵, 周鹏. 华东地区两种典型立体绿化植物根系性状特征及对新型土壤基质的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1498-1514. |
| [5] | 宋珊珊, 唐志尧. 河北塞罕坝草甸草原根际土壤真菌与植物地上生物量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1461-1471. |
| [6] | 朱瑞德, 杨俊薇, 刘宵含, 陈冰瑞, 池秀莲, 田地, 杨光, 程蒙, 戴亚峰, 王诗文. 霍山石斛设施和林下栽培模式中养分对植物-微生物关联的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1434-1447. |
| [7] | 樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [8] | 马腾飞, 郝杰, 刁华杰, 宁亚楠, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 董宽虎. 晋北农牧交错带草地土壤无机氮含量的季节变化及其对放牧强度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 965-974. |
| [9] | 刘新月, 王立平, 刘春和, 孙艳丽, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山, 钱多. 北京不同林龄人工林生物量空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 939-951. |
| [10] | 陈文义, 王智勇, 周梦岩, 麻文俊, 王军辉, 罗志斌, 周婧. 幼龄楸树生物量分配规律与异速生长模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 356-366. |
| [11] | 李兵飒, 马望, 白龙, 王正文. 羊草根茎储藏功能对克隆分株萌生、存活和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1869-1877. |
| [12] | 郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158. |
| [13] | 王袼, 胡姝娅, 李阳, 陈晓鹏, 李红玉, 董宽虎, 何念鹏, 王常慧. 不同类型草原土壤净氮矿化速率的温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 523-533. |
| [14] | 梁逸娴, 王传宽, 臧妙涵, 上官虹玉, 刘逸潇, 全先奎. 落叶松径向生长和生物量分配对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 459-468. |
| [15] | 黄玲, 王榛, 马泽, 杨发林, 李岚, SEREKPAYEV Nurlan, NOGAYEV Adilbek, 侯扶江. 长期放牧和氮添加对黄土高原典型草原长芒草种群生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 317-330. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19