云南杨梅碳、氮、磷化学计量特征

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2016.0026

植物生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 136-146.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0026

所属专题：中国灌丛生态系统碳储量的研究；生态化学计量

云南杨梅碳、氮、磷化学计量特征

苏凯文¹, 陈路红¹, 郑伟¹, 潘瑶², 尹华军³, 巩合德^1,^*()

¹西南林业大学生态旅游学院, 昆明 650224
²西南林业大学亚太森林组织昆明培训中心, 昆明 650224
³中国科学院成都生物研究所, 成都 610041

收稿日期:2016-01-17 接受日期:2016-12-25 出版日期:2017-01-10 发布日期:2017-01-23
通讯作者: 巩合德
作者简介:* 通信作者Author for correspondence (E-mail:sunzhiqiang1956@sina.com)
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项 (XDA050503030201)、国家自然科学基金(31560189)

Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of Myrica nana in Yunnan, China

Kai-Wen SU¹, Lu-Hong CHEN¹, Wei ZHENG¹, Yao PAN², Hua-Jun YIN³, He-De GONG^1,^*()

¹Ecotourism Faculty, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China

²Asia-Pacific Network For Sustainable Forest Management And Rehabilitation Kunming Training Center, Kunming 650224, China
and
³Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2016-01-17 Accepted:2016-12-25 Online:2017-01-10 Published:2017-01-23
Contact: He-De GONG
About author:KANG Jing-yao(1991-), E-mail: kangjingyao_nj@163.com。

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)在植物生长和各种生理调节机能中发挥着重要作用。为研究云南灌丛生态系统C、N、P含量之间的关系以及植物生物量、土壤C、N、P含量与植物C、N、P含量的相互影响, 该研究采用样地调查的方法, 在云南省云南杨梅(Myrica nana)灌丛主要分布区设立了29个样地, 通过测量样地中云南杨梅灌丛C、N、P含量, 系统分析了云南杨梅C、N、P的计量规律。结果显示: 1)研究区域云南杨梅根茎叶的C、N、P含量的平均值分别是45.94%、0.54%、0.03%, 46.32%、0.58%、0.03%和49.05%、1.70%、0.06% (干质量), 其中叶的C、N、P含量均显著高于茎和根。在根中C:N:P为1531:18:1, 在茎中C:N:P为1544:19:1, 而在叶中C:N:P为818:10:1, 反映了云南杨梅不同部位元素计量不同的分配关系; 2)云南杨梅叶片中C含量和N:P值随生物量的增加而降低, 但只有叶片C含量与生物量的相关关系极显著, 而N:P值与生物量的相关关系不显著。叶片中N含量和P含量随生物量的增加而升高, 其中P含量与生物量的相关关系显著, N含量与生物量的相关关系不显著。云南杨梅叶的N:P (34.2)明显大于8, 说明P是云南杨梅生长的限制因素。3)根的C、N、P含量与土壤中的P含量都有显著的相关性, 其中N、P为极显著正相关, C为显著负相关; 茎的C含量与土壤的C、N、P含量都显著负相关, 且N、P含量的相关性极显著, 而茎的P含量与土壤中的P含量极显著正相关; 叶的P含量与土壤的C、N、P含量都极显著正相关, 叶的C含量则与土壤的P含量极显著负相关。该研究结果可为西南高原灌丛生态系统的研究提供数据支持。

关键词: 云南杨梅, 碳, 氮, 磷, 元素计量, 生物量, 土壤

Abstract:

Aims Carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) play important roles in plant growth and physiological functions. We aimed at exploring the intrinsic relationships of C, N and P in Myrica nana—a common shrub in Yunnan Province—as well as their relationships with pant biomass and soil nutrients.
Methods We measured the concentration of C, N and P of M. nana from 29 sites for their magnitudes and correlations with soil nutrients.
Important findings 1) The arithmetic mean value of C, N and P concentration in the roots, stems and leaves of M. nana was 45.94%, 0.54%, 0.03%, and 46.32%, 0.58%, 0.03%, and 49.05%, 1.70%, 0.06%, respectively. C, N and P concentrations in the leaves were significantly higher than those in the roots and the stems. The C:N:P in roots, stems and leaves was 1531:18:1, 1544:19:1, and 818:10:1, respectively. 2) The C concentration and N:P in leaves of M. nana decreased with the increase of biomass of M. nana; the leaf C concentration was significantly correlated with biomass (p < 0.01), while the correlation between N:P and biomass was not significant (p > 0.05). The leaf N increased with the increase of plant biomass, the P was significantly correlated with biomass (p < 0.05), but the correlation between N concentration and biomass was not significant (p > 0.05). N:P in leaves was 34.2, suggesting that plant growth was limited by P. 3) C, N and P concentration in the roots were significantly correlated with soil P (p < 0.05), with N, P concentrations correlated with soil P positively (p < 0.01) and C negatively (p < 0.05). C concentration in the stems was significantly and negatively correlated with soil C, N, with significant correlation with C, N, and P concentration (p < 0.01). P concentration in the stems was significantly and positively correlated with soil P concentration (p < 0.01), while leaf P significantly and positively correlated with soil C, N and P (p < 0.01); leaf C concentration was significantly and negatively correlated with soil P (p < 0.01).

Key words: Myrica nana, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, stoichiometry, biomass, soil

苏凯文, 陈路红, 郑伟, 潘瑶, 尹华军, 巩合德. 云南杨梅碳、氮、磷化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(1): 136-146. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0026

Kai-Wen SU, Lu-Hong CHEN, Wei ZHENG, Yao PAN, Hua-Jun YIN, He-De GONG. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of Myrica nana in Yunnan, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(1): 136-146. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0026

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2016.0026

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2017/V41/I1/136

图/表 7

参考文献 62

[1]	Aerts R, Beltman B (2003). Is the relation between nutrient supply and biodiversity co-determined by the type of nutrient limitation?Oikos, 101, 489-498.
[2]	Aerts R, Chapin FS III (2000). The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns.Advances in Ecological Research, 30, 1-67.
[3]	Ågren GI (2008). Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities.Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 153-170.
[4]	Chen JQ, Zhang LL, Li J, Wen DZ, Peng ST (2014). Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of two fern species and their relationships to nutrient availability.Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 22, 567-575. (in Chinese with English abstract)[陈嘉茜, 张玲玲, 李炯, 温达志, 彭诗涛 (2014). 蕨类植物碳氮磷化学计量特征及其与土壤养分的关系. 热带亚热带植物学报, 22, 567-575.]
[5]	Cheng JG, Xie ME (2008). The analysis of regional climate change features over Yunnan in recent 50 years.Progress in Geography, 27, 19-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)[程建刚, 解明恩 (2008). 近50年云南区域气候变化特征分析. 地理科学进展, 27, 19-26.]
[6]	Diemer M (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum.Nature, 428, 821-827.
[7]	Ding F, Lian PY, Zeng DH (2011). Characteristics of plant leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in relation to soil nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in Songnen Plain meadow.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 30, 77-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)[丁凡, 廉培勇, 曾德慧 (2011). 松嫩平原草甸三种植物叶片N、P化学计量特征及其与土壤N、P浓度的关系. 生态学杂志, 30, 77-81.]
[8]	Editorial Board of Flora of China， Chinese Academy of Sciences (1979). Flora of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)[中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会 (1979). 中国植物志, 科学出版社, 北京.]
[9]	Ehleringer JR, Field CB (1993). Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
[10]	Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Folarin A, Huberty A, Interlandi S, Kilham SS, McCauley E, Schulz KL (2000a). Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs.Nature, 408, 578-580.
[11]	Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Kerkhoff AJ, Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2010). Biological stoichiometry of plant production: Metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. New Phytologist, 186, 593-608.
[12]	Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Gorokhova E, Fagan WF, Markow TA, Cotner JB, Harrison JF, Hobbie SE, Odell GM, Weider LW (2000b). Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems.Ecology Letters, 3, 540-550.
[13]	Geng Y, Wu Y, He JS (2011). Relationship between leaf phosphorus concentration and soil phosphorus availability across Inner Mongolia grassland.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)[耿燕, 吴漪, 贺金生 (2011). 内蒙古草地叶片磷含量与土壤有效磷的关系. 植物生态学报, 35, 1-8.]
[14]	Gong HD, Cheng XP, Ma YW (2012). Characteristics of biomass distribution in Myrica nana. Nonwood Forest Research, 30(4), 106-108. (in Chinese with English abstract)[巩合德, 程希平, 马月伟 (2012). 云南杨梅灌丛生物量的分配特征. 经济林研究, 30(4), 106-108.]
[15]	Güsewell S (2004). N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: Variation and functional significance.New Phytologist, 164, 243-266.
[16]	Güsewell S (2005). Nutrient resorption of wetland graminoids is related to the type of nutrient limitation.Functional Ecology, 19, 344-354.
[17]	Güsewell S, Bailey KM, Roem WJ, Bedford BL (2005). Nutrient limitation and botanical diversity in wetlands: Can fertilization raise species richness?Oikos, 109, 71-80.
[18]	Han WX, Fang JY, Guo DL, Zhang Y (2005). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China.New Phytologist, 168, 377-385.
[19]	Han WX, Tang LY, Chen YH, Fang JY (2013). Relationship between the relative limitation and resorption efficiency of nitrogen vs phosphorus in woody plants. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e83366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083366.
[20]	Han WX, Wu Q, Tang LY, Chen YH, Li LP, He JS, Fang JY (2009). Leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across plant species in Beijing and its periphery.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensi, 45, 855-860. (in Chinese with English abstract)[韩文轩, 吴漪, 汤璐瑛, 陈雅涵, 李利平, 贺金生, 方精云 (2009). 北京及周边地区植物叶的碳氮磷元素计量特征. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 45, 855-860.]
[21]	Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Cleland EE, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Bracken MES, Elser JJ, Gruner DS, Hillebrand H, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2011). Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities.Ecology Letters, 14, 852-862.
[22]	He JJ, Cai GQ, Tian L, Fang HY (2010). Effect of vegetation measures on the soil conservation and factors analysis.Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 41, 706-710. (in Chinese with English abstract)[和继军, 蔡国强, 田磊, 方海燕 (2010). 植被措施对土壤保育的作用及其影响因素分析. 土壤通报, 41, 706-710.]
[23]	He JS, Wang L, Flynn DF, Wang XP, Ma WH, Fang JY (2008). Leaf nitrogen:phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes.Oecologia, 155, 301-10.
[24]	Hong JT, Wu JB, Wang XD (2013). Effects of global climate change on the C, N, and P stoichiometry of terrestrial plants.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 2658-2665. (in Chinese with English abstract)[洪江涛, 吴建波, 王小丹 (2013). 全球气候变化对陆地植物碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 24, 2658-2665.]
[25]	Hou XY (1982). Chinese Vegetation Geology and Chemical Content of Dominant Plants. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)[侯学煜 (1982). 中国植被地理及优势植物化学成分. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[26]	Huguet V, Batzli JM, Zimpfer JF, Normand P, Dawson JO, Fernandez MP (2001). Diversity and specificity of Frankia strains in nodules of sympatric Myrica gale, Alnus incana, and Shepherdia canadensis determined by rrs gene poly- morphism. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 2116-2122.
[27]	Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbágy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH (2002). Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands.Nature, 418, 623-626.
[28]	Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation.Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450.
[29]	Li J, Shi YL, Chen ZW (2011). Research on phosphorus in southern red soils of in China.Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 42, 763-768. (in Chinese with English abstract)[李杰, 石元亮, 陈智文 (2011). 我国南方红壤磷素研究概况. 土壤通报, 42, 763-768.]
[30]	Liu GH, Ma KM, Fu BJ, Guan WB, Kang YX, Zhou JY, Liu SL (2003). Above ground biomass of main shrubs in dry valley of Minjing river. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23, 1757-1764. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘国华, 马克明, 傅伯杰, 关文彬, 康永祥, 周建云, 刘世梁(2003). 岷江干旱河谷主要灌丛类型地上生物量研究. 生态学报, 23, 1757-1764.]
[31]	Marschner H (1995). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, New York.
[32]	Mcgroddy ME, Daufresne T, Hedin LO (2004). Scaling of C:N:P stoichiometry in forests worldwide: Implications of terrestrial Redfield-type ratios.Ecology, 85, 2390-2401.
[33]	Niklas KJ, Owens T, Reich P, Cobb ED (2005). Nitrogen/ phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth.Ecology Letters, 8, 636-642.
[34]	Niu DC, Li Q, Jiang SG, Chang PJ, Fu H (2013). Seasonal variations of leaf C:N:P stoichiometry of six shrubs in desert of China’s Alxa Plateau.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 317-325. (in Chinese with English abstract)[牛得草, 李茜, 江世高, 常佩静, 傅华 (2013). 阿拉善荒漠区6种主要灌木植物叶片C:N:P化学计量比的季节变化. 植物生态学报, 37, 317-325.]
[35]	Pan J, Song NP, Wu XD, Yang XG, Chen L, Qu WJ (2015). Effects of different planting-years of artificial Caragana intermedia shrubs on soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry characteristics in desert steppe. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 41, 160-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)[潘军, 宋乃平, 吴旭东, 杨新国, 陈林, 曲文杰 (2015). 荒漠草原不同种植年限人工柠条林土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 41, 160-168.]
[36]	Pan P, Gan WF, Ouyang XZ, Xiao X (2014). Relationship between the contents of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and soil organic carbon density ofPinus massoniana nature forest. Journal of Northwest Forest University, 29(6), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)[潘鹏, 甘文峰, 欧阳勋志, 肖欣 (2014). 马尾松天然林土壤碳氮磷含量与碳密度的关系. 西北林学院学报, 29(6), 1-5.]
[37]	Ren SJ, Yu GR, Jiang CM, Fang HJ, Sun XM (2012). Stoichiometric characteristics of leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of 102 dominant species in forest ecosystems along the North-South Transect of East China.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 23, 119-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)[任书杰, 于贵瑞, 姜春明, 方华军, 孙晓敏 (2012). 中国东部南北样带森林生态系统102个优势种叶片碳氮磷化学计量学统计特征. 应用生态学报, 23, 119-124.]
[38]	Shao XX, Li WH, Wu M, Yang WY, Jiang KY, Ye XQ (2013). Dynamics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus storage of three dominant marsh plants in Hangzhou Bay coastal wetland.Environmental Science, 4, 3451-3457. (in Chinese with English abstract)[邵学新, 李文华, 吴明, 杨文英, 蒋科毅, 叶小齐 (2013). 杭州湾潮滩湿地3种优势植物碳氮磷储量特征研究. 环境科学, 4, 3451-3457.]
[39]	Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[40]	Sturm M, Racine CH, Tape KD (2001). Increasing shrub abundance in the arctic.Nature, 411, 546-547.
[41]	van de Waal DB, Verschoor AM, Verspagen JMH, van Donk E, Huisman J (2010). Climate-driven changes in the ecological stoichiometry of aquatic ecosystems.Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 8, 145-152.
[42]	van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, van Straalen NM (2008). The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems.Ecology Letters, 11, 296-310.
[43]	Venterink HO, Wassen MJ, Verkroost AWM, de Ruiter PC (2003). Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands.Ecology, 84, 2191-2199.
[44]	Vitousek PM (1982). Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency.American Naturalist, 119, 553-573.
[45]	Vitousek PM, Farrington H (1997). Nutrient limitation and soil development: Experimental test of a biogeochemical theory.Biogeochemistry, 37, 63-75.
[46]	von Oheimb G, Power SA, Falk K, Friedrich U, Mohamed A, Krug A, Boschatzke N, Härdtle W (2010). N:P ratio and the nature of nutrient limitation in Calluna-dominated heathlands. Ecosystems, 13, 317-327.
[47]	Wang HY, Huang WN (1992). Characteristics of symbiotic nitrogen fixation byMyrica rubra. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(2), 48-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王慧英, 黄维南 (1992). 杨梅根瘤的共生固氮特性. 福建农业学报, 7(2), 48-52.]
[48]	Wang JY, Wang SQ, Li RL, Yan JH, Sha LQ, Han SJ (2011). C:N:P stoichiometric characteristics of four forest types’ dominant tree species in China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 587-595. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王晶苑, 王绍强, 李纫兰, 闫俊华, 沙丽清, 韩士杰 (2011). 中国四种森林类型主要优势植物的C:N:P化学计量学特征. 植物生态学报, 35, 587-595.]
[49]	Wang SQ, Yu GR (2008). Ecological stoichiometry charac- teristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 8, 3937-3947. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王绍强, 于贵瑞 (2008). 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征. 生态学报, 8, 3937-3947.]
[50]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M (2001). Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats.Functional Ecology, 15, 423-434.
[51]	Wu PF, Ma QX (2009). Research advances in the mechanisms of high nutrient use efficiency in plants.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29, 427-437. (in Chinese with English abstract)[吴鹏飞, 马祥庆 (2009). 植物养分高效利用机制研究进展. 生态学报, 29, 427-437.]
[52]	Wu XL, Gu XP (1994). A study on the characteristics ofMyrica rubra in nodulation and nitrogen fixation. Forest Research, 3, 306-310. (in Chinese with English abstract)[吴晓丽, 顾小平 (1994). 杨梅结瘤固氮特性研究. 林业科学研究, 3, 306-310.]
[53]	Xie HT, He XD, You WX, Yu D, Liu HF, Wang JL, Gu S, Nie QH, Liang YT, Zhang JL (2016). Effects of ecological stoichiometry on biomass and species diversity of the Artemisia ordosica community in Habahu National Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 3621-3627. (in Chinese with English abstract)[颉洪涛, 何兴东, 尤万学, 余殿, 刘惠芬, 王金龙, 古松, 聂庆华, 梁玉婷, 张京磊 (2016). 哈巴湖国家级自然保护区油蒿群落生态化学计量特征对群落生物量和物种多样性的影响. 生态学报, 36, 3621-3627.]
[54]	Yan BG, Liu GC, Fan B, He GX, Shi LT, Li JC, Ji ZH (2015). Relationships between plant stoichiometry and biomass in an arid-hot valley, Southwest China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 807-815. (in Chinese with English abstract)[闫帮国, 刘刚才, 樊博, 何光熊, 史亮涛, 李纪潮, 纪中华 (2015). 干热河谷植物化学计量特征与生物量之间的关系. 植物生态学报, 35, 807-815.]
[55]	Yan ZB, Kim NY, Han TS, Fang JY, Han WY (2013). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of Arabidopsis thaliana. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 551-557. (in Chinese with English abstract)[严正兵, 金南瑛, 韩廷申, 方精云, 韩文轩 (2013). 氮磷施肥对拟南芥叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响. 植物生态学报, 37, 551-557.]
[56]	Yin XR, Liang CZ, Wang LX, Wang W, Liu ZL, Liu XP (2010). Ecological stoichiometry of plant nutrients at different restoration succession stages in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 39-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)[银晓瑞, 梁存柱, 王立新, 王炜, 刘钟龄, 刘小平 (2010). 内蒙古典型草原不同恢复演替阶段植物养分化学计量学. 植物生态学报, 34, 39-47.]
[57]	Zeng DH, Chen GS (2005). Ecological stoichiometry: A science to explore the complexity of living systems.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 29, 1007-1019. (in Chinese with English abstract)[曾德慧, 陈广生 (2005). 生态化学计量学:复杂生命系统奥秘的探索. 植物生态学报, 29, 1007-1019.]
[58]	Zhang WY, Fan JW, Zhong HP, Hu ZM, Song LL, Wang N (2010). The nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry of different plant functional groups for dominant species of typical steppes in China.Acta Agrestia Sinica, 18, 503-509. (in Chinese with English abstract)[张文彦, 樊江文, 钟华平, 胡中民, 宋璐璐, 王宁 (2010). 中国典型草原优势植物功能群氮磷化学计量学特征研究. 草地学报, 18, 503-509.]
[59]	Zhao Q, Zeng DH (2005). Phosphorus cycling in terrestrial ecosystems and its controlling factors.Acta Phytoe- cologica Sinica, 29, 153-163. (in Chinese with English abstract)[赵琼, 曾德慧 (2005). 陆地生态系统磷素循环及其影响因素. 植物生态学报, 29, 153-163.]
[60]	Zhao QG, Huang GQ, Ma YQ (2013). The problems in red soil ecosystem in southern of China and its countermeasures.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 7615-7622. (in Chinese with English abstract)[赵其国, 黄国勤, 马艳芹 (2013). 中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策. 生态学报, 33, 7615-7622.]
[61]	Zheng S, Shangguan Z (2007). Spatial patterns of leaf nutrient traits of the plants in the Loess Plateau of China.Trees, 21, 357-370.
[62]	Zheng WJ, Bao WK, Gu B, He X, Leng L (2007). Carbon concentration and its characteristics in terrestrial higher plant.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26, 307-313. (in Chinese with English abstract)[郑帷婕, 包维楷, 辜彬, 何晓, 冷俐 (2007). 陆生高等植物碳含量及其特点. 生态学杂志, 26, 307-313.]

样地编号 Site number	样地地点 Site location	纬度 Latitude (N)	经度 Longitude (E)	海拔 Altitude (m)
YN002	云南省姚安县 Yao’an,Yunnan	25.52°	101.40°	2 220.6
YN003	云南省姚安县 Yao’an,Yunnan	25.49°	101.31°	2 623.1
YN004	云南省姚安县 Yao’an,Yunnan	25.50°	101.15°	2 093.3
YN006	云南省大姚县 Dayao,Yunnan	25.66°	101.15°	2 258.6
YN010	云南省大姚县 Dayao,Yunnan	25.71°	101.48°	2 120.4
YN011	云南省大姚县 Dayao,Yunnan	25.91°	101.23°	2 396.0
YN013	云南省牟定县 Mouding,Yunnan	25.45°	101.46°	2 037.9
YN016	云南省牟定县 Mouding,Yunnan	25.44°	101.53°	2 145.2
YN017	云南省牟定县 Mouding,Yunnan	25.45°	101.63°	2 245.0
YN018	云南省南华县 Nanhua,Yunnan	25.33°	101.03°	2 567.2
YN019	云南省南华县 Nanhua,Yunnan	25.17°	101.06°	2 392.4
YN020	云南省南华县 Nanhua,Yunnan	25.32°	101.26°	2 148.2
YN022	云南省禄丰县 Lufeng,Yunnan	25.31°	102.12°	2 113.1
YN024	云南省禄丰县 Lufeng,Yunnan	25.31°	101.90°	2 199.1
YN025	云南省禄丰县 Lufeng,Yunnan	25.32°	101.87°	2 272.3
YN026	云南省安宁县 Anning,Yunnan	24.86°	102.45°	2 043.8
YN027	云南省安宁县 Anning,Yunnan	24.82°	102.42°	2 123.4
YN028	云南省安宁县 Anning,Yunnan	24.85°	102.39°	1 950.0
YN029	云南省昆明市 Kunming,Yunnan	25.14°	102.61°	2 183.4
YN030	云南省嵩明县 Songming,Yunnan	25.41°	103.04°	2 084.8
YN038	云南省昆明市 Kunming,Yunnan	25.22°	102.66°	2 137.5
YN039	云南省富民县 Fumin,Yunnan	25.23°	102.42°	2 086.0
YN040	云南省富民县 Fumin,Yunnan	25.28°	102.63°	2 214.7
YN041	云南省寻甸县 Xundian,Yunnan	25.54°	103.39°	2 060.9
YN044	云南省寻甸县 Xundian,Yunnan	25.52°	103.38°	2 008.0
YN050	云南省会泽县 Huize,Yunnan	26.47°	103.46°	2 040.0
YN052	云南省会泽县 Huize,Yunnan	26.50°	103.45°	2 010.0
YN058	云南省师宗县 Shizong,Yunnan	24.91°	103.87°	2 156.0
YN068	云南省砚山县 Yanshan,Yunnan	23.77°	104.68°	1 656.0

样地编号 Site number	样地地点 Site location	纬度 Latitude (N)	经度 Longitude (E)	海拔 Altitude (m)
YN002	云南省姚安县 Yao’an,Yunnan	25.52°	101.40°	2 220.6
YN003	云南省姚安县 Yao’an,Yunnan	25.49°	101.31°	2 623.1
YN004	云南省姚安县 Yao’an,Yunnan	25.50°	101.15°	2 093.3
YN006	云南省大姚县 Dayao,Yunnan	25.66°	101.15°	2 258.6
YN010	云南省大姚县 Dayao,Yunnan	25.71°	101.48°	2 120.4
YN011	云南省大姚县 Dayao,Yunnan	25.91°	101.23°	2 396.0
YN013	云南省牟定县 Mouding,Yunnan	25.45°	101.46°	2 037.9
YN016	云南省牟定县 Mouding,Yunnan	25.44°	101.53°	2 145.2
YN017	云南省牟定县 Mouding,Yunnan	25.45°	101.63°	2 245.0
YN018	云南省南华县 Nanhua,Yunnan	25.33°	101.03°	2 567.2
YN019	云南省南华县 Nanhua,Yunnan	25.17°	101.06°	2 392.4
YN020	云南省南华县 Nanhua,Yunnan	25.32°	101.26°	2 148.2
YN022	云南省禄丰县 Lufeng,Yunnan	25.31°	102.12°	2 113.1
YN024	云南省禄丰县 Lufeng,Yunnan	25.31°	101.90°	2 199.1
YN025	云南省禄丰县 Lufeng,Yunnan	25.32°	101.87°	2 272.3
YN026	云南省安宁县 Anning,Yunnan	24.86°	102.45°	2 043.8
YN027	云南省安宁县 Anning,Yunnan	24.82°	102.42°	2 123.4
YN028	云南省安宁县 Anning,Yunnan	24.85°	102.39°	1 950.0
YN029	云南省昆明市 Kunming,Yunnan	25.14°	102.61°	2 183.4
YN030	云南省嵩明县 Songming,Yunnan	25.41°	103.04°	2 084.8
YN038	云南省昆明市 Kunming,Yunnan	25.22°	102.66°	2 137.5
YN039	云南省富民县 Fumin,Yunnan	25.23°	102.42°	2 086.0
YN040	云南省富民县 Fumin,Yunnan	25.28°	102.63°	2 214.7
YN041	云南省寻甸县 Xundian,Yunnan	25.54°	103.39°	2 060.9
YN044	云南省寻甸县 Xundian,Yunnan	25.52°	103.38°	2 008.0
YN050	云南省会泽县 Huize,Yunnan	26.47°	103.46°	2 040.0
YN052	云南省会泽县 Huize,Yunnan	26.50°	103.45°	2 010.0
YN058	云南省师宗县 Shizong,Yunnan	24.91°	103.87°	2 156.0
YN068	云南省砚山县 Yanshan,Yunnan	23.77°	104.68°	1 656.0

变量 Variable		数量 Number	平均值 Mean (%)	中值 Median (%)	标偏差 Standard deviation	最大值 Maximum (%)	最小值 Minimum (%)
C	根 Root	84	45.94	46.03	1.05	47.83	40.96
	茎 Shoot	83	46.32	46.48	0.69	47.74	43.89
	叶 Leaf	84	49.05	49.25	1.03	51.03	43.97
N	根 Root	84	0.54	0.54	0.86	0.82	0.38
	茎 Shoot	84	0.58	0.56	0.12	0.93	0.40
	叶 Leaf	84	1.70	1.73	0.23	2.15	0.29
P	根 Root	84	0.03	0.02	0.03	0.11	0.01
	茎 Shoot	84	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.09	0.01
	叶 Leaf	84	0.06	0.05	0.02	0.14	0.03

变量 Variable		数量 Number	平均值 Mean (%)	中值 Median (%)	标偏差 Standard deviation	最大值 Maximum (%)	最小值 Minimum (%)
C	根 Root	84	45.94	46.03	1.05	47.83	40.96
	茎 Shoot	83	46.32	46.48	0.69	47.74	43.89
	叶 Leaf	84	49.05	49.25	1.03	51.03	43.97
N	根 Root	84	0.54	0.54	0.86	0.82	0.38
	茎 Shoot	84	0.58	0.56	0.12	0.93	0.40
	叶 Leaf	84	1.70	1.73	0.23	2.15	0.29
P	根 Root	84	0.03	0.02	0.03	0.11	0.01
	茎 Shoot	84	0.03	0.02	0.02	0.09	0.01
	叶 Leaf	84	0.06	0.05	0.02	0.14	0.03

部位 Part	变量 Variable	数量 Number	平均值 Mean	最大值 Maximum	最小值 Minimum	标准偏差 Standard Deviation
根 Root	C:N	84	86.6	120.0	57.1	13.5
	C:P	84	2 559.8	5 189.6	419.7	1 494.8
	N:P	84	29.6	70.0	5.1	17.1
茎 Stem	C:N	83	82.2	116.3	49.9	14.5
	C:P	83	2 656.2	7 235.8	514.4	1 515.5
	N:P	83	31.9	83.76	4.95	16.7
叶 Leaf	C:N	84	30.4	153.9	23.1	14.1
	C:P	84	1 012.9	1 918.7	340.6	322.3
	N:P	84	34.2	64.6	9.1	9.8

云南杨梅碳、氮、磷化学计量特征

Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of Myrica nana in Yunnan, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 62

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

部位 Part	项目 Element	根 Root			茎 Stem			叶 Leaf
部位 Part	项目 Element	C	N	P	C	N	P	C	N	P
根 Root	C	1	-0.025	-0.020	0.43^**	-0.03	-0.10	0.43^**	-0.09	-0.27^*
	N		1	0.080	-0.27^*	0.20	0.25^*	-0.23^*	0.20	0.42^**
	P			1	-0.28^*	-0.13	0.58^**	-0.27^*	0.05	0.42^**
茎 Stem	C				1	0.14	-0.53^**	0.65^**	0.01	-0.57^**
	N					1	0.18	-0.11	0.25^*	0.06
	P						1	-0.45^**	0.05	0.49^**
叶 Leaf	C							1	0.18	-0.47^**
	N								1	0.43^**
	P									1

	元素 Element	根 Root			茎 Stem			叶 Leaf
	元素 Element	C	N	P	C	N	P	C	N	P
表层土 Top soil	C	-0.09	0.10	0.14	-0.25^*	-0.11	0.10	-0.07	0.16	0.29^**
	N	-0.16	0.15	0.16	-0.29^**	-0.02	0.16	-0.17	0.18	0.31^**
	P	-0.27^*	0.33^**	0.32^**	-0.39^**	0.07	0.57^**	-0.39^**	0.21	0.46^**

[1]	席念勋张原野周淑荣. 群落生态学中的植物-土壤反馈研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(预发表): 0-0.
[2]	李小玲朱道明余玉蓉吴浩牟利洪柳刘雪飞卜贵军薛丹吴林. 模拟氮沉降对鄂西南贫营养泥炭地两种藓类植物生长与分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(预发表): 0-0.
[3]	罗来聪赖晓琴白健李爱新方海富唐明胡冬南张令. 氮添加背景下土壤真菌和细菌对不同种源入侵植物乌桕生长特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(预发表): 0-0.
[4]	王晓悦许艺馨李春环余海龙黄菊莹. 长期降水量变化下荒漠草原植物生物量、多样性及其影响因素研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[5]	雷自然贾国栋余新晓刘子赫. 植物水分来源稳定氢氧同位素偏移研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[6]	李变变张凤华赵亚光孙秉楠. 不同刈割程度对油莎豆非结构性碳水化合物代谢以及生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[7]	张慧曾文静龚新桃马泽清. 亚热带典型树种根毛特征及其共生真菌关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[8]	姚萌康荣华王盎马方园李靳台子晗方运霆. 利用15N示踪技术研究乔木幼苗对NO2的吸收与分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[9]	杨元合张典业魏斌刘洋冯雪徽毛超徐玮婕贺美王璐郑志虎王媛媛陈蕾伊彭云峰. 草地群落多样性和生态系统碳氮循环对氮输入的非线性响应及其机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[10]	党宏忠, 张学利, 韩辉, 石长春, 葛玉祥, 马全林, 陈帅, 刘春颖. 樟子松固沙林林水关系研究进展及对营林实践的指导[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 971-983.
[11]	李万年, 罗益敏, 黄则月, 杨梅. 望天树人工幼林混交对土壤微生物功能多样性与碳源利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1109-1124.
[12]	李一丁, 桑清田, 张灏, 刘龙昌, 潘庆民, 王宇, 刘伟, 袁文平. 内蒙古半干旱地区空气和土壤加湿对幼龄樟子松生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1077-1085.
[13]	伍敏, 田雨, 樊大勇, 张祥雪. 干旱胁迫下毛白杨和元宝槭的水力学调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1086-1097.
[14]	董六文, 任正炜, 张蕊, 谢晨笛, 周小龙. 功能多样性比物种多样性更好解释氮添加对高寒草地生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 871-881.
[15]	冯继广, 张秋芳, 袁霞, 朱彪. 氮磷添加对土壤有机碳的影响: 进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 855-870.