植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 661-670.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.005 cstr: 32100.14.j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.005
唐罗忠1,*(
), 刘志龙1, 虞木奎2, 方升佐1, 赵丹1, 王子寅1
收稿日期:2009-03-02
接受日期:2010-03-05
出版日期:2010-03-02
发布日期:2010-06-01
作者简介:* E-mail: tangluozhong@yahoo.com.cn
TANG Luo-Zhong1,*(
), LIU Zhi-Long1, YU Mu-Kui2, FANG Sheng-Zuo1, ZHAO Dan1, WANG Zi-Yin1
Received:2009-03-02
Accepted:2010-03-05
Online:2010-03-02
Published:2010-06-01
摘要:
麻栎(Quercus acutissima)是一种分布广、用途大、耐干旱瘠薄的乔木树种, 掌握其生长规律和养分利用特性对麻栎人工林的科学经营十分必要。对安徽省滁州市红琊山林场两种立地条件下的麻栎人工林的生长和养分状况进行了对比研究, 结果表明: 在土壤含石量较高、养分含量较少的立地条件下, 12年生的麻栎人工林地上部分生物量为49 180.2 kg·hm-2; 林木养分总累积量为633.9 kg·hm-2, 其中N、P、K、Ca、Mg的累积量分别为119.9、18.7、88.5、368.6和38.2 kg·hm-2。在土壤含石量较少、养分含量较高的立地条件下, 12年生麻栎人工林地上部分生物量为90 774.8 kg·hm-2; 林木养分总累积量为993.6 kg·hm-2, 其中N、P、K、Ca、Mg的累积量分别为203.5、23.0、146.9、553.6和66.6 kg·hm-2。所以, 立地条件对麻栎生长和养分累积具有显著影响。较差立地条件下的麻栎对土壤养分的富集系数较大, 但其凋落物的养分含量较低。研究显示, 麻栎可以通过养分奢侈吸收、提高养分内循环、减少养分损失等途径来适应低养分环境。
唐罗忠, 刘志龙, 虞木奎, 方升佐, 赵丹, 王子寅. 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林地上部分养分的积累和分配. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 661-670. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.005
TANG Luo-Zhong, LIU Zhi-Long, YU Mu-Kui, FANG Sheng-Zuo, ZHAO Dan, WANG Zi-Yin. Nutrient accumulation and allocation of aboveground parts in Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions in Anhui, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6): 661-670. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.005
| 立地 Site | 密度 Density (tree·hm-2) | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 树高 Tree height (m) | 林分生物量 Stand biomass (kg·hm-2) | 生产力 Productivity (kg·hm-2·a-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 叶 Leaf | 枝 Branch | 干 Stem | 皮 Bark | 总计 Total | |||||
| A | 4 619 ± 341a | 6.2 ± 0.3a | 6.9 ± 0.2a | 5 300.3 ± 314.6a | 8 899.1 ± 687.7a | 27 682.2 ± 1 407.5a | 7 298.6 ± 436.8a | 49 180.2 ± 3 677.6a | 4 098.4 ± 306.5a |
| B | 2 567 ± 231b | 9.1 ± 0.5b | 10.3 ± 0.4b | 9 296.4 ± 477.8b | 19 902.6 ± 1 423.5b | 51 378.0 ± 2 721.2b | 10 197.8 ± 779.5b | 90 774.8 ± 5 264.7b | 7 564.6 ± 438.7b |
表1 两种立地条件下12年生麻栎人工林生长量(平均值±标准偏差, n = 3)
Table 1 Growth of 12-year-old Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions (means ± SD, n = 3)
| 立地 Site | 密度 Density (tree·hm-2) | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 树高 Tree height (m) | 林分生物量 Stand biomass (kg·hm-2) | 生产力 Productivity (kg·hm-2·a-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 叶 Leaf | 枝 Branch | 干 Stem | 皮 Bark | 总计 Total | |||||
| A | 4 619 ± 341a | 6.2 ± 0.3a | 6.9 ± 0.2a | 5 300.3 ± 314.6a | 8 899.1 ± 687.7a | 27 682.2 ± 1 407.5a | 7 298.6 ± 436.8a | 49 180.2 ± 3 677.6a | 4 098.4 ± 306.5a |
| B | 2 567 ± 231b | 9.1 ± 0.5b | 10.3 ± 0.4b | 9 296.4 ± 477.8b | 19 902.6 ± 1 423.5b | 51 378.0 ± 2 721.2b | 10 197.8 ± 779.5b | 90 774.8 ± 5 264.7b | 7 564.6 ± 438.7b |
| 组分 Component | 立地 Site | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计 Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g·kg-1) | |||||||
| 叶 | A | 10.57 ± 1.01a | 0.96 ± 0.04a | 5.49 ± 0.52a | 12.19 ± 1.16a | 2.06 ± 0.31a | 31.27 |
| Leaf | B | 10.44 ± 1.50a | 0.76 ± 0.08b | 5.58 ± 0.67a | 10.67 ± 0.61a | 2.35 ± 0.28a | 29.80 |
| A/B | 1.01 | 1.27 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 1.05 | |
| 枝 | A | 1.62 ± 0.23a | 0.45 ± 0.08a | 1.94 ± 0.24a | 8.42 ± 0.53a | 0.64 ± 0.09a | 13.07 |
| Branch | B | 1.37 ± 0.08a | 0.26 ± 0.05b | 1.41 ± 0.02b | 6.74 ± 0.83b | 0.61 ± 0.08a | 10.39 |
| A/B | 1.19 | 1.73 | 1.38 | 1.25 | 1.04 | 1.26 | |
| 干 | A | 0.97 ± 0.08a | 0.29 ± 0.06a | 1.12 ± 0.06a | 3.91 ± 0.65a | 0.56 ± 0.05a | 6.84 |
| Stem | B | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.17 ± 0.04b | 0.96 ± 0.07b | 2.27 ± 0.18b | 0.42 ± 0.06b | 4.72 |
| A/B | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.17 | 1.72 | 1.34 | 1.45 | |
| 皮 | A | 3.10 ± 0.20a | 0.21 ± 0.03a | 1.52 ± 0.09a | 16.57 ± 1.26a | 0.84 ± 0.16a | 22.24 |
| Bark | B | 3.18 ± 0.58a | 0.22 ± 0.03a | 1.75 ± 0.22a | 19.95 ± 1.78a | 1.10 ± 0.13a | 26.19 |
| A/B | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.85 | |
| 凋落物 | A | 7.26 ± 1.30a | 0.51 ± 0.05a | 1.23 ± 0.14a | 18.61 ± 2.10a | 1.34 ± 0.14a | 28.94 |
| Litter | B | 7.71 ± 0.63a | 0.60 ± 0.09a | 1.71 ± 0.21b | 23.99 ± 3.12a | 1.53 ± 0.05a | 35.53 |
| A/B | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.81 | |
| 土壤 | A | 0.38 ± 0.06a | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 5.38 ± 0.39a | 2.91 ± 0.45a | 1.95 ± 0.16a | 10.69 |
| Soil | B | 0.79 ± 0.13b | 0.16 ± 0.03b | 8.86 ± 0.57b | 3.42 ± 0.55a | 4.36 ± 0.31b | 17.60 |
| A/B | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.45 | 0.61 | |
表2 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林各组分养分含量(平均值±标准偏差, n = 3)
Table 2 Nutrient concentrations in different components of Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions (means ± SD, n = 3)
| 组分 Component | 立地 Site | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计 Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g·kg-1) | |||||||
| 叶 | A | 10.57 ± 1.01a | 0.96 ± 0.04a | 5.49 ± 0.52a | 12.19 ± 1.16a | 2.06 ± 0.31a | 31.27 |
| Leaf | B | 10.44 ± 1.50a | 0.76 ± 0.08b | 5.58 ± 0.67a | 10.67 ± 0.61a | 2.35 ± 0.28a | 29.80 |
| A/B | 1.01 | 1.27 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 1.05 | |
| 枝 | A | 1.62 ± 0.23a | 0.45 ± 0.08a | 1.94 ± 0.24a | 8.42 ± 0.53a | 0.64 ± 0.09a | 13.07 |
| Branch | B | 1.37 ± 0.08a | 0.26 ± 0.05b | 1.41 ± 0.02b | 6.74 ± 0.83b | 0.61 ± 0.08a | 10.39 |
| A/B | 1.19 | 1.73 | 1.38 | 1.25 | 1.04 | 1.26 | |
| 干 | A | 0.97 ± 0.08a | 0.29 ± 0.06a | 1.12 ± 0.06a | 3.91 ± 0.65a | 0.56 ± 0.05a | 6.84 |
| Stem | B | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.17 ± 0.04b | 0.96 ± 0.07b | 2.27 ± 0.18b | 0.42 ± 0.06b | 4.72 |
| A/B | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.17 | 1.72 | 1.34 | 1.45 | |
| 皮 | A | 3.10 ± 0.20a | 0.21 ± 0.03a | 1.52 ± 0.09a | 16.57 ± 1.26a | 0.84 ± 0.16a | 22.24 |
| Bark | B | 3.18 ± 0.58a | 0.22 ± 0.03a | 1.75 ± 0.22a | 19.95 ± 1.78a | 1.10 ± 0.13a | 26.19 |
| A/B | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.85 | |
| 凋落物 | A | 7.26 ± 1.30a | 0.51 ± 0.05a | 1.23 ± 0.14a | 18.61 ± 2.10a | 1.34 ± 0.14a | 28.94 |
| Litter | B | 7.71 ± 0.63a | 0.60 ± 0.09a | 1.71 ± 0.21b | 23.99 ± 3.12a | 1.53 ± 0.05a | 35.53 |
| A/B | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.81 | |
| 土壤 | A | 0.38 ± 0.06a | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 5.38 ± 0.39a | 2.91 ± 0.45a | 1.95 ± 0.16a | 10.69 |
| Soil | B | 0.79 ± 0.13b | 0.16 ± 0.03b | 8.86 ± 0.57b | 3.42 ± 0.55a | 4.36 ± 0.31b | 17.60 |
| A/B | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.45 | 0.61 | |
| 立地 Site | 组分 Component | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kg·hm-2) | |||||||
| A | 叶 Leaf | 56.0 | 5.1 | 29.1 | 64.6 | 10.9 | 165.7 |
| 枝 Branch | 14.4 | 4.0 | 17.3 | 74.9 | 5.7 | 116.3 | |
| 干 Stem | 26.8 | 8.1 | 31.0 | 108.2 | 15.4 | 189.5 | |
| 皮 Bark | 22.7 | 1.5 | 11.1 | 120.9 | 6.1 | 162.3 | |
| 小计 Sum | 119.9 | 18.7 | 88.5 | 368.6 | 38.2 | 633.9 | |
| 凋落物 Litter | 46.5 | 3.3 | 7.8 | 119.1 | 8.6 | 185.2 | |
| 土壤 Soil | 724.3 | 141.8 | 10 304.8 | 5 583.5 | 3 732.6 | 20 487.0 | |
| 总计 Total | 890.7 | 163.8 | 10 401.1 | 6 071.2 | 3 779.4 | 21 306.1 | |
| B | 叶 Leaf | 97.0 | 7.1 | 51.9 | 99.3 | 21.8 | 277.1 |
| 枝 Branch | 27.2 | 5.2 | 28.0 | 134.2 | 12.2 | 206.7 | |
| 干 Stem | 46.8 | 8.5 | 49.1 | 116.7 | 21.4 | 242.6 | |
| 皮 Bark | 32.4 | 2.2 | 17.8 | 203.5 | 11.2 | 267.2 | |
| 小计 Sum | 203.5 | 23.0 | 146.9 | 553.6 | 66.6 | 993.6 | |
| 凋落物 Litter | 70.9 | 5.5 | 15.7 | 220.7 | 14.1 | 326.9 | |
| 土壤 Soil | 2 396.8 | 492.7 | 26 782.4 | 10 343.0 | 13 166.0 | 53 180.9 | |
| 总计 Total | 2 671.2 | 521.2 | 26 945.0 | 11 117.3 | 13 246.7 | 54 501.4 | |
表3 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林养分积累量与分配
Table 3 Accumulation and allocation of nutrient in different components of Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions
| 立地 Site | 组分 Component | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kg·hm-2) | |||||||
| A | 叶 Leaf | 56.0 | 5.1 | 29.1 | 64.6 | 10.9 | 165.7 |
| 枝 Branch | 14.4 | 4.0 | 17.3 | 74.9 | 5.7 | 116.3 | |
| 干 Stem | 26.8 | 8.1 | 31.0 | 108.2 | 15.4 | 189.5 | |
| 皮 Bark | 22.7 | 1.5 | 11.1 | 120.9 | 6.1 | 162.3 | |
| 小计 Sum | 119.9 | 18.7 | 88.5 | 368.6 | 38.2 | 633.9 | |
| 凋落物 Litter | 46.5 | 3.3 | 7.8 | 119.1 | 8.6 | 185.2 | |
| 土壤 Soil | 724.3 | 141.8 | 10 304.8 | 5 583.5 | 3 732.6 | 20 487.0 | |
| 总计 Total | 890.7 | 163.8 | 10 401.1 | 6 071.2 | 3 779.4 | 21 306.1 | |
| B | 叶 Leaf | 97.0 | 7.1 | 51.9 | 99.3 | 21.8 | 277.1 |
| 枝 Branch | 27.2 | 5.2 | 28.0 | 134.2 | 12.2 | 206.7 | |
| 干 Stem | 46.8 | 8.5 | 49.1 | 116.7 | 21.4 | 242.6 | |
| 皮 Bark | 32.4 | 2.2 | 17.8 | 203.5 | 11.2 | 267.2 | |
| 小计 Sum | 203.5 | 23.0 | 146.9 | 553.6 | 66.6 | 993.6 | |
| 凋落物 Litter | 70.9 | 5.5 | 15.7 | 220.7 | 14.1 | 326.9 | |
| 土壤 Soil | 2 396.8 | 492.7 | 26 782.4 | 10 343.0 | 13 166.0 | 53 180.9 | |
| 总计 Total | 2 671.2 | 521.2 | 26 945.0 | 11 117.3 | 13 246.7 | 54 501.4 | |
| 立地 Site | 器官 Organ | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 平均值 Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 叶 Leaf | 27.95 | 12.99 | 1.02 | 4.18 | 1.06 | 9.44 |
| 枝 Branch | 4.29 | 6.07 | 0.36 | 2.89 | 0.33 | 2.79 | |
| 干 Stem | 2.56 | 3.97 | 0.21 | 1.34 | 0.29 | 1.67 | |
| 皮 Bark | 8.21 | 2.78 | 0.28 | 5.69 | 0.43 | 3.48 | |
| 平均值 Average | 6.45 | 5.15 | 0.33 | 2.57 | 0.40 | 2.98 | |
| B | 叶 Leaf | 13.16 | 4.66 | 0.63 | 3.12 | 0.54 | 4.42 |
| 枝 Branch | 1.73 | 1.60 | 0.16 | 1.97 | 0.14 | 1.12 | |
| 干 Stem | 1.15 | 1.02 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 0.61 | |
| 皮 Bark | 4.01 | 1.33 | 0.20 | 5.83 | 0.25 | 2.32 | |
| 平均值 Average | 2.83 | 1.55 | 0.18 | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1.30 |
表4 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林各器官的养分富集系数
Table 4 Accumulation coefficients of nutrient in different organs of Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions
| 立地 Site | 器官 Organ | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 平均值 Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 叶 Leaf | 27.95 | 12.99 | 1.02 | 4.18 | 1.06 | 9.44 |
| 枝 Branch | 4.29 | 6.07 | 0.36 | 2.89 | 0.33 | 2.79 | |
| 干 Stem | 2.56 | 3.97 | 0.21 | 1.34 | 0.29 | 1.67 | |
| 皮 Bark | 8.21 | 2.78 | 0.28 | 5.69 | 0.43 | 3.48 | |
| 平均值 Average | 6.45 | 5.15 | 0.33 | 2.57 | 0.40 | 2.98 | |
| B | 叶 Leaf | 13.16 | 4.66 | 0.63 | 3.12 | 0.54 | 4.42 |
| 枝 Branch | 1.73 | 1.60 | 0.16 | 1.97 | 0.14 | 1.12 | |
| 干 Stem | 1.15 | 1.02 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 0.61 | |
| 皮 Bark | 4.01 | 1.33 | 0.20 | 5.83 | 0.25 | 2.32 | |
| 平均值 Average | 2.83 | 1.55 | 0.18 | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1.30 |
| 树种 Tree species | 树龄 Tree age (a) | 所在地 Location | 养分量/生物量 Nutrient/Biomass (g·kg-1) | 数据来源 Data source | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total | ||||
| 麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.44 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 7.49 | 0.78 | 12.88 | 本文立地A Site A in this paper |
| 麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.24 | 0.25 | 1.62 | 6.10 | 0.73 | 10.94 | 本文立地B Site B in this paper |
| 马占相思2 | 11 | 广西南宁 Nanning, Guangxi | 5.56 | 0.09 | 1.01 | 3.12 | 0.24 | 10.03 | |
| 楠木3 | 37 | 福建顺昌Shunchang, Fujian | 3.55 | 0.23 | 3.24 | 2.63 | 0.62 | 10.27 | |
| 刺槐4 | 13 | 陕西淳化 Chunhua, Shaanxi | 11.71 | 0.50 | 1.91 | 12.16 | 1.91 | 28.19 | |
| 福建柏5 | 20 | 福建安溪 Anxi, Fujian | 2.20 | 0.28 | 2.28 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 6.06 | |
| 杉木6 | 15 | 福建尤溪 Youxi, Fujian | 2.68 | 0.36 | 2.16 | 2.52 | 0.55 | 8.27 | |
| 杉木6 | 11 | 广西宜山 Yishan, Guangxi | 2.80 | 0.23 | 1.43 | 3.31 | 0.51 | 8.28 | |
| 马尾松7 | 22 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 1.36 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 1.42 | 0.50 | 4.35 | |
| 马尾松7 | 23 | 广西武宣 Wuxuan, Guangxi | 2.04 | 0.13 | 2.04 | 1.59 | 0.27 | 6.08 | |
| 马尾松7 | 41 | 福建三明 Sanming, Fujian | 1.77 | 1.05 | 1.27 | 6.06 | 0.69 | 10.84 | |
| 油松8 | 26 | 陕西黄陵Huangling, Shaanxi | 3.22 | 0.38 | 2.47 | 2.56 | 0.46 | 9.09 | |
| 油松8 | 30 | 甘肃正宁Zhengning, Gansu | 3.44 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 2.79 | 0.49 | 9.75 | |
| 油松8 | 21 | 陕西志丹 Zhidan, Shaanxi | 4.48 | 0.51 | 3.68 | 2.88 | 0.64 | 12.19 | |
| 樟子松9 | 23 | 辽宁章古 Zhanggu, Liaoning | 2.58 | 0.29 | 1.08 | 3.65 | 1.60 | 9.19 | |
表5 不同树种的养分利用效率比较
Table 5 Comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency among different tree species
| 树种 Tree species | 树龄 Tree age (a) | 所在地 Location | 养分量/生物量 Nutrient/Biomass (g·kg-1) | 数据来源 Data source | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total | ||||
| 麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.44 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 7.49 | 0.78 | 12.88 | 本文立地A Site A in this paper |
| 麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.24 | 0.25 | 1.62 | 6.10 | 0.73 | 10.94 | 本文立地B Site B in this paper |
| 马占相思2 | 11 | 广西南宁 Nanning, Guangxi | 5.56 | 0.09 | 1.01 | 3.12 | 0.24 | 10.03 | |
| 楠木3 | 37 | 福建顺昌Shunchang, Fujian | 3.55 | 0.23 | 3.24 | 2.63 | 0.62 | 10.27 | |
| 刺槐4 | 13 | 陕西淳化 Chunhua, Shaanxi | 11.71 | 0.50 | 1.91 | 12.16 | 1.91 | 28.19 | |
| 福建柏5 | 20 | 福建安溪 Anxi, Fujian | 2.20 | 0.28 | 2.28 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 6.06 | |
| 杉木6 | 15 | 福建尤溪 Youxi, Fujian | 2.68 | 0.36 | 2.16 | 2.52 | 0.55 | 8.27 | |
| 杉木6 | 11 | 广西宜山 Yishan, Guangxi | 2.80 | 0.23 | 1.43 | 3.31 | 0.51 | 8.28 | |
| 马尾松7 | 22 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 1.36 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 1.42 | 0.50 | 4.35 | |
| 马尾松7 | 23 | 广西武宣 Wuxuan, Guangxi | 2.04 | 0.13 | 2.04 | 1.59 | 0.27 | 6.08 | |
| 马尾松7 | 41 | 福建三明 Sanming, Fujian | 1.77 | 1.05 | 1.27 | 6.06 | 0.69 | 10.84 | |
| 油松8 | 26 | 陕西黄陵Huangling, Shaanxi | 3.22 | 0.38 | 2.47 | 2.56 | 0.46 | 9.09 | |
| 油松8 | 30 | 甘肃正宁Zhengning, Gansu | 3.44 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 2.79 | 0.49 | 9.75 | |
| 油松8 | 21 | 陕西志丹 Zhidan, Shaanxi | 4.48 | 0.51 | 3.68 | 2.88 | 0.64 | 12.19 | |
| 樟子松9 | 23 | 辽宁章古 Zhanggu, Liaoning | 2.58 | 0.29 | 1.08 | 3.65 | 1.60 | 9.19 | |
| [1] | Afforestation Department, State Forestry Administration, China (国家林业局造林司) (2003). Ecological construction and control methods of forest in upper reaches of Yangtze River. Practical Forestry Technology (林业实用技术), (9), 32. (in Chinese) |
| [2] |
Alongi DM, Clough BF, Robertson AI (2005). Nutrient-use efficiency in arid-zone forests of the mangroves Rhizophora stylosa and Avicennia marina. Aquatic Botany, 82, 121-131.
DOI URL |
| [3] | Arboretum Editor Committee of China (中国树木志编委会) (1981). Planting Technology of Main Trees in China (中国主要树种造林技术). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [4] |
Birk EM, Vitousek PM (1986). Nitrogen availability and nitrogen use efficiency in loblolly pine stands. Ecology, 67, 69-79.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Bridgham SD, Pastor J, McClaugherty CA, Richardson CJ (1995). Nutrient-use efficiency: a litterfall index, a model, and a test along a nutrient availability gradient in North Carolina Peatlands. The American Naturalist, 145, 1-21.
DOI URL |
| [6] | Cai CY (柴承佑), Wang XY (王新洋), Ding BR (丁伯让) (2001). Research on economic benefits of Quercus acutissima for fuel in Jianghuai hills area. Quarterly of Forest By-product and Speciality in China (中国林副特产), (3), 56-57. (in Chinese) |
| [7] | Cao JH (曹建华), Li XB (李小波), Zhao CM (赵春梅), Jiang JS (蒋菊生), Xie GS (谢贵水) (2007). Advances on researches of nutrient cycling in forest ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture (热带农业科学), 27(6), 68-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [8] |
Chapin III FS (1980). The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 233-260.
DOI URL |
| [9] | Chapin III FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York. |
| [10] | Chen ZD (陈中东), Wu YX (吴耀先), Lu ZM (卢正茂), Wang ZY (王志运), Wei ZH (魏振华) (2004). Study on plantation standard of Quercus acutissima for fuelwood in short rotation. Practical Forestry Technology (林业实用技术), (11), 4-5. (in Chinese) |
| [11] |
Ducic T, Berthold D, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Beese F, Polle A (2009). Mycorrhizal communities in relation to biomass production and nutrient use efficiency in two varieties of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii and var. glauca) in different forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 742-753.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Enoki T, Kawaguchi H, Iwatsubo G (1997). Nutrient-uptake and nutrient-use efficiency of Pinus thunbergii Parl. along a topographical gradient of soil nutrient availability. Ecological Research, 12, 191-199.
DOI URL |
| [13] | Fang JY (方精云), Liu GH (刘国华), Xu SL (徐嵩龄) (1996). Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 16, 497-508. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | Gao JR (高甲荣), Xiao B (肖斌) (2001). Nutrient distribution and accumulation pattern of Chinese pine plantations in Qiaoshan forested region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 12, 667-671. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [15] | Gao JR (高甲荣), Zhang DS (张东升), Xiao B (肖斌), Niu JZ (牛健植) (2002). Nutrient distribution and accumulation pattern of Chinese pine plantation ecosystems in the loess region. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 24(1), 26-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [16] | Guan DS (管东生) (1995). Nutrient utilization efficiency of grassland, fernland and shrubland in Hong Kong. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 14(2), 23-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [17] |
Guo LB, Sims REH, Horne DJ (2002). Biomass production and nutrient cycling in Eucalyptus short rotation energy forests in New Zealand. I. Biomass and nutrient accumulation. Bioresource Technology, 85, 273-283.
DOI URL PMID |
| [18] | Guo SM (郭圣茂), Peng R (彭仁), Du TZ (杜天真), Qiu YX (邱业先), Lai XL (赖晓莲) (2006). Seasonal changes of β-carotene content in leaves of several varieties of Fagaceae family. Jiangxi Forestry Science and Technology (江西林业科技), (3), 1-2. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [19] | He B (何斌), Qin WM (秦武明), Yu HG (余浩光), Liu YH (刘运华), Qin L (覃林), Qin YH (覃永华) (2007). Biological cycling of nutrients in different ages classes of Acacia mangium plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 5158-5167. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [20] |
Heerwaarden VLM, Toet S, Aerts R (2003). Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency and proficiency in six sub-arctic bog species after 4 years of nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Ecology, 91, 1060-1070.
DOI URL |
| [21] | Jiao SR (焦树仁) (1985). A preliminary study of the biomass and nutrient elements distribution in cultivated Mongolian pine forests in the Zhanggutai region, Liaoning Province. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学丛刊), 9, 257-265. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [22] |
Killingbeck KT (1996). Nutrient in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology, 77, 1716-1727.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
Knops JMH, Koenig WD, Nash III TH (1997). On the relationship between nutrient use efficiency and fertility in forest ecosystems. Oecologia, 110, 550-556.
DOI URL PMID |
| [24] | Liu WF (刘文飞), Fan HB (樊后保), Xie YS (谢友森), Ruan XH (阮宣华) (2008). Nutrient accumulation and distribution in a Masson pine stand in northwestern Fujian. Ecology and Environment (生态环境), 17, 708-712. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [25] | Liu ZW (刘增文), Li YS (李雅素) (2003). A study on the efficiency of nutrient utilization in black locust plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23, 444-449. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [26] | Lu ZM (卢正茂), Wu YX (吴耀先), Yu YB (于远斌), Yang YL (杨玉林), Lu DB (卢德宝), Hou K (侯坤) (2003). Study on growth of Quercus acutissima under different regeneration methods. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology (吉林林业科技), 32(5), 18-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [27] | Ma XQ (马祥庆), Liu AQ (刘爱琴), Ma Z (马壮), Fan SH (范少辉) (2000). A comparative study on nutrient accumulation and distribution of different generations of Chinese fir plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 11, 501-506. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [28] | Peng LF (彭龙福) (2008). Study on nutrient elements of Phoebe bournei plantation in the different site conditions. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology (福建林业科技), 35(2), 10-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [29] |
Peri PL, Gargaglione V, Pastur GM (2008). Above- and belowground nutrients storage and biomass accumulation in marginal Nothofagus antarctica forests in Southern Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 2502-2511.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
Safou-Matondo R, Deleporte P, Laclau JP, Bouillet JP (2005). Hybrid and clonal variability of nutrient content and nutrient use efficiency in Eucalyptus stands in Congo. Forest Ecology and Management, 210, 193-204.
DOI URL |
| [31] | Shen JB (申建波), Zhang FS (张福锁), Mao DR (毛达如) (1997). The ecological significance of mineral nutrition in plants. I. The uptake, utilization and allocation of mineral nutrients by plants. Eco-Agriculture Research (生态农业研究), 5(2), 11-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [32] | Shen SM (沈善敏), Yu WT (宇万太), Zhang L (张璐), Lian HZ (廉鸿志) (1992). Internal and external nutrient cyclings of poplar tree. I. Changes of nutrient storage in different parts of poplar tree before and after leaf fallen. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 3, 296-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [33] | Shen SM (沈善敏), Yu WT (宇万太), Zhang L (张璐), Lian HZ (廉鸿志) (1993). Internal and external nutrient cyclings of poplar tree. II. Transferring and cycling of nutrients in and out of the tree before and after leaf fallen. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 4, 27-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [34] | Su B (苏波), Han XG (韩兴国), Huang JH (黄建辉), Qu CM (渠春梅) (2000). The nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of plants and it’s implications on the strategy of plant adaptation to nutrient stressed environments. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 20, 335-343. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [35] | Tang LZ (唐罗忠), Yu MK (虞木奎), Yan CF (严春风), Liu ZL (刘志龙), Fang SZ (方升佐) (2008). Effects of site condition and cultivation on growth of sawtooth oak plantations. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry (福建林学院学报), 28(2), 130-135. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [36] |
Turner J, Lambert MJ (2008). Nutrient cycling in age sequences of two Eucalyptus plantation species. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1701-1712.
DOI URL |
| [37] |
Uri V, Vares A, Tullus H, Kanal A (2007). Above-ground biomass production and nutrient accumulation in young stands of silver birch on abandoned agricultural land. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 195-204.
DOI URL |
| [38] |
Vitousek PM (1982). Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. The American Naturalist, 119, 553-572.
DOI URL |
| [39] | Wu PF (吴鹏飞), Ma XQ (马祥庆) (2009). Research advances in the mechanism of high nutrient use efficiency in plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 427-437. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [40] | Xiang WH (项文化), Tian DL (田大伦) (2002). Nutrient cycling in Pinus massoniana stands of different age classes. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 26, 89-95. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [41] | Xiao XX (肖祥希), Yang ZW (杨宗武), Zhang XW (张学武), Chen LS (陈林生), Zhuo KF (卓开发), Tan FL (谭芳林) (2002). The study on the accumulation and distribution of nutrient in Fokienia hodginsii plantation. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 15(1), 83-87. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [42] | Xing XR (邢雪荣), Han XG (韩兴国), Chen LZ (陈灵芝) (2000). A review on research of plant nutrient use efficiency. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 11, 785-790. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [43] | Xue L (薛立), Luo S (罗山) (2002). Concentration and distribution of nutrient in an artificial Cunninghamia lanceolata stand ecosystem at Yishan. Journal of South China Agricultural University (华南农业大学学报), 23, 24-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [44] | Xue L (薛立), Luo S (罗山) (2003). Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus and their re-translocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous broadleaved trees. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 16(2), 166-170. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [45] | Yan CR (严昌荣), Chen LZ (陈灵芝), Huang JH (黄建辉), Han XG (韩兴国) (1999). A study on nutrient cycling of pine stands in eastern part of China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23, 351-360. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [46] | Yang C (杨澄), Dang KL (党坤良), Liu JJ (刘建军) (1997). Water-source conservation and regulating efficacy of artificial forest of Quercus acutissima. Journal of Northwest Forestry College (西北林学院学报), 12(2), 15-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [47] | Yang XJ (杨学军), Jiang ZL (姜志林) (2001). Water holding function of under forest layer of main forest types in hilly area of southern Jiangsu Province. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持通报), 21(3), 28-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [48] | Yu CQ (于成琦), Liu H (刘辉), Huo YH (霍玉华), Wang XL (王晓琳), Jin DS (金大帅), Sun T (孙涛), Wu YX (吴耀先), Song DL (宋德利) (2005). Study on directive cultivation of Quercus acutissima timber-forest for edible fungus. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology (吉林林业科技), 34(5), 36-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [49] | Zhang XB (张希彪), Shangguan ZP (上官周平) (2006). Nutrient distributions and bio-cycle patterns in both natural and artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forests in Hilly Loess Regions. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 26, 373-382. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [50] | Zhang XD (张旭东), Xue MH (薛明华), Xu J (许军) (1993). Study on distribution pattern of nutrient elements in masson pine plantation of Anhui Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 4, 7-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [51] | Zhang XJ (张晓娟), Wei TX (魏天兴), Jing LB (荆丽波), Yin N (尹娜), Liu YH (刘艳辉) (2008). Nutrient distribution and accumulation patterns of natural secondary forests on the Loess Plateau of Shanxi Province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 30(3), 57-62. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [52] | Zhu LK (祝列克) (2006). Situation, objective and countermeasure of bio-energy forest in China. Green China (绿色中国), (24), 10-16. (in Chinese) |
| [53] | Zou DM (邹达明), Zhu GQ (朱光权), Wu SY (吴士元), Wu YF (吴永峰), Hu HJ (胡华杰), Ye CW (叶长文) (1997). Preliminary study on the trees selection for cultivating mushroom. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology (浙江林业科技), 17(1), 18-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 王蓉钧, 吴福忠, 吴秋霞, 朱晶晶, 倪祥银. 不同生活型植物叶片氮重吸收效率的差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 344-351. |
| [2] | 张静, 陈洁, 李艳朋, 盘李军, 许涵, 李意德, 何海生. 南亚热带针阔混交人工林植物生物量比较及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [3] | 徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [4] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [5] | 邢强, 赵斌, 胡永红, 杨君, 秦俊, 刘何铭, 王红兵, 周鹏. 华东地区两种典型立体绿化植物根系性状特征及对新型土壤基质的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1498-1514. |
| [6] | 宋珊珊, 唐志尧. 河北塞罕坝草甸草原根际土壤真菌与植物地上生物量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1461-1471. |
| [7] | 朱瑞德, 杨俊薇, 刘宵含, 陈冰瑞, 池秀莲, 田地, 杨光, 程蒙, 戴亚峰, 王诗文. 霍山石斛设施和林下栽培模式中养分对植物-微生物关联的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1434-1447. |
| [8] | 樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [9] | 马腾飞, 郝杰, 刁华杰, 宁亚楠, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 董宽虎. 晋北农牧交错带草地土壤无机氮含量的季节变化及其对放牧强度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 965-974. |
| [10] | 刘新月, 王立平, 刘春和, 孙艳丽, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山, 钱多. 北京不同林龄人工林生物量空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 939-951. |
| [11] | 陈文义, 王智勇, 周梦岩, 麻文俊, 王军辉, 罗志斌, 周婧. 幼龄楸树生物量分配规律与异速生长模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 356-366. |
| [12] | 郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158. |
| [13] | 王袼, 胡姝娅, 李阳, 陈晓鹏, 李红玉, 董宽虎, 何念鹏, 王常慧. 不同类型草原土壤净氮矿化速率的温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 523-533. |
| [14] | 梁逸娴, 王传宽, 臧妙涵, 上官虹玉, 刘逸潇, 全先奎. 落叶松径向生长和生物量分配对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 459-468. |
| [15] | 黄玲, 王榛, 马泽, 杨发林, 李岚, SEREKPAYEV Nurlan, NOGAYEV Adilbek, 侯扶江. 长期放牧和氮添加对黄土高原典型草原长芒草种群生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 317-330. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19