植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 661-670.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.005
唐罗忠1,*(), 刘志龙1, 虞木奎2, 方升佐1, 赵丹1, 王子寅1
收稿日期:
2009-03-02
接受日期:
2010-03-05
出版日期:
2010-03-02
发布日期:
2010-06-01
通讯作者:
唐罗忠
作者简介:
* E-mail: tangluozhong@yahoo.com.cn
TANG Luo-Zhong1,*(), LIU Zhi-Long1, YU Mu-Kui2, FANG Sheng-Zuo1, ZHAO Dan1, WANG Zi-Yin1
Received:
2009-03-02
Accepted:
2010-03-05
Online:
2010-03-02
Published:
2010-06-01
Contact:
TANG Luo-Zhong
摘要:
麻栎(Quercus acutissima)是一种分布广、用途大、耐干旱瘠薄的乔木树种, 掌握其生长规律和养分利用特性对麻栎人工林的科学经营十分必要。对安徽省滁州市红琊山林场两种立地条件下的麻栎人工林的生长和养分状况进行了对比研究, 结果表明: 在土壤含石量较高、养分含量较少的立地条件下, 12年生的麻栎人工林地上部分生物量为49 180.2 kg·hm-2; 林木养分总累积量为633.9 kg·hm-2, 其中N、P、K、Ca、Mg的累积量分别为119.9、18.7、88.5、368.6和38.2 kg·hm-2。在土壤含石量较少、养分含量较高的立地条件下, 12年生麻栎人工林地上部分生物量为90 774.8 kg·hm-2; 林木养分总累积量为993.6 kg·hm-2, 其中N、P、K、Ca、Mg的累积量分别为203.5、23.0、146.9、553.6和66.6 kg·hm-2。所以, 立地条件对麻栎生长和养分累积具有显著影响。较差立地条件下的麻栎对土壤养分的富集系数较大, 但其凋落物的养分含量较低。研究显示, 麻栎可以通过养分奢侈吸收、提高养分内循环、减少养分损失等途径来适应低养分环境。
唐罗忠, 刘志龙, 虞木奎, 方升佐, 赵丹, 王子寅. 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林地上部分养分的积累和分配. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 661-670. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.005
TANG Luo-Zhong, LIU Zhi-Long, YU Mu-Kui, FANG Sheng-Zuo, ZHAO Dan, WANG Zi-Yin. Nutrient accumulation and allocation of aboveground parts in Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions in Anhui, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6): 661-670. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.005
立地 Site | 密度 Density (tree·hm-2) | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 树高 Tree height (m) | 林分生物量 Stand biomass (kg·hm-2) | 生产力 Productivity (kg·hm-2·a-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶 Leaf | 枝 Branch | 干 Stem | 皮 Bark | 总计 Total | |||||
A | 4 619 ± 341a | 6.2 ± 0.3a | 6.9 ± 0.2a | 5 300.3 ± 314.6a | 8 899.1 ± 687.7a | 27 682.2 ± 1 407.5a | 7 298.6 ± 436.8a | 49 180.2 ± 3 677.6a | 4 098.4 ± 306.5a |
B | 2 567 ± 231b | 9.1 ± 0.5b | 10.3 ± 0.4b | 9 296.4 ± 477.8b | 19 902.6 ± 1 423.5b | 51 378.0 ± 2 721.2b | 10 197.8 ± 779.5b | 90 774.8 ± 5 264.7b | 7 564.6 ± 438.7b |
表1 两种立地条件下12年生麻栎人工林生长量(平均值±标准偏差, n = 3)
Table 1 Growth of 12-year-old Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions (means ± SD, n = 3)
立地 Site | 密度 Density (tree·hm-2) | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 树高 Tree height (m) | 林分生物量 Stand biomass (kg·hm-2) | 生产力 Productivity (kg·hm-2·a-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶 Leaf | 枝 Branch | 干 Stem | 皮 Bark | 总计 Total | |||||
A | 4 619 ± 341a | 6.2 ± 0.3a | 6.9 ± 0.2a | 5 300.3 ± 314.6a | 8 899.1 ± 687.7a | 27 682.2 ± 1 407.5a | 7 298.6 ± 436.8a | 49 180.2 ± 3 677.6a | 4 098.4 ± 306.5a |
B | 2 567 ± 231b | 9.1 ± 0.5b | 10.3 ± 0.4b | 9 296.4 ± 477.8b | 19 902.6 ± 1 423.5b | 51 378.0 ± 2 721.2b | 10 197.8 ± 779.5b | 90 774.8 ± 5 264.7b | 7 564.6 ± 438.7b |
组分 Component | 立地 Site | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(g·kg-1) | |||||||
叶 | A | 10.57 ± 1.01a | 0.96 ± 0.04a | 5.49 ± 0.52a | 12.19 ± 1.16a | 2.06 ± 0.31a | 31.27 |
Leaf | B | 10.44 ± 1.50a | 0.76 ± 0.08b | 5.58 ± 0.67a | 10.67 ± 0.61a | 2.35 ± 0.28a | 29.80 |
A/B | 1.01 | 1.27 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 1.05 | |
枝 | A | 1.62 ± 0.23a | 0.45 ± 0.08a | 1.94 ± 0.24a | 8.42 ± 0.53a | 0.64 ± 0.09a | 13.07 |
Branch | B | 1.37 ± 0.08a | 0.26 ± 0.05b | 1.41 ± 0.02b | 6.74 ± 0.83b | 0.61 ± 0.08a | 10.39 |
A/B | 1.19 | 1.73 | 1.38 | 1.25 | 1.04 | 1.26 | |
干 | A | 0.97 ± 0.08a | 0.29 ± 0.06a | 1.12 ± 0.06a | 3.91 ± 0.65a | 0.56 ± 0.05a | 6.84 |
Stem | B | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.17 ± 0.04b | 0.96 ± 0.07b | 2.27 ± 0.18b | 0.42 ± 0.06b | 4.72 |
A/B | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.17 | 1.72 | 1.34 | 1.45 | |
皮 | A | 3.10 ± 0.20a | 0.21 ± 0.03a | 1.52 ± 0.09a | 16.57 ± 1.26a | 0.84 ± 0.16a | 22.24 |
Bark | B | 3.18 ± 0.58a | 0.22 ± 0.03a | 1.75 ± 0.22a | 19.95 ± 1.78a | 1.10 ± 0.13a | 26.19 |
A/B | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.85 | |
凋落物 | A | 7.26 ± 1.30a | 0.51 ± 0.05a | 1.23 ± 0.14a | 18.61 ± 2.10a | 1.34 ± 0.14a | 28.94 |
Litter | B | 7.71 ± 0.63a | 0.60 ± 0.09a | 1.71 ± 0.21b | 23.99 ± 3.12a | 1.53 ± 0.05a | 35.53 |
A/B | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.81 | |
土壤 | A | 0.38 ± 0.06a | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 5.38 ± 0.39a | 2.91 ± 0.45a | 1.95 ± 0.16a | 10.69 |
Soil | B | 0.79 ± 0.13b | 0.16 ± 0.03b | 8.86 ± 0.57b | 3.42 ± 0.55a | 4.36 ± 0.31b | 17.60 |
A/B | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.45 | 0.61 |
表2 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林各组分养分含量(平均值±标准偏差, n = 3)
Table 2 Nutrient concentrations in different components of Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions (means ± SD, n = 3)
组分 Component | 立地 Site | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(g·kg-1) | |||||||
叶 | A | 10.57 ± 1.01a | 0.96 ± 0.04a | 5.49 ± 0.52a | 12.19 ± 1.16a | 2.06 ± 0.31a | 31.27 |
Leaf | B | 10.44 ± 1.50a | 0.76 ± 0.08b | 5.58 ± 0.67a | 10.67 ± 0.61a | 2.35 ± 0.28a | 29.80 |
A/B | 1.01 | 1.27 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 1.05 | |
枝 | A | 1.62 ± 0.23a | 0.45 ± 0.08a | 1.94 ± 0.24a | 8.42 ± 0.53a | 0.64 ± 0.09a | 13.07 |
Branch | B | 1.37 ± 0.08a | 0.26 ± 0.05b | 1.41 ± 0.02b | 6.74 ± 0.83b | 0.61 ± 0.08a | 10.39 |
A/B | 1.19 | 1.73 | 1.38 | 1.25 | 1.04 | 1.26 | |
干 | A | 0.97 ± 0.08a | 0.29 ± 0.06a | 1.12 ± 0.06a | 3.91 ± 0.65a | 0.56 ± 0.05a | 6.84 |
Stem | B | 0.91 ± 0.15a | 0.17 ± 0.04b | 0.96 ± 0.07b | 2.27 ± 0.18b | 0.42 ± 0.06b | 4.72 |
A/B | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.17 | 1.72 | 1.34 | 1.45 | |
皮 | A | 3.10 ± 0.20a | 0.21 ± 0.03a | 1.52 ± 0.09a | 16.57 ± 1.26a | 0.84 ± 0.16a | 22.24 |
Bark | B | 3.18 ± 0.58a | 0.22 ± 0.03a | 1.75 ± 0.22a | 19.95 ± 1.78a | 1.10 ± 0.13a | 26.19 |
A/B | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.85 | |
凋落物 | A | 7.26 ± 1.30a | 0.51 ± 0.05a | 1.23 ± 0.14a | 18.61 ± 2.10a | 1.34 ± 0.14a | 28.94 |
Litter | B | 7.71 ± 0.63a | 0.60 ± 0.09a | 1.71 ± 0.21b | 23.99 ± 3.12a | 1.53 ± 0.05a | 35.53 |
A/B | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.81 | |
土壤 | A | 0.38 ± 0.06a | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 5.38 ± 0.39a | 2.91 ± 0.45a | 1.95 ± 0.16a | 10.69 |
Soil | B | 0.79 ± 0.13b | 0.16 ± 0.03b | 8.86 ± 0.57b | 3.42 ± 0.55a | 4.36 ± 0.31b | 17.60 |
A/B | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.45 | 0.61 |
立地 Site | 组分 Component | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(kg·hm-2) | |||||||
A | 叶 Leaf | 56.0 | 5.1 | 29.1 | 64.6 | 10.9 | 165.7 |
枝 Branch | 14.4 | 4.0 | 17.3 | 74.9 | 5.7 | 116.3 | |
干 Stem | 26.8 | 8.1 | 31.0 | 108.2 | 15.4 | 189.5 | |
皮 Bark | 22.7 | 1.5 | 11.1 | 120.9 | 6.1 | 162.3 | |
小计 Sum | 119.9 | 18.7 | 88.5 | 368.6 | 38.2 | 633.9 | |
凋落物 Litter | 46.5 | 3.3 | 7.8 | 119.1 | 8.6 | 185.2 | |
土壤 Soil | 724.3 | 141.8 | 10 304.8 | 5 583.5 | 3 732.6 | 20 487.0 | |
总计 Total | 890.7 | 163.8 | 10 401.1 | 6 071.2 | 3 779.4 | 21 306.1 | |
B | 叶 Leaf | 97.0 | 7.1 | 51.9 | 99.3 | 21.8 | 277.1 |
枝 Branch | 27.2 | 5.2 | 28.0 | 134.2 | 12.2 | 206.7 | |
干 Stem | 46.8 | 8.5 | 49.1 | 116.7 | 21.4 | 242.6 | |
皮 Bark | 32.4 | 2.2 | 17.8 | 203.5 | 11.2 | 267.2 | |
小计 Sum | 203.5 | 23.0 | 146.9 | 553.6 | 66.6 | 993.6 | |
凋落物 Litter | 70.9 | 5.5 | 15.7 | 220.7 | 14.1 | 326.9 | |
土壤 Soil | 2 396.8 | 492.7 | 26 782.4 | 10 343.0 | 13 166.0 | 53 180.9 | |
总计 Total | 2 671.2 | 521.2 | 26 945.0 | 11 117.3 | 13 246.7 | 54 501.4 |
表3 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林养分积累量与分配
Table 3 Accumulation and allocation of nutrient in different components of Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions
立地 Site | 组分 Component | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(kg·hm-2) | |||||||
A | 叶 Leaf | 56.0 | 5.1 | 29.1 | 64.6 | 10.9 | 165.7 |
枝 Branch | 14.4 | 4.0 | 17.3 | 74.9 | 5.7 | 116.3 | |
干 Stem | 26.8 | 8.1 | 31.0 | 108.2 | 15.4 | 189.5 | |
皮 Bark | 22.7 | 1.5 | 11.1 | 120.9 | 6.1 | 162.3 | |
小计 Sum | 119.9 | 18.7 | 88.5 | 368.6 | 38.2 | 633.9 | |
凋落物 Litter | 46.5 | 3.3 | 7.8 | 119.1 | 8.6 | 185.2 | |
土壤 Soil | 724.3 | 141.8 | 10 304.8 | 5 583.5 | 3 732.6 | 20 487.0 | |
总计 Total | 890.7 | 163.8 | 10 401.1 | 6 071.2 | 3 779.4 | 21 306.1 | |
B | 叶 Leaf | 97.0 | 7.1 | 51.9 | 99.3 | 21.8 | 277.1 |
枝 Branch | 27.2 | 5.2 | 28.0 | 134.2 | 12.2 | 206.7 | |
干 Stem | 46.8 | 8.5 | 49.1 | 116.7 | 21.4 | 242.6 | |
皮 Bark | 32.4 | 2.2 | 17.8 | 203.5 | 11.2 | 267.2 | |
小计 Sum | 203.5 | 23.0 | 146.9 | 553.6 | 66.6 | 993.6 | |
凋落物 Litter | 70.9 | 5.5 | 15.7 | 220.7 | 14.1 | 326.9 | |
土壤 Soil | 2 396.8 | 492.7 | 26 782.4 | 10 343.0 | 13 166.0 | 53 180.9 | |
总计 Total | 2 671.2 | 521.2 | 26 945.0 | 11 117.3 | 13 246.7 | 54 501.4 |
立地 Site | 器官 Organ | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 平均值 Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 叶 Leaf | 27.95 | 12.99 | 1.02 | 4.18 | 1.06 | 9.44 |
枝 Branch | 4.29 | 6.07 | 0.36 | 2.89 | 0.33 | 2.79 | |
干 Stem | 2.56 | 3.97 | 0.21 | 1.34 | 0.29 | 1.67 | |
皮 Bark | 8.21 | 2.78 | 0.28 | 5.69 | 0.43 | 3.48 | |
平均值 Average | 6.45 | 5.15 | 0.33 | 2.57 | 0.40 | 2.98 | |
B | 叶 Leaf | 13.16 | 4.66 | 0.63 | 3.12 | 0.54 | 4.42 |
枝 Branch | 1.73 | 1.60 | 0.16 | 1.97 | 0.14 | 1.12 | |
干 Stem | 1.15 | 1.02 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 0.61 | |
皮 Bark | 4.01 | 1.33 | 0.20 | 5.83 | 0.25 | 2.32 | |
平均值 Average | 2.83 | 1.55 | 0.18 | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1.30 |
表4 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林各器官的养分富集系数
Table 4 Accumulation coefficients of nutrient in different organs of Quercus acutissima plantations under two site conditions
立地 Site | 器官 Organ | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 平均值 Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 叶 Leaf | 27.95 | 12.99 | 1.02 | 4.18 | 1.06 | 9.44 |
枝 Branch | 4.29 | 6.07 | 0.36 | 2.89 | 0.33 | 2.79 | |
干 Stem | 2.56 | 3.97 | 0.21 | 1.34 | 0.29 | 1.67 | |
皮 Bark | 8.21 | 2.78 | 0.28 | 5.69 | 0.43 | 3.48 | |
平均值 Average | 6.45 | 5.15 | 0.33 | 2.57 | 0.40 | 2.98 | |
B | 叶 Leaf | 13.16 | 4.66 | 0.63 | 3.12 | 0.54 | 4.42 |
枝 Branch | 1.73 | 1.60 | 0.16 | 1.97 | 0.14 | 1.12 | |
干 Stem | 1.15 | 1.02 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 0.61 | |
皮 Bark | 4.01 | 1.33 | 0.20 | 5.83 | 0.25 | 2.32 | |
平均值 Average | 2.83 | 1.55 | 0.18 | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1.30 |
树种 Tree species | 树龄 Tree age (a) | 所在地 Location | 养分量/生物量 Nutrient/Biomass (g·kg-1) | 数据来源 Data source | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total | ||||
麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.44 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 7.49 | 0.78 | 12.88 | 本文立地A Site A in this paper |
麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.24 | 0.25 | 1.62 | 6.10 | 0.73 | 10.94 | 本文立地B Site B in this paper |
马占相思2 | 11 | 广西南宁 Nanning, Guangxi | 5.56 | 0.09 | 1.01 | 3.12 | 0.24 | 10.03 | |
楠木3 | 37 | 福建顺昌Shunchang, Fujian | 3.55 | 0.23 | 3.24 | 2.63 | 0.62 | 10.27 | |
刺槐4 | 13 | 陕西淳化 Chunhua, Shaanxi | 11.71 | 0.50 | 1.91 | 12.16 | 1.91 | 28.19 | |
福建柏5 | 20 | 福建安溪 Anxi, Fujian | 2.20 | 0.28 | 2.28 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 6.06 | |
杉木6 | 15 | 福建尤溪 Youxi, Fujian | 2.68 | 0.36 | 2.16 | 2.52 | 0.55 | 8.27 | |
杉木6 | 11 | 广西宜山 Yishan, Guangxi | 2.80 | 0.23 | 1.43 | 3.31 | 0.51 | 8.28 | |
马尾松7 | 22 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 1.36 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 1.42 | 0.50 | 4.35 | |
马尾松7 | 23 | 广西武宣 Wuxuan, Guangxi | 2.04 | 0.13 | 2.04 | 1.59 | 0.27 | 6.08 | |
马尾松7 | 41 | 福建三明 Sanming, Fujian | 1.77 | 1.05 | 1.27 | 6.06 | 0.69 | 10.84 | |
油松8 | 26 | 陕西黄陵Huangling, Shaanxi | 3.22 | 0.38 | 2.47 | 2.56 | 0.46 | 9.09 | |
油松8 | 30 | 甘肃正宁Zhengning, Gansu | 3.44 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 2.79 | 0.49 | 9.75 | |
油松8 | 21 | 陕西志丹 Zhidan, Shaanxi | 4.48 | 0.51 | 3.68 | 2.88 | 0.64 | 12.19 | |
樟子松9 | 23 | 辽宁章古 Zhanggu, Liaoning | 2.58 | 0.29 | 1.08 | 3.65 | 1.60 | 9.19 |
表5 不同树种的养分利用效率比较
Table 5 Comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency among different tree species
树种 Tree species | 树龄 Tree age (a) | 所在地 Location | 养分量/生物量 Nutrient/Biomass (g·kg-1) | 数据来源 Data source | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | Ca | Mg | 总计Total | ||||
麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.44 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 7.49 | 0.78 | 12.88 | 本文立地A Site A in this paper |
麻栎1 | 12 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 2.24 | 0.25 | 1.62 | 6.10 | 0.73 | 10.94 | 本文立地B Site B in this paper |
马占相思2 | 11 | 广西南宁 Nanning, Guangxi | 5.56 | 0.09 | 1.01 | 3.12 | 0.24 | 10.03 | |
楠木3 | 37 | 福建顺昌Shunchang, Fujian | 3.55 | 0.23 | 3.24 | 2.63 | 0.62 | 10.27 | |
刺槐4 | 13 | 陕西淳化 Chunhua, Shaanxi | 11.71 | 0.50 | 1.91 | 12.16 | 1.91 | 28.19 | |
福建柏5 | 20 | 福建安溪 Anxi, Fujian | 2.20 | 0.28 | 2.28 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 6.06 | |
杉木6 | 15 | 福建尤溪 Youxi, Fujian | 2.68 | 0.36 | 2.16 | 2.52 | 0.55 | 8.27 | |
杉木6 | 11 | 广西宜山 Yishan, Guangxi | 2.80 | 0.23 | 1.43 | 3.31 | 0.51 | 8.28 | |
马尾松7 | 22 | 安徽滁州 Chuzhou, Anhui | 1.36 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 1.42 | 0.50 | 4.35 | |
马尾松7 | 23 | 广西武宣 Wuxuan, Guangxi | 2.04 | 0.13 | 2.04 | 1.59 | 0.27 | 6.08 | |
马尾松7 | 41 | 福建三明 Sanming, Fujian | 1.77 | 1.05 | 1.27 | 6.06 | 0.69 | 10.84 | |
油松8 | 26 | 陕西黄陵Huangling, Shaanxi | 3.22 | 0.38 | 2.47 | 2.56 | 0.46 | 9.09 | |
油松8 | 30 | 甘肃正宁Zhengning, Gansu | 3.44 | 0.43 | 2.60 | 2.79 | 0.49 | 9.75 | |
油松8 | 21 | 陕西志丹 Zhidan, Shaanxi | 4.48 | 0.51 | 3.68 | 2.88 | 0.64 | 12.19 | |
樟子松9 | 23 | 辽宁章古 Zhanggu, Liaoning | 2.58 | 0.29 | 1.08 | 3.65 | 1.60 | 9.19 |
[1] | Afforestation Department, State Forestry Administration, China (国家林业局造林司) (2003). Ecological construction and control methods of forest in upper reaches of Yangtze River. Practical Forestry Technology (林业实用技术), (9), 32. (in Chinese) |
[2] |
Alongi DM, Clough BF, Robertson AI (2005). Nutrient-use efficiency in arid-zone forests of the mangroves Rhizophora stylosa and Avicennia marina. Aquatic Botany, 82, 121-131.
DOI URL |
[3] | Arboretum Editor Committee of China (中国树木志编委会) (1981). Planting Technology of Main Trees in China (中国主要树种造林技术). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[4] |
Birk EM, Vitousek PM (1986). Nitrogen availability and nitrogen use efficiency in loblolly pine stands. Ecology, 67, 69-79.
DOI URL |
[5] |
Bridgham SD, Pastor J, McClaugherty CA, Richardson CJ (1995). Nutrient-use efficiency: a litterfall index, a model, and a test along a nutrient availability gradient in North Carolina Peatlands. The American Naturalist, 145, 1-21.
DOI URL |
[6] | Cai CY (柴承佑), Wang XY (王新洋), Ding BR (丁伯让) (2001). Research on economic benefits of Quercus acutissima for fuel in Jianghuai hills area. Quarterly of Forest By-product and Speciality in China (中国林副特产), (3), 56-57. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Cao JH (曹建华), Li XB (李小波), Zhao CM (赵春梅), Jiang JS (蒋菊生), Xie GS (谢贵水) (2007). Advances on researches of nutrient cycling in forest ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture (热带农业科学), 27(6), 68-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] |
Chapin III FS (1980). The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 233-260.
DOI URL |
[9] | Chapin III FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York. |
[10] | Chen ZD (陈中东), Wu YX (吴耀先), Lu ZM (卢正茂), Wang ZY (王志运), Wei ZH (魏振华) (2004). Study on plantation standard of Quercus acutissima for fuelwood in short rotation. Practical Forestry Technology (林业实用技术), (11), 4-5. (in Chinese) |
[11] |
Ducic T, Berthold D, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Beese F, Polle A (2009). Mycorrhizal communities in relation to biomass production and nutrient use efficiency in two varieties of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii and var. glauca) in different forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 742-753.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Enoki T, Kawaguchi H, Iwatsubo G (1997). Nutrient-uptake and nutrient-use efficiency of Pinus thunbergii Parl. along a topographical gradient of soil nutrient availability. Ecological Research, 12, 191-199.
DOI URL |
[13] | Fang JY (方精云), Liu GH (刘国华), Xu SL (徐嵩龄) (1996). Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 16, 497-508. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Gao JR (高甲荣), Xiao B (肖斌) (2001). Nutrient distribution and accumulation pattern of Chinese pine plantations in Qiaoshan forested region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 12, 667-671. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Gao JR (高甲荣), Zhang DS (张东升), Xiao B (肖斌), Niu JZ (牛健植) (2002). Nutrient distribution and accumulation pattern of Chinese pine plantation ecosystems in the loess region. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 24(1), 26-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Guan DS (管东生) (1995). Nutrient utilization efficiency of grassland, fernland and shrubland in Hong Kong. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 14(2), 23-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] |
Guo LB, Sims REH, Horne DJ (2002). Biomass production and nutrient cycling in Eucalyptus short rotation energy forests in New Zealand. I. Biomass and nutrient accumulation. Bioresource Technology, 85, 273-283.
DOI URL PMID |
[18] | Guo SM (郭圣茂), Peng R (彭仁), Du TZ (杜天真), Qiu YX (邱业先), Lai XL (赖晓莲) (2006). Seasonal changes of β-carotene content in leaves of several varieties of Fagaceae family. Jiangxi Forestry Science and Technology (江西林业科技), (3), 1-2. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | He B (何斌), Qin WM (秦武明), Yu HG (余浩光), Liu YH (刘运华), Qin L (覃林), Qin YH (覃永华) (2007). Biological cycling of nutrients in different ages classes of Acacia mangium plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 5158-5167. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] |
Heerwaarden VLM, Toet S, Aerts R (2003). Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency and proficiency in six sub-arctic bog species after 4 years of nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Ecology, 91, 1060-1070.
DOI URL |
[21] | Jiao SR (焦树仁) (1985). A preliminary study of the biomass and nutrient elements distribution in cultivated Mongolian pine forests in the Zhanggutai region, Liaoning Province. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学丛刊), 9, 257-265. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] |
Killingbeck KT (1996). Nutrient in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology, 77, 1716-1727.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Knops JMH, Koenig WD, Nash III TH (1997). On the relationship between nutrient use efficiency and fertility in forest ecosystems. Oecologia, 110, 550-556.
DOI URL PMID |
[24] | Liu WF (刘文飞), Fan HB (樊后保), Xie YS (谢友森), Ruan XH (阮宣华) (2008). Nutrient accumulation and distribution in a Masson pine stand in northwestern Fujian. Ecology and Environment (生态环境), 17, 708-712. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Liu ZW (刘增文), Li YS (李雅素) (2003). A study on the efficiency of nutrient utilization in black locust plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23, 444-449. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Lu ZM (卢正茂), Wu YX (吴耀先), Yu YB (于远斌), Yang YL (杨玉林), Lu DB (卢德宝), Hou K (侯坤) (2003). Study on growth of Quercus acutissima under different regeneration methods. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology (吉林林业科技), 32(5), 18-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Ma XQ (马祥庆), Liu AQ (刘爱琴), Ma Z (马壮), Fan SH (范少辉) (2000). A comparative study on nutrient accumulation and distribution of different generations of Chinese fir plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 11, 501-506. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Peng LF (彭龙福) (2008). Study on nutrient elements of Phoebe bournei plantation in the different site conditions. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology (福建林业科技), 35(2), 10-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] |
Peri PL, Gargaglione V, Pastur GM (2008). Above- and belowground nutrients storage and biomass accumulation in marginal Nothofagus antarctica forests in Southern Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 2502-2511.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Safou-Matondo R, Deleporte P, Laclau JP, Bouillet JP (2005). Hybrid and clonal variability of nutrient content and nutrient use efficiency in Eucalyptus stands in Congo. Forest Ecology and Management, 210, 193-204.
DOI URL |
[31] | Shen JB (申建波), Zhang FS (张福锁), Mao DR (毛达如) (1997). The ecological significance of mineral nutrition in plants. I. The uptake, utilization and allocation of mineral nutrients by plants. Eco-Agriculture Research (生态农业研究), 5(2), 11-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] | Shen SM (沈善敏), Yu WT (宇万太), Zhang L (张璐), Lian HZ (廉鸿志) (1992). Internal and external nutrient cyclings of poplar tree. I. Changes of nutrient storage in different parts of poplar tree before and after leaf fallen. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 3, 296-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Shen SM (沈善敏), Yu WT (宇万太), Zhang L (张璐), Lian HZ (廉鸿志) (1993). Internal and external nutrient cyclings of poplar tree. II. Transferring and cycling of nutrients in and out of the tree before and after leaf fallen. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 4, 27-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[34] | Su B (苏波), Han XG (韩兴国), Huang JH (黄建辉), Qu CM (渠春梅) (2000). The nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of plants and it’s implications on the strategy of plant adaptation to nutrient stressed environments. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 20, 335-343. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[35] | Tang LZ (唐罗忠), Yu MK (虞木奎), Yan CF (严春风), Liu ZL (刘志龙), Fang SZ (方升佐) (2008). Effects of site condition and cultivation on growth of sawtooth oak plantations. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry (福建林学院学报), 28(2), 130-135. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] |
Turner J, Lambert MJ (2008). Nutrient cycling in age sequences of two Eucalyptus plantation species. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1701-1712.
DOI URL |
[37] |
Uri V, Vares A, Tullus H, Kanal A (2007). Above-ground biomass production and nutrient accumulation in young stands of silver birch on abandoned agricultural land. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 195-204.
DOI URL |
[38] |
Vitousek PM (1982). Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. The American Naturalist, 119, 553-572.
DOI URL |
[39] | Wu PF (吴鹏飞), Ma XQ (马祥庆) (2009). Research advances in the mechanism of high nutrient use efficiency in plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 427-437. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[40] | Xiang WH (项文化), Tian DL (田大伦) (2002). Nutrient cycling in Pinus massoniana stands of different age classes. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 26, 89-95. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[41] | Xiao XX (肖祥希), Yang ZW (杨宗武), Zhang XW (张学武), Chen LS (陈林生), Zhuo KF (卓开发), Tan FL (谭芳林) (2002). The study on the accumulation and distribution of nutrient in Fokienia hodginsii plantation. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 15(1), 83-87. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[42] | Xing XR (邢雪荣), Han XG (韩兴国), Chen LZ (陈灵芝) (2000). A review on research of plant nutrient use efficiency. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 11, 785-790. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[43] | Xue L (薛立), Luo S (罗山) (2002). Concentration and distribution of nutrient in an artificial Cunninghamia lanceolata stand ecosystem at Yishan. Journal of South China Agricultural University (华南农业大学学报), 23, 24-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[44] | Xue L (薛立), Luo S (罗山) (2003). Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus and their re-translocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous broadleaved trees. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 16(2), 166-170. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[45] | Yan CR (严昌荣), Chen LZ (陈灵芝), Huang JH (黄建辉), Han XG (韩兴国) (1999). A study on nutrient cycling of pine stands in eastern part of China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23, 351-360. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[46] | Yang C (杨澄), Dang KL (党坤良), Liu JJ (刘建军) (1997). Water-source conservation and regulating efficacy of artificial forest of Quercus acutissima. Journal of Northwest Forestry College (西北林学院学报), 12(2), 15-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[47] | Yang XJ (杨学军), Jiang ZL (姜志林) (2001). Water holding function of under forest layer of main forest types in hilly area of southern Jiangsu Province. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持通报), 21(3), 28-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[48] | Yu CQ (于成琦), Liu H (刘辉), Huo YH (霍玉华), Wang XL (王晓琳), Jin DS (金大帅), Sun T (孙涛), Wu YX (吴耀先), Song DL (宋德利) (2005). Study on directive cultivation of Quercus acutissima timber-forest for edible fungus. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology (吉林林业科技), 34(5), 36-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[49] | Zhang XB (张希彪), Shangguan ZP (上官周平) (2006). Nutrient distributions and bio-cycle patterns in both natural and artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forests in Hilly Loess Regions. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 26, 373-382. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[50] | Zhang XD (张旭东), Xue MH (薛明华), Xu J (许军) (1993). Study on distribution pattern of nutrient elements in masson pine plantation of Anhui Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 4, 7-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[51] | Zhang XJ (张晓娟), Wei TX (魏天兴), Jing LB (荆丽波), Yin N (尹娜), Liu YH (刘艳辉) (2008). Nutrient distribution and accumulation patterns of natural secondary forests on the Loess Plateau of Shanxi Province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 30(3), 57-62. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[52] | Zhu LK (祝列克) (2006). Situation, objective and countermeasure of bio-energy forest in China. Green China (绿色中国), (24), 10-16. (in Chinese) |
[53] | Zou DM (邹达明), Zhu GQ (朱光权), Wu SY (吴士元), Wu YF (吴永峰), Hu HJ (胡华杰), Ye CW (叶长文) (1997). Preliminary study on the trees selection for cultivating mushroom. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology (浙江林业科技), 17(1), 18-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王袼, 胡姝娅, 李阳, 陈晓鹏, 李红玉, 董宽虎, 何念鹏, 王常慧. 不同类型草原土壤净氮矿化速率的温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 523-533. |
[2] | 梁逸娴, 王传宽, 臧妙涵, 上官虹玉, 刘逸潇, 全先奎. 落叶松径向生长和生物量分配对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 459-468. |
[3] | 黄玲, 王榛, 马泽, 杨发林, 李岚, SEREKPAYEV Nurlan, NOGAYEV Adilbek, 侯扶江. 长期放牧和氮添加对黄土高原典型草原长芒草种群生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 317-330. |
[4] | 韩大勇, 李海燕, 张维, 杨允菲. 松嫩草地全叶马兰种群分株养分的季节运转及衰老过程[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 192-200. |
[5] | 耿雪琪, 唐亚坤, 王丽娜, 邓旭, 张泽凌, 周莹. 氮添加增加中国陆生植物生物量并降低其氮利用效率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 147-157. |
[6] | 李娜, 唐士明, 郭建英, 田茹, 王姗, 胡冰, 罗永红, 徐柱文. 放牧对内蒙古草地植物群落特征影响的meta分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1256-1269. |
[7] | 赵艳超, 陈立同. 土壤养分对青藏高原高寒草地生物量响应增温的调节作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1071-1081. |
[8] | 苏炜, 陈平, 吴婷, 刘岳, 宋雨婷, 刘旭军, 刘菊秀. 氮添加与干季延长对降香黄檀幼苗非结构性碳水化合物、养分与生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1094-1104. |
[9] | 张慧玲, 张耀艺, 彭清清, 杨静, 倪祥银, 吴福忠. 中亚热带同质园不同生活型树种微量元素重吸收效率的差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 978-987. |
[10] | 李冠军, 陈珑, 余雯静, 苏亲桂, 吴承祯, 苏军, 李键. 固体培养内生真菌对土壤盐胁迫下木麻黄幼苗渗透调节和抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 804-821. |
[11] | 罗娜娜, 盛茂银, 王霖娇, 石庆龙, 何宇. 长期植被恢复对中国西南喀斯特石漠化土壤活性有机碳组分含量和酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 867-881. |
[12] | 杜英东, 袁相洋, 冯兆忠. 不同形态氮对杨树光合特性及生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 348-360. |
[13] | 和璐璐, 张萱, 章毓文, 王晓霞, 刘亚栋, 刘岩, 范子莹, 何远洋, 席本野, 段劼. 辽东山区不同坡向长白落叶松人工林树冠特征与林木生长关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1523-1539. |
[14] | 刘艳杰, 刘玉龙, 王传宽, 王兴昌. 东北温带森林5个羽状复叶树种叶成本-效益关系比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1540-1550. |
[15] | 郝晴, 黄昌. 森林地上生物量遥感估算研究综述[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1356-1374. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19