Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 307-313.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0041
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
LONG Xiao_Hua, LIU Zhao_Pu*(), XU Wen_Jun
Accepted:
2005-04-05
Published:
2006-03-30
Contact:
LIU Zhao_Pu
LONG Xiao_Hua, LIU Zhao_Pu, XU Wen_Jun. EFFECTS OF SEAWATER TREATMENTS ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS SEEDLINGS AND RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS SUPPLY[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(2): 307-313.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0041
pH | 阴离子 Anion(g·L-1) | 阳离子 Cation(g·L-1) | 含盐量 Salinity(g·L-1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | HC | Cl- | S | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | K+ | Na+ | ||
8.30 | - | 0.132 | 17.52 | 3.867 | 0.785 | 1.027 | 0.596 | 9.480 | 33.33 |
Table 1 Basic ion contents of Laizhou bay seawater
pH | 阴离子 Anion(g·L-1) | 阳离子 Cation(g·L-1) | 含盐量 Salinity(g·L-1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | HC | Cl- | S | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | K+ | Na+ | ||
8.30 | - | 0.132 | 17.52 | 3.867 | 0.785 | 1.027 | 0.596 | 9.480 | 33.33 |
处理 Treatment | 天数 Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | ||
鲜重 Fresh weight (g·plant-1) | 4 | 3.48b | 3.30c | 3.56b | 3.54b | 3.84a | 3.67a | 3.36c | 3.65a | 3.48b | 3.73a |
8 | 4.26cd | 4.35cd | 4.58b | 4.68b | 4.67a | 4.85a | 4.18d | 4.23d | 4.32c | 4.46c | |
12 | 5.58a | 5.03ab | 5.59a | 4.96b | 5.68a | 5.12a | 4.59c | 4.37d | 4.73b | 4.62c | |
干重 Dry weight (g·plant-1) | 4 | 0.42b | 0.19c | 0.43ab | 0.20bc | 0.45a | 0.21ab | 0.38d | 0.21a | 0.39cd | 0.22a |
8 | 0.49b | 0.25b | 0.53a | 0.26b | 0.54a | 0.28a | 0.46c | 0.25b | 0.48bc | 0.27ab | |
12 | 0.59a | 0.33a | 0.58a | 0.32a | 0.59a | 0.33a | 0.53b | 0.30b | 0.55b | 0.32a |
Table 2 Effects of different treatment on biomass fresh weight and dry weight of shoot and root of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings
处理 Treatment | 天数 Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | ||
鲜重 Fresh weight (g·plant-1) | 4 | 3.48b | 3.30c | 3.56b | 3.54b | 3.84a | 3.67a | 3.36c | 3.65a | 3.48b | 3.73a |
8 | 4.26cd | 4.35cd | 4.58b | 4.68b | 4.67a | 4.85a | 4.18d | 4.23d | 4.32c | 4.46c | |
12 | 5.58a | 5.03ab | 5.59a | 4.96b | 5.68a | 5.12a | 4.59c | 4.37d | 4.73b | 4.62c | |
干重 Dry weight (g·plant-1) | 4 | 0.42b | 0.19c | 0.43ab | 0.20bc | 0.45a | 0.21ab | 0.38d | 0.21a | 0.39cd | 0.22a |
8 | 0.49b | 0.25b | 0.53a | 0.26b | 0.54a | 0.28a | 0.46c | 0.25b | 0.48bc | 0.27ab | |
12 | 0.59a | 0.33a | 0.58a | 0.32a | 0.59a | 0.33a | 0.53b | 0.30b | 0.55b | 0.32a |
处理Treatment | 天数Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
脯氨酸 Proline (μg·g-1 FW) | 4 | 17.12cd | 15.92d | 24.21b | 17.38c | 41.72a |
8 | 8.97e | 16.95d | 41.64c | 281.23b | 431.08a | |
12 | 5.20e | 14.37d | 23.73c | 118.91b | 233.68a | |
可溶性糖 Soluble_suger(%) | 4 | 0.55d | 0.74c | 0.89bc | 0.98b | 1.17a |
8 | 0.87e | 1.65d | 2.93b | 2.17c | 3.32a | |
12 | 0.90e | 1.01de | 1.16cd | 1.57b | 1.91a |
Table 3 Effects of different treatment on proline and soluble_suger content in leaf of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings
处理Treatment | 天数Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
脯氨酸 Proline (μg·g-1 FW) | 4 | 17.12cd | 15.92d | 24.21b | 17.38c | 41.72a |
8 | 8.97e | 16.95d | 41.64c | 281.23b | 431.08a | |
12 | 5.20e | 14.37d | 23.73c | 118.91b | 233.68a | |
可溶性糖 Soluble_suger(%) | 4 | 0.55d | 0.74c | 0.89bc | 0.98b | 1.17a |
8 | 0.87e | 1.65d | 2.93b | 2.17c | 3.32a | |
12 | 0.90e | 1.01de | 1.16cd | 1.57b | 1.91a |
处理Treatment | 天数Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOD (U·mg-1 protein) | 4 | 3.88b | 3.37d | 3.68c | 3.78bc | 4.26a |
8 | 3.98d | 3.62e | 4.15cd | 5.05b | 5.66a | |
12 | 4.28e | 4.99d | 5.73c | 6.11b | 7.94a | |
POD (mg-1 protein·min-1) | 4 | 0.023d | 0.046c | 0.058b | 0.062b | 0.088a |
8 | 0.304d | 0.400c | 0.496a | 0.393c | 0.432b | |
12 | 0.316d | 0.337d | 0.427a | 0.359c | 0.402b | |
CAT (mg-1 protein·min-1) | 4 | 0.080b | 0.062c | 0.084b | 0.075bc | 0.147a |
8 | 0.152c | 0.116d | 0.186b | 0.198b | 0.262a | |
12 | 0.236d | 0.366c | 0.490b | 0.469b | 0.602a |
Table 4 Effects of different treatment on SOD, POD and CAT activity in leaf of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings
处理Treatment | 天数Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOD (U·mg-1 protein) | 4 | 3.88b | 3.37d | 3.68c | 3.78bc | 4.26a |
8 | 3.98d | 3.62e | 4.15cd | 5.05b | 5.66a | |
12 | 4.28e | 4.99d | 5.73c | 6.11b | 7.94a | |
POD (mg-1 protein·min-1) | 4 | 0.023d | 0.046c | 0.058b | 0.062b | 0.088a |
8 | 0.304d | 0.400c | 0.496a | 0.393c | 0.432b | |
12 | 0.316d | 0.337d | 0.427a | 0.359c | 0.402b | |
CAT (mg-1 protein·min-1) | 4 | 0.080b | 0.062c | 0.084b | 0.075bc | 0.147a |
8 | 0.152c | 0.116d | 0.186b | 0.198b | 0.262a | |
12 | 0.236d | 0.366c | 0.490b | 0.469b | 0.602a |
处理Treatment | 天数Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDA (nmol·g-1 FW) | 4 | 4.72c | 4.82b | 4.84b | 5.38a | 4.85b |
8 | 5.77c | 5.38de | 5.15e | 9.19a | 8.10b | |
12 | 3.70de | 4.91c | 3.39e | 7.53a | 5.77b | |
膜透性 ELP(%) | 4 | 4.99bc | 5.03b | 4.87cd | 5.24a | 4.74d |
8 | 5.08d | 5.31bc | 5.15cd | 5.88a | 5.32b | |
12 | 5.20d | 5.47c | 5.17d | 6.74a | 6.03b |
Table 5 Effects of different treatment on MDA content and electrolytic leakage percentage (ELP) in leaf of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings
处理Treatment | 天数Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDA (nmol·g-1 FW) | 4 | 4.72c | 4.82b | 4.84b | 5.38a | 4.85b |
8 | 5.77c | 5.38de | 5.15e | 9.19a | 8.10b | |
12 | 3.70de | 4.91c | 3.39e | 7.53a | 5.77b | |
膜透性 ELP(%) | 4 | 4.99bc | 5.03b | 4.87cd | 5.24a | 4.74d |
8 | 5.08d | 5.31bc | 5.15cd | 5.88a | 5.32b | |
12 | 5.20d | 5.47c | 5.17d | 6.74a | 6.03b |
处理 Treatment | 天数 Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | ||
K+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 1.24c | 1.16d | 1.44b | 1.61c | 1.43b | 1.94a | 1.45b | 1.65c | 1.61a | 1.77b |
8 | 1.12c | 1.29c | 1.10c | 1.32c | 1.20b | 1.48b | 1.14c | 1.45b | 1.38a | 1.64a | |
12 | 1.04c | 1.20c | 1.05c | 1.41b | 1.18b | 1.52a | 1.21b | 1.40b | 1.49a | 1.47ab | |
Na+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.05d | 0.16d | 0.17c | 0.73b | 0.16c | 0.52c | 0.71a | 1.07a | 0.53b | 0.79b |
8 | 0.06e | 0.31d | 0.41c | 1.13b | 0.28d | 0.91c | 1.05a | 1.32a | 0.61b | 1.05bc | |
12 | 0.07d | 0.28e | 0.55c | 1.48bc | 0.44c | 1.17d | 1.29a | 1.99a | 1.04b | 1.35c | |
Ca2+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.13b | 0.13c | 0.14b | 0.14bc | 0.13b | 0.15b | 0.13b | 0.14bc | 0.17a | 0.18a |
8 | 0.13d | 0.12d | 0.15cd | 0.13d | 0.17bc | 0.17bc | 0.18b | 0.16c | 0.23a | 0.19a | |
12 | 0.14d | 0.15d | 0.18c | 0.18c | 0.21b | 0.20b | 0.22b | 0.19bc | 0.30a | 0.23a | |
Mg2+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.10e | 0.23d | 0.15d | 0.24d | 0.20c | 0.33b | 0.23b | 0.27c | 0.26a | 0.37a |
8 | 0.18e | 0.31d | 0.19de | 0.33cd | 0.21cd | 0.39b | 0.27b | 0.37b | 0.32a | 0.46a | |
12 | 0.20d | 0.35e | 0.22cd | 0.41d | 0.25c | 0.45c | 0.41b | 0.49b | 0.47a | 0.54a | |
Cl- (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.21e | 0.27e | 0.87c | 1.06cd | 0.74d | 0.96d | 1.19a | 1.66a | 1.01b | 1.29b |
8 | 0.26e | 0.37e | 1.16c | 1.70bc | 0.88d | 1.26d | 1.93a | 2.02a | 1.53b | 1.54c | |
12 | 0.27e | 0.31e | 1.33c | 2.06b | 1.02d | 1.58d | 2.06a | 2.26a | 1.65b | 1.79c |
Table 6 Effects of different treatment on K+、Na+、Ca2+、Mg2+ and Cl- content in shoot and root of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings
处理 Treatment | 天数 Days | S0 | S1 | S1P | S2 | S2P | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | 地上部 Shoot | 根 Root | ||
K+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 1.24c | 1.16d | 1.44b | 1.61c | 1.43b | 1.94a | 1.45b | 1.65c | 1.61a | 1.77b |
8 | 1.12c | 1.29c | 1.10c | 1.32c | 1.20b | 1.48b | 1.14c | 1.45b | 1.38a | 1.64a | |
12 | 1.04c | 1.20c | 1.05c | 1.41b | 1.18b | 1.52a | 1.21b | 1.40b | 1.49a | 1.47ab | |
Na+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.05d | 0.16d | 0.17c | 0.73b | 0.16c | 0.52c | 0.71a | 1.07a | 0.53b | 0.79b |
8 | 0.06e | 0.31d | 0.41c | 1.13b | 0.28d | 0.91c | 1.05a | 1.32a | 0.61b | 1.05bc | |
12 | 0.07d | 0.28e | 0.55c | 1.48bc | 0.44c | 1.17d | 1.29a | 1.99a | 1.04b | 1.35c | |
Ca2+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.13b | 0.13c | 0.14b | 0.14bc | 0.13b | 0.15b | 0.13b | 0.14bc | 0.17a | 0.18a |
8 | 0.13d | 0.12d | 0.15cd | 0.13d | 0.17bc | 0.17bc | 0.18b | 0.16c | 0.23a | 0.19a | |
12 | 0.14d | 0.15d | 0.18c | 0.18c | 0.21b | 0.20b | 0.22b | 0.19bc | 0.30a | 0.23a | |
Mg2+ (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.10e | 0.23d | 0.15d | 0.24d | 0.20c | 0.33b | 0.23b | 0.27c | 0.26a | 0.37a |
8 | 0.18e | 0.31d | 0.19de | 0.33cd | 0.21cd | 0.39b | 0.27b | 0.37b | 0.32a | 0.46a | |
12 | 0.20d | 0.35e | 0.22cd | 0.41d | 0.25c | 0.45c | 0.41b | 0.49b | 0.47a | 0.54a | |
Cl- (mmol· g-1 DW) | 4 | 0.21e | 0.27e | 0.87c | 1.06cd | 0.74d | 0.96d | 1.19a | 1.66a | 1.01b | 1.29b |
8 | 0.26e | 0.37e | 1.16c | 1.70bc | 0.88d | 1.26d | 1.93a | 2.02a | 1.53b | 1.54c | |
12 | 0.27e | 0.31e | 1.33c | 2.06b | 1.02d | 1.58d | 2.06a | 2.26a | 1.65b | 1.79c |
[1] | Chance B, Maehly AC (1955). Assay of catalases and peroxidases. In: Colouick SP, Kaplan NO eds. Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press Publisher, New York,746-755. |
[2] | Chu L (储玲), Liu DY (刘登义), Wang YB (王友保) (2004). Effect of copper pollution on seedling growth and activate oxygen metabolism of Trifolium pratense. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15,119-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Demir Y, Kocacaliskan I (2001). Effects of NaCl and proline on polyphenol oxidase activity in bean seedings. Bilogia Plantarum, 44,607-609. |
[4] | Dhindsa RS, Plumb_Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA (1981). Leafs enescence correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 32,93-101. |
[5] | Fedina IS, Georgieva K, Grigoreva I (2002). Light_dark changes in proline content of barley leaves under salt stress. Biologia Plantarum, 45,59-63. |
[6] | Heath RL, Packer L (1968). Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast. I. Kinetics and stoichemistry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 25,189-198. |
[7] | Hunt J (1982). Dilute hydrochloric acid extraction of plant material for routine cation anaslysis. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 13,49-55. |
[8] | IrigoyenJJ,Emerich DW, Sanchez_Diaz M (1992). Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa ( M. sativa) plants . Physiologia Plantarum, 84,55-60. |
[9] | Lin P (林鹏), Wang WQ (王文卿) (1999). Changes in the caloric values of Kandelia candel seedings under salt stress . Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23,466-470. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Liu HX (刘鸿先), Zeng SX (曾韶西), Wang YR (王以柔), Li P (李平), Chen DF (陈德峰), Guo JY (郭俊彦) (1985). The effect of low temperature on superoxide dismutase in various organelles of cucumber seedling cotyledon with different cold tolerance. Acta Phytophysiol Sinica (植物生理学报), 11,48-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Liu ZP (刘兆普), Liu L (刘玲), Chen MD (陈铭达) (2003). Study on the irrigation systems in agriculture by seawater. Journal of natural resources (自然资源学报), 18,423-429. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Long XH (隆小华), Liu ZP (刘兆普), Chen MD (陈铭达) (2005). Coupling effect of salt and fertilizer application on Helianthus tuberosus irrigated with seawater in semiarid region . Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 42,91-97. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Long XH (隆小华), Liu ZP (刘兆普), Liu L (刘玲) (2004). Effects of different concentrations of seawater on growths, developments and absorption of P of Helianthus tuberosus seedlings . Bulletin of botanical research (植物研究), 24,331-334. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Lu JL (陆景陵) (1994). Plant Nutrition (植物营养学). China Agricultural University Press, Beijing,32-33. (in Chinese) |
[15] | Peng CL (彭长连), Lin ZF (林植芳), Ling GZ (林桂珠) (2000). Photosynthesis and water use efficiency in wheat varieties differing in phosphate use efficiency. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 26,543-548. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Ren HX (任红旭), Chen X (陈雄), Wang YF (王亚馥) (2001). Changes in antioxidative enzymes and polyamines in wheat seedings with different drought resistance under drought and salt stress. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,709-715. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Shao J (邵晶), Liu L (刘玲), Liu ZP (刘兆普), Zheng QS (郑青松) (2005). Alleviatory effects of phosphorus on growth inhibition of seawater_stressed aloe seedlings. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 38,843-848. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Tanaka Y, Hibino T, Hayashi Y (1998). Salt tolerance of transgenetic rice overpression yeast mitochondrial Mn_SOD in chloroplasts. Plant Science, 148,131-138. |
[19] |
Tiwari BS, Belenghi B, Levine A (2002). Oxidative stress increased respiration and generation of reactive oxygen species, resulting in ATP depletion, opening of mintochondrial permeability trensition, and programmed cell death. Plant Physiology, 128,1271-1281.
URL PMID |
[20] | Xu ZB (徐质斌) (2000). Development prospect of seawater irrigating agriculture in Shandong Province. Development Forum (发展论坛), 8(1),24-25. (in Chinese) |
[21] | Yan XX, Zhao TE, Hu YJ (1994). Effect of moderate salt stress on cells in root tips of barley. Acta Agriculture Boreali_Sinica, 9(Suppl.),61-64. |
[22] | Yu BJ (於丙军), Luo QY (罗庆云), Liu YL (刘友良) (2001). Effects of salt stress on growth and ionic distribution of salt_born Glycinesoja. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 27,776-780. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Zhang BD (张邦定) (1997). The exploitation and planting of Helianthus tuberosus. Science and Technology of Agriculture in Sichuan. (四川农业科技), (5),35-37. (in Chinese) |
[24] | Zhang HY (张海燕), Zhao KF (赵可夫) (1998). Effects of salt and water stresss on osmotic adjustment of Suaeda salsa seedings . Acta Botanic Sinica (植物学报), 40,56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn