Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 344-353.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00034
Special Issue: 入侵生态学
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Tian-Yi, LIU Zeng-Hui, LOU An-Ru*()
Received:
2012-10-18
Accepted:
2013-01-25
Online:
2013-10-18
Published:
2013-04-09
Contact:
LOU An-Ru
CHEN Tian-Yi, LIU Zeng-Hui, LOU An-Ru. Phenotypic variation in populations of Solanum rostratum in different distribution areas in China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(4): 344-353.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00034
种群 Population | 生境 Habitat | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔 Elevation (m) | 种群密度 Population density (Ind.·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
新疆昌吉 (XJCJ) | 沙地 Sand | 87°09′50.0′′ | 43°52′35.8′′ | 790 | 1.67 |
山西阳高 (SXYG) | 公路旁 Road side | 113°58′14.2′′ | 40°26′1.8′′ | 1 048 | 5.00 |
张家口南 (ZJKNZ) | 铁道旁 Railroad side | 114°52′1.5′′ | 40°45′18.1′′ | 711 | 0.30 |
张家口纬三路 (ZJKWSL) | 公路旁 Road side | 114°55′16.8′′ | 40°45′38.1′′ | 729 | 0.63 |
张家口沙岭子 (ZJKSLZ) | 荒地 Wasteland | 114°55′47.7′′ | 40°39′57.5′′ | 650 | 0.40 |
北京通州 (BJTZ) | 河道旁 Channel side | 116°43′49.9′′ | 39°45′12.2′′ | 17 | 2.78 |
北京密云 (BJMY) | 公园 Park | 116°50′48.0′′ | 40°23′4.0′′ | 85 | 0.67 |
辽宁朝阳 (LNCY) | 河道旁 Channel side | 120°18′58.4′′ | 41°27′28.4′′ | 190 | 0.20 |
吉林白城 (JLBC) | 铁道旁 Railroad side | 122°50′11.3′′ | 45°35′23.4′′ | 154 | 0.25 |
Table 1 Information of Solanum rostratum in nine distribution areas in China
种群 Population | 生境 Habitat | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔 Elevation (m) | 种群密度 Population density (Ind.·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
新疆昌吉 (XJCJ) | 沙地 Sand | 87°09′50.0′′ | 43°52′35.8′′ | 790 | 1.67 |
山西阳高 (SXYG) | 公路旁 Road side | 113°58′14.2′′ | 40°26′1.8′′ | 1 048 | 5.00 |
张家口南 (ZJKNZ) | 铁道旁 Railroad side | 114°52′1.5′′ | 40°45′18.1′′ | 711 | 0.30 |
张家口纬三路 (ZJKWSL) | 公路旁 Road side | 114°55′16.8′′ | 40°45′38.1′′ | 729 | 0.63 |
张家口沙岭子 (ZJKSLZ) | 荒地 Wasteland | 114°55′47.7′′ | 40°39′57.5′′ | 650 | 0.40 |
北京通州 (BJTZ) | 河道旁 Channel side | 116°43′49.9′′ | 39°45′12.2′′ | 17 | 2.78 |
北京密云 (BJMY) | 公园 Park | 116°50′48.0′′ | 40°23′4.0′′ | 85 | 0.67 |
辽宁朝阳 (LNCY) | 河道旁 Channel side | 120°18′58.4′′ | 41°27′28.4′′ | 190 | 0.20 |
吉林白城 (JLBC) | 铁道旁 Railroad side | 122°50′11.3′′ | 45°35′23.4′′ | 154 | 0.25 |
种群 Population | 出苗时间 Emergence time | 长出第一片真叶时间 Time to have the first true leaf | 营养生长时间 Days of vegetative growth (d) | 进入花期时间 Time to blossom |
---|---|---|---|---|
JLBC | 9th | 14th | 53 | 62nd |
LNCY | 12th | 15th | 47 | 59th |
XJCJ | 8th | 14th | 47 | 55th |
ZJKSLZ | 9th | 15th | 51 | 60th |
SXYG | 8th | 14th | 45 | 53rd |
ZJKWSL | 8th | 14th | 49 | 57th |
BJMY | 8th | 14th | 49 | 57th |
ZJKNZ | 8th | 13th | 50 | 58th |
BJTZ | 7th | 13th | 48 | 55th |
Table 2 Comparison of growing situation of Solanum rostratum populations from different distribution areas in China (day)
种群 Population | 出苗时间 Emergence time | 长出第一片真叶时间 Time to have the first true leaf | 营养生长时间 Days of vegetative growth (d) | 进入花期时间 Time to blossom |
---|---|---|---|---|
JLBC | 9th | 14th | 53 | 62nd |
LNCY | 12th | 15th | 47 | 59th |
XJCJ | 8th | 14th | 47 | 55th |
ZJKSLZ | 9th | 15th | 51 | 60th |
SXYG | 8th | 14th | 45 | 53rd |
ZJKWSL | 8th | 14th | 49 | 57th |
BJMY | 8th | 14th | 49 | 57th |
ZJKNZ | 8th | 13th | 50 | 58th |
BJTZ | 7th | 13th | 48 | 55th |
种群 Population | 株高 PH (mm) | 冠幅 R (mm) | 叶长 LL (mm) | 叶宽 LW (mm) | 节间距 IS (mm) | 花冠直径 CD (mm) | 萼片长 S-L (mm) | 大雄蕊花药长 LSAL (mm) | 小雄蕊花药长 SSAL (mm) | 花柱长 SL (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLBC | 153.83 ± 5.35 | 119.62 ± 3.37 | 46.82 ± 1.17 | 38.85 ± 1.08 | 13.57 ± 0.61 | 24.06 ± 0.37 | 6.28 ± 0.16 | 8.80 ± 0.11 | 6.43 ± 0.14 | 10.90 ± 0.18 |
LNCY | 161.75 ± 8.90 | 127.75 ± 5.08 | 53.67 ± 1.71 | 43.58 ± 1.23 | 18.16 ± 1.05 | 25.33 ± 0.45 | 7.09 ± 0.20 | 9.58 ± 0.11 | 6.70 ± 0.10 | 12.87 ± 0.22 |
XJCJ | 180.07 ± 6.01 | 126.73 ± 2.68 | 51.66 ± 1.19 | 38.72 ± 0.89 | 18.02 ± 0.70 | 23.27 ± 0.22 | 6.23 ± 0.13 | 9.11 ± 0.10 | 7.09 ± 0.07 | 11.68 ± 01.3 |
ZJKSLZ | 133.75 ± 10.06 | 112.01 ± 6.72 | 49.69 ± 2.21 | 37.41 ± 1.65 | 12.91 ± 1.11 | 25.81 ± 0.48 | 7.19 ± 0.17 | 9.19 ± 0.11 | 6.64 ± 0.14 | 11.75 ± 0.13 |
SXYG | 137.06 ± 6.57 | 112.31 ± 3.22 | 43.71 ± 1.52 | 30.81 ± 1.03 | 13.13 ± 0.84 | 22.33 ± 0.37 | 5.16 ± 0.12 | 8.93 ± 0.07 | 6.40 ± 0.08 | 10.90 ± 0.11 |
ZJKWSL | 156.87 ± 5.44 | 125.98 ± 3.73 | 47.02 ± 2.03 | 37.65 ± 1.12 | 14.15 ± 0.59 | 26.19 ± 0.45 | 6.53 ± 0.21 | 9.55 ± 0.13 | 6.85 ± 0.12 | 12.46 ± 0.20 |
BJMY | 171.00 ± 6.44 | 136.38 ± 3.20 | 52.57 ± 1.28 | 44.20 ± 1.29 | 13.16 ± 0.56 | 24.72 ± 0.37 | 6.57 ± 0.19 | 9.55 ± 0.11 | 6.83 ± 0.10 | 12.25 ± 0.15 |
ZJKNZ | 159.77 ± 4.69 | 143.54 ± 4.92 | 54.15 ± 1.34 | 41.59 ± 1.01 | 13.09 ± 0.57 | 23.47 ± 0.30 | 5.98 ± 0.12 | 9.44 ± 0.16 | 6.96 ± 0.10 | 12.55 ± 0.19 |
BJTZ | 187.17 ± 4.51 | 145.83 ± 3.15 | 57.88 ± 1.53 | 45.67 ± 1.19 | 15.60 ± 0.50 | 23.68 ± 0.30 | 6.38 ± 0.14 | 9.33 ± 0.15 | 6.64 ± 0.11 | 11.57 ± 0.15 |
平均值 Average | 160.14 | 127.79 | 50.8 | 39.83 | 14.64 | 24.32 | 6.38 | 9.28 | 6.72 | 11.88 |
种群间F值 F value among populations | 6.888 | 8.576 | 7.594 | 12.399 | 9.124 | 11.546 | 13.503 | 5.82 | 4.525 | 18.06 |
p值 p value | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** |
Table 3 One-way ANOVA of phenotypic traits variance between Solanum rostratum populations from different distribution areas in China (mean ± SD)
种群 Population | 株高 PH (mm) | 冠幅 R (mm) | 叶长 LL (mm) | 叶宽 LW (mm) | 节间距 IS (mm) | 花冠直径 CD (mm) | 萼片长 S-L (mm) | 大雄蕊花药长 LSAL (mm) | 小雄蕊花药长 SSAL (mm) | 花柱长 SL (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLBC | 153.83 ± 5.35 | 119.62 ± 3.37 | 46.82 ± 1.17 | 38.85 ± 1.08 | 13.57 ± 0.61 | 24.06 ± 0.37 | 6.28 ± 0.16 | 8.80 ± 0.11 | 6.43 ± 0.14 | 10.90 ± 0.18 |
LNCY | 161.75 ± 8.90 | 127.75 ± 5.08 | 53.67 ± 1.71 | 43.58 ± 1.23 | 18.16 ± 1.05 | 25.33 ± 0.45 | 7.09 ± 0.20 | 9.58 ± 0.11 | 6.70 ± 0.10 | 12.87 ± 0.22 |
XJCJ | 180.07 ± 6.01 | 126.73 ± 2.68 | 51.66 ± 1.19 | 38.72 ± 0.89 | 18.02 ± 0.70 | 23.27 ± 0.22 | 6.23 ± 0.13 | 9.11 ± 0.10 | 7.09 ± 0.07 | 11.68 ± 01.3 |
ZJKSLZ | 133.75 ± 10.06 | 112.01 ± 6.72 | 49.69 ± 2.21 | 37.41 ± 1.65 | 12.91 ± 1.11 | 25.81 ± 0.48 | 7.19 ± 0.17 | 9.19 ± 0.11 | 6.64 ± 0.14 | 11.75 ± 0.13 |
SXYG | 137.06 ± 6.57 | 112.31 ± 3.22 | 43.71 ± 1.52 | 30.81 ± 1.03 | 13.13 ± 0.84 | 22.33 ± 0.37 | 5.16 ± 0.12 | 8.93 ± 0.07 | 6.40 ± 0.08 | 10.90 ± 0.11 |
ZJKWSL | 156.87 ± 5.44 | 125.98 ± 3.73 | 47.02 ± 2.03 | 37.65 ± 1.12 | 14.15 ± 0.59 | 26.19 ± 0.45 | 6.53 ± 0.21 | 9.55 ± 0.13 | 6.85 ± 0.12 | 12.46 ± 0.20 |
BJMY | 171.00 ± 6.44 | 136.38 ± 3.20 | 52.57 ± 1.28 | 44.20 ± 1.29 | 13.16 ± 0.56 | 24.72 ± 0.37 | 6.57 ± 0.19 | 9.55 ± 0.11 | 6.83 ± 0.10 | 12.25 ± 0.15 |
ZJKNZ | 159.77 ± 4.69 | 143.54 ± 4.92 | 54.15 ± 1.34 | 41.59 ± 1.01 | 13.09 ± 0.57 | 23.47 ± 0.30 | 5.98 ± 0.12 | 9.44 ± 0.16 | 6.96 ± 0.10 | 12.55 ± 0.19 |
BJTZ | 187.17 ± 4.51 | 145.83 ± 3.15 | 57.88 ± 1.53 | 45.67 ± 1.19 | 15.60 ± 0.50 | 23.68 ± 0.30 | 6.38 ± 0.14 | 9.33 ± 0.15 | 6.64 ± 0.11 | 11.57 ± 0.15 |
平均值 Average | 160.14 | 127.79 | 50.8 | 39.83 | 14.64 | 24.32 | 6.38 | 9.28 | 6.72 | 11.88 |
种群间F值 F value among populations | 6.888 | 8.576 | 7.594 | 12.399 | 9.124 | 11.546 | 13.503 | 5.82 | 4.525 | 18.06 |
p值 p value | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** | 0.000** |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | JLBC | LNCY | XJCJ | ZJKSLZ | SXYG | ZJKWSL | BJMY | ZJKNZ | BJTZ | 平均 Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 0.190 | 0.270 | 0.180 | 0.300 | 0.190 | 0.190 | 0.210 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.200 |
冠幅 R | 0.150 | 0.190 | 0.120 | 0.240 | 0.110 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.190 | 0.120 | 0.160 |
叶长 LL | 0.140 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.180 | 0.140 | 0.240 | 0.130 | 0.140 | 0.150 | 0.150 |
叶宽 LW | 0.150 | 0.140 | 0.130 | 0.180 | 0.130 | 0.160 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.140 | 0.150 |
节间距 IS | 0.250 | 0.280 | 0.210 | 0.350 | 0.250 | 0.230 | 0.230 | 0.240 | 0.170 | 0.250 |
营养性状平均 Average of vegetative traits | 0.176 | 0.208 | 0.154 | 0.250 | 0.164 | 0.196 | 0.172 | 0.172 | 0.142 | 0.182 |
花冠直径 CD | 0.080 | 0.100 | 0.050 | 0.100 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.080 |
萼片长 S-L | 0.140 | 0.160 | 0.120 | 0.130 | 0.120 | 0.170 | 0.160 | 0.110 | 0.120 | 0.140 |
大雄蕊花药长 LSAL | 0.070 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.040 | 0.070 | 0.060 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.070 |
小雄蕊花药长 SSAL | 0.120 | 0.080 | 0.050 | 0.120 | 0.070 | 0.100 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.090 | 0.090 |
花柱长 SL | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.050 | 0.090 | 0.070 | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.070 |
花部性状平均 Average of reproductive traits | 0.100 | 0.098 | 0.068 | 0.094 | 0.074 | 0.104 | 0.090 | 0.086 | 0.088 | 0.090 |
平均 Average | 0.138 | 0.153 | 0.111 | 0.172 | 0.119 | 0.150 | 0.131 | 0.129 | 0.115 | - |
Table 4 Coefficient of variation of phenotypic traits in Solanum rostratum populations from different distribution areas in China (%)
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | JLBC | LNCY | XJCJ | ZJKSLZ | SXYG | ZJKWSL | BJMY | ZJKNZ | BJTZ | 平均 Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 0.190 | 0.270 | 0.180 | 0.300 | 0.190 | 0.190 | 0.210 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.200 |
冠幅 R | 0.150 | 0.190 | 0.120 | 0.240 | 0.110 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.190 | 0.120 | 0.160 |
叶长 LL | 0.140 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.180 | 0.140 | 0.240 | 0.130 | 0.140 | 0.150 | 0.150 |
叶宽 LW | 0.150 | 0.140 | 0.130 | 0.180 | 0.130 | 0.160 | 0.160 | 0.130 | 0.140 | 0.150 |
节间距 IS | 0.250 | 0.280 | 0.210 | 0.350 | 0.250 | 0.230 | 0.230 | 0.240 | 0.170 | 0.250 |
营养性状平均 Average of vegetative traits | 0.176 | 0.208 | 0.154 | 0.250 | 0.164 | 0.196 | 0.172 | 0.172 | 0.142 | 0.182 |
花冠直径 CD | 0.080 | 0.100 | 0.050 | 0.100 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 0.080 |
萼片长 S-L | 0.140 | 0.160 | 0.120 | 0.130 | 0.120 | 0.170 | 0.160 | 0.110 | 0.120 | 0.140 |
大雄蕊花药长 LSAL | 0.070 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.040 | 0.070 | 0.060 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.070 |
小雄蕊花药长 SSAL | 0.120 | 0.080 | 0.050 | 0.120 | 0.070 | 0.100 | 0.080 | 0.080 | 0.090 | 0.090 |
花柱长 SL | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.050 | 0.090 | 0.070 | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.070 |
花部性状平均 Average of reproductive traits | 0.100 | 0.098 | 0.068 | 0.094 | 0.074 | 0.104 | 0.090 | 0.086 | 0.088 | 0.090 |
平均 Average | 0.138 | 0.153 | 0.111 | 0.172 | 0.119 | 0.150 | 0.131 | 0.129 | 0.115 | - |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 第1主成分 The first principal component | 第2主成分 The second principal component | 第3主成分 The third principal component |
---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 0.141 | -0.154 | 0.286 |
冠幅 R | 0.338 | -0.153 | -0.197 |
叶长 LL | 0.171 | -0.039 | 0.133 |
叶宽 LW | 0.144 | 0.032 | 0.121 |
节间距 IS | -0.173 | 0.030 | 0.709 |
花冠直径 CD | -0.120 | 0.396 | -0.008 |
萼片长 S-L | -0.166 | 0.351 | 0.296 |
大雄蕊花药长 LSAL | 0.204 | 0.176 | -0.279 |
小雄蕊花药长 SSAL | 0.183 | 0.013 | -0.090 |
花柱长 SL | 0.156 | 0.211 | -0.218 |
特征值 Eigen value | 5.143 | 2.215 | 1.007 |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 51.429 | 22.151 | 10.071 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 51.429 | 73.579 | 83.651 |
Table 5 Factor loadings, eigen value, contribution rate and cumulative contribution rate of the first three principal components
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 第1主成分 The first principal component | 第2主成分 The second principal component | 第3主成分 The third principal component |
---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 0.141 | -0.154 | 0.286 |
冠幅 R | 0.338 | -0.153 | -0.197 |
叶长 LL | 0.171 | -0.039 | 0.133 |
叶宽 LW | 0.144 | 0.032 | 0.121 |
节间距 IS | -0.173 | 0.030 | 0.709 |
花冠直径 CD | -0.120 | 0.396 | -0.008 |
萼片长 S-L | -0.166 | 0.351 | 0.296 |
大雄蕊花药长 LSAL | 0.204 | 0.176 | -0.279 |
小雄蕊花药长 SSAL | 0.183 | 0.013 | -0.090 |
花柱长 SL | 0.156 | 0.211 | -0.218 |
特征值 Eigen value | 5.143 | 2.215 | 1.007 |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 51.429 | 22.151 | 10.071 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 51.429 | 73.579 | 83.651 |
Fig. 1 Un-weight pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) cluster based on phenotypic traits of nine populations of Solanum rostratum. Abbreviation of populations see Table 1.
性状 Trait | 株高 PH | 冠幅 R | 叶长 LL | 叶宽 LW | 节间距 IS | 花冠直径 CD | 萼片长 SL | 大雄蕊 花药长 LSAL | 小雄蕊 花药长 SSAL | 花柱长 SL | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔 Elevation (m) | 种群密度 Population density (Ind.·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 1.000 | 0.793* | 0.737* | 0.735* | 0.570 | -0.164 | 0.088 | 0.344 | 0.523 | 0.234 | -0.342 | 0.042 | -0.517 | -0.059 |
冠幅 R | 1.000 | 0.835** | 0.811** | 0.175 | -0.115 | 0.039 | 0.574 | 0.500 | 0.470 | 0.027 | -0.306 | -0.480 | -0.176 | |
叶长 LL | 1.000 | 0.899** | 0.411 | 0.039 | 0.405 | 0.552 | 0.459 | 0.492 | -0.047 | -0.295 | -0.578 | -0.269 | ||
叶宽 LW | 1.000 | 0.335 | 0.258 | 0.542 | 0.608 | 0.363 | 0.541 | 0.189 | -0.143 | -0.825** | -0.496 | |||
节间距 IS | 1.000 | -0.003 | 0.277 | 0.200 | 0.363 | 0.284 | -0.472 | 0.247 | -0.175 | -0.047 | ||||
花冠直径 CD | 1.000 | 0.846** | 0.553 | 0.133 | 0.565 | 0.321 | -0.142 | -0.260 | -0.693* | |||||
萼片长 S-L | 1.000 | 0.490 | 0.208 | 0.538 | 0.174 | -0.022 | -0.502 | -0.743* | ||||||
大雄蕊花药长 LSAL | 1.000 | 0.553 | 0.932** | 0.139 | -0.601 | -0.257 | -0.413 | |||||||
小雄蕊花药长 SSAL | 1.000 | 0.631 | -0.640 | -0.045 | 0.148 | -0.392 | ||||||||
花柱长 SL | 1.000 | 0.073 | -0.384 | -0.150 | -0.592 | |||||||||
Sum |r| | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.424 | 2.226 | 3.893 | - |
Table 6 Correlation coefficient (r) between phenotypic traits and geographic factors of Solanum rostratum
性状 Trait | 株高 PH | 冠幅 R | 叶长 LL | 叶宽 LW | 节间距 IS | 花冠直径 CD | 萼片长 SL | 大雄蕊 花药长 LSAL | 小雄蕊 花药长 SSAL | 花柱长 SL | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔 Elevation (m) | 种群密度 Population density (Ind.·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 1.000 | 0.793* | 0.737* | 0.735* | 0.570 | -0.164 | 0.088 | 0.344 | 0.523 | 0.234 | -0.342 | 0.042 | -0.517 | -0.059 |
冠幅 R | 1.000 | 0.835** | 0.811** | 0.175 | -0.115 | 0.039 | 0.574 | 0.500 | 0.470 | 0.027 | -0.306 | -0.480 | -0.176 | |
叶长 LL | 1.000 | 0.899** | 0.411 | 0.039 | 0.405 | 0.552 | 0.459 | 0.492 | -0.047 | -0.295 | -0.578 | -0.269 | ||
叶宽 LW | 1.000 | 0.335 | 0.258 | 0.542 | 0.608 | 0.363 | 0.541 | 0.189 | -0.143 | -0.825** | -0.496 | |||
节间距 IS | 1.000 | -0.003 | 0.277 | 0.200 | 0.363 | 0.284 | -0.472 | 0.247 | -0.175 | -0.047 | ||||
花冠直径 CD | 1.000 | 0.846** | 0.553 | 0.133 | 0.565 | 0.321 | -0.142 | -0.260 | -0.693* | |||||
萼片长 S-L | 1.000 | 0.490 | 0.208 | 0.538 | 0.174 | -0.022 | -0.502 | -0.743* | ||||||
大雄蕊花药长 LSAL | 1.000 | 0.553 | 0.932** | 0.139 | -0.601 | -0.257 | -0.413 | |||||||
小雄蕊花药长 SSAL | 1.000 | 0.631 | -0.640 | -0.045 | 0.148 | -0.392 | ||||||||
花柱长 SL | 1.000 | 0.073 | -0.384 | -0.150 | -0.592 | |||||||||
Sum |r| | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.424 | 2.226 | 3.893 | - |
[1] |
Bais HP, Vepachedu R, Gilroy S, Callaway RM, Vivanco JM (2003). Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: from molecules and genes to species interactions. Science, 301, 1377-1380.
DOI URL PMID |
[2] | Bassett IJ, Munro DB (1986). The biology of Canadian weeds. 78. Solanum carolinense L. and Solanum rostratum Dunal. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 66, 977-991. |
[3] |
Bernd B, Rolf N (1995). Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology, 83, 887-889.
DOI URL |
[4] | Bowers KAW (1975). The pollination ecology of Solanum rostratum(Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany, 62, 633-638. |
[5] | Che JD, Liu QR, Hu B (2006). Alien invasive weed Solanum rostratum Dun. Weed Science, (3), 58-60. (in Chinese) |
[ 车晋滇, 刘全儒, 胡彬 (2006). 外来入侵杂草刺萼龙葵. 杂草科学, (3), 58-60.] | |
[6] | Chen L, Zhang H, Qiu XQ (2010). A study on phenotypic diversity in the natural population ofRosa banksiae Ait in Yunnan. Journal of Yunnan University, 32, 243-248. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 陈玲, 张颢, 邱显钦 (2010). 云南木香花天然居群的表型多样性研究. 云南大学学报, 32, 243-248.] | |
[7] | Dunn CP (2003). Keeping taxonomy based in morphology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 270-271. |
[8] | Ebeling SK, Hensen I, Auge H (2008). The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 225-233. |
[9] | Gao F, Xu C (2005). A potential dangerous alien plant—Solanum rostratum. Bulletin of Biology, 40, 11-12. (in Chinese) |
[ 高芳, 徐驰 (2005). 潜在危险性外来物种——刺萼龙葵. 生物学通报, 40, 11-12.] | |
[10] | Geng YP (2006). Adaptive Strategies of Invasive Alligator Weed, Alternanthera philoxeroides, in Heterogeneous Habitats. PhD dissertation, Fudan University, Shanghai. (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[ 耿宇鹏 (2006). 入侵种喜旱莲子草在异质生境中的适应对策研究. 博士学位论文, 复旦大学, 上海.] | |
[11] | Guan GQ, Gao DC, Li WY, Ye J, Xin XG, Li SD (1984). Solanum rostratum Dunal—a quarantine weed. Plant Quarantine, (4), 25-28. (in Chinese) |
[ 关广清, 高东昌, 李文耀, 叶金, 辛孝贵, 李树德 (1984). 刺萼龙葵——一种检疫性杂草. 植物检疫, (4), 25-28.] | |
[12] | He JY, Khasbagan , Mongenqiqig , Hu MZ (2011). Solanum rostratum Dunal: a newly invaded alien plant of Inner Mongolia. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 40, 288-290. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 贺俊英, 哈斯巴根, 孟根其其格, 胡美珠 (2011). 内蒙古新外来入侵植物——黄花刺茄(Solanum rostratum Dunal). 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版), 40, 288-290.] | |
[13] | Lee CE (2002). Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 386-391. |
[14] |
Leger EA, Rice KJ (2007). Assessing the speed and predictability of local adaptation in invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1090-1103.
URL PMID |
[15] | Li L, Liu T, Liu B, Liu ZQ, Si LM, Zhang R (2010). Phenotypic variation and covariation among natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana in North Xinjiang. Biodiversity Science, 18, 497-508. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李磊, 刘彤, 刘斌, 刘忠权, 司朗明, 张荣 (2010). 新疆北部拟南芥自然居群表形变异与协变. 生物多样性, 18, 497-508.] | |
[16] | Lin Y, Tan DY (2007). The potential and exotic invasive plant:Solanum rostratum. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 45, 675-685. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 林玉, 谭敦炎 (2007). 一种潜在的外来入侵植物: 黄花刺茄. 植物分类学报, 45, 675-685.] | |
[17] | Lu WD (2010). SPSS for Windows. 4th edn. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 卢纹岱 (2010). 统计分析. 第4版. 电子工业出版社, 北京.] | |
[18] | Maron JL, Vila M (2001). When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos, 95, 361-373. |
[19] | Moloney KA, Holzapfel C, Tielbörger K, Jeltsch F, Schurr FM (2009). Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 11, 311-320. |
[20] | Niu HY, Shen H, Ye WH (2010). Whole-range studies on alien plant invasion: recent progress and future prospects. Biodiversity Science, 18, 559-568. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 牛红玉, 沈浩, 叶万辉 (2010). 外来植物入侵的全境性研究进展与展望. 生物多样性, 18, 559-568.] | |
[21] | Nong YX, Jiang YS, Wei X, Chai SF, Tang H, Luo BL (2010). Study on phenotypic variation of Camellia tunghinensis Chang. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 18, 372-378. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 农月香, 蒋运生, 韦霄, 柴胜丰, 唐辉, 罗宝丽 (2010). 东兴金花茶表型变异研究. 热带亚热带植物学报, 18, 372-378.] | |
[22] | Pang GC, Jiang DM (1995). Population genetic diversity and data analysis. Scientia Sitvae Sinicae, 31, 543-550. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 庞广昌, 姜冬梅 (1995). 群体遗传多样性和数据分析. 林业科学, 31, 543-550.] | |
[23] | Pigliucci M.(2001). Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. |
[24] | Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000). Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience, 50, 53-65. |
[25] | Qu B, Wang CX, Zhao D, Zhang GL, Fu WD, Chen XH, Li TL (2011). The control effectiveness of three herbicides on Solanum rostratum at its seedling stage. Pratacultural Science, 28, 614-617. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 曲波, 王承旭, 赵丹, 张国良, 付卫东, 陈旭辉, 李天来 (2011). 3种除草剂对苗期刺萼龙葵的防除试验. 草业科学, 28, 614-617.] | |
[26] | Siemann E, Rogers WE (2001). Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecology Letters, 4, 514-518. |
[27] | Sultan SE (2000). Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends in Plant Science, 12, 537-542. |
[28] | Todd JE (1882). On the flowers of Solanum rostratum and Cassia chamaecrista. The American Naturalist, 16, 281-287. |
[29] | Wang D, Pang CH, Gao YH, Hao XJ, Wang YL (2010). Phenotypic diversity of Acer ginnala (Aceraceae) populations at different altitude. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 32, 117-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王丹, 庞春华, 高亚卉, 郝晓杰, 王祎玲 (2010). 茶条槭不同海拔种群的表型多样性. 云南植物研究, 32, 117-125.] | |
[30] | Williams DG, Mack RN, Black RA (1995). Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology, 76, 1569-1580. |
[31] | Xiao HJ, Xu Z, Li LH, Ma YB (2007). Correlation analysis between the variation of phenotypic characters and the habitat of Roegneria kamoji Ohwi. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 29, 22-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 肖海峻, 徐柱, 李临杭, 马玉宝 (2007). 鹅观草表型性状变异与生境间的相关性. 中国草地学报, 29, 22-30.] | |
[32] | Yang J (1991). Infraspecific variation in plant and the exploring methods. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 9, 185-195. (in Chinese) |
[ 杨继 (1991). 植物种内形态变异的机制及其研究方法. 武汉植物学研究, 9, 185-195.] | |
[33] | Zhang JH (1998). Variation and allometry of seed weight in Aeschynomene americana. Annals of Botany, 82, 843-847. |
[34] | Zhang SY, Wei SH, Zhang CX, Huang HJ, Cui HL, Li XJ, Wang JX (2011). Research advances on seed dormancy and germination of bffalobur (Solanum rostratum). Weed Science, 29(2), 5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张少逸, 魏守辉, 张朝贤, 黄红娟, 崔海兰, 李香菊, 王金信 (2011). 刺萼龙葵种子休眠和萌发特性研究进展. 杂草科学, 29(2), 5-9.] | |
[35] | Zhao X, Zhao SJ (2007). Phenotypic diversity of different Aquilaria sinensis(Lour.) Spreng populations. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 35, 117-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 赵翾, 赵树进 (2007). 白木香群体的表型多样性分析. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 35, 117-122.] | |
[36] | Zhao XY, Ma XD, Xu ZW (2007). Non-native Solanum Rostratum and its ecological significance appeared in Ürümqi, Xinjiang. Advances in Earth Science, 22, 675-685. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 赵晓英, 马晓东, 徐郑伟 (2007). 外来植物刺萼龙葵及其在乌鲁木齐出现的生态学意义. 地球科学进展, 22, 675-685.] | |
[37] | Zhong GP, Shen WJ, Wan FH, Wang JJ (2009). Potential distribution areas of Solanum rostratum in China: a prediction with GARP niche model. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 162-166. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 钟艮平, 沈文君, 万方浩, 王进军 (2009). 用GARP生态位模型预测刺萼龙葵在中国的潜在分布区. 生态学杂志, 28, 162-166.] |
[1] | CHENG Si-Qi, JIANG Feng, JIN Guang-Ze. Leaf economics spectrum of broadleaved seedlings and its relationship with defense traits in a temperate forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 678-686. |
[2] | SUN Wen-Tai, MA Ming. Response of soil physical degradation and fine root growth on long-term film mulching in apple orchards on Loess Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(9): 972-986. |
[3] | DONG Lin-Lin, PU Xiao-Yan, ZHANG Lu-Lu, SONG Liang, LU Zhi-Yun, LI Su. Pressure-volume curve analysis of epiphytic lichens and its applicability in subtropical forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(3): 274-285. |
[4] | DONG Zheng-Wu, ZHAO Ying, LEI Jia-Qiang, XI Yin-Qiao. Distribution pattern and influencing factors of soil salinity at Tamarix cones in the Taklimakan Desert [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(8): 873-884. |
[5] | HE Qing-Hai, YANG Shao-Zong, LI Yin-Gang, SHEN Xin, LIU Xin-Hong. Phenotypic variations in seed and fruit traits of Liquidambar formosana populations [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(7): 752-763. |
[6] | Jiang-Qun LIU, Ming-Yu YIN, Si-Yu ZUO, Shao-Bing YANG, Tana WUYUN. Phenotypic variations in natural populations of Amygdalus pedunculata [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(10): 1091-1102. |
[7] | Ming-Yu YIN, Zhong-Mao JIANG, Xu-Chun ZHU, Wen-Quan BAO, Han ZHAO, Tana WUYUN. High-level phenotypic variations in populations of Armeniaca sibirica in Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(10): 1090-1099. |
[8] | LI Yin-Gang, LIU Xin-Hong, MA Jun-Wei, SHI Cong-Guang, ZHU Guang-Quan. Phenotypic variations in populations of Phoebe chekiangensis [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(12): 1315-1324. |
[9] | CI Dun-Wei,DAI Liang-Xiang,SONG Wen-Wu,ZHANG Zhi-Meng. Genotypic differences in salt tolerance from germination to seedling stage in peanut [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(11): 1018-1027. |
[10] | LI Shuai-Feng,SU Jian-Rong,LIU Wan-De,LANG Xue-Dong,ZHANG Zhi-Jun,SU Lei,JIA Cheng-Xin-Zhuo,YANG Hua-Jing. Phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis populations in Yunnan Province, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(11): 998-1009. |
[11] | PENG Xing-Min, WU Jiang-Chong, ZHENG Yi-Xing, ZHANG Yan-Ping, LI Gen-Qian. Phenotypic variation in cultivated populations of Azadirachta indica in Yunnan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(6): 560-571. |
[12] | LI He, ZHANG Wei-Kang, WANG Guo-Hong. Relationship between climatic factors and geographical distribution of spruce forests in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(5): 372-381. |
[13] | LI Lei, LIU Tong, LIU Bin, SI Lang-Ming, LIU Zhong-Quan, SUN Qin-Ming, SHEN Xue-Ying. Environment-dependent phenotypic variation among natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana in the northern Tianshan Mountains [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(11): 1310-1318. |
[14] | GU Yun-Jie, LUO Jian-Xun, WU Yuan-Wei, CAO Xiao-Jun. PHENOTYPIC DIVERSITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF PICEA BALFOURIANAIN SICHUAN, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(2): 291-301. |
[15] | YANG Juan, GE Jian-Ping, LIU Li-Juan, DING Yi, TAN Ying-Chun. GAP-PHASE REGENERATION RULES OF CONIFER-BROADLEAVED MIXED FOREST IN WOLONG NATURE RESERVE, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(3): 425-430. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn