EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ON STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF WOODY SPECIES OF THE NOKREK BIOSPHERE RESERVE OF MEGHALAYA, NORTHEAST INDIA

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Aims Our study was conducted in the Nokrek Biosphere Reserve (NBR) in the Garo hills districts of Meghalaya, Northeast India. Our aim was to assess the effects of human activities on plant diversity, population structure and regeneration.
Methods We selected a representative 1.2 hm² stand in both the core and buffer zones of NBR. Structure and composition were determined by randomly sampling square quadrats, population structure was assessed by determining age structure, and regeneration was assessed by measuring densities of seedling, sapling and adult trees.
Important findings More woody species were recorded from the core zone than the buffer zone (87 vs. 81 species), and there were a large number of tropical, temperate, and Sino-Himalayan, Burma-Malaysian and Malayan elements, primitive families and primitive genera. The trees were distributed in three distinct strata, canopy, subcanopy and sapling. Subcanopy and sapling layers had the highest species richness (81%-88%). Lauraceae and Euphorbiaceae were the dominant families in terms of the number of species, and a large number of families were represented by single species. Most woody species (57%-79%) were contagiously distributed and had low frequency (<20%). Although stand density was high in the buffer zone, its basal area was low compared to the stand in the core zone. Low similarity and high β-diversity indicate marked differences in species composition of the stands. Shannon diversity index was high in both the stands, while Simpson dominance index was low. The diameter-class distribution for dominant species revealed that the most had a large number of young individuals in their populations. Preponderance of tree seedlings, followed by a steep decline in population density of saplings and adult trees, indicated that the seedling to sapling stage was the most critical in the life cycle of the tree populations. Most species (42%-48%) had no regeneration, 25%-35% had good/fair regeneration, and the rest had poor regeneration or reoccurred as immigrants.

Key words: Nokrek Biosphere Reserve, dispersion pattern, population structure, regeneration, species richness, stratification

Tripathi OP, Pandey HN, Tripathi RS. EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ON STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF WOODY SPECIES OF THE NOKREK BIOSPHERE RESERVE OF MEGHALAYA, NORTHEAST INDIA[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(1): 73-79.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.008

https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/Y2008/V32/I1/73

Figures/Tables 7

References 35

[1]	Aiba S, Kitayama K (1999). Structure, composition and species diversity in an altitude-substrate matrix of rain forest tree communities on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Plant Ecology, 140, 139-157.
[2]	Armesto JJ, Mitchell JD, Villagran C (1986). A comparison of spatial patterns of trees in some tropical and temperate forests. Biotropica, 18, 1-11.
[3]	Armesto JJ, Pickett STA (1985). Experiments on disturbance in old-filed plant communities: impact on species richness and abundance. Ecology, 66, 230-240.
[4]	Ashton MS (1995). Seedling growth of co-occurring Shorea species in the simulated light environments of a rainforest. Forest Ecology and Management, 72, 1-12.
[5]	Ayyappan N (2002). Biodiversity of Trees and Short-Term Population Changes in a Tropical Evergreen Forest in the Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. PhD dissertation, Pandicherry University, Pandicherry, India.
[6]	Balakrishnan NP (1981-1983). Flora of Jowai and Vicinity, Vol. 2. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah,
[7]	Bhuyan P, Khan ML, Tripathi RS (2003). Tree diversity and population structure in undisturbed and human-impacted stands of tropical wet evergreen forest in Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalayas India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1753-1773.
[8]	Bunyavejchewin S (1999). Structure and dynamics in seasonal dry evergreen forest in northeastern Thailand. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 787-792.
[9]	Campbell DG, Stone JL, Rosas A Jr (1992). A composition of the phytosociology of three floodplain (varzea) forests of known ages, Rio Jurua, western Brazalian Amazon. Botanical Journal of Linnaean Society, 108, 213-237.
[10]	Champion HG, Seth SK (1968). A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India Publication, Delhi.
[11]	Clarke JS, Beckage B, Camill P, Cleveland J, Hillerislambers J, Lichter J, Mclachlan J, Mohan J, Wyckoof P (1999). Interpreting recruitment limitation in forests. American Journal of Botany, 86, 1-16. URL PMID
[12]	Dochok R, Kent K, Khumbongmayum AD, Paul A, Khan ML (2005). Population structure and regeneration status of medicinal tree Illicium griffithii in relation to disturbance gradients in temperate broad-leaved forest of Arunachal Pradesh. Current Science, 89, 673-676.
[13]	Evans J (2001). The Forest Handbook. Vol. 1. Blackwell Science Ltd., USA.
[14]	Felfili M, Maria J (1995). Diversity, structure and dynamics of a gallery forest in central Brazil. Vegetatio, 117, 1-15.
[15]	Haridasan K, Rao RR (1985-1987). Forest Flora of Meghalaya, Vol. 2. Bishen Singh Mahendrapal Singh, Dehra Dun, India.
[16]	Kadavul K, Parthasarathy N (1999). Plant biodiversity and conservation of tropical semi-evergreen forest in the Shervarayan hills of Eastern Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 421-439.
[17]	Khan ML, Rai JPN, Tripathi RS (1987). Population structure of some tree species in disturbed and protected sub-tropical forests of Northeast India. Acta Oecologia, 8, 247-255.
[18]	Magurran AE (1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[19]	Mesquita RCG, Ickes K, Ganade G, Williamson GB (2001). Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon basin. Journal of Ecology, 89, 528-537.
[20]	Misra R (1968). Ecology Work Book. Oxford-IBH Publishing Company, Calcutta.
[21]	Mishra BP, Tripathi OP, Tripathi RS, Pandey HN (2004). Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, Northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 421-436.
[22]	Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974). Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
[23]	Parthasarathy N, Karthikeyan R (1997). Population structure of Grewia pandaica, a rare and endemic tree species in south-west India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 23, 85-90.
[24]	Pascal JP, Pelissier R (1996). Structure and floristic composition of a tropical rain forest in Southwest India. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 12, 195-218.
[25]	Pelissier R, Riera B (1993). Dix ans de dynamique d'une forêt dense humide de Guyane FranÇaise. Revista d'Ecologie (la Terre et la Vie), 48, 21-33.
[26]	Puri GS (1960). Indian Forest Ecology. Oxford Book & Stationary Co., New Delhi.
[27]	Quintam-Ascencio PF, Menges ES, Weekley CW (2003). A fire explicit population viability analysis of Hypericum cumulicola in Florida rosemary scrub. Conservation Biology, 17, 433-449.
[28]	Richards PW (1996). The Tropical Rain Forests, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[29]	Shankar U (2001). A case study of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science, 81, 776-786.
[30]	Turner IM (1996). Species loss in fragments of tropical forest: a review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 200-209.
[31]	Tripathi OP (2002). Study of Distribution Pattern and Ecological Analysis of Major Forest Types of Meghalaya. PhD dissertation, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong.
[32]	Upadhaya K, Pandey HN, Law PS, Tripathi RS (2003). Tree diversity in sacred groves of Jaintia Hills in Meghalaya, Northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 583-597.
[33]	Valencia R, Balsley H, Paz Y, Mi†o G (1994). High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation, 3, 21-28.
[34]	Vazquez JA, Givnish TJ (1998). Altitudinal gradients in tropical forest composition, structure, and diversity in the Sierra de Manantlan. Journal of Ecology, 86, 999-1020.
[35]	Whitford PB (1948). Distribution of woodland plants in relation to succession and clonal growth. Ecology, 30, 199-208.

Forest stands	Stratification			Distribution pattern
Forest stands	Canopy	Sub-canopy	Tree-let	Regular	Random	Clumped
Buffer zone	11 (13.6)	37 (45.7)	33 (40.7)	11 (13.6)	24 (29.6)	46 (56.8)
Core zone	15 (17.2)	41 (47.1)	31 (35.7)	5 (5.8)	13 (14.9)	69 (79.3)

Forest stands	Stratification			Distribution pattern
Forest stands	Canopy	Sub-canopy	Tree-let	Regular	Random	Clumped
Buffer zone	11 (13.6)	37 (45.7)	33 (40.7)	11 (13.6)	24 (29.6)	46 (56.8)
Core zone	15 (17.2)	41 (47.1)	31 (35.7)	5 (5.8)	13 (14.9)	69 (79.3)

Variables	Buffer zone	Core zone
Density (ind.·hm^-2)	1 023	834
Basal cover (m²·hm^-2)	33.3	38.8
Species richness	81	87
Number of genera	63	65
Number of families	36	38
Shannon diversity index	4.20	4.20
Simpson dominance index	0.02	0.02

Variables	Buffer zone	Core zone
Density (ind.·hm^-2)	1 023	834
Basal cover (m²·hm^-2)	33.3	38.8
Species richness	81	87
Number of genera	63	65
Number of families	36	38
Shannon diversity index	4.20	4.20
Simpson dominance index	0.02	0.02

Forest stands	Regeneration status (number of species)
Forest stands	Good	Fair	Poor	None	New
Buffer zone	9 (8.5)	20 (19.8)	6 (5.6)	45 (42.3)	26 (24.4)
Core zone	5 (5)	26 (25.7)	7 (6.9)	48 (47.5)	14 (13.9)