5种绿化树种叶片比叶重、光合色素含量和δ13C的开度与方位差异

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

受太阳活动的影响, 树冠不同方位以及内外部的叶片接受到的光照存在差异, 造成温度、湿度等小气候因子也存在差异。叶片的形态解剖结构和生理特性等会对外界环境条件的改变发生响应。为了更好地了解树木生长的局部小环境条件差异对树木生长的影响, 该文选择国槐(Sophora japonica)、悬铃木(Platanus orientalis)、银杏(Ginkgo biloba)、榕树(Ficus microcarpa)和黄葛榕(F. lacor)5种冠幅较大的树种, 通过测定树冠内外部及4个方位上的比叶重(leaf mass per area, LMA)、叶绿素a (chlorophyll a, Chl a)、叶绿素b (chlorophyll b, Chl b)及类胡萝卜素(carotenoid, Car)的含量及碳稳定同位素比率(carbon isotope ratio, δ¹³C)等指标, 研究叶片形态、生理指标等随树冠开度的变化以及方位差异。结果表明, 叶片LMA和δ¹³C均随树冠开度增加而增大, 光合色素含量则相反; 叶片LMA和δ¹³C的方位变化则是南向>西向>北向>东向, 与叶片所接受到的光强变化规律一致, 而光合色素含量的方位差异较复杂、且因树种而异, 总的来说, 以受光最弱的东向含量最高。上述结果表明, 树冠外围和南向、西向的叶片由于接受到的光能较多、温度高、相对湿度小等, 其叶片会增大单位面积的重量、减小气孔开度和光合色素含量, 从而减少对光能的吸收, 也使光合作用降低、δ¹³C增大, 而不同方位光照对光合色素含量的影响机制较为复杂, 这些都表明了叶片对周围小气候的形态和生理上的适应。

关键词: δ¹³C, 类胡萝卜素, 叶绿素, 开度, 比叶重, 方位

Abstract:

Aims Light, temperature and humidity conditions differ among individual leaves and may influence leaf morphology, anatomy, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content and distribution and leaf photosynthetic processes. Our objective was to determine the influence of local microenvironment on structure and biophysical characteristics of leaves through research on changes of leaf morphology and biophysical indices along the lateral distribution of leaves within tree crowns and with orientation differences.

Methods We selected five tree species with wide crowns (Sophora japonica, Platanus orientalis, Ginkgo biloba, Ficus microcarpa and F. lacor) and measured leaf photosynthetic pigments (including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids), leaf mass per area (LMA) and carbon isotope ratio (δ¹³C) along the horizontal distance from the sample point to the tree trunk and with different orientations in each tree species. Pigment content was measured by colorimetry, LMA as the ratio of leaf dry mass to fresh area and δ¹³C with a mass spectrograph.

Important findings Leaf δ¹³C and LMA increased and photosynthetic pigment decreased with horizontal distance from the sample point to the trunk. Leaf δ¹³C and LMA also differed by orientation, with southward leaves having the highest values, followed by westward leaves, and eastward leaves having the lowest values. Photosynthetic pigments had a more complex relation with orientation, although chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a to b ratio and carotenoids were the highest in eastward leaves. These results suggest that southward, westward and leaves on the outside of the crown have increased LMA, reduced stomatal aperture and photosynthetic pigment content and, as a result, decreased photosynthesis and increased δ¹³C values in response to stronger irradiance, higher temperature and lower humidity. Therefore, local microenvironmental differences within an individual tree greatly influence leaf morphological and biophysical characteristics.

Key words: carbon isotope ratio, carotenoid, chlorophyll, lateral spread of crown, leaf mass per area, orientation

何春霞, 李吉跃, 张燕香, 郑泉水, 谢博, 丁昳婷. 5种绿化树种叶片比叶重、光合色素含量和δ¹³C的开度与方位差异. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(2): 134-143. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.004

HE Chun-Xia, LI Ji-Yue, ZHANG Yan-Xiang, ZHENG Quan-Shui, XIE Bo, DING Yi-Ting. Differences in leaf mass per area, photosynthetic pigments and δ¹³C by orientation and crown position in five greening tree species. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(2): 134-143. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.004

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.02.004

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2010/V34/I2/134

图/表 3

参考文献 37

[1]	Arnold LD (1979). The Climatic Response in the Partitioning of the Stable Isotopes of Carbon in Juniper Trees from Arizona. University of Arizona, Tucson.
[2]	Chen T (陈拓), Qin DH (秦大河), He YQ (何元庆), Ren JW (任贾文), Liu XH (刘晓宏) (2002). The pattern of stable carbon isotope ratios in Sabina przewalskii. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology (冰川冻土), 24, 571-573. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	Fan DY (樊大勇), Zhang WF (张旺峰), Chen ZG (陈志刚), Xie ZQ (谢宗强) (2005). Acclimation of Cathaya argyrophylla to light across a gradient of canopy openness. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29, 713-723. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA (1982). On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 9, 121-137.
[5]	Feng YL (冯玉龙), Cao KF (曹坤芳), Feng ZL (冯志立), Ma L (马玲) (2002). Acclimation of lamina mass per unit area, photosynthetic characteristics and dark respiration to growth light regimes in four tropical rainforest species. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22, 901-910. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Francey RJ, Farquhar GD (1982). An explanation of ¹³C/¹²C variations in tree rings. Nature, 297, 28-31. DOI URL
[7]	Grassi G, Colom MR, Minotta G (2001). Effect of nutrient supply on photosynthetic acclimation and photo inhibition of one-year-old foliage of Picea abies. Physiologia Plantarum, 111, 245-254.
[8]	Green D, Skkpuger EL (2001). Light mediated constraints on leaf function correlate with leaf structure among deciduous and evergreen tree species. Tree Physiology, 21, 1341-1346. URL PMID
[9]	Han XG (韩兴国), Yan CR (严昌荣), Chen LZ (陈灵芝), Mei XR (梅旭荣) (2000). Stable carbon isotope characteristics of some woody plants in warm temperate zone. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 11, 497-500. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	He CX (何春霞), Li JY (李吉跃), Guo M (郭明) (2007). Research progresses of the mechanism of the sap flow in trees. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 329-337. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	He CX (何春霞), Li JY (李吉跃), Guo M (郭明), Wang YT (王玉涛), Chen C (陈崇) (2008). Changes of leaf photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency along tree height of 4 tree species. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 28, 3008-3016. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	He CX, Li JY, Zhou P, Guo M, Zheng QS (2008). Changes of leaf morphological, anatomical structure and carbon isotope ratio with the height of the Wangtian Tree ( Parashorea chinensis) in Xishuangbanna, China. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50, 168-173. DOI URL PMID
[13]	He FL (何凤梨), Wang F (王飞), Wei QP (魏钦平), Wang XW (王小伟), Zhang Q (张强) (2008). Relationship between distribution of relative light intensity in canopy and yield and quality of peach fruit. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 41, 502-507. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Johnson RC, Li Y (1999). Water relations, forage production, and photosynthesis in tall fescue divergently selected for carbon isotope discrimination. Crop Science, 39, 1663-1670.
[15]	Kitao M, Lei TT, Koike T, Tobita H, Maruyama Y (2000). Susceptibility to photo inhibition of three deciduous broad leaf tree species with different successional traits raised under various light regimes. Plant, Cell and Enviornment, 23, 81-89.
[16]	Koch GW, Sillett SC, Jennings GM, Davis SD (2004). The limits to tree height. Nature, 428, 851-854. DOI URL PMID
[17]	Leavitt SW, Long A (1982). Evidence for ¹³C/¹²C fractionation between tree leaves and wood. Nature, 298, 742-744. DOI URL
[18]	Leavitt SW, Long A (1986). Stable carbon isotope variability in tree foliage and wood. Ecology, 67, 1002-1010. DOI URL
[19]	Li W (李伟), Cao KF (曹坤芳) (2006). Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in seedlings of Terminthia paniculata grown under different light level. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 26, 266-275. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Lin ZF (林植芳), Lin GZ (林桂珠), Kong GH (孔国辉), Zhang HB (张鸿彬) (1995). Effect of growth irradiance on stable carbon isotope ratio, intercellular CO₂ concentration and water-use efficiency of two woody plants in subtropical natural forest. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany (热带亚热带植物学报), 3(2), 77-82. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Lü JL (吕建林), Chen RK (陈如凯), Zhang MQ (张木清), Li CM (李才明), Liao JF (廖建峰) (1998). Seasonal change of the net photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll content and specific weight of leaf of sugarcane and their relationships. Journal of Fujian Agriculture University (Natural Sciences) (福建农业大学学报), 27, 285-290. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	McCarroll D, Pawellek F (2001). Stable carbon isotope ratios of Pinus sylvestris from northern Finland and the potential for extracting a climate signal from long Fennoscandian chronologies. The Holocene, 11, 517-526. DOI URL
[23]	O'leary MH (1981). Carbon isotope fractionation in plants. Phytochemistry, 20, 553-567. DOI URL
[24]	O'leary MH (1988). Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. BioScience, 38, 328-336. DOI URL
[25]	Panek JA, Waring RH (1995). Carbon isotope variation in Douglas fir foliage: improving the climate relationship. Tree Physiology, 15, 657-663. URL PMID
[26]	Rao NRC, Wright GC (1994). Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope discrimination across environment in peanut. Crop Science, 34, 98-103. DOI URL
[27]	Rosati A, Badeck FW, Dejong TM (2001). Estimating canopy light interception and absorption using leaf mass per unit leaf area in Solanum melongena. Annual of Botany, 88, 101-109.
[28]	Rosati A, Esparza GD, Ejong TM, Pearcy RW (1999). Influence of canopy light environment and nitrogen availability on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of field-grown nectarine trees. Tree Physiology, 19, 173-180. DOI URL PMID
[29]	Tang HG (汤红官), Chen T (陈拓), Qiang WY (强维亚) (2002). Preliminary study on direction variabilities of stable carbon isotope ratios and its mechanisms in trees. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences) 兰州大学学报(自然科学版)), 38(5), 58-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Tans PP, Mook WG (1980). Past atmospheric CO₂ level and the ¹³C/¹²C ratios in tree rings. Tellus, 32, 268-283. DOI URL
[31]	Vincent G (2001). Leaf photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen content adjustment to canopy openness in tropical forest tree seedlings. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17, 495-509.
[32]	Wang BY (王博轶), Feng YL (冯玉龙) (2005). Effects of growth light intensities on photosynthesis in seedlings of two tropical rain forest species. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]	Wang J (王建) , Zhao XY (赵兴云), Qian JL (钱君龙) (2006). An investigation into the causes of the azimuth variations of δ¹³C in Cryptomeria fortunei tree rings at Tianmu Mountain. Geographical Research (地理研究), 25, 242-254. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]	Wang XK (王学奎) (2006). Principle and Technique of Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experiment (植物生理生化实验原理和技术) 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing. 134-136. (in Chinese)
[35]	Zhang JG (张建光), Li YL (李英丽), Liu YF (刘玉芳), Di B (邸葆), Sun JS (孙建设) (2004). Effects of high temperature and strong light on oxidative stress of apple fruit peel on different exposures of tree crown. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 37, 1976-1980. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	Zhang XC (张显川), Gao ZQ (高照全), Shu XY (舒先迂), Wei QP (魏钦平) (2005). The different ability of photosynthesis and transpiration in different canopy positions of apple with open-center system. Acta Horticulturae Sinica (园艺学报), 32, 975-979. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	Zimmerman JK, Ehleringer JR (1990). Carbon isotope ratios are correlated with irradiance levels in the Panananian orchid Catasetum viridiflavum. Oecologia, 83, 247-249. DOI URL PMID

树种 Tree species	LSC (m)	Chl a (mg·g^-1)	Chl b (mg·g^-1)	Chl (a+b) (mg·g^-1)	Car (mg·g^-1)	Chl a/b	δ¹³C (‰)	LMA (g·m^-2)
银杏 Ginkgo biloba	0.5	2.37 ± 0.52	0.42 ± 0.08	2.79 ± 0.59	0.19 ± 0.06	5.68 ± 0.48	-26.61 ± 0.38	51.64 ± 3.06
	8.0	2.07 ± 0.41	0.34 ± 0.06	2.41 ± 0.46	0.20 ± 0.04	6.09 ± 0.60	-26.22 ± 0.17	64.84 ± 3.32
	Sig.	0.67	0.48	0.64	0.93	0.61	0.38	0.03
悬铃木 Platanus orientalis	0.5	2.94 ± 0.28	0.96 ± 0.08	3.89 ± 0.36	0.15 ± 0.03	3.06 ± 0.08	-28.45 ± 0.33^a	45.73 ± 6.69^a
	5.0	-	-	-	-	-	-27.73 ± 0.00^a	53.61 ± 0.00^a
	9.5	2.25 ± 0.40	0.77 ± 0.09	3.03 ± 0.49	0.11 ± 0.02	2.85 ± 0.17	-27.64 ± 0.60^a	84.21 ± 27.17^b
	Sig.	0.21	0.19	0.21	0.43	0.30	0.45	0.36
国槐 Sophora japonica	1	1.93 ± 0.00^a	1.10 ± 0.00^a	3.03 ± 0.00^a	0.18 ± 0.00^a	1.76 ± 0.00^a	-28.79 ± 0.00^a	52.31 ± 0.00^a
	10	1.12 ± 0.12^b	0.70 ± 0.07^ab	1.82 ± 0.19^ab	0.09 ± 0.03^ab	1.61 ± 0.09^a	-27.79 ± 0.32^a	62.68 ± 1.09^ab
	20	0.91 ± 0.28^b	0.59 ± 0.17^b	1.50 ± 0.44^b	0.06 ± 0.02^b	1.53 ± 0.09^a	-27.51 ± 0.54^a	74.40 ± 5.80^b
	Sig.	0.05	0.10	0.07	0.06	0.33	0.26	0.03
黄葛榕 Ficus lacor	1	2.10 ± 0.10^a	0.96 ± 0.04^ab	3.06 ± 0.14^a	0.81 ± 0.05^a	2.20 ± 0.02^a	-28.52 ± 0.33^a	74.26 ± 5.30^a
	7	2.21 ± 0.05^a	0.95 ± 0.05^a	3.16 ± 0.08^a	0.98 ± 0.10^a	2.33 ± 0.12^a	-27.97 ± 0.10^a	70.83 ± 1.28^a
	12	1.84 ± 0.29^a	0.68 ± 0.11^b	2.52 ± 0.41^a	0.72 ± 0.04^a	2.70 ± 0.02^b	-26.97 ± 0.08^b	81.86 ± 8.82^a
	Sig.	0.31	0.09	0.19	0.21	0.05	0.03	0.50
榕树 F. microcarpa	2	1.35 ± 0.64^ab	0.62 ± 0.04^a	1.97 ± 0.68^ab	0.59 ± 0.27^ab	2.12 ± 0.88^ab	-28.62 ± 0.20^a	71.56 ± 8.28^a
	10	2.08 ± 0.12^a	0.68 ± 0.05^a	2.76 ± 0.17^a	0.91 ± 0.07^a	3.05 ± 0.07^a	-28.78 ± 0.19^a	71.92 ± 0.85^a
	15	1.08 ± 0.14^b	0.77 ± 0.14^a	1.85 ± 0.18^b	0.39 ± 0.08^b	1.62 ± 0.44^b	-28.43 ± 0.27^a	86.98 ± 5.72^a
	Sig.	0.02	0.73	0.06	0.02	0.09	0.56	0.10

树种 Tree species	LSC (m)	Chl a (mg·g^-1)	Chl b (mg·g^-1)	Chl (a+b) (mg·g^-1)	Car (mg·g^-1)	Chl a/b	δ¹³C (‰)	LMA (g·m^-2)
银杏 Ginkgo biloba	0.5	2.37 ± 0.52	0.42 ± 0.08	2.79 ± 0.59	0.19 ± 0.06	5.68 ± 0.48	-26.61 ± 0.38	51.64 ± 3.06
	8.0	2.07 ± 0.41	0.34 ± 0.06	2.41 ± 0.46	0.20 ± 0.04	6.09 ± 0.60	-26.22 ± 0.17	64.84 ± 3.32
	Sig.	0.67	0.48	0.64	0.93	0.61	0.38	0.03
悬铃木 Platanus orientalis	0.5	2.94 ± 0.28	0.96 ± 0.08	3.89 ± 0.36	0.15 ± 0.03	3.06 ± 0.08	-28.45 ± 0.33^a	45.73 ± 6.69^a
	5.0	-	-	-	-	-	-27.73 ± 0.00^a	53.61 ± 0.00^a
	9.5	2.25 ± 0.40	0.77 ± 0.09	3.03 ± 0.49	0.11 ± 0.02	2.85 ± 0.17	-27.64 ± 0.60^a	84.21 ± 27.17^b
	Sig.	0.21	0.19	0.21	0.43	0.30	0.45	0.36
国槐 Sophora japonica	1	1.93 ± 0.00^a	1.10 ± 0.00^a	3.03 ± 0.00^a	0.18 ± 0.00^a	1.76 ± 0.00^a	-28.79 ± 0.00^a	52.31 ± 0.00^a
	10	1.12 ± 0.12^b	0.70 ± 0.07^ab	1.82 ± 0.19^ab	0.09 ± 0.03^ab	1.61 ± 0.09^a	-27.79 ± 0.32^a	62.68 ± 1.09^ab
	20	0.91 ± 0.28^b	0.59 ± 0.17^b	1.50 ± 0.44^b	0.06 ± 0.02^b	1.53 ± 0.09^a	-27.51 ± 0.54^a	74.40 ± 5.80^b
	Sig.	0.05	0.10	0.07	0.06	0.33	0.26	0.03
黄葛榕 Ficus lacor	1	2.10 ± 0.10^a	0.96 ± 0.04^ab	3.06 ± 0.14^a	0.81 ± 0.05^a	2.20 ± 0.02^a	-28.52 ± 0.33^a	74.26 ± 5.30^a
	7	2.21 ± 0.05^a	0.95 ± 0.05^a	3.16 ± 0.08^a	0.98 ± 0.10^a	2.33 ± 0.12^a	-27.97 ± 0.10^a	70.83 ± 1.28^a
	12	1.84 ± 0.29^a	0.68 ± 0.11^b	2.52 ± 0.41^a	0.72 ± 0.04^a	2.70 ± 0.02^b	-26.97 ± 0.08^b	81.86 ± 8.82^a
	Sig.	0.31	0.09	0.19	0.21	0.05	0.03	0.50
榕树 F. microcarpa	2	1.35 ± 0.64^ab	0.62 ± 0.04^a	1.97 ± 0.68^ab	0.59 ± 0.27^ab	2.12 ± 0.88^ab	-28.62 ± 0.20^a	71.56 ± 8.28^a
	10	2.08 ± 0.12^a	0.68 ± 0.05^a	2.76 ± 0.17^a	0.91 ± 0.07^a	3.05 ± 0.07^a	-28.78 ± 0.19^a	71.92 ± 0.85^a
	15	1.08 ± 0.14^b	0.77 ± 0.14^a	1.85 ± 0.18^b	0.39 ± 0.08^b	1.62 ± 0.44^b	-28.43 ± 0.27^a	86.98 ± 5.72^a
	Sig.	0.02	0.73	0.06	0.02	0.09	0.56	0.10

树种 Tree species	方位Orientation	Chl a (mg·g^-1)	Chl b (mg·g^-1)	Chl (a+b) (mg·g^-1)	Car (mg·g^-1)	Chl a/b	δ¹³C (‰)	LMA (g·m^-2)
银杏 Ginkgo biloba	E	2.99 ± 0.70^a	0.42 ± 0.12^a	3.41 ± 0.82^a	0.32 ± 0.05^a	7.31 ± 0.45^a	-26.53 ± 0.42^a	52.80 ± 10.10^a
	S	2.63 ± 0.43^ab	0.46 ± 0.05^a	3.09 ± 0.48^ab	0.21 ± 0.06^ab	5.69 ± 0.34^b	-25.69 ± 0.20^a	60.02 ± 3.88^a
	W	2.11 ± 0.32^ab	0.45 ± 0.09^a	2.56 ± 0.41^ab	0.16 ± 0.01^b	4.77 ± 0.20^b	-26.92 ± 0.24^a	63.39 ± 10.73^a
	N	1.15 ± 0.01^b	0.20 ± 0.00^a	1.35 ± 0.01^b	0.10 ± 0.01^b	5.77 ± 0.17^b	-26.52 ± 0.33^a	56.73 ± 1.69^a
	Sig.	0.14	0.20	0.15	0.07	0.02	0.17	0.79
悬铃木 Platanus orientalis	E	3.40 ± 0.13^a	1.07 ± 0.07^a	4.48 ± 0.20^a	0.20 ± 0.04^a	3.18 ± 0.07^a	-29.28 ± 0.25^a	42.19 ± 5.42^a
	S	2.60 ± 0.27^ab	0.84 ± 0.05^ab	3.44 ± 0.32^ab	0.11 ± 0.01^b	3.10 ± 0.15^a	-27.41 ± 1.01^a	103.48 ± 61.09^a
	W	1.77 ± 0.43^b	0.66 ± 0.10^b	2.43 ± 0.54^b	0.09 ± 0.01^b	2.66 ± 0.24^a	-27.33 ± 0.07^a	67.51 ± 2.03^a
	N	2.61 ± 0.53^ab	0.90 ± 0.15^ab	3.51 ± 0.68^ab	0.12 ± 0.00^ab	2.87 ± 0.12^a	-28.44 ± 0.03^a	46.71 ± 8.40^a
	Sig.	0.15	0.16	0.15	0.08	0.22	0.15	0.55
国槐 Sophora japonica	E	1.47 ± 0.00^a	0.85 ± 0.03^a	2.32 ± 0.03^a	0.14 ± 0.02^a	1.73 ± 0.06^a	-28.86 ± 0.21^a	65.92 ± 3.34^a
	S	0.92 ± 0.02^ab	0.64 ± 0.08^a	1.56 ± 0.10^ab	0.05 ± 0.01^b	1.46 ± 0.15^a	-26.92 ± 0.33^b	73.48 ± 7.79^a
	W	0.58 ± 0.42^b	0.35 ± 0.25^a	0.93 ± 0.67^b	0.04 ± 0.04^b	1.58 ± 0.10^a	-27.25 ± 0.15^b	73.44 ± 12.91^a
	N	1.10 ± 0.01^ab	0.73 ± 0.08^a	1.83 ± 0.09^ab	0.06 ± 0.01^ab	1.52 ± 0.15^a	-27.58 ± 0.31^b	61.31 ± 0.60^a
	Sig.	0.15	0.25	0.17	0.10	0.49	0.15	0.55
黄葛榕 Ficus lacor	E	2.13 ± 0.13^a	0.90 ± 0.02^a	3.03 ± 0.11^a	0.83 ± 0.06^a	2.37 ± 0.19^a	-29.40 ± 0.00^a	68.61 ± 0.00^a
	S	1.90 ± 0.21^a	0.79 ± 0.14^a	2.69 ± 0.35^a	0.85 ± 0.17^a	2.46 ± 0.16^a	-27.70 ± 0.34_b	80.78 ± 5.40^a
	W	2.30 ± 0.14^a	0.99 ± 0.11^a	3.30 ± 0.25^a	0.87 ± 0.07^a	2.36 ± 0.16^a	-27.94 ± 0.57^ab	70.52 ± 1.28^a
	N	1.91 ± 0.20^a	0.75 ± 0.18^a	2.66 ± 0.37^a	0.80 ± 0.06^a	2.65 ± 0.37^a	-29.24 ± 0.00^a	69.17 ± 0.00^a
	Sig.	0.36	0.56	0.43	0.97	0.78	0.07	0.12
榕树 F. microcarpa	E	1.65 ± 0.66^a	0.81 ± 0.00^a	2.46 ± 0.67^a	0.62 ± 0.43^a	2.03 ± 0.81^a	-28.98 ± 0.54^a	59.25 ± 11.64^a
	S	1.67 ± 0.07^a	0.52 ± 0.05^a	2.20 ± 0.12^a	0.68 ± 0.04^a	3.20 ± 0.15^a	-28.50 ± 0.44^a	95.58 ± 9.41^b
	W	1.62 ± 0.51^a	0.97 ± 0.30^a	2.59 ± 0.20^a	0.62 ± 0.29^a	2.04 ± 1.16^a	-29.04 ± 0.21^a	82.88 ± 8.64^ab
	N	1.54 ± 0.58^a	0.70 ± 0.01^a	2.24 ± 0.57^a	0.63 ± 0.32^a	2.23 ± 0.86^a	-29.10 ± 0.61^a	76.34 ± 5.86^a
	Sig.	1.00	0.34	0.91	1.00	0.73	0.80	0.18

树种 Tree species	方位Orientation	Chl a (mg·g^-1)	Chl b (mg·g^-1)	Chl (a+b) (mg·g^-1)	Car (mg·g^-1)	Chl a/b	δ¹³C (‰)	LMA (g·m^-2)
银杏 Ginkgo biloba	E	2.99 ± 0.70^a	0.42 ± 0.12^a	3.41 ± 0.82^a	0.32 ± 0.05^a	7.31 ± 0.45^a	-26.53 ± 0.42^a	52.80 ± 10.10^a
	S	2.63 ± 0.43^ab	0.46 ± 0.05^a	3.09 ± 0.48^ab	0.21 ± 0.06^ab	5.69 ± 0.34^b	-25.69 ± 0.20^a	60.02 ± 3.88^a
	W	2.11 ± 0.32^ab	0.45 ± 0.09^a	2.56 ± 0.41^ab	0.16 ± 0.01^b	4.77 ± 0.20^b	-26.92 ± 0.24^a	63.39 ± 10.73^a
	N	1.15 ± 0.01^b	0.20 ± 0.00^a	1.35 ± 0.01^b	0.10 ± 0.01^b	5.77 ± 0.17^b	-26.52 ± 0.33^a	56.73 ± 1.69^a
	Sig.	0.14	0.20	0.15	0.07	0.02	0.17	0.79
悬铃木 Platanus orientalis	E	3.40 ± 0.13^a	1.07 ± 0.07^a	4.48 ± 0.20^a	0.20 ± 0.04^a	3.18 ± 0.07^a	-29.28 ± 0.25^a	42.19 ± 5.42^a
	S	2.60 ± 0.27^ab	0.84 ± 0.05^ab	3.44 ± 0.32^ab	0.11 ± 0.01^b	3.10 ± 0.15^a	-27.41 ± 1.01^a	103.48 ± 61.09^a
	W	1.77 ± 0.43^b	0.66 ± 0.10^b	2.43 ± 0.54^b	0.09 ± 0.01^b	2.66 ± 0.24^a	-27.33 ± 0.07^a	67.51 ± 2.03^a
	N	2.61 ± 0.53^ab	0.90 ± 0.15^ab	3.51 ± 0.68^ab	0.12 ± 0.00^ab	2.87 ± 0.12^a	-28.44 ± 0.03^a	46.71 ± 8.40^a
	Sig.	0.15	0.16	0.15	0.08	0.22	0.15	0.55
国槐 Sophora japonica	E	1.47 ± 0.00^a	0.85 ± 0.03^a	2.32 ± 0.03^a	0.14 ± 0.02^a	1.73 ± 0.06^a	-28.86 ± 0.21^a	65.92 ± 3.34^a
	S	0.92 ± 0.02^ab	0.64 ± 0.08^a	1.56 ± 0.10^ab	0.05 ± 0.01^b	1.46 ± 0.15^a	-26.92 ± 0.33^b	73.48 ± 7.79^a
	W	0.58 ± 0.42^b	0.35 ± 0.25^a	0.93 ± 0.67^b	0.04 ± 0.04^b	1.58 ± 0.10^a	-27.25 ± 0.15^b	73.44 ± 12.91^a
	N	1.10 ± 0.01^ab	0.73 ± 0.08^a	1.83 ± 0.09^ab	0.06 ± 0.01^ab	1.52 ± 0.15^a	-27.58 ± 0.31^b	61.31 ± 0.60^a
	Sig.	0.15	0.25	0.17	0.10	0.49	0.15	0.55
黄葛榕 Ficus lacor	E	2.13 ± 0.13^a	0.90 ± 0.02^a	3.03 ± 0.11^a	0.83 ± 0.06^a	2.37 ± 0.19^a	-29.40 ± 0.00^a	68.61 ± 0.00^a
	S	1.90 ± 0.21^a	0.79 ± 0.14^a	2.69 ± 0.35^a	0.85 ± 0.17^a	2.46 ± 0.16^a	-27.70 ± 0.34_b	80.78 ± 5.40^a
	W	2.30 ± 0.14^a	0.99 ± 0.11^a	3.30 ± 0.25^a	0.87 ± 0.07^a	2.36 ± 0.16^a	-27.94 ± 0.57^ab	70.52 ± 1.28^a
	N	1.91 ± 0.20^a	0.75 ± 0.18^a	2.66 ± 0.37^a	0.80 ± 0.06^a	2.65 ± 0.37^a	-29.24 ± 0.00^a	69.17 ± 0.00^a
	Sig.	0.36	0.56	0.43	0.97	0.78	0.07	0.12
榕树 F. microcarpa	E	1.65 ± 0.66^a	0.81 ± 0.00^a	2.46 ± 0.67^a	0.62 ± 0.43^a	2.03 ± 0.81^a	-28.98 ± 0.54^a	59.25 ± 11.64^a
	S	1.67 ± 0.07^a	0.52 ± 0.05^a	2.20 ± 0.12^a	0.68 ± 0.04^a	3.20 ± 0.15^a	-28.50 ± 0.44^a	95.58 ± 9.41^b
	W	1.62 ± 0.51^a	0.97 ± 0.30^a	2.59 ± 0.20^a	0.62 ± 0.29^a	2.04 ± 1.16^a	-29.04 ± 0.21^a	82.88 ± 8.64^ab
	N	1.54 ± 0.58^a	0.70 ± 0.01^a	2.24 ± 0.57^a	0.63 ± 0.32^a	2.23 ± 0.86^a	-29.10 ± 0.61^a	76.34 ± 5.86^a
	Sig.	1.00	0.34	0.91	1.00	0.73	0.80	0.18

树种 Tree species		开度 LSC						方位 Orientation
树种 Tree species		LMA	Chl a	Chl b	Chl (a+b)	Car	Chl a/b		LMA	Chl a	Chl b	Chl (a+b)	Car	Chl a/b
榕树 Ficus microcarpa	r	-0.341	-0.449	-0.186	-0.456	-0.354	-0.392	0.254		-0.499	-0.321	-0.678	-0.505	-0.174
榕树 Ficus microcarpa	Sig.	0.336	0.193	0.608	0.186	0.315	0.263	0.543		0.208	0.439	0.065	0.202	0.680
黄葛榕 F. lacor	r	0.534	-0.500	-0.737	-0.608	-0.326	0.863*	0.671*		0.386	0.477	0.429	0.556	-0.425
黄葛榕 F. lacor	Sig.	0.275	0.313	0.095	0.201	0.528	0.027	0.034		0.271	0.164	0.216	0.095	0.221
国槐 Sophora japonica	r	0.604	-0.572	-0.543	-0.565	-0.45	-0.453	0.406		-0.707	-0.567	-0.662	-0.793*	-0.582
国槐 Sophora japonica	Sig.	0.064	0.084	0.105	0.089	0.192	0.189	0.318		0.050	0.142	0.074	0.019	0.130
悬铃木 Platanus orientalis	r	0.618	0.385	0.359	0.381	0.502	0.415	0.812*		-0.48	-0.539	-0.493	-0.607	-0.220
悬铃木 Platanus orientalis	Sig.	0.057	0.346	0.383	0.352	0.205	0.307	0.014		0.229	0.168	0.214	0.111	0.601
银杏 Ginkgo biloba	r	0.319	0.326	-0.002	0.285	0.609	0.614	0.319		0.283	0.203	0.276	0.156	0.055
银杏 Ginkgo biloba	Sig.	0.441	0.431	0.995	0.494	0.109	0.106	0.441		0.497	0.63	0.509	0.712	0.896

5种绿化树种叶片比叶重、光合色素含量和δ¹³C的开度与方位差异

Differences in leaf mass per area, photosynthetic pigments and δ¹³C by orientation and crown position in five greening tree species

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	任培鑫, 李鹏, 彭长辉, 周晓路, 杨铭霞. 洞庭湖流域植被光合物候的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 319-330.
[2]	师生波, 周党卫, 李天才, 德科加, 杲秀珍, 马家麟, 孙涛, 王方琳. 青藏高原高山嵩草光合功能对模拟夜间低温的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 361-373.
[3]	余玉蓉, 吴浩, 高娅菲, 赵媛博, 李小玲, 卜贵军, 薛丹, 刘正祥, 武海雯, 吴林. 模拟氮沉降对鄂西南湿地泥炭藓生理及形态特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1493-1506.
[4]	师生波, 师瑞, 周党卫, 张雯. 低温对高山嵩草叶片光化学和非光化学能量耗散特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1441-1452.
[5]	郑宁, 李素英, 王鑫厅, 吕世海, 赵鹏程, 臧琛, 许玉珑, 何静, 秦文昊, 高恒睿. 基于环境因子对叶绿素影响的典型草原植物生活型优势研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 951-960.
[6]	王晶苑, 魏杰, 温学发. 土壤CO₂通量梯度观测技术和方法的理论、假设与应用进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1523-1536.
[7]	薛金儒, 吕肖良. 黄土高原生态工程实施下基于日光诱导叶绿素荧光的植被恢复生产力效益评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(10): 1289-1304.
[8]	吴霖升, 张永光, 章钊颖, 张小康, 吴云飞. 日光诱导叶绿素荧光遥感及其在陆地生态系统监测中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(10): 1167-1199.
[9]	周稳, 迟永刚, 周蕾. 基于日光诱导叶绿素荧光的北半球森林物候研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 345-354.
[10]	丁键浠, 周蕾, 王永琳, 庄杰, 陈集景, 周稳, 赵宁, 宋珺, 迟永刚. 叶绿素荧光主动与被动联合观测应用前景[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(2): 105-118.
[11]	赵飞飞, 马煦, 邸楠, 王烨, 刘洋, 李广德, 贾黎明, 席本野. 毛白杨茎干不同方位夜间液流变化规律及其主要影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 864-874.
[12]	荀彦涵, 邸雪颖, 金光泽. 典型阔叶红松林主要树种叶性状的垂直变异及经济策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(7): 730-741.
[13]	郭庆华, 胡天宇, 马勤, 徐可心, 杨秋丽, 孙千惠, 李玉美, 苏艳军. 新一代遥感技术助力生态系统生态学研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(4): 418-435.
[14]	刘校铭, 杨晓芳, 王璇, 张守仁. 暖温带落叶阔叶林辽东栎和五角枫生长和光合生理生态特征对模拟氮沉降的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(3): 197-207.
[15]	高思涵, 葛珏希, 周李奕, 朱宝琳, 葛星宇, 李凯, 倪健. 测定森林树木叶面积的最适叶片数是多少?[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(9): 917-925.