植物生态学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 373-379.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0049
收稿日期:
2004-08-09
接受日期:
2005-01-05
出版日期:
2005-08-09
发布日期:
2005-05-30
通讯作者:
桑卫国
作者简介:
*E-mail: swg@ibeas.ac.cn基金资助:
SUN Xiao-Yu1, LU Zhao-Hua1, YU Xing-Jun2, SANG Wei-Guo2,*()
Received:
2004-08-09
Accepted:
2005-01-05
Online:
2005-08-09
Published:
2005-05-30
Contact:
SANG Wei-Guo
摘要:
外来入侵植物紫茎泽兰 (Eupatoriumadenophorum) 给我国西南地区的经济、社会和环境造成了严重的危害。为了阐明紫茎泽兰种群的年龄结构和未来发展趋势, 为今后的防治工作提供科学依据, 在攀枝花地区设置了 2 0个样地 (10m× 10m), 对 4种不同生境种群的年龄结构、静态生命表和时间序列预测进行了分析。这 4个种群是该地区有代表性类型中紫茎泽兰的种群 :路旁荒地、云南松 (Pinusyunnanensis) 林、阔叶林和阔叶林的林缘。种群年龄结构分析表明, 目前 (几个类型总和 ) 个体数量比重分别为 :幼年期占 92.32 %, 青年期占 6.4 0 %, 成熟期占 2.2 0 %, 衰老期占 0.18%, 个体数量主要集中于幼年期。紫茎泽兰不同种群生命表和存活曲线的分析显示, 紫茎泽兰对 4个种群的入侵过程是路旁荒地→阔叶林林缘→阔叶林→云南松林, 尽管所处的生境差异较大, 但基本属于DeeveyⅢ型, 一年生幼苗死亡率高达 97.30 %, 种群偏离典型曲线的程度与群落受干扰程度强弱有关, 一般由幼年期到青年期和由成熟期到衰老期死亡率较高 (分别为 93.0 7%和 92.0 0 % ) 。时间序列分析表明, 在未来的 3~ 5年中, 紫茎泽兰种群仍然是以青年期和成熟期个体占绝对优势。
孙晓玉, 陆兆华, 于兴军, 桑卫国. 紫茎泽兰种群年龄结构动态及对控制的指示意义. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(3): 373-379. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0049
SUN Xiao-Yu, LU Zhao-Hua, YU Xing-Jun, SANG Wei-Guo. AGE STRUCTURE DYNAMICS OF EUPATORIUM ADENOPHORUM POPULATIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTROL. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(3): 373-379. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0049
环境因子 Environmental factors | 路旁荒地 Roadside | 阔叶林 Broad-leaved forest | 阔叶林林缘 Margin of broad-leaved forest | 云南松林 Pinus yunnanensis forest |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 1 837 | 2 175 | 2 057 | 2 208 |
2 坡向Slope aspect | 北N | 西北NW | 北N | 西南NS |
3 坡度Graduate (°) | 9 | 25 | 17 | 33 |
4 坡位Slope position | 下Lower | 中Middle | 中下Mid-Lower | 上Upper |
5 乔木层盖度Coverage of tree layer (%) | - | 70 | 60 | 50 |
6 土壤厚度Soil thickness (cm) | 57 | 72 | 67 | 50 |
7 土壤pH值Soil pH | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.8 |
8 土壤水分含量Soil moisture content (%) | 47 | 58 | 50 | 35 |
9 种群平均密度Mean density (individual·10-2·m-2) | 5 133 | 863 | 2 864 | 5 108 |
10 样地数量No. of plots | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
表1 不同紫茎泽兰种群的环境因子
Table 1 The environmental factors of different Eupatorium adenophorum populations
环境因子 Environmental factors | 路旁荒地 Roadside | 阔叶林 Broad-leaved forest | 阔叶林林缘 Margin of broad-leaved forest | 云南松林 Pinus yunnanensis forest |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 1 837 | 2 175 | 2 057 | 2 208 |
2 坡向Slope aspect | 北N | 西北NW | 北N | 西南NS |
3 坡度Graduate (°) | 9 | 25 | 17 | 33 |
4 坡位Slope position | 下Lower | 中Middle | 中下Mid-Lower | 上Upper |
5 乔木层盖度Coverage of tree layer (%) | - | 70 | 60 | 50 |
6 土壤厚度Soil thickness (cm) | 57 | 72 | 67 | 50 |
7 土壤pH值Soil pH | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.8 |
8 土壤水分含量Soil moisture content (%) | 47 | 58 | 50 | 35 |
9 种群平均密度Mean density (individual·10-2·m-2) | 5 133 | 863 | 2 864 | 5 108 |
10 样地数量No. of plots | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
图1 各种群年龄结构 a. 各样地中一年生紫茎泽兰植株 b. 阔叶林紫茎泽兰种群 c. 阔叶林林缘紫茎泽兰种群 d. 云南松林紫茎泽兰种群 e. 路旁荒地紫茎泽兰种群 f. 各种群 (总和) Ⅰ. 阔叶林一年生紫茎泽兰苗个体总数 Ⅱ. 阔叶林林缘一年生紫茎泽兰个体总数 Ⅲ. 云南松林一年生紫茎泽兰个体总数 Ⅳ. 路旁荒地一年生紫茎泽兰个体总数
Fig.1 The age structure of different Eupatorium adenophorum populations a. One-year-old Eupatorium adenophorum plants of different populations b. The populations of E. adenophorum in broad-leaved forest c. The population of E. adenophorum at the margin of broad-leaved forest d. The population of E. adenophorum in Pinus yunnanensis forest e. The population of E. adenophorum in roadside field f. The total populations Ⅰ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum in broad-leaved forest Ⅱ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum at the margin of broad-leaved forest Ⅲ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum in Pinus yunnanensis forest Ⅳ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum in roadside field
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | 1 000 | 3.000 | 513 | 0.833 | 0.901 |
2 | 103 | 167.210 | 2.223 | 34 | 0.330 | 1.898 |
3 | 69 | 112.010 | 2.049 | 21 | 0.304 | 1.587 |
4 | 48 | 77.920 | 1.892 | 31 | 0.646 | 1.063 |
5 | 17 | 27.590 | 1.441 | 14 | 0.824 | 1.088 |
6 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | - | - | 2.833 |
7 | 4 | 6.490 | 0.812 | 1 | 0.250 | 1.250 |
8 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
表2 阔叶林中紫茎泽兰种群生命表
Table 2 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in broad-leaved forest
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | 1 000 | 3.000 | 513 | 0.833 | 0.901 |
2 | 103 | 167.210 | 2.223 | 34 | 0.330 | 1.898 |
3 | 69 | 112.010 | 2.049 | 21 | 0.304 | 1.587 |
4 | 48 | 77.920 | 1.892 | 31 | 0.646 | 1.063 |
5 | 17 | 27.590 | 1.441 | 14 | 0.824 | 1.088 |
6 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | - | - | 2.833 |
7 | 4 | 6.490 | 0.812 | 1 | 0.250 | 1.250 |
8 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 2 758 | 0.998 | 0.547 |
2 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | 0 | 0 | 21.170 |
3 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | - | - | 20.170 |
4 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | 0 | 0 | 5.119 |
5 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | - | - | 4.119 |
6 | 23 | 8.321 | 0.92 | - | - | 2.804 |
7 | 24 | 8.683 | 0.939 | 2 | 0.083 | 1.708 |
8 | 22 | 7.960 | 0.901 | 15 | 0.682 | 0.818 |
9 | 7 | 2.533 | 0.404 | 7 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
表3 阔叶林林缘紫茎泽兰种群生命表
Table 3 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in the margin of broad-leaved forest
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 2 758 | 0.998 | 0.547 |
2 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | 0 | 0 | 21.170 |
3 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | - | - | 20.170 |
4 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | 0 | 0 | 5.119 |
5 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | - | - | 4.119 |
6 | 23 | 8.321 | 0.92 | - | - | 2.804 |
7 | 24 | 8.683 | 0.939 | 2 | 0.083 | 1.708 |
8 | 22 | 7.960 | 0.901 | 15 | 0.682 | 0.818 |
9 | 7 | 2.533 | 0.404 | 7 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 706 | 0.981 | 0.565 |
2 | 90 | 18.766 | 1.273 | - | - | 2.967 |
3 | 99 | 20.642 | 1.315 | 32 | 0.323 | 1.742 |
4 | 67 | 13.970 | 1.145 | 27 | 0.403 | 1.336 |
5 | 40 | 8.340 | 0.921 | 29 | 0.725 | 0.900 |
6 | 11 | 2.294 | 0.361 | 6 | 0.546 | 0.955 |
7 | 5 | 1.043 | 0.018 | 5 | 1.000 | 438.000 |
表4 云南松林紫茎泽兰种群生命表
Table 4 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in Pinus yunnanensis forest
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 706 | 0.981 | 0.565 |
2 | 90 | 18.766 | 1.273 | - | - | 2.967 |
3 | 99 | 20.642 | 1.315 | 32 | 0.323 | 1.742 |
4 | 67 | 13.970 | 1.145 | 27 | 0.403 | 1.336 |
5 | 40 | 8.340 | 0.921 | 29 | 0.725 | 0.900 |
6 | 11 | 2.294 | 0.361 | 6 | 0.546 | 0.955 |
7 | 5 | 1.043 | 0.018 | 5 | 1.000 | 438.000 |
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 335 | 0.995 | 0.575 |
2 | 20 | 4.592 | 0.662 | - | - | 15.900 |
3 | 30 | 6.889 | 0.838 | - | - | 9.767 |
4 | 32 | 7.348 | 0.866 | - | - | 8.188 |
5 | 49 | 11.251 | 1.051 | 3 | 0.061 | 4.520 |
6 | 46 | 10.563 | 1.024 | 5 | 0.109 | 3.783 |
7 | 41 | 9.415 | 0.974 | - | - | 3.183 |
8 | 42 | 9.644 | 0.984 | 17 | 0.405 | 2.119 |
9 | 25 | 5.741 | 0.759 | 9 | 0.360 | 2.220 |
10 | 16 | 3.674 | 0.565 | 5 | 0.313 | 2.188 |
11 | 11 | 2.526 | 0.402 | 5 | 0.455 | 1.955 |
12 | 6 | 1.378 | 0.139 | 1 | 0.167 | 2.167 |
13 | 5 | 1.148 | 0.060 | 1 | 0.200 | 1.500 |
14 | 4 | 0.919 | -0.040 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.750 |
15 | 1 | 0.230 | -0.640 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
表5 路旁荒地紫茎泽兰种群生命表
Table 5 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in roadside field
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 335 | 0.995 | 0.575 |
2 | 20 | 4.592 | 0.662 | - | - | 15.900 |
3 | 30 | 6.889 | 0.838 | - | - | 9.767 |
4 | 32 | 7.348 | 0.866 | - | - | 8.188 |
5 | 49 | 11.251 | 1.051 | 3 | 0.061 | 4.520 |
6 | 46 | 10.563 | 1.024 | 5 | 0.109 | 3.783 |
7 | 41 | 9.415 | 0.974 | - | - | 3.183 |
8 | 42 | 9.644 | 0.984 | 17 | 0.405 | 2.119 |
9 | 25 | 5.741 | 0.759 | 9 | 0.360 | 2.220 |
10 | 16 | 3.674 | 0.565 | 5 | 0.313 | 2.188 |
11 | 11 | 2.526 | 0.402 | 5 | 0.455 | 1.955 |
12 | 6 | 1.378 | 0.139 | 1 | 0.167 | 2.167 |
13 | 5 | 1.148 | 0.060 | 1 | 0.200 | 1.500 |
14 | 4 | 0.919 | -0.040 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.750 |
15 | 1 | 0.230 | -0.640 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | ||
2 | 103 | ||
3 | 69 | 262.67 | |
4 | 48 | 73.33 | |
5 | 17 | 44.67 | 170.60 |
6 | 3 | 22.67 | 48.00 |
7 | 4 | 8.00 | 28.20 |
8 | 3 | 3.33 | 25.00 |
表6 阔叶林紫茎泽兰生命预测表
Table 6 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in broad-leaved forest
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | ||
2 | 103 | ||
3 | 69 | 262.67 | |
4 | 48 | 73.33 | |
5 | 17 | 44.67 | 170.60 |
6 | 3 | 22.67 | 48.00 |
7 | 4 | 8.00 | 28.20 |
8 | 3 | 3.33 | 25.00 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | ||
2 | 6 | ||
3 | 6 | 925.33 | |
4 | 21 | 11.00 | |
5 | 21 | 16.00 | 563.60 |
6 | 23 | 21.67 | 15.40 |
7 | 24 | 22.67 | 19.00 |
8 | 22 | 23.00 | 22.20 |
9 | 7 | 17.67 | 19.40 |
表7 阔叶林林缘紫茎泽兰生命预测表
Table 7 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in the margin of broad-leaved forest
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | ||
2 | 6 | ||
3 | 6 | 925.33 | |
4 | 21 | 11.00 | |
5 | 21 | 16.00 | 563.60 |
6 | 23 | 21.67 | 15.40 |
7 | 24 | 22.67 | 19.00 |
8 | 22 | 23.00 | 22.20 |
9 | 7 | 17.67 | 19.40 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | ||
2 | 90 | ||
3 | 99 | 1 661.67 | |
4 | 67 | 85.33 | |
5 | 40 | 68.67 | 1 018.40 |
6 | 11 | 39.33 | 61.40 |
7 | 5 | 18.67 | 44.40 |
表8 云南松林紫茎泽兰生命预测表
Table 8 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in Pinus yunnanensis forest
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | ||
2 | 90 | ||
3 | 99 | 1 661.67 | |
4 | 67 | 85.33 | |
5 | 40 | 68.67 | 1 018.40 |
6 | 11 | 39.33 | 61.40 |
7 | 5 | 18.67 | 44.40 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | ||
2 | 20 | ||
3 | 30 | 1 468.33 | |
4 | 32 | 27.33 | |
5 | 49 | 37.00 | 897.20 |
6 | 46 | 42.33 | 35.40 |
7 | 41 | 45.33 | 39.60 |
8 | 42 | 43.00 | 42.00 |
9 | 25 | 36.00 | 40.60 |
10 | 16 | 27.67 | 34.00 |
11 | 11 | 17.33 | 27.00 |
12 | 6 | 11.00 | 20.00 |
13 | 5 | 7.33 | 12.60 |
14 | 4 | 5.00 | 8.40 |
15 | 1 | 3.33 | 5.40 |
表9 路旁荒地紫茎泽兰生命预测表
Table 9 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in roadside field
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | ||
2 | 20 | ||
3 | 30 | 1 468.33 | |
4 | 32 | 27.33 | |
5 | 49 | 37.00 | 897.20 |
6 | 46 | 42.33 | 35.40 |
7 | 41 | 45.33 | 39.60 |
8 | 42 | 43.00 | 42.00 |
9 | 25 | 36.00 | 40.60 |
10 | 16 | 27.67 | 34.00 |
11 | 11 | 17.33 | 27.00 |
12 | 6 | 11.00 | 20.00 |
13 | 5 | 7.33 | 12.60 |
14 | 4 | 5.00 | 8.40 |
15 | 1 | 3.33 | 5.40 |
[1] | Elton CS (1958). TheEcologyofInvasionsbyAnimalsandPlants.Methuen, London, 181. |
[2] | Li B (李博), Yang C (杨持), Lin P (林鹏) (1999). Ecology (生态学). HigherEducationPress, Beijing, 43.(inChinese). |
[3] | Li ZY (李振宇), Xie Y (解焱) (2002). InvasiveAlienSpeciesinChina (中国外来入侵种).ChinaForestryPublishingHouse, Beijing,163. (inChinese). |
[4] | Liu LH (刘伦辉), Liu WY (刘文耀), Zheng Z (郑征), Jing GF (荆桂芬) (1989). ThecharacteristicresearchofautecologyecologyofPamakani (Eupatoriumadenophorum). ActaEcologi calSinica (生态学报), 5,1-6. (inChinesewithEnglishab stract). |
[5] | Lodge DM (1993a). Biologicalinvasions:lessonsforecology. TrendsinEcology&Evolution, 8,133-137. |
[6] | Lodge DM (1993b). Speciesinvasionsanddeletions:communityeffectsandresponsestoclimateandhabitatchange.In:KarievaPM, KingsolverJG, HueyRBeds. BioticInteractionsandGlobalChange.SinauerAssociates, Sumderland, MA,367-387. |
[7] | Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000). InvasiveSpeciesinaChangingWorld. IslandPublishingHouse, Washington, DC, 457. |
[8] | Oelrichs PB, Seawright AA, MacLeod JJK, Ng JC (1998). ToxicPlantsandOtherNaturalToxicants. CABInternational, Walling ford, UK, 271. |
[9] | ParkerI M, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M (1999). Impact:towardaframeworkforunderstandingtheeco logicaleffectsofinvaders. BiologicalInvasions, 1,3-19. |
[10] | Patrabansh S, Madan M (1997). Studiesoncultivation, biologicalefficiencyandchemicalanalysisofPleurotussajor-caju (FR). SINGERondifferentbio-wastes.ActaBiotechnologica, 17,107-122. |
[11] |
Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J (2000). Globalspreadofmicroorganismsbyships. Nature, 408,49-50.
DOI URL |
[12] | Simberloff D (1996). ImpactsofintroducedspeciesintheUnitedStates. Consequences, 2,13-222. |
[13] | Stein B, Kutner LS, Adams JS (2000). PreciousHeritage:theSta tusofBiodiversityintheUnitedStates. OxfordUniversityPress, London, 300. |
[14] | Vitousek PM, Antonio CMD, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996). Biologicalinvasionsasglobalenvironmentalchange. AmericanScientist, 84,468-478. |
[15] | Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989). BiologicalinvasionbyMyricafayainHawaii:plantdemography, nitrogenfixation, ecosystemeffects. EcologicalMonographs, 59,247-265. |
[16] | Williamson M (1996). BiologicalInvasions.Chapman&Hall, NewYork, 244. |
[17] |
Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998). QuantifyingthreatstoimperiledspeciesintheUnitedStates. BioScience, 48,607-615.
DOI URL |
[18] | Zhang WH (张文辉) (1998). StudyonthePopulationEcologyofAdenophorapotanini (裂叶沙参种群生态学研究). ThePublishingHouseofNortheastForestryUniversity, Harbin. (inChi nese). |
[1] | 王燕玲, 招礼军, 朱栗琼, 莫若果, 林婷, 赵小雨. 广西天然红鳞蒲桃种群幼苗数量特征及动态分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1278-1286. |
[2] | 管岳, 王妍欣, 褚佳瑶, 冯琳骄, 宋晓萌, 周龙. 新疆野扁桃种群年龄结构及动态分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 967-977. |
[3] | 白雪, 李玉靖, 景秀清, 赵晓东, 畅莎莎, 荆韬羽, 刘晋汝, 赵鹏宇. 谷子及其根际土壤微生物群落对铬胁迫的响应机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 418-433. |
[4] | 何春梅, 李雨姗, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 郝占庆. 秦岭皇冠暖温性落叶阔叶林优势树种的径级结构和数量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1658-1667. |
[5] | 林春惠, 顾惠怡, 叶钦良, 张志坚, 钟智明, 易绮斐. 珍稀濒危植物大苞山茶种群结构与动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1684-1692. |
[6] | 张金峰, 葛树森, 梁金花, 李俊清. 长白山阔叶红松林红松种群年龄结构与数量动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 667-677. |
[7] | 蔚亮, 李均力, 包安明, 白洁, 黄粤, 刘铁, 沈占锋. 塔里木河下游湿地面积时序变化及对生态输水的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 616-627. |
[8] | 魏雪莹, 叶育石, 林喜珀, 崔煜文, 曾飞燕, 王发国. 极小种群植物猪血木的种群现状及保护对策[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1236-1246. |
[9] | 陈雅涵, 谢宗强. 样品保存条件对土壤与植物全碳全氮含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(6): 632-638. |
[10] | 胡朝臣, 刘学炎, 类延宝, 谭运洪, 张鹏, 董玉平, 刘丛强. 西双版纳外来入侵植物及其共存种叶片氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(11): 1145-1153. |
[11] | 王立龙, 王亮, 张丽芳, 刘玉洋, 徐世健. 不同生境下濒危植物裸果木种群结构及动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10): 980-989. |
[12] | 张亮, 王孝安, 刘鹏, 王贤, 邓美皎, 朱云云. 陕西子午岭北桑寄生的种群生命表与生存分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 687-693. |
[13] | 苏嫄, 焦菊英, 王志杰. 陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区坡沟立地环境下幼苗的存活特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 694-709. |
[14] | 李奎, 郑宝强, 王雁, 卜文圣. 滇牡丹自然种群数量动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(6): 522-529. |
[15] | 王硕, 高贤明, 王瑾芳, 党伟光. 紫茎泽兰土壤种子库特征及其对幼苗的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(2): 380-386. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19