长白山红松针阔混交林与开垦农田土壤呼吸作用比较

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0112

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用静态箱式法测定长白山红松(Pinus koraiensis)针阔混交林及其开垦农田的土壤呼吸作用。结果表明,两者土壤呼吸作用的日动态和季节动态均主要受温度影响,农田土壤呼吸作用的日变化极值出现时间较林地提前,最大值出现在12∶00左右,比林地提前6 h左右,最小值在凌晨5∶00左右,早于林地2~3 h;在生长季,土壤呼吸速率与10 cm土壤含水量关系不显著,而与土壤5 cm温度呈显著的指数关系;农田土壤温度高于林地,但在整个生长季(5~9月)林地土壤释放CO₂量(2 674.4 g·m^-2)约为农田(1 285.3 g·m^-2)的2倍;观测期间,农田土壤呼吸速率占林地的比例范围在23.4%~76.3%之间,说明土壤呼吸作用还受不同土地利用方式下植被类型等的影响。农田和红松针阔混交林土壤呼吸作用的Q₁₀值分别为3.07和2.92,农田土壤呼吸作用的Q₁₀ 值估计可能偏大。森林转变为农田后,环境、生物因子以及土壤养分含量和物理性质发生改变,共同影响土壤呼吸作用的强度和动态特征。

关键词: 红松针阔混交林, 开垦农田, 土壤呼吸作用, 土地利用

Abstract:

Background and Aims Soil respiration is a major flux in the global carbon cycle. A small change in soil respiration may result in a large increase of atmospheric CO₂. Land conversion has the greatest impact on the terrestrial ecosystems among the components of global change, but the effects on soil respiration are inadequately understood. Our objective was to examine the response of soil respiration to conversion from forests to agricultural lands, using broad-leaved Korean pine forest and reclaimed cropland in the Changbai Mountains.

Methods We used an Infra-red Gas Analyser (IGA) linked to a 50 cm×50 cm×15 cm chamber without a bottom. Three 50 cm×50 cm steel frames were inserted to a soil depth of 3-5 cm in randomly selected plots one day prior to measurement. When measuring, the chamber was put on the steel frame to make a closed container capturing CO₂ from the soil surface and piping the gas of chamber through the IGA. We repeated measurements every 15 days during the growing seasons from 2003 to 2005.

Key Results Diurnal and seasonal variations of soil respiration were mainly affected by soil temperatures. Soil respiration rate reached a maximum around noon in cropland plots, about six hours earlier than that in forest plots. Minimum rates occurred at 5∶00 am in cropland plots and 7∶00-8∶00 am in forest plots. Diurnal variations were driven mostly by temperature. During the growing season, soil respiration had a statistically significant exponential relationship with soil temperatures at 5 cm depth, but was weakly correlated with soil volumetric water contents at 10 cm depth. Although soil temperatures in cropland plots were higher than those in forest plots, soil CO₂ efflux in forest was about twice that in cropland during the growing season (May to September). During the period of measurement, soil respiration rate of cropland ranged from 23.4% to 76.3% that of forest. Therefore, vegetation types were another factor affecting soil respiration due to the change of land-use. Q₁₀ values of soil respiration averaged 2.92 for forest plots and 3.07 for cropland plots, which may be overestimated.

Conclusions Differences in soil respiration rates and patterns between forests and croplands result from changes in abiotic and biotic factors, including soil physicochemical properties, due to land-use change.

Key words: Broad-leaved Korean pine forest, Cropland, Soil respiration, Land-use change

王旭, 周广胜, 蒋延玲, 李峰. 长白山红松针阔混交林与开垦农田土壤呼吸作用比较. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(6): 887-893. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0112

WANG Xu, ZHOU Guang-Sheng, JIANG Yan-Ling, LI Feng. COMPARISON OF SOIL RESPIRATION IN BROAD-LEAVED KOREAN PINE FOREST AND RECLAIMED CROPLAND IN CHANGBAI MOUNTAINS, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(6): 887-893. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0112

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0112

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2006/V30/I6/887

图/表 7

表1 各样地土壤理化性质

Table 1 Soil physicochemical characteristics of experimental plots

土地类型 Land type		有机碳 Organic C (mg·g^-1)		全氮 Total N (mg·g^-1)		碳氮比 C∶N ratio	容重 Bulk density (g·m^-3)		总孔隙度 Total porosity (%)		pH值 pH value
红松针阔混交林 Korean pine forest		125.6		10.6		11.9	0.64		75.9		4.9
开垦农田 Cropland		27.9		2.9		9.6	1.10		58.4		5.7

图1 红松针阔混交林和农田土壤呼吸(a)、土壤温度(b)和土壤含水量日变化(c)

Fig.1 Diurnal variations of soil respiration (a), soil temperature (b), soil water content (c) in broad-leaved Korean pine forest plot and cropland plot

表2 红松针阔混交林和农田土壤呼吸作用速率与土壤温度的相关系数

Table 2 Correlative coefficients between soil respiration and soil temperature in Korean pine forest plot and cropland plot

土地利用类型 Land-use type	T_a	T₀	T₅	T₁₀	T₁₅	T₂₀
红松针阔混交林 Korean pine forest	0.424	0.585	0.937^*	0.819	0.525	0.230
农田(玉米) Cropland (Maize)	0.858	0.872	0.957^*	0.685	0.315	0.057

图2 红松针阔混交林和农田土壤呼吸季节动态比较

Fig.2 Seasonal variations of soil respiration between broad-leaved Korean pine forest plot and cropland plot

表3 红松针阔混交林和农田土壤呼吸速率方差分析

Table 3 ANOVA analyses of soil respiration between broad-leaved Korea pine forest plot and cropland plot

差异源 Source of variance	平方和 Sum of squares	自由度 Degree of freedom	方差 Mean square	F值 F value	p值 p value
组间 Intergroup	18.090	1	18.090	5.384	0.031
组内 Innergroup	67.198	20	3.360
总计 Total	85.288	21

图3 土壤呼吸速率和土壤5 cm温度的关系

Fig.3 Relationship between soil respiration and soil temperature at 5 cm depth in broad-leaved Korea pine forest plot and cropland plot

图4 土壤呼吸与10 cm土壤水分体积含量的关系

Fig.4 Relationship between soil respiration and soil water volumetric content at 10 cm depth in broad-leaved Korea pine forest plot and cropland plot

参考文献 29

[1]	Chen SY(陈述悦), Li J(李俊), Lu PL(陆佩玲), Wang YH(王迎红), Yu Q(于强) (2004). Soil respiration characteristics in winter wheat field in North China Plain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 15,1552-1560. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Chi ZW(迟振文), Zhang FS(张凤山), Li XY(李晓晏) (1981). The primary study on water-heat conditions of forest ecosystem on northern slope of Changbai Mountain. Research of Forest Ecosystem(森林生态系统研究), 2,167-178. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	Curiel-Yuste J, Janssens IA, Carrara A, Ceulemans R (2004). Annual Q₁₀ of soil respiration reflects plant phenological patterns as well as temperature sensitivity. Global Change Biology, 10,161-169.
[4]	Davidson EA, Ackerman IL (1993). Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils. Biogeochemistry, 20,161-193.
[5]	Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998). Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology, 4,217-227.
[6]	Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994). Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263,185-190. URL PMID
[7]	Domanski G, Kuzyakov Y, Siniakina S (2001). Carbon flows in the rhizosphere of ryegrass (Loliumperenne). Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 164,381-387.
[8]	Ewel KC, Cropper JWP, Gholz HL (1987). Soil CO₂ evolution in Florida slash pine plantations.Ⅰ. Changes through time. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17,325-329.
[9]	Huang CC(黄承才), Ge Y(葛滢), Chang J(常杰), Lu R(卢蓉), Xu QS(徐青山) (1999). Studies on the soil respiration of three woody plant communities in the east mid-subtropical zone, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19,324-328. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Jia JS(贾金生), Li J(李俊), Zhang YQ(张永强) (2003). Study on CO₂ emission from soil of typical farmland in North China Plain. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture(中国生态农业学报), (3),1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Jiang GM(蒋高明), Huang YX(黄银晓) (1997). A study on the measurement of CO₂ emission from the soil of the simulated Quercus liaotungensis forest sampled from Beijing mountain areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 17,477-482. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Lal R (2005). Forest soils and carbon sequestration. Forest Ecology and Management, 220,242-258.
[13]	Li LH(李凌浩), Chen ZZ(陈佐忠) (1998). Soil respiration in grassland communities in the world. Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 17(4),45-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Lloyd J, Taylor JA (1994). On the temperature-dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology, 8,315-323.
[15]	Murty D, Kirschbaum MF, Mcmurtrie RE, Mcgilvray H (2002). Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? A review of the literature. Global Change Biology, 8,105-123.
[16]	Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992). The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 44,81-99.
[17]	Raich JW, Tufekcioglu A (2000). Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry, 48,71-90.
[18]	Rochette P, Ellert B, Gregorich EG, Desjardins RL, Pattey E, Lessard R, Johnson BG (1997). Description of a dynamic closed chamber for measuring soil respiration and its comparison with other techniques. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 77,195-203.
[19]	Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA (2000). Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry, 48,7-20.
[20]	Tang J, Baldocchi DD, Xu L (2005). Tree photosynthesis modulates soil respiration on a diurnal time scale. Global Change Biology, 11,1298-1304. DOI URL PMID
[21]	Wang LG(王立刚), Qiu JJ(邱建军), Li WJ(李维炯) (2002). Study on the dynamics of soil respiration in the field of summer-corn in Huanghuaihai region in China. Soils and Fertilizers(土壤肥料), (6),13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Wang QC(王庆成), Liu KC(刘开昌), Zhang XQ(张秀清), Wang CY(王春英) (2001). Canopy photosynthesis of maize. Journal of Maize Sciences(玉米科学), 9,57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Wang Z(王战), Xu ZB(徐振邦), Li X(李昕), Peng YS(彭永山), Qian JJ(钱家驹), Liu ZD(刘子德), Yang Y(杨野), Wei CL(魏成录), Li YZ(李延增) (1980). The main forest types and their features of community stracture in northern slope of Changbai Mountain. Research of Forest Ecosystem(森林生态系统研究), 1,25-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Wu JG(吴建国), Zhang XQ(张小全), Xu DY(徐德应) (2003). The temporal variations of soil respiration under different land use in Liupan Mountain forest zone. Environmental Science(环境科学), 24(6),23-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	Xu ZB(徐振邦), Li X(李昕), Dai HC(戴洪才), Tan ZX(谭征祥), Zhang YP(章依平), Guo XF(郭杏芬), Peng YS(彭永山), Dai LM(代力民) (1985). Study on biomass of the broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain. Research of Forest Ecosystem(森林生态系统研究), 5,33-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Yang LF(杨兰芳), Cai ZC(蔡祖聪) (2005). Soil respiration during growth period affected by N application rates. Acta Pedologica Sinica(土壤学报), 42,9-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	Yang YS(杨玉盛), Chen GS(陈光水), Wang XG(王小国), Xie JS(谢锦升), Gao R(高人), Li Z(李震), Jin Z(金钊) (2005). Response of soil CO₂ efflux to forest conversion in subutropical zone of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 25,1684-1690. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	Yi ZG(易志刚), Yi WM(蚁伟民), Zhou GY(周国逸), Zhou LX(周丽霞), Zhang DQ(张德强), Ding MM(丁明懋) (2003). Soil carbon effluxes of three major vegetation type in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 23,1673-1678. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	Zhou GS(周广胜), Wang YH(王玉辉), Jiang YL(蒋延玲), Yang LM(杨利民) (2002). Conversion of terrestrial ecosystems and carbon cycling. Acta Photoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 26,250-254. (in Chinese with English abstract)