半干旱黄土丘陵区垄沟集雨对紫花苜蓿人工草地土壤水分和产草量的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2007.0058

植物生态学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 470-475.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0058

半干旱黄土丘陵区垄沟集雨对紫花苜蓿人工草地土壤水分和产草量的影响

贾宇¹, 徐炳成¹^,², 王晓凌¹^,³, 孙国均¹, 徐进章¹, 李凤民¹^,²^,^*()

1 兰州大学生命科学学院干旱与草地生态教育部重点实验室,兰州 730000
2 中国科学院-水利部水土保持研究所土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,陕西杨凌 712100
3 河南科技大学农学院,河南洛阳 471003

收稿日期:2005-10-09 接受日期:2006-01-23 出版日期:2007-10-09 发布日期:2007-05-30
通讯作者: 李凤民
作者简介:* E-mail: fmli@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
教育部科技创新工程重大项目培育资金项目;中国科学院百人计划项目和李嘉诚基金会西部项目

EFFECT OF RIDGE AND FURROW MICRO-CATCHMENT ON SOIL WATER IN SEEDED MEDICAGO SATIVA GRASSLAND IN THE SEMIARID LOESS HILL AND GULLY REGION OF NORTHWESTERN CHINA

JIA Yu¹, XU Bing-Cheng¹^,², WANG Xiao-Ling¹^,³, SUN Guo-Jun¹, XU Jin-Zhang¹, LI Feng-Min¹^,²^,^*()

¹Key Laboratory of Arid and Grassland Ecology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
²State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
³Agronomy College, Henan University of Sciences and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471003, China

Received:2005-10-09 Accepted:2006-01-23 Online:2007-10-09 Published:2007-05-30
Contact: LI Feng-Min

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究了黄土丘陵区垄沟集雨技术对紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)人工草地生产力以及土壤水分的影响。垄和沟的宽度均为30或60 cm,且垄上覆膜的处理水分利用效率分别比平作对照显著提高了13%和41%。垄和沟的宽度均为30 cm且垄上覆膜的处理4年的干草产量和平作对照无显著差异,而垄和沟的宽度均为60 cm,且垄上覆膜的处理干草产量比平作对照显著提高了41%,并且使紫花苜蓿草地产草高峰期提早了1~2年。垄和沟的宽度均为30或60 cm,且垄面裸露的两个处理产草量比平作对照有不同程度的降低。紫花苜蓿草地生长的第三年,深度为150 cm左右的土层是降水补充和水分消耗的平衡点。所有处理在紫花苜蓿生长4年后,200~500 cm 深度的土壤水分已经接近萎蔫系数。

关键词: 黄土丘陵区, 集雨技术, 紫花苜蓿, 土壤水分

Abstract:

Aims The semiarid loess hill and gully region of northwestern China is a pasture and agriculture transitional zone lacking water resources for irrigation. The agroecosystem in this region is very vulnerable. An effective method to improve the ecosystem is to combine agriculture with animal husbandry, in which productive grassland plays a key role. However, water is the main limitation on grassland production in this region. We studied the effect of alternating ridges and furrows (for harvesting rainfall) on alfalfa (Medicago sativa) forage yield and soil water.
Methods Five treatments were compared: 1) conventional cultivation in a flat plot without mulch (CK), 2) plastic mulched ridges with 30 cm wide ridges and furrows (M30), 3) plastic mulched ridges with 60 cm wide ridges and furrows (M60), 4) bare ridges with 30 cm wide ridges and furrows (B30), and 5) bare ridges with 60 cm wide ridges and furrows (B60). We measured soil water consumption, forage yield of alfalfa and soil water profile in all treatments.
Important findings The water use efficiency of M30 and M60 treatments was greater than that of CK by 13% and 41%, respectively. The total forage yield of alfalfa of M30 in four years was not significantly different from that of CK, but the total forage yield of M60 was significantly higher than that of CK by 41%. In both bare treatments, the total forage yield of alfalfa was lower than in CK. In the 3rd alfalfa growing season, the 150 cm soil layer was the balance point of water supplement and soil water consumption. Below 150 cm, soil water can not be supplied by rainfall. Water at 200-500 cm soil depth was close to the permanent wilting point after four years. This study indicates that the M60 treatment is the optimum model for alfalfa establishment in this region. However, after the alfalfa phase, the shallow-root crop must be planted to restore soil water content for subsequent conventional crops.

Key words: loess hill and gully region, rainwater-harvesting technology, Medicago sativa, soil water

贾宇, 徐炳成, 王晓凌, 孙国均, 徐进章, 李凤民. 半干旱黄土丘陵区垄沟集雨对紫花苜蓿人工草地土壤水分和产草量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 470-475. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0058

JIA Yu, XU Bing-Cheng, WANG Xiao-Ling, SUN Guo-Jun, XU Jin-Zhang, LI Feng-Min. EFFECT OF RIDGE AND FURROW MICRO-CATCHMENT ON SOIL WATER IN SEEDED MEDICAGO SATIVA GRASSLAND IN THE SEMIARID LOESS HILL AND GULLY REGION OF NORTHWESTERN CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 470-475. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0058

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0058

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2007/V31/I3/470

图/表 6

图1 2001~2004年试验地点降雨旬(每10日)分布情况

Fig.1 Distribution of rainfall every ten days during the Medicago sativa growing seasons in 2001-2004 at the experimental site

表1 2001~2004年不同生长季各处理的紫花苜蓿干草产量 (kg·hm-2)

Table 1 Forage yield of Medicago sativa (kg·hm-2) in the various treatments in 2001-2004

处理 Treatments	2001	2002	2003	2004	2001~2004
CK	624.11^bc	3 389.8^bc	4 541.2^bc	4 657.1^b	13 212.1^bc
M30	744.59^ab	3 824.3^ab	4 897.4^b	4 855.2^b	14 321.5^b
M60	763.78^a	4 608.9^a	6 631.2^a	6 615.1^a	18 619.0^a
B30	535.00^c	3 027.5^bc	3 779.9^bc	3 180.7^c	10 523.2^c
B60	547.11^c	2 512.3^c	3 074.7^c	3 370.1^c	9 504.2^d

表2 2001~2004年各处理土壤水分消耗量(mm)

Table 2 Soil water consumption (mm) in the treatments in 2001-2004

处理 Treatments	0~200 cm			0~500 cm
处理 Treatments	2001	2002		2003	2004	2001~2004
CK	-10.8^a		97.7^a	80.1^b	61.1^a	274.9^a
M30	8.9^a		79.2^a	122.6^a	62.0^a	223.0^b
M60	-10.3^a		83.4^a	112.4^a	65.2^a	271.9^a
B30	5.9^a		91.4^a	96.1^b	55.7^b	224.6^b
B60	-11.2^a		88.6^a	70.5^b	64.1^a	224.9^b

表3 2001~2004年各处理的水分利用效率 (kg·hm-2·mm-1)

Table 3 Water use efficiency (kg·hm-2·mm-1) in various treatments in 2001-2004

处理 Treatments	0~200 cm			0~500 cm
处理 Treatments	2001	2002		2003	2004	2001~2004
CK	2.89^abc		8.06^bc	12.16^b	21.99^b	9.61^c
M30	3.18^ab		9.51^ab	11.79^b	22.83^b	10.83^b
M60	3.58^a		11.33^a	16.95^a	30.64^a	13.57^a
B30	2.31^c		7.26^bc	9.80^b	15.41^c	7.95^d
B60	2.54^bc		6.11^c	8.41^b	15.69^c	7.17^d

图2 播种前、2003年10月和2004年10月收获时土壤剖面 (500 cm 土层以上) 含水量情况

Fig.2 Profile soil moisture in the upper 500-cm layer at increments of 20 cm in various treatments in April 2001, Oct. 2003 and Oct. 2004 A:播种前和2003年土壤剖面水分含量 The profile soil moisture in 2003 and before sowing B:2004年土壤剖面水分含量 The profile soil moisture in 2004 SMBS:为播种前的土壤含水量 Soil moisture before sowing PWC:永久萎蔫点 Permanent wilting coefficient (6.2%) FWHC:田间持水量 (22.9%) Field water holding capacity (maximum capillary held water, 22.9%) 误差线表示在p=0.05水平的LSD值 Error bars are the LSD at p=0.05

图3 土壤水分补给和消耗示意图

Fig.3 The sketch map of soil water supplement and consumption A. 土壤水分补给量 Soil water supplement B. 土壤水分消耗量 Soil water consumption

参考文献 18

[1]	Bai WM (白文明) (2002). Effect of irrigation methods and quota on morphological characteristics of alfalfa in Wulanbuhe sandy region. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22, 1247-1253. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Bauder JW, Bauder A, Ramirez JM, Cassel DK (1987). Alfalfa water use and production on dryland and irrigated sandy loam. Agronomy Journal, 70, 95-99.
[3]	Blad BL, Rosenberg NJ (1976). Evaluation of resistance and mass transport evapotranspiration models requiring canopy temperature data. Agronomy Journal, 68, 764-769.
[4]	Boers TM, Ben-Asher J (1982). A review of rainwater harvesting. Agricultural Water Management, 5, 145-158.
[5]	Chen HS (陈洪松), Shao MA (邵明安), Zhang XC (张兴昌) (2003). Effect of soil water and fertilizer on soybean yield on loess slopeland. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 14, 211-214. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Cheng JM (程积民), Wan HE(万惠娥) (2002). Vegetation Construction and Soil and Water Conservation in the Loess Plateau of China (中国黄土高原植被建设与水土保持). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[7]	Cheng JM (程积民), Wan HE (万惠娥), Wang J (王静) (2005). Alfalfa growth and its relation with soil water status in loess hilly and gully region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 16, 435-438. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Krogman KK, Hobbs EH (1965). Evapotranspiration of irrigated alfalfa as related to season and growth stage. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 45, 310-313.
[9]	Li FM (李凤民) (2000). Eco-farming mixed planting with animal husbandry based on rainwater-harvesting technology in semi-arid Loess Plateau. Ecological Agriculture Research (生态农业研究), 8(4), 21-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Li YS (李玉山) (1989). The Relationship and Regulation of Water Between Soil and Crops (土壤-作物水分关系和调节). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[11]	Li YS (李玉山) (2002). Productivity dynamic of alfalfa and its effects on water eco-environment. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 39, 404-411. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Li XY, Gong JD, Gao QD, Li FR (2001). Incorporation of ridge and furrow method of rainfall harvesting with mulching for crop production under semiarid conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 50, 173-183.
[13]	Ottman MJ, Tickes BR, Roth RL (1996). Alfalfa yield and stand response to termination in an arid environment. Agronomy Journal, 88, 44-48.
[14]	Reiz C, Maulder P, Begemann L (1988). Water Harvesting for Plant Production. World Bank, Washington.
[15]	Tian Y, Su DR, Li FM, Li XY (2003). Effect of rainwater harvesting with ridge and furrow on yield of potato in semiarid areas. Field Crops Research, 84, 385-391. DOI URL
[16]	Yang WZ (杨文治), Shao MA (邵明安), Peng XD (彭新德) (1998). On the relationship between environmental aridization of the Loess Plateau and soil water of loess. Science in China Series D (中国科学·D辑), 28, 357-365. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Zhao YY (赵姚阳), Liu WZ (刘文兆), Pu LM (濮励木) (2002). Effect of alfalfa growth on soil water environment in hill-gully area of the Loess Plateau. Journal of Nature Research (自然资源学报), 20, 85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Zhu XN (朱湘宁), Guo JX(郭继勋), Liang CZ(梁存柱) (2002). Irrigation effects on the yield of alfalfa and soil-water condition in Huabei Plain. Grassland of China (中国草地), 24(6), 32-37. (in Chinese with English abstract)

半干旱黄土丘陵区垄沟集雨对紫花苜蓿人工草地土壤水分和产草量的影响

EFFECT OF RIDGE AND FURROW MICRO-CATCHMENT ON SOIL WATER IN SEEDED MEDICAGO SATIVA GRASSLAND IN THE SEMIARID LOESS HILL AND GULLY REGION OF NORTHWESTERN CHINA

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	冯银平, 沈海花, 罗永开, 徐龙超, 刘上石, 朱言坤, 赵梦颖, 邢爱军, 方精云. 种植密度对苜蓿生长及生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3): 248-256.
[2]	宋小艳, 王根绪, 冉飞, 杨燕, 张莉, 肖瑶. 东北大兴安岭演替初期泰加林灌草层典型植物开花物候与生长对模拟暖干化气候的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(5): 539-549.
[3]	李晋波, 姚楠, 赵英, 范庭, 张建国, 兰志龙, 易军, 司炳成. 不同放牧条件下锡林郭勒典型草原土壤水分分布特征及降水入渗估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 1033-1042.
[4]	徐婷, 赵成章, 韩玲, 冯威, 段贝贝, 郑慧玲. 张掖湿地旱柳叶脉密度与水分利用效率的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(7): 761-769.
[5]	陈敏玲, 张兵伟, 任婷婷, 王姗姗, 陈世苹. 内蒙古半干旱草原土壤水分对降水格局变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(7): 658-668.
[6]	孙鹏森, 刘宁, 刘世荣, 孙阁. 川西亚高山流域水碳平衡研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(10): 1037-1048.
[7]	刘志英, 李西良, 李峰, 王宗礼, 孙启忠. 紫花苜蓿秋眠性对低温驯化过程与越冬耐寒适应的作用机理[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(6): 635-648.
[8]	张彬,朱建军,刘华民,潘庆民. 极端降水和极端干旱事件对草原生态系统的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(9): 1008-1018.
[9]	熊育久,邱国玉,谢芳. 内蒙古太仆寺旗退耕草地植物种类变化与水分收支[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(5): 425-439.
[10]	夏江宝, 张淑勇, 赵自国, 赵艳云, 高源, 谷广义, 孙景宽. 贝壳堤岛旱柳光合效率的土壤水分临界效应及其阈值分级[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(9): 851-860.
[11]	王荣荣, 夏江宝, 杨吉华, 赵艳云, 刘京涛, 孙景宽. 贝壳砂生境干旱胁迫下杠柳叶片光合光响应模型比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(2): 111-121.
[12]	刘苏峡, 邢博, 袁国富, 莫兴国, 林忠辉. 中国根层与表层土壤水分关系分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(1): 1-17.
[13]	马理辉,吴普特,汪有科. 黄土丘陵半干旱区密植枣林随树龄变化的根系空间分布特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 292-301.
[14]	覃凤飞,李强,崔棹茗,李洪萍,杨智然. 越冬期遮阴条件下3个不同秋眠型紫花苜蓿品种叶片解剖结构与其光生态适应性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 333-345.
[15]	王红丽, 张绪成, 宋尚有. 半干旱区旱地不同覆盖种植方式玉米田的土壤水分和产量效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(8): 825-833.