中国北方温带灌丛生态系统碳、氮、磷储量

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2016.0201

植物生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 14-21.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0201

所属专题：中国灌丛生态系统碳储量的研究

中国北方温带灌丛生态系统碳、氮、磷储量

郭焱培¹, 杨弦¹, 安尼瓦尔·买买提², 刘鸿雁¹, 马文红³, 于顺利⁴, 唐志尧^1,^*()

¹北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京 100871
²中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830011
³内蒙古大学生命科学学院, 呼和浩特 010021
⁴中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2016-06-14 接受日期:2016-11-10 出版日期:2017-01-10 发布日期:2017-01-23
通讯作者: 唐志尧
作者简介:* 通信作者Author for correspondence (E-mail:sunzhiqiang1956@sina.com)
基金资助:
中国科学院战略先导性科技专项(XDA05050301)

Storage of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in temperate shrubland ecosystems across Northern China

Yan-Pei GUO¹, Xian YANG¹, Anwar MOHHAMOT², Hong-Yan LIU¹, Wen-Hong MA³, Shun-Li YU⁴, Zhi-Yao TANG^1,^*()

¹College of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

²Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ürümqi 830011, China;

³College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China

⁴State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received:2016-06-14 Accepted:2016-11-10 Online:2017-01-10 Published:2017-01-23
Contact: Zhi-Yao TANG
About author:KANG Jing-yao(1991-), E-mail: kangjingyao_nj@163.com。

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究生态系统碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)密度分布和储量对于理解生态系统碳循环和养分循环的机制和规律有重要意义。现有的相关研究多集中在森林和草地生态系统。在中国北方, 灌丛生境水分和土壤条件差异很大, 这为研究生态系统C、N、P密度与储量的分布格局提供了良好条件。该研究调查了433个中国北方温带灌丛样地的生物量、凋落物以及土壤等组分的有机C及N、P含量, 据此计算出中国北方灌丛生态系统有机C及N、P密度和储量。结果表明: 中国北方灌丛平均生态系统有机C及N、P密度分别为69.8 Mg·hm^-2、7.3 Mg·hm^-2、4.2 Mg·hm^-2。其中, 生物量C、N、P密度分别为5.1 Mg·hm^-2、11.5×10^-2 Mg·hm^-2、8.6×10^-3 Mg·hm^-2, 生物量C、N、P密度与降水和土壤养分关系显著; 凋落物C、N、P密度分别为1.4 Mg·hm^-2、3.8×10^-2 Mg·hm^-2、2.5×10^-3 Mg·hm^-2, 凋落物C、N、P密度与温度和降水关系显著; 1 m深土壤的平均有机C及N、P密度分别为64.0 Mg·hm^-2、7.1 Mg·hm^-2、4.2 Mg·hm^-2, 土壤有机C及N密度与温度和降水关系显著。中国北方灌丛生态系统的总有机C及N、P储量分别为1.7 Pg、164.9 Tg、124.8 Tg。其中生物量C、N、P储量分别为128.4 Tg、3.1 Tg、0.2 Tg; 凋落物C、N、P储量分别为8.4 Tg、0.45 Tg、0.027 Tg; 土壤是最大的C、N、P库, 1 m深土壤有机C及N、P储量分别为1.6 Pg、161.3 Tg、124.6 Tg。

关键词: 碳, 氮, 磷, 储量, 密度, 灌丛, 中国北方

Abstract:

Aims Studying storage of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in ecosystems is of significance in understanding carbon and nutrient cycling. Previous researches in ecosystem C, N and P storage have biased towards forests and grasslands. Shrubland ecosystems encompass a wide gradient in precipitation and soil conditions, providing a unique opportunity to explore the patterns of ecosystem C, N and P storage in relation to climate and soil properties.
Methods We estimated densities and storage of organic C, N and P of shrubland ecosystems in Northern China based on data from 433 shrubland sites.
Important findings The main results are summarized as follows: the average organic C, N and P densities in temperate shrubland ecosystems across Northern China were 69.8 Mg·hm^-2, 7.3 Mg·hm^-2 and 4.2 Mg·hm^-2, respectively. The average plant C, N and P densities were 5.1 Mg·hm^-2, 11.5 × 10^-2 Mg·hm^-2 and 8.6 × 10^-3 Mg·hm^-2, respectively, and were significantly correlated with precipitation and soil nutrient concentrations. The average litter C, N and P densities were 1.4 Mg·hm^-2, 3.8 ×10^-2 Mg·hm^-2, 2.5 ×10^-3 Mg·hm^-2and were significantly correlated with temperature and precipitation. The average soil organic C, N and P densities in the top 1 m were 64.0 Mg·hm^-2, 7.1 Mg·hm^-2 and 4.2 Mg·hm^-2, respectively and the former two were significantly correlated with temperature and precipitation. The total organic C, N and P storage of shrublands in Northern China were 1.7 Pg, 164.9 Tg and 124.8 Tg, respectively. The plant C, N and P storage were 128.4 Tg, 3.1 Tg and 0.2 Tg, respectively. The litter C, N and P storage were 8.4 Tg, 0.45 Tg, 0.027 Tg, respectively. Soil is the largest C, N and P pool in the studied area. The soil organic C, N and P storage in the top 1 meter were 1.6 Pg, 161.3 Tg and 124.6 Tg, respectively.

Key words: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, storage, density, shrublands, Northern China

郭焱培, 杨弦, 安尼瓦尔·买买提, 刘鸿雁, 马文红, 于顺利, 唐志尧. 中国北方温带灌丛生态系统碳、氮、磷储量. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(1): 14-21. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0201

Yan-Pei GUO, Xian YANG, Anwar MOHHAMOT, Hong-Yan LIU, Wen-Hong MA, Shun-Li YU, Zhi-Yao TANG. Storage of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in temperate shrubland ecosystems across Northern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(1): 14-21. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0201

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2016.0201

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2017/V41/I1/14

图/表 5

表1 中国北方主要灌丛的碳、氮、磷密度(平均值±标准误差)

Table 1 Carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) densities of major shrublands in Northern China (mean ± SE)

	落叶阔叶灌丛 Deciduous broadleaf shrublands	稀疏灌丛 Sparse shrublands	总计 Total
样地数 Number of sites	329	104	433
碳密度 C density (Mg·hm^-2)	86.1 ± 3.7	22.1 ± 2.0	69.8 ± 3.0
生物量 Biomass (Mg·hm^-2)	6.1 ± 0.3	1.9 ± 0.3	5.1 ± 0.2
凋落物 Litter (Mg·hm^-2)	1.5 ± 0.2	0.7 ± 0.1	1.4 ± 0.1
土壤有机碳 Soil organic C (Mg·hm^-2)	78.5 ± 3.6	19.5 ± 1.9	64.0 ± 3.0
氮密度 N density (Mg·hm^-2)	8.1 ± 0.3	2.6 ± 0.3	7.3 ± 0.3
生物量 Biomass (10^-2 Mg·hm^-2)	12.9 ± 0.6	6.4 ± 0.7	11.5 ± 0.5
凋落物 Litter (10^-2 Mg·hm^-2)	4.0 ± 0.4	1.8 ± 0.2	3.8 ± 0.3
土壤 Soil (Mg·hm^-2)	7.9 ± 0.4	2.5 ± 0.3	7.1 ± 0.3
磷密度 P density (Mg·hm^-2)	4.3 ± 0.2	3.7 ± 0.3	4.2 ± 0.2
生物量 Biomass (10^-3 Mg·hm^-2)	9.9 ± 0.5	3.6 ± 0.3	8.6 ± 0.4
凋落物 Litter (10^-3 Mg·hm^-2)	2.7 ± 0.2	0.9 ± 0.2	2.5 ± 0.2
土壤 Soil (Mg·hm^-2)	4.3 ± 0.2	3.7 ± 0.3	4.2 ± 0.2

图1 中国北方灌丛生物量碳(A-D)、氮(E-H)、磷(I-L)密度与环境的关系(点线: p > 0.01; 短划线: 0.001 < p < 0.01; 实线: p < 0.001)。

Fig. 1 Biomass carbon (C) (A-D), nitrogen (N) (E-H) and phosphorus (P) (I-L) densities for shrublands of Northern China in relation to environmental factors (dotted line: p > 0.01; dashed line: 0.001 < p < 0.01; solid line: p < 0.001). AP, annual precipitation; MAT, mean annual temperature; STN, soil total nitrogen concentration; STP, soil total phosphorus concentration.

图2 中国北方灌丛凋落物碳(A-D)、氮(E-H)、磷(I-L)密度与环境的关系。不同线型和缩写的意义见图1。

Fig. 2 Litter carbon (C) (A-D), nitrogen (N) (E-H) and phosphorus (P) (I-L) densities for shrublands of Northern China in relation to environmental factors. Please see Fig. 1 for the meaning of different line types and abbreviations.

图3 中国北方灌丛土壤有机碳(A, B)、氮(C, D)、磷(E, F)密度与气候的关系。不同线型和缩写的意义见图1。

Fig. 3 Soil organic carbon (C) (A, B), nitrogen (N) (C, D) and phosphorus (P) (E, F) densities for shrubland of Northern China in relation to climatic factors. Please see Fig. 1 for the meaning of different line types and abbreviations.

表2 中国北方主要灌丛的碳、氮、磷储量

Table 2 Carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) storage of major shrublands in Northern China

灌丛植被型 Shrubland types	落叶阔叶灌丛 Deciduous broadleaf shrublands	稀疏灌丛 Sparse shrublands	总计 Total
面积 Area (10⁴ hm²)	1 828.6	1 050.4	2 879.0
碳储量 C storage (Tg)	1 537.6	183.5	1 721.1
生物量 Biomass	118.6	9.8	128.4
凋落物 Litter	8.2	0.2	8.4
土壤有机碳 Soil organic C	1 410.8	173.5	1 584.3
氮储量 N storage (Tg)	137.1	27.8	164.9
生物量 Biomass	2.8	0.3	3.1
凋落物 Litter	4.5	0.0	4.5
土壤 Soil	133.8	27.5	161.3
磷储量 P storage (Tg)	80.7	44.1	124.8
生物量 Biomass	0.2	0.0	0.2
凋落物 Litter	2.7	0.0	2.7
土壤 Soil	80.5	44.1	124.6

参考文献 29

[1]	Bai YF, Wu JG, Xing Q, Pan QM, Huang JH, Yang DL, Han XG (2008). Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau.Ecology, 89, 2140-2153.
[2]	Brooks ML (2003). Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert.Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 344-353.
[3]	Chapin III FS (1980). The mineral nutrition of wild plants.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 233-260.
[4]	Chapin III FS, Vitousek PM, van Cleve K (1986). The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities.The American Naturalist, 127, 48-58.
[5]	Cleveland CC, Liptzin D (2007). C, N, P stoichiometry in soil, is there a ‘Redfield ratio’ for the microbial biomass?Biogeochemistry, 85, 235-252.
[6]	Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994). Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems.Science, 263, 185-190.
[7]	Ellert BH, Gregorich EG (1996). Storage of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in cultivated and adjacent forested soils of Ontario.Soil Science, 161, 587-603.
[8]	Fan J, Zhong H, Harris W, Yu G, Wang S, Hu Z, Yue Y (2008). Carbon storage in the grasslands of China based on field measurements of above- and below-ground biomass.Climatic Change, 86, 375-396.
[9]	Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci LJ (2001). Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998.Science, 292, 2320-2322.
[10]	Fang JY, Guo ZD, Piao SL, Chen AP (2007). Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981-2000.Science China Earth Sciences, 37, 804-812. (in Chinese)[方精云, 郭兆迪, 朴世龙, 陈安平 (2007). 1981~2000年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算. 中国科学: 地球科学, 37, 804-812.]
[11]	Fang JY, Yang YH, Ma WH, Mohammat A, Shen HH (2010). Ecosystem carbon stocks and their changes in China’s grasslands.Science China Life Sciences, 40, 566-576. (in Chinese)[方精云, 杨元合, 马文红, 安尼瓦尔·买买提, 沈海花 (2010). 中国草地生态系统碳库及其变化. 中国科学: 生命科学, 40, 566-576.]
[12]	Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas.International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965-1978.
[13]	Hobbie SE (1996). Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan Tundra.Ecological Monographs, 66, 503-522.
[14]	Hu HF, Wang ZH, Liu GH, Fu BJ (2006). Vegetation carbon storage of major shrublands in China.Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 30, 539-544. (in Chinese with English abstract)[胡会峰, 王志恒, 刘国华, 傅伯杰 (2006). 中国主要灌丛植被碳储量. 植物生态学报, 30, 539-544.]
[15]	Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000). The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation.Ecological Applications, 10, 423-436.
[16]	John MK (1970). Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant materials with ascorbic acid.Soil Science, 109, 214-220.
[17]	Ni J (2001). Carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China, estimates at different spatial resolutions and their respon- ses to climate change.Climatic Change, 49, 339-358.
[18]	Ni J (2002). Carbon storage in grasslands of China.Journal of Arid Environments, 50, 205-218.
[19]	Piao SL, Fang JY, He JS, Xiao Y (2004). Spatial distribution of grassland biomass in China.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28, 491-498. (in Chinese with English abstract)[朴世龙, 方精云, 贺金生, 肖玉 (2004). 中国草地植被生物量及其空间分布格局. 植物生态学报, 28, 491-498.]
[20]	Post WM, Pastor J, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG (1985). Global patterns of soil nitrogen storage.Nature, 317, 613-616.
[21]	Schimel DS, Braswell BH, Holland EA, McKeown R, Ojima DS, Painter TH, Parton WJ, Townsend AR (1994). Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils.Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 8, 279-293.
[22]	Tian H, Wang S, Liu J, Pan S, Chen H, Zhang C, Shi X (2006). Patterns of soil nitrogen storage in China. Global Biogeo- chemical Cycles, 20, GB1001. doi: 10.1029/2005GB002464.
[23]	Wynn JG, Bird MI, Vellen L, Grand-Clement E, Carter J, Berry SL (2006). Continental-scale measurement of the soil organic carbon pool with climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20, GB1007. doi: 10.1029/2005GB002576.
[24]	Yang X, Tang ZY, Ji CJ, Liu HY, Ma WH, Mohhamot A, Shi ZY, Sun W, Wang T, Wu X, Yu SL, Yue M, Zheng CY (2014). Scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus across plant organs in shrubland biomes across Northern China.Scientific Reports, 4, 5488. doi: 10.1038/srep05448.
[25]	Yang YH, Ma WH, Mohhamot A, Fang JY (2007). Storage, patterns and controls of soil nitrogen in China.Pedosphere, 17, 776-785.
[26]	Zhang L, Wu BF, Li XS, Xing Q (2014). Classification system of China land cover for carbon budget.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 7158-7166. (in Chinese with English abstract)[张磊, 吴炳方, 李晓松, 邢强 (2014). 基于碳收支的中国土地覆被分类系统. 生态学报, 34, 7158-7166.]
[27]	Zhao M, Zhou GS (2004). Carbon storage of forest vegetation and its relationship with climatic factors.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 24, 50-54. (in Chinese with English abstract)[赵敏, 周广胜 (2004). 中国森林生态系统的植物碳贮量及其影响因子分析. 地理科学, 24, 50-54.]
[28]	Zhou XH, Talley M, Luo YQ (2009). Biomass, litter, and soil respiration along a precipitation gradient in southern Great Plains, USA.Ecosystems, 12, 1369-1380.
[29]	Zhou YR, Yu ZL, Zhao SD (2000). Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24, 518-522. (in Chinese with English abstract)[周玉荣, 于振良, 赵士洞 (2000). 我国主要森林生态系统碳贮量和碳平衡. 植物生态学报, 24, 518-522.]

中国北方温带灌丛生态系统碳、氮、磷储量

Storage of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in temperate shrubland ecosystems across Northern China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	史欢欢雪穷于振林汪承焕. 密度、物种比例对盐沼植物种子萌发阶段种内、种间相互作用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(预发表): 0-0.
[2]	罗来聪赖晓琴白健李爱新方海富唐明胡冬南张令. 氮添加背景下土壤真菌和细菌对不同种源入侵植物乌桕生长特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(预发表): 0-0.
[3]	李小玲朱道明余玉蓉吴浩牟利洪柳刘雪飞卜贵军薛丹吴林. 模拟氮沉降对鄂西南贫营养泥炭地两种藓类植物生长与分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(预发表): 0-0.
[4]	杨元合张典业魏斌刘洋冯雪徽毛超徐玮婕贺美王璐郑志虎王媛媛陈蕾伊彭云峰. 草地群落多样性和生态系统碳氮循环对氮输入的非线性响应及其机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[5]	李变变张凤华赵亚光孙秉楠. 不同刈割程度对油莎豆非结构性碳水化合物代谢以及生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[6]	张慧曾文静龚新桃马泽清. 亚热带典型树种根毛特征及其共生真菌关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[7]	姚萌康荣华王盎马方园李靳台子晗方运霆. 利用15N示踪技术研究乔木幼苗对NO2的吸收与分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[8]	党宏忠, 张学利, 韩辉, 石长春, 葛玉祥, 马全林, 陈帅, 刘春颖. 樟子松固沙林林水关系研究进展及对营林实践的指导[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 971-983.
[9]	李万年, 罗益敏, 黄则月, 杨梅. 望天树人工幼林混交对土壤微生物功能多样性与碳源利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1109-1124.
[10]	伍敏, 田雨, 樊大勇, 张祥雪. 干旱胁迫下毛白杨和元宝槭的水力学调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1086-1097.
[11]	董六文, 任正炜, 张蕊, 谢晨笛, 周小龙. 功能多样性比物种多样性更好解释氮添加对高寒草地生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 871-881.
[12]	冯继广, 张秋芳, 袁霞, 朱彪. 氮磷添加对土壤有机碳的影响: 进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 855-870.
[13]	甘子莹, 王浩, 丁驰, 雷梅, 杨晓刚, 蔡敬琰, 丘清燕, 胡亚林. 亚热带森林不同植物及器官来源的可溶性有机质输入对土壤激发效应的影响及其作用机理[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 797-810.
[14]	谢欢, 张秋芳, 陈廷廷, 曾泉鑫, 周嘉聪, 吴玥, 林惠瑛, 刘苑苑, 尹云锋, 陈岳民. 氮添加促进丛枝菌根真菌和根系协作维持土壤磷有效性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 811-822.
[15]	董涵君, 王兴昌, 苑丹阳, 柳荻, 刘玉龙, 桑英, 王晓春. 温带不同材性树种树干非结构性碳水化合物的径向分配差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 722-734.