小麦和玉米根系取样位置优化确定及根系分布模拟

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00036

植物生态学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 365-372.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00036

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

小麦和玉米根系取样位置优化确定及根系分布模拟

王艳哲¹^,²^,³^,^*(), 邵立威¹, 刘秀位¹^,³, 张小雨¹^,³, 张喜英¹^,^**()

¹中国科学院农业水资源和河北省节水农业重点实验室, 遗传与发育生物学研究所农业资源研究中心, 石家庄 050021
²河北经贸大学生物科学与工程学院, 石家庄 050061
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2012-07-09 接受日期:2013-02-20 出版日期:2013-07-09 发布日期:2013-04-09
通讯作者: 王艳哲,张喜英
作者简介:**(E-mail:xyzhang@sjziam.ac.cn)
*E-mail:wyzhe@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然基金项目(31071369);国家自然基金项目(3117-1511)

Optimization of root sampling sites and modeling root length density distribution for wheat and maize

WANG Yan-Zhe¹^,²^,³^,^*(), SHAO Li-Wei¹, LIU Xiu-Wei¹^,³, ZHANG Xiao-Yu¹^,³, ZHANG Xi-Ying¹^,^**()

¹Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Hebei Key Laboratory of Water-Saving Agriculture, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
²College of Biology Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2012-07-09 Accepted:2013-02-20 Online:2013-07-09 Published:2013-04-09
Contact: WANG Yan-Zhe,ZHANG Xi-Ying

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了确定小麦(Triticum aestivum)、玉米(Zea mays)根系的最优取样位置和更准确地模拟根长密度在土壤剖面的分布, 在冬小麦和夏玉米的灌浆后期, 采用根钻法取样, 比较了不同取样位置对根系分布的影响; 采用Gerwitz和Page模型对根长密度的分布进行了模拟。结果表明, 冬小麦行间和行上取样在0-10 cm土层根长密度差异显著, 在10 cm以下土层差异减少。在确定根长密度分布的取样中, 在0-20 cm土层应考虑根长密度分布的空间差异, 即行上密度大于行间密度; 而在20-100 cm土层, 需要考虑行间根长密度大于行上的空间差异; 在1 m以下土层两个位置的差异逐渐消失, 可不考虑空间差异。夏玉米根长密度在上层土壤表现出距离植株不同位置差异显著的特征。植株位置(株上)、距植株10 cm和距植株20 cm位置根长密度在土壤中的分布特征是: 0-10 cm土层3个位置根长密度差异在50%以上, 根长密度大小是株上>距植株10 cm>距植株20 cm; 而在10-30 cm层次, 根长密度表现为距植株10 cm>株上>距植株20 cm, 30-50 cm土层株上位置的根长密度最小, 50 cm以下各位置根长密度差异不明显。对于玉米根系取样, 50 cm以上土层需要考虑根长密度的空间差异, 50 cm以下土层可不考虑。采用Gerwitz和Page模型, 结合华北平原机械化耕作下形成的土壤犁底层变厚及其犁底层容重增加对根系分布的影响, 在模型中加入土壤容重参数订正可以使模型更准确地模拟根长密度在土壤剖面的分布。

关键词: 根系模拟, 根系取样, 小麦, 玉米

Abstract:

Aims Our objectives were to optimize the positions for root sampling of winter wheat and maize and to simulate the distribution of root length density (RLD) throughout the root zone profile in the North China Plain.
Methods Soil cores were taken at different locations in fields of winter wheat and summer maize at the grain-fill stage, and results were compared to decide the positions for root sampling. The bulk density parameter was used to modify the Gerwitz and Page model to increase the accuracy in simulating the distribution of RLD throughout the soil profile.
Important findings There was a larger spatial difference in RLD in the 0-10 cm soil layer for winter wheat. The difference became smaller below the 10 cm soil layer. For the top 20 cm soil layer, RLD on the row was greater than that between two rows. However, below 20 cm, the situation was reversed, i.e., RLD between two rows was greater than that on the row, indicating the strong proliferation ability of the root system of winter wheat. For maize, RLD sampled at the stem was greater than that sampled 10 cm away from the stem, and much greater than that sampled 20 cm away from the stem for the 0-10 cm soil layer. Below the 10 cm soil layer, RLD was highest sampled 10 cm away from the stem. RLD sampled at the stem around the 30-50 cm soil layer was the lowest among the three positions. The results indicated that in the top soil layer, RLD immediately under the plants was the highest, and RLD decreased with increased distance away from the plant stem. However, with increased soil depth, root proliferation reduced the differences among locations. The high bulk density of soil pan around 10-30 cm significantly influenced the shape of the curve of RLD distribution along the soil profile. Introducing the bulk density parameter into the Gerwitz and Page model significantly reduced the errors of simulated and measured RLD throughout the root zone profile.

Key words: root distribution simulation, root sampling, Triticum aestivum, Zea mays

王艳哲, 邵立威, 刘秀位, 张小雨, 张喜英. 小麦和玉米根系取样位置优化确定及根系分布模拟. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(4): 365-372. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00036

WANG Yan-Zhe, SHAO Li-Wei, LIU Xiu-Wei, ZHANG Xiao-Yu, ZHANG Xi-Ying. Optimization of root sampling sites and modeling root length density distribution for wheat and maize. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(4): 365-372. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00036

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00036

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2013/V37/I4/365

图/表 7

图1 2011年夏玉米收获后两个根系取样地点0-200 cm土壤容重。

Fig. 1 Soil bulk density (0-200 cm) at the two root sampling spots measured after harvesting of summer maize in 2011.

图2 灌溉两次水冬小麦不同取样位置对根长密度在土壤剖面分布的影响。

Fig. 2 Root length density (RLD) along the soil profile at different sampling spots under two irrigations conditions for winter wheat.

图3 灌浆期不同取样位置对玉米根长密度在土壤剖面分布的影响(n = 4)。

Fig. 3 Root length density (RLD) along the soil profile at different sampling spots for summer maize at grain-fill stage (n = 4).

图4 不同取样地点根长密度在土壤剖面的分布。

Fig. 4 Root length density along soil profile under different treatments at two sampling spots.

图5 不同根系分布参数模拟的样地一(A、B)和样地二(C、D)在充分灌溉条件下的土壤剖面中冬小麦、夏玉米灌浆期相对根长密度的分布和实测值。

Fig. 5 Measured and simulated relative root length density along soil profile at grain-fill stage for winter wheat and summer maize under well-watered condition using a fixed root distribution coefficient δ in sampling spot 1 (A, B) and sampling spot 2 (C, D).

图6 固定根系分布参数(δ = 3)模拟以及加入土壤容重参数订正后样地一(A, B)和样地二(C, D)在充分灌溉条件下的土壤剖面中冬小麦和夏玉米灌浆期相对根长密度的分布和实测值。

Fig. 6 Measured relative root length density along soil profile at grain-fill stage for winter wheat and summer maize under well-watered condition using a fixed root distribution coefficient (δ = 3) and simulated values with and without bulk density modification in sampling spot 1 (A, B) and sampling spot 2 (C, D).

图7 用根系分布参数(δ = 3)模拟以及加入土壤容重参数订正后模拟结果和实测结果的比较。

Fig. 7 The relation of measured relative root length density with simulated values (δ = 3) with and without bulk density modification.

参考文献 21

[1]	Batey T (2009). Soil compaction and soil management―a review. Soil Use and Manage, 25, 335-345.
[2]	Böhm W (1979). Methods of Studying Root System. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
[3]	Cai KZ (2011). Crop Roots Physiological Ecology . Chemical Industry Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 蔡昆争 (2011). 作物根系生理生态学. 化学工业出版社, 北京.]
[4]	Clark LJ, Whalley WR, Barraclough PB (2003). How do roots penetrate strong soil? Plant and Soil, 255, 93-104.
[5]	Comas LH, Bauerle TL, Eissenstat DM (2010). Biological and environmental factors controlling root dynamics and function: effects of root ageing and soil moisture. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 16, 131-137.
[6]	Dupuy L, Gregory PJ, Bengough AG (2010). Root growth models: towards a new generation of continuous approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 2131-2143. URL PMID
[7]	Gale MR, Grigal DF (1987). Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 829-834.
[8]	Gerwitz A, Page ER (1974). An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 14, 312-316.
[9]	Li ZX, Chen YQ, Wang QC, Liu KC, Gao WS, Sui P (2012). Influence of planting density on root spatio-temporal dis- tribution of different types of maize under high-yielding cultivation conditions. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 38, 1286-1294. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李宗新, 陈源泉, 王庆成, 刘开昌, 高旺盛, 隋鹏 (2012). 高产栽培条件下种植密度对不同类型玉米品种根系时空分布动态的影响. 作物学报, 38, 1286-1294.]
[10]	Liedgens M, Richner W (2001). Minirhizotron observations of the spatial distribution of the maize root system. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1097-1104.
[11]	Lipec J, Hatano R (2003). Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth. Geoderma, 116, 107-136.
[12]	Ma LW, Hoogenboom G, Saseendran SA, Bartling PS, Ahuja LR, Green TR (2009). Effects of estimating soil hydraulic properties and root growth factor on soil water balance and crop production. Agronomy Journal, 101, 572-583. DOI URL
[13]	Mao ZQ, Ning ZR, Liu YH, Zhang KF (2005). Comparative study on two root sampling methods and winter wheat root distribution in soil profile. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 21, 261-265. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 毛振强, 宁振荣, 刘云慧, 张克峰 (2005). 两种根系取样方法的对比及冬小麦根系的分布规律. 中国农学通报, 21, 261-265.]
[14]	Morris LA, Ludovici KH, Torreano SJ, Carter EA, Lincoln MC, Will RE (2006). An approach for using general soil physical condition root growth relationships to predict seeding growth response to site preparation tillage in loblolly pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 227, 169-177.
[15]	Pedersen A, Zhang KF, Thorup-Kristens K, Jensen LS (2010). Modelling diverse root density dynamics and deep nitrogen uptake—simple approach. Plant and Soil, 326, 493-510.
[16]	Tennant D (1975). A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology, 63, 995-1001. DOI URL
[17]	Thorup-Kristensen K (2006). Root growth and nitrogen uptake of carrot, early cabbage, onion and lettuce following a range of green manures. Soil Use and Management, 22, 29-39.
[18]	Xiong SP, Wang XC, Li CM, Ma XM, Du SY, Zhang YW, Lin SZ (2011). Responses of the spatial-temporal distribution of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum) roots and yield to different ratios of nitrogen sources. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 759-768. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 熊淑萍, 王小纯, 李春明, 马新明, 杜少勇, 张营武, 蔺世召 (2011). 冬小麦根系时空分布动态及产量对不同氮源配施的响应. 植物生态学报, 35, 759-768.]
[19]	Zhang XY (1999). Crop Roots and Soil Water Use. China Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 张喜英 (1999). 作物根系与土壤水利用. 气象出版社, 北京.]
[20]	Zhang XY, Pei D, Chen SY (2004). Root growth and soil water utilization of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Hydrological Processes, 18, 2275-2287.
[21]	Zhang XY, Shao LW, Sun HY, Chen SY, Wang YZ (2012). Incorporation of soil bulk density in simulating root distribution of winter wheat and maize in two contrasting soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76, 638-647.

小麦和玉米根系取样位置优化确定及根系分布模拟

Optimization of root sampling sites and modeling root length density distribution for wheat and maize

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊淑萍, 曹文博, 曹锐, 张志勇, 付新露, 徐赛俊, 潘虎强, 王小纯, 马新明. 水平结构配置对冬小麦冠层垂直结构、微环境及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 188-196.
[2]	郭瑞, 周际, 杨帆, 李峰. 小麦根系在碱胁迫下的生理代谢反应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(6): 683-692.
[3]	徐静馨, 郑有飞, 麦博儒, 赵辉, 储仲芳, 黄积庆, 袁月. 基于涡度相关法的麦田O₃干沉降及不同沉降通道分配的特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(6): 670-682.
[4]	李义博, 宋贺, 周莉, 许振柱, 周广胜. C₄植物玉米的光合-光响应曲线模拟研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(12): 1289-1300.
[5]	高林, 王晓菲, 顾行发, 田庆久, 焦俊男, 王培燕, 李丹. 植冠下土壤类型差异对遥感估算冬小麦叶面积指数的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(12): 1273-1288.
[6]	郑成岩, 邓艾兴, LATIFMANESHHojatollah, 宋振伟, 张俊, 王利, 张卫建. 增温对青藏高原冬小麦干物质积累转运及氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(10): 1060-1068.
[7]	赵文赛, 孙永林, 刘西平. 干旱-复水-再干旱处理对玉米光合能力和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6): 594-603.
[8]	郭瑞, 周际, 杨帆, 李峰, 李昊如, 夏旭, 刘琪. 拔节孕穗期小麦干旱胁迫下生长代谢变化规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12): 1319-1327.
[9]	金皖豫, 李铭, 何杨辉, 杜正刚, 邵钧炯, 张国栋, 周灵燕, 周旭辉. 不同施氮水平对冬小麦生长期土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(3): 249-257.
[10]	郭增江, 于振文, 石玉, 赵俊晔, 张永丽. 拔节期与开花期测墒补灌对小麦旗叶荧光特性和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 757-766.
[11]	熊淑萍, 王静, 王小纯, 丁世杰, 马新明. 耕作方式及施氮量对砂姜黑土区小麦氮代谢及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 767-775.
[12]	师生波, 张怀刚, 师瑞, 李妙, 陈文杰, 孙亚男. 青藏高原春小麦叶片光合作用的光抑制及PSII反应中心光化学效率的恢复分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(4): 375-386.
[13]	黄彩霞, 柴守玺, 赵德明, 康燕霞. 灌溉对干旱区冬小麦干物质积累、分配和产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12): 1333-1344.
[14]	康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 王伟, 欧阳竹. 植物光合CO₂响应模型对光下(暗)呼吸速率拟合的探讨[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12): 1356-1363.
[15]	孟凡超, 张佳华, 姚凤梅. CO₂浓度升高和降水增加协同作用对玉米产量及生长发育的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(10): 1064-1073.