植物生态学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 443-453.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00046
所属专题: 红树林及红树植物
发布日期:
2013-05-16
通讯作者:
李妮亚
基金资助:
CHEN Jian1,LI Ni-Ya1,*(),LIU Qiang1,ZHONG Cai-Rong2,HUANG Min1,ZENG Jia1
Published:
2013-05-16
Contact:
LI Ni-Ya
摘要:
在长期盐胁迫(28天, NaCl浓度从100 mmol·L-1升至400 mmol·L-1)下, 比较研究了引进的无瓣海桑(Sonneratia apetala)和拉关木(Laguncularia racemosa)幼苗叶片的气体交换、叶绿素含量、最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)、O2-· 产生速率以及抗氧化酶的活性, 探讨了两种红树幼苗光合、抗氧化防御能力的差异与耐盐性的关系。结果显示: NaCl处理没有明显地影响两种红树幼苗的生长, 表明盐生植物对盐环境的适应性, 但两种红树的生理反应对NaCl处理存在较大的差异。在实验的第28天(苗木的NaCl累计处理浓度递增到400 mmol·L-1)时, 与对照相比, 无瓣海桑叶片的净光合速率、水分利用效率增加, 气孔导度、蒸腾速率和胞间CO2浓度/大气CO2浓度(Ci/Ca)相应降低; 然而, 拉关木叶的净光合速率、蒸腾速率和水分利用效率均回落到对照的水平, 而气孔导度和Ci/Ca均增加, 表明同样的NaCl浓度处理对拉关木叶的净光合速率影响大于无瓣海桑。在NaCl处理期间, 无瓣海桑Fv/Fm一直保持在0.8以上, 而拉关木的Fv/Fm为0.75以下, 说明无瓣海桑具有高于拉关木的潜在最大光合能力。在实验的第7天(NaCl浓度为100 mmol·L-1)和14天(苗木的NaCl累计处理浓度递增到200 mmol·L-1)时, 两种红树O2-· 产生速率迅速增加, 在实验的第28天(苗木的NaCl累计处理浓度递增到400 mmol·L-1)时, 无瓣海桑O2-· 产生速率是对照的5.3倍, 差异极显著, 此时, 拉关木叶中O2-· 产生速率已降低到低于对照的水平。盐处理诱导了两种红树叶中抗氧化酶(超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)、抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)、谷胱甘肽还原酶(GR)、过氧化物酶(POD))活性增加, 但拉关木增加的幅度大于无瓣海桑, 表明拉关木能响应盐胁迫并上调抗氧化酶活性, 降低盐诱导的膜脂过氧化, 提高耐盐的能力, 无瓣海桑通过提高水分利用效率来保持体内的水分, 同时, 保持PSII的最大光化学量子产量, 使得无瓣海桑在高盐处理时仍能保持高于对照水平的光合速率。
陈坚,李妮亚,刘强,钟才荣,黄敏,曾佳. NaCl处理下两种引进红树的光合及抗氧化防御能力. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(5): 443-453. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00046
CHEN Jian,LI Ni-Ya,LIU Qiang,ZHONG Cai-Rong,HUANG Min,ZENG Jia. Antioxidant defense and photosynthesis for non-indigenous mangrove species Sonneratia apetala and Laguncularia racemosa under NaCl stress. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(5): 443-453. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00046
树种 Species | 盐处理 NaCl treatment (d) | 净光合速率 Pn (μmol CO2·m- 2·s- 1 ) | 气孔导度 Gs (mmol H2O·m- 2·s- 1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol H2O·m- 2·s- 1) | 水分利用效率 WUE (μmol CO2·mmol-1 H2O) | 胞间CO2浓度/ 大气CO2浓度 Ci/Ca |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无瓣海桑 Sonneratia apetala | 对照 CK | 7.813a | 247.083a | 5.240a | 1.491a | 0.820a |
7 | 6.135a | 309.917b | 3.282B | 1.870B | 0.897B | |
14 | 7.183a | 94.058C | 1.176C | 6.111C | 0.672C | |
21 | 8.757a | 146.183D | 2.192D | 3.995D | 0.723D | |
28 | 10.074b | 206.000a | 3.148B | 3.200E | 0.763E | |
拉关木 Laguncularia racemosa | 对照 CK | 5.472a | 144.092a | 3.417a | 1.601a | 0.793a |
7 | 7.914B | 202.200b | 2.120b | 3.730B | 0.802a | |
14 | 6.263a | 224.167C | 3.114a | 2.011C | 0.855B | |
21 | 6.025a | 170.167b | 2.939a | 2.050c | 0.828C | |
28 | 5.124a | 197.167C | 3.337a | 1.750a | 0.862B |
表1 NaCl处理对两种红树气体交换的影响(平均值±标准误差, n = 20)
Table 1 Effect of NaCl treatment on gas exchange of two mangrove plants (mean ± SE, n = 20)
树种 Species | 盐处理 NaCl treatment (d) | 净光合速率 Pn (μmol CO2·m- 2·s- 1 ) | 气孔导度 Gs (mmol H2O·m- 2·s- 1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr (mmol H2O·m- 2·s- 1) | 水分利用效率 WUE (μmol CO2·mmol-1 H2O) | 胞间CO2浓度/ 大气CO2浓度 Ci/Ca |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无瓣海桑 Sonneratia apetala | 对照 CK | 7.813a | 247.083a | 5.240a | 1.491a | 0.820a |
7 | 6.135a | 309.917b | 3.282B | 1.870B | 0.897B | |
14 | 7.183a | 94.058C | 1.176C | 6.111C | 0.672C | |
21 | 8.757a | 146.183D | 2.192D | 3.995D | 0.723D | |
28 | 10.074b | 206.000a | 3.148B | 3.200E | 0.763E | |
拉关木 Laguncularia racemosa | 对照 CK | 5.472a | 144.092a | 3.417a | 1.601a | 0.793a |
7 | 7.914B | 202.200b | 2.120b | 3.730B | 0.802a | |
14 | 6.263a | 224.167C | 3.114a | 2.011C | 0.855B | |
21 | 6.025a | 170.167b | 2.939a | 2.050c | 0.828C | |
28 | 5.124a | 197.167C | 3.337a | 1.750a | 0.862B |
图1 NaCl处理下2种红树植物幼苗叶片叶绿素SPAD值和最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm) (平均值±标准误差, n = 20)。NaCl累计处理浓度: 1/4 Hoagland营养液(对照)、100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7天)、200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14天)、300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21天)、400 mmol·L-1 NaCl (28天)。*, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异显著(p < 0.05); **, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异极显著(p < 0.01)。
Fig. 1 Maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) and SPAD value of seedlings leaves of two mangrove plants under salt treatment (mean ± SE, n = 20). NaCl treatments: 1/4 strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution (CK), 100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7 d), 200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14 d), 300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21 d)、400 mmol·L-1 NaCl (28 d). *, significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.05); **, highly significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.01).
图2 NaCl处理下无瓣海桑和拉关木叶片O2-· 产生速率和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性的变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。NaCl累计处理浓度: 1/4 Hoagland营养液(对照)、100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7天)、200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14天)、300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21天)、400 mmol·L-1NaCl (28天)。*, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异显著(p < 0.05); **, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异极显著(p < 0.01)。
Fig. 2 Changes of O2-· production rate and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in leaves of Sonneratia apetala and Laguncularia racemosa under NaCl treatments (mean ± SE, n = 3). NaCl treatments: 1/4 strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution (CK), 100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7 d), 200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14 d), 300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21 d)、400 mmol·L-1 NaCl (28 d). *, significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.05); **, highly significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.01).
图3 NaCl处理下无瓣海桑和拉关木叶片抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性的变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。NaCl累计处理浓度: 1/4 Hoagland营养液(对照)、100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7天)、200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14天)、300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21天)、400 mmol·L-1 NaCl (28天)。*, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异显著(p < 0.05); **, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异极显著(p < 0.01)。
Fig. 3 Changes of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT) activity in leaves of Sonneratia apetala and Laguncularia racemosa under NaCl treatment (mean ± SE, n = 3). NaCl treatment: 1/4 strength Hongland’s nutrient solution (CK), 100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7 d), 200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14 d), 300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21 d)、400 mmol·L-1 NaCl (28 d). *, significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.05); **, highly significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.01).
图4 NaCl处理对无瓣海桑和拉关木叶片谷胱甘肽还原酶(GR)和过氧化物酶(POD)活性的变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。NaCl累计处理浓度: 1/4 Hoagland营养液(对照)、100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7天)、200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14天)、300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21天)、400 mmol·L-1 NaCl (28天)。*, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异显著(p < 0.05); **, 对照和NaCl处理之间差异极显著(p < 0.01)。
Fig. 4 Changes of glutathione reductase (GR) and peroxidase (POD) activity in leaves of Sonneratia apetala and Laguncularia racemosa under NaCl treatment (mean ± SE, n = 3). NaCl treatment: 1/4 strength Hongland’s nutrient solution (CK), 100 mmol·L-1 NaCl (7 d), 200 mmol·L-1 NaCl (14 d), 300 mmol·L-1 NaCl (21 d)、400 mmol·L-1 NaCl (28 d). *, significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.05); **, highly significant difference between control and NaCl treatments (p < 0.01).
树种 Species | 树龄 Age (a) | 树高 Height (m) | 地径 Ground diameter (cm) | 胸径 Diameter at breast height (cm) | 冠幅 Canopy (m × m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拉关木 Laguncularia racemoca | 5 | 6.3 | 14.4 | 8.5 | 2.1 × 2.6 |
无瓣海桑 Sonneratia apetala | 5 | 9.2 | 20.8 | 12.9 | 4.5 × 4.2 |
海桑 S. caseolaris | 5 | 6.6 | 16.5 | 10.2 | 2.8 × 2.4 |
杯萼海桑 S. alba | 5 | 5.2 | 14.7 | 8.5 | 3.7 × 2.9 |
卵叶海桑 S. ovata | 5 | 2.4 | 9.8 | 3.7 | 1.8 × 1.7 |
表2 海南东寨港拉关木与海桑属植物生长表现比较
Table 2 Comparison of growth state for Laguncularia racemosa and Sonneratia in Dongzhai Harbor of Hainan Island, China
树种 Species | 树龄 Age (a) | 树高 Height (m) | 地径 Ground diameter (cm) | 胸径 Diameter at breast height (cm) | 冠幅 Canopy (m × m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拉关木 Laguncularia racemoca | 5 | 6.3 | 14.4 | 8.5 | 2.1 × 2.6 |
无瓣海桑 Sonneratia apetala | 5 | 9.2 | 20.8 | 12.9 | 4.5 × 4.2 |
海桑 S. caseolaris | 5 | 6.6 | 16.5 | 10.2 | 2.8 × 2.4 |
杯萼海桑 S. alba | 5 | 5.2 | 14.7 | 8.5 | 3.7 × 2.9 |
卵叶海桑 S. ovata | 5 | 2.4 | 9.8 | 3.7 | 1.8 × 1.7 |
[27] | Wang RE, Chen YJ, Huang B, Yang WJ, Zhang Y, Li SC, Liang ZH, Li LF ( 2011). Natural regeneration of indigenous mangroves in Sonneratia apetala Buch.- Ham. Plantations. Journal of South China University of Tropical Agriculture, 2, 342-348. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王仁恩, 陈玉军, 黄勃, 杨文杰, 张钰, 李诗川, 梁振辉, 李隆飞 ( 2011). 无瓣海桑人工林下乡土树种自然更新的初步研究. 热带生物学报, 2, 342-348.] | |
[28] | Xu L, Chen ZH, Yan AF, Yu L ( 2012). Summarization of resistance mechanism of plant to diseases and adversity. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 24, 90-93. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 徐玲, 陈自宏, 晏爱芬, 余丽 ( 2012). 植物抗病抗逆机理的研究概述. 江西农业学报, 24, 90-93.] | |
[29] | Xu X, Mao GL, Li SH, Zhang Y, Xu ZZ ( 2003). Effect of salt stress and abscisic acid on membrane-lipid peroxidation and resistant-oxidation enzyme activities of Lycium barbarum callus. Acta Botanica Boreali- Occidentalia Sinica, 23, 745-749. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 许兴, 毛桂莲, 李树华, 张渊, 许兆桢 ( 2003). NaCl胁迫和外源ABA对枸杞愈伤组织膜脂过氧化及抗氧化酶活性的影响. 西北植物学报, 23, 745-749.] | |
[30] | Zhong CR, Li SC, Yang YC, Zhang Y, Lin ZW ( 2011). Analysis of the introduction effect of a mangrove species Laguncularia racemosa. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 38(3), 96-99. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 钟才荣, 李诗川, 杨宇晨, 张影, 林作武 ( 2011). 红树植物拉关木的引种效果调查研究. 福建林业科技, 38(3), 96-99.] | |
[31] | Zhu HW, Zheng SF, Peng HW, Wu F ( 2012). Allelopathic effects of Acanthus ilicifolius aqueous extracts on Sonneratia apetala. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 32, 34-36, 47. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 朱宏伟, 郑松发, 彭辉武, 武锋 ( 2012). 老鼠簕对无瓣海桑化感作用的研究. 中南林业科技大学学报, 32, 34-36, 47.] | |
[1] |
Ball MC, Farquhar GD ( 1984). Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of two mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, to long term salinity and humidity conditions. Plant Physiology, 74, 1-6.
URL PMID |
[2] |
Bellaire BA, Carmody J, Braud J, Gossett DR, Banks SW, Cranlucas M, Fowler TE ( 2000). Involvement of abscisic acid-dependent and -independent pathways in the upregulation of antioxidant enzyme activity during NaCl stress in cotton callus tissue. Free Radical Research, 33, 531-545.
DOI URL PMID |
[3] |
Bradford MM ( 1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248-254.
URL PMID |
[4] | Chen CP, Wang WQ, Lin P ( 2000). Influences of salinity on the growth and some ecophysiological characteristics of mangrove species, Sonneratia apetala seedlings. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 17, 457-461. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 陈长平, 王文卿, 林鹏 ( 2000). 盐度对无瓣海桑幼苗的生长和某些生理生态特性的影响. 植物学通报, 17, 457-461.] | |
[5] | Diao JM, Chen GZ ( 2008). Effect of light intensity on growth and photosynthetic properties of Sonnerratia apetala seedling. Forest Research, 21, 486-492. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刁俊明, 陈桂珠 ( 2008). 光强对无瓣海桑幼苗的生长和光合特性的影响. 林业科学研究, 21, 486-492.] | |
[6] | Farqfuhar GD, Sharkey TD ( 1982). Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 33, 317-345. |
[7] | Feng L, Bai ZY, Lu BS, Cai SW, Feng LN ( 2008). Effect of salt stress on membrane-lipid peroxidation and resistant-oxidation enzyme activities of Acer mono and Chionanthus retusus. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 23(4), 5-7, 13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 冯蕾, 白志英, 路丙社, 蔡胜文, 冯丽娜( 2008). NaCl胁迫对色木槭和流苏膜脂过氧化及抗氧化酶活性的影响. 西北林学院学报, 23(4), 5-7, 13.] | |
[8] |
Giannopolits CN, Ries SK ( 1977). Superoxide dismutases. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiology, 59, 309-314.
URL PMID |
[9] | Guan LM, Zhao J, Scandalios JG ( 2000). Cis-elements and trans-factors that regulate expression of the maize Cat1 antioxidant gene in response to ABA and osmotic stress: H2O2 is the likely intermediary signaling molecule for the response. The Plant Journal, 22, 87-95. |
[10] | Han SM, Li NY, He P, Zhong CR, Yang Y ( 2010). Photosynthetic characteristics of introduced and indigenous mangrove seedlings in China. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 30, 1667-1674. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 韩淑梅, 李妮亚, 何平, 钟才荣, 杨焰 ( 2010). 引种红树与中国乡土红树幼苗光合特性研究. 西北植物学报, 30, 1667-1674.] | |
[11] | Huang JH, Lin GH, Han XG ( 2005). Comparative studies on water use efficiency of rhizophoraceae plants grown in different environments. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 29, 530-536. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 黄建辉, 林光辉, 韩兴国 ( 2005). 不同生境间红树科植物水分利用效率的比较研究. 植物生态学报, 29, 530-536.] | |
[12] | Jiang MY, Zhang JH ( 2001). Effect of abscisic acid on active oxygen species, antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings. Plant and Cell Physiology, 42, 1265-1273. |
[13] | Li NY, Chen SL, Zhou XY, Li CY, Shao J, Wang RG, Fritz E, Hüttermann A, Polle A ( 2008). Effect of NaCl on photosynthesis, salt accumulation and ion compartmentation in two mangrove species, Kandelia candel and Bruguiera gymnorhiza. Aquatic Botany, 88, 303-310. |
[14] | Li NY, Li CY, Chen SL, Chang Y, Zhang YX, Wang RG, Shi Y, Zheng XJ, Fritz E, Hüttermann A ( 2009). Abscisic acid, calmodulin response to short term and long term salinity and the relevance to NaCl-induced antioxidant defense in two mangrove species. The Open Forest Science Journal, 2, 48-58. |
[15] | Li W, Zhang YL, Hu YY, Yang MS, Wu J, Zhang WF ( 2012). Research on the photoprotection and photosynthesis characteristics of young cotton leaves under field conditions. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 662-670. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李维, 张亚黎, 胡渊渊, 杨美森, 吴洁, 张旺锋 ( 2012). 田间条件下棉花幼叶光合特性及光保护机制. 植物生态学报, 36, 662-670.] | |
[16] | Li Y, Zheng DZ, Chen HX, Liao BW, Zheng SF, Chen XR ( 1998). Preliminary study on introduction of mangrove Sonneratia apetala Buch.-Ham. Forest Research, 11, 39-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李云, 郑德璋, 陈焕雄, 廖宝文, 郑松发, 陈相如 ( 1998). 红树植物无瓣海桑引种的初步研究. 林业科学研究, 11, 39-44.] | |
[17] | Li YY ( 2006). Studies on Leaf Anatomy of Some Mangrove Species. PhD dissertation, Xiamen University, Xiamen. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李元跃 ( 2006). 几种红树植物叶的解剖学研究. 博士学位论文, 厦门大学, 厦门.] | |
[18] | Liao BW, Zheng SF, Chen YJ, Li M, Li YD ( 2004). Biological characteristics and ecological adaptability for non-indigenous mangrove species Sonneratia apetala. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 23, 10-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 廖宝文, 郑松发, 陈玉军, 李玫, 李意德 ( 2004). 外来红树植物无瓣海桑生物学特性与生态环境适应性分析. 生态学杂志, 23, 10-15.] | |
[19] |
Liu L, Du H, Tang XF, Wu YM, Huang YB, Tang YX ( 2008). The roles of MYB transcription factors on plant defense responses and its molecular mechanism. Hereditas, 30, 1265-1271. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL PMID |
[ 刘蕾, 杜海, 唐晓凤, 吴燕民, 黄玉碧, 唐益雄 ( 2008). MYB转录因子在植物抗逆胁迫中的作用及其分子机理. 遗传, 30, 1265-1271.]
DOI URL PMID |
|
[20] | Maslenkova LT, Zanev Y, Popova LP ( 1993). Adaptation to salinity as monitored by PSII oxygen evolving reactions in barley thylakoids. Journal of Plant Physiology, 142, 629-634. |
[21] | Mishra NP, Mishra PK, Singha GS ( 1993). Changes in the activities of anti-oxidant enzymes during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visible light at different temperatures in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors. Plant Physiology, 102, 903-910. |
[22] | Niu SL, Jiang GM, Li YG ( 2004). Environmental regulations of C3 and C4 plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 308-314. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 牛书丽, 蒋高明, 李永庚 ( 2004). C3与C4植物的环境调控. 生态学报, 24, 308-314.] | |
[23] | Peng YG, Xu ZC, Liu MC ( 2012). Introduction and ecological effects of an exotic mangrove species Sonneratia apetala. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 2259-2270. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 彭友贵, 徐正春, 刘敏超 ( 2012). 外来红树植物无瓣海桑引种及其生态影响. 生态学报, 32, 2259-2270.] | |
[24] | Shen WB, Xu LL, Ye MB, Zhang RX ( 1996). Study on determination of ASP activity. Plant Physiology Communications, 32, 203-205. (in Chinese) |
[ 沈文飚, 徐朗莱, 叶茂柄, 张荣铣 ( 1996). 抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性测定的探讨. 植物生理学通讯, 32, 203-205.] | |
[25] | Tang RS, Tong HY, Tang XH, Zhong Y, Yu YZ ( 2012). Salt tolerance in rice seedlings improved by ABA. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28, 910-911. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 汤日圣, 童红玉, 唐现洪, 钟雨, 余永柱 ( 2012). 脱落酸提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的效果. 江苏农业学报, 28, 910-911.] | |
[26] | Wang AG, Luo GH ( 1990). Quantitative relation between the reaction of hydroxylamine and superoxide anion radicals in plants. Plant Physiology Communications,( 6), 55-57. (in Chinese) |
[ 王爱国, 罗广华 ( 1990). 植物的超氧物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关系. 植物生理学通讯, ( 6), 55-57.] |
[1] | 杜英东, 袁相洋, 冯兆忠. 不同形态氮对杨树光合特性及生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 348-360. |
[2] | 余玉蓉, 吴浩, 高娅菲, 赵媛博, 李小玲, 卜贵军, 薛丹, 刘正祥, 武海雯, 吴林. 模拟氮沉降对鄂西南湿地泥炭藓生理及形态特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1493-1506. |
[3] | 许红梅, 李进, 张元明. 水分条件对人工培养齿肋赤藓光化学效率及生理特性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(8): 882-893. |
[4] | 刘盟盟, 贾丽, 程路芸, 张洪芹, 臧晓琳, 宝音陶格涛, 张汝民, 高岩. 冷蒿酚酸及其抗氧化防御酶活性对机械损伤的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(2): 219-230. |
[5] | 孔庆仙, 夏江宝, 赵自国, 屈凡柱. 不同地下水矿化度对柽柳光合特征及树干液流的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12): 1298-1309. |
[6] | 郭瑞, 李峰, 周际, 李昊儒, 夏旭, 刘琪. 亚麻响应盐、碱胁迫的生理特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 69-79. |
[7] | 尹本丰, 张元明. 冻融过程对荒漠区不同微生境下齿肋赤藓渗透调节物含量和抗氧化酶活力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(5): 517-529. |
[8] | 孟德云, 侯林琳, 杨莎, 孟静静, 郭峰, 李新国, 万书波. 外源多胺对盆栽花生盐胁迫的缓解作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(12): 1209-1215. |
[9] | 胡楚琦, 刘金珂, 王天弘, 王文琳, 卢山, 周长芳. 三种盐胁迫对互花米草和芦苇光合作用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(1): 92-103. |
[10] | 郭慧媛, 马元丹, 王丹, 左照江, 高岩, 张汝民, 王玉魁. 模拟酸雨对毛竹叶片抗氧化酶活性及释放绿叶挥发物的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(8): 896-903. |
[11] | 张翠萍,孟平,张劲松,万贤崇. 固氮植物绿豆对核桃幼苗生长、叶片气孔气体交换及水力特征的作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(5): 499-506. |
[12] | 夏江宝, 张淑勇, 赵自国, 赵艳云, 高源, 谷广义, 孙景宽. 贝壳堤岛旱柳光合效率的土壤水分临界效应及其阈值分级[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(9): 851-860. |
[13] | 张梓瑜,龚吉蕊,刘敏,黄永梅,晏欣,祁瑜,王忆慧. 温带草原不同土地利用方式下优势种植物和生态系统的气体交换[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(8): 718-727. |
[14] | 王林, 冯锦霞, 万贤崇. 土层厚度对刺槐旱季水分状况和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(3): 248-255. |
[15] | 慈敦伟,戴良香,宋文武,张智猛. 花生萌发至苗期耐盐胁迫的基因型差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(11): 1018-1027. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19