植物生态学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 485-490.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.028
杨文平1,2(), 郭天财1,*(
), 刘胜波1, 王晨阳1, 王永华1, 马冬云1
收稿日期:
2007-01-29
接受日期:
2007-07-25
出版日期:
2008-01-29
发布日期:
2008-03-30
通讯作者:
杨文平,郭天财
作者简介:
E-mail: yangwenping1971@126.com基金资助:
YANG Wen-Ping1,2(), GUO Tian-Cai1,*(
), LIU Sheng-Bo1, WANG Chen-Yang1, WANG Yong-Hua1, MA Dong-Yun1
Received:
2007-01-29
Accepted:
2007-07-25
Online:
2008-01-29
Published:
2008-03-30
Contact:
YANG Wen-Ping,GUO Tian-Cai
摘要:
在大田试验条件下,研究了在同一密度(375×104株·hm-2)下,行距配置对大穗型冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)品种‘兰考矮早八’后期群体冠层结构、冠层微环境及产量构成的影响。结果表明,冠层叶面积指数随着行距的增大而减小;而冠层开度随着行距的增大而增加。行距配置还可改变小麦冠层微环境,冠层不同层次的光截获及消光系数均随着行距的增大而减小;随着行距增加,冠层不同层次的温度升高,而湿度下降;随着行距缩小,冠层不同层次的CO2分布更趋均匀,有利于群体光合作用。通过缩小行距,能够使植株分布均匀,竞争减弱,使产量构成因素实现最佳配置,从而获得较高的产量。从该研究看,15 cm行距的产量最高,可作为该类品种的较佳行距配置。
杨文平, 郭天财, 刘胜波, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 行距配置对‘兰考矮早八’小麦后期群体冠层结构及其微环境的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 485-490. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.028
YANG Wen-Ping, GUO Tian-Cai, LIU Sheng-Bo, WANG Chen-Yang, WANG Yong-Hua, MA Dong-Yun. EFFECTS OF ROW SPACING IN WINTER WHEAT ON CANOPY STRUCTURE AND MICROCLIMATE IN LATER GROWTH STAGE. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(2): 485-490. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.028
图1 行距对不同生育时期叶面积指数(LAI)的影响 B:孕穗期Booting A:开花期Anthesis EF:灌浆初期Early-filling MF:灌浆中期Middle-filling LF: 灌浆末期 Late-filling
Fig.1 Effect of row spacing on leaf area index (LAI) at different growth stages
行距 Row spacing (cm) | 开花期 Anthesis | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
天顶角Zenith angle(°) | 天顶角Zenith angle(°) | ||||||||||
7 | 23 | 38 | 53 | 68 | 7 | 23 | 38 | 53 | 68 | ||
15 | 0.731 | 0.523 | 0.354 | 0.123 | 0.017 | 0.765 | 0.543 | 0.375 | 0.150 | 0.018 | |
20 | 0.845 | 0.633 | 0.478 | 0.155 | 0.019 | 0.778 | 0.550 | 0.376 | 0.161 | 0.019 | |
25 | 0.852 | 0.638 | 0.485 | 0.178 | 0.020 | 0.780 | 0.555 | 0.382 | 0.165 | 0.021 |
表1 行距对小麦冠层开度(CO)的影响
Table 1 Effect of row spacing on canopy openness (CO) in wheat
行距 Row spacing (cm) | 开花期 Anthesis | 灌浆中期 Mid-filling | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
天顶角Zenith angle(°) | 天顶角Zenith angle(°) | ||||||||||
7 | 23 | 38 | 53 | 68 | 7 | 23 | 38 | 53 | 68 | ||
15 | 0.731 | 0.523 | 0.354 | 0.123 | 0.017 | 0.765 | 0.543 | 0.375 | 0.150 | 0.018 | |
20 | 0.845 | 0.633 | 0.478 | 0.155 | 0.019 | 0.778 | 0.550 | 0.376 | 0.161 | 0.019 | |
25 | 0.852 | 0.638 | 0.485 | 0.178 | 0.020 | 0.780 | 0.555 | 0.382 | 0.165 | 0.021 |
行距 Row spacing(cm) | 光截获LI | 消光系数K | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
上层 Up layer | 中层 Middle layer | 下层 Down layer | ||
15 | 0.433a | 0.713a | 0.944a | 0.47a |
20 | 0.430ab | 0.688b | 0.925b | 0.45a |
25 | 0.428b | 0.648c | 0.902c | 0.38b |
表2 行距对小麦冠层不同层次光截获(LI)和消光系数(K)的影响
Table 2 Effect of row spacing on light interception (LI) and extinction coefficient (K)
行距 Row spacing(cm) | 光截获LI | 消光系数K | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
上层 Up layer | 中层 Middle layer | 下层 Down layer | ||
15 | 0.433a | 0.713a | 0.944a | 0.47a |
20 | 0.430ab | 0.688b | 0.925b | 0.45a |
25 | 0.428b | 0.648c | 0.902c | 0.38b |
行距 Row spacing (cm) | 上层 Up layer | 中层 Middle layer | 下层 Down layer | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
温度 Temperature(℃) | 相对湿度 Relative humidity(%) | 温度 Temperature(℃) | 相对湿度 Relative humidity(%) | 温度 Temperature(℃) | 相对湿度 Relative humidity(%) | |||||||
15 | 26.2 ±0.25 | 70.2±0.82 | 27.2±0.21 | 72.1±0.21 | 26.8±0.26 | 72.4± 0.26 | ||||||
20 | 26.3± 0.12 | 69.8±0.38 | 28.3±0.15 | 71.2±0.26 | 27.2±0.31 | 70.0± 0.17 | ||||||
25 | 26.3 ±0.06 | 68.9±0.57 | 29.0± 0.21 | 70.8±0.12 | 27.5±0.21 | 69.3± 0.15 |
表3 行距对小麦冠层温度和湿度的影响(4月28日)
Table 3 Effect of row spacing on canopy temperature and humidity in wheat (28, April) (Mean±SE)
行距 Row spacing (cm) | 上层 Up layer | 中层 Middle layer | 下层 Down layer | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
温度 Temperature(℃) | 相对湿度 Relative humidity(%) | 温度 Temperature(℃) | 相对湿度 Relative humidity(%) | 温度 Temperature(℃) | 相对湿度 Relative humidity(%) | |||||||
15 | 26.2 ±0.25 | 70.2±0.82 | 27.2±0.21 | 72.1±0.21 | 26.8±0.26 | 72.4± 0.26 | ||||||
20 | 26.3± 0.12 | 69.8±0.38 | 28.3±0.15 | 71.2±0.26 | 27.2±0.31 | 70.0± 0.17 | ||||||
25 | 26.3 ±0.06 | 68.9±0.57 | 29.0± 0.21 | 70.8±0.12 | 27.5±0.21 | 69.3± 0.15 |
行距 Row spacing(cm) | 冠层上方 Above canopy | 上层 Up layer | 中层 Middle layer | 下层 Down layer |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 335a | 331a | 320c | 342b |
20 | 336a | 332a | 325b | 345b |
25 | 336a | 334a | 329a | 350a |
表4 行距对冠层不同层次CO2浓度的影响
Table 4 Effect of row spacing on carbon dioxide concentration
行距 Row spacing(cm) | 冠层上方 Above canopy | 上层 Up layer | 中层 Middle layer | 下层 Down layer |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 335a | 331a | 320c | 342b |
20 | 336a | 332a | 325b | 345b |
25 | 336a | 334a | 329a | 350a |
行距 Row spacing (cm) | 穗数 Ear numbers (×104·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grains per spike | 千粒重 1 000-kernel weight(g) | 不孕小穗数 Sterile spikelet numbers per ear | 实际产量 Grain yield ( kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 489.0a | 46.3 | 43.93 | 3.20 | 8786.67a |
20 | 459.0b | 45.1 | 44.11 | 3.94 | 8314.17b |
25 | 441.0c | 43.7 | 45.09 | 4.00 | 8206.67c |
表5 行距对‘兰考矮早八’产量构成因素及产量的影响
Table 5 Effect of row spacing on yield components and yield of wheat
行距 Row spacing (cm) | 穗数 Ear numbers (×104·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grains per spike | 千粒重 1 000-kernel weight(g) | 不孕小穗数 Sterile spikelet numbers per ear | 实际产量 Grain yield ( kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 489.0a | 46.3 | 43.93 | 3.20 | 8786.67a |
20 | 459.0b | 45.1 | 44.11 | 3.94 | 8314.17b |
25 | 441.0c | 43.7 | 45.09 | 4.00 | 8206.67c |
[1] | Andrade FH, Calvifio P, Cirilo A, Barbieri P (2002). Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal, 94, 975-980. |
[2] | Board JE, Harville BG (1992). Explanations for greater light interception in narrow- vs. wide-row soybean. Crop Science, 32, 198-202. |
[3] | Bullock DG, Nielsen RL, Nyquist WE (1988). A growth analysis comparison of corn grown in conventional and equidistant plant spacing. Crop Science, 28, 254-258. |
[4] | Chen SY (陈素英), Zhang XY (张喜英), Chen SL (陈四龙), Pei D (裴冬) Zhang QT (张清涛) (2006). Effects of different row spaces on the soil evaporation and water use in winter wheat field. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (中国生态农业学报), 14(3), 86-89. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Cui DQ (崔党群), Zhang J (张娟), Wen J (闻捷), Wang JZ (王俊振) (2001). Studies on the models for yield structure of super-high-yielding winter wheat cultivars in Huang-huai wheat region. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica (华北农学报), 16(4), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Du BH (杜宝华), Liu MX (刘明孝) (1990). Light condition and its photosynthetic characteristic of winter wheat population. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 11(3), 27-30. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Flenet F, Kiniry JR, Board JE, Westgate ME, Reicosky DC (1996). Row spacing effects on light extinction coefficients of corn, sorghum, soybean and sunflower. Agronomy Journal, 88, 185-190. |
[8] | Guo TC (郭天财), Feng W (冯伟), Zhao HJ (赵会杰), Xue GD (薛国典), Wang HC (王化岑), Wang YH (王永华), Yao ZJ (姚战军) (2004). Photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves and nitrogen effects in two winter wheat cultivars with different spike type. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 30, 115-121. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Guo TC (郭天财), Zha FN (查菲娜), Ma DY (马冬云), Wang CY (王晨阳), Zhu YJ (朱云集), Yue YJ (岳艳军), Song X (宋晓) (2006). Effect of plant density on sugar content and starch accumulation in grains of two winter wheat cultivars with different spike types. Journal of Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 26(4), 128-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Heitholt JJ, Pettigrew WT, Meredith WR (1992). Light interception and lint yield of narrow-row cotton. Crop Science, 32, 728-733. |
[11] | Li SK (李少昆), Wang CT (王崇桃) (1997). The methods of obtaining and expressing information of crop plant shape and population structure. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Edision) (石河子大学学报 (自然科学版)), 1, 250-256. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Liu XB (刘晓冰), Jin J (金剑), Wang GH (王光华), Herbert SJ, Hashemi AM (2004). Influences of row-spacing on competing limited resources in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Soybean Science (大豆科学), 23, 215-221. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Liu KC (刘开昌), Zhang XQ (张秀清), Wang QC (王庆成), Wang CY (王春英), Li AQ (李爱芹) (2000). Effect of plant density on microclimate in canopy of maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 24, 489-493. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Marshall GC, Ohm HW (1987). Yield responses of 16 winter cultivars to row spacing and seeding rate. Agronomy Journal, 79, 1027-1030. |
[15] | Marois JJ, Wright DL, Wiatrak PJ, Vargas MA (2004). Effect of row width and nitrogen on cotton morphology and canopy microclimate. Crop Science, 44, 870-877. |
[16] | Pan QM (潘庆民), Yu ZW (于振文), Dong QY (董庆裕), Zhang HL (张华利), Jiang YK (姜衍坤), Su AT (宿安亭), Li XW (李宪文), Liu CZ (刘存臻) (1997). Population structure analysis of wheat var. Lumai 22 giving 9t/ha of grain. Journal of Shandong Agricultural Science (山东农业科学), (4), 8-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Reta-Sanchez DG, Fowler JL (2002). Canopy light environment and yield of narrow-row cotton as affected by canopy architecture. Agronomy Journal, 94, 1317-1323. |
[18] | Sharratt BS, Mcwilliams DA (2005). Microclimatic and rooting characteristics of narrow-row versus conventional-row corn. Agronomy Journal, 97, 1129-1135. |
[19] | Song QJ (宋启建), Wu TX (吴天侠) (1995). Effects of population structure of summer soybean on yeild and agronomy characteristics in different cultivars. Soybean Science (大豆科学), 14(1), 40-46. (in Chinese) |
[20] | Sun HY (孙宏勇), Liu CM (刘昌明), Zhang XY (张喜英), Chen SY (陈素英), Pei D (裴冬) (2006). Effects of different row spacings on soil evaporation, evapotranspiration and yield of winter wheat. Transactions of the CSAE (农业工程学报), 22(3), 22-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Thorne GN, Pearman I, Day W, Todd AD (1988). Estimation of radiation interception by winter wheats from measurements of leaf area. Journal of Agricultural Science, 110, 101-108. |
[22] | Wang Q (王谦), Chen JL (陈景玲), Sun ZQ (孙治强) (2006). The utility of LAI-2000 canopy analyzer studying the sunlight distribution characteristics in different plant colonies. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 39, 922-927. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Xu HY (徐恒永), Wang QC (王庆成), Zhao JS (赵君实) Xu QZ (徐庆章), Gong XL (宫秀兰), Wang ZX (王忠孝) (1996). Population photosynthetic ability of wheat and maize to get 15 t/ha grains and comprehensive techniques. Journal of Shandong Agricultural Science (山东农业科学), (1), 14-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Zeng ZR (曾浙荣), Zhao SN (赵双宁), Tai JX (台建祥), Li P (李培), Li Q (李青), Fu Q (付琴), Gao SJ (高世菊), Cao ML (曹梅林) (1994). Studies on canopy development and structure and physiological basis of high-yielding wheat varieties in Beijing district. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 27(3), 30-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Zhao HJ (赵会杰), Guo TC (郭天财), Liu HS (刘华山), Zhu YJ (朱云集), Xia GJ (夏国军), Wang YH (王永华), Luo Y (罗毅) (1999). Influence of density on light distribution and some physiological characteristics in wheat canopy with heavy-ear cultivars. Acta Agriculturae Universitis Henanensis (河南农业大学学报), 33(2), 101-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Zhu YJ (朱云集), Guo RL (郭汝礼), Guo TC (郭天财), Zhang QY (张庆友), Wang ZJ (王之杰), Wang YH (王永华) (2001). Effects of spacing form and density on quality of population and grain yield of Laokao 906. Journal of Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 21(2), 62-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Zhu YJ (朱云集), Guo TC (郭天财), Wang CY (王晨阳), Cui JM (崔金梅) (2006). Study on yield formation of winter wheat cultivars with different spikes and their key cultivation techniques for super-high yield. Journal of Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 26(1), 82-86. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 熊淑萍, 曹文博, 曹锐, 张志勇, 付新露, 徐赛俊, 潘虎强, 王小纯, 马新明. 水平结构配置对冬小麦冠层垂直结构、微环境及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 188-196. |
[2] | 郭瑞, 周际, 杨帆, 李峰. 小麦根系在碱胁迫下的生理代谢反应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(6): 683-692. |
[3] | 徐静馨, 郑有飞, 麦博儒, 赵辉, 储仲芳, 黄积庆, 袁月. 基于涡度相关法的麦田O3干沉降及不同沉降通道分配的特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(6): 670-682. |
[4] | 高林, 王晓菲, 顾行发, 田庆久, 焦俊男, 王培燕, 李丹. 植冠下土壤类型差异对遥感估算冬小麦叶面积指数的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(12): 1273-1288. |
[5] | 郑成岩, 邓艾兴, LATIFMANESHHojatollah, 宋振伟, 张俊, 王利, 张卫建. 增温对青藏高原冬小麦干物质积累转运及氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(10): 1060-1068. |
[6] | 郭瑞, 周际, 杨帆, 李峰, 李昊如, 夏旭, 刘琪. 拔节孕穗期小麦干旱胁迫下生长代谢变化规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12): 1319-1327. |
[7] | 金皖豫, 李铭, 何杨辉, 杜正刚, 邵钧炯, 张国栋, 周灵燕, 周旭辉. 不同施氮水平对冬小麦生长期土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(3): 249-257. |
[8] | 郭增江, 于振文, 石玉, 赵俊晔, 张永丽. 拔节期与开花期测墒补灌对小麦旗叶荧光特性和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 757-766. |
[9] | 熊淑萍, 王静, 王小纯, 丁世杰, 马新明. 耕作方式及施氮量对砂姜黑土区小麦氮代谢及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 767-775. |
[10] | 苏嫄, 焦菊英, 王志杰. 陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区坡沟立地环境下幼苗的存活特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 694-709. |
[11] | 师生波, 张怀刚, 师瑞, 李妙, 陈文杰, 孙亚男. 青藏高原春小麦叶片光合作用的光抑制及PSII反应中心光化学效率的恢复分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(4): 375-386. |
[12] | 黄彩霞, 柴守玺, 赵德明, 康燕霞. 灌溉对干旱区冬小麦干物质积累、分配和产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12): 1333-1344. |
[13] | 康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 王伟, 欧阳竹. 植物光合CO2响应模型对光下(暗)呼吸速率拟合的探讨[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12): 1356-1363. |
[14] | 李世莹,冯伟,王永华,王晨阳,郭天财. 宽幅播种带间距对冬小麦冠层特征及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(8): 758-767. |
[15] | 熊淑萍,张娟娟,杨阳,刘娟,王晓航,吴延鹏,马新明. 不同冬小麦品种在3种质地土壤中氮代谢特征及利用效率分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 601-610. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19