植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 64-70.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0009
收稿日期:
2005-02-02
接受日期:
2005-07-06
出版日期:
2006-02-02
发布日期:
2006-01-30
通讯作者:
高琼
作者简介:
*E-mail:gaoq@bnu.edu.cnLIU Ying-Hui, GAO Qiong*(), JIA Hai-Kun
Received:
2005-02-02
Accepted:
2005-07-06
Online:
2006-02-02
Published:
2006-01-30
Contact:
GAO Qiong
Supported by:
摘要:
在对半干旱区3种植物进行生理生态特性测定的基础上,应用两种气孔导度模型进行参数的非线性拟合,BBL模型平均可以解释77.6%的结果,Gao模型平均可以解释59.3%的结果。但Gao模型作为一个机理性的模型,其参数具有明确的物理意义。模型的行为和敏感性分析结果说明,用BBL计算的气孔导度一般大于Gao模型。BBL模型对于干旱胁迫下的土壤水分亏缺没有响应, 因而不适合用作干旱半干旱区的植物生理生态学分析和生态系统模拟。而Gao模型可以描述在各种水分条件下植物气孔导度的响应。Gao模型的结果说明,与油松 (Pinus tabulaeformis) 和中间锦鸡儿 (Caragana intermedia) 比较,小叶杨 (Populus simonii) 具有最小的抗旱和耐旱能力,油松具有最好的叶片水平的耐旱和抗旱特性,但其气孔导度对土壤水分的不敏感意味着在干旱条件下维持光合作用的同时,也可能会导致过多的水分损失。中间锦鸡儿具有很强的耐旱性,且其气孔导度对土壤水分的变化敏感,二者相结合,中间锦鸡儿可以在土壤水分条件较好的情况下,维持较大的气孔导度以满足光合作用的需要,但在土壤水分胁迫严重的时候能迅速降低气孔导度以保持土壤水分。
刘颖慧, 高琼, 贾海坤. 半干旱地区3种植物叶片水平的抗旱耐旱特性分析——两个气孔导度模型的应用和比较. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 64-70. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0009
LIU Ying-Hui, GAO Qiong, JIA Hai-Kun. LEAF-SCALE DROUGHT RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE OF THREE PLANT SPECIES IN A SEMI-ARID ENVIRONMENT: APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF TWO STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE MODELS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(1): 64-70. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0009
Species | g0 | α | D0 | R2 | F | Fc(1%) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Populus simonii | 0.074 0 | 29.99 | 0.247 1 | 0.775 | | 3.99 | ||||||||||
Pinus tabulaeformis | 0.026 5 | 196.34 | 0.019 0 | 0.736 | | 3.97 | ||||||||||
Caragana intermedia | 0.067 1 | 10.84 | 1.179 4 | 0.818 | | 3.99 |
Table 1 Nonlinear regression result for the BBL models
Species | g0 | α | D0 | R2 | F | Fc(1%) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Populus simonii | 0.074 0 | 29.99 | 0.247 1 | 0.775 | | 3.99 | ||||||||||
Pinus tabulaeformis | 0.026 5 | 196.34 | 0.019 0 | 0.736 | | 3.97 | ||||||||||
Caragana intermedia | 0.067 1 | 10.84 | 1.179 4 | 0.818 | | 3.99 |
Species | g0m | kψ | kαβ | kβg | R2 | F | Fc(1%) | β | π0 | gz |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Populus simonii | 0.77 | 0.37 | 1.19 | 253.5 | 0.627 | | 3.52 | 2.7 | -2.06 | 0.0015 |
Pinus tabulaeformis | 1.47 | 0.13 | 0.73 | 600 | 0.416 | | 3.50 | 7.4 | -10.9 | 0.0002 |
Caragana intermedia | 5.19 | 0.51 | 16.35 | 2320.9 | 0.735 | | 3.52 | 2.0 | -10.2 | 0.0002 |
Table 2 Nonlinear regression result for the model by Gao et al. (2002)
Species | g0m | kψ | kαβ | kβg | R2 | F | Fc(1%) | β | π0 | gz |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Populus simonii | 0.77 | 0.37 | 1.19 | 253.5 | 0.627 | | 3.52 | 2.7 | -2.06 | 0.0015 |
Pinus tabulaeformis | 1.47 | 0.13 | 0.73 | 600 | 0.416 | | 3.50 | 7.4 | -10.9 | 0.0002 |
Caragana intermedia | 5.19 | 0.51 | 16.35 | 2320.9 | 0.735 | | 3.52 | 2.0 | -10.2 | 0.0002 |
[1] | Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA (1987). A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggins I ed. Progress in Photosynthesis Research. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,Netherlands,221-224. |
[2] | Buckley TN, Mott KA, Farquhar GD (2003). A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26,1767-1785. |
[3] | Campbell GS, Jungbauer JD, Shiozawa S, Hungerford RD (1993). A one-parameter equation for water sorption isotherms of soils. Soil Science, 156,302-305. |
[4] |
Costa Franca MG, Pham Thi AT, Pimentel C, Pereyra Rossiello RO, Zuily-Fodil Y, Laffray D (2000). Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 43,227-237.
URL PMID |
[5] | Dewar RC (2002). The Ball-Berry-Leuning and Tardieu-Davies stomatal models: synthesis and extension within a spatially aggregated picture of guard cell function. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25,1383-1398. |
[6] | Dong X, Zhang X (2001). Some observations of the adaptations of sandy shrubs to the arid environment in the Mu Us Sandland: leaf water relations and anatomic features. Journal of Arid Environments, 48,41-48. |
[7] | Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1997). The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant,Cell and Environment, 20,142-145. |
[8] | Gao Q, Reynolds JF (2003). Historical shrub-grass transitions in the northern Chihuahuan Desert: modeling the effects of shifting rainfall seasonality and event size over a landscape gradient. Global Change Biology, 9,1475-1493. |
[9] | Gao Q, Zhang XS, Huang YM, Xu HM (2004). A comparative analysis of four models of photosynthesis for 11 plant species in the Loess Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 126,203-222. |
[10] | Gao Q, Zhao P, Zeng X, Cai X, Shen W (2002). A model of stomatal conductance to quantify the relationship between leaf transpiration, microclimate and soil water stress. Plant,Cell and Environment, 25,1373-1381. |
[11] | Giorio P, Sorrentino G, d'Andria R (1999). Stomatal behaviour, leaf water status and photosynthetic response in field-grown olive trees under water deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 42,95-104. |
[12] | Gucci R, Massai R, Xiloyannis C, Flore JA (1996). The effect of drought and vapour pressure deficit on gas exchange of young Kiwifruit ( Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa) vines. Annals of Botany, 77,605-613. |
[13] | Haefner JW, Buckley TN, Mott KA (1997). A spatially explicit model of patchy stomatal responses to humidity. Plant,Cell and Environment, 20,1087-1097. |
[14] | Leuning R (1995). A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C 3 plants. Plant, Cell and Environment, 18,339-355. |
[15] | Li YG, Jiang GM, Niu SL, Liu MZ, Peng Y, Yu SL, Gao LM (2003). Gas exchange and water use efficiency of three native tree species in Hunshandak sandland of China. Photosynthetica, 41,227-232. |
[16] | Liang JS, Zhang JH (1999). The relations of stomatal closure and reopening to xylem ABA concentration and leaf water potential during soil drying and rewatering. Plant Growth Regulation, 29,77-86. |
[17] | Liu MZ, Jiang GM, Li YG, Gao LM, Niu SL, Cui HX, Ding L (2003). Gas exchange, photochemical efficiency, and leaf water potential in three Salix species. Photosynthetica, 41,393-398. |
[18] | Monson RK, Smith SD (1982). Seasonal water potential components of Sonoran Desert (Arizona, USA) plants. Ecology, 63,113-123. |
[19] | Monteith JL (1995). A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant,Cell and Environment, 18,357-364. |
[20] | Nilsen ET, Sharifi MR, Rundel PW, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA (1983). Diurnal and seasonal water relations of the desert phreatophyte Prosopis glandulosa (honey mesquite) in the Sonoran Desert California (USA). Ecology, 64,1381-1393. |
[21] | Niu SL, Jiang GM, Li YG, Gao LM, Liu MZ, Peng Y, Ding L (2003). Comparison of photosynthetic traits between two typical shrubs: legume and non-legume in Hunshandak sandland. Photosynthetica, 41,111-116. |
[22] | Park SY, Furukawa A (1999). Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of two tropical and two temperate trees to atmospheric humidity. Photosynthetica, 36,181-186. |
[23] | Sadras VO, Milroy SP (1996). Soil water thresholds for the responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange: a review. Field Crops Research, 47,253-266. |
[24] | Tardieu F, Davies WJ (1993). Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant,Cell and Environment, 16,341-349. |
[25] | Thornley JM, Johnson IR (1990). Plant and Crop Modelling. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK. |
[26] | Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R (2003). A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26,1097-1116. |
[27] |
Turner NC, Schulze ED, Gollan T (1984). The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. I. Species comparisons at high soil water contents. Oecologia, 63,338-342.
URL PMID |
[28] | Zavala MA (2004). Integration of drought tolerance mechanisms in Mediterranean sclerophylls: a functional interpretation of leaf gas exchange simulators. Ecological Modelling, 176,211-226. |
[1] | 王嘉仪, 王襄平, 徐程扬, 夏新莉, 谢宗强, 冯飞, 樊大勇. 北京市行道树绒毛梣的水力结构对城市不透水表面比例的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 998-1009. |
[2] | 马艳泽, 杨熙来, 徐彦森, 冯兆忠. 四种常见树木叶片光合模型关键参数对臭氧浓度升高的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 321-329. |
[3] | 罗丹丹, 王传宽, 金鹰. 木本植物水力系统对干旱胁迫的响应机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 925-941. |
[4] | 叶子飘, 于冯, 安婷, 王复标, 康华靖. 植物气孔导度对CO2响应模型的构建[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 420-428. |
[5] | 陈胜楠, 陈左司南, 张志强. 北京山区油松和元宝槭冠层气孔导度特征及其环境响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1329-1340. |
[6] | 王景旭, 黄华国, 林起楠, 王冰, 黄侃. 红外热成像监测云南松切梢小蠹虫害: 针叶尺度 观测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(11): 959-968. |
[7] | 李旭华, 孙建新. Biome-BGC模型模拟阔叶红松林碳水通量的参数敏感性检验和不确定性分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(12): 1131-1144. |
[8] | 范嘉智, 王丹, 胡亚林, 景盼盼, 王朋朋, 陈吉泉. 最优气孔行为理论和气孔导度模拟[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6): 631-642. |
[9] | 安东升, 曹娟, 黄小华, 周娟, 窦美安. 基于Lake模型的叶绿素荧光参数在甘蔗苗期抗旱性研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(4): 398-406. |
[10] | 周洪华, 李卫红. 胡杨木质部水分传导对盐胁迫的响应与适应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(1): 81-91. |
[11] | 熊慧, 马承恩, 李乐, 曾辉, 郭大立. 不同生境条件下蕨类和被子植物的气孔形态特征及其对光强变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(8): 868-877. |
[12] | 邱权,潘昕,李吉跃,王军辉,马建伟,杜坤. 青藏高原20种灌木抗旱形态和生理特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 562-575. |
[13] | 刘华伟, 林晓军, 孙超, 李强, 杨呼, 郭蔼光. 接种两种固氮菌增强小麦幼苗抗渗透胁迫及生长能力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(1): 70-79. |
[14] | 李涛, 陈保冬. 丛枝菌根真菌通过上调根系及自身水孔蛋白基因表达提高玉米抗旱性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(9): 973-981. |
[15] | 鱼腾飞, 冯起, 司建华. 极端干旱区多枝柽柳叶片气孔导度的环境响应模拟[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(6): 483-490. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19