植物生态学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 457-463.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0056
黄钰辉1,2(), 官丽莉1,2, 周国逸1,*(
), 罗艳1,2, 唐建维3, 刘玉洪3
收稿日期:
2005-09-21
接受日期:
2006-03-13
出版日期:
2007-09-21
发布日期:
2007-05-30
通讯作者:
周国逸
作者简介:
* E-mail:gyzhou@scib.ac.cn基金资助:
HUANG Yu-Hui1,2(), GUAN Li-Li1,2, ZHOU Guo-Yi1,*(
), LUO Yan1,2, TANG Jian-Wei3, LIU Yu-Hong3
Received:
2005-09-21
Accepted:
2006-03-13
Online:
2007-09-21
Published:
2007-05-30
Contact:
ZHOU Guo-Yi
摘要:
测定云南西双版纳热带季节雨林和哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林优势种植物叶片及地表凋落物层的干重热值,分析并比较了两地群落类型热值的差异及其与地理条件的关系。植物叶片分为鲜叶和凋落叶,地表凋落物层分为新鲜凋落物层(L层)和腐叶层(F层)进行取样测量,所有样品在60℃烘干至恒重,样品热值采用Parr1261氧弹式热量计测量。结果表明:西双版纳的11种植物鲜叶和凋落叶干重热值的变化范围分别是14.595 3~19.863 9和14.046 7~19.884 0 kJ·g-1, L和F层的平均干重热值分别为17.419 6和14.780 5 kJ·g-1;哀牢山的10种植物鲜叶和凋落叶干重热值的变化范围分别是17.805 1~21.525 3和17.893 4~21.436 7 kJ·g-1,L和F层的平均干重热值分别为19.208 4和17.494 7 kJ·g-1。两地植物鲜叶与凋落叶干重热值的大小顺序近似或一致,即植物鲜叶干重热值越高,其凋落叶干重热值也越高;植物鲜叶与凋落叶干重热值的差值有正有负,因物种而异;西双版纳凋落物L与F层之间的热值差值显著地大于哀牢山两层凋落物的热值差值,可能是由西双版纳凋落物的分解速率较快导致的;两地样品的平均干重热值的顺序为:鲜叶>凋落叶>L层>F层;将两地的相应样品对比发现,干重热值呈现为哀牢山>西双版纳,体现出高海拔>低海拔、高纬度>低纬度以及常绿阔叶林>热带季节雨林的特点。
黄钰辉, 官丽莉, 周国逸, 罗艳, 唐建维, 刘玉洪. 西双版纳热带季节雨林和哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林优势植物及地表凋落物层的热值. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 457-463. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0056
HUANG Yu-Hui, GUAN Li-Li, ZHOU Guo-Yi, LUO Yan, TANG Jian-Wei, LIU Yu-Hong. GROSS CALORIC VALUES OF DOMINANT SPECIES AND LITTER LAYER IN MID-MONTANE MOIST EVERGREEN BROAD-LEAVED FOREST IN AILAO MOUNTAIN AND IN TROPICAL SEASON RAIN FOREST IN XISHUANGBANNA, YUNNAN, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 457-463. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0056
地点 Site | 森林类型 Forest type | 物种 Species | 鲜叶 Fresh leaf (kJ·g-1) | 凋落叶 Leaf litter (kJ·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
西双版纳 Xishuangbanna | 热带季节雨林 Tropical season rain forest | 玉蕊Barringtonia macrostachya | 19.863 9 | 19.786 9 |
番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | 19.701 7 | 19.331 6 | ||
细罗伞Ardisia tenera | 19.656 3 | 19.455 6 | ||
滇南溪桫Chisocheton siamensis | 19.165 7 | 19.884 0 | ||
窄序崖豆树Millettia leptobotrya | 18.776 6 | 18.147 5 | ||
蚁花Mezzettiopsis creaghii | 18.626 8 | 18.179 2 | ||
核实Drypetes indica | 17.780 3 | 17.692 0 | ||
白颜树Gironniera subaequalis | 17.061 0 | 15.678 0 | ||
千果榄仁Terminalia myriocarpa | 17.030 2 | 17.151 1 | ||
棒柄花Cleidion brevipetiolatum | 16.111 7 | 15.604 7 | ||
木奶果Baccaurea ramiflora | 14.595 3 | 14.046 7 | ||
平均±标准误 Mean±SE | 18.033 5±0.508 9 | 17.723 3±0.583 3 | ||
哀牢山 Ailao Mountain | 中山湿性常绿阔叶林 Mid-montone moist evergreen broad- leaved forest | 景东石栎Lithocarpus chintungensis | 21.525 3 | 21.436 7 |
绿背石栎Lithocarpus hypovirdis | 20.852 5 | 21.016 5 | ||
瓦山安息香Styrax perkinsiae | 20.821 6 | 20.784 7 | ||
木果石栎Lithocarpus xylocarpus | 20.482 2 | 20.703 8 | ||
长尾青冈 Cyclobalanopsis stewardiana var. longicaudata | 20.435 3 | 20.243 0 | ||
滇木荷Schima noronhae | 20.408 4 | - | ||
腾冲栲Castanopsis wattii | 19.788 1 | 19.952 7 | ||
红花木莲Manglietia insignis | 19.526 7 | - | ||
多花含笑Michelia floribunda | 19.241 9 | 18.666 9 | ||
舟柄茶Hartia sinensis | 17.805 1 | 17.893 4 | ||
平均±标准误 Mean±SE | 20.088 7±0.331 7 | 20.087 2±0.431 4 |
表1 鲜叶与凋落叶的热值
Table 1 The gross caloric value (GCV) of fresh leaf and leaf litter
地点 Site | 森林类型 Forest type | 物种 Species | 鲜叶 Fresh leaf (kJ·g-1) | 凋落叶 Leaf litter (kJ·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
西双版纳 Xishuangbanna | 热带季节雨林 Tropical season rain forest | 玉蕊Barringtonia macrostachya | 19.863 9 | 19.786 9 |
番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | 19.701 7 | 19.331 6 | ||
细罗伞Ardisia tenera | 19.656 3 | 19.455 6 | ||
滇南溪桫Chisocheton siamensis | 19.165 7 | 19.884 0 | ||
窄序崖豆树Millettia leptobotrya | 18.776 6 | 18.147 5 | ||
蚁花Mezzettiopsis creaghii | 18.626 8 | 18.179 2 | ||
核实Drypetes indica | 17.780 3 | 17.692 0 | ||
白颜树Gironniera subaequalis | 17.061 0 | 15.678 0 | ||
千果榄仁Terminalia myriocarpa | 17.030 2 | 17.151 1 | ||
棒柄花Cleidion brevipetiolatum | 16.111 7 | 15.604 7 | ||
木奶果Baccaurea ramiflora | 14.595 3 | 14.046 7 | ||
平均±标准误 Mean±SE | 18.033 5±0.508 9 | 17.723 3±0.583 3 | ||
哀牢山 Ailao Mountain | 中山湿性常绿阔叶林 Mid-montone moist evergreen broad- leaved forest | 景东石栎Lithocarpus chintungensis | 21.525 3 | 21.436 7 |
绿背石栎Lithocarpus hypovirdis | 20.852 5 | 21.016 5 | ||
瓦山安息香Styrax perkinsiae | 20.821 6 | 20.784 7 | ||
木果石栎Lithocarpus xylocarpus | 20.482 2 | 20.703 8 | ||
长尾青冈 Cyclobalanopsis stewardiana var. longicaudata | 20.435 3 | 20.243 0 | ||
滇木荷Schima noronhae | 20.408 4 | - | ||
腾冲栲Castanopsis wattii | 19.788 1 | 19.952 7 | ||
红花木莲Manglietia insignis | 19.526 7 | - | ||
多花含笑Michelia floribunda | 19.241 9 | 18.666 9 | ||
舟柄茶Hartia sinensis | 17.805 1 | 17.893 4 | ||
平均±标准误 Mean±SE | 20.088 7±0.331 7 | 20.087 2±0.431 4 |
图1 西双版纳热带季节雨林植物鲜叶和凋落叶的热值差值
Fig.1 The difference of gross caloric value (GCV) between freshleaves and leaf litters of plants in the tropical season rain forest in Xishuangbanna 1.白颜树 Gironniera subaequalis 2.窄序崖豆树 Millettia leptobotrya 3.木奶果 Baccaurea ramiflora 4.棒柄花 Cleidion brevipetiolatum 5.蚁花 Mezzettiopsis creaghii 6.番龙眼 Pometia tomentosa 7.细罗伞 Ardisia tenera 8.核实 Drypetes indica 9.玉蕊Barringtonia recemosa 10.千果榄仁 Terminalia myriocarpa 11.滇南溪桫 Chisocheton siamensis
图2 哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林植物鲜叶与凋落叶热值的差值
Fig.2 The difference of gross caloric value (GCV) between fresh leaves and leaf litters of plants in the mid-montone moist evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountain 1.多花含笑 Michelia floribunda 2.长尾青冈 Cyclobalanopsis stewardiana var. longicaudata 3.景东石栎 Lithocarpus chintungensis 4.瓦山安息香 Styrax perkinsiae 5.舟柄茶 Hartia sinensis 6.绿背石栎 Lithocarpus hypovirdis 7.腾冲栲 Castanopsis wattii 8.木果石栎 Lithocarpus xylocarpus
地点 Site | 样方 Samples | L层 L layer (kJ·g-1) | F层 F layer (kJ·g-1) | L与F层热值差值 Difference of GCV between L and F layer (kJ·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
西双版纳 Xishuangbanna | X1 | 18.567 6 | 14.942 7 | 3.624 9 |
X2 | 16.210 0 | 13.124 3 | 3.085 7 | |
X3 | 18.216 8 | 14.578 1 | 3.638 7 | |
X4 | 17.880 1 | 15.744 4 | 2.135 7 | |
X5 | 17.523 5 | 15.024 0 | 2.499 5 | |
X6 | 16.909 5 | 15.922 5 | 0.987 1 | |
X7 | 16.834 9 | 11.799 7 | 5.035 2 | |
X8 | 15.875 7 | 14.702 4 | 1.173 3 | |
X9 | 18.758 2 | 17.186 4 | 1.571 8 | |
平均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 17.419 6±0.341 9 | 14.780 5±0.524 2 | 2.6391±0.444 1 | |
哀牢山 Ailao Mountain | A1 | 19.492 9 | 17.437 7 | 2.055 2 |
A2 | 18.771 1 | 16.370 6 | 2.400 5 | |
A3 | 19.338 2 | 18.152 6 | 1.185 6 | |
A4 | 18.208 3 | 16.250 6 | 1.957 7 | |
A5 | 19.005 0 | 17.547 2 | 1.457 9 | |
A6 | 19.143 8 | 17.472 6 | 1.671 3 | |
A7 | 19.645 5 | 18.195 9 | 1.449 6 | |
A8 | 20.062 4 | 18.530 8 | 1.531 7 | |
平均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 19.208 4±0.200 7 | 17.494 7±0.293 2 | 1.713 6±0.139 9 |
表2 新鲜凋落物层(L层)与腐叶层(F层)的热值及两者间热值差值
Table 2 The gross caloric value (GCV) of fresh litter layer (L) and fermentation layer (F) and the difference between L and F layer
地点 Site | 样方 Samples | L层 L layer (kJ·g-1) | F层 F layer (kJ·g-1) | L与F层热值差值 Difference of GCV between L and F layer (kJ·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
西双版纳 Xishuangbanna | X1 | 18.567 6 | 14.942 7 | 3.624 9 |
X2 | 16.210 0 | 13.124 3 | 3.085 7 | |
X3 | 18.216 8 | 14.578 1 | 3.638 7 | |
X4 | 17.880 1 | 15.744 4 | 2.135 7 | |
X5 | 17.523 5 | 15.024 0 | 2.499 5 | |
X6 | 16.909 5 | 15.922 5 | 0.987 1 | |
X7 | 16.834 9 | 11.799 7 | 5.035 2 | |
X8 | 15.875 7 | 14.702 4 | 1.173 3 | |
X9 | 18.758 2 | 17.186 4 | 1.571 8 | |
平均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 17.419 6±0.341 9 | 14.780 5±0.524 2 | 2.6391±0.444 1 | |
哀牢山 Ailao Mountain | A1 | 19.492 9 | 17.437 7 | 2.055 2 |
A2 | 18.771 1 | 16.370 6 | 2.400 5 | |
A3 | 19.338 2 | 18.152 6 | 1.185 6 | |
A4 | 18.208 3 | 16.250 6 | 1.957 7 | |
A5 | 19.005 0 | 17.547 2 | 1.457 9 | |
A6 | 19.143 8 | 17.472 6 | 1.671 3 | |
A7 | 19.645 5 | 18.195 9 | 1.449 6 | |
A8 | 20.062 4 | 18.530 8 | 1.531 7 | |
平均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 19.208 4±0.200 7 | 17.494 7±0.293 2 | 1.713 6±0.139 9 |
图3 西双版纳和哀牢山样品平均热值的比较(误差线表示标准误)
Fig.3 Comparison on average gross caloric value (GCV) of samples in Xishuangbanna and in Ailao Mountain (error bars represent standard error) A.鲜叶Fresh leaf B.凋落叶Leaf litter C.L层L layer D.F层F layer
[1] | Bliss LC (1962). Caloric and lipid content in alpine tundra plants. Ecology, 43, 753-757. |
[2] | Fan HQ(范航清), Lin P(林鹏)(1994). Studies on detritus energy during the decomposition of Kandelia candel leaf litter. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 36, 305-311. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] |
Golley FB (1969). Caloric of wet tropical forest vegetation. Ecology, 50, 517-519.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Golley FB (1961). Energy values of ecological materials. Ecology, 42, 581-584.
DOI URL |
[5] |
Hadley EB, Bliss LC(1964). Energy relationships of alpine plants of Mt. Washington, New Hampshire. Ecological Monographs, 34, 331-357.
DOI URL |
[6] | Hughes MK (1971). Seasonal calorific values form a deciduous woodland in England. Ecology, 52, 923-926. |
[7] | Jordan CF (1971). Productivity of a tropical forest and its relation to a world pattern of energy storage. Journal of Ecology, 59, 127-142. |
[8] | Lin P(林鹏), Lin GH(林光辉)(1991). Study on the caloric value and ash content of some mangrove species in China. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学学报), 15, 114-120. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Lin P(林鹏), Shao C(邵成), Zheng WJ(郑文教)(1996). Study on the caloric values of dominating plants in a subtropical rain forest in Hexi of Fujian. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 20, 303-309. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Lin YM(林益明), Lin P(林鹏), Wang T(王通) (2000). Caloric values and ash contents of some mangrove woods. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 11, 181-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Liu WY(刘文耀), Xie SC(谢寿昌), Xie KJ(谢克金), Yang GP(杨国平)(1995). Preliminary studies on the litterfall and coarse woody debris in mid-mountain humid evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountains. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 37, 807-814. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Ren H(任海), Peng SL(彭少麟), Liu HX(刘鸿先), Cao HL(曹洪麟), Huang ZL(黄忠良)(1999). The caloric value of main plant species at Dinghushan, Guangdong, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23, 148-154. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Ren YH(任泳红), Cao M(曹敏), Tang JW(唐建维), Tang Y(唐勇), Zhang JH(张建侯)(1999). A comparative study on litterfall dynamics in a seasonal forest and a rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23, 418-425. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Sun GF(孙国夫), Zheng ZM(郑志明), Wang ZQ(王兆骞)(1993). Dynamic of caloric values of rice. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 12(1), 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Wu ZY(吴征镒), Qu ZX(曲仲湘), Jiang HQ(姜汉侨) (1983). Research of Forest Ecosystem on Ailao Mountains, Yunnan (云南哀牢山森林生态系统研究). Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Xu YR(徐永荣), Feng ZW(冯宗炜), Zhu JE(朱敬恩)(2004). Comparison of foliage caloric values of garden plants in Wuhan and Tianjin, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 23(6), 11-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Yang FT(杨福囤), He HJ(何海菊)(1983). A preliminary study on caloric of common plants in alpine meadow. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学丛刊), 7, 280-288. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Yi L(易兰), You WH(由文辉), Song YC(宋永昌) (2005). Soil animal communities in the litter of the evergreen broad-leaved forest at five succession stages in Tiantong. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 466-473. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Zhang QH(张清海), Ye GF(叶功富), Lin YM(林益明)(2005). Dynamic caloric value of Casuarina equisetifolia litter fall during decomposition on coast sandy land. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 18, 455-459. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Zhang SC (张世聪), Xu Y (徐跃)(1990). The mineral-element content of litterfall in a Lithocarpus xylocarpus forest in the Ailao Mountains. Journal of Southwest Forestry College (西南林学院学报), 10, 161-167. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Zheng Z(郑征), Liu LH(刘伦辉), He AJ(和爱军), Jing GF(荆桂芬)(1990). Litterfall and leaf consumption by animals in humid seasonal rainforest in Xishuangbanna, China. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 32, 551-557. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zu YG(祖元刚) (1990). Introduction to Energy Ecology (能量生态学引论). Jilin Science and Technology Press, Changchun. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 吴君梅, 曾泉鑫, 梅孔灿, 林惠瑛, 谢欢, 刘苑苑, 徐建国, 陈岳民. 土壤磷有效性调控亚热带森林土壤酶活性和酶化学计量对凋落叶输入的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 242-253. |
[2] | 陈昭铨, 王明慧, 胡子涵, 郎学东, 何云琼, 刘万德. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林幼苗的群落构建机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 68-79. |
[3] | 仲琦, 李曾燕, 马炜, 况雨潇, 邱岭军, 黎蕴洁, 涂利华. 氮添加和凋落物处理对华西雨屏区常绿阔叶林凋落叶分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 629-643. |
[4] | 何春梅, 李雨姗, 尹秋龙, 贾仕宏, 郝占庆. 秦岭皇冠暖温性落叶阔叶林优势树种的径级结构和数量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1658-1667. |
[5] | 张景慧, 王铮, 黄永梅, 陈慧颖, 李智勇, 梁存柱. 草地利用方式对温性典型草原优势种植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 818-833. |
[6] | 吴秋霞, 吴福忠, 胡仪, 康自佳, 张耀艺, 杨静, 岳楷, 倪祥银, 杨玉盛. 亚热带同质园11个树种新老叶非结构性碳水化合物含量比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(7): 771-779. |
[7] | 袁锋, 王艳艳, 李茂瑾, 江传阳, 刘贺娜, 李坤玲, 洪滔, 吴承祯, 陈灿. 不同海岸距离上木麻黄凋落叶金属元素含量及归还量动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 819-827. |
[8] | 李颖, 龚吉蕊, 刘敏, 侯向阳, 丁勇, 杨波, 张子荷, 王彪, 朱趁趁. 不同放牧强度下内蒙古温带典型草原优势种植物防御策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 642-653. |
[9] | 陈思路, 蔡劲松, 林成芳, 宋豪威, 杨玉盛. 亚热带不同树种凋落叶分解对氮添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3): 214-227. |
[10] | 梅孔灿, 程蕾, 张秋芳, 林开淼, 周嘉聪, 曾泉鑫, 吴玥, 徐建国, 周锦容, 陈岳民. 不同植物来源可溶性有机质对亚热带森林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1273-1284. |
[11] | 陈文静, 贡璐, 刘雨桐. 季节性雪被对天山雪岭云杉凋落叶分解和碳氮磷释放的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4): 487-497. |
[12] | 万菁娟, 郭剑芬, 纪淑蓉, 任卫岭, 司友涛, 杨玉盛. 不同来源可溶性有机物对亚热带森林土壤CO2排放的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(7): 674-681. |
[13] | 倪祥银,杨万勤,李晗,徐李亚,何洁,吴福忠. 雪被斑块对川西亚高山森林6种凋落叶冬季腐殖化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 540-549. |
[14] | 唐仕姗,杨万勤,殷睿,熊莉,王海鹏,王滨,张艳,彭艳君,陈青松,徐振锋. 中国森林生态系统凋落叶分解速率的分布特征及其控制因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 529-539. |
[15] | 田文文,王卫,陈安磊,李裕元,李雁勇,谢小立. 红壤稻田弃耕后植被和土壤有机碳对积水与火烧的早期响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6): 626-634. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19