冬小麦叶片气孔导度模型水分响应函数的参数化

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00463

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植物气孔导度模型的水分响应函数用来模拟水分胁迫对气孔导度的影响过程, 是模拟缺水环境下植物与大气间水、碳交换过程的关键算法。水分响应函数包括空气湿度响应函数和土壤湿度(或植物水势)响应函数, 该研究基于田间实验观测, 分析了冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)叶片气孔导度对不同空气饱和差和不同土壤体积含水量或叶水势的响应规律。一个土壤水分梯度的田间处理在中国科学院禹城综合试验站实施, 不同水分胁迫下的冬小麦叶片气体交换过程和气孔导度以及其他的温湿度数据被观测, 同时观测了土壤含水量和叶水势。实验数据表明, 冬小麦叶片气孔导度对空气饱和差的响应呈现双曲线规律, 变化趋势显示大约1 kPa空气饱和差是一个有用的阈值, 在小于1 kPa时, 冬小麦气孔导度对空气饱和差变化反应敏感, 而大于1 kPa后则反应缓慢; 分析土壤体积含水量与中午叶片气孔导度的关系发现, 中午叶片气孔导度随土壤含水量增加大致呈现线性增加趋势, 但在平均土壤体积含水量大于大约25%以后, 气孔导度不再明显增加, 而是维持在较高导度值上下波动; 冬小麦中午叶片水势与相应的气孔导度之间, 随着叶水势的增加, 气孔导度呈现增加趋势。根据冬小麦气孔导度对空气湿度、土壤湿度和叶水势的响应规律, 研究分别采用双曲线和幂指数形式拟合了水汽响应函数, 用三段线性方程拟合了土壤湿度响应函数和植物水势响应函数, 得到的参数可以为模型模拟冬小麦的各类水、热、碳交换过程采用。

关键词: 气孔导度模型, 冬小麦, 水分响应函数

Abstract:

Aims Water response functions in leaf stomatal conductance models are used to simulate the effects of water stress on stomatal conductance. Especially under a water-limited environment, the water response function is a critical method for modeling gas exchange between plant and air. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) is an important crop grown under water-limited environment in North China. Our objective is to determine the responses of stomatal conductance of winter wheat to vapor humidity, soil water content and leaf water potential and to determine the appropriate water response functions for winter wheat in North China based on field experiments.
Methods Field experiments were carried out at Yucheng Comprehensive Station. Eight water treatment plots were set up to produce different degrees of water stress on winter wheat. Leaf gas exchange and stomatal conductance were measured, along with other environmental and water factors. We analyzed relationships between leaf stomatal conductance and air vapor humidity, soil water content and leaf water potential.
Important findings Leaf stomatal conductance of winter wheat decreased with increasing air vapor pressure deficit (VPD). About 1 kPa in VPD is a valuable threshold value for winter wheat. When VPD is <1 kPa, leaf stomatal conductance decreases rapidly with increasing VPD. But when VPD is >1 kPa, leaf stomatal conductance decreases slightly even with a large VPD increase. A hyperbolic function can simulate the response of stomatal conductance of winter wheat to VPD. Midday leaf stomatal conductance linearly increases when soil water content increases, but the maximum threshold is about 25% of mean soil water volumetric contents, above which leaf stomatal conductance fluctuates in high conductance and does not show a simple increasing trend. A similar relationship between midday leaf stomatal conductance and soil water content occurs between midday leaf water potential and midday leaf stomatal conductance, where the maximum threshold in midday leaf water potential is about -1 MPa when the leaf stomatal conductance becomes relatively stable. We obtained the vapor humidity response function for winter wheat in hyperbolic and power exponent forms based on our field experimental data by data-fitting methods. We also obtained the soil water content response function and leaf water potential response function in simple linear form. These water response functions are useful for the application on modelling surface processes for winter wheat, especially in North China.

Key words: stomatal conductance model, Triticum aestivum, water response function

袁国富, 庄伟, 罗毅. 冬小麦叶片气孔导度模型水分响应函数的参数化. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(5): 463-470. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00463

YUAN Guo-Fu, ZHUANG Wei, LUO Yi. Parameterization of water response functions in leaf stomatal conductance model for winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(5): 463-470. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00463

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00463

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2012/V36/I5/463

图/表 5

表1 不同土壤水分处理的灌水量与灌溉日期

Table 1 Irrigation amount and date under different soil water treatments

小区 Plot	灌溉日期(儒略日) Day of year for irrigation	灌水量 Irrigation amount (mm)
A1, A2, A3, A4	-	0
B1	101, 117	143
B2	110	72
B3	117, 136	89
B4	86, 101, 117, 136	179

图1 冬小麦气孔导度对空气饱和水汽压差的响应特征。

Fig. 1 Response of stomatal conductance to air vapor pressure deficit for winter wheat.

表2 冬小麦气孔导度模型不同形式水分响应函数参数

Table 2 Parameters of different water response functions in stomatal conductance model for winter wheat

参数 Parameter	a	D₀(kPa)	α	β	m	ψ_max(MPa)	ψ_min(MPa)
参数值 Parameter value	59.35	0.012	0.73	-0.92	0.96	-1.0	-3.2
样本数 n	181		181		33	53
R²	0.681 0		0.678 5		0.635 1	0.247 7

图2 0-60 cm土层平均土壤体积含水量对冬小麦中午叶片气孔导度的影响。

Fig. 2 Effect of mean soil water volumetric content in 0-60 cm soil depth on midday leaf stomatal conductance for winter wheat. gs, actual stomatal conductance; gsmax, maximum stomatal conductance.

图3 冬小麦中午叶水势对叶片气孔导度的影响。

Fig. 3 Effect of midday leaf water potential on leaf stomatal conductance for winter wheat. gs, actual stomatal conductance; gsmax, maximum stomatal conductance.

参考文献 25

[1]	Ball MC, Farquhar GD (1984). Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of two mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, to long term salinity and humidity conditions. Plant Physiology, 74, 1-6. DOI URL PMID
[2]	Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Grivet C, Berry JA (1991). Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 54, 107-136.
[3]	Daly E, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2004). Coupled dynamics of photosynthesis, transpiration, and soil water balance. Part I: upscaling from hourly to daily level. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5, 546-558.
[4]	Damour G, Simonneau T, Cochard H, Urban L (2010). An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33, 1419-1438. URL PMID
[5]	Dewar RC (2002). The Ball-Berry-Leuning and Tardieu- Davies stomatal models: synthesis and extension within a spatially aggregated picture of guard cell function. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25, 1383-1398.
[6]	Egea G, Verhoef A, Vidale PL (2011). Towards an improved and more flexible representation of water stress in coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151, 1370-1384.
[7]	Grant RF, Flanagan LB (2007). Modeling stomatal and nonstomatal effects of water deficits on CO₂ fixation in a semiarid grassland. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(G3), G03011, doi: 10.1029/2006JG000- 302.
[8]	Jones HG, Sutherland RA (1991). Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant, Cell & Environment, 14, 607-612.
[9]	Kimball JS, Thornton PE, White MA, Running SW (1997). Simulating forest productivity and surface-atmosphere carbon exchange in the BOREAS study region. Tree Physiology, 17, 589-599. DOI URL PMID
[10]	Kramer PJ (1983). Water Relations of Plants. Academic Press, New York. 55-75.
[11]	Leuning R (1995). A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C₃ plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 18, 339-355.
[12]	Li YX (李永秀), Lou YS (娄运生), Zhang FC (张富存) (2011). Comparison of stomatal conductance models for winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 32, 106-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Luo Y, Ouyang Z, Yuan G, Tang D, Xie X (2003). Evaluation of macroscopic root water uptake models using lysimeter data. Transactions of the ASAE, 46, 625-634.
[14]	Mo XG, Beven K (2004). Multi-objective parameter conditioning of a three-source wheat canopy model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 122, 39-63.
[15]	Stewart JB (1988). Modelling surface conductance of pine forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 43, 19-35.
[16]	Tang DY (唐登银), Luo Y (罗毅), Yu Q (于强) (2000). Fundamentals of agricultural water saving. Irrigation and Drainage (灌溉排水), 19(2), 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Turner NC, Schulze ED, Gollan T (1984). The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content I. Species comparisons at high water contents. Oecologia, 63, 338-342. URL PMID
[18]	Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R (2003). A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1097-1116.
[19]	van Wijk MT, Dekker SC, Bouten W, Bosveld FC, Kohsiek W, Kramer K, Mohren GMJ (2000). Modeling daily gas exchange of a Douglas-fir forest: comparison of three stomatal conductance models with and without a soil water stress function. Tree Physiology, 20, 115-122.
[20]	Wang J, Yu Q, Li J, Li LH, Li XG, Sun XM, Yu GR (2006). Simulation of diurnal variations of CO₂, water and heat fluxes over winter wheat with a model coupled photosynthesis and transpiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 137, 194-219.
[21]	Wang S, Grant RF, Verseghy DL, Black TA (2001). Modelling plant carbon and nitrogen dynamics of a boreal aspen forest in CLASS-the Canadian land surface scheme. Ecological Modelling, 142, 135-154.
[22]	Wang SF (王淑芬), Zhang XY (张喜英), Pei D (裴冬) (2006). Impacts of different water supplied conditions on root distribution, yield and water utilization efficiency of winter wheat. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (中国农业工程学报), 22, 27-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Wang SS, Yan Y, Trishchenko AP, Barr AG, Black TA, McCaughey H (2009). Modeling the response of canopy stomatal conductance to humidity. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 10, 521-532.
[24]	Wang YP, Leuning R (1998). A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I. Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 91, 89-111.
[25]	Yu Q, Xu SH, Wang J, Lee XH (2007). Influence of leaf water potential on diurnal changes in CO₂ and water vapour fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 124, 161-181.