高寒草地植物生存策略地理分布特征及其影响因素

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2022.0123

植物生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 41-50.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0123 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2022.0123

所属专题：青藏高原植物生态学：种群生态学；草原与草业

高寒草地植物生存策略地理分布特征及其影响因素

林马震¹^,², 黄勇¹^,^*(), 李洋³, 孙建²^,^*()

¹云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院, 昆明 650091
²中国科学院青藏高原研究所青藏高原地球系统与资源环境国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
³内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院, 呼和浩特 010011

收稿日期:2022-04-07 接受日期:2022-07-05 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2022-08-20
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0405);第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0307);国家自然科学基金(41871040)

Geographical distribution characteristics and influencing factors of plant survival strategies in an alpine grassland

LIN Ma-Zhen¹^,², HUANG Yong¹^,^*(), LI Yang³, SUN Jian²^,^*()

¹Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
²State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
³College of Grassland, Resource and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China

Received:2022-04-07 Accepted:2022-07-05 Online:2023-01-20 Published:2022-08-20
Supported by:
Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program of China(2019QZKK0405);Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program of China(2019QZKK0307);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871040)

1. 附录高寒草地植物叶片采集信息和CSR值.xlsx(30KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植物性状能够反映植物的生存策略, 是植物生态学的研究热点之一。植物CSR策略模型将植物物种分为3类: 在资源丰富环境中能够最大程度提高生物量的物种(竞争型物种: C策略); 在干扰频率较高的环境中能够快速摄取资源并繁殖的物种(投机取巧型物种: R策略); 在资源贫瘠环境中能够保持个体生存的物种(耐受型物种: S策略)。植物叶片性状对环境梯度具有适应性的改变, 性状的改变对植物生存策略产生影响, 但是青藏高原植物叶片性状是如何影响植物CSR生存策略的, 其机制尚不清楚。该研究探究了高寒草地植物CSR生存策略的分布特征, 以及环境因子对CSR生存策略的影响机制。2020年7-8月, 对青藏高原高寒草地53个样点进行了调查, 测定植物叶片叶面积、叶片鲜质量和叶片干质量等性状, 并计算C、S、R值。然后, 分析关键地理环境要素对植物CSR策略影响的主要因子和作用机理。结果表明: (1)在青藏高原高寒草地, 植物的生存策略主要以S策略(41.6%-96.7%)为主。(2)随着经度的增加, 青藏高原高寒草地C策略植物所占比例自西向东逐渐上升; 在海拔梯度上, 高寒草地C策略植物所占比例随着海拔的升高而降低。(3)随机森林分析结果显示降水量对C策略的贡献率最高(25.74%), 海拔对S策略的贡献率最高(27.34%); 分析气候因子对植物性状的影响发现降水量和温度只对叶面积产生显著影响, 且叶片含水量对植物C、S策略具有显著效应。综合而言, 研究发现降水量是影响植物CSR生存策略最关键的因子, 这对于研究高寒草地植物对环境梯度的生态适应具有十分重要的意义。

关键词: CSR策略, 叶片性状, 环境梯度, 青藏高原, 高寒草地

Abstract:

Aims Vegetation traits are one of the research hotspots in plant ecology and they reflect the strategies of plant survival. According to the CSR survival strategy model, plant species may be classified into three categories: C strategy that can maximize biomass in resource-rich environments (competitive species); R strategy that can rapidly intake resources and reproduce in environments with a high frequency of disturbance (opportunistic species); and S strategy that can maintain individual survival in resource-poor environments (tolerant species). Leaf traits have adaptive changes in response to environmental gradients, which have impacts on plant adaptation. The mechanisms of how leaf traits affect CSR survival strategies in the alpine grassland of Qingzang Plateau remain unclear. The objective of this paper is to investigate the spatial patterns of CSR survival strategies of alpine plants and the mechanisms by which environmental factors influence plant survival.
Methods We surveyed a field transect which consists of 53 sample sites in an alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau from July to August 2020. Vegetation traits of leaf area, leaf fresh mass, and leaf dry mass were measured and C, S, R values were calculated. Finally, we analyzed the critical drivers and mechanism of plant CSR strategies in response to geographical elements.
Important findings Our results showed that: (1) In the alpine grassland of the Qingzang Plateau, 41.6%-96.7% of plants are identified as S strategy. (2) With the increase of the longitude, the proportion of C strategy plants increased gradually from the west to the east, whereas along the altitude gradient, the proportion of C strategy plants decreased with the increasing altitude. (3) Random forest analysis showed that the contribution of precipitation to C strategy is the highest (25.74%), and the contribution of altitude to S strategy is the highest (27.34%). Additionally, both precipitation and temperature had significant effects on leaf area, and leaf water content significantly affects plant CSR strategies. In summary, results of our study highlighted that precipitation is the most critical factor that governs plant CSR survival strategies. This finding has important implications for studying the ecological adaptation along environmental gradients in alpine grasslands.

Key words: CSR strategy, leaf trait, environmental gradient, Qingzang Plateau, alpine grassland

林马震, 黄勇, 李洋, 孙建. 高寒草地植物生存策略地理分布特征及其影响因素. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 41-50. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0123

LIN Ma-Zhen, HUANG Yong, LI Yang, SUN Jian. Geographical distribution characteristics and influencing factors of plant survival strategies in an alpine grassland. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, 47(1): 41-50. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0123

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2022.0123

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2023/V47/I1/41

图/表 8

图1 青藏高原地形图和高寒草地采样点。

Fig. 1 Location of alpine grassland sample sites and the landscape topography of Qingzang Plateau.

图2 青藏高原高寒草地常见植物的CSR策略图。C, 竞争型; S, 忍受型; R, 投机取巧型。圆圈大小代表叶片干物质含量。

Fig. 2 CSR strategy of common species in alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau. C, competitor; S, stress-tolerator; R, ruderal. Size of the circle represents the leaf dry matter content.

图3 青藏高原高寒草地常见植物C策略(A)和S策略(B)与各环境因子的相关性热度图。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01。AI, 干旱指数; Alt, 海拔; C, 竞争型; Lat, 纬度; Lon, 经度; Pre, 降水量; S, 忍受型; Tem, 温度。

Fig. 3 Heat map of the correlation between C (A) and S (B) strategies and environmental factors in alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01. AI, aridity index; Alt, altitude; C, competitor; Lat, latitude; Lon, longitude; Pre, precipitation; S, stress-tolerator; Tem, temperature.

图4 青藏高原高寒草地环境因子对C策略(A)、S策略(B)的相对重要性分析。AI, 干旱指数; Alt, 海拔; C, 竞争型; Lat, 纬度; Lon, 经度; Pre, 降水量; S, 忍受型; Tem, 温度。

Fig. 4 Relative importance of effect of environmental factors on C (A) and S (B) strategies in alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau. AI, aridity index; Alt, altitude; C, competitor; Lat, latitude; Lon, longitude; Pre, precipitation; S, stress-tolerator; Tem, temperature.

图5 青藏高原高寒草地海拔(A)、降水量(B)、经度(C)、温度(D)对C策略的影响。C, 竞争型。

Fig. 5 Effects of altitude (A), precipitation (B), longitude (C), temperature (D) on C-strategy in alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau. C, competitor.

图6 青藏高原高寒草地海拔(A)、经度(B)、温度(C)对S策略的影响。S, 忍受型。

Fig. 6 Effects of altitude (A), longitude (B), temperature (C) on S-strategy in alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau. S, stress-tolerator.

图7 青藏高原高寒草地经度对降水量(A)和海拔对温度(B)的影响。

Fig. 7 Effects of longitude on precipitation (A) and altitude on temperature (B) in the alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau.

图8 青藏高原高寒草地植物C、S策略分别与叶面积(A、B)和叶片含水量(C、D)以及叶面积与降水量(E)和温度(F)之间的相关性分析。C, 竞争型; S, 忍受型。

Fig. 8 Correlation analysis of C and S strategies on leaf area (A, B) and leaf water content (C, D), respectively, and leaf area on precipitation (E) and temperature (F) in the alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau. C, competitor; S, stress-tolerator.

参考文献 40

[1]	Behroozian M, Ejtehadi H, Memariani F, Pierce S, Mesdaghi M (2020). Are endemic species necessarily ecological specialists? Functional variability and niche differentiation of two threatened Dianthus species in the montane steppes of northeastern Iran. Scientific Reports, 10, 11774. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68618-7. DOI
[2]	Caccianiga M, Luzzaro A, Pierce S, Ceriani RM, Cerabolini B (2006). The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification. Oikos, 112, 10-20. DOI URL
[3]	Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Swenson NG, Zanne AE (2009). Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecology Letters, 12, 351-366. DOI PMID
[4]	Chen L (2015). Response of Leaf Traits at Species and Functional Group Levels to Simulated Nitrogen Deposition and Precipitation Additions in a Stipa baicalensis Meadow Steppe. Master degree dissertation, Northeast Normal University, Changchun.
	[ 陈利 (2015). 贝加尔针茅草甸草原主要植物与功能群的叶片性状对增氮增雨的响应. 硕士学位论文, 东北师范大学, 长春.]
[5]	Cross EL, Green PT, Morgan JW (2015). A plant strategy approach to understand multidecadal change in community assembly processes in Australian grassy woodlands. Journal of Ecology, 103, 1300-1307. DOI URL
[6]	Davison J, García de León D, Zobel M, Moora M, Bueno CG, Barceló M, Gerz M, León D, Meng YM, Pillar VD, Sepp SK, Soudzilovaskaia NA, Tedersoo L, Vaessen S, Vahter T, et al. (2020). Plant functional groups associate with distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. New Phytologist, 226, 1117-1128. DOI PMID
[7]	Ferré C, Caccianiga M, Zanzottera M, Comolli R (2020). Soil-plant interactions in a pasture of the Italian Alps. Journal of Plant Interactions, 15, 39-49. DOI URL
[8]	Garnier E, Laurent G, Bellmann A, Debain S, Berthelier P, Ducout B, Roumet C, Navas ML (2001). Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. New Phytologist, 152, 69-83. DOI PMID
[9]	Godoy O, Valladares F, Castro-Díez P (2011). Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity. Functional Ecology, 25, 1248-1259. DOI URL
[10]	Grime JP (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist, 111, 1221-1226. DOI URL
[11]	He NP, Li Y, Liu CC, Xu L, Li MX, Zhang JH, He JS, Tang ZY, Han XG, Ye Q, Xiao CW, Yu Q, Liu SR, Sun W, Niu SL, et al. (2020). Plant trait networks: improved resolution of the dimensionality of adaptation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35, 908-918. DOI URL
[12]	Holmgren M, Pooter L (2007). Does a ruderal strategy dominate the endemic flora of the West African forests? Journal of Biogeography, 34, 1100-1111. DOI URL
[13]	Li Y, Wang Y, Han GD, Sun J, Wang YF (2022). Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels and their controlling factors in alpine grassland, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 31, 50-60.
	[ 李洋, 王毅, 韩国栋, 孙建, 汪亚峰 (2022). 青藏高原高寒草地土壤微生物量碳氮含量特征及其控制要素. 草业学报, 31, 50-60.]
[14]	Li YH, Lu Q, Wu B, Zhu YJ, Liu DJ, Zhang JX, Jin ZH (2012). A review of leaf morphology plasticity linked to plant response and adaptation characteristics in arid ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 88-98. DOI URL
	[ 李永华, 卢琦, 吴波, 朱雅娟, 刘殿君, 张金鑫, 靳占虎 (2012). 干旱区叶片形态特征与植物响应和适应的关系. 植物生态学报, 36, 88-98.] DOI
[15]	Li YZ, Shipley B (2017). An experimental test of CSR theory using a globally calibrated ordination method. PLOS ONE, 12, e0175404. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175404. DOI
[16]	Liao HX, Li DJ, Zhou T, Huang B, Zhang HJ, Chen BM, Peng SL (2021). The role of functional strategies in global plant distribution. Ecography, 44, 493-503. DOI URL
[17]	Ma BB, Sun J, Zhu JT, Luo GX (2018). Carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry of plant community and its influencing factors in a northern Tibet alpine grassland. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37, 1026-1036.
	[ 马百兵, 孙建, 朱军涛, 罗广祥 (2018). 藏北高寒草地植物群落C、N化学计量特征及其影响因素. 生态学杂志, 37, 1026-1036.]
[18]	Ma JY, Fang XW, Xia DS, Duan ZH, Chen FH, Wang G (2008). Correlations between meteorological factors and leaf element contents in desert plant Reaumuria soongorica. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32, 848-857.
	[ 马剑英, 方向文, 夏敦胜, 段争虎, 陈发虎, 王刚 (2008). 荒漠植物红砂叶片元素含量与气候因子的关系. 植物生态学报, 32, 848-857.] DOI
[19]	Matos IS, Eller CB, Oliveras I, Mantuano D, Rosado BHP (2021). Three eco-physiological strategies of response to drought maintain the form and function of a tropical montane grassland. Journal of Ecology, 109, 327-341. DOI URL
[20]	Nastos PT, Politi N, Kapsomenakis J (2013). Spatial and temporal variability of the Aridity Index in Greece. Atmospheric Research, 119, 140-152. DOI URL
[21]	Piao SL, Fang JY, He JS, Xiao Y (2004). Spatial distribution of grassland biomass in China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28, 491-498.
	[ 朴世龙, 方精云, 贺金生, 肖玉 (2004). 中国草地植被生物量及其空间分布格局. 植物生态学报, 28, 491-498.] DOI
[22]	Pierce S, Negreiros D, Cerabolini BEL, Kattge J, Díaz S, Kleyer M, Shipley B, Wright SJ, Soudzilovskaia NA, Onipchenko VG, van Bodegom PM, Frenette-Dussault C, Weiher E, Pinho BX, Cornelissen JHC, et al. (2017). A global method for calculating plant CSR ecological strategies applied across biomes world-wide. Functional Ecology, 31, 444-457. DOI URL
[23]	Quan Q, Tian DS, Luo YQ, Zhang FY, Crowther TW, Zhu K, Chen HYH, Zhou QP, Niu SL (2019). Water scaling of ecosystem carbon cycle feedback to climate warming. Science Advances, 5, eaav1131. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav1131. DOI
[24]	Reich PB (2014). The world-wide “fast-slow” plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology, 102, 275-301. DOI URL
[25]	Sun J, Liu GH (2021). Alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau: pattern and process. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45, 429-433. DOI URL
	[ 孙建, 刘国华 (2021). 青藏高原高寒草地: 格局与过程. 植物生态学报, 45, 429-433.]
[26]	Sun J, Liu M, Fu BJ, Kemp D, Zhao WW, Liu GH, Han GD, Wilkes A, Lu XY, Chen YC, Cheng GW, Zhou TC, Hou G, Zhan TY, Peng F, et al. (2020b). Reconsidering the efficiency of grazing exclusion using fences on the Tibetan Plateau. Science Bulletin, 65, 1405-1414. DOI URL
[27]	Sun J, Wang Y, Liu GH (2021). Linkages of aboveground plant carbon accumulation rate with ecosystem multifunctionality in alpine grassland, Qingzang Plateau. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45, 496-506. DOI URL
	[ 孙建, 王毅, 刘国华 (2021). 青藏高原高寒草地地上植物碳积累速率对生态系统多功能性的影响机制. 植物生态学报, 45, 496-506.]
[28]	Sun J, Zhou TC, Liu M, Chen YC, Liu GH, Xu M, Shi PL, Peng F, Tsunekawa A, Liu Y, Wang XD, Dong SK, Zhang YJ, Li YN (2020a). Water and heat availability are drivers of the aboveground plant carbon accumulation rate in alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29, 50-64. DOI URL
[29]	Timmermann A, Damgaard C, Strandberg MT, Svenning JC (2015). Pervasive early 21st-century vegetation changes across Danish semi-natural ecosystems: more losers than winners and a shift towards competitive, tall-growing species. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 21-30. DOI URL
[30]	Wang CS, Wang SP (2015). A review of research on responses of leaf traits to climate change. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 206-216. DOI URL
	[ 王常顺, 汪诗平 (2015). 植物叶片性状对气候变化的响应研究进展. 植物生态学报, 39, 206-216.] DOI
[31]	Wang RL, Yu GR, He NP, Wang QF, Zhao N, Xu ZW (2016). Altitudinal variation in the covariation of stomatal traits with leaf functional traits in Changbai Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 2175-2184.
	[ 王瑞丽, 于贵瑞, 何念鹏, 王秋凤, 赵宁, 徐志伟 (2016). 气孔特征与叶片功能性状之间关联性沿海拔梯度的变化规律——以长白山为例. 生态学报, 36, 2175-2184.]
[32]	Wang XD, Cheng GW, Zhao T, Zhang XZ, Zhu LP, Huang L (2017). Assessment on protection and construction of ecological safety shelter for Tibet. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32, 29-34.
	[ 王小丹, 程根伟, 赵涛, 张宪洲, 朱立平, 黄麟 (2017). 西藏生态安全屏障保护与建设成效评估. 中国科学院院刊, 32, 29-34.]
[33]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, et al. (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827. DOI
[34]	Yang B, Wang JC, Zhang YB (2010). Effect of long-term warming on growth and biomass allocation of Abies faxoniana seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 5994-6000.
	[ 杨兵, 王进闯, 张远彬 (2010). 长期模拟增温对岷江冷杉幼苗生长与生物量分配的影响. 生态学报, 30, 5994-6000.]
[35]	Yang DC, Hu L, Song XY, Wang CT (2021). Effects of changing precipitation on litter quality and decomposition of different plant functional groups in an alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45, 1314-1328. DOI URL
	[ 杨德春, 胡雷, 宋小艳, 王长庭 (2021). 降雨变化对高寒草甸不同植物功能群凋落物质量及其分解的影响. 植物生态学报, 45, 1314-1328.] DOI
[36]	Yang JH, Li YN, Bu HY, Zhang ST, Qi W (2019). Response of leaf traits of common broad-leaved woody plants to environmental factors on the eastern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 43, 863-876. DOI URL
	[ 杨继鸿, 李亚楠, 卜海燕, 张世挺, 齐威 (2019). 青藏高原东缘常见阔叶木本植物叶片性状对环境因子的响应. 植物生态学报, 43, 863-876.] DOI
[37]	Zheng D, Zhao DS (2017). Characteristics of natural environment of the Tibetan Plateau. Science & Technology Review, 35(6), 13-22.
	[ 郑度, 赵东升 (2017). 青藏高原的自然环境特征. 科技导报, 35(6), 13-22.]
[38]	Zhou TC, Hou G, Sun J, Zong N, Shi PL (2021a). Degradation shifts plant communities from S- to R-strategy in an alpine meadow, Tibetan Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 800, 149572. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149572. DOI
[39]	Zhou TC, Sun J, Liu M, Shi PL, Zhang XB, Sun W, Yang G, Tsunekawa A (2020). Coupling between plant nitrogen and phosphorus along water and heat gradients in alpine grassland. Science of the Total Environment, 701, 134660. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134660. DOI
[40]	Zhou TC, Sun J, Shi PL (2021b). Plant-microbe interactions regulate the aboveground community nitrogen accumulation rate in different environmental conditions on the Tibetan Plateau. Catena, 204, 105407. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105407. DOI

高寒草地植物生存策略地理分布特征及其影响因素

Geographical distribution characteristics and influencing factors of plant survival strategies in an alpine grassland

全文

PDF (PC)

附录附件

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张安宁, 肖亚宁, 赵霞, 张淼, 崔瀚文, 陈书燕, 安黎哲. 青藏高原灌木化与氮添加对土壤线虫及功能性状的交互作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[2]	谭聪, 石亮, 赵常提, 甘沛钦, 陈冰瑞, 谭深, 卜燕华, 田地. 基于叶片功能性状多维特征的北京平原林生态优化策略解析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 388-399.
[3]	张永军, 李敬东, 安琦, 洪翎桂, 任正炜, 张蕊, 周小龙. 氮添加和增温对天山高寒草地群落性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 417-428.
[4]	吕卫东, 董全民, 孙彩彩, 刘文亭, 刘玉祯, 张振祥, 李梦棋, 杨晓霞. 牦牛和藏羊放牧对高寒草地植物和微生物碳氮库的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1424-1433.
[5]	陈龙, 郭柯, 勾晓华, 赵秀海, 马泓若. 祁连圆柏林群落组成及特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 852-864.
[6]	王世松, 曲孝云, 董劭琼, 李佳鸿, 杨琦, 侯满福, 赵利清, 郭柯, 刘长成, 胥晓. 西藏札达典型荒漠植被类型及群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 801-812.
[7]	王娟, 张登山, 肖元明, 裴全帮, 王博, 樊博, 周国英. 长期围封后高寒草原植物根系分泌物特征与环境因子关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 596-609.
[8]	董金龙, 邓云, 张文富, 袁盛东, 岩光, 陈典, 郭贤明, 刘峰, 林露湘. 西双版纳热带森林的藤本攀附比率及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 1973-1990.
[9]	陈诚智, 高钰森, 罗力嘉, 王东. 川西高寒窄叶鲜卑花灌丛凋落枝和凋落叶生产与分解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1733-1743.
[10]	王麟, 李雪, 王愉, 王新, 胡小文, 杨梅, 朱剑霄. 不同配方种衣剂对高寒草地乡土草种种子生长与建植的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 118-128.
[11]	牛亚平, 高晓霞, 姚世庭, 杨元合, 彭云峰. 退化高寒草地植物多样性和功能群组成与地上生产力的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 83-92.
[12]	王雯莹, 肖元明, 王小赟, 徐嘉昕, 马玉花, 李强峰, 周国英. 多功能群物种配置模式下退化高寒草甸植物多样性与生态系统多功能性的关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 103-117.
[13]	张辉, 赵赟鹏, 刘晓琛, 郭增鹏, 胡国瑞, 冯彦皓, 马妙君. 高寒草甸退化过程中土壤种子库的变化及其在植物群落更新中的潜在作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 74-82.
[14]	徐铭泽, 赵洪贤, 李成, 李满乐, 田赟, 刘鹏, 查天山. 季节尺度毛乌素沙地黑沙蒿的叶片性状网络特征及驱动因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(12): 1650-1665.
[15]	李昀奕, 郑矜, 严晓艳, 李霜, 罗林, 童晋, 赵春章. 云杉和华西箭竹叶际与根际细菌群落对增温的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(12): 1692-1707.