植物生态学报

• •    

牦牛和藏羊放牧对高寒草地植物和微生物碳氮库权衡的影响

吕卫东1,董全民2,孙彩彩1,刘文亭2,刘玉祯2,张振祥1,李梦棋1,杨晓霞2   

  1. 1. 青海大学畜牧兽医科学院
    2. 青海大学
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-02 修回日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-04-17

The impact of Yak and Tibetan sheep grazing on the trade-off between plant and microbial carbon and nitrogen pools in alpine grasslands

wei dong lv1,Dong Quanmin2,Cai cai Sun3, 1,Liu Yuzhen2,zhen xiang 张4,meng qi li4,Yang Xiaoxia2   

  1. 1.
    2. Qinghai University
    3. Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Science and Veterinary Medicine Qinghai University
    4. Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Science,
  • Received:2025-01-02 Revised:2025-03-25

摘要: 摘要:高寒草地作为全球生态系统的重要组成部分,对气候变化和人类活动尤为敏感。植物和微生物碳氮库是草地生态系统碳氮库的重要组成部分。放牧作为高寒草地主要利用方式之一,直接决定了植物与土壤微生物对碳、氮资源的分配、储存与利用。通过在青海省海北州西海镇设置不同放牧方式试验,即:牦牛单独放牧(YG),藏羊单独放牧(SG),牦牛藏羊1:2混合放牧(MG1:2),牦牛藏羊1:4混合放牧(MG1:4),牦牛藏羊1:6混合放牧(MG1:6)和不放牧处理(CK)。试验结果发现,在碳库方面,牦牛、藏羊单独放牧显著降低了植物群落碳库,却不影响微生物生物量碳库;混合放牧同样降低植物群落碳库,但显著增加了微生物生物量碳库。对氮库而言,单独放牧时植物群落氮库无变化,微生物生物量氮库显著增加;混合放牧则显著减少植物群落氮库,而微生物生物量氮库不受影响。对植物和微生物碳氮库的权衡研究发现:在未放牧以及牦牛、藏羊单独放牧的情境下,碳氮库的权衡偏向于植物群落;而在混合放牧条件下,MG1:2和MG1:4的权衡倾向于微生物生物量碳库,MG1:6则倾向于微生物氮库。以上结果表明,放牧可能是通过采食植物地上部分来调节植物体内的碳含量,这一变化进一步影响了植物群落碳库与微生物生物量碳库之间的权衡状态。同时,放牧通过采食促进植物再生增加了植物群落氮含量,改变了植物群落氮库与微生物生物量氮库之间的权衡关系。

关键词: 放牧, 高寒草地, 碳库, 氮库, 权衡

Abstract: Aims: As an important part of the global ecosystem, alpine grasslands are especially sensitive to climate change and human activities. The carbon and nitrogen pools of plants and microorganisms are significant components of the carbon and nitrogen pools in grassland ecosystems. Grazing, as one of the main utilization ways of alpine grasslands, directly determines the distribution, storage and utilization of carbon and nitrogen resources by plants and soil microorganisms. Methods By setting up experiments with different grazing methods in Xihai Town, Haibei Prefecture, Qinghai Province, i.e., Yak grazing alone (YG), Tibetan sheep grazing alone (SG), Yak-Tibetan sheep 1:2 mixed grazing (MG1:2), Yak-Tibetan sheep 1:4 mixed grazing (MG1:4), Yak-Tibetan sheep 1:6 mixed grazing (MG1:6), and no-grazing treatment (CK). Important findings In terms of carbon pools, separate grazing by yaks and Tibetan sheep significantly reduced the carbon pool of the plant community, but did not affect the microbial biomass carbon pool. Mixed grazing also reduced the carbon pool of the plant community, yet significantly increased the microbial biomass carbon pool. Regarding nitrogen pools, when grazing separately, the nitrogen pool of the plant community remained unchanged, while the microbial biomass nitrogen pool increased significantly. Under mixed grazing conditions, the nitrogen pool of the plant community was significantly reduced, and the microbial biomass nitrogen pool was not affected. Studies on the trade-offs between plant and microbial carbon and nitrogen pools found that in the situations of no grazing and separate grazing by yaks and Tibetan sheep, the trade-off of carbon and nitrogen pools favored the plant community. Under mixed grazing conditions, the trade-offs of MG1:2 and MG1:4 were inclined to the microbial biomass carbon pool, and that of MG1:6 was inclined to the microbial nitrogen pool. The above results indicate that grazing may regulate the carbon content in plants by consuming the above-ground parts of plants. This change further affects the trade-off state between the carbon pool of the plant community and the microbial biomass carbon pool. Meanwhile, grazing promotes plant regeneration through consumption, increases the nitrogen content of the plant community, and changes the trade-off relationship between the nitrogen pool of the plant community and the microbial biomass nitrogen pool.

Key words: grazing, alpine grassland, carbon pool, nitrogen pool, trade-off