植物生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 55-69.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0417
收稿日期:2024-11-22
接受日期:2025-02-26
出版日期:2026-01-20
发布日期:2026-02-13
通讯作者:
*徐小牛(xnxu2007@ahau.edu.cn)基金资助:
DAI Yun-Ze1,2, YAO Liang-Jin3, CHEN Miao4, XU Xiao-Niu2,*(
)
Received:2024-11-22
Accepted:2025-02-26
Online:2026-01-20
Published:2026-02-13
Contact:
*XU Xiao-Niu (xnxu2007@ahau.edu.cn)Supported by:摘要:
近代工农业发展引起的生态系统活性氮(N)和磷(P)输入可以通过影响土壤团聚体结构及其稳定性, 改变土壤储碳(C)能力。目前, 亚热带地区还缺少关于模拟N、P沉降对土壤团聚体影响的观测研究, 且较少关注P沉降与N沉降的相互作用。为了探明生态系统N富集及其与P沉降相互作用如何影响土壤团聚体固碳机制, 在中国南方亚热带森林中进行了连续7年的N、P添加实验, 实验设计了对照(CK, 0 kg N·hm-2·a-1)、低氮添加(LN, 50 kg N·hm-2·a-1)、氮添加(NA, 100 kg N·hm-2·a-1)、氮磷添加(N+P, 100 kg N·hm-2·a-1 + 50 kg P·hm-2·a-1) 4个处理, 测定了土壤性质、土壤团聚体及其C、N含量和各粒级团聚体C、N稳定同位素组成。结果表明, 常绿阔叶林大团聚体(直径>250 μm)是土壤优势粒级, 占土壤总质量的83%-87%, LN处理增加大团聚体形成和平均质量直径、平均几何直径, 而NA和N+P处理小幅降低土壤团聚体稳定性。该地区N富集主要通过提高各粒级团聚体C、N浓度来增加团聚体C、N含量, 增加的有机质主要富集在大团聚体中。大团聚体主要增加高C:N、富13C的有机质。相比于低N添加, 过量的N输入不利于土壤团聚体结构稳定及其C固存。在N添加条件下, 添加P并未显著改变该地区团聚体稳定性及其碳氮含量。N、P添加下, 常绿阔叶林土壤C、N、P总含量对土壤团聚体形成没有促进作用, 而土壤pH的显著降低对团聚体C、N含量增加有显著的促进意义。该研究结果提高了对常绿阔叶林团聚体变化机制的了解, 从而对预测未来N、P沉降下常绿阔叶林和其他条件相似地区的土壤C汇潜力有重要参考价值。
戴允泽, 姚良锦, 陈淼, 徐小牛. 氮磷添加对常绿阔叶林土壤团聚体稳定性及其碳氮含量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 55-69. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0417
DAI Yun-Ze, YAO Liang-Jin, CHEN Miao, XU Xiao-Niu. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on the stability of soil aggregates and their carbon and nitrogen contents in evergreen broadleaf forests. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2026, 50(1): 55-69. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0417
图1 氮磷添加下的土壤理化性质(平均值±标准差)。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。CK, 对照; LN, 低氮添加; NA, 氮添加; N+P, 氮磷添加。DOC, 可溶性有机碳含量; DON, 可溶性有机氮含量; MBC, 土壤微生物生物量碳含量; MBN, 土壤微生物生物量氮含量; SOC, 土壤有机碳含量; STN, 土壤全氮含量; TP, 土壤全磷含量。
Fig. 1 Soil physicochemical properties under nitrogen and phosphorus addition (mean ± SD). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). CK, control check; LN, low nitrogen addition; NA, nitrogen addition; N+P, nitrogen and phosphorus addition. DOC, dissolved organic carbon content; DON, dissolved organic nitrogen content; MBC, soil microbial biomass carbon content; MBN, soil microbial biomass nitrogen content; SOC, soil organic carbon content; STN, soil total nitrogen content; TP, soil total phosphorus content.
| 指标 Index | LN | NA | N+P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | F | p | |
| 大团聚体质量百分比 Macroaggregate mass percentage | 1.29 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.33 | 0.57 |
| 微团聚体质量百分比 Microaggregate mass percentage | 1.04 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.89 |
| 粉黏粒质量百分比 Silt + clay mass percentage | 1.24 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.91 | 0.36 |
| MWD | 1.30 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.34 | 0.57 |
| GMD | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.48 |
| 大团聚体碳(C)浓度 Macroaggregate carbon concentration | 18.95 | <0.01** | 10.12 | <0.01** | 4.28 | 0.06 |
| 微团聚体C浓度 Microaggregate carbon concentration | 19.24 | <0.01** | 16.34 | <0.01** | 4.43 | 0.05 |
| 粉黏粒C浓度 Silt + clay carbon concentration | 12.12 | <0.01** | 6.07 | 0.03* | 5.21 | 0.04* |
| 大团聚体氮(N)浓度 Macroaggregate nitrogen concentration | 10.15 | <0.01** | 4.70 | 0.04* | 2.37 | 0.14 |
| 微团聚体N浓度 Microaggregate nitrogen concentration | 13.71 | <0.01** | 5.33 | 0.03* | 2.69 | 0.12 |
| 粉黏粒N浓度 Silt + clay nitrogen concentration | 7.60 | 0.01* | 1.78 | 0.20 | 3.79 | 0.07 |
| 大团聚体SOC:STN Macroaggregate SOC:STN | 9.42 | <0.01** | 31.80 | <0.01** | 6.59 | 0.02* |
| 微团聚体SOC:STN Microaggregate SOC:STN | 0.72 | 0.41 | 7.20 | 0.02* | 2.48 | 0.14 |
| 粉黏粒SOC:STN Silt + clay SOC:STN | 0 | 0.99 | 2.40 | 0.14 | 0.69 | 0.42 |
| 大团聚体C含量 Macroaggregate carbon content | 21.48 | <0.01** | 13.84 | <0.01** | 4.05 | 0.06 |
| 微团聚体C含量 Microaggregate carbon content | 2.02 | 0.17 | 3.74 | 0.07 | 2.94 | 0.11 |
| 粉黏粒C含量 Silt + clay carbon content | 1.59 | 0.23 | 4.34 | 0.05 | 3.80 | 0.07 |
| 大团聚体N含量 Macroaggregate nitrogen content | 11.82 | <0.01** | 5.93 | 0.03 | 1.96 | 0.18 |
| 微团聚体N含量 Microaggregate nitrogen content | 1.28 | 0.28 | 2.02 | 0.18 | 1.92 | 0.19 |
| 粉黏粒N含量 Silt + clay nitrogen content | 1.10 | 0.31 | 2.66 | 0.12 | 3.53 | 0.08 |
| 大团聚体δ13C Macroaggregate δ13C | 1.98 | 0.14 | 1.98 | 0.14 | 1.98 | 0.14 |
| 微团聚体δ13C Microaggregate δ13C | 6.84 | <0.01** | 6.84 | <0.01** | 6.84 | <0.01** |
| 粉黏粒δ13C Silt + clay δ13C | 2.92 | 0.04* | 2.92 | 0.04* | 2.92 | 0.04* |
| 大团聚体δ15N Macroaggregate δ15N | 13.89 | <0.01** | 13.89 | <0.01** | 13.89 | <0.01** |
| 微团聚体δ15N Microaggregate δ15N | 1.70 | 0.19 | 1.70 | 0.19 | 1.70 | 0.19 |
| 粉黏粒δ15N Silt + clay δ15N | 4.72 | <0.01** | 4.72 | <0.01** | 4.72 | <0.01** |
表1 土壤团聚体组分方差分析
Table 1 ANOVA of soil aggregate fractions
| 指标 Index | LN | NA | N+P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | F | p | |
| 大团聚体质量百分比 Macroaggregate mass percentage | 1.29 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.33 | 0.57 |
| 微团聚体质量百分比 Microaggregate mass percentage | 1.04 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.89 |
| 粉黏粒质量百分比 Silt + clay mass percentage | 1.24 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.91 | 0.36 |
| MWD | 1.30 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.34 | 0.57 |
| GMD | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.48 |
| 大团聚体碳(C)浓度 Macroaggregate carbon concentration | 18.95 | <0.01** | 10.12 | <0.01** | 4.28 | 0.06 |
| 微团聚体C浓度 Microaggregate carbon concentration | 19.24 | <0.01** | 16.34 | <0.01** | 4.43 | 0.05 |
| 粉黏粒C浓度 Silt + clay carbon concentration | 12.12 | <0.01** | 6.07 | 0.03* | 5.21 | 0.04* |
| 大团聚体氮(N)浓度 Macroaggregate nitrogen concentration | 10.15 | <0.01** | 4.70 | 0.04* | 2.37 | 0.14 |
| 微团聚体N浓度 Microaggregate nitrogen concentration | 13.71 | <0.01** | 5.33 | 0.03* | 2.69 | 0.12 |
| 粉黏粒N浓度 Silt + clay nitrogen concentration | 7.60 | 0.01* | 1.78 | 0.20 | 3.79 | 0.07 |
| 大团聚体SOC:STN Macroaggregate SOC:STN | 9.42 | <0.01** | 31.80 | <0.01** | 6.59 | 0.02* |
| 微团聚体SOC:STN Microaggregate SOC:STN | 0.72 | 0.41 | 7.20 | 0.02* | 2.48 | 0.14 |
| 粉黏粒SOC:STN Silt + clay SOC:STN | 0 | 0.99 | 2.40 | 0.14 | 0.69 | 0.42 |
| 大团聚体C含量 Macroaggregate carbon content | 21.48 | <0.01** | 13.84 | <0.01** | 4.05 | 0.06 |
| 微团聚体C含量 Microaggregate carbon content | 2.02 | 0.17 | 3.74 | 0.07 | 2.94 | 0.11 |
| 粉黏粒C含量 Silt + clay carbon content | 1.59 | 0.23 | 4.34 | 0.05 | 3.80 | 0.07 |
| 大团聚体N含量 Macroaggregate nitrogen content | 11.82 | <0.01** | 5.93 | 0.03 | 1.96 | 0.18 |
| 微团聚体N含量 Microaggregate nitrogen content | 1.28 | 0.28 | 2.02 | 0.18 | 1.92 | 0.19 |
| 粉黏粒N含量 Silt + clay nitrogen content | 1.10 | 0.31 | 2.66 | 0.12 | 3.53 | 0.08 |
| 大团聚体δ13C Macroaggregate δ13C | 1.98 | 0.14 | 1.98 | 0.14 | 1.98 | 0.14 |
| 微团聚体δ13C Microaggregate δ13C | 6.84 | <0.01** | 6.84 | <0.01** | 6.84 | <0.01** |
| 粉黏粒δ13C Silt + clay δ13C | 2.92 | 0.04* | 2.92 | 0.04* | 2.92 | 0.04* |
| 大团聚体δ15N Macroaggregate δ15N | 13.89 | <0.01** | 13.89 | <0.01** | 13.89 | <0.01** |
| 微团聚体δ15N Microaggregate δ15N | 1.70 | 0.19 | 1.70 | 0.19 | 1.70 | 0.19 |
| 粉黏粒δ15N Silt + clay δ15N | 4.72 | <0.01** | 4.72 | <0.01** | 4.72 | <0.01** |
图2 氮磷添加下土壤团聚体分布变化(平均值±标准差)。CK, 对照; LN, 低氮添加; NA, 氮添加; N+P, 氮磷添加。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 2 Changes in the distribution of soil aggregates under nitrogen and phosphorus addition (mean ± SD). CK, control check; LN, low nitrogen addition; NA, nitrogen addition; N+P, nitrogen and phosphorus addition. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
图3 氮磷添加对土壤团聚体平均质量直径(MWD)、平均几何直径(GMD)的影响(平均值±标准差)。CK, 对照; LN, 低氮添加; NA, 氮添加; N+P, 氮磷添加。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 3 Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil aggregates (mean ± SD). CK, control check; LN, low nitrogen addition; NA, nitrogen addition; N+P, nitrogen and phosphorus addition. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
图4 氮磷添加下土壤团聚体碳、氮浓度变化(平均值±标准差)。CK, 对照; LN, 低氮添加; NA, 氮添加; N+P, 氮磷添加。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 4 Changes in carbon and nitrogen concentrations in soil aggregates under nitrogen and phosphorus addition (mean ± SD). CK, control check; LN, low nitrogen addition; NA, nitrogen addition; N+P, nitrogen and phosphorus addition. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
图5 氮磷添加下土壤团聚体碳氮比变化(平均值±标准差)。CK, 对照; LN, 低氮添加; NA, 氮添加; N+P, 氮磷添加。SOC, 土壤有机碳含量; STN, 土壤全氮含量。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 5 Changes in carbon to nitrogen ratio of soil aggregates under nitrogen and phosphorus addition (mean ± SD). CK, control check; LN, low nitrogen addition; NA, nitrogen addition; N+P, nitrogen and phosphorus addition. SOC, soil organic carbon content; STN, soil total nitrogen content. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
图6 氮磷添加下土壤团聚体碳、氮含量变化(平均值±标准差)。CK, 对照; LN, 低氮添加; NA, 氮添加; N+P, 氮磷添加。不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 6 Changes in carbon and nitrogen content of soil aggregates under nitrogen and phosphorus addition (mean ± SD). CK, control check; LN, low nitrogen addition; NA, nitrogen addition; N+P, nitrogen and phosphorus addition. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
| 处理 Treatment | 大团聚体δ13C Macroaggregate δ13C | 微团聚体δ13C Microaggregate δ13C | 粉黏粒δ13C Silt + clay δ13C | 大团聚体δ15N Macroaggregate δ15N | 微团聚体δ15N Microaggregate δ15N | 粉黏粒δ15N Silt + clay δ15N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | -27.71 ± 1.92b | -27.85 ± 0.04a | -30.80 ± 4.47a | -24.65 ± 10.18a | -10.96 ± 4.84a | -5.19 ± 0.86a |
| LN | -26.27 ± 0.46a | -31.11 ± 1.68b | -34.16 ± 6.37a | -47.04 ± 5.67c | -11.33 ± 5.55a | -5.73 ± 0.64b |
| NA | -26.88 ± 1.80ab | -29.65 ± 1.37b | -54.83 ± 37.96b | -33.55 ± 9.85b | -8.88 ± 1.15a | -4.67 ± 0.43a |
| N+P | -26.46 ± 0.52ab | -30.85 ± 2.63b | -33.65 ± 3.82a | -41.03 ± 3.13c | -7.79 ± 2.12a | -5.19 ± 0.30ab |
表2 氮磷添加下土壤团聚体同位素变化(平均值±标准差, ‰)
Table 2 Isotopic changes in soil aggregates under nitrogen and phosphorus addition (mean ± SD, ‰)
| 处理 Treatment | 大团聚体δ13C Macroaggregate δ13C | 微团聚体δ13C Microaggregate δ13C | 粉黏粒δ13C Silt + clay δ13C | 大团聚体δ15N Macroaggregate δ15N | 微团聚体δ15N Microaggregate δ15N | 粉黏粒δ15N Silt + clay δ15N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | -27.71 ± 1.92b | -27.85 ± 0.04a | -30.80 ± 4.47a | -24.65 ± 10.18a | -10.96 ± 4.84a | -5.19 ± 0.86a |
| LN | -26.27 ± 0.46a | -31.11 ± 1.68b | -34.16 ± 6.37a | -47.04 ± 5.67c | -11.33 ± 5.55a | -5.73 ± 0.64b |
| NA | -26.88 ± 1.80ab | -29.65 ± 1.37b | -54.83 ± 37.96b | -33.55 ± 9.85b | -8.88 ± 1.15a | -4.67 ± 0.43a |
| N+P | -26.46 ± 0.52ab | -30.85 ± 2.63b | -33.65 ± 3.82a | -41.03 ± 3.13c | -7.79 ± 2.12a | -5.19 ± 0.30ab |
图7 土壤团聚体组分与环境因子相关性分析(A)和土壤团聚体分布及其碳氮浓度变化对土壤碳氮稳定性的影响(B)。DOC, 可溶性有机碳含量; DON, 可溶性有机氮含量; GMD, 平均几何直径; MBC, 土壤微生物生物量碳含量; MBN, 土壤微生物生物量氮含量; MAC-δ13C, 大团聚体13C同位素比值(δ13C); ; MAC-δ15N, 大团聚体15N同位素比值(δ15N); MAC-content, 大团聚体含量; MAC-SOC:STN, 大团聚体SOC:STN; MACC-concentration, 大团聚体碳浓度; MACC-content, 大团聚体碳含量; MANC-concentration, 大团聚体氮浓度; MANC-content, 大团聚体氮含量; MIC-δ13C, 微团聚体δ13C; MIC-δ15N, 微团聚体δ15N; MIC-content, 微团聚体含量; MIC-SOC:STN, 微团聚体SOC:STN; MICC-concentration, 微团聚体碳浓度; MICC-content, 微团聚体碳含量; MINC-concentration, 微团聚体氮浓度; MINC-content, 微团聚体氮含量; MWD, 平均质量直径; SC-δ13C, 粉黏粒δ13C; SC-δ15N, 粉黏粒δ15N; SC-content, 粉黏粒含量; SC-SOC:STN, 粉黏粒SOC:STN; SCC-concentration, 粉黏粒碳浓度; SCC-content, 粉黏粒碳含量; SMC, 土壤含水量; SNC-concentration, 粉黏粒氮浓度; SNC-content, 粉黏粒氮含量; SOC, 土壤有机碳含量; STN, 土壤全氮含量; TP, 土壤全磷含量。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001。
Fig. 7 Correlation analysis between soil aggregate fractions and environmental factors (A), and effect of soil aggregate distribution and its carbon, nitrogen concentration changes on soil carbon and nitrogen stability (B). DOC, dissolved organic carbon content; DON, dissolved organic nitrogen content; GMD, geometric mean diameter; MBC, soil microbial biomass carbon content; MBN, soil microbial biomass nitrogen content; MAC-δ13C, macroaggregate 13C isotope ratio (δ13C); MAC-δ15N, macroaggregate 15N isotope ratio (δ15N); MAC-content, macroaggregate content; MAC-SOC:STN, macroaggregate SOC:STN; MACC-concentration, macroaggregate carbon concentration; MACC-content, macroaggregate carbon content; MANC-concentration, macroaggregate nitrogen concentration; MANC-content, macroaggregate nitrogen content; MIC-δ13C, microaggregate δ13C; MIC-δ15N, microaggregate δ15N; MIC-content, microaggregate content; MIC-SOC:STN, microaggregate SOC:STN; MICC-concentration, microaggregate carbon concentration; MICC-content, microaggregate carbon content; MINC-concentration, microaggregate nitrogen concentration; MINC-content, microaggregate nitrogen content; MWD, mean weight diameter; SC-δ13C, silt + clay δ13C; SC-δ15N, silt + clay δ15N; SC-content, silt + clay content; SC-SOC:STN, silt + clay SOC:STN; SCC-concentration, silt + clay carbon concentration; SCC-content, silt + clay carbon content; SMC, soil moisture content; SNC-concentration, silt + clay nitrogen concentration; SNC-content, silt + clay nitrogen content; SOC, soil organic carbon content; STN, soil total nitrogen content; TP, soil total phosphorus content. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
| [1] |
Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005). Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma, 124, 3-22.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Cadisch G, Imhof H, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM, Giller KE (1996). Carbon turnover (δ13C) and nitrogen mineralization potential of particulate light soil organic matter after rainforest clearing. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28, 1555-1567.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Cambardella CA, Elliott ET (1993). Carbon and nitrogen distribution in aggregates from cultivated and native grassland soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 1071-1076.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Chang RY, Zhou WJ, Fang YT, Bing HJ, Sun XY, Wang GX (2019). Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition increases soil carbon by enhancing new carbon of the soil aggregate formation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 124, 572-584.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Chaplot V, Cooper M (2015). Soil aggregate stability to predict organic carbon outputs from soils. Geoderma, 243-244, 205-213.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Chen H, Li D, Feng W, Niu S, Plante A, Luo Y, Wang K (2018). Different responses of soil organic carbon fractions to additions of nitrogen. European Journal of Soil Science, 69, 1098-1104.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
Chen ZJ, Geng SC, Zhang JH, Setälä H, Gu Y, Wang F, Zhang X, Wang XX, Han SJ (2017). Addition of nitrogen enhances stability of soil organic matter in a temperate forest. European Journal of Soil Science, 68, 189-199.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Chen ZJ, Zhou XY, Geng SC, Miao Y, Cao YH, Chen Z, Zhang JH, Han SJ (2019). Interactive effect of nitrogen addition and throughfall reduction decreases soil aggregate stability through reducing biological binding agents. Forest Ecology and Management, 445, 13-19.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
Cheng SL, Fang HJ, Yu GR (2018). Threshold responses of soil organic carbon concentration and composition to multi-level nitrogen addition in a temperate needle-broadleaved forest. Biogeochemistry, 137, 219-233.
DOI |
| [10] | Du JX, Liu KL, Huang J, Han TF, Zhang L, Anthonio CK, Shah A, Khan MN, Qaswar M, Abbas M, Huang QH, Xu YM, Zhang HM (2022). Organic carbon distribution and soil aggregate stability in response to long-term phosphorus addition in different land-use types. Soil and Tillage Research, 215, 105195. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105195. |
| [11] | Duan Y, Chen L, Zhang JB, Li DM, Han XR, Zhu B, Li Y, Zhao BJ, Huang P (2021). Long-term fertilisation reveals close associations between soil organic carbon composition and microbial traits at aggregate scales. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 306, 107169. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107169. |
| [12] |
Fang HJ, Yu GR, Cheng SL, Mo JM, Yan JH, Li SG (2009). 13C abundance, water-soluble and microbial biomass carbon as potential indicators of soil organic carbon dynamics in subtropical forests at different successional stages and subject to different nitrogen loads. Plant and Soil, 320, 243-254.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Fang XM, Zhang XL, Chen FS, Zong YY, Bu WS, Wan SZ, Luo YQ, Wang HM (2019). Phosphorus addition alters the response of soil organic carbon decomposition to nitrogen deposition in a subtropical forest. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 133, 119-128.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
Gao Y, Jia YL, Yu GR, He NP, Zhang L, Zhu B, Wang YF (2019). Anthropogenic reactive nitrogen deposition and associated nutrient limitation effect on gross primary productivity in inland water of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 530-540.
DOI URL |
| [15] | IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2013). Climate change 2013:the physical science basis//Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. |
| [16] |
Leifheit EF, Veresoglou SD, Lehmann A, Morris EK, Rillig MC (2014). Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation—A meta-analysis. Plant and Soil, 374, 523-537.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Lu XF, Hou EQ, Guo JY, Gilliam FS, Li JL, Tang SB, Kuang YW (2021). Nitrogen addition stimulates soil aggregation and enhances carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 27, 2780-2792.
DOI PMID |
| [18] |
Ma HL, Tecimen HB, Wu Y, Gao R, Yin YF (2024). Influence of litter and nitrogen addition on carbon and nitrogen levels in soil aggregates under a subtropical forest. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 24, 5029-5042.
DOI |
| [19] | Mao L, Tang LL, Ye SM, Wang SQ (2021). Soil organic C and total N as well as microbial biomass C and N affect aggregate stability in a chronosequence of Chinese fir plantations. European Journal of Soil Biology, 106, 103347. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103347. |
| [20] | Márquez CO, Garcia VJ, Cambardella CA, Schultz RC, Isenhart TM (2004). Aggregate-size stability distribution and soil stability. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68, 725-735. |
| [21] |
Ngaba MJY, Bol R, Hu YL (2021). Stable isotopic signatures of carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates following the conversion of natural forests to managed plantations in Eastern China. Plant and Soil, 459, 371-385.
DOI |
| [22] |
Nguetnkam JP, Dultz S (2011). Soil degradation in Central North Cameroon: water-dispersible clay in relation to surface charge in Oxisol A and B horizons. Soil and Tillage Research, 113, 38-47.
DOI URL |
| [23] | Niu GX, Yin GG, Mo XH, Mao QG, Mo JM, Wang JJ, Lu XK (2022). Do long-term high nitrogen inputs change the composition of soil dissolved organic matter in a primary tropical forest? Environmental Research Letters, 17, 095015. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8e87. |
| [24] | Oksanen AJ, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, Mcglinn D (2018). Vegan: community ecology package. Agricultural Sciences, 9, 631-637. |
| [25] |
Pan YD, Birdsey RA, Fang JY, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, McGuire AD, Piao SL, et al. (2011). A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333, 988-993.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
Peñuelas J, Janssens IA, Ciais P, Obersteiner M, Sardans J (2020). Anthropogenic global shifts in biospheric N and P concentrations and ratios and their impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem productivity, food security, and human health. Global Change Biology, 26, 1962-1985.
DOI URL |
| [27] | Peñuelas J, Poulter B, Sardans J, Ciais P, van der Velde M, Bopp L, Boucher O, Godderis Y, Hinsinger P, Llusia J, Nardin E, Vicca S, Obersteiner M, Janssens IA (2013). Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nature Communications, 4, 2934. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3934. |
| [28] |
Pugh TAM, Lindeskog M, Smith B, Poulter B, Arneth A, Haverd V, Calle L (2019). Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 4382-4387.
DOI PMID |
| [29] |
Riggs CE, Hobbie SE, Bach EM, Hofmockel KS, Kazanski CE (2015). Nitrogen addition changes grassland soil organic matter decomposition. Biogeochemistry, 125, 203-219.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
Six J, Paustian K, Elliott ET, Combrink C (2000). Soil structure and organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 681-689.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
Smil V (2000). Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 53-88.
DOI URL |
| [32] | Su FL, Xu S, Sayer EJ, Chen WB, Du Y, Lu XK (2021). Distinct storage mechanisms of soil organic carbon in coniferous forest and evergreen broadleaf forest in tropical China. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113142. |
| [33] |
Tan WB, Wang GA, Huang CH, Gao RT, Xi BD, Zhu B (2017). Physico-chemical protection, rather than biochemical composition, governs the responses of soil organic carbon decomposition to nitrogen addition in a temperate agroecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 598, 282-288.
DOI URL |
| [34] | Tang XL, Zhao X, Bai YF, Tang ZY, Wang WT, Zhao YC, Wan HW, Xie ZQ, Shi XZ, Wu BF, Wang GX, Yan JH, Ma KP, Du S, Li SG, et al. (2018). Carbon pools in China’s terrestrial ecosystems: new estimates based on an intensive field survey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 4021-4026. |
| [35] |
Tian J, Dungait JAJ, Lu XK, Yang YF, Hartley IP, Zhang W, Mo JM, Yu GR, Zhou JZ, Kuzyakov Y (2019). Long-term nitrogen addition modifies microbial composition and functions for slow carbon cycling and increased sequestration in tropical forest soil. Global Change Biology, 25, 3267-3281.
DOI PMID |
| [36] |
Wang RZ, Wu H, Sardans J, Li TP, Liu HY, Peñuelas J, Dijkstra FA, Jiang Y (2020). Carbon storage and plant-soil linkages among soil aggregates as affected by nitrogen enrichment and mowing management in a meadow grassland. Plant and Soil, 457, 407-420.
DOI |
| [37] |
Weng LP, Vega FA, van Riemsdijk WH (2011). Competitive and synergistic effects in pH dependent phosphate adsorption in soils: LCD modeling. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 8420-8428.
DOI URL |
| [38] | Xiao JN, Dong SK, Zhao ZZ, Han YH, Li S, Shen H, Ding CX (2021). Stabilization of soil organic carbon in the alpine meadow is dependent on the nitrogen deposition level on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Engineering, 170, 106348. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106348. |
| [39] | Yang YH, Shi Y, Sun WJ, Chang JF, Zhu JX, Chen LY, Wang X, Guo YP, Zhang HT, Yu LF, Zhao SQ, Xu K, Zhu JL, Shen HH, Wang YY, et al. (2022). Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 52, 534-574. |
| [杨元合, 石岳, 孙文娟, 常锦峰, 朱剑霄, 陈蕾伊, 王欣, 郭焱培, 张宏图, 于凌飞, 赵淑清, 徐亢, 朱江玲, 沈海花, 王媛媛, 等(2022). 中国及全球陆地生态系统碳源汇特征及其对碳中和的贡献. 中国科学: 生命科学, 52, 534-574.] | |
| [40] |
Ye CL, Chen DM, Hall SJ, Pan S, Yan XB, Bai TS, Guo H, Zhang Y, Bai YF, Hu SJ (2018). Reconciling multiple impacts of nitrogen enrichment on soil carbon: plant, microbial and geochemical controls. Ecology Letters, 21, 1162-1173.
DOI PMID |
| [41] |
Yu GR, Chen Z, Piao SL, Peng CH, Ciais P, Wang QF, Li XR, Zhu XJ (2014). High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 4910-4915.
DOI PMID |
| [42] |
Yuan Y, Li Y, Mou ZJ, Kuang LH, Wu WJ, Zhang J, Wang FM, Hui DF, Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Lambers H, Wang J, Kuang YW, Li ZA, Liu ZF (2021). Phosphorus addition decreases microbial residual contribution to soil organic carbon pool in a tropical coastal forest. Global Change Biology, 27, 454-466.
DOI PMID |
| [43] | Zang Y, Xiang YX, Liu J, Jiang PK, Wu JS, Li YF (2024). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on soil water-stable aggregates and organic carbon distribution in moso bamboo forests in subtropical China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 60(7), 8-16. |
| [臧艳, 向宇轩, 刘娟, 姜培坤, 吴家森, 李永夫 (2024). 氮、磷添加对亚热带毛竹林土壤水稳性团聚体及有机碳分布的影响. 林业科学, 60(7), 8-16.] | |
| [44] |
Zhang LQ, Wei XR, Hao MD, Zhang M (2015). Changes in aggregate-associated organic carbon and nitrogen after 27 years of fertilization in a dryland alfalfa grassland on the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Land, 7, 429-437.
DOI |
| [45] | Zhang Y, Ge NN, Liao XL, Wang Z, Wei XR, Jia XX (2021). Long-term afforestation accelerated soil organic carbon accumulation but decreased its mineralization loss and temperature sensitivity in the bulk soils and aggregates. Catena, 204, 105405. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105405. |
| [46] |
Zhong XL, Li JT, Li XJ, Ye YC, Liu SS, Hallett PD, Ogden MR, Naveed M (2017). Physical protection by soil aggregates stabilizes soil organic carbon under simulated N deposition in a subtropical forest of China. Geoderma, 285, 323-332.
DOI URL |
| [47] | Zhong ZK, Wu SJ, Lu XQ, Ren ZX, Wu QM, Xu MP, Ren CJ, Yang GH, Han XH (2021). Organic carbon, nitrogen accumulation, and soil aggregate dynamics as affected by vegetation restoration patterns in the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 196, 104867. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104867. |
| [1] | 陈淼, 陈健, 刘顺, 许格希, 冯秋红, 史作民. 外生菌根真菌对青藏高原东缘岷江冷杉和糙皮桦氮获取贡献及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(菌根生态学): 1-. |
| [2] | 王睿, 贾会丽, 常玉良, 林茂, 栗国梁, 武帅楷, 苏原, 董宽虎, 王常慧. 不同水平氮添加下晋北赖草叶片化学计量特征及其对光合的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 1-. |
| [3] | 张健, 孙慕梵, 宋坤, 赖丽茗, 宋永昌. 基于生态外貌-植物区系分类系统的中国常绿阔叶林分类修订[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 107-122. |
| [4] | 杨浩林, 赵英, 胡秋丽. “两水世界”假说的研究进展与未来展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1344-1362. |
| [5] | 徐志雄, 杞金华, 杨国平, 鲁志云, 杨效东, 范泽鑫. 2005-2010年哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林长期监测样地植物物种组成和群落特征数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1191-1204. |
| [6] | 刘世忠, 张倩媚, 张德强, 刘菊秀, 褚国伟, 李跃林. 1999-2015年鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林长期监测样地植物物种组成和群落特征数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1205-1214. |
| [7] | 王堃莹, 邱贵福, 刘子赫, 孟君, 刘宇轩, 贾国栋. 气候变化对不同退化程度小叶杨林分生长和内在水分利用效率的调节[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 343-355. |
| [8] | 赵梦扬, 庄淏然, 许德浩, 马国荣, 马永成, 冯克鹏. 干旱半干旱地区灌区玉米农田土壤植物大气连续体系统氢氧稳定同位素特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 256-267. |
| [9] | 周红娟, 刘子赫, 刘柯言, 张初蕊, 胡旭, 韩璐, 陈立欣. 不同降雨条件下北京土石山区混生乔灌植物的水分吸收和生态位特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1089-1103. |
| [10] | 吴风燕, 吴永胜, 陈晓涵, 冯骥, 卢丽媛, 查斯娜, 王超宇, 孟元发, 尹强. 鄂尔多斯高原3种固沙灌木水分利用效率的时空变化特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1180-1191. |
| [11] | 焦荟颖, 刘立强, 杨佳鑫, 秦伟, 王睿哲. 新疆野苹果自然种群根际固氮菌、解磷菌及解钾菌对叶片养分和生理指标的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(7): 930-942. |
| [12] | 颜辰亦, 龚吉蕊, 张斯琦, 张魏圆, 董学德, 胡宇霞, 杨贵森. 氮添加对内蒙古温带草原土壤活性有机碳的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 229-241. |
| [13] | 兰光飞, 张强, 陈相标, 陈仕东, 熊德成, 刘小飞, 杨智杰, 杨玉盛. 中亚热带格氏栲林凋落物季节动态特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(12): 1589-1601. |
| [14] | 郑亚纹, 樊海东, 刘立斌, 倪健. 基于高精度遥感影像和精细植被踏查的金华北山植被制图[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(11): 1471-1485. |
| [15] | 陈昭铨, 王明慧, 胡子涵, 郎学东, 何云琼, 刘万德. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林幼苗的群落构建机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 68-79. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19