植物生态学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 55-64.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.006
收稿日期:
2006-11-11
接受日期:
2007-06-09
出版日期:
2008-11-11
发布日期:
2008-01-30
通讯作者:
曹敏
作者简介:
* E-mail: caom@xtbg.ac.cn基金资助:
Received:
2006-11-11
Accepted:
2007-06-09
Online:
2008-11-11
Published:
2008-01-30
Contact:
CAO Min
摘要:
在云南西双版纳州勐腊自然保护区补蚌村的灰阴河望天树(Shorea wantianshuea)林,选择群落结构均一的100 m×200 m区域,设置3条垂直于沟谷并沿谷底到坡顶纵向延伸的20 m×100 m样带 (间隔50 m),在每一样带内每隔20 m设置谷底、低坡、中坡、次坡顶和坡顶5个均匀分布的观测样地,每一样地内设置两个3 m×3 m的小样方。从2004年12月初到2005年9月底每隔2~3个月重复记录幼苗株高、基径和叶片数,统计幼苗死亡数和被动物捕食数,计算幼苗死亡率、动物捕食率和存活率;同时测定各样地土壤含水量。实验结束收获全部现存幼苗,测定和计算幼苗单株叶面积、比叶面积、总生物量和根冠比等生长参数。结果表明:在干旱季节,从谷底到坡顶,各样地土壤含水量依次降低,而幼苗死亡率则依次增大,这种趋势一直持续到实验结束,此时幼苗在谷底、低坡、中坡、次坡顶和坡顶的死亡率分别为55.0%、54.3%、39.4%、35.9%和26.5%。动物捕食导致望天树幼苗的大量损失,但各样地间差异不显著,幼苗的“丢失”也可能是动物捕食的结果。水分胁迫对幼苗生长的影响在干旱季节更为明显,实验结束时幼苗株高在谷底和低坡较大,而在坡顶和次坡顶较小,其它生长参数也都表现出类似的特点,但在实验结束时这些差异并不显著。该文就各种环境因素对望天树幼苗生长与存活的影响进行了讨论。研究的结果可为探寻望天树的致危原因、有效地保护这一珍稀濒危树种和退化次生林的恢复等提供幼苗生态学方面的理论依据。
闫兴富, 曹敏. 濒危树种望天树大量结实后幼苗的生长和存活. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(1): 55-64. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.006
YAN Xing-Fu, CAO Min. SEEDLING GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF THE ENDANGERED TREE SPECIES SHOREA WANTIANSHUEA AFTER A MAST-FRUITING EVENT. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(1): 55-64. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.006
图1 从谷底到坡顶不同森林生境的土壤含水量 (2004.12~2005.9)
Fig.1 Soil moisture content in different habitats from valley bottom to ridge top in Shorea wantianshuea forest (2004.12-2005.9)
生长环境 Growth environment | 干旱死亡 Mortality (%) | 动物捕食 Herbivory (%) | 丢失 Missing (%) | 存活Survival (%) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | ||||
坡顶 RT | 33.10 | 55.02 | 55.02 | 55.02 | 1.67 | 6.52 | 11.40 | 23.06 | 0.00 | 6.70 | 10.22 | 13.74 | 65.24 | 31.77 | 23.37 | 8.18 | |||
±15.36 | ±10.00 | ±10.00 | ±10.00 | ±2.89 | ±3.03 | ±7.2 | ±10.55 | 0.00 | ±5.8 | ±8.86 | ±8.18 | ±18.13 | ±12.56 | ±18.89 | ±8.91 | ||||
次坡顶 LR | 44.62 | 51.24 | 54.27 | 54.27 | 3.33 | 7.14 | 11.69 | 20.81 | 0.00 | 13.30 | 17.70 | 23.52 | 52.05 | 28.31 | 16.34 | 2.50 | |||
±20.07 | ±21.95 | ±17.87 | ±17.87 | ±5.77 | ±3.72 | ±7.6 | ±10.18 | 0.00 | ±2.96 | ±7.41 | ±5.75 | ±15.05 | ±15.5 | ±3.13 | ±2.31 | ||||
中坡 MS | 34.23 | 39.45 | 39.45 | 39.45 | 1.20 | 3.91 | 6.37 | 17.86 | 0.00 | 9.53 | 15.84 | 22.94 | 64.47 | 46.75 | 38.34 | 19.75 | |||
±17.1 | ±19.14 | ±19.14 | ±19.14 | ±1.06 | ±2.36 | ±0.96 | ±3.77 | 0.00 | ±7.88 | ±9.9 | ±11.49 | ±17.93 | ±15.9 | ±14.08 | ±11.88 | ||||
低坡 LS | 29.30 | 34.23 | 35.46 | 35.88 | 0.91 | 6.00 | 11.85 | 23.41 | 0.00 | 13.38 | 17.61 | 28.32 | 69.79 | 46.39 | 34.59 | 12.39 | |||
±7.27 | ±7.73 | ±4.24 | ±4.79 | ±1.57 | ±5.63 | ±8.41 | ±11.24 | 0.00 | ±2.01 | ±0.66 | ±8.74 | ±7.41 | ±4.33 | ±7.63 | ±3.87 | ||||
谷底 VB | 20.59 | 25.85 | 26.49 | 26.49 | 4.91 | 7.37 | 21.21 | 29.89 | 0.00 | 23.95 | 24.94 | 26.78 | 74.49 | 44.63 | 27.36 | 16.84 | |||
±3.1 | ±8.57 | ±10.34 | ±10.34 | ±4.36 | ±2.62 | ±8.6 | ±1.39 | 0.00 | ±9.08 | ±4.3 | ±4.53 | ±2.49 | ±6.86 | ±3.54 | ±6.86 |
表1 从山谷底部到山坡顶部望天树幼苗的死亡率、动物捕食率、丢失率和存活率(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 The mortality, herbivory and missing of Shorea wantianshuea seedlings grown at different sites from valley bottom to ridge top (mean±SD)
生长环境 Growth environment | 干旱死亡 Mortality (%) | 动物捕食 Herbivory (%) | 丢失 Missing (%) | 存活Survival (%) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | ||||
坡顶 RT | 33.10 | 55.02 | 55.02 | 55.02 | 1.67 | 6.52 | 11.40 | 23.06 | 0.00 | 6.70 | 10.22 | 13.74 | 65.24 | 31.77 | 23.37 | 8.18 | |||
±15.36 | ±10.00 | ±10.00 | ±10.00 | ±2.89 | ±3.03 | ±7.2 | ±10.55 | 0.00 | ±5.8 | ±8.86 | ±8.18 | ±18.13 | ±12.56 | ±18.89 | ±8.91 | ||||
次坡顶 LR | 44.62 | 51.24 | 54.27 | 54.27 | 3.33 | 7.14 | 11.69 | 20.81 | 0.00 | 13.30 | 17.70 | 23.52 | 52.05 | 28.31 | 16.34 | 2.50 | |||
±20.07 | ±21.95 | ±17.87 | ±17.87 | ±5.77 | ±3.72 | ±7.6 | ±10.18 | 0.00 | ±2.96 | ±7.41 | ±5.75 | ±15.05 | ±15.5 | ±3.13 | ±2.31 | ||||
中坡 MS | 34.23 | 39.45 | 39.45 | 39.45 | 1.20 | 3.91 | 6.37 | 17.86 | 0.00 | 9.53 | 15.84 | 22.94 | 64.47 | 46.75 | 38.34 | 19.75 | |||
±17.1 | ±19.14 | ±19.14 | ±19.14 | ±1.06 | ±2.36 | ±0.96 | ±3.77 | 0.00 | ±7.88 | ±9.9 | ±11.49 | ±17.93 | ±15.9 | ±14.08 | ±11.88 | ||||
低坡 LS | 29.30 | 34.23 | 35.46 | 35.88 | 0.91 | 6.00 | 11.85 | 23.41 | 0.00 | 13.38 | 17.61 | 28.32 | 69.79 | 46.39 | 34.59 | 12.39 | |||
±7.27 | ±7.73 | ±4.24 | ±4.79 | ±1.57 | ±5.63 | ±8.41 | ±11.24 | 0.00 | ±2.01 | ±0.66 | ±8.74 | ±7.41 | ±4.33 | ±7.63 | ±3.87 | ||||
谷底 VB | 20.59 | 25.85 | 26.49 | 26.49 | 4.91 | 7.37 | 21.21 | 29.89 | 0.00 | 23.95 | 24.94 | 26.78 | 74.49 | 44.63 | 27.36 | 16.84 | |||
±3.1 | ±8.57 | ±10.34 | ±10.34 | ±4.36 | ±2.62 | ±8.6 | ±1.39 | 0.00 | ±9.08 | ±4.3 | ±4.53 | ±2.49 | ±6.86 | ±3.54 | ±6.86 |
图2 从谷底到坡顶的不同森林生境对望天树幼苗株高、基径和叶片数生长的影响 图例见图1
Fig.2 Height, basal stem diameter and leaf number growth of Shorea wantianshuea seedlings in the different habitats of the S. wantianshuea forest Legends see Fig. 1
图3 从谷底到坡顶的不同森林生境中望天树幼苗的单株叶面积、比叶面积、总生物量和根冠比 VB、LS、MS、LR、RT:见图1
Fig.3 Leaf area per seedling, specific leaf area, total dry weight and root-shoot ratio of the Shorea wantianshuea seedlings in the different habitats of the S. wantianshuea forest VB、LS、MS、LR、RT: See Fig.1
[1] | Aranda I, Castro L, Pardos M, Gil L, Pardos JA (2005). Effects of the interaction between drought and shade on water relations, gas exchange and morphological traits in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 210, 117-129. |
[2] | Ashton PMS (1992). Some measurements of microclimate within a Sri Lanka tropical rainforest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 59, 217-235. |
[3] | Ashton PMS, Gunatilieke CVS, Gunatilieke IAUN (1995). Seedling survival and growth of four Shorea species in a Sri Lanka rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 11, 263-279. |
[4] | Ashton PS, Givinish TJ, Appanah S (1988). Staggered flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: new insights into the induction and evolution of mast fruiting in the seasonal tropics. The American Naturalist, 132, 44-66. |
[5] | Bebber D, Brown N, Speight M (2002). Drought and root herbivory in understorey Parashorea (Kurz) seedlings (Dipterocarpaceae) in Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 18, 795-804. |
[6] | Brown N, Press M, Bebber D (1999). Growth and survivorship of dipterocarp seedlings: differences in shade persistence create a special case of dispersal limitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 354, 1847-1855. |
[7] | Burgess PF (1972). Studies on the regeneration of the hill forests of the Malay Peninsula — the phenology of dipterocarps. Malaysian Forester, 35, 103-123. |
[8] | Bücking H, Heyser W (2001). Microautoratio graphic localization of phosphate and carbohydrates in mycorrhizal roots of Populus tremula×Populus alba and implications for transfer processed in ectomycorrhizal associations. Tree Physiology, 21, 101-107. |
[9] | Cao M, Zhang JH (1997). Tree species diversity of tropical forest vegetation in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 995-1006. |
[10] | Connell JH, Lowman MD (1989). Low-diversity tropical rainforests: some possible mechanisms for their existence. The American Naturalist, 134, 88-119. |
[11] | Fu LG (傅立国) (1992). The Red Data Book of Chinese Plants-Rare and Endangered Plants (Volume I) (中国植物红皮书—稀有濒危植物(第1册)). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[12] | Gibbons JM, Newbery DM (2003). Drought avoidance and the effect of local topography on trees in the understorey of Bornean lowland rain forest. Plant Ecology, 164, 1-18. |
[13] | Grime JP (1965). Shade tolerance in flowering plants. Nature, 208, 161-163. |
[14] | Hibbs DE, Chan SS, Castellano M, Niu C (1995). Response of red alder seedlings to CO2 enrichment and water stress. New Phytologist, 129, 569-577. |
[15] | Holl KD, Quiros-Nietzen E (1999). The effect of rabbit herbivory on reforestation of abandoned pasture in southern Costa Rica. Biological Conservation, 87, 391-395. |
[16] | Howlett BE, Davidson DW (2001). Herbivory on planted dipterocarp seedlings in secondary logged forests and primary forests of Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17, 285-302. |
[17] | Janzen DH (1970). Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forest. The American Naturalist, 104, 501-528. |
[18] | Lee LS, Alexander IJ (1996). The dynamics of ectomycorrhizal infection of Shorea leprosula seedlings in Malaysian rain forests. New Phytologist, 132, 297-305. |
[19] | Mark P, Ashton S, Gunatilleke GVS, Gunatilleke IAUN (1995). Seedling survival and growth of four Shorea species in a Sri Lankan rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 11, 263-279. |
[20] | McLaren KP, McDonad MA (2003). The effects of moisture and shade on seed germination and seedling survival in a tropical dry forest in Jamaica. Forest Ecology and Management, 183, 61-75. |
[21] | Mitchell PL, Woodward FI (1988). Responses of three woodland herbs to reduced photosynthetically active radiation and low red to far-red ratio in shade. Journal of Ecology, 76, 807-825. |
[22] | Moles AT, Westoby M (2004). What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size? Oikos, 106, 193-199. |
[23] | Molofsky J, Fisher BL (1993). Habitat and predation effects on seedling survival and growth in shade-tolerant tropical trees. Ecology, 24, 261-265. |
[24] |
Muthukumar T, Sha LQ, Yang XD, Cao M, Tang JW, Zheng Z (2003). Mycorrhiza of plants in different vegetation types in tropical ecosystems of Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Mycorrhiza, 13, 289-297.
URL PMID |
[25] | Newbery DM, Campbell EJF, Proctor J, Still MJ (1996). Primary lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia, Species composition and patterns in the understorey. Vegetatio, 122, 193-220. |
[26] | Osunkoya OO, Ash JE, Hopkins MS, Graham AW (1992). Factors affecting survival of tree seedlings in North Queensland rainforests. Oecologia, 24, 569-578. |
[27] | Poorter L, Hayashida-Oliver Y (2000). Effects of seasonal drought on gap and understorey seedlings in Bolivian moist forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 16, 481-498. |
[28] | Reader RJ, Jalili A, Grime JP, Spencer RE, Matthews N (1993). A comparative study of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in drying soil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 81, 323-336. |
[29] | Simard SW, Perry DA, Jones MD, Myrold DD, Durall DM, Molina R (1997). Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field. Nature, 388, 579-582. |
[30] | Shi ZY (石兆勇), Chen YL (陈应龙), Liu RJ (刘润进) (2003a). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of dipterocarpaceae in Xishuangbanna, Southern Yunnan. Mycosystema (菌物系统), 22, 402-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Shi ZY (石兆勇), Chen YL (陈应龙), Liu RJ (刘润进), Wang WH (王维华) (2003b). Preliminary research on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of Dipterocarpaceae in Xishuangbanna, Southern Yunnan. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27, 360-365. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] | Smith T, Huston M (1989). A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities. Vegetatio, 83, 49-69. |
[33] | Tennakoon MMD, Gunatilleke IAUN, Hafeel KM, Seneviratne CVS, Ashton PMS (2005). Ectomycorrhizal colonization and seedling growth of Shorea (Dipterocarpaceae) species in simulated shade environments of a Sri Lankan rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 208, 399-405. |
[34] | Turner IM (1990a). The seedling survivorship and growth of three Shorea species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 6, 469-478. |
[35] | Turner IM (1990b). Tree seedling growth and survival in a Malaysian rain forest. Biotropica, 22, 146-154. |
[36] | Turner IM, Brown ND, Newton AC (1993). The effect of fertilizer application on dipterocarp seedling growth and mycorrhizal infection. Forest Ecology and Management, 57, 329-337. |
[37] | Veenendaal EM, Swaine MD, Agyeman VK, Blay D, Abebrese IK, Mulins CE (1996). Differences in plant and soil-water relations in and around a forest gap in West Africa during the dry season may influence seedlings establishment and survival. Journal of Ecology, 84, 83-90. |
[38] |
Wright SJ (1991). Seasonal drought and the phenology of understory shrubs in a tropical moist forest. Ecology, 72, 1643-1657.
DOI URL |
[39] | Yan XF (闫兴富), Cao M (曹敏) (2006). Influence of light and temperature on the germination of Shorea wantianshuea (Dipterocarpaceae) seeds. Chinese Bulletin of Botany (植物学通报), 23, 642-650. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[40] | Yin SH (殷寿华), Shuai JG (帅建国) (1990). Study on fruiting behavior, seedling establishment and population age classes of Parashorea chinensis. Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 12, 415-420. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[41] |
Zhang JH, Cao M (1995). Tropical forest vegetation of Xishuangbanna, SW China and its secondary changes, with special reference to some problems in local nature conservation. Biological Conservation, 73, 229-238.
DOI URL |
[42] |
Zhu H (1997). Ecological and biogeographical studies on the tropical rain forest of south Yunnan, SW China, with a special reference to its relation with rain forests of tropical Asia. Journal of Biogeography, 24, 647-662.
DOI URL |
[43] | Zhu H (朱华) (1992). Studies on the community ecology of Shorea chinensis forest in Xishuangbanna. Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 14, 237-258. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[44] | Zhu H (朱华) (1993). A comparative study of phytosociology between Shorea chinensis forest of Xishuangbanna and other closer forest types. Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 15, 34-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 徐子怡 金光泽. 阔叶红松林不同菌根类型幼苗细根功能性状的变异与权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 612-622. |
[2] | 高敏, 缑倩倩, 王国华, 郭文婷, 张宇, 张妍. 低温胁迫对不同母树年龄柠条锦鸡儿种子萌发幼苗生理和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 201-214. |
[3] | 王燕玲, 招礼军, 朱栗琼, 莫若果, 林婷, 赵小雨. 广西天然红鳞蒲桃种群幼苗数量特征及动态分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1278-1286. |
[4] | 姚萌, 康荣华, 王盎, 马方园, 李靳, 台子晗, 方运霆. 利用15N示踪技术研究木荷与马尾松幼苗叶片对NO2的吸收与分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 114-122. |
[5] | 李万年, 罗益敏, 黄则月, 杨梅. 望天树人工幼林混交对土壤微生物功能多样性与碳源利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1109-1124. |
[6] | 谢欢, 张秋芳, 陈廷廷, 曾泉鑫, 周嘉聪, 吴玥, 林惠瑛, 刘苑苑, 尹云锋, 陈岳民. 氮添加促进丛枝菌根真菌和根系协作维持土壤磷有效性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 811-822. |
[7] | 秦江环, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 基于温带针阔混交林植物-土壤反馈的Janzen- Connell假说检验[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 624-631. |
[8] | 程思祺, 姜峰, 金光泽. 温带森林阔叶植物幼苗叶经济谱及其与防御性状的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 678-686. |
[9] | 李思源, 张照鑫, 饶良懿. 桑苗非结构性碳水化合物和生长激素对水淹胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 311-320. |
[10] | 韩大勇, 张维, 努尔买买提•依力亚斯, 杨允菲. 植物种群更新的补充限制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(1): 1-12. |
[11] | 胡慧, 杨雨, 包维楷, 刘鑫, 李芳兰. 干旱河谷微生境变化对乡土植物幼苗定植的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(10): 1028-1039. |
[12] | 吴小琪, 杨圣贺, 黄力, 李笑寒, 杨超, 钱深华, 杨永川. 常绿阔叶林林冠环境对栲幼苗建成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 55-64. |
[13] | 孟令君, 姚杰, 秦江环, 范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林乔木幼苗组成及其密度格局影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6): 653-662. |
[14] | 刘帅, 廖嘉星, 肖翠, 范秀华. 长白山次生针阔混交林乔木幼苗存活的影响因素分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(7): 711-722. |
[15] | 闫琰, 张新娜, 姚杰, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 吉林蛟河不同演替阶段针阔混交林乔木幼苗数量组成及其时间动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(2): 127-139. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19