玛曲高寒沼泽化草甸51种植物光合生理和叶片形态特征的比较

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0057

植物生态学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 593-603.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0057

所属专题：青藏高原植物生态学：生理生态学

玛曲高寒沼泽化草甸51种植物光合生理和叶片形态特征的比较

任青吉¹, 李宏林^2,^*(), 卜海燕²

¹甘南州草原工作站, 甘肃合作 747000
²兰州大学生命科学学院草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2015-03-03 接受日期:2015-04-14 出版日期:2015-06-01 发布日期:2015-07-02
通讯作者: 李宏林
作者简介:
*作者简介: E-mail:tanzh@xtbg.ac.cn
基金资助:
基金项目国家自然科学基金(41171046和41171214)和霍英东教育基金(132038)

Comparison of physiological and leaf morphological traits for photosynthesis of the 51 plant species in the Maqu alpine swamp meadow

REN Qing-Ji¹, LI Hong-Lin^2,^*(), BU Hai-Yan²

¹Grassland Workstation of Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Gannan, Hezuo, Gansu 747000, China
²State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro- ecosystems, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2015-03-03 Accepted:2015-04-14 Online:2015-06-01 Published:2015-07-02
Contact: Hong-Lin LI
About author:
# Co-first authors

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于功能性状的研究方法广泛地应用于生态学研究, 用于解释不同层次的复杂的生态学过程, 而绿色植物叶片的功能性状长期被认为对植物的生存、生长和繁殖具有重要的影响。该研究对玛曲高寒沼泽化草甸51个植物种(分属于14科)的叶片形态和光合性状进行测量, 比较不同物种和不同功能群(莎草科、禾本科和双子叶类杂草)的差异, 分析叶片形态特征和叶片光合性状之间的相关性。结果表明: 1)不同物种、不同功能群之间在比叶面积、净光合速率和水分利用效率等叶片形态和光合特征方面有着显著的差异, 例如禾本科植物具有较高的比叶面积和水分利用效率, 双子叶类杂草具有较大的叶面积, 而莎草科植物具有较高的净光合速率。2)相关性分析结果显示, 无论在物种水平还是功能群水平, 叶片形态和叶片光合性状之间都具有显著的相关关系。该研究揭示了高寒沼泽化草甸植物物种在叶片功能性状上的显著分化, 进而使得这些物种能在同一个草地群落中共存, 而群落中不同功能群物种的组成差异将会对群落的结构、功能和资源利用产生显著的影响。该研究将为进一步研究高寒沼泽化草甸提供基础研究数据并为其保护和恢复提供生理生态学依据。

关键词: 高寒沼泽化草甸, 功能性状, 叶片形态特征, 光合生理特征, 水分利用效率, 功能群

Abstract: Aims

Trait-based approaches are often widely used in ecological research to predict or explain the complex ecological processes at both individual and ecosystem levels. Leaf function with morphological and physiological traits can play important roles in plan growth, survival, reproduction in natural environments. The aim of this study is 1) to determine the differences of leaf traits between both the species and the functional groups in a swamp meadow; 2) to explore the relationship between different leaf morphological traits and physiological traits.

Methods

Gas exchanges of 51 species (in 14 families) were measured on six fully expand health leaves (from different individual plants) using a portable photosynthesis system in the field during the peak of growing season. The leaf morphological traits was measured based on 6 single leaves form different individuals, include the net photosynthesis rate (P_n), transpiration rate (T_r), specific leaf area (SLA), relative leaf water content (LWC), leaf area (LA) and the water use efficiency (WUE = P_n/T_r).

Important findings

Result showed that there were significant interspecific differences in the investigated traits as described in above methods. Among the traits, the LWC (coefficient of variation, CV = 0.11) was ranged from 58.12% to 81.83%, 0.0088-0.0278 m²·g^-1 for the SLA (CV = 0.27), and 0.51 cm² to 100.90 cm² for the LA (CV = 1.73), while the range of 4.25-19.23 μmol CO₂·m^-2·s^-1, 2.89-12.81 mmol H₂O·m^-2·s^-1 and 0.56-3.76 μmol CO₂·mmol^-1H₂O for P_n (CV = 0.33), T_r (CV = 0.33), and WUE (CV = 0.36), respectively. There were also significant differences between the functional groups (sedge, grass and forbs) for these traits. Forbs have larger LA and higher LWC than sedge and grass; Grass have higher WUE and SLA than those of others; while Sedge have higher P_n. Our result also showed there were high correlation between P_n and SLA, WUE and LWC, indicated the strong impacts of leaf morphology on the gas exchange physiology. The SLA was also related to gas exchange traits both among species and functional groups, while the LWC was only among species and LA among functional groups. In conclusion, significant differences in these functional traits among species suggest that these species could vary in resource use and growth form in their community ecosystem. Also the difference among the functional groups in these traits indicates the resource use of the community would be largely influenced by its species composition, especially the differences of functional groups. The research finding will help to better understanding of the ecosystem function in alpine swamp meadow with related management implication.

Key words: alpine swamp meadow, functional traits, leaf morphology, gas exchange, water use efficiency, functional group

任青吉, 李宏林, 卜海燕. 玛曲高寒沼泽化草甸51种植物光合生理和叶片形态特征的比较. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(6): 593-603. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0057

REN Qing-Ji,LI Hong-Lin,BU Hai-Yan. Comparison of physiological and leaf morphological traits for photosynthesis of the 51 plant species in the Maqu alpine swamp meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(6): 593-603. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0057

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2015.0057

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2015/V39/I6/593

图/表 4

参考文献 55

[1]	Ackerly DD, Dudley SA, Sultan SE, Schmitt J, Coleman JS, Linder CR, Sandquist DR, Geber MA, Evans AS, Dawson TE, Lechowicz MJ (2000). The evolution of plant ecophysiological traits: Recent advances and future directions.Bioscience, 50, 979-995.
[2]	Al Haj Khaled R, Duru M, Theau JP, Plantureux S, Cruz P (2005). Variation in leaf traits through seasons and N-availability levels and its consequences for ranking grassland species.Journal of Vegetation Science, 16, 391-398.
[3]	Anderson JE, Inouye RS (2001). Landscape-scale changes in plant species abundance and biodiversity of a sagebrush steppe over 45 years.Ecological Monographs, 71, 531-556.
[4]	Atwell BJ, Kriedemann PE, Turnbull CGN (1999). Plants in Action: Adaptation in Nature, Performance in Cultivation. Macmillan Education Australia, South Yarra.
[5]	Bassow SL, Bazzaz FA (1997). Intra- and inter-specific variation in canopy photosynthesis in a mixed deciduous forest.Oecologia, 109, 507-515.
[6]	Bowman WD, Turner L (1993). Photosynthetic sensitivity to temperature in populations of two C4 Bouteloua (Poacaeae) species native to different altitudes.American Journal of Botany, 80, 369-374.
[7]	Chapin III FS (1993). Functional Role of Growth Forms in Ecosystem and Global Processes. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
[8]	Chen SP, Bai YF, Lin GH, Liang Y, Han XG (2005). Effects of grazing on photosynthetic characteristics of major steppe species in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia, China.Photosynthetica, 43, 559-565.
[9]	Chu CJ, Maestre FT, Xiao S, Weiner J, Wang YS, Duan ZH, Wang G (2008). Balance between facilitation and resource competition determines biomass-density relationships in plant populations.Ecology Letters, 11, 1189-1197.
[10]	Cunningham SA, Summerhayes B, Westoby M (1999). Evolutionary divergences in leaf structure and chemistry, comparing rainfall and soil nutrient gradients.Ecological Monographs, 69, 569-588.
[11]	Frei ER, Ghazoul J, Pluess AR, Bond-Lamberty B (2014). Plastic responses to elevated temperature in low and high elevation populations of three grassland species.PLoS ONE, 9, e98677.
[12]	Ge QZ, Wei B, Zhang LF, Wei WR, Huang B, Jiang XL, Zhang WG (2012). Influence of restoration measures on plant community in alpine meadow.Pratacultural Science, 19, 1517-1520. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[葛庆征, 魏斌, 张灵菲, 卫万荣, 黄彬, 江小雷, 张卫国 (2012). 草地恢复措施对高寒草甸植物群落的影响. 草业科学, 29, 1517-1520.]
[13]	Hamid A, Agata W, Kawamitsu Y (1990). Photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency in four cultivars of mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.Photosynthetica, 24, 96-101.
[14]	Hirasawa T, Hsiao TC (1999). Some characteristics of reduced leaf photosynthesis at midday in maize growing in the field.Field Crops Research, 62, 53-62.
[15]	Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1997). The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes.Science, 277, 1302-1305.
[16]	Hou Y, Guo ZG, Long RJ (2009). Changes of plant community structure and species diversity in degradation process of Shouqu wetland of Yellow River.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20, 27-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[后源, 郭正刚, 龙瑞军 (2009). 黄河首曲湿地退化过程中植物群落组分及物种多样性的变化. 应用生态学报, 20, 27-32.]
[17]	Jiang GM, He WM (1999). Species- and habitat-variability of photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of different plant species in Maowusu Sand Area.Acta Botanica Sinica, 41, 1114-1124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[蒋高明, 何维明 (1999). 毛乌素沙地若干植物光合作用、蒸腾作用和水分利用效率种间及生境间差异. 植物学报, 41, 1114-1124.]
[18]	Jiang GM, Zhu GJ (2001). Effects of natural high temperature and irradiation on photosynthesis and related parameters in three arid sandy shrub species.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 25, 524-531. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[蒋高明, 朱桂杰 (2001). 高温强光环境条件下3种沙地灌木的光合生理特点. 植物生态学报, 25, 525-531.]
[19]	Jiao L (2007). A Study on the Grassland Flora from Maqu in Gannan Tibet Autonomous. Master degree dissertation, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou. (in Chinese)
	[焦亮 (2007). 甘南藏族自治州玛曲县草地植物区系研究. 硕士学位论文, 甘肃农业大学, 兰州.]
[20]	Kimenov GP, Markovska YK, Tsonev TD (1989). Photosynthesis and transpiration of Haberlea rhodopensis FRIV. In dependence on water deficit.Photosynthetica, 23, 368-371.
[21]	Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT (1979). Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, London.
[22]	Larcher W (1995). Physiological Plant Ecology. 3rd edn,. Springer-Verlag New York.
[23]	Lauenroth WK, Dodd JL, Sims PL (1978). The effects of water- and nitrogen-induced stresses on plant community structure in a semiarid grassland.Oecologia, 36, 211-222.
[24]	Lawlor DW (1995). Photosynthesis, productivity and environment.Journal of Experimental Botany, 46, 1449-1461.
[25]	Li HL, Xu DH, Du GZ (2012). Effect of change of plant community composition along degradation gradients on water conditions in an alpine swamp wetland on the Qinghai- Tibetan Plateau of China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 403-410. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李宏林, 徐当会, 杜国祯 (2012). 青藏高原高寒沼泽湿地在退化梯度上植物群落组成的改变对湿地水分状况的影响. 植物生态学报, 36, 403-410.]
[26]	Li W (2011). Research on the Mechanism of Species Diversity Loss due to Fertilization of Alpine Meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. PhD dissertation, Lanzhou Unversity, Lanzhou. (in Chinese)
	[李伟 (2011). 施肥导致高寒草甸物种多样性丧失机制研究. 博士学位论文, 兰州大学, 兰州.]
[27]	Ma MJ, Zhou XH, Du GZ (2011). Soil seed bank dynamics in alpine wetland succession on the Tibetan Plateau.Plant and Soil, 346, 19-28.
[28]	Mack MC, D’Antonio CM (1998). Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes.Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 195-198.
[29]	Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP, Lawton JW, Woodfin RM (1994). Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems.Nature, 368, 734-737.
[30]	Nicotra AB, Hermes JP, Jones CS, Schlichting CD (2007). Geographic variation and plasticity to water and nutrients inPelargonium australe. New Phytologist, 176, 136-149.
[31]	Niinemets Ü (2001). Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs.Ecology, 82, 453-469.
[32]	Niu KC, Choler P, de Bello F, Mirotchnick N, Du GZ, Sun SC (2014). Fertilization decreases species diversity but increases functional diversity: A three-year experiment in a Tibetan alpine meadow.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 182, 106-112.
[33]	Niu SL, Jiang GM, Gao LM, Li YG, Liu MZ (2003). Comparison of gas exchange traits of different plant species in Hunshandak Sand Area.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 27, 318-324. (in English with Chinese abstract)
	[牛书丽, 蒋高明, 高雷明, 李永庚, 刘美珍 (2003). 内蒙古浑善达克沙地97种植物的光合生理特征. 植物生态学报, 27, 318-324.]
[34]	Niu SL, Xing XR, Zhang Z, Xia JY, Zhou XH, Song B, Li LH, Wang SQ (2011). Water-use efficiency in response to climate change: From leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe.Global Change Biology, 17, 1073-1082.
[35]	Pan XB, Zhang JY, Long ZK, Mao LM, Jin HM, Guo LP, Bi XL, Zhao YP (2011). Natural wetland in China.African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5, 45-55.
[36]	Pérez F, Hinojosa LF, Ossa CG, Campano F, Orrego F (2014). Decoupled evolution of foliar freezing resistance, temperature niche and morphological leaf traits in Chilean Myrceugenia.Journal of Ecology, 102, 972-980.
[37]	Pokorny ML, Sheley RL, Zabinski CA, Engel RE, Svejcar TJ, Borkowski JJ (2005). Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion resistance.Restoration Ecology, 13, 448-459.
[38]	Power ME, Tilman D, Estes JA, Menge BA, Bond WJ, Mills LS, Daily G, Castilla JC, Lubchenco J, Paine RT (1996). Challenges in the quest for keystones.BioScience, 46, 609-620.
[39]	Qiu J, Tan DY, Fan DY (2007). Characteristics of photosynthesis and biomass allocation of spring ephemerals in the Junggar Desert. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 31, 883-891. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[邱娟, 谭敦炎, 樊大勇 (2007). 准噶尔荒漠早春短命植物的光合特性及生物量分配特点. 植物生态学报, 31, 883-891.]
[40]	Reich PB (1993). Reconciling apparent discrepancies among studies relating life span, structure and function of leaves in contrasting plant forms and climates: ‘The blind men and the elephant retold’.Functional Ecology, 7, 721-725.
[41]	Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997). From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of American, 94, 13730-13734.
[42]	Schwarz AG, Redmann RE (1989). Photosynthetic properties of C4 grass (Spartina gracilis Trin.) from northern environment.Photosynthetica, 23, 449-459.
[43]	Smith EC, Griffiths H, Wood L, Gillon J (1998). Intra-specific variation in the photosynthetic responses of cyanobiont lichens from contrasting habitats.New Phytologist, 138, 213-223.
[44]	Sultan SE (1987). Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants.Evolutionary Biology, 12, 127-178.
[45]	Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997). The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes.Science, 277, 1300-1302.
[46]	Valladares F, Allen MT, Pearcy RW (1997). Photosynthetic responses to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical rainforest shrubs occuring along a light gradient.Oecologia, 111, 505-514.
[47]	Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007). Let the concept of trait be functional!Oikos, 116, 882-892.
[48]	Walker BH (1992). Biodiversity and ecological redundancy.Conservation Biology, 6, 18-23.
[49]	Wang GX, Li YS, Wang YB, Chen L (2007). Typical alpine wetland system changes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in recent 40 years.Acta Geographica Sinica, 62, 481-491. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王根绪, 李元寿, 王一博, 陈玲 (2007). 近40年来青藏高原典型高寒湿地系统的动态变化. 地理学报, 62, 481-491.]
[50]	Wang RZ, Gao Q (2001). Photosynthesis, transpiration, and water use efficiency in two divergent Leymus chinensis populations from Northeast China.Photosynthetica, 39, 123-126.
[51]	Wang RZ, Yuan YQ (2001). Photosynthesis, transpiration, and water use efficiency of two Puccinellia species on the Songnen grassland, Northeastern China.Photosynthetica, 39, 283-287.
[52]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum.Nature, 428, 821-827.
[53]	Xiang S, Guo RQ, Wu N, Sun SC (2009). Current status and future prospects of Zoige Marsh in Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Ecological Engineering, 35, 553-562.
[54]	Zhang M, Wang WJ, Liu FD, An SQ, Zheng JW, Zhang ST, Wang HG, Xu HG (2007). Photosynthetic capacity and water use efficiency of tropical montane rainforest seedlings or saplings in Hainan Island.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 18, 2160-2166. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张明, 王文进, 刘福德, 安树青, 郑建伟, 张世挺, 王中生, 徐海根 (2007). 海南热带山地雨林幼苗幼树的光合能力与水分利用效率. 应用生态学报, 18, 2160-2166.]
[55]	Zhang XY, Lü XG, Gu HJ (2005). To analysis threats, to describe present conservation situation and to provide management advices of the Ruoergai Marshes.Wetland Science, 3, 292-297. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张晓云, 吕宪国, 顾海军 (2005). 若尔盖湿地面临的威胁、保护现状及对策分析. 湿地科学, 3, 292-297.]

物种 Species	科 Family	LWC (%) CV = 0.11	SLA (m²·g^-1) CV = 0.27	LA (cm²) CV = 1.73	P_n (μmol CO₂·m^-2·s^-1) CV = 0.33	T_r (mmol H₂O· m^-2·s^-1) CV = 0.33	WUE (μmol CO₂· mmol^-1H₂O) CV = 0.36
甘肃薹草	莎草科	60.50 ± 6.21	0.016 4 ± 0.000 5	8.9 ± 1.3	10.09 ± 0.30	6.21 ± 0.13	1.62 ± 0.03
Carex kansuensis	Cyperaceae
乌拉薹草	莎草科	61.09 ± 4.39	0.013 0 ± 0.000 6	14.7 ± 1.3	9.05 ± 0.30	4.39 ± 0.13	2.07 ± 0.08
Carex meyeriana	Cyperaceae
华扁穗草	莎草科	64.12 ± 8.56	0.012 4 ± 0.000 4	4.8 ± 0.8	14.24 ± 0.20	8.56 ± 0.25	1.68 ± 0.05
Blysmus sinocompressus	Cyperaceae
红棕薹草	莎草科	59.29 ± 7.96	0.019 6 ± 0.000 8	2.0 ± 0.3	6.82 ± 0.78	7.96 ± 1.03	0.91 ± 0.05
Carex przewalskii	Cyperaceae
线叶嵩草	莎草科	58.12 ± 8.60	0.008 8 ± 0.000 7	2.3 ± 0.6	16.07 ± 0.08	8.60 ± 0.24	1.88 ± 0.05
Kobresia capilifolia	Cyperaceae
疏花剪股颖	禾本科	59.33 ± 2.89	0.021 6 ± 0.001 2	1.9 ± 1.1	5.03 ± 0.25	2.89 ± 0.11	1.77 ± 0.12
Agrostis perlaxa	Gramineae
甘青剪股颖	禾本科	60.80 ± 6.86	0.026 6 ± 0.001 0	2.3 ± 0.7	8.43 ± 0.36	6.86 ± 1.02	1.39 ± 0.19
Agrostis hugoniana	Gramineae
羊茅	禾本科	58.27 ± 6.61	0.015 1 ± 0.000 5	0.7 ± 0.0	10.29 ± 0.51	6.61 ± 0.44	1.56 ± 0.03
Festuca ovina	Gramineae
发草	禾本科	60.36 ± 3.00	0.013 9 ± 0.000 3	1.3 ± 0.3	11.05 ± 0.32	3.00 ± 0.18	3.76 ± 0.20
Deschampsia caespitosa	Gramineae
恰草	禾本科	63.27 ± 4.68	0.019 5 ± 0.001 2	2.8 ± 0.4	9.46 ± 1.25	4.68 ± 0.74	2.23 ± 0.16
Koeleria macrantha	Gramineae
垂穗披碱草	禾本科	62.63 ± 2.92	0.019 8 ± 0.001 1	3.0 ± 0.7	5.85 ± 1.11	2.92 ± 0.67	2.20 ± 0.10
Elymus nutans	Gramineae
胡氏剪股颖	禾本科	60.71 ± 3.70	0.022 3 ± 0.000 3	1.0 ± 0.4	6.63 ± 0.37	3.70 ± 0.40	1.90 ± 0.15
Agrostis hookeriana	Gramineae
草地早熟禾	禾本科	58.75 ± 3.52	0.024 9 ± 0.000 6	1.5 ± 0.6	5.53 ± 0.61	3.52 ± 0.56	1.71 ± 0.16
Poa pratensis	Gramineae
中华羊茅	禾本科	59.58 ± 3.39	0.020 1 ± 0.000 3	1.8 ± 1.0	6.06 ± 0.35	3.39 ± 0.10	1.78 ± 0.05
Festuca sinensis	Gramineae
密花早熟禾	禾本科	60.45 ± 6.26	0.018 6 ± 0.000 5	1.7 ± 0.5	7.19 ± 0.57	6.26 ± 0.62	1.16 ± 0.03
Poa pachyantha	Gramineae
赖草	禾本科	63.99 ± 5.66	0.017 3 ± 0.000 6	14.5 ± 2.4	9.12 ± 0.61	5.66 ± 0.64	1.71 ± 0.10
Leymus secalinus	Gramineae
唐古特岩黄芪	豆科	71.66 ± 6.39	0.015 5 ± 0.000 2	10.5 ± 3.0	8.75 ± 0.06	6.39 ± 0.30	1.40 ± 0.07
Hedysarum tanguticum	Leguminosae
高山豆	豆科	75.94 ± 5.48	0.019 7 ± 0.000 5	4.4 ± 1.3	10.65 ± 0.48	10.48 ± 0.53	1.07 ± 0.09
Tibetia himalaica	Leguminosae
甘肃棘豆	豆科	71.05 ± 8.77	0.016 8 ± 0.000 6	6.8 ± 1.4	12.28 ± 0.56	8.77 ± 0.44	1.41 ± 0.03
Oxytropis kansuensis	Leguminosae
披针叶黄华	豆科	71.84 ± 5.94	0.014 3 ± 0.000 4	8.5 ± 1.4	13.95 ± 0.41	5.94 ± 0.54	2.50 ± 0.15
Thermopsis lanceolata	Leguminosae
黄帚橐吾	菊科	78.80 ± 7.10	0.013 8 ± 0.000 9	58.7 ± 6.4	13.40 ± 0.07	7.10 ± 0.64	1.99 ± 0.17
Ligularia virgaurea	Compositae
侧颈垂头菊	菊科	80.71 ± 5.81	0.010 7 ± 0.000 5	100.0 ± 5.9	13.17 ± 0.52	5.81 ± 0.19	2.27 ± 0.06
Cremanthodium pleurocaule	Compositae
长毛风毛菊	菊科	80.11 ± 8.67	0.010 7 ± 0.000 2	20.5 ± 6.1	13.92 ± 0.22	10.67 ± 0.61	1.36 ± 0.05
Saussurea hieracioides	Compositae
缘毛紫菀	菊科	80.16 ± 7.38	0.016 4 ± 0.000 3	3.7 ± 0.9	9.66 ± 0.38	11.38 ± 0.12	0.85 ± 0.04
Aster souliei	Compositae
星状风毛菊	菊科	81.10 ± 8.44	0.011 2 ± 0.000 5	5.4 ± 0.8	8.08 ± 0.48	8.44 ± 0.58	0.96 ± 0.02
Saussurea stella	Compositae
禾叶垂头菊	菊科	76.07 ± 6.37	0.008 9 ± 0.000 4	4.0 ± 0.7	13.88 ± 0.37	6.37 ± 0.23	2.21 ± 0.13
Cremanthodium lineare	Compositae
玲玲香清	菊科	72.33 ± 4.56	0.021 4 ± 0.000 2	2.6 ± 0.6	5.96 ± 0.23	4.56 ± 0.26	1.34 ± 0.06
Anaphalis hancockii	Compositae
香芸火绒草	菊科	71.69 ± 7.64	0.021 6 ± 0.000 7	1.3 ± 0.3	10.61 ± 0.12	7.64 ± 0.63	1.45 ± 0.11
Leontopodium haplophylloides	Compositae
小花草玉梅	毛茛科	72.97 ± 6.54	0.014 9 ± 0.000 5	52.2 ± 2.5	9.99 ± 0.50	6.54 ± 0.25	1.53 ± 0.07
Anemone rivularis var. flore-minore	Ranunculaceae
条叶银莲花	毛茛科	76.81 ± 8.14	0.015 4 ± 0.000 2	6.8 ± 1.4	10.73 ± 0.22	8.14 ± 0.24	1.32 ± 0.02
Anemone coelestina var. linearis	Ranunculaceae
矮金莲花	毛茛科	71.79 ± 7.96	0.012 2 ± 0.000 8	6.5 ± 0.9	10.97 ± 0.80	7.96 ± 0.25	1.37 ± 0.06
Trollius farreri	Ranunculaceae
驴蹄草	毛茛科	76.45 ± 7.43	0.019 0 ± 0.000 1	13.5 ± 2.0	8.44 ± 0.14	7.43 ± 0.20	1.15 ± 0.04
Caltha palustris	Ranunculaceae
高山唐松草	毛茛科	64.68 ± 7.17	0.015 6 ± 0.000 5	2.3 ± 1.8	13.03 ± 0.45	7.17 ± 0.18	1.81 ± 0.02
Thalictrum alpinum	Ranunculaceae
巴天酸模	蓼科	81.83 ± 6.73	0.018 6 ± 0.000 2	53.8 ± 3.3	10.46 ± 0.23	6.73 ± 0.33	1.60 ± 0.09
Rumex patientia	Polygonaceae
水生酸模	蓼科	78.96 ± 4.24	0.020 1 ± 0.001 3	10.0 ± 3.0	7.14 ± 0.38	4.24 ± 0.30	1.77 ± 0.10
Rumex aquaticus	Polygonaceae
西伯利亚蓼	蓼科	73.49 ± 5.88	0.013 7 ± 0.001 2	4.6 ± 1.1	19.23 ± 0.97	10.88 ± 0.11	1.77 ± 0.09
Polygonum sibiricum	Polygonaceae
珠芽蓼	蓼科	71.77 ± 7.83	0.013 9 ± 0.000 3	15.2 ± 1.7	7.96 ± 0.32	7.83 ± 0.10	1.01 ± 0.03
Polygonum viviparum	Polygonaceae
湿生扁蕾	龙胆科	81.79 ± 7.95	0.027 8 ± 0.000 9	2.3 ± 0.6	12.21 ± 0.86	7.95 ± 0.86	1.60 ± 0.07
Gentianopsis paludosa	Gentianaceae
椭圆叶花锚	龙胆科	78.65 ± 7.87	0.026 7 ± 0.000 6	1.6 ± 0.6	9.18 ± 0.27	7.87 ± 0.11	1.17 ± 0.04
Halenia elliptica	Gentianaceae
蓝白龙胆	龙胆科	75.22 ± 4.95	0.016 2 ± 0.000 7	0.5 ± 0.0	7.64 ± 0.72	4.95 ± 0.42	1.54 ± 0.03
Gentiana leucomelaena	Gentianaceae
鹅绒委陵菜	蔷薇科	65.53 ± 8.48	0.024 1 ± 0.000 2	12.3 ± 2.1	11.51 ± 0.21	8.48 ± 0.21	1.36 ± 0.01
Potentilla anserina	Rosaceae
莓叶委陵菜	蔷薇科	65.57 ± 7.50	0.015 9 ± 0.000 3	3.8 ± 0.8	7.72 ± 0.31	7.50 ± 0.31	1.03 ± 0.01
Potentilla saundersiana	Rosaceae
矮地榆	蔷薇科	69.03 ± 6.57	0.019 5 ± 0.000 8	10.0 ± 1.7	13.31 ± 0.78	10.57 ± 0.77	1.27 ± 0.02
Sanguisorba filiformis	Rosaceae
高山韭	百合科	79.36 ± 9.92	0.009 9 ± 0.000 3	10.2 ± 2.6	6.04 ± 0.28	9.92 ± 0.26	0.62 ± 0.04
Allium sikkimense	Liliaceae
折被韭	百合科	76.11 ± 9.71	0.014 7 ± 0.000 8	3.8 ± 0.7	15.71 ± 0.83	9.71 ± 0.37	1.63 ± 0.09
Allium chrysocephalum	Liliaceae
毛果婆婆纳	玄参科	72.31 ± 8.90	0.018 4 ± 0.000 6	1.3 ± 0.3	12.08 ± 0.65	8.90 ± 0.33	1.35 ± 0.04
Veronica eriogyne	Scrophulariaceae
拟鼻花马先蒿	玄参科	77.71 ± 5.69	0.019 5 ± 0.000 3	2.2 ± 0.1	4.25 ± 0.32	5.69 ± 0.61	0.77 ± 0.05
Pedicularis rhinanthoides	Scrophulariaceae
青藏大戟	大戟科	64.34 ± 8.32	0.020 1 ± 0.001 1	0.8 ± 0.0	7.64 ± 0.18	8.32 ± 0.51	0.94 ± 0.04
Euphorbia micractina	Euphorbiaceae
平车前	车前科	81.14 ± 9.81	0.026 8 ± 0.000 4	5.7 ± 1.9	7.09 ± 0.42	12.81 ± 0.29	0.56 ± 0.04
Plantago depressa	Plantaginaceae
甘松香	败酱科	78.60 ± 8.75	0.014 5 ± 0.000 9	9.7 ± 1.2	14.06 ± 0.93	11.75 ± 0.72	1.19 ± 0.01
Nardostachys jatamansi	Valerianaceae
矮泽芹	伞形科	75.81 ± 8.17	0.019 3 ± 0.001 7	7.6 ± 0.9	7.02 ± 0.07	8.17 ± 0.05	0.86 ± 0.01
Chamaesium paradoxum	Umbelliferae

物种 Species	科 Family	LWC (%) CV = 0.11	SLA (m²·g^-1) CV = 0.27	LA (cm²) CV = 1.73	P_n (μmol CO₂·m^-2·s^-1) CV = 0.33	T_r (mmol H₂O· m^-2·s^-1) CV = 0.33	WUE (μmol CO₂· mmol^-1H₂O) CV = 0.36
甘肃薹草	莎草科	60.50 ± 6.21	0.016 4 ± 0.000 5	8.9 ± 1.3	10.09 ± 0.30	6.21 ± 0.13	1.62 ± 0.03
Carex kansuensis	Cyperaceae
乌拉薹草	莎草科	61.09 ± 4.39	0.013 0 ± 0.000 6	14.7 ± 1.3	9.05 ± 0.30	4.39 ± 0.13	2.07 ± 0.08
Carex meyeriana	Cyperaceae
华扁穗草	莎草科	64.12 ± 8.56	0.012 4 ± 0.000 4	4.8 ± 0.8	14.24 ± 0.20	8.56 ± 0.25	1.68 ± 0.05
Blysmus sinocompressus	Cyperaceae
红棕薹草	莎草科	59.29 ± 7.96	0.019 6 ± 0.000 8	2.0 ± 0.3	6.82 ± 0.78	7.96 ± 1.03	0.91 ± 0.05
Carex przewalskii	Cyperaceae
线叶嵩草	莎草科	58.12 ± 8.60	0.008 8 ± 0.000 7	2.3 ± 0.6	16.07 ± 0.08	8.60 ± 0.24	1.88 ± 0.05
Kobresia capilifolia	Cyperaceae
疏花剪股颖	禾本科	59.33 ± 2.89	0.021 6 ± 0.001 2	1.9 ± 1.1	5.03 ± 0.25	2.89 ± 0.11	1.77 ± 0.12
Agrostis perlaxa	Gramineae
甘青剪股颖	禾本科	60.80 ± 6.86	0.026 6 ± 0.001 0	2.3 ± 0.7	8.43 ± 0.36	6.86 ± 1.02	1.39 ± 0.19
Agrostis hugoniana	Gramineae
羊茅	禾本科	58.27 ± 6.61	0.015 1 ± 0.000 5	0.7 ± 0.0	10.29 ± 0.51	6.61 ± 0.44	1.56 ± 0.03
Festuca ovina	Gramineae
发草	禾本科	60.36 ± 3.00	0.013 9 ± 0.000 3	1.3 ± 0.3	11.05 ± 0.32	3.00 ± 0.18	3.76 ± 0.20
Deschampsia caespitosa	Gramineae
恰草	禾本科	63.27 ± 4.68	0.019 5 ± 0.001 2	2.8 ± 0.4	9.46 ± 1.25	4.68 ± 0.74	2.23 ± 0.16
Koeleria macrantha	Gramineae
垂穗披碱草	禾本科	62.63 ± 2.92	0.019 8 ± 0.001 1	3.0 ± 0.7	5.85 ± 1.11	2.92 ± 0.67	2.20 ± 0.10
Elymus nutans	Gramineae
胡氏剪股颖	禾本科	60.71 ± 3.70	0.022 3 ± 0.000 3	1.0 ± 0.4	6.63 ± 0.37	3.70 ± 0.40	1.90 ± 0.15
Agrostis hookeriana	Gramineae
草地早熟禾	禾本科	58.75 ± 3.52	0.024 9 ± 0.000 6	1.5 ± 0.6	5.53 ± 0.61	3.52 ± 0.56	1.71 ± 0.16
Poa pratensis	Gramineae
中华羊茅	禾本科	59.58 ± 3.39	0.020 1 ± 0.000 3	1.8 ± 1.0	6.06 ± 0.35	3.39 ± 0.10	1.78 ± 0.05
Festuca sinensis	Gramineae
密花早熟禾	禾本科	60.45 ± 6.26	0.018 6 ± 0.000 5	1.7 ± 0.5	7.19 ± 0.57	6.26 ± 0.62	1.16 ± 0.03
Poa pachyantha	Gramineae
赖草	禾本科	63.99 ± 5.66	0.017 3 ± 0.000 6	14.5 ± 2.4	9.12 ± 0.61	5.66 ± 0.64	1.71 ± 0.10
Leymus secalinus	Gramineae
唐古特岩黄芪	豆科	71.66 ± 6.39	0.015 5 ± 0.000 2	10.5 ± 3.0	8.75 ± 0.06	6.39 ± 0.30	1.40 ± 0.07
Hedysarum tanguticum	Leguminosae
高山豆	豆科	75.94 ± 5.48	0.019 7 ± 0.000 5	4.4 ± 1.3	10.65 ± 0.48	10.48 ± 0.53	1.07 ± 0.09
Tibetia himalaica	Leguminosae
甘肃棘豆	豆科	71.05 ± 8.77	0.016 8 ± 0.000 6	6.8 ± 1.4	12.28 ± 0.56	8.77 ± 0.44	1.41 ± 0.03
Oxytropis kansuensis	Leguminosae
披针叶黄华	豆科	71.84 ± 5.94	0.014 3 ± 0.000 4	8.5 ± 1.4	13.95 ± 0.41	5.94 ± 0.54	2.50 ± 0.15
Thermopsis lanceolata	Leguminosae
黄帚橐吾	菊科	78.80 ± 7.10	0.013 8 ± 0.000 9	58.7 ± 6.4	13.40 ± 0.07	7.10 ± 0.64	1.99 ± 0.17
Ligularia virgaurea	Compositae
侧颈垂头菊	菊科	80.71 ± 5.81	0.010 7 ± 0.000 5	100.0 ± 5.9	13.17 ± 0.52	5.81 ± 0.19	2.27 ± 0.06
Cremanthodium pleurocaule	Compositae
长毛风毛菊	菊科	80.11 ± 8.67	0.010 7 ± 0.000 2	20.5 ± 6.1	13.92 ± 0.22	10.67 ± 0.61	1.36 ± 0.05
Saussurea hieracioides	Compositae
缘毛紫菀	菊科	80.16 ± 7.38	0.016 4 ± 0.000 3	3.7 ± 0.9	9.66 ± 0.38	11.38 ± 0.12	0.85 ± 0.04
Aster souliei	Compositae
星状风毛菊	菊科	81.10 ± 8.44	0.011 2 ± 0.000 5	5.4 ± 0.8	8.08 ± 0.48	8.44 ± 0.58	0.96 ± 0.02
Saussurea stella	Compositae
禾叶垂头菊	菊科	76.07 ± 6.37	0.008 9 ± 0.000 4	4.0 ± 0.7	13.88 ± 0.37	6.37 ± 0.23	2.21 ± 0.13
Cremanthodium lineare	Compositae
玲玲香清	菊科	72.33 ± 4.56	0.021 4 ± 0.000 2	2.6 ± 0.6	5.96 ± 0.23	4.56 ± 0.26	1.34 ± 0.06
Anaphalis hancockii	Compositae
香芸火绒草	菊科	71.69 ± 7.64	0.021 6 ± 0.000 7	1.3 ± 0.3	10.61 ± 0.12	7.64 ± 0.63	1.45 ± 0.11
Leontopodium haplophylloides	Compositae
小花草玉梅	毛茛科	72.97 ± 6.54	0.014 9 ± 0.000 5	52.2 ± 2.5	9.99 ± 0.50	6.54 ± 0.25	1.53 ± 0.07
Anemone rivularis var. flore-minore	Ranunculaceae
条叶银莲花	毛茛科	76.81 ± 8.14	0.015 4 ± 0.000 2	6.8 ± 1.4	10.73 ± 0.22	8.14 ± 0.24	1.32 ± 0.02
Anemone coelestina var. linearis	Ranunculaceae
矮金莲花	毛茛科	71.79 ± 7.96	0.012 2 ± 0.000 8	6.5 ± 0.9	10.97 ± 0.80	7.96 ± 0.25	1.37 ± 0.06
Trollius farreri	Ranunculaceae
驴蹄草	毛茛科	76.45 ± 7.43	0.019 0 ± 0.000 1	13.5 ± 2.0	8.44 ± 0.14	7.43 ± 0.20	1.15 ± 0.04
Caltha palustris	Ranunculaceae
高山唐松草	毛茛科	64.68 ± 7.17	0.015 6 ± 0.000 5	2.3 ± 1.8	13.03 ± 0.45	7.17 ± 0.18	1.81 ± 0.02
Thalictrum alpinum	Ranunculaceae
巴天酸模	蓼科	81.83 ± 6.73	0.018 6 ± 0.000 2	53.8 ± 3.3	10.46 ± 0.23	6.73 ± 0.33	1.60 ± 0.09
Rumex patientia	Polygonaceae
水生酸模	蓼科	78.96 ± 4.24	0.020 1 ± 0.001 3	10.0 ± 3.0	7.14 ± 0.38	4.24 ± 0.30	1.77 ± 0.10
Rumex aquaticus	Polygonaceae
西伯利亚蓼	蓼科	73.49 ± 5.88	0.013 7 ± 0.001 2	4.6 ± 1.1	19.23 ± 0.97	10.88 ± 0.11	1.77 ± 0.09
Polygonum sibiricum	Polygonaceae
珠芽蓼	蓼科	71.77 ± 7.83	0.013 9 ± 0.000 3	15.2 ± 1.7	7.96 ± 0.32	7.83 ± 0.10	1.01 ± 0.03
Polygonum viviparum	Polygonaceae
湿生扁蕾	龙胆科	81.79 ± 7.95	0.027 8 ± 0.000 9	2.3 ± 0.6	12.21 ± 0.86	7.95 ± 0.86	1.60 ± 0.07
Gentianopsis paludosa	Gentianaceae
椭圆叶花锚	龙胆科	78.65 ± 7.87	0.026 7 ± 0.000 6	1.6 ± 0.6	9.18 ± 0.27	7.87 ± 0.11	1.17 ± 0.04
Halenia elliptica	Gentianaceae
蓝白龙胆	龙胆科	75.22 ± 4.95	0.016 2 ± 0.000 7	0.5 ± 0.0	7.64 ± 0.72	4.95 ± 0.42	1.54 ± 0.03
Gentiana leucomelaena	Gentianaceae
鹅绒委陵菜	蔷薇科	65.53 ± 8.48	0.024 1 ± 0.000 2	12.3 ± 2.1	11.51 ± 0.21	8.48 ± 0.21	1.36 ± 0.01
Potentilla anserina	Rosaceae
莓叶委陵菜	蔷薇科	65.57 ± 7.50	0.015 9 ± 0.000 3	3.8 ± 0.8	7.72 ± 0.31	7.50 ± 0.31	1.03 ± 0.01
Potentilla saundersiana	Rosaceae
矮地榆	蔷薇科	69.03 ± 6.57	0.019 5 ± 0.000 8	10.0 ± 1.7	13.31 ± 0.78	10.57 ± 0.77	1.27 ± 0.02
Sanguisorba filiformis	Rosaceae
高山韭	百合科	79.36 ± 9.92	0.009 9 ± 0.000 3	10.2 ± 2.6	6.04 ± 0.28	9.92 ± 0.26	0.62 ± 0.04
Allium sikkimense	Liliaceae
折被韭	百合科	76.11 ± 9.71	0.014 7 ± 0.000 8	3.8 ± 0.7	15.71 ± 0.83	9.71 ± 0.37	1.63 ± 0.09
Allium chrysocephalum	Liliaceae
毛果婆婆纳	玄参科	72.31 ± 8.90	0.018 4 ± 0.000 6	1.3 ± 0.3	12.08 ± 0.65	8.90 ± 0.33	1.35 ± 0.04
Veronica eriogyne	Scrophulariaceae
拟鼻花马先蒿	玄参科	77.71 ± 5.69	0.019 5 ± 0.000 3	2.2 ± 0.1	4.25 ± 0.32	5.69 ± 0.61	0.77 ± 0.05
Pedicularis rhinanthoides	Scrophulariaceae
青藏大戟	大戟科	64.34 ± 8.32	0.020 1 ± 0.001 1	0.8 ± 0.0	7.64 ± 0.18	8.32 ± 0.51	0.94 ± 0.04
Euphorbia micractina	Euphorbiaceae
平车前	车前科	81.14 ± 9.81	0.026 8 ± 0.000 4	5.7 ± 1.9	7.09 ± 0.42	12.81 ± 0.29	0.56 ± 0.04
Plantago depressa	Plantaginaceae
甘松香	败酱科	78.60 ± 8.75	0.014 5 ± 0.000 9	9.7 ± 1.2	14.06 ± 0.93	11.75 ± 0.72	1.19 ± 0.01
Nardostachys jatamansi	Valerianaceae
矮泽芹	伞形科	75.81 ± 8.17	0.019 3 ± 0.001 7	7.6 ± 0.9	7.02 ± 0.07	8.17 ± 0.05	0.86 ± 0.01
Chamaesium paradoxum	Umbelliferae

玛曲高寒沼泽化草甸51种植物光合生理和叶片形态特征的比较

Comparison of physiological and leaf morphological traits for photosynthesis of the 51 plant species in the Maqu alpine swamp meadow

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 55

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘聪聪何念鹏李颖张佳慧闫镤王若梦王瑞丽. 宏观生态学中的植物功能性状：研究历史与发展趋势[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0.
[2]	陈昭铨王明慧胡子涵郎学东何云琼刘万德. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林幼苗群落构建机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0.
[3]	袁雅妮, 周哲, 陈彬洲, 郭垚鑫, 岳明. 基于功能性状的锐齿槲栎林共存树种生态策略差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1270-1277.
[4]	李伟斌, 张红霞, 张玉书, 陈妮娜. 昼夜不对称增温对长白山阔叶红松林碳汇能力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1225-1233.
[5]	赵艳超, 陈立同. 土壤养分对青藏高原高寒草地生物量响应增温的调节作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1071-1081.
[6]	孙佳慧, 史海兰, 陈科宇, 纪宝明, 张静. 植物细根功能性状的权衡关系研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1055-1070.
[7]	赵孟娟, 金光泽, 刘志理. 阔叶红松林3种典型蕨类叶功能性状的垂直变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1131-1143.
[8]	代景忠, 白玉婷, 卫智军, 张楚, 辛晓平, 闫玉春, 闫瑞瑞. 羊草功能性状对施肥的动态响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 943-953.
[9]	周莹莹, 林华. 不同水热梯度下冠层优势树种叶片热力性状及适应策略的变化趋势[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 733-744.
[10]	李伟, 张荣. 亚高寒草甸群落结构决定群落生产力实例验证[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 713-723.
[11]	陈雪纯, 刘虹, 朱少琦, 孙铭遥, 宇振荣, 王庆刚. 漓江流域不同弃耕年限下4种常见草本植物功能性状种内变化及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 559-570.
[12]	王文伟, 韩伟鹏, 刘文文. 滨海湿地入侵植物互花米草叶片功能性状对潮位的短期响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 216-226.
[13]	安凡李宝银钟全林程栋梁徐朝斌邹宇星张雪林秋燕邓兴宇. 不同种源刨花楠苗木生长与主要功能性状对氮添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1693-1707.
[14]	汤璐瑶, 方菁, 钱海蓉, 张博纳, 上官方京, 叶琳峰, 李姝雯, 童金莲, 谢江波. 落羽杉和池杉功能性状随高度的变异与协同[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1561-1575.
[15]	李杰, 郝珉辉, 范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 东北温带森林树种和功能多样性对生态系统多功能性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1507-1522.