Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 639-647.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.03.013
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Ya-Jun, CAO Kun-Fang, CAI Zhi-Quan()
Received:
2007-08-14
Accepted:
2007-11-06
Online:
2008-08-14
Published:
2008-05-30
Contact:
CAI Zhi-Quan
CHEN Ya-Jun, CAO Kun-Fang, CAI Zhi-Quan. ABOVE- AND BELOW-GROUND COMPETITION BETWEEN SEEDLINGS OF LIANAS AND TREES UNDER TWO LIGHT IRRADIANCES[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(3): 639-647.
Fig.1 Schematic representation of four types of competition treatments AC: All competition NC: No competition RC: Root competition SC: Shoot competition
Fig.2 The relative growth rate calculated with biomass (RGRB) and leaf area (RGRA) in seedlings of the liana (Byttneria grandifolia) grown under different light and competition treatments (mean ± SE, n=8-10)
最大净光合速率 Maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax) | 总生物量 Total biomass | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | F | p | ||||||||||||||
羊蹄甲Bauhinia variegata | |||||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 12.10 | <0.001 | 36.70 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争 Competition | 227.26 | <0.001 | 7.38 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 3.17 | 0.030 | 4.81 | 0.005 | |||||||||||||
绒毛番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | |||||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 34.92 | <0.001 | 33.72 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争 Competition | 8.46 | <0.001 | 18.74 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 1.28 | 0.289 | 5.70 | 0.002 | |||||||||||||
五桠果木姜子Litsea dilleniifolia | |||||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 149.83 | <0.001 | 38.92 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争 Competition | 30.38 | <0.001 | 13.2 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 10.05 | <0.001 | 8.46 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Results of two-way ANOVA assessing the effects of competition, light level and their interactions on photosynthetic capacity and total biomass of three tree species
最大净光合速率 Maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax) | 总生物量 Total biomass | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | F | p | ||||||||||||||
羊蹄甲Bauhinia variegata | |||||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 12.10 | <0.001 | 36.70 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争 Competition | 227.26 | <0.001 | 7.38 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 3.17 | 0.030 | 4.81 | 0.005 | |||||||||||||
绒毛番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | |||||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 34.92 | <0.001 | 33.72 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争 Competition | 8.46 | <0.001 | 18.74 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 1.28 | 0.289 | 5.70 | 0.002 | |||||||||||||
五桠果木姜子Litsea dilleniifolia | |||||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 149.83 | <0.001 | 38.92 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争 Competition | 30.38 | <0.001 | 13.2 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 10.05 | <0.001 | 8.46 | <0.001 |
Fig.3 The maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax) and total biomass in seedlings of three tree species under different light and competition treatments Values are mean±SE, n=8-10. Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among the competition treatments at the same light level. Abbreviations are the same as in Figs. 1, 2
RGRB | RGRH | RGRA | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | F | p | F | p | ||
羊蹄甲Bauhinia variegata | |||||||
光强 Light intensity | 99.76 | <0.001 | 21.77 | <0.001 | 11.440 | 0.001 | |
竞争 Competition | 12.06 | <0.001 | 12.42 | <0.001 | 10.450 | <0.001 | |
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 7.99 | <0.001 | 4.91 | 0.004 | 6.460 | 0.001 | |
绒毛番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | |||||||
光强 Light intensity | 28.91 | <0.001 | 19.36 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.971 | |
竞争 Competition | 18.78 | <0.001 | 19.00 | <0.001 | 5.870 | 0.001 | |
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 1.16 | 0.332 | 0.43 | 0.730 | 0.400 | 0.755 | |
五桠果木姜子Litsea dilleniifolia | |||||||
光强 Light intensity | 48.71 | <0.001 | 44.04 | <0.001 | 1.350 | 0.250 | |
竞争 Competition | 16.00 | <0.001 | 12.70 | <0.001 | 9.870 | <0.001 | |
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 7.30 | <0.001 | 5.45 | 0.002 | 5.070 | 0.003 |
Table 2 Results of two-way ANOVA assessing the effects of competition, light level and their interactions on relative growth rate (RGR) of three tree species
RGRB | RGRH | RGRA | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | F | p | F | p | ||
羊蹄甲Bauhinia variegata | |||||||
光强 Light intensity | 99.76 | <0.001 | 21.77 | <0.001 | 11.440 | 0.001 | |
竞争 Competition | 12.06 | <0.001 | 12.42 | <0.001 | 10.450 | <0.001 | |
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 7.99 | <0.001 | 4.91 | 0.004 | 6.460 | 0.001 | |
绒毛番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | |||||||
光强 Light intensity | 28.91 | <0.001 | 19.36 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.971 | |
竞争 Competition | 18.78 | <0.001 | 19.00 | <0.001 | 5.870 | 0.001 | |
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 1.16 | 0.332 | 0.43 | 0.730 | 0.400 | 0.755 | |
五桠果木姜子Litsea dilleniifolia | |||||||
光强 Light intensity | 48.71 | <0.001 | 44.04 | <0.001 | 1.350 | 0.250 | |
竞争 Competition | 16.00 | <0.001 | 12.70 | <0.001 | 9.870 | <0.001 | |
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 7.30 | <0.001 | 5.45 | 0.002 | 5.070 | 0.003 |
Fig.4 Relative growth rate in seedlings of three tree species under different light and competition treatments Values are mean±SE, n=8-10. Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among the competition treatments at the same light level. Abbreviations are the same as in Figs. 1, 2 andTable 2
高度 Height | 直径 Diameter | 长细比 Slenderness ratio | 叶面积 Leaf area | 比叶面积 SLA | 叶面积比 LAR | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||||
羊蹄甲Bauhinia variegata | |||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 53.87 | <0.001 | 57.26 | <0.001 | 3.42 | 0.07 | 12.84 | 0.001 | 231.83 | <0.001 | 154.48 | <0.001 | |||
竞争 Competition | 19.89 | <0.001 | 13.12 | <0.001 | 2.74 | 0.051 | 9.29 | <0.001 | 5.73 | 0.002 | 4.39 | 0.007 | |||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 11.03 | <0.001 | 7.71 | <0.001 | 2.47 | 0.07 | 5.59 | 0.002 | 7.40 | <0.001 | 5.75 | 0.002 | |||
绒毛番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | |||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 16.01 | <0.001 | 60.1 | <0.001 | 13.56 | 0.001 | 1.29 | 0.261 | 6.70 | 0.012 | 63.01 | <0.001 | |||
竞争 Competition | 16.67 | <0.001 | 19.07 | <0.001 | 2.65 | 0.057 | 6.38 | 0.001 | 0.992 | 0.403 | 2.20 | 0.098 | |||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 0.19 | 0.903 | 3.37 | 0.025 | 1.61 | 0.197 | 0.36 | 0.784 | 1.198 | 0.319 | 0.37 | 0.776 | |||
五桠果木姜子Litsea dilleniifolia | |||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 42.84 | <0.001 | 85.27 | <0.001 | 5.47 | 0.023 | 5.37 | 0.024 | 53.96 | <0.001 | 127.93 | <0.001 | |||
竞争 Competition | 12.33 | <0.001 | 23.28 | <0.001 | 2.68 | 0.055 | 8.98 | <0.001 | 0.67 | 0.573 | 2.49 | 0.069 | |||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 5.88 | 0.001 | 11.52 | <0.001 | 0.77 | 0.514 | 5.40 | 0.002 | 2.32 | 0.08 | 2.17 | 0.101 |
Table 3 Result of two-way ANOVA assessing the effects of competition, light level and their interactions on morphological traits in seedlings of three tree species under different light and competition treatments
高度 Height | 直径 Diameter | 长细比 Slenderness ratio | 叶面积 Leaf area | 比叶面积 SLA | 叶面积比 LAR | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | F | p | ||||
羊蹄甲Bauhinia variegata | |||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 53.87 | <0.001 | 57.26 | <0.001 | 3.42 | 0.07 | 12.84 | 0.001 | 231.83 | <0.001 | 154.48 | <0.001 | |||
竞争 Competition | 19.89 | <0.001 | 13.12 | <0.001 | 2.74 | 0.051 | 9.29 | <0.001 | 5.73 | 0.002 | 4.39 | 0.007 | |||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 11.03 | <0.001 | 7.71 | <0.001 | 2.47 | 0.07 | 5.59 | 0.002 | 7.40 | <0.001 | 5.75 | 0.002 | |||
绒毛番龙眼Pometia tomentosa | |||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 16.01 | <0.001 | 60.1 | <0.001 | 13.56 | 0.001 | 1.29 | 0.261 | 6.70 | 0.012 | 63.01 | <0.001 | |||
竞争 Competition | 16.67 | <0.001 | 19.07 | <0.001 | 2.65 | 0.057 | 6.38 | 0.001 | 0.992 | 0.403 | 2.20 | 0.098 | |||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 0.19 | 0.903 | 3.37 | 0.025 | 1.61 | 0.197 | 0.36 | 0.784 | 1.198 | 0.319 | 0.37 | 0.776 | |||
五桠果木姜子Litsea dilleniifolia | |||||||||||||||
光强 Light intensity | 42.84 | <0.001 | 85.27 | <0.001 | 5.47 | 0.023 | 5.37 | 0.024 | 53.96 | <0.001 | 127.93 | <0.001 | |||
竞争 Competition | 12.33 | <0.001 | 23.28 | <0.001 | 2.68 | 0.055 | 8.98 | <0.001 | 0.67 | 0.573 | 2.49 | 0.069 | |||
竞争×光强 Competition×light intensity | 5.88 | 0.001 | 11.52 | <0.001 | 0.77 | 0.514 | 5.40 | 0.002 | 2.32 | 0.08 | 2.17 | 0.101 |
Fig.5 The morphological traits in seedlings of three tree species under different light and competition treatments Values are mean±SE, n=8 per treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among the competition treatments at the same light level. Abbreviations are the same as in Figs. 1, 2 andTable 3
[1] | Balfour DA, Bond WJ (1993). Factors limiting climber distribution and abundance in a southern African forest. Journal of Ecology, 11,93-99. |
[2] | Barberis IM, Tanner EVJ (2005). Gaps and root trenching increase tree seedling growth in Panamanian semi-evergreen forest. Ecology, 86,667-674. |
[3] | Cahill JF (2002). Interactions between root and shoot competition vary among species. Oikos, 99,101-112. |
[4] | Cai ZQ, Poorter L, Cao KF, Bongers F (2007). Seedling growth strategies in Bauhinia species: comparing lianas and trees . Annals of Botany, 100,831-838. |
[5] | Campbell EJF, Newbery DM (1993). Ecological relationships between lianas and trees in lowland rain forest in Sabah, East Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 9,469-490. |
[6] | Chen YJ (陈亚军), Chen JW (陈军文), Cai ZQ (蔡志全) (2007). Lianas and their functions in tropical forests. Chinese Bulletin of Botany (植物学通报), 24,240-249. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2000). Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecological Monographs, 70,171-207. |
[8] | Croat TB (1978). Flora of Barro Colorado Island. Stanford University Press , California. |
[9] | Denslow JS, Schultz JC, Vitousek PM, Strain BR (1990). Growth responses of tropical shrubs to treefall gap environments. Ecology, 71,165-179. |
[10] | Dewalt SJ, Schnitzer SA, Denslow JS (2000). Density and diversity of lianas along a chronosequence in a central Panamanian lowland forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 16,1-19. |
[11] | Dillenburg LR, Teramura AH, Forseth IN, Whigham DF (1995). Photosynthetic and biomass allocation responses of Liquidambar styraciflua (Hamamelidaceae) to vine competition . American Journal of Botany, 82,454-461. |
[12] | Dillenburg LR, Whigham DF, Teramura AH, Forseth IN (1993). Effects of below- and aboveground competition from vines Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia on the growth of the tree host Liquidambar styraciflua. Oecologia, 93,48-54. |
[13] | Gerwing JJ, Vidal E (2002). Changes in liana abundance and species diversity eight years after liana cutting and logging in an eastern Amazonian forest. Conservation Biology, 16,544-548. |
[14] | Gorchov DL, Trisel DE (2003). Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings . Plant Ecology, 166,13-24. |
[15] | Kainer KA, Wadt LHO, Gomes-Silva DAP, Capunuá M (2006). Liana loads and their association with Bertholletia excelsa fruit and nut production, diameter growth and crown attributes . Journal of Tropical Ecology, 22,147-154. |
[16] | Laurance WF, Pérez-Salicrup D, Delamonica P, Fearnside P, D'Angelo S, Jerozolinski A, Pohl L, Lovejoy T (2001). Rain forest fragmentation and the structure of Amazonian liana communities. Ecology, 82,105-116. |
[17] | Lewis SL, Tanner EVJ (2000). Effects of above- and belowground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings. Ecology, 81,2525-2538. |
[18] | Li B (李博), Chen JK (陈家宽), Watkinson AR (1998). A literature review on plant competition. Chinese Bulletin of Botany (植物学通报), 15,18-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Ostertag R (1998). Belowground effects of canopy gaps in a tropical wet forest. Ecology, 79,1294-1304. |
[20] |
Pérez-Salicrup D, Barker MG (2000a). Comparative water relations of mature mahogany ( Swietenia macrophylla) trees with and without lianas in a subhumid, seasonally dry forest in Bolivia . Tree Physiology, 20,1167-1174.
URL PMID |
[21] | Pérez-Salicrup DR, Barker MG (2000b). Effect of liana cutting on water potential and growth of adult Senna multijuga (Caesalpiniodae) trees in a Bolivian tropical forest . Oecologia, 124,369-475. |
[22] | Phillips OL, Martinez RV, Arroyo L, Barker TR, Killeen T, Lewis SL, Malhi Y, Monteagudo AM, Neill B, Vargas PN, Alexiades M, Carson C, Fiore AD, Erwin T, Jardim A, Palacios W, Saldias M, Vinceti B (2002). Increasing dominance of large lianas in Amazonian forest. Nature, 418,770-774. |
[23] | Pinard MA, Putz FE (1994). Vine infestation of large remnant trees in logged forest in Sabah, Malaysia: biochemical facilitation in vine succession. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 6,302-309. |
[24] | Poorter L (2005). Resource capture and use by tropical forest tree seedlings and their consequences for competition. In: Burslem DFRP, Pinard MA, Hartley SE eds. Biotic Interactions in the Tropics: Their Role in the Maintenance of Species Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,UK, 35-64. |
[25] |
Popma J, Bongers F (1988). The effect of canopy gaps on growth and morphology of seedlings of rain forest species. Oecologia, 75,625-632.
URL PMID |
[26] | Putz FE (1984). The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology, 65,1713-1724. |
[27] | Putz FE, Mooney HA (1991). The Biology of Vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , UK. |
[28] | Restom TG, Nepstad DC (2004). Seedling growth dynamics of a deeply-rooting liana in a secondary forest in Eastern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 190,109-118. |
[29] | Schnitzer SA (2005). A mechanistic explanation for global patterns of liana abundance and distribution. American Naturalist, 166,262-276. |
[30] | Schnitzer SA, Bongers F (2002). The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17,223-230. |
[31] | Schnitzer SA, Carson WP (2001). Tree fall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology, 82,913-919. |
[32] | Schnitzer SA, Dalling JW, Carson WP (2000). The impact of lianas on tree regeneration in tropical forest canopy gaps: evidence for an alternative pathway of gap-phase regeneration. Journal of Ecology, 88,655-666. |
[33] |
Schnitzer SA, Kuzee M, Bongers F (2005). Disentangling above- and belowground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology, 93,1115-1125.
DOI URL PMID |
[34] | Schnitzer SA, Parren MPE, Bongers F (2004). Recruitment of lianas into logging gaps and the effects of pre-harvesting climber cutting. Forest Ecology and Management, 190,87-98. |
[35] | Stevens GC (1987). Lianas as structural parasites: the Bursera simaruba example . Ecology, 68,77-81. |
[36] | Uhl C (1988). Vegetation dynamics in Amazonian treefall gaps. Ecology, 49,751-763. |
[37] | Vidal E, Johns J, Gerwing JJ, Barretto P, Uhl C (1997). Vine management for reduced-impact logging in Eastern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 98,105-114. |
[38] | Wilson SD, Tilman D (1995). Competitive responses of eight old-field plant species in four environments. Ecology, 76,1169-1180. |
[39] | Wright SJ, Calderón O, Hernandéz A, Paton S (2004). Are lianas increasing in importance in tropical forests? A 17-year record from Panama. Ecology, 85,484-489. |
[40] | Xiang YC (向言辞), Peng SL (彭少麟), Peng XH (彭秀花), Cai XA (蔡锡安), Rao XQ (饶兴权) (2005). Measures of plant competition among three species of transplanted tree seedlings. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29,724-729. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | LI Wei-Bin, ZHANG Hong-Xia, ZHANG Yu-Shu, CHEN Ni-Na. Influence of diurnal asymmetric warming on carbon sink capacity in a broadleaf Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1225-1233. |
[2] | JIANG Hai-Gang, ZENG Yun-Hong, TANG Hua-Xin, LIU Wei, LI Jie-Lin, HE Guo-Hua, QIN Hai-Yan, WANG Li-Chao, Victor RESCO de DIOS, YAO Yin-An. Rhythmic regulation of carbon fixation and water dissipation in three mosses [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(7): 988-997. |
[3] | WANG Jia-Yi, WANG Xiang-Ping, XU Cheng-Yang, XIA Xin-Li, XIE Zong-Qiang, FENG Fei, FAN Da-Yong. Response of hydraulic architecture in Fraxinus velutina street trees to the percentage of impervious pavement in Beijing [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(7): 998-1009. |
[4] | LIU Hai-Yan, ZANG Sha-Sha, ZHANG Chun-Xia, ZUO Jin-Cheng, RUAN Zuo-Xi, WU Hong-Yan. Photochemical reaction of photosystem II in diatoms under phosphorus starvation and its response to high light intensity [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(12): 1718-1727. |
[5] | CHEN Yi-Zhu, LANG Wei-Guang, CHEN Xiao-Qiu. Process-based simulation of autumn phenology of trees and the regional differentiation attribution in northern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(7): 753-765. |
[6] | WEI Long-Xin, GENG Yan, CUI Ke-Da, QIAO Xue-Tao, YUE Qing-Min, FAN Chun-Yu, ZHANG Chun-Yu, ZHAO Xiu-Hai. Responses of tree growth to harvesting intensity among forest strata and growth stages in a broadleaved Korean pine forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 642-655. |
[7] | YUAN Yuan, MU Yan-Mei, DENG Yu-Jie, LI Xin-Hao, JIANG Xiao-Yan, GAO Sheng-Jie, ZHA Tian- Shan, JIA Xin. Effects of land cover and phenology changes on the gross primary productivity in an Artemisia ordosica shrubland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 162-175. |
[8] | LI Hong-Qin, ZHANG Ya-Ru, ZHANG Fa-Wei, MA Wen-Jing, LUO Fang-Lin, WANG Chun-Yu, YANG Yong-Sheng, ZHANG Lei-Ming, LI Ying-Nian. Application of boosted regression trees for the gap-filling to flux dataset in an alpine scrubland of Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(12): 1437-1447. |
[9] | WU Lin-Sheng, ZHANG Yong-Guang, ZHANG Zhao-Ying, ZHANG Xiao-Kang, WU Yun-Fei. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and its applications in terrestrial ecosystem monitoring [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(10): 1167-1199. |
[10] | JIN Chuan, LI Xin-Hao, JIANG Yan, XU Ming-Ze, TIAN Yun, LIU Peng, JIA Xin, ZHA Tian- Shan. Relative changes and regulation of photosynthetic energy partitioning components in Artemisia ordosica during growing season [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(8): 870-879. |
[11] | WU Hong-Min, SHUANG Sheng-Pu, ZHANG Jin-Yan, CUN Zhu, MENG Zhen-Gui, LI Long-Gen, SHA Ben-Cai, CHEN Jun-Wen. Photodamage to photosystem in a typically shade-tolerant species Panax notoginseng exposed to a sudden increase in light intensity [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(4): 404-419. |
[12] | YE Zi-Piao, YU Feng, AN Ting, WANG Fu-Biao, KANG Hua-Jing. Investigation on CO2-response model of stomatal conductance for plants [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(4): 420-428. |
[13] | WANG Zhao-Peng, ZHANG Tong-Wen, YUAN Yu-Jiang, ZHANG Rui-Bo, YU Shu-Long, LIU Rui, Shirenna JIAHAN, GUO Dong, WANG Yong-Hui. Comparative analysis of growth characteristics and climate responses in four coniferous tree species of southern Luoxiao Mountains [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(12): 1303-1313. |
[14] | LI Jing, WANG Xin, WANG Zhen-Hua, WANG Bin, WANG Cheng-Zhang, DENG Mei-Feng, LIU Ling-Li. Effects of ozone and aerosol pollution on photosynthesis of poplar leaves [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(8): 854-863. |
[15] | LI Xu, WU Ting, CHENG Yan, TAN Na-Dan, JIANG Fen, LIU Shi-Zhong, CHU Guo-Wei, MENG Ze, LIU Ju-Xiu. Ecophysiological adaptability of four tree species in the southern subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest to warming [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(12): 1203-1214. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn