Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 39-47.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.007
Special Issue: 生态化学计量
• Special feature: Ecological Stoichiometry • Previous Articles Next Articles
YIN Xiao-Rui1,2, LIANG Cun-Zhu1,*(), WANG Li-Xin1, WANG Wei1, LIU Zhong-Ling1, LIU Xiao-Ping1,3
Received:
2008-11-17
Accepted:
2009-04-23
Online:
2010-11-17
Published:
2010-01-01
Contact:
LIANG Cun-Zhu
YIN Xiao-Rui, LIANG Cun-Zhu, WANG Li-Xin, WANG Wei, LIU Zhong-Ling, LIU Xiao-Ping. Ecological stoichiometry of plant nutrients at different restoration succession stages in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(1): 39-47.
物 种 Species | 科 Family | 生活型 Life form | 采样时间(月.日) Time of sampling (month.day) |
---|---|---|---|
羊草 Leymus chinensis | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | 5.15, 6.18, 7.15, 8.19, 9.27 |
大针茅 Stipa grandis | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
米氏冰草 Agropyron michnoi | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
冷蒿 Artemisia frigida | 菊科 Compositae | 半灌木 Subshrub | |
星毛委陵菜 Potentilla acaulis | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
黄囊薹草 Carex korshinskyi | 莎草科 Cyperaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
小叶锦鸡儿 Caragana microphylla | 豆科 Fabaceae | 灌木 Shrub | |
双齿葱 Allium bidentatum | 百合科 Liliaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia | 鸢尾科 Iridaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb |
Table 1 Sampling species and sampling time
物 种 Species | 科 Family | 生活型 Life form | 采样时间(月.日) Time of sampling (month.day) |
---|---|---|---|
羊草 Leymus chinensis | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | 5.15, 6.18, 7.15, 8.19, 9.27 |
大针茅 Stipa grandis | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
米氏冰草 Agropyron michnoi | 禾本科 Gramineae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
冷蒿 Artemisia frigida | 菊科 Compositae | 半灌木 Subshrub | |
星毛委陵菜 Potentilla acaulis | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
黄囊薹草 Carex korshinskyi | 莎草科 Cyperaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
小叶锦鸡儿 Caragana microphylla | 豆科 Fabaceae | 灌木 Shrub | |
双齿葱 Allium bidentatum | 百合科 Liliaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb | |
细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia | 鸢尾科 Iridaceae | 多年生草本 Perennial herb |
Fig. 1 The soil nutrient condition of different soil layers in different succession stages in growing season. Different letters indicate siginificant difference at p < 0.05. SAN, soil available nitrogen; SAP, soil available phosphorus; SOC, soil organic carbon; STN, soil total nitrogen; STP, soil total phosphorus.
物种名 Species | 样地 Plot | 养分含量及其方差分析 Nutrient content and analysis of variance | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总有机碳 TOC (%) | 总氮 TN (%) | 总磷 TP (%) | N:P | C:N | |||||||
羊草 Leymus chinensis | XW | 52.57±0.15b | 1.08±0.01c | 0.11±0.00b | 9.99±0.30c | 48.76±0.36a | |||||
HF | 55.69±0.61a | 1.65±0.03b | 0.11±0.00b | 14.95±0.19a | 33.78±1.05b | ||||||
WLW | 54.98±0.19a | 1.93±0.05a | 0.16±0.00a | 12.15±0.10b | 28.51±0.68c | ||||||
大针茅 Stipa grandis | XW | 54.97±0.33a | 1.51±0.21b | 0.09±0.02b | 17.18±2.79b | 37.14±6.13a | |||||
HF | 56.06±0.20b | 1.69±0.08b | 0.08±0.00b | 20.79±0.65a | 33.19±1.61a | ||||||
WLW | 54.09±0.42c | 2.56±0.32a | 0.20±0.01a | 12.97±0.91c | 21.48±2.66b | ||||||
糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa | XW | 54.52±0.83a | 1.97±0.21b | 0.13±0.02b | 15.47±1.04a | 28.08±3.47a | |||||
HF | 55.35±0.52a | 2.22±0.09b | 0.14±0.01b | 15.33±0.49a | 25.05±0.90a | ||||||
WLW | 54.26±1.34a | 2.68±0.39a | 0.28±0.02a | 10.47±1.02b | 19.63±2.09b | ||||||
冷蒿 Artemisia frigida | XW | 55.67±1.31a | 2.25±0.19a | 0.20±0.03b | 11.36±0.97a | 24.94±1.81a | |||||
HF | 57.61±1.00b | 2.56±0.28a | 0.22±0.02ab | 11.77±0.32a | 22.71±2.17ab | ||||||
WLW | 51.09±0.68c | 2.54±0.18a | 0.25±0.02a | 10.06±0.85a | 20.25±1.34b | ||||||
星毛委陵菜 Potentilla acaulis | XW | 53.07±0.42a | 1.76±0.24b | 0.13±0.02a | 13.25±1.06a | 30.74±4.53a | |||||
HF | 52.53±0.66a | 2.03±0.12ab | 0.14±0.01a | 14.55±0.74a | 25.98±1.33ab | ||||||
WLW | 49.67±1.06b | 2.26±0.32a | 0.18±0.06a | 13.28±2.28a | 22.48±3.59b | ||||||
米氏冰草 Agropyron michooi | XW | 54.06±1.48a | 1.48±0.01b | 0.11±0.00b | 13.81±0.43b | 36.49±1.04a | |||||
HF | 55.65±0.75a | 1.87±0.20b | 0.10±0.01b | 19.15±0.86a | 29.92±3.17a | ||||||
WLW | 52.70±1.19a | 2.70±0.25a | 0.21±0.02a | 12.80±1.47b | 19.76±1.56b | ||||||
黄囊薹草 Carex korshinskyi | XW | 52.55±1.04a | 1.73±0.13b | 0.10±0.01c | 17.56±0.60a | 30.63±2.84a | |||||
HF | 53.13±0.43a | 1.96±0.06a | 0.12±0.01b | 16.66±0.37a | 27.16±0.26a | ||||||
WLW | 52.41±0.34a | 1.95±0.02a | 0.15±0.00a | 13.39±0.52b | 26.92±0.34a | ||||||
小叶锦鸡儿 Caragana microphylla | XW | 61.11±1.40a | 3.15±0.47a | 0.17±0.06a | 20.42±3.97a | 19.77±2.59a | |||||
HF | 58.38±1.20b | 2.80±0.16a | 0.13±0.01a | 22.27±0.79a | 20.92±0.81a | ||||||
WLW | 59.08±1.28b | 3.01±0.39a | 0.17±0.05a | 18.43±2.46a | 19.86±1.85a | ||||||
双齿葱 Allium bidentatum | XW | 54.11±0.46a | 2.53±0.29a | 0.18±0.02b | 13.76±1.61a | 22.31±2.54a | |||||
HF | 53.67±0.64a | 2.10±0.11a | 0.17±0.01b | 12.44±1.01a | 25.81±1.47a | ||||||
WLW | 48.91±0.47b | 2.20±0.33a | 0.25±0.03a | 8.72±1.07b | 22.70±3.03a | ||||||
细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia | XW | 52.24±0.54a | 1.41±0.09b | 0.08±0.01b | 16.56±0.07a | 37.21±2.39a | |||||
HF | 52.85±0.60a | 1.72±0.03a | 0.09±0.01b | 18.42±1.32a | 30.83±0.79b | ||||||
WLW | 51.82±0.46a | 1.94±0.08a | 0.21±0.01a | 9.34±0.68b | 26.79±1.37b |
Table 2 The test of significance of every nutrient index distribution difference of 10 plants in different restoring succession stages (mean ± SD)
物种名 Species | 样地 Plot | 养分含量及其方差分析 Nutrient content and analysis of variance | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总有机碳 TOC (%) | 总氮 TN (%) | 总磷 TP (%) | N:P | C:N | |||||||
羊草 Leymus chinensis | XW | 52.57±0.15b | 1.08±0.01c | 0.11±0.00b | 9.99±0.30c | 48.76±0.36a | |||||
HF | 55.69±0.61a | 1.65±0.03b | 0.11±0.00b | 14.95±0.19a | 33.78±1.05b | ||||||
WLW | 54.98±0.19a | 1.93±0.05a | 0.16±0.00a | 12.15±0.10b | 28.51±0.68c | ||||||
大针茅 Stipa grandis | XW | 54.97±0.33a | 1.51±0.21b | 0.09±0.02b | 17.18±2.79b | 37.14±6.13a | |||||
HF | 56.06±0.20b | 1.69±0.08b | 0.08±0.00b | 20.79±0.65a | 33.19±1.61a | ||||||
WLW | 54.09±0.42c | 2.56±0.32a | 0.20±0.01a | 12.97±0.91c | 21.48±2.66b | ||||||
糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa | XW | 54.52±0.83a | 1.97±0.21b | 0.13±0.02b | 15.47±1.04a | 28.08±3.47a | |||||
HF | 55.35±0.52a | 2.22±0.09b | 0.14±0.01b | 15.33±0.49a | 25.05±0.90a | ||||||
WLW | 54.26±1.34a | 2.68±0.39a | 0.28±0.02a | 10.47±1.02b | 19.63±2.09b | ||||||
冷蒿 Artemisia frigida | XW | 55.67±1.31a | 2.25±0.19a | 0.20±0.03b | 11.36±0.97a | 24.94±1.81a | |||||
HF | 57.61±1.00b | 2.56±0.28a | 0.22±0.02ab | 11.77±0.32a | 22.71±2.17ab | ||||||
WLW | 51.09±0.68c | 2.54±0.18a | 0.25±0.02a | 10.06±0.85a | 20.25±1.34b | ||||||
星毛委陵菜 Potentilla acaulis | XW | 53.07±0.42a | 1.76±0.24b | 0.13±0.02a | 13.25±1.06a | 30.74±4.53a | |||||
HF | 52.53±0.66a | 2.03±0.12ab | 0.14±0.01a | 14.55±0.74a | 25.98±1.33ab | ||||||
WLW | 49.67±1.06b | 2.26±0.32a | 0.18±0.06a | 13.28±2.28a | 22.48±3.59b | ||||||
米氏冰草 Agropyron michooi | XW | 54.06±1.48a | 1.48±0.01b | 0.11±0.00b | 13.81±0.43b | 36.49±1.04a | |||||
HF | 55.65±0.75a | 1.87±0.20b | 0.10±0.01b | 19.15±0.86a | 29.92±3.17a | ||||||
WLW | 52.70±1.19a | 2.70±0.25a | 0.21±0.02a | 12.80±1.47b | 19.76±1.56b | ||||||
黄囊薹草 Carex korshinskyi | XW | 52.55±1.04a | 1.73±0.13b | 0.10±0.01c | 17.56±0.60a | 30.63±2.84a | |||||
HF | 53.13±0.43a | 1.96±0.06a | 0.12±0.01b | 16.66±0.37a | 27.16±0.26a | ||||||
WLW | 52.41±0.34a | 1.95±0.02a | 0.15±0.00a | 13.39±0.52b | 26.92±0.34a | ||||||
小叶锦鸡儿 Caragana microphylla | XW | 61.11±1.40a | 3.15±0.47a | 0.17±0.06a | 20.42±3.97a | 19.77±2.59a | |||||
HF | 58.38±1.20b | 2.80±0.16a | 0.13±0.01a | 22.27±0.79a | 20.92±0.81a | ||||||
WLW | 59.08±1.28b | 3.01±0.39a | 0.17±0.05a | 18.43±2.46a | 19.86±1.85a | ||||||
双齿葱 Allium bidentatum | XW | 54.11±0.46a | 2.53±0.29a | 0.18±0.02b | 13.76±1.61a | 22.31±2.54a | |||||
HF | 53.67±0.64a | 2.10±0.11a | 0.17±0.01b | 12.44±1.01a | 25.81±1.47a | ||||||
WLW | 48.91±0.47b | 2.20±0.33a | 0.25±0.03a | 8.72±1.07b | 22.70±3.03a | ||||||
细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia | XW | 52.24±0.54a | 1.41±0.09b | 0.08±0.01b | 16.56±0.07a | 37.21±2.39a | |||||
HF | 52.85±0.60a | 1.72±0.03a | 0.09±0.01b | 18.42±1.32a | 30.83±0.79b | ||||||
WLW | 51.82±0.46a | 1.94±0.08a | 0.21±0.01a | 9.34±0.68b | 26.79±1.37b |
[1] | Agricultural Biochemistry Committee of Chinese Soil Society (中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会) (1983). Routine Analysis Method of Soil Agricultural Chemistry (土壤农业化学常规分析方法). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[2] |
Drenovsky RE, Richards JH (2004). Critical N:P values: predicting nutrient deficiencies in desert shrublands. Plant and Soil, 259, 59-69.
DOI URL |
[3] | Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl D, Mackay NA, Schampel JH (1996). Organism size, life history, and N:P cycle. Biogeochemistry, 37, 237-252. |
[4] | Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Gorokhova E, Fagan WF, Markow TA, Cotner JB, Harrison JF, Hobbie SE, Odell GM, Weider LW (2000). Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 3, 540-550. |
[5] | Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Markow T, Watts T, Hobbie S, Fagan W, Schade J, Hood J, Sterner RW (2003). Growth rate—stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecology Letters, 6, 936-943. |
[6] | Gao SP (高三平), Li JX (李俊祥), Xu MC (徐明策), Chen X (陈熙), Dai J (戴洁) (2007). Leaf N and P stoichiometry of common species in successional stages of the evergreen broad-leaved forest in Tiantong National Forest Park, Zhejiang Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 947-952. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Gao Y, Wang DL, Ba L, Bai YG, Liu B (2008). Interactions between herbivory and resource availability on grazing tolerance of Leymus chinensis. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63, 113-122. |
[8] | Güsewell S, Koerselman W, Verhoeven JTA (2003). Biomass N:P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitation for plant populations in wetlands. Ecological Monographs, 13, 372-384. |
[9] | Güsewell S (2004). N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243-266. |
[10] | Güsewell S (2005). High nitrogen: phosphorus ratios reduce nutrient retention and second-year growth of wetland sedges. New Phytologist, 166, 537-550. |
[11] | Güsewell S, Bailey KM, Roem WJ, Bedford BL (2005). Nutrient limitation and botanical diversity in wetlands: can fertilization raise species richness? Oikos, 109, 71-80. |
[12] | Han WX, Fang JY, Guo DL, Zhang Y (2005). Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytologist, 168, 377-385. |
[13] |
He JS, Fang JY, Wang ZH, Guo DL, Flynn DFB, Geng Z (2006). Stoichiometry and large-scale patterns of leaf carbon and nitrogen in the grassland biomes of China. Oecologia, 149, 115-122.
DOI URL PMID |
[14] |
He JS, Wang L, Flynn DFB, Wang XP, Ma WH, Fang JY (2008). Leaf nitrogen:phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes. Oecologia, 155, 301-310.
DOI URL PMID |
[15] |
Hessen DO (1997). Stoichiometry in food webs—Latka revistted. Oikos, 79, 195-200.
DOI URL |
[16] |
Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450.
DOI URL |
[17] | Liu ZL (刘钟龄), Wang W (王炜), Liang CZ (梁存柱), Hao DY (郝敦元) (1998). The regressive succession pattern and its diagnostic of Inner Mongolia steppe in sustained and superstrong grazing. Acta Agrestia Sinica (草地学报), 6, 244-251. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Liu ZL (刘钟龄), Wang W (王炜), Hao DY (郝敦元), Liang CZ (梁存柱) (2002). Probes on the degeneration and recovery succession mechanisms of Inner Mongolia steppe. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 26, 84-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Makino W, Cotner JB, Sterner RW, Else JJ (2003). Are bacteria more like animals than plants? Growth rate and resource dependence of bacterial C:N:P stoichiometry. Functional Ecology, 17, 121-130. |
[20] | Piao HC (朴河春), Liu CQ (刘丛强), Zhu SF (朱书法), Zhu JM (朱建明) (2005). Variations of C4 and C3 plant N:P ratios influenced by nutrient stoichiometry in limestone and sandstone arears of Guizhou. Quaternary Science (第四纪研究), 25, 552-560. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 11001-11006. |
[22] | Tessier JT, Raynal DJ (2003). Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 523-534. |
[23] | Vanni MJ, Flecker AS, Hood JM, Headworth JL (2002). Stoichiometry of nutrient recycling by vertebrates in a tropical stream: linking biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ecology Letters, 5, 285-293. |
[24] | Verhoeven JTA, Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). Nitrogen or phosphorus-limited growth in herbaceous, wet vegetation: relations with atmospheric inputs and management regimes. Trees, 11, 494-497. |
[25] | Wang W (王炜), Liang CZ (梁存柱), Liu ZL (刘钟龄), Hao DY (郝敦元) (2000). Mechanism of degradation succession in Leymus chinensis + Stipa grandis steppe community. Acta Phytoecoiogica Sinica (植物生态学报), 24, 468-472. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Yan ER (阎恩荣), Wang XH (王希华), Zhou W (周武) (2008). N:P stoichiometry in secondary succession in evergreen broad-leaved forest, Tiantong, East China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 32, 13-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Zhang LX, Bai YF, Han XG (2003). Application of N:P stoichiometry to ecology studies. Acta Botanica Sinica, 45, 1009-1018. |
[28] | Zhang LX, Bai YF, Han XG (2004). Differential responses of N:P stoichiometry of Leymus chinensis and Carex korshinskyi to N additions in a steppe ecosystem in Nei Mongol. Acta Botanica Sinica, 46, 259-270. |
[1] | Wei-Wei SHE Qin shugao Yan-Gui QIAO Yuqing Zhang. Effects of nitrogen and water addition on leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of dominant species in an Artemisia ordosica community [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(5): 590-600. |
[2] | YANG An-Na, LI Zeng-Yan, MOU Ling, YANG Bai-Yu, SAI Bi-Le, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Zeng-Ke, WANG Wan-Sheng, DU Yun-Cai, YOU Wen-Hui, YAN En-Rong. Variation in soil bacterial community across vegetation types in Dajinshan Island, Shanghai [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(3): 377-389. |
[3] | NIU Yi-Di, CAI Ti-Jiu. Changes in species diversity and influencing factors in secondary forest succession in northern Da Hinggan Mountains [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(3): 349-363. |
[4] | RU Ya-Qian, XUE Jian-Guo, GE Ping, LI Yu-Lin, LI Dong-Xu, HAN Peng, YANG Tian-Run, CHU Wei, CHEN Zhang, ZHANG Xiao-Lin, LI Ang, HUANG Jian-Hui. Ecological and economic effects of intensive rotational grazing in a typical steppe [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(2): 171-179. |
[5] | HAN Lu, FENG Yu, LI Yuan-Kai, WANG Yu-Qing, WANG Hai-Zhen. Effects of groundwater depth on carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus ecological stoichiometric and homeostasis characteristics of Populus pruinosa leaves and soil in Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(1): 92-102. |
[6] | LI Zhao-Guang, YANG Wen-Gao, HE Gui-Qing, XU Tian-Cai, HE Qiong-Ji, HOU Zhi-Jiang, LI Yan, XUE Run-Guang. Phenological dynamics of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium stoichiometry in Chenopodium quinoa in northwest Yunnan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(5): 724-732. |
[7] | LIN Shao-Ying, ZENG Yu, YANG Wen-Wen, CHEN Bin, RUAN Min-Min, YIN Xiao-Lei, YANG Xiang, WANG Wei-Qi. Effects of straw and biochar addition on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry in Jasminum sambac plant and soil [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(4): 530-545. |
[8] | LIU Jing, GOU Qian-Qian, WANG Guo-Hua, ZHAO Feng-Xia. Leaf and soil ecological stoichiometry of Caragana korshinskii in windy and sandy hilly region of northwest Shanxi, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(4): 546-558. |
[9] | ZHAO Rong-Jiang, CHEN Tao, DONG Li-Jia, GUO Hui, MA Hai-Kun, SONG Xu, WANG Ming-Gang, XUE Wei, YANG Qiang. Progress of plant-soil feedback in ecology studies [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1333-1355. |
[10] | WANG De-Li, LIANG Cun-Zhu. Restoration state of degraded grasslands: climate climax or disturbance climax? [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1464-1470. |
[11] | ZHENG Ning, LI Su-Ying, WANG Xin-Ting, LÜ Shi-Hai, ZHAO Peng-Cheng, ZANG Chen, XU Yu-Long, HE Jing, QIN Wen-Hao, GAO Heng-Rui. Dominance of different plant life forms in the typical steppe evidenced from impacts of environmental factors on chlorophyll [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 951-960. |
[12] | WU Zan, PENG Yun-Feng, YANG Gui-Biao, LI Qin-Lu, LIU Yang, MA Li-Hua, YANG Yuan-He, JIANG Xian-Jun. Effects of land degradation on soil and microbial stoichiometry in Qingzang Plateau alpine grasslands [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(4): 461-472. |
[13] | HUANG Kuai-Kuai, HU Gang, PANG Qing-Ling, ZHANG Bei, HE Ye-Yong, HU Cong, XU Chao-Hao, ZHANG Zhong-Hua. Effects of grazing on species composition and community structure of shrub tussock in subtropical karst mountains, southwest China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(11): 1350-1363. |
[14] | LI Xiao-Long, ZHOU Jun, PENG Fei, ZHONG Hong-Tao, Hans LAMBERS. Temporal trends of plant nutrient-acquisition strategies with soil age and their ecological significance [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(7): 714-727. |
[15] | YIN Xiao-Lei, LIU Xu-Yang, JIN Qiang, LI Xian-De, LIN Shao-Ying, YANG Xiang, WANG Wei-Qi, ZHANG Yong-Xun. Effects of different management methods on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents and their stoichiometric ratios in tea plants [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(7): 749-759. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn