Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 303-310.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00303
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Wan-Long1, SUN Zhi-Gao1,2,*(), LIN Guang-Hui2, MU Xiao-Jie1,3,4, WANG Ling-Ling1,3
Received:
2010-03-29
Accepted:
2010-12-12
Online:
2011-03-29
Published:
2011-03-02
Contact:
SUN Zhi-Gao
SUN Wan-Long, SUN Zhi-Gao, LIN Guang-Hui, MU Xiao-Jie, WANG Ling-Ling. Seasonal variations of sulfur in Suaeda salsa under different habitats in the intertidal zone of Yellow River Estuary, China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(3): 303-310.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00303
Fig. 1 Seasonal dynamics of aboveground and belowground biomass of different organs of Suaeda salsa. JP1, Suaeda salsa in middle tidal flat; JP2, S. salsa in low tidal flat. ▼地上部分 Aboveground part ■地下部分 Belowground part □ 叶+果实 Leaf + fruit ● 茎 Stem ☆ 枯落物 Litter
月份 Month | 5月 May | 6月 June | 7月 July | 8月 Aug. | 9月 Sept. | 10月 Oct. | 11月 Nov. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JP1 | 3.067 | 3.095 | 4.780 | 5.999 | 6.104 | 5.170 | 0.903 |
JP2 | 3.863 | 4.359 | 6.427 | 8.735 | 9.958 | 7.975 | 8.194 |
Table 1 Ratios (rA/B) of aboveground biomass to belowground biomass of Suaeda salsa
月份 Month | 5月 May | 6月 June | 7月 July | 8月 Aug. | 9月 Sept. | 10月 Oct. | 11月 Nov. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JP1 | 3.067 | 3.095 | 4.780 | 5.999 | 6.104 | 5.170 | 0.903 |
JP2 | 3.863 | 4.359 | 6.427 | 8.735 | 9.958 | 7.975 | 8.194 |
Fig. 2 Changes of total sulfur content in roots, stem, leaves and litter of Suaeda salsa. JP1, Suaeda salsa in middle tidal flat; JP2, S. salsa in low tidal flat. ■根 Root □ 茎 Stem ● 叶 Leaf ▽ 枯落物 Litter
类型 Type | 项目 Item | 模拟模型 Simulation model | R2 | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP1 | 茎 Stem | Y = 0.017t3 - 5.9340t2 + 508.6t + 1362 | 0.760 7 | <0.01 |
叶 Leaf | Y = 0.0101t3 - 4.0105t2 + 426.94t + 208.93 | 0.707 5 | <0.01 | |
根 Root | Y = 3176.9exp(- 0.0053t) + 119.5136 | 0.433 0 | <0.01 | |
枯落物 Litter | Y = 189531.3871exp(- t/10.6423) + 10602.3751 | 0.838 0 | <0.05 | |
JP2 | 茎 Stem | Y = 0.0122t3 - 4.2986t2 + 373.86t + 1278.7 | 0.730 5 | <0.01 |
叶 Leaf | Y = 0.0220t3 - 7.8066t2 + 682.4t + 5135.4 | 0.610 9 | <0.01 | |
根 Root | Y = 2109.6exp (- 0.0031t) + 207.596 | 0.489 2 | <0.05 | |
枯落物 Litter | Y = 39293.4172exp (- t/23.0488) + 8266.8818 | 0.816 0 | <0.05 |
Table 2 Models of simulating the dynamics of total sulfur content in different parts of Suaeda salsa
类型 Type | 项目 Item | 模拟模型 Simulation model | R2 | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP1 | 茎 Stem | Y = 0.017t3 - 5.9340t2 + 508.6t + 1362 | 0.760 7 | <0.01 |
叶 Leaf | Y = 0.0101t3 - 4.0105t2 + 426.94t + 208.93 | 0.707 5 | <0.01 | |
根 Root | Y = 3176.9exp(- 0.0053t) + 119.5136 | 0.433 0 | <0.01 | |
枯落物 Litter | Y = 189531.3871exp(- t/10.6423) + 10602.3751 | 0.838 0 | <0.05 | |
JP2 | 茎 Stem | Y = 0.0122t3 - 4.2986t2 + 373.86t + 1278.7 | 0.730 5 | <0.01 |
叶 Leaf | Y = 0.0220t3 - 7.8066t2 + 682.4t + 5135.4 | 0.610 9 | <0.01 | |
根 Root | Y = 2109.6exp (- 0.0031t) + 207.596 | 0.489 2 | <0.05 | |
枯落物 Litter | Y = 39293.4172exp (- t/23.0488) + 8266.8818 | 0.816 0 | <0.05 |
类型 Type | 日期 Date (month-day) | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶+果实 Leaf + fruit | 枯落物 Litter | 总计 Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | ||||||
JP1 | 5-17 | 0.15 | 5.69 | 0.25 | 9.27 | 0.36 | 13.38 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.76 | 28.43 | ||||
6-1 | 0.11 | -3.10 | 0.69 | -3.80 | 1.26 | 26.80 | 0.06 | 3.76 | 2.12 | 16.70 | |||||
7-11 | 0.19 | 1.96 | 2.41 | 43.13 | 1.72 | 11.48 | 0.52 | 11.55 | 4.84 | 68.12 | |||||
8-9 | 0.20 | 0.46 | 2.30 | 31.06 | 2.49 | 64.05 | 1.10 | 20.04 | 6.09 | 95.77 | |||||
8-31 | 0.19 | -0.40 | 1.92 | -17.50 | 2.36 | -6.20 | 1.15 | 2.55 | 5.62 | -21.15 | |||||
9-20 | 0.19 | -0.10 | 2.20 | 14.31 | 2.41 | 2.81 | 2.17 | 50.60 | 6.97 | 67.72 | |||||
10-19 | 0.12 | - 2.50 | 1.25 | -31.80 | 1.74 | -22.40 | 0.88 | -1 286.00 | 3.99 | -1 342.70 | |||||
11-15 | 0.13 | 0.53 | 0.09 | -41.40 | 0.13 | -57.60 | 3.67 | 99.76 | 4.02 | 0.76 | |||||
JP2 | 5-17 | 0.02 | 0.61 | 0.07 | 2.58 | 0.21 | 2.58 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 5.23 | ||||
6-1 | 0.04 | 1.42 | 0.43 | 25.55 | 1.22 | 72.40 | 0.37 | 26.07 | 2.05 | 125.44 | |||||
7-11 | 0.02 | -0.40 | 0.75 | 8.00 | 3.60 | 59.49 | 0.11 | -6.55 | 4.48 | 60.94 | |||||
8-9 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.37 | -12.90 | 0.59 | -103.80 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 1.09 | -116.63 | |||||
8-31 | 0.03 | -0.20 | 0.25 | -5.80 | 1.12 | 24.04 | 0.09 | -0.36 | 1.49 | 17.88 | |||||
9-20 | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.26 | 0. 47 | 1.10 | -1.20 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 1.49 | -0.84 | |||||
10-19 | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.20 | -1.90 | 0.90 | -6.70 | 0.12 | 0.49 | 1.26 | -8.60 | |||||
11-15 | 0.01 | -0.80 | 0.15 | -1.80 | 0.37 | -19.00 | 0.28 | 5.45 | 0.81 | -15.35 |
Table 3 Variations of sulfur accumulation amount and accumulation rate in different parts of Suaeda salsa
类型 Type | 日期 Date (month-day) | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶+果实 Leaf + fruit | 枯落物 Litter | 总计 Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | A | B (×10-3) | ||||||
JP1 | 5-17 | 0.15 | 5.69 | 0.25 | 9.27 | 0.36 | 13.38 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.76 | 28.43 | ||||
6-1 | 0.11 | -3.10 | 0.69 | -3.80 | 1.26 | 26.80 | 0.06 | 3.76 | 2.12 | 16.70 | |||||
7-11 | 0.19 | 1.96 | 2.41 | 43.13 | 1.72 | 11.48 | 0.52 | 11.55 | 4.84 | 68.12 | |||||
8-9 | 0.20 | 0.46 | 2.30 | 31.06 | 2.49 | 64.05 | 1.10 | 20.04 | 6.09 | 95.77 | |||||
8-31 | 0.19 | -0.40 | 1.92 | -17.50 | 2.36 | -6.20 | 1.15 | 2.55 | 5.62 | -21.15 | |||||
9-20 | 0.19 | -0.10 | 2.20 | 14.31 | 2.41 | 2.81 | 2.17 | 50.60 | 6.97 | 67.72 | |||||
10-19 | 0.12 | - 2.50 | 1.25 | -31.80 | 1.74 | -22.40 | 0.88 | -1 286.00 | 3.99 | -1 342.70 | |||||
11-15 | 0.13 | 0.53 | 0.09 | -41.40 | 0.13 | -57.60 | 3.67 | 99.76 | 4.02 | 0.76 | |||||
JP2 | 5-17 | 0.02 | 0.61 | 0.07 | 2.58 | 0.21 | 2.58 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 5.23 | ||||
6-1 | 0.04 | 1.42 | 0.43 | 25.55 | 1.22 | 72.40 | 0.37 | 26.07 | 2.05 | 125.44 | |||||
7-11 | 0.02 | -0.40 | 0.75 | 8.00 | 3.60 | 59.49 | 0.11 | -6.55 | 4.48 | 60.94 | |||||
8-9 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.37 | -12.90 | 0.59 | -103.80 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 1.09 | -116.63 | |||||
8-31 | 0.03 | -0.20 | 0.25 | -5.80 | 1.12 | 24.04 | 0.09 | -0.36 | 1.49 | 17.88 | |||||
9-20 | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.26 | 0. 47 | 1.10 | -1.20 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 1.49 | -0.84 | |||||
10-19 | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.20 | -1.90 | 0.90 | -6.70 | 0.12 | 0.49 | 1.26 | -8.60 | |||||
11-15 | 0.01 | -0.80 | 0.15 | -1.80 | 0.37 | -19.00 | 0.28 | 5.45 | 0.81 | -15.35 |
类型 Type | 日期 Date | 地上部分 Aboveground | 合计 Total | 地下部分 Belowground | 枯落物 Litter | 总计 Sum | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎 Stem | 叶+果实 Leaf + fruit | 根 Root | |||||
JP1 | 5-17 | 32.64 | 47.09 | 79.73 | 20.01 | >0.26 | 100 |
6-1 | 32.50 | 59.66 | 92.16 | 5.23 | >2.61 | 100 | |
7-11 | 49.87 | 35.52 | 85.40 | 3.91 | >10.70 | 100 | |
8-9 | 37.74 | 40.92 | 78.67 | 3.32 | >18.02 | 100 | |
8-31 | 34.08 | 41.96 | 76.04 | 3.43 | >20.53 | 100 | |
9-20 | 31.57 | 34.63 | 66.21 | 2.72 | >31.07 | 100 | |
10-19 | 31.29 | 43.72 | 75.01 | 2.90 | >22.09 | 100 | |
11-15 | 2.14 | 3.21 | 5.34 | 3.25 | >91.41 | 100 | |
JP2 | 5-17 | 23.35 | 70.44 | 93.79 | 5.53 | >0.67 | 100 |
6-1 | 20.78 | 59.57 | 80.37 | 1.78 | >17.86 | 100 | |
7-11 | 16.70 | 80.48 | 97.18 | 0.48 | >2.35 | 100 | |
8-9 | 33.82 | 53.60 | 87.42 | 2.92 | >9.65 | 100 | |
8-31 | 16.62 | 75.41 | 92.04 | 1.92 | >6.04 | 100 | |
9-20 | 17.25 | 73.72 | 90.97 | 1.85 | >7.18 | 100 | |
10-19 | 15.96 | 71.46 | 87.42 | 2.88 | >9.70 | 100 | |
11-15 | 18.69 | 45.49 | 64.17 | 1.81 | >34.02 | 100 |
Table 4 Sulfur allocation in different parts of Suaeda salsa in different habitats (%)
类型 Type | 日期 Date | 地上部分 Aboveground | 合计 Total | 地下部分 Belowground | 枯落物 Litter | 总计 Sum | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎 Stem | 叶+果实 Leaf + fruit | 根 Root | |||||
JP1 | 5-17 | 32.64 | 47.09 | 79.73 | 20.01 | >0.26 | 100 |
6-1 | 32.50 | 59.66 | 92.16 | 5.23 | >2.61 | 100 | |
7-11 | 49.87 | 35.52 | 85.40 | 3.91 | >10.70 | 100 | |
8-9 | 37.74 | 40.92 | 78.67 | 3.32 | >18.02 | 100 | |
8-31 | 34.08 | 41.96 | 76.04 | 3.43 | >20.53 | 100 | |
9-20 | 31.57 | 34.63 | 66.21 | 2.72 | >31.07 | 100 | |
10-19 | 31.29 | 43.72 | 75.01 | 2.90 | >22.09 | 100 | |
11-15 | 2.14 | 3.21 | 5.34 | 3.25 | >91.41 | 100 | |
JP2 | 5-17 | 23.35 | 70.44 | 93.79 | 5.53 | >0.67 | 100 |
6-1 | 20.78 | 59.57 | 80.37 | 1.78 | >17.86 | 100 | |
7-11 | 16.70 | 80.48 | 97.18 | 0.48 | >2.35 | 100 | |
8-9 | 33.82 | 53.60 | 87.42 | 2.92 | >9.65 | 100 | |
8-31 | 16.62 | 75.41 | 92.04 | 1.92 | >6.04 | 100 | |
9-20 | 17.25 | 73.72 | 90.97 | 1.85 | >7.18 | 100 | |
10-19 | 15.96 | 71.46 | 87.42 | 2.88 | >9.70 | 100 | |
11-15 | 18.69 | 45.49 | 64.17 | 1.81 | >34.02 | 100 |
类型 Type | 层次 Layer (cm) | 电导率 Electrical conductivity (μs·cm-1) | 土壤温度 Soil temperature (℃) | 有机质 Organic matter (%) | 水分 Water (%) | pH | NO3--N (mg?kg-1) | NH4+-N (mg·kg-1) | 总氮 Total N (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JP1 | 0 | 5.58 ± 2.80 | 22.45 ± 2.68 | 1.01 | 31.42 ± 3.90 | 8.49 | 1.40 | 3.47 | 576.69 |
10 | 11.52 ± 2.29 | 16.61 ± 1.57 | 0.48 | 42.80 ± 1.20 | 8.61 | 0.90 | 1.87 | 293.83 | |
20 | 9.83 ± 0.94 | 13.43 ± 0.51 | 0.46 | 43.97 ± 1.03 | 9.44 | 0.44 | 1.40 | 245.01 | |
JP2 | 0 | 18.07 ± 0.43 | 23.63 ± 1.14 | 0.63 | 36.27 ± 1.61 | 8.82 | 1.18 | 1.70 | 371.80 |
10 | 7.85 ± 0.75 | 21.10 ± 0.94 | 1.13 | 46.66 ± 0.87 | 8.89 | 1.82 | 3.77 | 617.97 | |
20 | 6.96 ± 0.84 | 16.08 ± 0.67 | 0.39 | 45.08 ± 1.14 | 9.05 | 0.72 | 1.66 | 263.92 |
Table 5 Comparisons of environmental conditions of two types of Suaeda salsa wetland
类型 Type | 层次 Layer (cm) | 电导率 Electrical conductivity (μs·cm-1) | 土壤温度 Soil temperature (℃) | 有机质 Organic matter (%) | 水分 Water (%) | pH | NO3--N (mg?kg-1) | NH4+-N (mg·kg-1) | 总氮 Total N (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JP1 | 0 | 5.58 ± 2.80 | 22.45 ± 2.68 | 1.01 | 31.42 ± 3.90 | 8.49 | 1.40 | 3.47 | 576.69 |
10 | 11.52 ± 2.29 | 16.61 ± 1.57 | 0.48 | 42.80 ± 1.20 | 8.61 | 0.90 | 1.87 | 293.83 | |
20 | 9.83 ± 0.94 | 13.43 ± 0.51 | 0.46 | 43.97 ± 1.03 | 9.44 | 0.44 | 1.40 | 245.01 | |
JP2 | 0 | 18.07 ± 0.43 | 23.63 ± 1.14 | 0.63 | 36.27 ± 1.61 | 8.82 | 1.18 | 1.70 | 371.80 |
10 | 7.85 ± 0.75 | 21.10 ± 0.94 | 1.13 | 46.66 ± 0.87 | 8.89 | 1.82 | 3.77 | 617.97 | |
20 | 6.96 ± 0.84 | 16.08 ± 0.67 | 0.39 | 45.08 ± 1.14 | 9.05 | 0.72 | 1.66 | 263.92 |
[1] | Hao QJ (郝庆菊), Wang QC (王起超), Wang YS (王跃思) (2003). The content characteristics of sulfur in typical wetland ecologies of Sanjiang Plain. Ecology and Environment (生态环境), 12, 401-404. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | He HB (贺海波), Li Y (李彦) (2008). Study on measures of biomass allocation of two desert halophyte species under drought and salt stress. Arid Zone Research (干旱区研究), 25, 242-247. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] |
Handoo JK, Kaul V (1982). Standing crop and nutrient dynamics in Sparganium ramosum Huds. in Kashmir. Aquatic Botany, 12, 375-387.
DOI URL |
[4] | Luther GW, Church TM (1988). Seasonal cycling of sulfur and iron in porewaters of a Delaware salt marsh. Marine Chemistry, 33, 295-309. |
[5] | Li XH (李新华) (2007). Study on Speciation Distribution and Transformation Processes of Sulfur in D. angustifolia Wetland Soils in Sanjiang Plain. (三江平原小叶章湿地土壤硫的形态分布和转化过程研究). PhD dissertation, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Li XH (李新华), Liu JS (刘景双), Sun ZG (孙志高) (2007). Distribution and seasonal dynamics of sulfur in the plant- soil system in the Calamagrostis angustifolia wetland in the Sanjiang Plain. Chinese Journal of Soil Science (土壤通报), 38(1), 85-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Liu Y (刘彧), Ding TL (丁同楼), Wang BS (王宝山) (2006). Study on the leaf succulence of Suaeda salsa under different natural saline environments. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition) (山东师范大学学报(自然科学版)), 21, 102-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] |
Mandernack KW, Lynch L, Krouse HR, Morgan MD (2000). Sulfur cycling in wetland peat of the New Jersey Pinelands and its effect on stream water chemistry. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 64, 3949-3964.
DOI URL |
[9] | Mu XJ (牟晓杰), Sun ZG (孙志高), Wang LL (王玲玲), Sun WL (孙万龙) (2010a). Seasonal changes of potassium, calcium and magnesium content and accumulation in different ecotype Suaeda salsa communities in tidal flat of Yellow River Estuary. Acta Prataculturae Sinica (草业学报), 19, 177-190. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Mu XJ (牟晓杰), Sun ZG (孙志高), Wang LL (王玲玲), Dong HF (董洪芳) (2010b). Characteristics of nitrogen accumulation and allocation of Suaeda salsa in different growth conditions of intertidal zone in Yellow River Estuary. Wetland Science (湿地科学), 8, 57-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Mu XJ (牟晓杰) (2010). Study on the Nitrogen Biological Cycling Characteristics and Cycling Model of Tidal Wetland Ecosystem in Yellow River Estuary (黄河口滨岸潮滩湿地系统氮生物循环特征与循环模式研究). Master degree dissertation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai. (in Chinese) |
[12] | Tang LZ (唐罗忠), Xu XZ (徐锡增), Cheng SW (程淑婉) (1998). Effects of flooding stresses on biomass and physiological properties of poplar clones. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (南京林业大学学报), 22(2), 14-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] |
Thamdrup B, Fossing H, Jorgensen BB (1994). Manganese, iron and sulfur cycling in a coastal marine sediment, Aarhus Bay, Denmark. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58, 5115-5129.
DOI URL |
[14] | Woodmansee RG, Duncan DA (1980). Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics and budgets in annual grasslands. Ecology, 6, 893-904. |
[15] | Wang HM (王海梅), Li ZH (李政海), Song GB (宋国宝), Gao JX (高吉喜), Yan J (闫军) (2006). The correlation among vegetation distribution, land use type and soil character in Yellow River Delta. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis NeiMongol (内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 37, 69-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Wang L (王琳), Yue XX (岳晓翔), Wang BS (王宝山) (2008). The comparative study on POD in the leaves of two different phenotype of Suaeda salsa L. grown under different natural conditions. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition). (山东师范大学学报(自然科学版)), 23(4), 103-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Zhang RG (1996). Study on sulfur accumulation and cycling in Mangrove forest in pear River mouth. Tropical and Subtropical Soil Science, 5(5), 67-73. |
[18] | Zhang WL (章文龙), Zeng CS (曾从盛), Zhang LH (张林海), Wang WQ (王维奇), Lin Y (林燕), Ai JQ (艾金泉) (2009). Seasonal dynamics of nitrogen- and phosphorus- absorption efficiency of wetland plants in Minjiang River Estuary. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 20, 1317-1322. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Zhang XC (张新春), Zhuang BC (庄炳昌), Li ZC (李自超) (2002). Advances in study of salt-stress tolerance in plants. Journal of Maize Sciences (玉米科学), 10(1), 50-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Zhou W (周卫), Lin B (林葆) (1997). The research of sulfur behavior in soils and plants. Soil and Fertilizers (土壤肥料), (5), 8-11. (in Chinese) |
[1] | LIANG Yi-Xian, WANG Chuan-Kuan, ZANG Miao-Han, SHANGGUAN Hong-Yu, LIU Yi-Xiao, QUAN Xian-Kui. Responses of radial growth and biomass allocation of Larix gmelinii to climate warming [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 459-468. |
[2] | HAN Da-Yong, LI Hai-Yan, ZHANG Wei, YANG Yun-Fei. Nutrient transportation and aging process of ramets in Aster pekinensis populations on Songnen grassland, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(2): 192-200. |
[3] | GENG Xue-Qi, TANG Ya-Kun, WANG Li-Na, DENG Xu, ZHANG Ze-Ling, ZHOU Ying. Nitrogen addition increases biomass but reduces nitrogen use efficiency of terrestrial plants in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(2): 147-157. |
[4] | WU Chen, CHEN Xin-Yi, LIU Yuan-Hao, HUANG Jin-Xue, XIONG De-Cheng. Effects of warming on fine root growth, mortality and turnover: a review [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1043-1054. |
[5] | CHEN Xin-Yi, WU Chen, HUANG Jin-Xue, XIONG De-Cheng. Effects of warming on fine root phenology of forests: a review [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1471-1482. |
[6] | LIU Yan-Jie, LIU Yu-Long, WANG Chuan-Kuan, WANG Xing-Chang. Comparison of leaf cost-benefit relationship for five pinnate compound-leaf tree species in temperate forests of northeast China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1540-1550. |
[7] | HAN Guang-Xuan, WANG Fa-Ming, MA Jun, XIAO Lei-Lei, CHU Xiao-Jing, ZHAO Ming-Liang. Blue carbon sink function, formation mechanism and sequestration potential of coastal salt marshes [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(4): 373-382. |
[8] | QIN Hui-Jun, JIAO Liang, ZHOU Yi, XUE Ru-Hong, QI Chang-Liang, DU Da-Shi. Effects of altitudes on non-structural carbohydrate allocation in different dominate trees in Qilian Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 208-219. |
[9] | YU Hai-Ying, YANG Li-Lin, FU Su-Jing, ZHANG Zhi-Min, YAO Qi-Fu. Response of leaf-unfolding dates of woody species to variation of chilling and heat accumulation in warm temperate forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(12): 1573-1584. |
[10] | Ning LIU, Shou-Zhang PENG, Yun-Ming CHEN. Temporal effects of climate factors on vegetation growth on the Qingzang Plateau, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(1): 18-26. |
[11] | LIN Xia-Zhen, LIU Lin, DONG Ting-Ting, FANG Qi-Bo, GUO Qing-Xue. Effects of non-structural carbohydrate and nitrogen allocation on the ability of Populus deltoides and P. cathayana to resist soil salinity stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(9): 961-971. |
[12] | SUN Jian, WANG Yi, LIU Guo-Hua. Linkages of aboveground plant carbon accumulation rate with ecosystem multifunctionality in alpine grassland, Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(5): 496-506. |
[13] | HAN Guang-Xuan, LI Juan-Yong, QU Wen-Di. Effects of nitrogen input on carbon cycle and carbon budget in a coastal salt marsh [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(4): 321-333. |
[14] | WANG Jiao, GUAN Xin, ZHANG Wei-Dong, HUANG Ke, ZHU Mu-Nan, YANG Qing-Peng. Responses of biomass allocation patterns to nitrogen addition of Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(11): 1231-1240. |
[15] | XING Lei, DUAN Na, LI Qing-He, LIU Cheng-Gong, LI Hui-Qing, SUN Gao-Jie. Variation in biomass allocation of Nitraria tangutorum during different phenological phases [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(7): 763-771. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn