植物生态学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 218-225.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0028
欧阳学军, 周国逸, 黄忠良*(), 褚国伟, 李炯, 尹光彩
收稿日期:
2003-09-16
接受日期:
2004-01-07
出版日期:
2005-09-16
发布日期:
2005-03-10
通讯作者:
黄忠良
作者简介:
*E-mail: huangzl@scib.ac.cn基金资助:
OUYANG Xue-Jun, ZHOU Guo-Yi, HUANG Zhong-Liang*(), CHU Guo-Wei, LI Jiong, YIN Guang-Cai
Received:
2003-09-16
Accepted:
2004-01-07
Online:
2005-09-16
Published:
2005-03-10
Contact:
HUANG Zhong-Liang
摘要:
2001年2月~ 2002年3月在鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林对大气降水、穿透水、土壤水 (30和 80cm层 ) 和溪水中的沉积元素进行监测, 拟通过不同水相元素浓度的比较及相关关系分析, 揭示系统的营养循环功能状况以及对区域化学条件变化的响应, 阐明因素在环境中的迁移转化规律。结果表明 :林冠与大气间强烈的相互作用, 极大地提高穿透水中Mn2 + 、Sr2 + 、K+ 、Mg2 + 、Ca2 + 浓度。水与土壤作用后, 极大地提高水相中Al3 + 的浓度。 30cm土壤溶液和溪水中的Al3 + 浓度分别是大气降水 (0.32 9mg·L-1) 的 4.8和 3.7倍。溪水中的Al3 + 主要来源于土壤的淋溶。大气降水平均Pb2 + 浓度为 0.0 6 2mg·L-1, 存在着一定程度的Pb2 + 污染, 其浓度分别是穿透水和溪水的 5倍和 10倍。林冠吸收和土壤过滤吸附是森林生态系统净化Pb2 + 等重金属污染物的主要过程。大气降水、穿透水、土壤水和溪水中Na+的浓度逐步增加, 但增幅不大。元素浓度的变异系数在 5 1.1%~ 2 36.7%之间。水相中的离子浓度与雨量有关, 大气降水、穿透水、土壤水中的沉积元素浓度大部分是干季大于湿季, 而溪水中是干季小于或近等于湿季。元素相关分析发现, 与元素Mg相关的元素最多, 穿透水所含相关元素对最多, 不同水相间元素相关状况差异与其元素的来源和外部环境条件有关系。Pb与金属元素Al、Mn在大气降水中极显著相关, MnAl、MnMg、MgK在所有水相中显著相关, AlSr、MnSr、CaK、CaMg在除溪水外的所有水相中显著相关, NaK、NaMg在除大气降水外的所有水相中显著相关, 而PbNa、PbK在所有水相中都无相关关系。结果说明, 季风常绿阔叶林系统已经遭受一定的外界环境压力, 但是其物质循环功能依然稳定。
欧阳学军, 周国逸, 黄忠良, 褚国伟, 李炯, 尹光彩. 鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林水相沉积元素分布及其相关性研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(2): 218-225. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0028
OUYANG Xue-Jun, ZHOU Guo-Yi, HUANG Zhong-Liang, CHU Guo-Wei, LI Jiong, YIN Guang-Cai. CHANGES IN SOLUTION CHEMISTRY OF EIGHT INORGANIC ELEMENTS IN A MONSOON EVERGREEN BROAD-LEAVED FOREST IN DINGHUSHAN. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(2): 218-225. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0028
水相类型 Liquid phase (LP) | Al3+ | Mn2+ | Sr2+ | Pb2+ | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大气降水 (PR) Precipitation n=24 | 0.329 0 (0.78) 236.7 | 0.029 5 (0.05) 184.3 | 0.004 5 (0.005) 114.7 | 0.062 0 (0.068) 110.3 | 0.320 2 (0.31) 98.3 | 0.507 8 (0.68) 133.3 | 0.109 8 (0.13) 117.8 | 0.831 4 (0.82) 98.1 |
穿透水 (TF) Throughfall n=23 | 0.393 3 (0.40) 101.8 | 0.237 2 (0.21) 88.7 | 0.022 4 (0.036) 162.4 | 0.012 5 (0.010) 81.5 | 0.524 7 (0.34) 64.4 | 6.663 6 (4.01) 105.1 | 0.809 6 (0.83) 102.0 | 3.291 6 (3.39) 103.0 |
土壤水30 cm (SW30) Soil water of 30 cm in depth n=21 | 1.588 4 (1.00) 62.8 | 0.224 8 (0.13) 57.4 | 0.009 7 (0.006) 64.2 | 0.008 0 (0.008) 96.2 | 0.627 3 (0.44) 70.3 | 3.432 4 (2.81) 81.9 | 0.644 9 (0.51) 78.6 | 2.053 8 (1.76) 85.9 |
土壤水80 cm (SW80) Soil water of 80 cm in depth n=21 | 1.046 2 (1.23) 117.9 | 0.213 6 (0.13) 59.7 | 0.011 1 (0.008) 67.5 | 0.007 0 (0.008) 119.3 | 0.639 1 (0.38) 59.4 | 3.721 1 (2.89) 77.8 | 0.638 1 (0.52) 82.2 | 2.357 4 (2.36) 100.3 |
溪水 (R) Runoff n=43 | 1.172 0 (0.63) 54.0 | 0.072 3 (0.04) 56.3 | 0.004 3 (0.009) 210.3 | 0.006 2 (0.006) 112.3 | 0.629 6 (0.46) 73.0 | 0.570 8 (0.56) 97.5 | 0.435 0 (0.22) 51.1 | 0.567 3 (0.50) 88.0 |
表1 季风常绿阔叶林水相中几种沉积元素浓度分布 (mg·L-1)
Table 1 Mean concentrations of several sediment elements in different water phases of monsoon evergreen broad_leaved forest ecosystem (mg·L-1)
水相类型 Liquid phase (LP) | Al3+ | Mn2+ | Sr2+ | Pb2+ | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大气降水 (PR) Precipitation n=24 | 0.329 0 (0.78) 236.7 | 0.029 5 (0.05) 184.3 | 0.004 5 (0.005) 114.7 | 0.062 0 (0.068) 110.3 | 0.320 2 (0.31) 98.3 | 0.507 8 (0.68) 133.3 | 0.109 8 (0.13) 117.8 | 0.831 4 (0.82) 98.1 |
穿透水 (TF) Throughfall n=23 | 0.393 3 (0.40) 101.8 | 0.237 2 (0.21) 88.7 | 0.022 4 (0.036) 162.4 | 0.012 5 (0.010) 81.5 | 0.524 7 (0.34) 64.4 | 6.663 6 (4.01) 105.1 | 0.809 6 (0.83) 102.0 | 3.291 6 (3.39) 103.0 |
土壤水30 cm (SW30) Soil water of 30 cm in depth n=21 | 1.588 4 (1.00) 62.8 | 0.224 8 (0.13) 57.4 | 0.009 7 (0.006) 64.2 | 0.008 0 (0.008) 96.2 | 0.627 3 (0.44) 70.3 | 3.432 4 (2.81) 81.9 | 0.644 9 (0.51) 78.6 | 2.053 8 (1.76) 85.9 |
土壤水80 cm (SW80) Soil water of 80 cm in depth n=21 | 1.046 2 (1.23) 117.9 | 0.213 6 (0.13) 59.7 | 0.011 1 (0.008) 67.5 | 0.007 0 (0.008) 119.3 | 0.639 1 (0.38) 59.4 | 3.721 1 (2.89) 77.8 | 0.638 1 (0.52) 82.2 | 2.357 4 (2.36) 100.3 |
溪水 (R) Runoff n=43 | 1.172 0 (0.63) 54.0 | 0.072 3 (0.04) 56.3 | 0.004 3 (0.009) 210.3 | 0.006 2 (0.006) 112.3 | 0.629 6 (0.46) 73.0 | 0.570 8 (0.56) 97.5 | 0.435 0 (0.22) 51.1 | 0.567 3 (0.50) 88.0 |
PR_TF | PR_ SW30 | PR_ SW80 | PR_R | TF_ SW30 | TF_ SW80 | TF_R | SW30_ SW80 | SW30_R | SW80_R | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al3+ | 0.482* | |||||||||
Mn2+ | 0.65** | 0.504* | ||||||||
Sr2+ | 0.596* | |||||||||
Pb2+ | 0.982** | |||||||||
Na+ | 0.591* | 0.655** | 0.802** | |||||||
K+ | 0.791** | 0.923** | 0.499* | 0.930** | 0.627** | 0.503* | ||||
Mg2+ | 0.819** | 0.493* | 0.712** | 0.690** | 0.920** | 0.465* | 0.652** | |||
Ca2+ | 0.851** | 0.845** | 0.869** | 0.903** |
表2 沉积元素在不同水相间浓度间的相关系数
Table 2 Correlation coefficient between concentration of sediment element in different liquid phase
PR_TF | PR_ SW30 | PR_ SW80 | PR_R | TF_ SW30 | TF_ SW80 | TF_R | SW30_ SW80 | SW30_R | SW80_R | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al3+ | 0.482* | |||||||||
Mn2+ | 0.65** | 0.504* | ||||||||
Sr2+ | 0.596* | |||||||||
Pb2+ | 0.982** | |||||||||
Na+ | 0.591* | 0.655** | 0.802** | |||||||
K+ | 0.791** | 0.923** | 0.499* | 0.930** | 0.627** | 0.503* | ||||
Mg2+ | 0.819** | 0.493* | 0.712** | 0.690** | 0.920** | 0.465* | 0.652** | |||
Ca2+ | 0.851** | 0.845** | 0.869** | 0.903** |
水相类型 Liquid phase (LP) | Al3+ | Mn2+ | Sr2+ | Pb2+ | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大气降水 (PR) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=9 | 0.078 13 (1.201 3) | 0.070 2 (0.076 9) | 0.008 5 (0.006 9) | 0.103 9 (0.101 3) | 0.659 7 (0.233 5) | 0.877 4 (1.037 3) | 0.211 0 (0.176 8) | 1.289 8 (1.190 8) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=16 | 0.074 5 (0.094 2) | 0.006 6 (0.004 6) | 0.002 3 (0.001 7) | 0.038 4 (0.019 1) | 0.129 2 (0.146 6) | 0.299 9 (0.175 2) | 0.052 8 (0.021 4) | 0.573 5 (0.333 7) | |
干/湿 D/W | 10.49 | 10.62 | 3.73 | 2.7 | 5.11 | 2.93 | 4.00 | 2.25 | |
穿透水 (TF) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=10 | 0.643 2 (0.472 0) | 0.362 1 (0.235 5) | 0.041 7 (0.049 5) | 0.017 3 (0.010 5) | 0.804 4 (0.184 9) | 8.916 9 (9.490) | 1.105 6 (1.120 4) | 4.949 6 (4.478 4) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=13 | 0.201 1 (0.187 0) | 0.148 9 (0.141 9) | 0.007 5 (0.006 0) | 0.008 8 (0.008 5) | 0.309 5 (0.263 3) | 4.930 3 (3.857 3) | 0.581 9 (0.423 4) | 2.015 7 (1.407 8) | |
干/湿 D/W | 3.20 | 2.36 | 5.53 | 1.97 | 2.60 | 1.81 | 1.90 | 2.46 | |
土壤水30 cm (SW30) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=5 | 1.466 4 (1.102 2) | 0.230 4 (0.162 1) | 0.008 4 (0.007 6) | 0.009 0 (0.011 5) | 0.840 1 (0.549 2) | 5.509 4 (5.349 7) | 1.063 6 (0.934 4) | 3.483 8 (3.314 2) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=16 | 1.626 5 (0.997 7) | 0.223 1 (0.123 4) | 0.010 1 (0.006 0) | 0.007 7 (0.006 5) | 0.560 8 (0.398 8) | 2.783 4 (1.003 5) | 0.514 1 (0.180 7) | 1.606 9 (0.568 3) | |
干/湿 D/W | 0.90 | 1.03 | 0.83 | 1.17 | 1.50 | 1.98 | 2.07 | 2.17 | |
土壤水80 cm (SW80) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=5 | 1.001 4 (0.749 6) | 0.249 6 (0.163 8) | 0.018 5 (0.010 6) | 0.006 5 (0.007 0) | 0.780 4 (0.477 6) | 6.091 3 (5.303 0) | 1.046 1 (0.960 9) | 4.267 8 (4.378 9) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=16 | 1.060 2 (1.370 1) | 0.202 4 (0.118 3) | 0.008 7 (0.004 5) | 0.004 2 (0.005 3) | 0.594 9 (0.350 3) | 2.980 4 (1.099 5) | 0.510 6 (0.218 4) | 1.760 3 (0.863 2) | |
干/湿 D/W | 0.94 | 1.23 | 2.12 | 1.55 | 1.31 | 2.04 | 2.05 | 2.42 | |
溪水 (R) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=24 | 1.006 6 (0.462 6) | 0.075 3 (0.048 0) | 0.002 2 (0.003 9) | 0.007 8 (0.005 1) | 0.383 3 (0.348 8) | 0.572 6 (0.688 7) | 0.379 6 (0.249 2) | 0.358 3 (0.423 9) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=19 | 1.381 0 (0.761 1) | 0.068 6 (0.030 0) | 0.007 0 (0.012 6) | 0.006 0 (0.010 4) | 0.940 5 (0.393 5) | 0.568 6 (0.340 9) | 0.505 1 (0.163 0) | 0.831 3 (0.468 5) | |
干/湿 D/W | 0.73 | 1.10 | 0.32 | 1.29 | 0.41 | 1.01 | 0.75 | 0.43 |
表3 干湿季水相中元素平均浓度 (mg·L-1) 及比值
Table 3 Mean concentrations (mg·L-1) in dry and wet season and their ratio in different water phases of monsoon evergreen broad_leaved forest ecosystem
水相类型 Liquid phase (LP) | Al3+ | Mn2+ | Sr2+ | Pb2+ | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大气降水 (PR) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=9 | 0.078 13 (1.201 3) | 0.070 2 (0.076 9) | 0.008 5 (0.006 9) | 0.103 9 (0.101 3) | 0.659 7 (0.233 5) | 0.877 4 (1.037 3) | 0.211 0 (0.176 8) | 1.289 8 (1.190 8) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=16 | 0.074 5 (0.094 2) | 0.006 6 (0.004 6) | 0.002 3 (0.001 7) | 0.038 4 (0.019 1) | 0.129 2 (0.146 6) | 0.299 9 (0.175 2) | 0.052 8 (0.021 4) | 0.573 5 (0.333 7) | |
干/湿 D/W | 10.49 | 10.62 | 3.73 | 2.7 | 5.11 | 2.93 | 4.00 | 2.25 | |
穿透水 (TF) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=10 | 0.643 2 (0.472 0) | 0.362 1 (0.235 5) | 0.041 7 (0.049 5) | 0.017 3 (0.010 5) | 0.804 4 (0.184 9) | 8.916 9 (9.490) | 1.105 6 (1.120 4) | 4.949 6 (4.478 4) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=13 | 0.201 1 (0.187 0) | 0.148 9 (0.141 9) | 0.007 5 (0.006 0) | 0.008 8 (0.008 5) | 0.309 5 (0.263 3) | 4.930 3 (3.857 3) | 0.581 9 (0.423 4) | 2.015 7 (1.407 8) | |
干/湿 D/W | 3.20 | 2.36 | 5.53 | 1.97 | 2.60 | 1.81 | 1.90 | 2.46 | |
土壤水30 cm (SW30) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=5 | 1.466 4 (1.102 2) | 0.230 4 (0.162 1) | 0.008 4 (0.007 6) | 0.009 0 (0.011 5) | 0.840 1 (0.549 2) | 5.509 4 (5.349 7) | 1.063 6 (0.934 4) | 3.483 8 (3.314 2) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=16 | 1.626 5 (0.997 7) | 0.223 1 (0.123 4) | 0.010 1 (0.006 0) | 0.007 7 (0.006 5) | 0.560 8 (0.398 8) | 2.783 4 (1.003 5) | 0.514 1 (0.180 7) | 1.606 9 (0.568 3) | |
干/湿 D/W | 0.90 | 1.03 | 0.83 | 1.17 | 1.50 | 1.98 | 2.07 | 2.17 | |
土壤水80 cm (SW80) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=5 | 1.001 4 (0.749 6) | 0.249 6 (0.163 8) | 0.018 5 (0.010 6) | 0.006 5 (0.007 0) | 0.780 4 (0.477 6) | 6.091 3 (5.303 0) | 1.046 1 (0.960 9) | 4.267 8 (4.378 9) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=16 | 1.060 2 (1.370 1) | 0.202 4 (0.118 3) | 0.008 7 (0.004 5) | 0.004 2 (0.005 3) | 0.594 9 (0.350 3) | 2.980 4 (1.099 5) | 0.510 6 (0.218 4) | 1.760 3 (0.863 2) | |
干/湿 D/W | 0.94 | 1.23 | 2.12 | 1.55 | 1.31 | 2.04 | 2.05 | 2.42 | |
溪水 (R) | 干季 (D) Dry season n=24 | 1.006 6 (0.462 6) | 0.075 3 (0.048 0) | 0.002 2 (0.003 9) | 0.007 8 (0.005 1) | 0.383 3 (0.348 8) | 0.572 6 (0.688 7) | 0.379 6 (0.249 2) | 0.358 3 (0.423 9) |
湿季 (W) Wet season n=19 | 1.381 0 (0.761 1) | 0.068 6 (0.030 0) | 0.007 0 (0.012 6) | 0.006 0 (0.010 4) | 0.940 5 (0.393 5) | 0.568 6 (0.340 9) | 0.505 1 (0.163 0) | 0.831 3 (0.468 5) | |
干/湿 D/W | 0.73 | 1.10 | 0.32 | 1.29 | 0.41 | 1.01 | 0.75 | 0.43 |
水相 (LP) | Mn2+ | Sr2+ | Pb2+ | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大气降水 (PR) | Al3+ | 0.909** | 0.802** | 0.689** | 0.768** | |||
Mn2+ | 0.873** | 0.621** | 0.746** | |||||
Sr2+ | 0.551** | 0.469* | 0.648** | |||||
Pb2+ | 0.574** | |||||||
Na+ | ||||||||
K+ | 0.534** | 0.872** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.682** | |||||||
穿透水 (TF) | Al3+ | 0.827** | 0.692** | 0.542** | 0.481* | 0.616** | 0.508* | |
Mn2+ | 0.823** | 0.483* | 0.581** | 0.776** | 0.768** | 0.761** | ||
Sr2+ | 0.477* | 0.691** | 0.913** | 0.691** | ||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.504* | 0.514* | 0.483* | |||||
K+ | 0.706** | 0.835** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.693** | |||||||
土壤水30 cm (SW30) | Al3+ | 0.689** | 0.511* | |||||
Mn2+ | 0.578** | 0.470* | ||||||
Sr2+ | ||||||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.645** | 0.718** | 0.655** | |||||
K+ | 0.944** | 0.876** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.928** | |||||||
土壤水80 cm (SW80) | Al3+ | 0.738** | 0.451* | 0.745** | ||||
Mn2+ | 0.734** | 0.601** | 0.540* | |||||
Sr2+ | 0.444* | 0.643** | 0.701** | |||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.501* | 0.646** | 0.581** | |||||
K+ | 0.834** | 0.884** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.924** | |||||||
溪水 (R) | Al3+ | 0.381** | 0.293* | |||||
Mn2+ | 0.253* | |||||||
Sr2+ | 0.365* | |||||||
Pb2+ | 0.371** | |||||||
Na+ | 0.964** | 0.977** | ||||||
K+ | 0.990** | |||||||
Mg2+ | ||||||||
所有水样All samples | Al3+ | 0.461** | 0.177* | 0.242** | ||||
Mn2+ | 0.683** | 0.279** | 0.189* | 0.700** | ||||
Sr2+ | 0.215* | 0.643** | ||||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.905** | 0.953** | ||||||
K+ | 0.960** | 0.283** | ||||||
Mg2+ |
表4 各水相中沉积元素浓度间的相关系数
Table 4 Correlation coefficient matrix of sediment elements in liquid phases
水相 (LP) | Mn2+ | Sr2+ | Pb2+ | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大气降水 (PR) | Al3+ | 0.909** | 0.802** | 0.689** | 0.768** | |||
Mn2+ | 0.873** | 0.621** | 0.746** | |||||
Sr2+ | 0.551** | 0.469* | 0.648** | |||||
Pb2+ | 0.574** | |||||||
Na+ | ||||||||
K+ | 0.534** | 0.872** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.682** | |||||||
穿透水 (TF) | Al3+ | 0.827** | 0.692** | 0.542** | 0.481* | 0.616** | 0.508* | |
Mn2+ | 0.823** | 0.483* | 0.581** | 0.776** | 0.768** | 0.761** | ||
Sr2+ | 0.477* | 0.691** | 0.913** | 0.691** | ||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.504* | 0.514* | 0.483* | |||||
K+ | 0.706** | 0.835** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.693** | |||||||
土壤水30 cm (SW30) | Al3+ | 0.689** | 0.511* | |||||
Mn2+ | 0.578** | 0.470* | ||||||
Sr2+ | ||||||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.645** | 0.718** | 0.655** | |||||
K+ | 0.944** | 0.876** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.928** | |||||||
土壤水80 cm (SW80) | Al3+ | 0.738** | 0.451* | 0.745** | ||||
Mn2+ | 0.734** | 0.601** | 0.540* | |||||
Sr2+ | 0.444* | 0.643** | 0.701** | |||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.501* | 0.646** | 0.581** | |||||
K+ | 0.834** | 0.884** | ||||||
Mg2+ | 0.924** | |||||||
溪水 (R) | Al3+ | 0.381** | 0.293* | |||||
Mn2+ | 0.253* | |||||||
Sr2+ | 0.365* | |||||||
Pb2+ | 0.371** | |||||||
Na+ | 0.964** | 0.977** | ||||||
K+ | 0.990** | |||||||
Mg2+ | ||||||||
所有水样All samples | Al3+ | 0.461** | 0.177* | 0.242** | ||||
Mn2+ | 0.683** | 0.279** | 0.189* | 0.700** | ||||
Sr2+ | 0.215* | 0.643** | ||||||
Pb2+ | ||||||||
Na+ | 0.905** | 0.953** | ||||||
K+ | 0.960** | 0.283** | ||||||
Mg2+ |
[1] |
Bailey SW, Hornbeck JW, Driscoll CT, Gaudette HE (1996). Calcium inputs and transport in a base_poor forest ecosystem as interpreted by Sr isotopes. Water Resource Research, 32,707-719.
DOI URL |
[2] |
Balestrini R, Galli L, Tartari G (2000). Wet and dry atmospheric at prealpine and alpine sites in northern Italy. Atmospheric Environment, 34,1455-1470.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Bravo HA, Saavedra MIR, Sánchez RJ, Torres RJ, Granada LMM (2000). Chemical composition of precipitation in a Mexican Maya region. Atmospheric Environment, 34,1197-1204.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Clow DW, Mast MA, Blutten TD, Turk JT (1997). Strontium-87/strontium-86 as a tracer of mineral weathering reactions and calcium sources in an alpine/subalpine watershed, Loch Vale, Colorado. Water Resources Research, 33,1335-1351.
DOI URL |
[5] |
Driscoll CT, van Breeman N, Mulder J (1985). Aluminum chemistry in a forested spodosol. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49,437-444.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Feller MC, Kimmins JP (1979). Chemical characteristics of small streams near Haney in southwestern British Columbia. Water Resources Research, 15,247-258.
DOI URL |
[7] | He JH (何金海), Chen ZQ (陈兆其), Liang YE (梁永) (1982). The soils of Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve. Tropical and Subtropical Forest Ecosystem (热带亚热带森林生态系统研究), 1,25-37. (in Chinese) |
[8] |
Herut B, Starinsky A, Katz A (1993). Strontium in rainwater from Israel: sources, isotopes and chemistry. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 120,77-84.
DOI URL |
[9] | Huang ZF (黄展帆), Fan ZG (范征广) (1982). The climate of Dinghushan. Tropical and Subtropical Forest Ecosystem (热带亚热带森林生态系统研究), 1,11-16. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Huang ZL (黄忠良), Kong GH (孔国辉), Yu QF (余清发), Zhang ZH (张志红) (2000). Hydrological function and nutrient dynamics in lower subtropical monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 24,157-161. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Huang ZL (黄忠良), Ding MM (丁明懋), Zhang ZP (张祝平), Yi WM (蚁伟民) (1994). The hydrological processes and nitrogen dynamics in a monsoon evergreen broad-leafed forest of Dinghushan. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 18,194-199. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] |
Jacks G, [math16z]berg G, Hamilton J (1989). Calcium budgets for catchments as interpreted by strontium isotopes. Nordic Hydrology, 20,85-96.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Land M, Ingri J, Andersson PS, hlander B (2000). Ba/Sr, Ca/Sr and 87Sr/86Sr ratios in soil water and groundwater: implication for relative contributions to stream water discharge. Applied Geochemistry, 15,311-325.
DOI URL |
[14] |
Landon MK, Delin GN, Komor SC, Regan CP (1999). Comparison of the stable_isotopic composition of soil water collected from suction lysimeters, wick samples, and cores in a sandy unsaturated zone. Journal of Hydrology, 224,45-54.
DOI URL |
[15] | Liu JX (刘菊秀), Zhang DQ (张德强), Zhou GY (周国逸), Wen DZ (温达志), Zhang QM (张倩媚) (2003). A preliminary study on the chemical properties of precipitation, throughfall, streamflow and surface run-off in major forest types at Dinghushan under acid deposition. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 14,1223-1228. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Miao KY (缪坤裕), Chen GZ (陈桂珠) (1998). Allocation and migration of lead in simulated wetland system of kandelia candel. China Environmental Science (中国环境科学), 18,48-51. (in Chinese) |
[17] | Ouyang XJ (欧阳学军), Zhou GY (周国逸), Huang ZL (黄忠良), Huang MH (黄梦虹) (2002). Analysis on runoff water quality in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22,1373-1379. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Peng SL (彭少麟) (1996). Community Dynamics of Subtropical Forest (亚热带森林群落动态学). Science Press, Beijing,57-71. (in Chinese) |
[19] |
Probst A, Gh'mari AE, Aubert D, Fritz B, McNutt R (2000). Strontium as a tracer of weathering processes in a silicate catchment polluted by acid atmospheric inputs, Strengbach, France. Chemical Geology, 170,203-219.
DOI URL |
[20] |
Semhi K, Clauer N, Probest JL (2000). Strontium isotope compositions of river waters as records of lithology_dependent mass transfers: the Garonne river and its tributaries (SW France). Chemical Geology, 168,173-193.
DOI URL |
[21] |
van Praag HJ, de Smedt F, vu Thanh T (2000). Simulation of calcium leaching and desorption in an acid forest soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 51,245-255.
DOI URL |
[22] | Wang BX (王伯荪), Ma MJ (马曼杰) (1982). The successions of the forest community in Dinghushan. Tropical and Subtropical Forest Ecosystem (热带亚热带森林生态系统研究), 1,142-156. (in Chinese) |
[23] | Wang WJ (王维君), Chen JF (陈家坊), He Q (何群) (1992). Effects of simulated acid rain on release and forms of aluminum from main acidic soils. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 3,184-189. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Wang ZH (王铸豪), He DQ (何道泉), Song SD (宋绍敦), Chen SP (陈树培), Chen DR (陈定如), Tu MZ (屠梦照) (1982). The vegetation of Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve. Tropical and Subtropical Forest Ecosystem (热带亚热带森林生态系统研究), 1,77-141. (in Chinese) |
[25] | Wen DZ (温达志), Wei P (魏平), Zhang QM (张倩媚), Kong GH (孔国辉) (1999). Studies on biomass of three low subtropical evergreen broad_leaved forests in a MAB reserve of South China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23 (Suppl.),11-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Xue JL (薛皎亮), Liu HX (刘红霞), Xie YP (谢映平) (2000). Lead in city air accumulated by the green tree, Sophora japonica. China Environmental Science (中国环境科学), 20,536-539. (in Chinese) |
[27] | Zhou GY (周国逸), Yan JH (闫俊华) (2001). The influences of regional atmospheric precipitation characteristics and its element inputs on the existence and development of Dinghushan forest ecosystems. Acta Ecological Sinica (生态学报), 21,2002-2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Zhou GY (周国逸), Norio Ogura (小仓纪雄) (1996). The influences of acid rain of the liberation of several elements from various soil types in Chongqing. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 16,251-257. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 李安艳, 黄先飞, 田源斌, 董继兴, 郑菲菲, 夏品华. 贵州草海草-藻型稳态转换过程中叶绿素a的变化及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1171-1181. |
[2] | 王晶苑, 魏杰, 温学发. 土壤CO2通量梯度观测技术和方法的理论、假设与应用进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1523-1536. |
[3] | 郑周涛, 张扬建. 1982-2018年青藏高原水分利用效率变化及归因分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1486-1496. |
[4] | 李捷, 陈莹莹, 乔福云, 郅堤港, 郭正刚. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草甸β多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 476-486. |
[5] | 叶子飘, 于冯, 安婷, 王复标, 康华靖. 植物气孔导度对CO2响应模型的构建[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 420-428. |
[6] | 冯兆忠, 袁相洋, 李品, 尚博, 平琴, 胡廷剑, 刘硕. 地表臭氧浓度升高对陆地生态系统影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 526-542. |
[7] | 牛书丽, 陈卫楠. 全球变化与生态系统研究现状与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 449-460. |
[8] | 冯兆忠, 李品, 张国友, 李征珍, 平琴, 彭金龙, 刘硕. 二氧化碳浓度升高对陆地生态系统的影响: 问题与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 461-474. |
[9] | 冯兆忠, 徐彦森, 尚博. FACE实验技术和方法回顾及其在全球变化研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(4): 340-349. |
[10] | 王雪梅, 闫帮国, 史亮涛, 刘刚才. 车桑子幼苗生物量分配与叶性状对氮磷浓度的响应差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1247-1261. |
[11] | 赵鑫, 王文娟, 王普昶, 黄莉娟, 赵丽丽. 不同钙浓度对宽叶雀稗幼苗的生长和抗性生理的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(10): 909-920. |
[12] | 梁士楚, 刘润红, 荣春艳, 常斌, 姜勇. 漓江河岸带植物功能性状变异与关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 16-26. |
[13] | 王丽华, 薛晶月, 谢雨, 吴彦. 不同气候类型下四川草地土壤有机碳空间分布及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 297-306. |
[14] | 庞家平, 温学发. 稳定同位素红外光谱技术测定CO2同位素校正方法的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 143-152. |
[15] | 张慧萍, 王淑月, 欧忠辉. 根表面养分吸收通量和根围溶质浓度的近似解析解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 1043-1049. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19