植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 165-173.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0023
所属专题: 生物多样性
收稿日期:
2004-11-29
接受日期:
2005-06-25
出版日期:
2006-11-29
发布日期:
2006-01-30
通讯作者:
顾万春
作者简介:
*E-mail:guwe@forestry.ac.cn基金资助:
LUO Jian-Xun1, GU Wan-Chun2,*(), CHEN Shao-Yu3
Received:
2004-11-29
Accepted:
2005-06-25
Online:
2006-11-29
Published:
2006-01-30
Contact:
GU Wan-Chun
摘要:
采用等位酶淀粉凝胶电泳和聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳技术对中国西部亚高山特有树种云杉(Picea asperata)10个天然群体的300个个体的遗传多样性和遗传分化进行研究。对8个酶系统17个酶位点(27个等位基因)的检测分析结果表明,10个位点为单态位点,云杉具有中等偏低的遗传变异水平。群体水平上的遗传多样性指标分别为:多态位点的百分率PP=29.41%~41.18%,等位基因平均数AP=1.4~1.6,平均期望杂合度Hep=0.06~0.131;种级水平的遗传多样性指标分别为:Ps=41.18%,As=1.2,Hes=0.138。10个群体的群体水平的观测杂合度为0.094 3,期望杂合度为0.096 4;10个群体中,7个多态位点的单位点的观测杂合度(Ho)的均值为0.229(变幅为0.142 9~0.342 9),期望杂合度(He)的均值为0.234 1(变幅为0.160 8~0.317 3), 云杉天然群体间遗传分化度(FST)为0.311,云杉群体间变异占总变异的31.1%,基因流低(Nm=0.553 9),说明群体间的基因交流有限。异交率高(t=0.957),近交率低(Fis=0.005),这些研究结果表明:云杉群体间等位基因的频率分化显著,其它云杉属树种基因的渐渗、群体微生境差异和不同强度的选择压力可能是造成群体间分化显著的主要原因;Fdh-2-B基因与综合生态梯度值呈显著的负相关(r=-0.661 1*),He与经度呈显著负相关(r=-0.683*),云杉群体间的地理和遗传距离相关不显著。10个群体均含有绝大部分等位基因,且群体间分化很大,应加以重点保护和管理,作为云杉种质资源原地保存的基地和该树种进一步遗传改良的重要育种群体。
罗建勋, 顾万春, 陈少瑜. 云杉天然群体遗传多样性的等位酶变异. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 165-173. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0023
LUO Jian-Xun, GU Wan-Chun, CHEN Shao-Yu. ALLOZYME VARIATION IN 10 NATURAL POPULATIONS OF PICEA ASPERATA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(1): 165-173. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0023
酶系统 Enzyme system | EC代号 EC No. | 缓冲液系统 Buffer system | 位点数 No. of loci | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
天冬氨酸转氨酶Aspartate aminotransferase (ATT) | E.C.2.6.1.1 | S6 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
谷氨酸脱氢酶Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) | E.C.1.4.1.2 | S1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
甲酸脱氢酶Formate dehydrogenase (FDH) | E.C.1.2.1.2 | S6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
异柠檬酸脱氢酶Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) | E.C.1.1.1.42 | W2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
苹果酸脱氢酶Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) | E.C.1.1.1.37 | W2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
磷酸葡萄糖酸脱氢酶Malate dehydrogenase (PGD) | E.C.1.1.1.44 | W2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
乙醇脱氢酶Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) | E.C.1.1.1.1 | S1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
莽草酸脱氢酶Shikimate dehydrogenase (SKD) | E.C.1.1.1.25 | W2 | 1 |
表1 8种酶系统和缓冲液系统以及每个酶系统检测到位点数
Table 1 8 enzyme systems assayed and relevant buffers,and loci detected in Picea asperata
酶系统 Enzyme system | EC代号 EC No. | 缓冲液系统 Buffer system | 位点数 No. of loci | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
天冬氨酸转氨酶Aspartate aminotransferase (ATT) | E.C.2.6.1.1 | S6 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
谷氨酸脱氢酶Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) | E.C.1.4.1.2 | S1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
甲酸脱氢酶Formate dehydrogenase (FDH) | E.C.1.2.1.2 | S6 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
异柠檬酸脱氢酶Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) | E.C.1.1.1.42 | W2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
苹果酸脱氢酶Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) | E.C.1.1.1.37 | W2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
磷酸葡萄糖酸脱氢酶Malate dehydrogenase (PGD) | E.C.1.1.1.44 | W2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
乙醇脱氢酶Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) | E.C.1.1.1.1 | S1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
莽草酸脱氢酶Shikimate dehydrogenase (SKD) | E.C.1.1.1.25 | W2 | 1 |
位点 Locus | 等位基因 Allele | 群体Population | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小金 Xiaojin | 川盘 Chuanpan | 铁布 Tiebu | 阿坝 Aba | 黑水 Heishui | 卓尼 Zhuoni | 林坡 Linpo | 大录 Dalu | 巴西 Baxi | 热务沟 Rewugou | 平均 Mean | ||
Aat-1 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Aat-2 | A | 0.050 | 0.017 | 0.117 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.267 | 0.083 | 0.100 | 0.067 | 0.000 | 0.070 |
B | 0.950 | 0.967 | 0.833 | 0.933 | 0.917 | 0.667 | 0.917 | 0.817 | 0.917 | 0.883 | 0.875 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.050 | 0.067 | 0.083 | 0.066 | 0.000 | 0.083 | 0.017 | 0.117 | 0.050 | |
Aat-3 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Aat-4 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Adh | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Fdh-1 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Fdh-2 | A | 0.183 | 0.517 | 0.233 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.167 | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.467 | 0.017 | 0.217 |
B | 0.700 | 0.417 | 0.717 | 0.600 | 1.000 | 0.733 | 0.683 | 0.700 | 0.450 | 0.917 | 0.692 | |
C | 0.117 | 0.067 | 0.050 | 0.367 | 0.000 | 0.100 | 0.067 | 0.000 | 0.083 | 0.067 | 0.092 | |
Gdh | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Idh-1 | A | 1.000 | 0.833 | 0.900 | 0.700 | 0.900 | 0.083 | 1.000 | 0.983 | 0.933 | 0.600 | 0.793 |
B | 0.000 | 0.167 | 0.100 | 0.300 | 0.100 | 0.917 | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.067 | 0.400 | 0.207 | |
Idh-2 | A | 0.000 | 0.150 | 0.067 | 0.017 | 0.083 | 0.833 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.123 |
B | 1.000 | 0.850 | 0.917 | 0.983 | 0.917 | 0.167 | 1.000 | 0.967 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 0.875 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
Mdh-1 | A | 0.383 | 0.800 | 0.950 | 0.900 | 0.883 | 0.150 | 0.950 | 0.883 | 0.917 | 0.917 | 0.763 |
B | 0.617 | 0.200 | 0.050 | 0.100 | 0.117 | 0.850 | 0.050 | 0.012 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0.227 | |
Mdh-2 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Mdh-3 | A | 0.250 | 0.133 | 0.217 | 0.000 | 0.200 | 0.833 | 0.283 | 0.183 | 0.017 | 0.250 | 0.230 |
B | 0.750 | 0.867 | 0.783 | 1.000 | 0.800 | 0.167 | 0.717 | 0.817 | 0.983 | 0.750 | 0.763 | |
Pgd-1 | A | 0.067 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 0.933 | 0.950 | 0.933 | 0.550 | 0.667 | 0.900 | 0.950 | 0.735 |
B | 0.933 | 0.400 | 0.200 | 0.067 | 0.050 | 0.067 | 0.450 | 0.333 | 0.100 | 0.050 | 0.265 | |
Pgd-2 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Pgd-3 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Skd | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
基因频率平均值 Mean value of gene frequency | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | |
等位基因数 Number of alleles | 23.000 | 26.000 | 27.000 | 24.000 | 23.000 | 26.000 | 23.000 | 25.000 | 26.000 | 24.000 | 24.700 |
表2 云杉群体的等位基因频率分布
Table 2 Distribution of allele frequencies at 17 isozyme gene loci in ten populations of Picea asperata
位点 Locus | 等位基因 Allele | 群体Population | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小金 Xiaojin | 川盘 Chuanpan | 铁布 Tiebu | 阿坝 Aba | 黑水 Heishui | 卓尼 Zhuoni | 林坡 Linpo | 大录 Dalu | 巴西 Baxi | 热务沟 Rewugou | 平均 Mean | ||
Aat-1 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Aat-2 | A | 0.050 | 0.017 | 0.117 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.267 | 0.083 | 0.100 | 0.067 | 0.000 | 0.070 |
B | 0.950 | 0.967 | 0.833 | 0.933 | 0.917 | 0.667 | 0.917 | 0.817 | 0.917 | 0.883 | 0.875 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.050 | 0.067 | 0.083 | 0.066 | 0.000 | 0.083 | 0.017 | 0.117 | 0.050 | |
Aat-3 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Aat-4 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Adh | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Fdh-1 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Fdh-2 | A | 0.183 | 0.517 | 0.233 | 0.033 | 0.000 | 0.167 | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.467 | 0.017 | 0.217 |
B | 0.700 | 0.417 | 0.717 | 0.600 | 1.000 | 0.733 | 0.683 | 0.700 | 0.450 | 0.917 | 0.692 | |
C | 0.117 | 0.067 | 0.050 | 0.367 | 0.000 | 0.100 | 0.067 | 0.000 | 0.083 | 0.067 | 0.092 | |
Gdh | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Idh-1 | A | 1.000 | 0.833 | 0.900 | 0.700 | 0.900 | 0.083 | 1.000 | 0.983 | 0.933 | 0.600 | 0.793 |
B | 0.000 | 0.167 | 0.100 | 0.300 | 0.100 | 0.917 | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.067 | 0.400 | 0.207 | |
Idh-2 | A | 0.000 | 0.150 | 0.067 | 0.017 | 0.083 | 0.833 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.123 |
B | 1.000 | 0.850 | 0.917 | 0.983 | 0.917 | 0.167 | 1.000 | 0.967 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 0.875 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
Mdh-1 | A | 0.383 | 0.800 | 0.950 | 0.900 | 0.883 | 0.150 | 0.950 | 0.883 | 0.917 | 0.917 | 0.763 |
B | 0.617 | 0.200 | 0.050 | 0.100 | 0.117 | 0.850 | 0.050 | 0.012 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0.227 | |
Mdh-2 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Mdh-3 | A | 0.250 | 0.133 | 0.217 | 0.000 | 0.200 | 0.833 | 0.283 | 0.183 | 0.017 | 0.250 | 0.230 |
B | 0.750 | 0.867 | 0.783 | 1.000 | 0.800 | 0.167 | 0.717 | 0.817 | 0.983 | 0.750 | 0.763 | |
Pgd-1 | A | 0.067 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 0.933 | 0.950 | 0.933 | 0.550 | 0.667 | 0.900 | 0.950 | 0.735 |
B | 0.933 | 0.400 | 0.200 | 0.067 | 0.050 | 0.067 | 0.450 | 0.333 | 0.100 | 0.050 | 0.265 | |
Pgd-2 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Pgd-3 | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Skd | A | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
基因频率平均值 Mean value of gene frequency | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | 0.630 | |
等位基因数 Number of alleles | 23.000 | 26.000 | 27.000 | 24.000 | 23.000 | 26.000 | 23.000 | 25.000 | 26.000 | 24.000 | 24.700 |
群体 Population | 个体 Individual | 等位基因数 A | 有效等位基因 数目Ae | 多态位点 百分率P | 异交率 Outbreeding coefficient | Shanonon 信息指数I | 观测杂合度 HO | 期望杂合度 He |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小金Xiaojin | 30 | 1.352 9(0.606 3) | 1.153 3(0.310 3) | 29.41 | 0.628 114 | 0.146 0(0.268 6) | 0.070 6(0.173 4) | 0.091 5(0.173 4) |
川盘Chuanpan | 30 | 1.529 4(0.717 4) | 1.219 9(0.368 1) | 41.18 | 1.000 000 | 0.205 6(0.288 9) | 0.141 2(0.200 9) | 0.130 6(0.190 3) |
铁布Tiebu | 30 | 1.588 2(0.795 2) | 1.156 0(0.236 8) | 41.18 | 1.000 000 | 0.185 6(0.253 2) | 0.113 7(0.166 3) | 0.108 2(0.152 3) |
阿坝Aba | 30 | 1.411 8(0.618 3) | 1.134 1(0.289 9) | 35.29 | 1.000 000 | 0.135 2(0.239 2) | 0.094 1(0.192 7) | 0.082 9(0.157 2) |
黑水Heishui | 30 | 1.352 9(0.492 6) | 1.083 3(0.135 8) | 35.29 | 1.000 000 | 0.115 2(0.170 4) | 0.070 6(0.116 6) | 0.066 2(0.102 0) |
卓尼Zhuoni | 30 | 1.529 4(0.717 4) | 1.174 7(0.280 9) | 41.18 | 1.000 000 | 0.195 6(0.276 2) | 0.117 6(0.170 8) | 0.114 9(0.162 4) |
林坡Linpo | 30 | 1.352 9(0.606 3) | 1.166 0(0.332 2) | 29.41 | 0.949 546 | 0.150 4(0.272 2) | 0.094 1(0.187 9) | 0.096 6(0.180 9) |
大录Dalu | 30 | 1.470 6(0.624 3) | 1.163 3(0.271 6) | 41.18 | 0.536 357 | 0.171 6(0.253 2) | 0.074 5(0.128 8) | 0.106 7(0.165 6) |
巴西Baxi | 30 | 1.529 4(0.717 4) | 1.129 7(0.321 9) | 41.18 | 0.598 778 | 0.140 6(0.239 3) | 0.058 8(0.093 9) | 0.078 5(0.146 5) |
热务沟Rewugou | 30 | 1.411 8(0.618 3) | 1.132 4(0.257 2) | 35.29 | 1.000 000 | 0.141 7(0.221 8) | 0.107 8(0.215 2) | 0.087 6(0.149 1) |
种级水平 At species level | 300 | 1.588 2(0.795 2) | 1.216 3(0.295 3) | 41.18 | / | 0.224 4(0.288 1) | 0.094 3(0.127 1) | 0.137 8(0.178 5) |
群体平均水平 At population level | 30 | 1.452 9 | 1.151 3 | 37.06 | 0.957 4 | 0.158 8 | 0.094 3 | 0.096 4 |
表3 云杉10个群体的17个等位基因位点的遗传变异
Table 3 Genetic diversity of 17 allele loci of 10 populations in Picea asperata
群体 Population | 个体 Individual | 等位基因数 A | 有效等位基因 数目Ae | 多态位点 百分率P | 异交率 Outbreeding coefficient | Shanonon 信息指数I | 观测杂合度 HO | 期望杂合度 He |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小金Xiaojin | 30 | 1.352 9(0.606 3) | 1.153 3(0.310 3) | 29.41 | 0.628 114 | 0.146 0(0.268 6) | 0.070 6(0.173 4) | 0.091 5(0.173 4) |
川盘Chuanpan | 30 | 1.529 4(0.717 4) | 1.219 9(0.368 1) | 41.18 | 1.000 000 | 0.205 6(0.288 9) | 0.141 2(0.200 9) | 0.130 6(0.190 3) |
铁布Tiebu | 30 | 1.588 2(0.795 2) | 1.156 0(0.236 8) | 41.18 | 1.000 000 | 0.185 6(0.253 2) | 0.113 7(0.166 3) | 0.108 2(0.152 3) |
阿坝Aba | 30 | 1.411 8(0.618 3) | 1.134 1(0.289 9) | 35.29 | 1.000 000 | 0.135 2(0.239 2) | 0.094 1(0.192 7) | 0.082 9(0.157 2) |
黑水Heishui | 30 | 1.352 9(0.492 6) | 1.083 3(0.135 8) | 35.29 | 1.000 000 | 0.115 2(0.170 4) | 0.070 6(0.116 6) | 0.066 2(0.102 0) |
卓尼Zhuoni | 30 | 1.529 4(0.717 4) | 1.174 7(0.280 9) | 41.18 | 1.000 000 | 0.195 6(0.276 2) | 0.117 6(0.170 8) | 0.114 9(0.162 4) |
林坡Linpo | 30 | 1.352 9(0.606 3) | 1.166 0(0.332 2) | 29.41 | 0.949 546 | 0.150 4(0.272 2) | 0.094 1(0.187 9) | 0.096 6(0.180 9) |
大录Dalu | 30 | 1.470 6(0.624 3) | 1.163 3(0.271 6) | 41.18 | 0.536 357 | 0.171 6(0.253 2) | 0.074 5(0.128 8) | 0.106 7(0.165 6) |
巴西Baxi | 30 | 1.529 4(0.717 4) | 1.129 7(0.321 9) | 41.18 | 0.598 778 | 0.140 6(0.239 3) | 0.058 8(0.093 9) | 0.078 5(0.146 5) |
热务沟Rewugou | 30 | 1.411 8(0.618 3) | 1.132 4(0.257 2) | 35.29 | 1.000 000 | 0.141 7(0.221 8) | 0.107 8(0.215 2) | 0.087 6(0.149 1) |
种级水平 At species level | 300 | 1.588 2(0.795 2) | 1.216 3(0.295 3) | 41.18 | / | 0.224 4(0.288 1) | 0.094 3(0.127 1) | 0.137 8(0.178 5) |
群体平均水平 At population level | 30 | 1.452 9 | 1.151 3 | 37.06 | 0.957 4 | 0.158 8 | 0.094 3 | 0.096 4 |
位点 Locus | 杂合度 Heterozy gosity | 小金 Xiaojin | 川盘 Chuanpan | 铁布 Tiebu | 阿坝 Aba | 黑水 Heishui | 卓尼 Zhuoni | 林坡 Linpo | 大录 Dalu | 巴西 Baxi | 热务沟 Rewugou | 平均值 Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | Ho | 0.100 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.266 7 | 0.133 3 | 0.100 0 | 0.533 3 | 0.100 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.233 3 | 0.193 3 |
He | 0.096 6 | 0.066 1 | 0.294 4 | 0.126 6 | 0.155 4 | 0.488 1 | 0.155 4 | 0.321 5 | 0.157 6 | 0.209 6 | 0.207 1 | |
Fdh-2 | Ho | 0.566 7 | 0.433 3 | 0.433 3 | 0.566 7 | 0.000 0 | 0.366 7 | 0.533 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.373 3 |
He | 0.470 6 | 0.564 4 | 0.436 7 | 0.513 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.431 6 | 0.474 0 | 0.427 1 | 0.582 5 | 0.157 6 | 0.405 8 | |
Idh-1 | Ho | 0.000 0 | 0.333 3 | 0.133 3 | 0.600 0 | 0.200 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.033 3 | 0.133 3 | 0.800 0 | 0.233 3 |
He | 0.000 0 | 0.282 5 | 0.183 1 | 0.427 1 | 0.183 1 | 0.155 4 | 0.000 0 | 0.033 3 | 0.126 6 | 0.488 1 | 0.187 9 | |
Idh-2 | Ho | 0.000 0 | 0.300 0 | 0.166 7 | 0.033 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.333 3 | 0.000 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.100 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.116 7 |
He | 0.000 0 | 0.259 3 | 0.157 6 | 0.033 3 | 0.155 4 | 0.282 5 | 0.000 0 | 0.065 5 | 0.096 6 | 0.000 0 | 0.105 0 | |
Mdh-1 | Ho | 0.233 3 | 0.400 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.200 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.300 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.166 7 | 0.213 3 |
He | 0.480 8 | 0.325 4 | 0.096 6 | 0.183 1 | 0.209 6 | 0.259 3 | 0.096 6 | 0.209 6 | 0.155 4 | 0.155 4 | 0.217 2 | |
Mdh-3 | Ho | 0.233 3 | 0.266 7 | 0.433 3 | 0.000 0 | 0.400 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.566 7 | 0.366 7 | 0.033 3 | 0.433 3 | 0.296 7 |
He | 0.381 4 | 0.235 0 | 0.345 2 | 0.000 0 | 0.325 4 | 0.209 6 | 0.413 0 | 0.304 5 | 0.033 3 | 0.381 4 | 0.262 9 | |
Pgd-1 | Ho | 0.066 7 | 0.600 0 | 0.400 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.100 0 | 0.133 3 | 0.300 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.033 3 | 0.176 9 |
平均值 Mean | He Ho He | 0.126 6 0.171 4 0.222 3 | 0.488 1 0.342 9 0.317 3 | 0.325 4 0.276 2 0.262 7 | 0.126 6 0.228 6 0.201 4 | 0.096 6 0.171 4 0.160 8 | 0.126 6 0.285 7 0.279 1 | 0.503 4 0.228 6 0.234 6 | 0.452 0 0.180 9 0.259 1 | 0.183 1 0.142 9 0.190 7 | 0.096 6 0.261 9 0.212 7 | 0.252 5 0.229 0 0.234 1 |
表4 云杉10个群体的单位点杂合度
Table 4 Observed heterozygosity at single locus detected in ten populations of Picea asperata
位点 Locus | 杂合度 Heterozy gosity | 小金 Xiaojin | 川盘 Chuanpan | 铁布 Tiebu | 阿坝 Aba | 黑水 Heishui | 卓尼 Zhuoni | 林坡 Linpo | 大录 Dalu | 巴西 Baxi | 热务沟 Rewugou | 平均值 Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | Ho | 0.100 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.266 7 | 0.133 3 | 0.100 0 | 0.533 3 | 0.100 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.233 3 | 0.193 3 |
He | 0.096 6 | 0.066 1 | 0.294 4 | 0.126 6 | 0.155 4 | 0.488 1 | 0.155 4 | 0.321 5 | 0.157 6 | 0.209 6 | 0.207 1 | |
Fdh-2 | Ho | 0.566 7 | 0.433 3 | 0.433 3 | 0.566 7 | 0.000 0 | 0.366 7 | 0.533 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.373 3 |
He | 0.470 6 | 0.564 4 | 0.436 7 | 0.513 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.431 6 | 0.474 0 | 0.427 1 | 0.582 5 | 0.157 6 | 0.405 8 | |
Idh-1 | Ho | 0.000 0 | 0.333 3 | 0.133 3 | 0.600 0 | 0.200 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.033 3 | 0.133 3 | 0.800 0 | 0.233 3 |
He | 0.000 0 | 0.282 5 | 0.183 1 | 0.427 1 | 0.183 1 | 0.155 4 | 0.000 0 | 0.033 3 | 0.126 6 | 0.488 1 | 0.187 9 | |
Idh-2 | Ho | 0.000 0 | 0.300 0 | 0.166 7 | 0.033 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.333 3 | 0.000 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.100 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.116 7 |
He | 0.000 0 | 0.259 3 | 0.157 6 | 0.033 3 | 0.155 4 | 0.282 5 | 0.000 0 | 0.065 5 | 0.096 6 | 0.000 0 | 0.105 0 | |
Mdh-1 | Ho | 0.233 3 | 0.400 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.200 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.300 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.166 7 | 0.213 3 |
He | 0.480 8 | 0.325 4 | 0.096 6 | 0.183 1 | 0.209 6 | 0.259 3 | 0.096 6 | 0.209 6 | 0.155 4 | 0.155 4 | 0.217 2 | |
Mdh-3 | Ho | 0.233 3 | 0.266 7 | 0.433 3 | 0.000 0 | 0.400 0 | 0.233 3 | 0.566 7 | 0.366 7 | 0.033 3 | 0.433 3 | 0.296 7 |
He | 0.381 4 | 0.235 0 | 0.345 2 | 0.000 0 | 0.325 4 | 0.209 6 | 0.413 0 | 0.304 5 | 0.033 3 | 0.381 4 | 0.262 9 | |
Pgd-1 | Ho | 0.066 7 | 0.600 0 | 0.400 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.100 0 | 0.133 3 | 0.300 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.066 7 | 0.033 3 | 0.176 9 |
平均值 Mean | He Ho He | 0.126 6 0.171 4 0.222 3 | 0.488 1 0.342 9 0.317 3 | 0.325 4 0.276 2 0.262 7 | 0.126 6 0.228 6 0.201 4 | 0.096 6 0.171 4 0.160 8 | 0.126 6 0.285 7 0.279 1 | 0.503 4 0.228 6 0.234 6 | 0.452 0 0.180 9 0.259 1 | 0.183 1 0.142 9 0.190 7 | 0.096 6 0.261 9 0.212 7 | 0.252 5 0.229 0 0.234 1 |
位点 Locus | 小金 Xaojin | 川盘 Chuanpan | 铁布 Tiebu | 阿坝 Aba | 黑水 Heishui | 卓尼 Zhuoni | 林坡 Linpo | 大录 Dalu | 巴西 Baxi | 热务沟 Rewugou |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | -0.052 6ns | -0.025 5ns | 0.078 87ns | -0.071 4ns | 0.345 5** | -0.111 1ns | 0.345 5* | 0.261 9ns | 0.075 3ns | -0.132 1ns |
Fdh-2 | -0.224 5ns | 0.219 2* | -0.009 7n | 0.123 3ns | ─ | 0.136 1ns | -0.144 2ns | 0.206 3ns | 0.418 0* | -0.075 3ns |
Idh-1 | ─ | -0.200 0n | 0.259 3ns | -0.428 6* | 0.111 1ns | 0.345 5* | ─ | -0.016 9ns | -0.071 4ns | -0.666 7* |
Idh-2 | ─ | -0.176 5n | -0.075 3ns | -0.016 9n | -0.090 9ns | -0.200 0ns | ─ | -0.034 5ns | -0.052 6ns | -0.090 9ns |
Mdh-1 | 0.506 5* | -0.250 0ns | -0.052 6n | -0.111 1ns | -0.132 1ns | -0.176 5ns | -0.052 6ns | -0.132 1ns | -0.090 9ns | -0.155 6ns |
Mdh-3 | 0.377 8* | -0.153 8ns | -0.276 6ns | ─ | -0.250 0ns | -0.132 1ns | -0.395 3* | -0.224 5ns | -0.016 9ns | ─ |
Pgd-1 | 0.464 3* | -0.250 0n | -0.250 0n | 0.464 3* | -0.052 6n | -0.071 4n | 0.393 9* | ─ | 0.629 6** | 0.649 1** |
表5 每群体多态位点固定指数F值及其χ2检验其偏离0值的程度
Table 5 Value of fixation index (inbreeding coefficient) F for polymorphic loci in the 10 populations of Picea asperata and its conformance to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium,ie. statistical difference of values from zero,which was tested using chi-square analysis
位点 Locus | 小金 Xaojin | 川盘 Chuanpan | 铁布 Tiebu | 阿坝 Aba | 黑水 Heishui | 卓尼 Zhuoni | 林坡 Linpo | 大录 Dalu | 巴西 Baxi | 热务沟 Rewugou |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | -0.052 6ns | -0.025 5ns | 0.078 87ns | -0.071 4ns | 0.345 5** | -0.111 1ns | 0.345 5* | 0.261 9ns | 0.075 3ns | -0.132 1ns |
Fdh-2 | -0.224 5ns | 0.219 2* | -0.009 7n | 0.123 3ns | ─ | 0.136 1ns | -0.144 2ns | 0.206 3ns | 0.418 0* | -0.075 3ns |
Idh-1 | ─ | -0.200 0n | 0.259 3ns | -0.428 6* | 0.111 1ns | 0.345 5* | ─ | -0.016 9ns | -0.071 4ns | -0.666 7* |
Idh-2 | ─ | -0.176 5n | -0.075 3ns | -0.016 9n | -0.090 9ns | -0.200 0ns | ─ | -0.034 5ns | -0.052 6ns | -0.090 9ns |
Mdh-1 | 0.506 5* | -0.250 0ns | -0.052 6n | -0.111 1ns | -0.132 1ns | -0.176 5ns | -0.052 6ns | -0.132 1ns | -0.090 9ns | -0.155 6ns |
Mdh-3 | 0.377 8* | -0.153 8ns | -0.276 6ns | ─ | -0.250 0ns | -0.132 1ns | -0.395 3* | -0.224 5ns | -0.016 9ns | ─ |
Pgd-1 | 0.464 3* | -0.250 0n | -0.250 0n | 0.464 3* | -0.052 6n | -0.071 4n | 0.393 9* | ─ | 0.629 6** | 0.649 1** |
基因位点 Locus | 固定指数Fis Inbreeding coefficieat | 配子贡献度 Fit | 群体间分化度Fst Differeatiation coefficient | 基因流Nm Gene flow | Heterogeneity of allele frequency χ2(p) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | 0.051 | 0.114 | 0.067 | 3.503 4 | ns |
Fdh-2 | 0.064 | 0.199 | 0.144 | 1.483 3 | * |
Idh-1 | -0.263 | 0.288 | 0.437 | 0.322 7 | *** |
Idh-2 | -0.130 | 0.468 | 0.529 | 0.222 8 | *** |
Mdh-1 | 0.001 | 0.391 | 0.391 | 0.389 6 | *** |
Mdh-3 | -0.141 8 | 0.191 | 0.295 | 0.598 2 | *** |
Pgd-1 | 0.288 | 0.546 | 0.363 | 0.439 4 | *** |
平均值Mean | 0.005 | 0.314 | 0.311 | 0.553 9 | *** |
表7 云杉10个群体7个多态位点上的F计量
Table 7 Summary of F-statistics at 7 loci of ten populations of Picea asperata
基因位点 Locus | 固定指数Fis Inbreeding coefficieat | 配子贡献度 Fit | 群体间分化度Fst Differeatiation coefficient | 基因流Nm Gene flow | Heterogeneity of allele frequency χ2(p) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | 0.051 | 0.114 | 0.067 | 3.503 4 | ns |
Fdh-2 | 0.064 | 0.199 | 0.144 | 1.483 3 | * |
Idh-1 | -0.263 | 0.288 | 0.437 | 0.322 7 | *** |
Idh-2 | -0.130 | 0.468 | 0.529 | 0.222 8 | *** |
Mdh-1 | 0.001 | 0.391 | 0.391 | 0.389 6 | *** |
Mdh-3 | -0.141 8 | 0.191 | 0.295 | 0.598 2 | *** |
Pgd-1 | 0.288 | 0.546 | 0.363 | 0.439 4 | *** |
平均值Mean | 0.005 | 0.314 | 0.311 | 0.553 9 | *** |
位点 Locus | 总遗传多样性HT The total gene diversity | 群体内遗传多样性HS The gene diversity within population | 群体间遗传多样性DST The gene diversity among populations | 遗传分化系数GST The coefficient of gene differentiation among population with species | 基因流Nm Gene flow |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | 0.218 2 | 0.203 6 | 0.014 6 | 0.066 9 | 3.503 4 |
Fdh-2 | 0.466 3 | 0.399 0 | 0.067 3 | 0.144 3 | 1.483 3 |
Idh-1 | 0.327 9 | 0.184 8 | 0.143 1 | 0.436 4 | 0.322 7 |
Idh-2 | 0.219 2 | 0.103 3 | 0.115 9 | 0.528 7 | 0.222 8 |
Mdh-1 | 0.350 6 | 0.213 6 | 0.137 0 | 0.390 8 | 0.389 6 |
Mdh-3 | 0.366 5 | 0.258 4 | 0.108 1 | 0.295 0 | 0.598 2 |
Pgd-1 | 0.389 6 | 0.248 3 | 0.141 3 | 0.362 7 | 0.439 4 |
平均值 Mean | 0.334 0 | 0.230 1 | 0.103 9 | 0.317 8 | 0.553 9 |
表6 云杉10个群体在不同位点上的基因多样性的构成和遗传分化
Table 6 Constitution and differentiation of gene diversity of 10 populations in Picea asperata at all loci
位点 Locus | 总遗传多样性HT The total gene diversity | 群体内遗传多样性HS The gene diversity within population | 群体间遗传多样性DST The gene diversity among populations | 遗传分化系数GST The coefficient of gene differentiation among population with species | 基因流Nm Gene flow |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aat-2 | 0.218 2 | 0.203 6 | 0.014 6 | 0.066 9 | 3.503 4 |
Fdh-2 | 0.466 3 | 0.399 0 | 0.067 3 | 0.144 3 | 1.483 3 |
Idh-1 | 0.327 9 | 0.184 8 | 0.143 1 | 0.436 4 | 0.322 7 |
Idh-2 | 0.219 2 | 0.103 3 | 0.115 9 | 0.528 7 | 0.222 8 |
Mdh-1 | 0.350 6 | 0.213 6 | 0.137 0 | 0.390 8 | 0.389 6 |
Mdh-3 | 0.366 5 | 0.258 4 | 0.108 1 | 0.295 0 | 0.598 2 |
Pgd-1 | 0.389 6 | 0.248 3 | 0.141 3 | 0.362 7 | 0.439 4 |
平均值 Mean | 0.334 0 | 0.230 1 | 0.103 9 | 0.317 8 | 0.553 9 |
[1] | Chen SY (陈少瑜), Wu LY (吴丽圆), Li JW (李江文), Xiang W (项伟), Zhou Y (周云) (2001). Study on genetic diversity of natural population of Taxus yunanensis. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 37(5),41-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993). Population genetic consequences of population size:implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 24,217-242. |
[3] | Fang JY (方精云) (1996). The distribution pattern of Chinese natural vegetation and its climatological and topographic interpretations. In: Fang JY (方精云) ed. Researches on Hotspots of Modern Ecology (现代生态学热点问题研究). China Science and Technology Press,Beijing,369-380. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Ge S (葛颂) (1988). Isozymes and studies on population genetic variation in forest trees. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (南京林业大学学报), 12(1),68-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Ge S (葛颂) (1989) Quantitative analysis of tree population variation by allozyme and analysis method. Journal of Southwest Forestry College (西南林学院学报), 9(1),84-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Gu WC (顾万春), Wang Q (王棋), You YT (游应天), Sun CL (孙翠玲) (1998). Introduction to Forestry Genetic Resources (森林遗传资源学概论). China Science and Technology Press, Beijing,1-296. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Gu WC (顾万春) (2004). Statistics Genetics (统计遗传学). Science Press, Beijing,1-422. (in Chinese) |
[8] | Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PS (2000). Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. American Journal of Botany, 87,782-792. |
[9] | Hamrick JL, Godt MJ (1989). Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown ADH, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS eds. Plant Population Genetic, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland,43-46. |
[10] | Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. Sherman-Broyes SL (1992). Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forest, 6,95-124. |
[11] | Kim ZS, Yi Cheng Ho, Seock woolee (1994). Genetc variation and sampling strategy for conversation in Pinus species.In: Kim Zin-Suh, Hans HH eds. Conversation and Manipulation of Genetic Resources in Forestry. Kwang Moon Kag, Soul,294-319. |
[12] | Ledig FT, Bermejo-Velázquez B, Hodgskiss PD, Johnson DR, Flores-López C, Jacob-Cervantes V (2000). The mating system and genetic diversity in Martínez spruce, an extremely rare endemic of México's Sierra Madre Oriental: an example of facultative selfing and survival in interglacial refugia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30,1156-1164. |
[13] | Li XQ (李晓清), Luo JX (罗建勋) (2001). A study on division of provenance of woodpulp stands of Picea asperata. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition) (四川农业大学学报(自然科学版)), 19,34-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Li B (李斌), Gu WC (顾万春), Lin FR (林富荣), Lu BM (卢宝明) (2003). Review on genetic diversity in Pinus. Hereditas (遗传), 25,740-748. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Zuo L (左林) (2001). A preliminary study on variation pattern of wood natural for Picea asperata plantation. Journal of Northwest Science-technology University of Agriculture and Forestry (Natural Science Edition) (西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)), 29(3),29~34. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Li XQ (李晓清), Sun P (孙鹏) (2003). Phenotypic variation in natural populations of Picea asperata. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 31(1),9-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Gu WC (顾万春) (2004a). Cone and seed variation of natural population in Picea asperata. Journal of Northwest Science-technology University of Agriculture and Forestry (Natural Science Edition) (西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)), 32(8),60-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Gu WC (顾万春) (2004b) Progress in genetic diversity of Picea at phenotype and allozyme level. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 17,255-262. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Luo JX (罗建勋) (2004). Genetic Diversity of Natural Populations in Picea asperata (云杉天然群体遗传多样性研究). PhD dissertation, Institute of Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry. Beijing,85-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Gu WC (顾万春) (2005). Study on phenotypic diversity of natural population in Picea asperata. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 41(2),66-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Modrzynski J, Prus Glowacki W (1998). 1972 province trial. Acta Societatis Botanicorium Poloniae, 67,75-82. |
[22] | Rajora OP, Mosseler A, Major JE (2000). Indicators of population viability in red spruce Picea rubens. Ⅱ.Genetic diversity,population structure and mating behaviour. Canadian Journal of Botany, 78,947-956. |
[23] | Slatkin M (1985). Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution, 39,52-65. |
[24] | Swofford DL, Selander RB (1989). BIOSIS-1, a computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Journal of Heredity, 72,281-283. |
[25] | Sun XX (孙雪新), Zha TS (查天山), Tao Y (陶毅) (1990). Isozyme variation of natural population in Picea crassifolia Koml. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology (甘肃林业科技), (2),11~15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Wang YH, Luo JX, Xue XM, Korpelainen H, Li CY (2005). Diversity of microsatellite markers in the populations of Picea asperata originating from the mountains of China. Plant Science, 168,707-714. |
[27] | Wu ZL (吴中伦) (1959). The distribution of major tree species in alpine forest area of western Sichuan and some proposals for regeneration report and planning of tree species for plantation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 5,465-478. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Yang YP (杨玉坡) (1983). The spruce in China. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology (四川林业科技), 4(3),28-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | Yang RC, Yeh FC (1993). Multilocus structure in Pinus contorta. Theoretical and Applied Gentics, 87,568-576. |
[30] | Zhang HG (张含国), Yang DH (杨大海), Wang FJ (王风君), Zhou Y (周云) (2000). Selection of allozyme loci and enzyme systems of Picea koraiensis. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 28(2),9-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Zhang HG (张含国), Sun LF (孙立夫), Han JF (韩继风), Feng BL (丰宝林) (2003). Study on the genetic diversity of Picea koraiensis. Bulletin of Botanical Rsearch (植物研究), 25,224-229. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] | Zhou SL (周世良), Zhang F (张方), Wang ZR (王中仁) (1998). Some advices for starch gel eletrophoresis in allozyme analysis. Chinese Bulletin of Botany (植物学通报), 15(5),68-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭敏, 罗林, 梁进, 王彦杰, 赵春章. 冻融变化对西南亚高山森林优势种云杉和华西箭竹根区土壤理化性质与酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 882-894. |
[2] | 赵长兴, 赵维俊, 张兴林, 刘思敏, 牟文博, 刘金荣. 祁连山排露沟流域青海云杉种群种内竞争与促进作用分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1027-1037. |
[3] | 陈天翌, 娄安如. 青藏高原东侧白桦种群的遗传多样性与遗传结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 561-568. |
[4] | 秦慧君, 焦亮, 周怡, 薛儒鸿, 柒常亮, 杜达石. 祁连山优势树木碳水化合物资源分配的海拔和树种效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 208-219. |
[5] | 杜军, 王文, 何志斌, 陈龙飞, 蔺鹏飞, 朱喜, 田全彦. 祁连山青海云杉物候表型的空间分异及其内在机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 834-843. |
[6] | 罗林, 黄艳, 梁进, 汪恩涛, 胡君, 贺合亮, 赵春章. 西南亚高山针叶林主要树种互作及增温对根区土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 875-884. |
[7] | 赵阳, 刘锦乾, 陈学龙, 杨萌萌, 曹家豪, 齐瑞, 曹秀文. 洮河上游紫果云杉种群结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3): 266-276. |
[8] | 拓锋, 刘贤德, 刘润红, 赵维俊, 敬文茂, 马剑, 武秀荣, 赵晶忠, 马雪娥. 祁连山大野口流域青海云杉种群空间格局及其关联性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11): 1172-1183. |
[9] | 张新新, 王茜, 胡颖, 周玮, 陈晓阳, 胡新生. 植物边缘种群遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5): 383-395. |
[10] | 苑丹阳, 朱良军, 张远东, 李宗善, 赵慧颖, 王晓春. 吉林老白山鱼鳞云杉树轮蓝光强度和轮宽指数与气候响应关系随海拔变化的对比[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(12): 1061-1078. |
[11] | 陈文静, 贡璐, 刘雨桐. 季节性雪被对天山雪岭云杉凋落叶分解和碳氮磷释放的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4): 487-497. |
[12] | 杨军军, 封建民, 何志斌. 基于热比率法的青海云杉林蒸腾量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 195-201. |
[13] | 张俪文, 韩广轩. 植物遗传多样性与生态系统功能关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 977-989. |
[14] | 王力, 张芸, 孔昭宸, 杨振京, 阎顺, 李月丛. 新疆天山南坡吐鲁番地区表土花粉的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(7): 779-786. |
[15] | 王锦楠, 陈进福, 陈武生, 周新洋, 许东, 李际红, 亓晓. 柴达木地区野生黑果枸杞种群遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10): 1003-1011. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19