植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 539-544.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0071
所属专题: 碳储量
• 论文 • 下一篇
收稿日期:
2005-10-17
接受日期:
2005-12-14
出版日期:
2006-10-17
发布日期:
2006-07-30
通讯作者:
刘国华
作者简介:
*E-mail:ghliu@rcees.ac.cn基金资助:
HU Hui-Feng1, WANG Zhi-Heng2, LIU Guo-Hua1,*(), FU Bo-Jie1
Received:
2005-10-17
Accepted:
2005-12-14
Online:
2006-10-17
Published:
2006-07-30
Contact:
LIU Guo-Hua
摘要:
在广泛收集资料的基础上,利用植被平均碳密度方法,估算了我国6种主要灌丛植被的碳储量,并分析了其区域分布特征。主要结果如下:1) 6种灌丛植被总面积为15 462.64 ×104 hm2,总碳储量为1.68±0.12 Pg C (1 Pg=1015g),灌丛植被平均碳密度为10.88±0.77 Mg C·hm-2(1 Mg=106 g),不同植被类型差异较大,在5.92~17 Mg C·hm-2之间波动。2)从区域分布来看,西南3省(云南、贵州、四川)既是我国灌丛主要的分布地区之一,分布面积占6种灌丛总面积的23.5%,又是我国灌丛碳储量的主要储库,碳储量占整个6种灌丛碳储量的1/3(32.6%),适宜的水热条件决定了该地区的植被平均碳密度要高于全国平均水平。3) 与我国森林和草地的植被碳储量相比,这些灌丛碳储量相当于我国森林和草地碳储量的27%~40%和36%~55%。
胡会峰, 王志恒, 刘国华, 傅伯杰. 中国主要灌丛植被碳储量. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 539-544. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0071
HU Hui-Feng, WANG Zhi-Heng, LIU Guo-Hua, FU Bo-Jie. VEGETATION CARBON STORAGE OF MAJOR SHRUBLANDS IN CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(4): 539-544. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0071
灌丛类型 Shrublands types | 生物量 Biomass (t·hm-2) | 地下(B)和地上(A)的关系 The relationship between belowground (B) and aboveground (A) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
样本数 Samples | 平均±标准差 Mean±SE | 关系 Relationship | ||
热带海滨硬叶常绿阔叶灌丛、矮林1) | 3 | 11.84±1.36 | A/B=2.10 n=3 | |
温带、亚热带落叶灌丛、矮林2) | 78 | 12.48±1.25 | B=-1 558.15+1.97A R2=0.785 p<0.01 n=8 | |
温带、亚热带亚高山落叶灌丛3) | 55 | 15.49±1.83 | B=678.56+1.22A R2=0.578 p<0.01 n=13 | |
亚热带、热带石灰岩具有多种藤本的常绿、落叶灌 丛、矮林4) | 8 | 24.22±4.22 | A/B=1.40 n=7 | |
亚热带、热带酸性土常绿、落叶阔叶灌丛、矮林和草 甸结合5) | 17 | 34.00±4.64 | A/B=0.62 n=7 | |
亚热带高山、亚高山常绿革质叶灌丛、矮林6) | 10 | 23.48±3.48 | A/B=1.17 n=8 | |
总计 Total | 171 | 21.76±1.10 |
表1 计算我国主要灌丛植被生物量的基本参数
Table 1 Basic parameters of calculating major shrublands vegetation biomass
灌丛类型 Shrublands types | 生物量 Biomass (t·hm-2) | 地下(B)和地上(A)的关系 The relationship between belowground (B) and aboveground (A) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
样本数 Samples | 平均±标准差 Mean±SE | 关系 Relationship | ||
热带海滨硬叶常绿阔叶灌丛、矮林1) | 3 | 11.84±1.36 | A/B=2.10 n=3 | |
温带、亚热带落叶灌丛、矮林2) | 78 | 12.48±1.25 | B=-1 558.15+1.97A R2=0.785 p<0.01 n=8 | |
温带、亚热带亚高山落叶灌丛3) | 55 | 15.49±1.83 | B=678.56+1.22A R2=0.578 p<0.01 n=13 | |
亚热带、热带石灰岩具有多种藤本的常绿、落叶灌 丛、矮林4) | 8 | 24.22±4.22 | A/B=1.40 n=7 | |
亚热带、热带酸性土常绿、落叶阔叶灌丛、矮林和草 甸结合5) | 17 | 34.00±4.64 | A/B=0.62 n=7 | |
亚热带高山、亚高山常绿革质叶灌丛、矮林6) | 10 | 23.48±3.48 | A/B=1.17 n=8 | |
总计 Total | 171 | 21.76±1.10 |
灌丛类型 Shrublands types | 面积 Area (104 hm2) | 碳密度 Carbon density (Mg C·hm-2) Mean±SE | 碳储量 Carbon storage (Tg C) Mean±SE |
---|---|---|---|
热带海滨硬叶常绿阔叶灌丛、矮林1) | 0.26 | 5.92±0.96 | 0.02 |
温带、亚热带落叶灌丛、矮林2) | 7 476.35 | 6.24±0.88 | 462.80±65.79 |
温带、亚热带亚高山落叶灌丛3) | 563.48 | 7.74±1.30 | 43.64±7.32 |
亚热带、热带石灰岩具有多种藤本的常绿、落叶灌丛、矮林4) | 1 539.51 | 12.11±2.99 | 186.45±46.03 |
亚热带、热带酸性土常绿、落叶阔叶灌丛、矮林和草甸结合5) | 5 598.52 | 17.00±3.28 | 951.67±183.63 |
亚热带高山、亚高山常绿革质叶灌丛、矮林6) | 284.53 | 11.74±2.46 | 33.40±7.00 |
总计 Total | 15 462.64 | 10.88±0.77 | 1 681.98±119.06 |
表2 我国主要灌丛植被类型的碳密度和碳储量
Table 2 The carbon density and the storage of Chinese major shrublands types
灌丛类型 Shrublands types | 面积 Area (104 hm2) | 碳密度 Carbon density (Mg C·hm-2) Mean±SE | 碳储量 Carbon storage (Tg C) Mean±SE |
---|---|---|---|
热带海滨硬叶常绿阔叶灌丛、矮林1) | 0.26 | 5.92±0.96 | 0.02 |
温带、亚热带落叶灌丛、矮林2) | 7 476.35 | 6.24±0.88 | 462.80±65.79 |
温带、亚热带亚高山落叶灌丛3) | 563.48 | 7.74±1.30 | 43.64±7.32 |
亚热带、热带石灰岩具有多种藤本的常绿、落叶灌丛、矮林4) | 1 539.51 | 12.11±2.99 | 186.45±46.03 |
亚热带、热带酸性土常绿、落叶阔叶灌丛、矮林和草甸结合5) | 5 598.52 | 17.00±3.28 | 951.67±183.63 |
亚热带高山、亚高山常绿革质叶灌丛、矮林6) | 284.53 | 11.74±2.46 | 33.40±7.00 |
总计 Total | 15 462.64 | 10.88±0.77 | 1 681.98±119.06 |
各省区 Province | 总面积 Area (104 hm2) | 总碳量 Total (Tg C) |
---|---|---|
安徽 Anhui | 368.30 | 40.55 |
北京 Beijing | 73.07 | 4.56 |
福建 Fujian | 587.42 | 99.74 |
甘肃 Gansu | 382.09 | 25.79 |
广东 Guangdonga | 520.19 | 86.67 |
广西 Guangxi | 529.27 | 74.84 |
贵州 Guizhou | 1 129.35 | 174.38 |
海南 Hainan | 120.23 | 20.23 |
河北 Hebei | 527.66 | 32.95 |
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 827.29 | 51.65 |
河南 Henan | 434.94 | 27.16 |
湖北 Hubei | 693.33 | 49.09 |
湖南 Hunan | 660.34 | 103.13 |
江苏 Jiangsub | 5.51 | 0.34 |
江西 Jiangxi | 680.40 | 113.27 |
吉林 Jilin | 402.17 | 25.11 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 424.32 | 26.49 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 1 358.33 | 84.81 |
宁夏 Ningxia | 30.30 | 1.89 |
青海 Qinghai | 267.71 | 18.61 |
山东 Shandong | 134.90 | 8.42 |
陕西 Shaanxi | 704.34 | 45.69 |
山西 Shanxi | 643.71 | 40.19 |
四川 Sichuanc | 1 022.34 | 138.27 |
天津 Tianjin | 2.58 | 0.16 |
新疆 Xinjiang | 508.27 | 31.73 |
西藏 Xizang | 471.09 | 42.55 |
云南 Yunnan | 1 484.23 | 236.01 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 468.98 | 77.70 |
全国 All | 15 462.64 | 1 681.98 |
表3 各省(区)主要灌丛植被类型的碳储量
Table 3 The carbon storage of major shrublands types in different provinces
各省区 Province | 总面积 Area (104 hm2) | 总碳量 Total (Tg C) |
---|---|---|
安徽 Anhui | 368.30 | 40.55 |
北京 Beijing | 73.07 | 4.56 |
福建 Fujian | 587.42 | 99.74 |
甘肃 Gansu | 382.09 | 25.79 |
广东 Guangdonga | 520.19 | 86.67 |
广西 Guangxi | 529.27 | 74.84 |
贵州 Guizhou | 1 129.35 | 174.38 |
海南 Hainan | 120.23 | 20.23 |
河北 Hebei | 527.66 | 32.95 |
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 827.29 | 51.65 |
河南 Henan | 434.94 | 27.16 |
湖北 Hubei | 693.33 | 49.09 |
湖南 Hunan | 660.34 | 103.13 |
江苏 Jiangsub | 5.51 | 0.34 |
江西 Jiangxi | 680.40 | 113.27 |
吉林 Jilin | 402.17 | 25.11 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 424.32 | 26.49 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 1 358.33 | 84.81 |
宁夏 Ningxia | 30.30 | 1.89 |
青海 Qinghai | 267.71 | 18.61 |
山东 Shandong | 134.90 | 8.42 |
陕西 Shaanxi | 704.34 | 45.69 |
山西 Shanxi | 643.71 | 40.19 |
四川 Sichuanc | 1 022.34 | 138.27 |
天津 Tianjin | 2.58 | 0.16 |
新疆 Xinjiang | 508.27 | 31.73 |
西藏 Xizang | 471.09 | 42.55 |
云南 Yunnan | 1 484.23 | 236.01 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 468.98 | 77.70 |
全国 All | 15 462.64 | 1 681.98 |
植被类型 Vegetation types | 总面积 Area (M hm2) | 碳密度 (Mg C·hm-2) Carbon density | 总碳量 (Pg C) Carbon storage | 文献来源 Refrences |
---|---|---|---|---|
森林 Forests | 105.82 | 44.91 | 4.75 | Fang et al., 2001 |
108.64 | 38.67 | 4.20 | 刘国华等,2000;Liu et al., 2000 | |
108.62 | 57.07 | 6.20 | 周玉荣等,2000;Zhou et al., 2000 | |
41.32 | 3.78 | 赵敏和周广胜,2004;Zhao & Zhou, 2004 | ||
草地 Grasslands | 406.00 | 11.50 | 4.66 | Ni,2001 |
299.00 | 11.50 | 3.06 | Ni,2002 | |
灌丛 Shrublands | 175.78 | 45.60 | 8.02 | Ni,2001 |
154.63 | 10.88 | 1.68 | 本文 This paper | |
世界灌丛World shrublands | 2 650 | 27.90 | Woodwell et al.,1978a |
表4 我国森林、草地、灌丛和世界灌丛植被碳储量
Table 4 The carbon storage of Chinese forests, grasslands and shrublands and world shrublands
植被类型 Vegetation types | 总面积 Area (M hm2) | 碳密度 (Mg C·hm-2) Carbon density | 总碳量 (Pg C) Carbon storage | 文献来源 Refrences |
---|---|---|---|---|
森林 Forests | 105.82 | 44.91 | 4.75 | Fang et al., 2001 |
108.64 | 38.67 | 4.20 | 刘国华等,2000;Liu et al., 2000 | |
108.62 | 57.07 | 6.20 | 周玉荣等,2000;Zhou et al., 2000 | |
41.32 | 3.78 | 赵敏和周广胜,2004;Zhao & Zhou, 2004 | ||
草地 Grasslands | 406.00 | 11.50 | 4.66 | Ni,2001 |
299.00 | 11.50 | 3.06 | Ni,2002 | |
灌丛 Shrublands | 175.78 | 45.60 | 8.02 | Ni,2001 |
154.63 | 10.88 | 1.68 | 本文 This paper | |
世界灌丛World shrublands | 2 650 | 27.90 | Woodwell et al.,1978a |
[1] | Connolly-McCarthy BJ, Grigal DF (1985). Biomass of shrub-dominated wetlands in Minnesota. Forest Science, 31, 1011-1017. |
[2] | Dai XB ( 戴晓兵) (1989). The seasonal dynamics of the biomass of Vitex shrubland in mountainous area of Huairou County in Beijing. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 31, 307-315. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] |
Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci LJ (2001). Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292, 2320-2322.
DOI URL PMID |
[4] | Forrest GI (1971). Structure and production of North Pennire blandet bog vegetation. Journal of Ecology, 59, 453-479. |
[5] |
Goodale CL, Davidson EA (2002). Uncertain sinks in the shrubs. Nature, 418, 593-594.
URL PMID |
[6] |
Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbagy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH (2002). Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature, 418, 623-626.
URL PMID |
[7] | He JS ( 贺金生), Wang QB ( 王其兵), Hu D ( 胡东) (1997). Studies on the biomass of typical shrubland and their regeneration capacity after cutting. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 21, 512-520. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Hou XY ( 侯学煜) (1982). Vegetation map of the People's Republic of China(中华人民共和国植被图). China Map Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[9] | Jiang FQ ( 姜凤岐), Lu FY ( 卢凤勇) (1982). The model of estinating above-ground biomass of Caragana microphylla Brush. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2, 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Liu GH ( 刘国华), Fu BJ ( 傅伯杰), Fang JY ( 方精云) (2000). Carbon dynamics of Chinese forests and its contribution to global carbon balance. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 20, 733-740. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Liu GH ( 刘国华), Zhang JY ( 张洁瑜), Zhang YX ( 张育新), Zhou JY ( 周建云), Guan WB ( 关文彬), Ma KM ( 马克明), Fu BJ ( 傅伯杰) (2003a). Distribution regulation of aboveground biomass of three main shrub types in the dry valley of Minjiang River. Journal of Mountain Science (山地学报), 21, 24-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Liu GH ( 刘国华), Ma KM ( 马克明), Fu BJ ( 傅伯杰), Guan WB ( 关文彬), Kang YX ( 康永祥), Zhou JY ( 周建云), Liu SL ( 刘世梁) (2003b). Aboveground biomass of main shrubs in dry valley of Minjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23, 1757-1764. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Ni J (2001). Carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: estimates at different spatial resolutions and their responses to climate change. Climatic Change, 49, 339-358. |
[14] | Ni J (2002). Carbon storage in grasslands of China. Journal of Arid Environments, 50, 205-218. |
[15] | Ni J (2004). Forage yield-based carbon storage in grasslands of China. Climatic Change, 67, 237-246. |
[16] | Olson JS, Watts JA, Allison LJ (1983). Carbon in Live Vegetation of Major World Ecosystems. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, ORNL-5862. |
[17] | Prentice IC (1993). Biome modelling and the carbon cycle. In: Heimann M ed. The Global Carbon Cycle. Springer, Berlin, 219-238. |
[18] | Shangguan TL ( 上官铁梁), Zhang F ( 张峰) (1989). The community characteristics and biomass of Ostryopsis davidiana in Yunding Mountain. Journal of Shanxi University(Natural Science Edition) (山西大学学报(自然科学版)), 12, 347-352. (in Chinese) |
[19] |
Sturm M, Racine C, Tape K (2001). Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature, 411, 546-547.
URL PMID |
[20] |
Wang XK ( 王效科), Feng ZW ( 冯宗炜), Ouyang ZY ( 欧阳志云) (2001). Vegetation carbon storage and density of forest ecosystems in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 12, 13-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
URL PMID |
[21] | Whittaker RH (1961). Estimation of net primary production of forest and shrub communities. Ecology, 42, 177-180. |
[22] | Whittaker RH (1962). Net production relations of shrubs in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology, 43, 357-377. |
[23] |
Woodwell GM, Whittaker RH, Reiners WA, Likens GE, Delwiche CC, Botkin DB (1978). The biota and the world carbon budget. Science, 199, 141-146.
URL PMID |
[24] | Zhao M ( 赵敏), Zhou GS ( 周广胜) (2004). Carbon storage of forest vegetation and its relationship with climatic factors. Scientia Geographica Sinica (地理科学), 24, 50-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Zhou YR ( 周玉荣), Yu ZL ( 于振良), Zhao SD ( 赵士洞) (2000). Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 24, 518-522. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 杨安娜, 李曾燕, 牟凌, 杨柏钰, 赛碧乐, 张立, 张增可, 王万胜, 杜运才, 由文辉, 阎恩荣. 上海大金山岛不同植被类型土壤细菌群落的变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 377-389. |
[2] | 韩聪, 母艳梅, 查天山, 秦树高, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕. 2012-2016年宁夏盐池毛乌素沙地黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统通量观测数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1322-1332. |
[3] | 张琦, 冯可, 常智慧, 何双辉, 徐维启. 灌丛化对林草交错带植物和土壤微生物的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 770-781. |
[4] | 李红琴, 张亚茹, 张法伟, 马文婧, 罗方林, 王春雨, 杨永胜, 张雷明, 李英年. 增强回归树模型在青藏高原高寒灌丛通量数据插补中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1437-1447. |
[5] | 高璐鑫, 兰天元, 赵志霞, 邓舒雨, 熊高明, 谢宗强, 申国珍. 中国中亚热带北部灌丛群落植物空间周转及其驱动因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1411-1421. |
[6] | 刘秋蓉, 李丽, 罗垚, 陈冬东, 黄鑫, 胡君, 刘庆. 四川巴塘海子山高寒灌丛群落的基本特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1334-1341. |
[7] | 要振宇, 史亚博, 马文红, 赵利清, 菊花, 浩仁塔本, 苏闯, 张芯毓, 梁存柱. 内蒙古地区虎榛子群系的群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1342-1349. |
[8] | 张零念, 朱贵青, 杨宽, 刘星月, 巩合德, 郑丽. 滇中云南杨梅灌丛主要木本植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1400-1410. |
[9] | 马龙龙, 杜灵通, 丹杨, 王乐, 乔成龙, 吴宏玥. 基于茎流-蒸渗仪法的荒漠草原带人工灌丛群落蒸散特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 807-818. |
[10] | 曹嘉瑜, 刘建峰, 袁泉, 徐德宇, 樊海东, 陈海燕, 谭斌, 刘立斌, 叶铎, 倪健. 森林与灌丛的灌木性状揭示不同的生活策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(7): 715-729. |
[11] | 陈国鹏, 杨克彤, 王立, 王飞, 曹秀文, 陈林生. 甘肃南部7种高寒杜鹃生物量分配的异速生长关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(10): 1040-1049. |
[12] | 丁威,王玉冰,向官海,迟永刚,鲁顺保,郑淑霞. 小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 33-43. |
[13] | 柴永福, 许金石, 刘鸿雁, 刘全儒, 郑成洋, 康慕谊, 梁存柱, 王仁卿, 高贤明, 张峰, 福臣, 刘晓, 岳明. 华北地区主要灌丛群落物种组成及系统发育结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 793-805. |
[14] | 唐丽丽, 杨彤, 刘鸿雁, 康慕谊, 王仁卿, 张峰, 高贤明, 岳明, 张梅, 郑璞帆, 石福臣. 华北地区荆条灌丛分布及物种多样性空间分异 规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 825-833. |
[15] | 岑宇, 王成栋, 张震, 任侠, 刘美珍, 杨帆. 河北省天然草地生物量和碳密度空间分布格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 265-276. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19