施肥对落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤呼吸的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2007.0045

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以落叶松(Larix gmelinii)和水曲柳(Fraxinus mandshurica)人工林为研究对象,采用动态气室法(LI-6400-09叶室连接到LI-6400便携式CO₂/H₂O分析系统)对两种林分的土壤呼吸速率进行了观测,探讨了细根生物量、根中氮含量与土壤呼吸速率的关系,以及施肥对细根生物量、根中氮含量和土壤呼吸速率的影响。结果表明:1)施肥导致落叶松和水曲柳林分的活细根生物量降低18.4%和27.4%, 死细根生物量分别降低了34.8%和127.4%;2)施肥使落叶松和水曲柳林地土壤呼吸速率与对照相比分别减少了34.9%和25.8%;3)施肥对根中氮含量没有显著影响;4)落叶松和水曲柳林地的土壤呼吸与土壤温度表现出相同的季节变化,两种林分的土壤呼吸速率与地下5和10 cm处的温度表现出明显的指数关系,其相关性R²=0.93~0.98。土壤呼吸温度系数Q₁₀的范围在2.45~3.29。施肥处理对Q₁₀没有产生影响,施肥处理导致细根生物量减少可能是引起林地土壤呼吸速率下降的主要原因。

关键词: 施肥, 细根生物量, 细根氮含量, 土壤呼吸, 落叶松, 水曲柳

Abstract:

Aims Soil respiration is important in carbon flux and changes in carbon cycling in forest soil. Understanding belowground response to fertilization is critical in assessing soil carbon dynamics and atmospheric nitrogen deposition. The objectives of this study were to: 1) compare soil respiration rates between Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica plantations in the same field site, 2) examine the effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil respiration rate in both plantations, and 3) analyze the relationships between soil respiration rate and soil temperature, fine root biomass and nitrogen contents.
Methods In May 2002, we established six plots in each plantation type at the Maoershan Forest Research Station, and from 2003 to 2005 we fertilized three plots and left three unfertilized as the control. We placed ten soil chambers randomly in each plot in July 2004 and measured soil respiration rates using a soil chamber system from August 2004 to October 2005. At the same time, we estimated fine root standing biomass in each plot by sampling eight soil cores monthly, calculated dry mass and analyzed nitrogen content for each fine root sample.
Important findings Fine root standing biomass of F. mandshurica (229 g·m^-2) was greater than that of L. gmelinii (158 g·m^-2), and the average difference in soil respiration rates during the growing season was 19.8%. Nitrogen fertilization significantly decreased fine root standing biomass 27.4% in F. mandshurica and 18.4% in L. gmelinii; soil respiration rate was decreased 25.8% and 34.9% respectively. However, nitrogen fertilization did not change fine root nitrogen contents. In both plantation types, soil respiration rate exhibited significant exponential relationships with soil temperature (R ²=0.93-0.98). The range of Q₁₀ values was 2.45-2.62 for F. mandshurica and 3.02-3.29 for L. gmelinii. Nonetheless, nitrogen fertilization did not impact Q₁₀ values in either plantation type; the difference of Q₁₀ between fertilized and unfertilized was less 1%. Nitrogen fertilization in L. gmelinii and F. mandshurica did not alter nitrogen contents in fine roots or Q₁₀ values, but decreased fine root standing biomass, which suggests that reduction of soil respiration rate in fertilized plantations was caused by the decreases of fine root standing biomass.

Key words: nitrogen fertilization, fine root biomass, fine root nitrogen contents, soil respiration, Larix gmelinii, Fraxinus mandshurica

贾淑霞, 王政权, 梅莉, 孙王月, 全先奎, 史建伟, 于水强, 孙海龙, 谷加存. 施肥对落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤呼吸的影响. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 372-379. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0045

JIA Shu-Xia, WANG Zheng-Quan, MEI Li, SUN Yue, QUAN Xian-Kui, SHI Jian-Wei, YU Shui-Qiang, SUN Hai-Long, GU Jia-Cun. EFFECT OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOIL RESPIRATION IN LARIX GMELINII AND FRAXINUS MANDSHURICA PLANTATIONS IN CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 372-379. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0045

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0045

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2007/V31/I3/372

图/表 7

图1 施肥和不施肥处理对水曲柳和落叶松林地土壤平均呼吸速率的影响图中字母“s”代表差异显著(p<0.05)

Fig.1 The effects of fertilizer on soil respiration rate of Fraxinus mandshurica (FM) and Larix gmelinii (LG) plantation Letter “s” represents significant difference (p<0.05)

图2 施肥和不施肥处理对水曲柳和落叶松根系生物量的影响图中字母“s”代表差异显著(p<0.05),“ns"代表差异不显著

Fig.2 The effects of fertilizer on fine root biomass of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantation Letter “s" represents significant difference (p<0.05), “ns" represents no significant difference

图3 施肥和不施肥处理对水曲柳和落叶松根系(直径<2 mm)死生物量影响图注见图1

Fig.3 The effects of fertilizer on necromass (diameter<2 mm) of Fraxinus mandshurica (FM) and Larix gmelinii (LG) plantation Notes see Fig. 1

图4 施肥处理对水曲柳和落叶松根系氮含量的影响图注见图2

Fig.4 The effects of fertilizer on the N content of root of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantation Notes see Fig. 2

图5 施肥和不施肥处理对水曲柳和落叶松林地土壤呼吸季节影响

Fig.5 The effects of fertilizer on seasonal dynamics of soil respiration rate of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantation

图6 水曲柳和落叶松林地施肥和不施肥处理土壤呼吸速率与土壤5和10 cm温度关系

Fig.6 The relationship of soil respiration rate and soil temperature at 5 and 10 cm in fertilized and unfertilized plot of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantation

表1 水曲柳和落叶松林地土壤呼吸速率指数模型和Q10值

Table 1 Soil respiration rate Arrhenius models and Q10 in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantations

树种 Species	处理 Treatment	土壤深度 Soil depth (cm)	a	b	R²	p	Q₁₀
水曲柳	对照Unfertlized	5	0.981 1	0.089 6	0.98	0.000 2	2.45
Fraxinus mandshurica		10	1.037 3	0.095 6	0.93	0.001 8	2.60
	施肥Fertilized	5	0.697 5	0.090 4	0.98	0.001 8	2.47
		10	0.739 0	0.096 4	0.93	0.001 8	2.62
落叶松	对照Unfertlized	5	0.600 7	0.111 5	0.97	0.000 5	3.05
Larix gmelinii		10	0.653 7	0.119 1	0.94	0.001 3	3.29
	施肥Fertilized	5	0.453 7	0.110 5	0.97	0.000 4	3.02
		10	0.494 9	0.117 9	0.95	0.001 1	3.25

参考文献 42

[1]	Bloom AJ, Sukrapanna SS, Warner RL(1992). Root respiration associated with ammonium and nitrate absorption and assimilation by barley. Plant Physiology, 99, 1294-1301. DOI URL PMID
[2]	Borken W, Xu YJ(2002). Site and temporal variation of soil respiration in European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine forests. Global Change Biology, 8, 1205-1216.
[3]	Bowden RD, Davidson E, Savage K, Arabia C, Steudler P(2004). Chronic nitrogen additions reduce total soil respiration and microbial respiration in temperate forest soils at the Harvard Forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 196, 43-56.
[4]	Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Ruess RW(2002). Root respiration in North American forests: effects of nitrogen concentration and temperature across biomes. Oecologia, 131, 559-568. DOI URL PMID
[5]	Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 136-137.
[6]	Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghon RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J(1994). Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263, 185-190. DOI URL PMID
[7]	Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD(1997). The ecology of root lifespan. Advance in Ecological Research, 27, 1-60.
[8]	Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD, Whitbeck JL(2000). Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytologist, 147, 33-42.
[9]	Fox TR (2000). Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 138, 187-202.
[10]	Frey SD, Knorr M, Parrent JL, Simpson RT(2004). Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 196, 159-171.
[11]	Gallardo A, Schlesinger WH(1994). Factors limiting microbial biomass in the mineral soil and forest floor of a warm-temperate forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 26, 1409-1415.
[12]	Gower ST, Vogt KA, Grier CC(1992). Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecological Monographs, 62, 43-65.
[13]	Haynes BE, Gower ST(1995). Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. Tree Physiology, 15, 317-325. DOI URL PMID
[14]	Hendricks JJ, Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD(1993). Assessing the role of fine roots in carbon and nutrient cycling. Trends of Ecology and Evolution, 8, 174-178. DOI URL PMID
[15]	Kane ES, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ(2003). Soil respiration along environmental gradients in Olympic National Park. Ecosystems, 6, 326-335.
[16]	Kang S, Doh S, Lee D (2003). Topographic and climatic controls on soil respiration in six temperate mixed-hardwood forest slopes, Korea. Global Change Biology, 9, 1427-1437.
[17]	Kieth H, Jacobsen KL, Raison RJ(1997). Effects of soil phosphorus availability, temperature and moisture on soil respiration in Eucalyptus pauciflora forest. Plant and Soil, 190, 127-141.
[18]	King JS, Albaugh TJ, Lee AH, Buford M, Strain BR, Dougherty P(2002). Belowground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytologist, 154, 389-398.
[19]	King JS, Pregitzer KS(2001). Fine-root biomass and fluxes of soil carbon in young stands of paper birch and trembling aspen as affected by elevated atmospheric CO₂ and tropospheric O₃. Oecologia, 128, 237-250. DOI URL PMID
[20]	King JS, Thomas RB, Strain BR(1996). Growth and carbon accumulation in root systems of Pinus taeda and Pinus ponderosa seedlings as affected by varying CO₂, temperature and nitrogen. Tree Physiology, 16, 635-642. DOI URL PMID
[21]	Lee KH, Jose SB(2003). Soil respiration, fine root production and microbial biomass in cottonwood and loblolly pine plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. Forest Ecology and Management, 185, 263-273.
[22]	Liu SH(刘绍辉), Fang JY(方精云), Kiyota M (1998). Soil respiration of mountainous temperate forests in Beijing, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 22, 119-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Majdi H (2001). Changes in fine root production and longevity in relation to water and nutrient availability in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden. Tree Physiology, 21, 1057-1061. URL PMID
[24]	Mei L(梅莉), Wang ZQ(王政权), Cheng YH(程云环), Guo DL(郭大立)(2004). A review: factors influencing fine root longevity in forest ecosystem. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28, 704-710. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	Norby RJ, Jackson RB(2000). Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytologist, 147, 3-12.
[26]	Ohashi M, Gyokusen K, Saito A(1999). Measurement of carbon dioxide evolution from a Japanese ceder ( Cryptomeria japonica D.Don ) forest floor using an open-flow chamber method. Forest Ecology and Management, 123, 105-114.
[27]	Olsson P, Linder S, Giesler R, Høgberg P(2005). Fertilization of boreal forest reduces both autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration. Global Change Biology, 11, 1745-1753. DOI URL
[28]	Post WM, Emanuel WR (1982). Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 298, 156-159.
[29]	Pregitzer KS, King JS, Burton AJ(2000). Responses of tree fine roots to temperature. New Phytologist, 147, 105-115.
[30]	Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Curtis PS(1995). Atomspheric CO₂ soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots. New Phytologist, 129, 579-585.
[31]	Raich JW, Schlesinger WH(1992). The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus, 44B, 81-99.
[32]	Raich JW, Tufekcioglu A(2000). Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry, 48, 71-90.
[33]	Raich JW, Potter CS(1995). Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 23-36.
[34]	Ryan MG, Lavigne MG, Gower ST(1997). Annual carbon cost of autotrophic respiration in boreal forest ecosystem in relation to species and climate. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 28871-28883.
[35]	Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA(2000). Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry, 48, 7-20.
[36]	Striegl RG, Wickland KP(2001). Soil respiration and photosynthetic uptake of carbon dioxide by ground-cover plants in four ages of jack pine forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 1540-1550.
[37]	Thierron V, Laudelout H(1996). Contribution of root respiration to total CO₂ efflux from the soil of a deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26, 1142-1148.
[38]	Wang CK(王传宽), Yang JY(杨金艳)(2005). Carbon dioxide fluxes from soil respiration and woody debris decomposition in boreal forests. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 633-638. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	Wang WJ(王文杰), Wang HM(王慧梅), Zu YG(祖元刚), Li XY(李雪莹), Koike T (2005). Characteristics of root, stem and soil respiration Q₁₀ temperature coefficients in forest ecosystems. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29, 680-691. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	Widén B, Majdi H(2001). Soil CO₂ efflux and root respiration at three sites in a mixed pine and spruce forest: seasonal and diurnal variation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 786-796. DOI URL
[41]	Xu M, Qi Y(2001). Spatial and seasonal variations of Q₁₀ determined by soil respiration measurements at a Sierra Nevada Forest. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15, 687-696. DOI URL
[42]	Yang YS(杨玉盛), Dong B(董彬), Xie JS(谢锦升), Chen GS(陈光水), Gao R(高人), Li L(李灵), Wang XG(王小国), Guo JF(郭剑芬)(2004). Soil respiration of forest ecosystems and its respondence to global change. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 24, 583-591. (in Chinese with English abstract)