华北地区胡桃楸林分布规律及群落构建机制分析

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2018.0161

植物生态学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 753-761.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0161

所属专题：植被生态学

华北地区胡桃楸林分布规律及群落构建机制分析

唐丽丽¹,张梅¹,赵香林¹,康慕谊^2,³,刘鸿雁⁴,高贤明⁵,杨彤¹,郑璞帆¹,石福臣^1,^*()

¹南开大学生命科学学院, 天津 300071
²北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875
³北京师范大学地理科学学部自然资源学院, 北京 100875
⁴北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京大学生态研究中心, 地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871
⁵中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点试验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2018-07-07 接受日期:2018-12-13 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2020-01-03
通讯作者: 石福臣
基金资助:
国家科技基础性工作专项(2011FY110300)

Species distribution and community assembly rules of Juglans mandshurica in North China

TANG Li-Li¹,ZHANG Mei¹,ZHAO Xiang-Lin¹,KANG Mu-Yi^2,³,LIU Hong-Yan⁴,GAO Xian-Ming⁵,YANG Tong¹,ZHENG Pu-Fan¹,SHI Fu-Chen^1,^*()

¹College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
²State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
³College of Resources Science & Technology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
⁴Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
⁵State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received:2018-07-07 Accepted:2018-12-13 Online:2019-09-20 Published:2020-01-03
Contact: SHI Fu-Chen
Supported by:
Supported by the National Basic Work of Science and Technology of China(2011FY110300)

1. 附录I 华北地区胡桃楸样方信息.pdf(302KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探究植物分布规律和群落构建机制是揭示植物群落空间分布、群落物种多样性的形成、发展及其影响因素的重要途径。该文以华北地区胡桃楸(Juglans mandshurica)林为研究对象, 基于野外84个样方的调查数据, 通过径级分析、典范对应分析等方法研究了胡桃楸林的空间分布规律, 并通过亲缘关系指数计算、植物功能性状等方法研究了胡桃楸林的物种共存机制。结果表明, 华北地区胡桃楸的胸径相对较小(平均5.36 cm), 种群年龄较低; 海拔、坡度、坡位和人为干扰程度是影响华北地区胡桃楸分布的主要因子。研究区域内的胡桃楸大部分生长于山体中下部海拔较低的缓坡, 且人为干扰相对较少的区域, 各分布区域中胡桃楸林的分布规律各异。胡桃楸林物种的构建由生态位机制主导, 其中河北、陕西、天津的胡桃楸林物种共存过程主要受负密度制约的影响, 北京、山西的胡桃楸林的物种共存过程主要受环境选择驱动。

关键词: 胡桃楸, 分布规律, 谱系发育, 群落构建机制, 植物群落

Abstract:

Aims Explore the distribution pattern and the processes controlling the assembly of the Juglans mandshurica dominated forests in North China.
Methods We investigated 84 plots, each with an area of 20 m × 30 m, for the J. mandshurica forests in the North China. We analyzed demography of the J. mandshurica based on its diameters, and applied canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) to explore the relationship between environment and species composition of different formations of the J. mandshurica forests. We then calculated phylogenetic index, i.e., net relatedness index (NRI) and nearest taxonomic index (NTI) and Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation (Gaussian KDE), for each plot to explore the rules controlling community assembly of these forests.
Important findings The population of J. mandshurica is relatively young in the Northern China, with a mean diameters at breast height (DBH) of 5.36 cm. Distribution of J. mandshurica in North China varied significantly with altitude, slope, slope position and human disturbance. Most of the J. mandshurica located at the low part of the massif with lower altitude and less human disturbance. In North China, niche related processes regulated species coexistence of Form. J. mandshurica, with competition controlled the community assembly in Hebei, Shaanxi and Tianjin, while environment filtering dominated in Beijing and Shanxi.

Key words: Juglans mandshurica, distribution pattern, phylogeny, community assembly rules, plant community

唐丽丽, 张梅, 赵香林, 康慕谊, 刘鸿雁, 高贤明, 杨彤, 郑璞帆, 石福臣. 华北地区胡桃楸林分布规律及群落构建机制分析. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 753-761. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0161

TANG Li-Li, ZHANG Mei, ZHAO Xiang-Lin, KANG Mu-Yi, LIU Hong-Yan, GAO Xian-Ming, YANG Tong, ZHENG Pu-Fan, SHI Fu-Chen. Species distribution and community assembly rules of Juglans mandshurica in North China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2019, 43(9): 753-761. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0161

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2018.0161

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2019/V43/I9/753

图/表 7

图1 华北地区胡桃楸样地分布。

Fig. 1 Sampling sites of Juglans mandshurica in North China.

表1 华北地区各地核桃楸种群密度及各径级胡桃楸数量

Table 1 Juglans mandshurica’s population density and the numbers of each diameter classes in North China

径级 Diameter classes (cm )	天津 Tianjin	北京 Beijing	河北 Hebei	山西 Shanxi	河南 Henan	陕西 Shaanxi
1-3	109	12	17	7	11	18
3-5	58	38	110	44	1	3
5-7	90	30	0	46	1	1
7-9	104	10	0	22	0	1
9-11	56	5	0	2	0	3
11-13	11	5	0	1	0	0
13-15	5	0	0	0	0	3
15-17	0	0	0	0	0	2
>17	1	0	0	0	0	0
种群密度 Population density (ind.·km^-2)	14	25	53	23	6	9

图2 华北地区胡桃楸胸径分级及其数量。

Fig. 2 Diameter classification and quantity of Juglans mandshurica in North China.

表2 华北地区胡桃楸分布与环境因子在前四排序轴上的相关系数

Table 2 Correlation coefficients between distribution of Juglans mandshurica and environmental factors at the first fourth canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination axes in North China

环境因子 Environmental factor	CCA排序轴
环境因子 Environmental factor	CCA 1	CCA 2	CCA 3	CCA 4
海拔 Elevation	-0.95^***	-0.06	-0.27^*	-0.02
坡度 Slop	0.57^***	-0.54^***	-0.39^***	0.28^*
坡向 Aspect	0.13	0.30	0.57^***	-0.49^***
坡位 Slop position	0.45^**	-0.48^***	-0.37^***	-0.64^***
人为干扰 Disturbance	-0.17^**	-0.65^***	0.68^***	-0.23
特征值 Eigenvalue	0.59^***	0.31^***	0.28^***	0.20^***
累计贡献率 Cumulative proportion	39.08%	59.52%	77.93%	91.39%

图3 华北地区胡桃楸分布与环境因子典范对应分析(CCA)的二维排序图。Ele, 海拔; Asp, 坡向; Slo, 坡度; Slp, 坡位; Dis, 人为干扰。´, 北京; °, 天津; ·, 河北; , 河南; +, 山西; -, 陕西。

Fig. 3 Two-dimensional ordination diagram of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) between distribution of Juglans mandshurica and environmental factors in North China. Ele, elevation; Asp, aspect; Slo, slope; Slp, slop position; Dis, disturbance. ´, Beijing; °, Tianjin; ·, Hebei; , Henan; +, Shanxi; -, Shaanxi.

表3 5个省市净亲缘关系指数(NRI)、最近亲缘关系指数(NTI)在正负范围内的面积

Table 3 Positive and negative area under curve of the net relatedness index (NRI) and net nearest taxa index (NTI) in five provinces

		北京 Beijing	河北 Hebei	山西 Shanxi	陕西 Shaanxi	天津 Tianjin
NRI	<0	0.72	0.08	-	0.00	0.26
NRI	>0	0.28	0.92	-	1.00	0.74
NTI	<0	0.86	0.08	-	0.00	0.20
NTI	>0	0.13	0.92	-	1.00	0.80

图4 亲缘关系指数高斯核密度估计曲线。NRI, 净亲缘关系指数; NTI, 最近亲缘关系指数.

Fig. 4 Results of Gaussian kernel density estimation of phylogenetic index. NRI, net relatedness index; NTI, nearest taxonomic index.

参考文献 47

[1]	Bai XH, Zhang JT, Cao K, Wang YQ, Sadia S, Cao G ( 2017). Relationship between forest communities and the environment in the Xiaowutai Mountain National Nature Reserve, Hebei. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 3683-3696.
	[ 白晓航, 张金屯, 曹科, 王云泉, Sehrish Sadia, 曹格 ( 2017). 河北小五台山国家级自然保护区森林群落与环境的关系. 生态学报, 37, 3683-3696.]
[2]	Bazzaz FA ( 1991). Habitat selection in plants. The American Naturalist, 137, S116-S130.
[3]	Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR ( 2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717-745.
[4]	Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW ( 2009). The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecology Letters, 12, 693-715.
[5]	Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T ( 2000). Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science, 288, 1414-1418.
[6]	Condit R, Engelbrecht BMJ, Pino D, Pérez R, Turner BL ( 2013). Species distributions in response to individual soil nutrients and seasonal drought across a community of tropical trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 5064-5068.
[7]	Connell JH, Tracey JG, Webb LJ ( 1984). Compensatory recruitment, growth, and mortality as factors maintaining rain forest tree diversity. Ecological Monographs, 54, 141-164.
[8]	D’Amen M, Rahbek C, Zimmermann NE, Guisan A ( 2017). Spatial predictions at the community level: From current approaches to future frameworks. Biological Reviews, 92, 169-187.
[9]	Diamond JM ( 1975). Assembly of Species Communities. Harvard University Press, Boston. 342-344.
[10]	Fang JY, Wang XP, Shen ZH, Tang ZY, He JS, Yu D, Jiang Y, Wang ZH, Zheng CY, Zhu JL, Guo ZD ( 2009). Methods and protocols for plant community inventory. Biodiversity Science, 17, 533-548.
	[ 方精云, 王襄平, 沈泽昊, 唐志尧, 贺金生, 于丹, 江源, 王志恒, 郑成洋, 朱江玲, 郭兆迪 ( 2009). 植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范. 生物多样性, 17, 533-548.]
[11]	Gao ZY, Zhang HF, Chen GP, Feng XM, Zhao TJ, Gao X, Shi FC ( 2017). Fruit stone morphology and geographic variation in Juglans mandshurica populations. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 23, 609-615.
	[ 高张莹, 张海峰, 陈国平, 冯小梅, 赵铁建, 高鑫, 石福臣 ( 2017). 核桃楸种群果核形态及地理变异. 应用与环境生物学报, 23, 609-615.]
[12]	Gilbert GS, Foster RB, Hubbell SP ( 1994). Density and distance‌-‌to-adult effects of a canker disease of trees in a moist tropical forest. Oecologia, 98, 100-108.
[13]	Hubbell SP ( 1980). Seed predation and the coexistence of tree species in tropical forests. Oikos, 35, 214-229.
[14]	Hubbell SP ( 2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[15]	Hyatt LA, Rosenberg MS, Howard TG, Bole G, Fang W, Anastasia J, Brown K, Grella R, Hinman K, Kurdziel JP, Gurevitch J ( 2003). The distance dependence prediction of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: A meta-analysis. Oikos, 103, 590-602.
[16]	Jari O, Blanchet FG, Roeland K, Pierre L, Peter RM, O’Hara RB, Gavin LS, Peter S, Stevens MHH, Helene W ( 2016). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version: 2.4-1.
[17]	Jones HG ( 2013). Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[18]	Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO ( 2010). Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics, 26, 1463-1464.
[19]	Kraft NJB, Cornwell WK, Webb CO, Ackerly DD ( 2007). Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. The American Naturalist, 170, 271-283.
[20]	Kraft NJB, Valencia R, Ackerly DD ( 2008). Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science, 322, 580-582.
[21]	Liang SJ, Pan P, Sun ZH, Wang QC ( 2005). Influence of slope on the growth of Fraxinus mandshurica Rup. and Juglans manshurica Maxim. plantations. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 33(3), 18-19.
	[ 梁淑娟, 潘攀, 孙志虎, 王庆成 ( 2005). 坡位对水曲柳及胡桃楸生长的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 33(3), 18-19.]
[22]	Ma KP ( 2016). Hot topics for biodiversity science. Biodiversity Science, 24, 1-2.
	[ 马克平 ( 2016). 生物多样性科学的热点问题. 生物多样性, 24, 1-2.]
[23]	Ma WL, Jing T, Kujansuu J, Luo JC, Sun B, Wang GF ( 2001). The dynamics of seed rain and seed bank of Juglans mandshurica population in the Changbai Mountain. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 23(3), 70-72.
	[ 马万里, 荆涛, Kujansuu J, 罗菊春, 孙波, 王广发 ( 2001). 长白山地区胡桃楸种群的种子雨和种子库动态. 北京林业大学学报, 23(3), 70-72.]
[24]	Ma WL, Luo JC, Jing T, Kujansuu J ( 2005). Ecological studies and prospect of cultivation on Juglans mandshurica population. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 34, 489-492.
	[ 马万里, 罗菊春, 荆涛, Kujansuu J ( 2005). 珍贵树种核桃楸的生态学问题及培育前景. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版), 34, 489-492.]
[25]	Ma WL, Luo JC, Jing T, Kujansuu J ( 2008). Study on dynamics of Juglans mandshurica population from Changbai Mountain. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 28, 249-253.
	[ 马万里, 罗菊春, 荆涛, Kujansuu J ( 2008). 长白山林区核桃楸种群数量动态变化的研究. 植物研究, 28, 249-253.]
[26]	McPeek MA ( 2007). The macroevolutionary consequences of ecological differences among species. Palaeontology, 50, 111-129.
[27]	Paradis E, Schliep K ( 201P). ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R.Bioinformatics, 35, 526-528.
[28]	Song NQ, Zhang JT, Zhao FG ( 2017). The PCA index for measuring functional diversity and its application to Juglans mandshurica communities in the Beijing mountains, China. International Journal of Biomathematics, 10, 1750097. DOI: 10.1142/S1793524517500978.
[29]	Su JJ, Wang XC ( 2017). Spatio-temporal variations in climate-‌growth relationships of three hardwood tree species across the north Zhangguangcai Mountains, northeast China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 1484-1495.
	[ 苏金娟, 王晓春 ( 2017). 张广才岭北部三大硬阔树木生长-气候关系的时空变异. 生态学报, 37, 1484-1495.]
[30]	Swenson NG ( 2011). The role of evolutionary processes in producing biodiversity patterns, and the interrelationships between taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic biodiversity. American Journal of Botany, 98, 472-480.
[31]	Tang LL, Chen GP, Feng XM, Zhao TJ, Shi FC ( 2017). Community assembly rules of the east of Yanshan Mountain based on phylogeny. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 37, 807-815.
	[ 唐丽丽, 陈国平, 冯小梅, 赵铁建, 石福臣 ( 2017). 基于系统发育的燕山东麓植物群落的构建机制. 植物研究, 37, 807-815.]
[32]	Vamosi SM, Heard SB, Vamosi JC, Webb CO ( 2009). Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Molecular Ecology, 18, 572-592.
[33]	Wang DL ( 2014). The Research on the Interspecies Allelopathic Effect of Juglans mandshurica and Larix gmelinii Forest Plantation. Master degree dissertation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin.
	[ 王东亮 ( 2014). 胡桃楸-落叶松林地种间化感效应的研究. 硕士学位论文, 东北林业大学, 哈尔滨.]
[34]	Wang DN, Mu CC, Gao Z, Feng FJ ( 2011). ISSR analysis of genetic diversity of Juglans mandshurica Maxim. populations. Nonwood Forest Research, 29(2), 22-29.
	[ 王东娜, 牟长城, 高卓, 冯福娟 ( 2011). 胡桃楸天然种群遗传多样性的ISSR分析. 经济林研究, 29(2), 22-29.]
[35]	Wang JW ( 2006). A Study on the Historical Change of Foreset\Grassland and Eco-catastrophes in North China. PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing.
	[ 王建文 ( 2006). 中国北方地区森林、草原变迁和生态灾害的历史研究. 博士学位论文, 北京林业大学, 北京.]
[36]	Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW ( 2008). Phylocom: Software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics, 24, 2098-2100.
[37]	Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ ( 2002). Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 475-505.
[38]	Webb CO, Donoghue MJ ( 2005). Phylomatic: Tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 181-183.
[39]	Weiher E, Keddy P ( 1999). Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[40]	Wickham H ( 2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York.
[41]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R ( 2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum . Nature, 428, 821-827.
[42]	Wright SJ ( 2002). Plant diversity in tropical forests: A review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia, 130, 1-14.
[43]	Yan N, Chen T, Chen YL, Wu XL, Wu LJ, Dawa CM, Basang DJ, Xu JY ( 2014). Characteristics of population structure Juglans mandshurica from the Wuling Mountain Nature Reserve. Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 35(6), 64-67, 81.
	[ 闫娜, 陈彤, 陈云丽, 吴晓丽, 吴丽娟, 达瓦措姆, 巴桑多吉, 徐建英 ( 2014). 雾灵山自然保护区胡桃楸种群结构特征分析. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 35(6), 64-67, 81.]
[44]	Yu M, Zhou ZY, Kang FF, Ouyang S, Mi XC, Sun JX ( 2013). Gradient analysis and environmental interpretation of understory herb-layer communities in Xiaoshegou of Lingkong Mountain, Shanxi, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 373-383.
	[ 余敏, 周志勇, 康峰峰, 欧阳帅, 米湘成, 孙建新 ( 2013). 山西灵空山小蛇沟林下草本层植物群落梯度分析及环境解释. 植物生态学报, 37, 373-383.]
[45]	Zeileis A, Grothendieck G ( 2005). Zoo: S3 infrastructure for regular and irregular time series. Journal of Statistical Software, 14, 1-27.
[46]	Zhao GY, Tian XJ, Wu ZH ( 1991). Analysis and discussion on the north distributing limitation of amur corktree, manchurian walnut and manchurian ash. Journal of Northest Forestry University, 19(Suppl. 1), 290-295.
	[ 赵光仪, 田兴军, 吴振河 ( 1991). 黄波罗、胡桃楸、水曲柳分布北限论析. 东北林业大学学报, 19(Suppl. 1), 290-295.]
[47]	Zhu Y, Mi XC, Ma KP ( 2009). A mechanism of plant species coexistence: The negative density-dependent hypothesis. Biodiversity Science, 17, 594-604.
	[ 祝燕, 米湘成, 马克平 ( 2009). 植物群落物种共存机制: 负密度制约假说. 生物多样性, 17, 594-604.]

华北地区胡桃楸林分布规律及群落构建机制分析

Species distribution and community assembly rules of Juglans mandshurica in North China

全文

PDF (PC)

附录附件

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	董劭琼, 侯东杰, 曲孝云, 郭柯. 柴达木盆地植物群落样方数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 534-540.
[2]	刘聪聪, 何念鹏, 李颖, 张佳慧, 闫镤, 王若梦, 王瑞丽. 宏观生态学中的植物功能性状研究: 历史与发展趋势[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 21-40.
[3]	肖兰, 董标, 张琳婷, 邓传远, 李霞, 姜德刚, 林勇明. 渤海无居民海岛主要植被类型群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 127-134.
[4]	李冰, 朱湾湾, 韩翠, 余海龙, 黄菊莹. 降水量变化下荒漠草原土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1310-1321.
[5]	白悦, 刘晨, 黄月, 董亚楠, 王露. 科尔沁沙质草地植物群落高度空间异质性对不同放牧方式的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(4): 394-404.
[6]	朱芩, 宁盼, 侯琳, 郝家田, 胡云云. 三江源地区刺柏属植物群落类型特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(1): 114-122.
[7]	张欢, 张云玲, 张彦才, 阎平. 新疆奇台荒漠类草地自然保护区主要植物群落及其特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 918-924.
[8]	朱湾湾, 王攀, 许艺馨, 李春环, 余海龙, 黄菊莹. 降水量变化与氮添加下荒漠草原土壤酶活性及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3): 309-320.
[9]	贺露炎, 侯满福, 唐伟, 刘雨婷, 赵俊. 滇东菌子山喀斯特森林的植被类型及其特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1380-1390.
[10]	于燕妹, 黄林娟, 薛跃规. 广西大石围天坑群不同植物群落的特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(1): 96-103.
[11]	郭柯, 方精云, 王国宏, 唐志尧, 谢宗强, 沈泽昊, 王仁卿, 强胜, 梁存柱, 达良俊, 于丹. 中国植被分类系统修订方案[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(2): 111-127.
[12]	方精云, 郭柯, 王国宏, 唐志尧, 谢宗强, 沈泽昊, 王仁卿, 强胜, 梁存柱, 达良俊, 于丹. 《中国植被志》的植被分类系统、植被类型划分及编排体系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(2): 96-110.
[13]	唐丽丽, 杨彤, 刘鸿雁, 康慕谊, 王仁卿, 张峰, 高贤明, 岳明, 张梅, 郑璞帆, 石福臣. 华北地区荆条灌丛分布及物种多样性空间分异规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 825-833.
[14]	刘璐, 葛结林, 舒化伟, 赵常明, 徐文婷, 申国珍, 谢宗强. 神农架常绿落叶阔叶混交林碳氮磷化学计量比[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(6): 482-489.
[15]	樊海东, 陈海燕, 吴雁南, 刘建峰, 徐德宇, 曹嘉瑜, 袁泉, 谭斌, 刘晓彤, 徐佳, 王国敏, 韩文娟, 刘立斌, 倪健. 金华北山南坡主要植被类型的群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(10): 921-928.