植物生态学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 781-790.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00781
杨帆1,2, 曹德昌1,2, 杨学军1, 高瑞如1,2, 黄振英1,*()
收稿日期:
2012-03-09
接受日期:
2012-04-30
出版日期:
2012-03-09
发布日期:
2012-08-21
通讯作者:
黄振英
作者简介:
* (E-mail: zhenying@ibcas.ac.cn)
YANG Fan1,2, CAO De-Chang1,2, YANG Xue-Jun1, GAO Rui-Ru1,2, HUANG Zhen-Ying1,*()
Received:
2012-03-09
Accepted:
2012-04-30
Online:
2012-03-09
Published:
2012-08-21
Contact:
HUANG Zhen-Ying
摘要:
角果碱蓬(Suaeda corniculata)是藜科一年生盐生植物, 在我国分布于北方盐碱滩涂和盐碱荒漠地区。角果碱蓬具有棕色和黑色两种异型体种子(简称棕色和黑色种子)。对采自内蒙古鄂托克前旗盐渍化生境的角果碱蓬二型种子的形态、休眠和萌发特性开展对比研究, 测定了二型种子休眠和萌发行为对温度、光照和盐分(NaCl)的响应, 以揭示盐生植物异型种子对温带盐漠生境的适应对策。结果表明: (1)二型性种子在大小、种皮特性和结实比例方面有显著差异。与黑色种子相比, 棕色种子个体较大, 种皮透水性强。黑色种子与棕色种子的结实比例约为5.6 : 1。(2)新成熟的棕色种子的萌发对各温度梯度和光照条件不敏感, 萌发率较高(84%-100%); 而新成熟的黑色种子萌发率较低(8%-78%), 萌发对光照敏感。(3)黑色种子具有浅度生理休眠, 种皮划破、赤霉素处理和低温层积均可有效地提高种子的萌发率。(4)二型种子萌发对土壤盐分的胁迫具有不同的响应。与黑色种子相比, 棕色种子对盐分胁迫不敏感, 在较高的盐分浓度下仍有较高的萌发率, 低温层积处理能够降低黑色种子对盐胁迫的敏感性, 有效地提高种子的初始萌发率、萌发恢复率和最终萌发率。角果碱蓬二型种子不同的形态、休眠和萌发特性, 提高了该物种在高度异质性生境中的适合度, 对种群成功地适应温带盐漠环境具有重要的意义。
杨帆, 曹德昌, 杨学军, 高瑞如, 黄振英. 盐生植物角果碱蓬种子二型性对环境的适应策略. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 781-790. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00781
YANG Fan, CAO De-Chang, YANG Xue-Jun, GAO Rui-Ru, HUANG Zhen-Ying. Adaptive strategies of dimorphic seeds of the desert halophyte Suaeda corniculata in saline habitat. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(8): 781-790. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00781
月份 Month | 1月 Jan. | 2月 Feb. | 3月 Mar. | 4月 Apr. | 5月 May | 6月 Jun. | 7月 Jul. | 8月 Aug. | 9月 Sept. | 10月 Oct. | 11月 Nov. | 12月 Dec. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最高气温 Maximum air temperature | -0.4 | 4.3 | 10.6 | 18.2 | 23.8 | 28.2 | 29.6 | 27.6 | 22.6 | 16.2 | 8.6 | 1.5 |
最低气温 Minimum air temperature | -16.4 | -11.8 | -4.3 | 2.7 | 9.0 | 13.8 | 16.5 | 14.8 | 9.0 | 1.4 | -6.8 | -14.1 |
表1 1991-2009年角果碱蓬生境各月份平均最高、最低气温(℃)
Table 1 Mean minimum and maximum air temperatures in habitat of Suaeda corniculata from 1991 to 2009 (°C)
月份 Month | 1月 Jan. | 2月 Feb. | 3月 Mar. | 4月 Apr. | 5月 May | 6月 Jun. | 7月 Jul. | 8月 Aug. | 9月 Sept. | 10月 Oct. | 11月 Nov. | 12月 Dec. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最高气温 Maximum air temperature | -0.4 | 4.3 | 10.6 | 18.2 | 23.8 | 28.2 | 29.6 | 27.6 | 22.6 | 16.2 | 8.6 | 1.5 |
最低气温 Minimum air temperature | -16.4 | -11.8 | -4.3 | 2.7 | 9.0 | 13.8 | 16.5 | 14.8 | 9.0 | 1.4 | -6.8 | -14.1 |
图1 2010年生长季角果碱蓬生境平均气温、降水量和土壤中可溶性盐的动态变化(平均值±标准误差)。
Fig. 1 Dynamics of mean air temperature, precipitation and soluble salt content of soil in habitat of Suaeda corniculata during growing season in 2010 (mean ± SE).
种子类型 Seed type | 种皮特征 Testa characteristics | 种子直径 Seed diameter (mm) | 千粒重 Mass of 1000 seeds (mg) | 黑色种子数:棕色种子数 Ratio of black seed to brown seed |
---|---|---|---|---|
棕色种子 Brown seed | 膜质, 柔软, 无光泽 Membranous, soft and lusterless | 1.07 ± 0.10a | 315.78 ± 1.75a | 5.60 ± 0.91 |
黑色种子 Black seed | 角质, 硬脆, 有光泽 Keratose, hard, brittle and glossy | 0.95 ± 0.08b | 240.35 ± 3.86b |
表2 角果碱蓬二型种子形态特征、千粒重、数量比例(平均值±标准误差)
Table 2 Morphological characteristics, mass of 1000 seeds and seed ratio of dimorphic seeds of Suaeda corniculata (mean ± SE)
种子类型 Seed type | 种皮特征 Testa characteristics | 种子直径 Seed diameter (mm) | 千粒重 Mass of 1000 seeds (mg) | 黑色种子数:棕色种子数 Ratio of black seed to brown seed |
---|---|---|---|---|
棕色种子 Brown seed | 膜质, 柔软, 无光泽 Membranous, soft and lusterless | 1.07 ± 0.10a | 315.78 ± 1.75a | 5.60 ± 0.91 |
黑色种子 Black seed | 角质, 硬脆, 有光泽 Keratose, hard, brittle and glossy | 0.95 ± 0.08b | 240.35 ± 3.86b |
图2 20-25 ℃气温、45%-50%相对湿度下角果碱蓬二型种子吸水曲线(平均值±标准误差)。G, 萌发时间点。
Fig. 2 Imbibition curves for dimorphic seeds of Suaeda corniculata at 20-25 °C air temperature and 45%-50% relative humidity (mean ± SE). G, germination time point.
图3 温度和光照对新成熟的角果碱蓬二型种子萌发率的影响(平均值±标准误差)。不同的大写字母表示同一类型的种子在相同光照条件、不同温度处理之间的萌发率差异显著; 不同的小写字母表示同一类型种子在相同温度、不同光照处理之间的萌发率差异显著(5%水平)。
Fig. 3 Effects of light and temperature on the germination of freshly matured dimorphic seeds of Suaeda corniculata (mean ± SE). Different capital letters indicate significant differences in germination of the same seed type among different temperatures under the same light condition, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in germination of the same seed type among different light conditions with the same temperature (5% level).
图4 20-25 ℃气温、45%-50%相对湿度下种皮处理(A)和 赤霉素(GA3)处理(B)对角果碱蓬黑色种子萌发率的影响(平均值±标准误差)。不同的小写字母表示各个GA3浓度处理下的种子萌发率差异显著(5%水平)。
Fig. 4 Effect of testa treatment (A) and GA3 treatment (B) on germination of black seed of Suaeda corniculata at 20-25 °C and 45%-50% relative humidity (mean ± SE). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences across all concentrations of GA3 (5% level).
图5 经过0-8周低温层积的角果碱蓬黑色种子在不同温度、光照或黑暗条件下的萌发率(平均值±标准误差)。不同的大写字母表示在相同的光照和低温层积时间, 不同温度处理之间的萌发率差异显著; 不同的小写字母表示相同温度和光照条件下, 不同的低温层积时间处理之间的萌发率差异显著(5%水平)。
Fig. 5 Germination of black seed of Suaeda corniculata at different temperatures in light or darkness after 0-8 weeks of cold stratification (mean ± SE). Different capital letters indicate significant differences in germination among different temperatures under the same light condition and cold stratification time, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in germination among different cold stratification time under the same temperature and light condition (5% level).
盐度 Salinity (mol·L-1) | 初始萌发率 Initial germination (%, mean ± SE) | 萌发恢复率 Germination recovery percentage (%, mean ± SE) | 最终萌发率 Final germination (%, mean ± SE) | 有生活力的种子 Viable seed (%, mean ± SE) | 有生活力但未萌发的种子 Viable ungerminated seed (%, mean ± SE) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新成熟的黑色种子 Freshly matured black seed | 0.0 | 58 ± 2a | 0c | 58 ± 2a | 100a | 42 ± 2c |
0.1 | 16 ± 2b | 7 ± 3b | 22 ± 4bc | 100a | 78 ± 4ab | |
0.2 | 2 ± 2c | 7 ± 2b | 9 ± 2c | 100a | 91 ± 2a | |
0.5 | 1 ± 1c | 27 ± 3a | 28 ± 3b | 100a | 72 ± 3b | |
0.8 | 0c | 20 ± 2ab | 20 ± 2bc | 100a | 80 ± 2ab | |
1.0 | 0c | 32 ± 8a | 32 ± 8b | 100a | 68 ± 8b | |
8周低温层积的黑色种子 Black seed after 8 weeks cold stratification | 0.0 | 95 ± 3a | 0c | 95 ± 3a | 100a | 5 ± 3b |
0.1 | 42 ± 11b | 0c | 42 ± 11b | 100a | 58 ± 11a | |
0.2 | 33 ± 5bc | 10 ± 3b | 40 ± 3b | 100a | 60 ± 3a | |
0.5 | 15 ± 6cd | 37 ± 10a | 45 ± 12b | 100a | 55 ± 12a | |
0.8 | 0d | 24 ±3ab | 24 ± 3b | 100a | 76 ± 3a | |
1.0 | 0d | 33 ± 5a | 33 ± 5b | 100a | 67 ± 5a | |
新成熟的棕色种子 Freshly matured brown seed | 0.0 | 100a | -- | 100a | 100a | 0b |
0.1 | 100a | -- | 100a | 100a | 0b | |
0.2 | 100a | -- | 100a | 100a | 0b | |
0.5 | 76 ± 7b | 96 ± 23a | 98 ± 1a | 100a | 1 ± 1b | |
0.8 | 42 ± 4c | 93 ± 1a | 96 ± 1b | 100a | 4 ± 1a | |
1.0 | 12 ± 2d | 92 ± 2a | 93 ± 2b | 100a | 7 ± 2a |
表3 NaCl对角果碱蓬二型种子萌发和恢复萌发率的影响
Table 3 Effect of NaCl on germination and germination recovery of dimorphic seeds of Suaeda corniculata
盐度 Salinity (mol·L-1) | 初始萌发率 Initial germination (%, mean ± SE) | 萌发恢复率 Germination recovery percentage (%, mean ± SE) | 最终萌发率 Final germination (%, mean ± SE) | 有生活力的种子 Viable seed (%, mean ± SE) | 有生活力但未萌发的种子 Viable ungerminated seed (%, mean ± SE) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新成熟的黑色种子 Freshly matured black seed | 0.0 | 58 ± 2a | 0c | 58 ± 2a | 100a | 42 ± 2c |
0.1 | 16 ± 2b | 7 ± 3b | 22 ± 4bc | 100a | 78 ± 4ab | |
0.2 | 2 ± 2c | 7 ± 2b | 9 ± 2c | 100a | 91 ± 2a | |
0.5 | 1 ± 1c | 27 ± 3a | 28 ± 3b | 100a | 72 ± 3b | |
0.8 | 0c | 20 ± 2ab | 20 ± 2bc | 100a | 80 ± 2ab | |
1.0 | 0c | 32 ± 8a | 32 ± 8b | 100a | 68 ± 8b | |
8周低温层积的黑色种子 Black seed after 8 weeks cold stratification | 0.0 | 95 ± 3a | 0c | 95 ± 3a | 100a | 5 ± 3b |
0.1 | 42 ± 11b | 0c | 42 ± 11b | 100a | 58 ± 11a | |
0.2 | 33 ± 5bc | 10 ± 3b | 40 ± 3b | 100a | 60 ± 3a | |
0.5 | 15 ± 6cd | 37 ± 10a | 45 ± 12b | 100a | 55 ± 12a | |
0.8 | 0d | 24 ±3ab | 24 ± 3b | 100a | 76 ± 3a | |
1.0 | 0d | 33 ± 5a | 33 ± 5b | 100a | 67 ± 5a | |
新成熟的棕色种子 Freshly matured brown seed | 0.0 | 100a | -- | 100a | 100a | 0b |
0.1 | 100a | -- | 100a | 100a | 0b | |
0.2 | 100a | -- | 100a | 100a | 0b | |
0.5 | 76 ± 7b | 96 ± 23a | 98 ± 1a | 100a | 1 ± 1b | |
0.8 | 42 ± 4c | 93 ± 1a | 96 ± 1b | 100a | 4 ± 1a | |
1.0 | 12 ± 2d | 92 ± 2a | 93 ± 2b | 100a | 7 ± 2a |
[1] | Bao SD (鲍士旦) (2000). Soil Agriculture and Chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[2] | Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998). Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego. |
[3] | Chen MZ (陈明忠), Sun K (孙坤), Zhang ML (张明理), Pang HL (庞海龙), Li JX (李金霞) (2011). Comparative study on micro-morphological characteristics of seed coat of fourteen species in Chenopodiaceae from China. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment (植物资源与环境学报), 20, 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | de Clavijo ER (2005). The reproductive strategies of the heterocarpic annual Calendula arvensis (Asteraceae). Acta Oecologica, 28, 119-126. |
[5] | Gutterman Y (1993). Seed Germination in Desert Plants. Springer-Verlag, New York. |
[6] | Gutterman Y (2002). Survival Strategies of Annual Desert Plants. Springer, Berlin. |
[7] | Harper JL, Lovell PH, Moore KG (1970). The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 327-356. |
[8] | Imbert E (2002). Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 5, 13-36. |
[9] | Khan MA, Gul B, Weber DJ (2001). Germination of dimorphic seeds of Suaeda moquinii under high salinity stress. Australian Journal of Botany, 49, 185-192. |
[10] | Kong XW (孔宪武), Jian ZP (简焯坡) (1979). Flora of China (中国植物志). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[11] | Lev-Yadun S (2000). Why are underground flowering and fruiting more common in Israel than anywhere else in the world? Current Science, 79, 289. |
[12] | Li L (李利), Yang XL (杨小林), Wang WH (王伟华) (2007). Response of germination of dimorphic seeds of Bors- zczowiz aralocaspica to habitat conditions. Arid Zone Research (干旱区研究), 24, 830-834. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Liu PW (刘鹏伟), Wei Y (魏岩) (2007). Seed dimorphism and germination behavior of Atriplex micrantha, an annual inhabiting Junggar desert. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 4233-4239. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Liu YF (刘艳芳), Wei Y (魏岩), Yan C (严成) (2009). Germination characteristics and ecological adaptation of dimorphic seeds of Borszczowia aralocaspica. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 6609-6614. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Lomonosova M, Brandt R, Freitag H (2008). Suaeda corniculata (Chenopodiaceae) and related new taxa from Eurasia. Willdenowia, 38, 81-109. |
[16] | Lu JM (陆静梅), Li JD (李建东) (2007). The anatomical study in Suaedac corniculata (C. A. M.) Bunge. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition) (东北师范大学学报 (自然科学版)), 23, 104-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Ma YQ (马毓泉) (1979). Flora of Inner Mongolia (内蒙古植物志). Inner Mongolia University Press, Hohhot. (in Chinese) |
[18] |
Mandák B, Pyšek P (2001a). The effects of light quality, nitrate concentration and presence of bracteoles on germination of different fruit types in the heterocarpous Atriplex sagittata. Journal of Ecology, 89, 149-158.
DOI URL |
[19] | Mandák B, Pyšek P (2001b). Fruit dispersal and seed banks in Atriplex sagittata: the role of heterocarpy. Journal of Ecology, 89, 159-165. |
[20] | Mayer AM, Poljakoff-Mayer A (1989). The Germination of Seeds 4th edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford. |
[21] | Mcevoy PB (1984). Dormancy and dispersal in dimorphic achenes of tansy ragwort, Senecio jacobaea L. (Compositae). Oecologia, 61, 160-168. |
[22] | Qu XX (渠晓霞), Huang ZY (黄振英) (2005). The adaptive strategies of halophyte seed germination. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 2389-2398. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Sorensen AE (1978). Somatic polymorphism and seed dispersal. Nature, 276, 174-176. |
[24] | Ungar IA (1987). Population ecology of halophyte seeds. The Botanical Review, 53, 301-334. |
[25] | Venable DL (1985). The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism. The American Naturalist, 126, 577-595. |
[26] | Venable DL (2007). Bet hedging in a guild of desert annuals. Ecology, 88, 1086-1090. |
[27] | Venable DL, Burquez A (1990). Quantitative genetics of size, shape, life-history, and fruit characteristics of the seed heteromorphic composite Heterosperma pinnatum. II. Correlation structure. Evolution, 44, 1748-1763. |
[28] | Wang L (王雷), Dong M (董鸣), Huang ZY (黄振英) (2010). Review of research on seed heteromorphism and its ecological significance. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34, 578-590. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | Wang L, Huang ZY, Baskin CC, Baskin JM, Dong M (2008). Germination of dimorphic seeds of the desert annual halophyte Suaeda aralocaspica (Chenopodiaceae), a C4 plant without Kranz anatomy. Annals of Botany, 102, 757-769. |
[30] | Wei Y, Dong M, Huang ZY (2007). Seed polymorphism, dormancy and germination of Salsola affinis (Chenopodiaceae), a dominant desert annual inhabiting the Junggar Basin of Xinjiang, China. Australian Journal of Botany, 55, 464-470. |
[31] | Wei Y, Dong M, Huang ZY, Tan DY (2008). Factors influencing seed germination of Salsola affinis (Chenop-odiaceae), a dominant annual halophyte inhabiting the deserts of Xinjiang, China. Flora, 203, 134-140. |
[32] | Yao SX, Lan HY, Zhang FC (2010). Variation of seed heteromorphism in Chenopodium album and the effect of salinity stress on the descendants. Annals of Botany, 105, 1015-1025. |
[1] | 李文博 孙龙 娄虎 于澄 韩宇 胡同欣. 火干扰对兴安落叶松种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 袁涵 钟爱文 刘送平 徐磊 彭焱松. 水毛花种子萌发特性的差异及休眠解除方法[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 638-650. |
[3] | 李绍阳, 马红媛, 赵丹丹, 马梦谣, 亓雯雯. 火烧信号对种子萌发影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(11): 1177-1190. |
[4] | 艾沙江•阿不都沙拉木, 迪丽娜尔•阿布拉, 张凯, 买热也木古•吐尔逊, 卡迪尔•阿布都热西提, 李玲. 喀什霸王的结实和种子萌发特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5): 437-446. |
[5] | 吴小琪, 杨圣贺, 黄力, 李笑寒, 杨超, 钱深华, 杨永川. 常绿阔叶林林冠环境对栲幼苗建成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 55-64. |
[6] | 雍艳华, 张霞, 王绍明, 吴玲. 新疆典型盐生植物营养器官盐分积累与生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12): 1267-1275. |
[7] | 刘波, 吕宪国, 姜明, 张文广, 武海涛. 光照、水深交互作用对松嫩湿地芦苇种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(6): 616-620. |
[8] | 李晓娟, 王强, 倪穗, 阮晓, 王永红, 张焕, 王高峰. 栗与美国板栗化感作用的比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(2): 173-182. |
[9] | 陈志颖, 阮晓, 张玉竹, 潘存德, 王强. 3,4-二羟基苯乙酮胁迫对天山云杉种子萌发过程中内源植物激素含量变化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(12): 1114-1122. |
[10] | 王雷, 董鸣, 黄振英. 种子异型植物异子蓬的生殖分配和结实格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(9): 948-955. |
[11] | 刘会良, 张永宽, 张道远, 尹林克, 张元明. 不同居群准噶尔无叶豆果实和种子特性及种子萌发差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 802-811. |
[12] | 王桔红, 马瑞君, 陈文. 冷层积和室温干燥贮藏对河西走廊8种荒漠植物种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 791-801. |
[13] | 张敏, 朱教君, 闫巧玲. 光对种子萌发的影响机理研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 899-908. |
[14] | 胡小文, 王娟, 王彦荣. 野豌豆属4种植物种子萌发的积温模型分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 841-848. |
[15] | 张飞, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 丁建丽, 买买提·沙吾提, 桂东伟. 塔里木河中游绿洲盐漠带典型盐生植物光谱特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(7): 607-617. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19