适度高温下亚热带阔叶树种叶片的光合速率和吸收光能的分配

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用光合作用测定系统(Li-COR 6400和叶室荧光仪),测定了亚热带阔叶树种的光合速率和荧光参数,分析了38 ℃适度高温对叶片光合作用和吸收光能分配的影响。测试树种包括华南亚热带地区常见的阳生性树种木荷(Schima superba)、耐荫树种黄果厚壳桂(Cryptocarya concinna)和中生性树种红锥(Castanopsis hystrix)。适度高温处理均引起所有树种的光合能力下降,而且木荷和红锥下降的程度比黄果厚壳桂明显。与25 ℃的对照温度相比,适度高温处理的木荷叶片用于光化学反应所消耗的光能下降,红锥和黄果厚壳桂也有相似的反应,表明适度高温限制叶片用于光化学反应的吸收光能。无论哪个树种,38 ℃适度高温处理的植物,叶片总吸收光能中额外多余的那部分和处于非活化状态PSⅡ所吸收的那部分光能都增加,而且黄果厚壳桂比木荷和红锥显著,因此,亚热带阔叶森林的树种对适度高温的响应因种类而异。研究结果意味着将来气候变化导致温度的上升对演替后期树种黄果厚壳桂的光合过程的限制比演替早期的树种木荷和中生性树种红锥会更严重。

关键词: 光合作用, 叶绿素荧光参数, 适度高温, 亚热带阔叶树种

Abstract:

Aims This study aimed at better understanding the physiological mechanisms involved in the moderately high temperature treatment, particularly those relating to partitioning of absorbed light energy in some dominant tree species of low subtropical broad-leaf forest in South China, which would affect vegetation succession.
Methods Two-year old saplings of three tree species, Schima superba, Castanopsis hystrix and Cryptocarya concinna, which represent different successional stages in subtropical broad-leaf forest were treated with moderately high temperature (38 ℃). Their photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured using a photosynthesis measurement system (Li-COR 6400 and leaf chamber fluorometer) in order to evaluate the effects of moderately high temperature on photosynthesis and partitioning of absorbed light energy under subsequent irradiance.
Important findings Exposure to moderately high temperature caused decrease of photosynthetic capacity of all experimented tree species under the subsequent irradiance, and such decrease was more obvious in sun plant, S. superba and mesophytic plant, C. hystrix than in shade-adapted plant, C. concinna. The fraction of energy consumed by photochemical reaction decreased in the exposed leaves of S. superba, in comparison with those in control at 25 ℃, and a similar response was also found in C. hystrix and C. concinna. The results showed that moderately high temperature could restrict the fraction of absorbed energy utilized in photochemical reaction in leaves treated with moderately high temperature under the subsequent irradiance. The portion of total absorbed light energy that was excessive and the fraction of energy absorbed by the inactive PSⅡ also increased in the exposed leaves at 38 ℃ irrespective of species difference, and the increments were more remarkable in C. concinna than in C. hystrix and S. superba. Different responses to moderately high temperature were dependent on tree species in subtropical broad-leaf forest. The results may mean that the increase of ambient temperature by changing climate would more severely restrict photosynthetic process in the late-successional species, C. concinnia than in the early- or mesophytic species, S. superb and C. hystrix.

Key words: photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, moderately high temperature, tree species of subtropical broad-leaf forest

赵平, 孙谷畴, 曾小平. 适度高温下亚热带阔叶树种叶片的光合速率和吸收光能的分配. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 413-423. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.020

ZHAO Ping, SUN Gu-Chou, ZENG Xiao-Ping. PHOTOSYNTHETIC RATES AND PARTITIONING OF ABSORBED LIGHT ENERGY IN LEAVES OF SUBTROPICAL BROAD-LEAF TREES UNDER MODERATELY HIGH-TEMPERATURE. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(2): 413-423. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.020

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.020

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2008/V32/I2/413

图/表 5

Fig.1 Light response curves of net photosynthetic rate in moderately high temperature exposed and in control leaves The curves were obtained under CO2 concentration of 365 μmol·mol-1 at 25 ℃

Fig.2 Light response of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of ΔF/Fm' (circle), Fv'/Fm' (square) and qP (triangle) in leaves under ambient temperature (25 ℃) (a, c and e) and moderately high-temperature (38 ℃) exposition (b, d and f)

Fig.3 Partitioning of the absorbed light energy in control leaves (a, c and e) and moderately high-temperature acclimatized leaves (b, d and f) E (circle), Dl (square), Dd (triangle) and B (diamond) denote the allocation of absorbed energy to excess, heat dissipation in height, loss in dark, photochemical reaction a, b: Schima superba c, d: Castanopsis hystrix e, f: Cryptocarya concinna

Fig.4 Several schematic representations displaying portion of total absorbed photon energy that was excessive (E), the energy lost in active PSⅡ in the light (Dl), the energy lost in active PS Ⅱ in the dark (Dd), the energy utilized by photochemical reaction in the leaves (C) and fraction of energy absorbed by inactive PSⅡ (B) The figure represents the related proportion of individual fraction of those five components of energy to amount of absorbed energy integrated over the entire regime of irradiance from 0 to 1 500 μmol photon·m-2·s-1

Fig.5 Photo flux density response of estimated rates of photochemical reaction and heat dissipation (a, c and e), NPQ and qN (b, d and f) in moderately high temperature exposed leaves (open symbols) and control leaves (closed symbols) of Schima superba, Castanopsis hystrix and Cryptocarya concimma The different symbols represent estimated rate of photochemical reaction (circles) and energy loss in active PSⅡ (squares), NPQ (triangles) and qN (diamonds)

参考文献 21

[1]	Aro EM, McCaffery S, Aderson JA (1993). Photoinhibition and DI protein degradation in pear acclimated to different growth irradiance. Plant Physiology, 103, 835-847.
[2]	Berry JA, Bjørkman O (1980). Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 31, 491-543.
[3]	Bjørkman O, Demmig B (1987). Photon yield of O₂ evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77k among vascular planta of diverse origins. Planta, 170, 489-504. URL PMID
[4]	Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvncci ME (2000). Rubisco activase constrain the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO₂. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United State of America, 97, 13430-13435.
[5]	Demmig-Adams B, Admas WW, Barker DH, Logan BA, Bowling DB, Verhoever AS (1996). Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiologia Plantarum, 98, 253-264.
[6]	Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW (1992). Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 43, 599-626.
[7]	Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989). The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 990, 87-92.
[8]	Gilmore AM (1997). Mechanistic aspects of xanthophyl cycle-dependent photoprotection in higher plant chloroplast and leaves. Physiologia Plantarum, 99, 197-209.
[9]	Habaux M, Tardy F, Ravenel J, Chanu D, Purot P (1996). Thylakoid membrane stability to heat stress by flash spectroscopic measurement of the electrochromic shift in intact potato leaves: influence of xanthophylls content. Plant, Cell and Environment, 19, 1359-1368.
[10]	Haldimann P, Feller U (2004). Inhibition of photosynthesis by high temperature in oak (Quercus pubescens L.) leaves grown under natural conditions closely correlates with a reversible heat-dependent reduction of the activation state of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 1169-1183.
[11]	Hikosaka K, Kato MC, Hirose T (2004). Photosynthetic rates and partitioning of absorbed light energy in photoinhibition leaves. Physiologia Plantarum, 121, 699-708.
[12]	Kato MC, Hikosaka K, Hirotsu N, Makino A, Hirose T (2003). The excess light energy that is neither utilized in photosynthesis nor dissipated by photoprotective mechanisms the rate of photo inactivation in photosystem Ⅱ. Plant Cell Physiology, 44, 318-325.
[13]	Kornyeyer D, Holaday AS, Logan BA (2004). Minimization of the photon energy absorbed by “closed” reaction centers of photosystem Ⅱ as a photoprotective strategy in higher plants. Photosynthetica, 42, 377-386.
[14]	Krause GH (1988). Photoinhibition of photosynthesis, an evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiologia Plantarum, 74, 566-574.
[15]	Krall JP, Edwards GE (1992). Relationship between photosystem Ⅱ activity and CO₂ fixation in leaves. Physiologia Plantarum, 86, 180-187.
[16]	Larcher W (2001). Ökophysiologie der Pflanzen. Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, 74-166.
[17]	Qin DH (秦大河) (2003). Fact, impact, adaptation and mitigation strategy of climate change. Bulletin of National Science Foundation of China (中国科学基金), 17, 1-3. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Osmond CB (1994). What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants. In: Bake NR, Rowyer JR eds. Photoinhibitin of Photosynthesis From Molecular Mechanism to the Field. Bioscientific Publishers, Oxford, 1-24.
[19]	Schreiber O, Bilger W, Nubauer C (1995). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a non-intrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. In: Schulze ED, Caldwell MM eds. Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 49-70.
[20]	Schrader SM, Wise RR, Wacholtz WF, Ort DR, Sharkey TE (2004). Thylakoid membrane responses to moderately high leaf temperature in Pima Cotton. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 725-735.
[21]	von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981). Some relationship between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387.