植物生态学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 706-718.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.009
所属专题: 生态系统碳水能量通量
刘晨峰1, 张志强1,*(), 孙阁2, 查同刚1, 朱金兆1, 申李华1, 陈军1, 方显瑞1, 陈吉泉3
收稿日期:
2008-04-11
修回日期:
2009-03-23
出版日期:
2009-04-11
发布日期:
2009-07-30
通讯作者:
张志强
作者简介:
*(zhqzhang@bjfu.edu.cn)基金资助:
LIU Chen-Feng1, ZHANG Zhi-Qiang1,*(), SUN Ge2, ZHA Tong-Gang1, ZHU Jin-Zhao1, SHEN Li-Hua1, CHEN Jun1, FANG Xian-Rui1, CHEN Ji-Quan3
Received:
2008-04-11
Revised:
2009-03-23
Online:
2009-04-11
Published:
2009-07-30
Contact:
ZHANG Zhi-Qiang
摘要:
运用涡度相关(Eddy covariance)开路系统、树干液流(Sap flow)、土壤水分以及微气象观测系统, 于2006年生长季(5~10月)对北京大兴区永定河沿河沙地杨树(Populus euramericana)人工林生态系统的水量和能量平衡进行了连续测定; 分析了该系统能量平衡闭合水平及其组分分配特征, 不同水分条件下蒸发散及其各组分变化过程和分配特征, 以及影响蒸发散的主要环境因子; 并对组分求和法、土壤水分平衡法与涡度相关法测得该生态系统生长季蒸发散总量的结果进行了对比。结果表明: 生长季内该生态系统的能量闭合水平较高, 能量平衡各组分在不同土壤水分环境条件下所占比例变化较大; 在水分充足的条件下, 潜热通量在可利用能量分配过程中占优势, 显热通量在水分胁迫条件下占可提供能量的比例比潜热通量大。雨季到来之前, 土壤蒸发与植被蒸腾强度相差较小; 进入雨季后, 土壤深层水分得到补偿, 植被蒸腾显著增强而土壤蒸发强度减弱。涡度相关法所得的总蒸发散量与基于树干液流法等组分求和法得到的蒸发散结果较接近, 分别为513和492 mm。土壤水分平衡法的观测结果略高于前二者的观测结果, 雨季研究界面以下的土体也有水分交换是该方法高估蒸发散的主要原因。与环境因子的响应关系表明, 蒸发散以及蒸腾的变化过程对净辐射的响应程度比对饱和水汽压差高; 水分条件较好情况下, 蒸发散以及蒸腾的变化过程与水汽压差关系不明显, 说明水分充足时, 水汽压差不是蒸散强弱的限制因子。
刘晨峰, 张志强, 孙阁, 查同刚, 朱金兆, 申李华, 陈军, 方显瑞, 陈吉泉. 基于涡度相关法和树干液流法评价杨树人工林 生态系统蒸发散及其环境响应. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 706-718. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.009
LIU Chen-Feng, ZHANG Zhi-Qiang, SUN Ge, ZHA Tong-Gang, ZHU Jin-Zhao, SHEN Li-Hua, CHEN Jun, FANG Xian-Rui, CHEN Ji-Quan. QUANTIFYING EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND BIOPHYSICAL REGULATIONS OF A POPLAR PLANTATION ASSESSED BY EDDY COVARIANCE AND SAP-FLOW METHODS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(4): 706-718. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.009
图1 2006年1~12月经质量控制后的数据每日能量闭合情况 LE: Latent heat H: Sensible heat Rn: Net radiation G: Soil heat flux
Fig. 1 Daily energy balance closure using the quality controlled data from January to December in 2006 for the Daxing site
图3 2006年生长季能量平衡各组分不同水分条件下分配 Rn, LE, H, G: 同图1 See Fig. 1
Fig. 3 Energy balance and its components under different water conditions during the growing season of 2006 (a) dry days and (b) wet days
图4 2006年生长季内组分之和法与涡度相关法所测蒸发散过程
Fig. 4 Daily ecosystem ET estimated by eddy covariance and components-base approaches during 2006 ET: Evapotranspiration T: Temperature Es: Soil evaporation Ei: Interception evaporation
图7 2006年生长季内涡度相关法测定的蒸发散和树干液流法对蒸腾的评估在林分/小时尺度上的相关关系
Fig. 7 Relationship between hourly sap flow estimates of transpiration (T) and eddy covariance estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) during growing season of 2006
图8 2006年生长季内对降雨, 基于土壤水分平衡法的实际蒸发散, 基于涡度相关法的实际蒸发散 ET, T, Es, Ei: 同图4 See Fig. 4
Fig. 8 The independent annual estimates of precipitation, actual evaportranspiration (AET) derived from soil water budget and EC methods in 2006 Ir: Irrigation EC: Eddy covariance
图9 2006年生长季内不同的水分环境条件下涡度相关法和树干液流法在日尺度上的观测结果和气压差/净辐射的响应关系
Fig. 9 Reponses of transpiration (T) and Evapotranspiration (ET) measured by sap flow and eddy covariance to the atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD), (a) and (b) for net radiation (Rn), (c) and (d) under different water input during the growing season of 2006
[1] |
Baker NJ (1991). A possible role for photosystem II in environmental perturbations of photosynjournal. Physiologia Plantarum, 81, 563-570.
DOI URL |
[2] |
Downton WJS, Loveys BR, Grant WJR (1988). Non-uniform stomatal closure induced by water stress cause putative non-stomatal inhibition of photosynjournal. New Phytology, 110, 503-509.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Eagleson PS (1978). Climate, soil, and vegetation- introduction to water balance dynamics. Water Resources Research, 14, 705-712.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Falge E, Baldocchi DD, Olson R, Anthoni P, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Dolman H, Granier A, Gross P, Grunwald T, Hollinger D, Jensen NO, Katul G, Keronen P, Kowalski A, Lai CT, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Moors E, Munger JW, Pilegaard K, Rannik U, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001a). Gap filling strategies for long term energy flux data sets. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107, 71-77.
DOI URL |
[5] |
Falge E, Baldocchi DD, Olson R, Anthoni P, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Dolman H, Granier A, Gross P, Grunwald T, Hollinger D, Jensen NO, Katul G, Keronen P, Kowalski A, Lai CT, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Moors E, Munger JW, Pilegaard K, Rannik U, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001b). Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107, 43-69.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Ferretti DF, Pendal E, Morgan JA, Nelson JA, Cain DL, Mosier AR (2003). Partitioning evapotranspiration fluxes from a Colorado grassland using stable isotopes: seasonal variations and ecosystem implications of elevated atmospheric CO2. Plant and Soil, 254, 291-303.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Foken T, Wichura B (1996). Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 78, 83-105.
DOI URL |
[8] | Gao Y (高岩), Zhang RM (张汝民), Liu J (刘静) (2001). A study on volume and velocity of stem sap flow of popular’s by heat-pulse technique. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 21, 644-649. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] |
Grainer A (1987). Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology, 3, 309-320.
DOI URL PMID |
[10] |
Hatton TJ, Catchpole EA, Vertessy RA (1990). Integration of sapflow velocity to estimate plant water use. Tree Physiology, 6, 201-209.
DOI URL PMID |
[11] |
Hatton TJ, Vertessy RA (1990). Transpiration of plantation Pinus radiata estimated by the heat pulse method and the bowen ratio. Hydrological Processes, 4, 289-298.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Hollinger DY, Aber J, Dail B, Davidson EA, Goltz SM, Hughes H, Leclerc MY, Lee JT, Richardson AD, Rodrigues C, Scott NA, Achuatavarier D, Walsh J (2004). Spatial and temporal variability in forest-atmosphere CO2 exchange. Global Change Biology, 10, 1689-1706.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Lagergren F, Lindroth A (2004). Variation in sapflow and stem growth in relation to tree size, competition and thinning in a mixed forest of pine and spruce in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 188, 51-63.
DOI URL |
[14] |
Law BE, Falge E, Gu L, Baldocchi DD, Bakwin P, Berbigier P, Davis K, Dolman AJ, Falk M, Fuentes JD, Goldstein A, Granier A, Grelle A, Hollinger D, Janssens IA, Jarvis P, Jensen NO, Katul G, Mahli Y, Matteucci G, Meyers T, Monson R, Munger W, Oechel W, Olson R, Pilegaard K, Paw UKT, Thorgeirsson H, Valentini R, Verma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2002). Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 97-120.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Lee X, Black TA, Gerryden H, Harold HN, Zoran N, Janusz O (1996). Carbon dioxide exchange and nocturnal processes over a mixed deciduous forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 81, 13-29.
DOI URL |
[16] | Li HT (李海涛), Chen LZ (陈灵芝) (1998). A study on the volume and velocity of stem sapflow of Betula dahurica and Acer mono forests by the heat pulse technique. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 20, 1-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Liu CF (刘晨峰), Zhang ZQ (张志强), Zha TG (查同刚), Sun G (孙阁), Chen JQ (陈吉泉), Zhu JZ (朱金兆), Shen LH (申李华), Zhang JL (张津林), Chen J (陈军), Cui LJ (崔令军) (2006). Soil moisture statues effects on the energy allocation and diurnal evapotranspiration of a Poplar plantation ecosystem on sandy soil as measured by Eddy-Covariance method. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 8, 2549-2557. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Liu CF (刘晨峰) (2007). Energy and Water budget of a Poplar Plantation in Suburban Beijing (北京地区杨树人工林能量和水量平衡研究). PhD dissertation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing, 35-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Liu FJ (刘奉觉), Edwards WRN, Zheng SK (郑世锴), Ju GS (巨关升), Wang GJ (王广举), Lu YN (卢永农) (1993). A study on the dynamics of sap flow in space and time in poplar stems. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 6, 368-372. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Liu FJ (刘奉觉) Edwards WRN (1997). A study on comparison of measuring water consumption for transpiration in poplar. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 33, 117-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Liu YN (刘雅妮), Wu JJ (武建军), Xia H (夏虹), Fan JL (范锦龙) (2005). Summary of two-layer models on estimating evapotranspiration using quantitative parameters derived from remote sensing. Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 28(1), 65-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] |
Lundblad M, Lindroth A (2002). Stand transpiration and sapflow density in relation to weather, soil moisture and stand characteristics. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3, 229-243.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Mahrt L (1998). Flux sampling errors for aircraft and towers. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15, 416-429.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Massman WJ, Lee X (2002). Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 121-144.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Milly PCD (1994). Climate,interseasonal storage of soil water,and the annual water balance. Water Resources Research, 30, 2143-2156.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Olivier R, Jean MB, Mark Ir, Paul B, Yann N, Jean D, Serge T, Olivier H, Christophe J, Laurent SA, Isabelle MS, Jean PL, Daniel E, Richard J, Serge B, Andre R, Muriel N, Jean PB (2006). Partitioning energy and evapotranspiration above and below a tropical palm canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 139, 252-268.
DOI URL |
[27] | Ruan BH (阮宏华), Zheng AB (郑阿宝), Zhong YQ (钟育谦) (1999). A study on the transpiration intensity and total transpiration calculation of the secondary Oak forest. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition)(南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)), 23(4), 32-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Song X (宋霞), Liu YF (刘允芬), Xu XF (许小锋) (2003). Study on the comparison of chamber technique and eddy covariance in measuring carbon flux. Jiangxi Science (江西科学), 21, 206-210. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | Song X (宋霞), Liu YF (刘允芬), Xu XF (许小锋), Yu GR (于贵瑞), Wen XF (温学发) (2004). Comparison study on carbon dioxide, water and heat flux of the forest ecosystem in red earth hilly zone over winter and spring. Resource Science (资源科学), 26(3), 96-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | Sun PS (孙鹏森) (2000). Layout and Different Scale Water Use Characteristic of Water Conservation Tree Species in North Beijing Mountain Area (京北水源保护林格局及不同尺度树种蒸腾耗水特性研究). PhD dissertation,Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] |
Thomas WG, Alan DZ, Michael AN, Dao MT, Liem TT (2003). Transpiration in a small tropical forest patch. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 117, 1-22.
DOI URL |
[32] | Wang LX (王礼先), Zhang ZQ (张志强) (1998). Advances in the study of ecohydrological effects from vegetation changes. World Forestry Research (世界林业研究), 6, 14-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] |
Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980). Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 106, 85-106.
DOI URL |
[34] |
Williams DG, Cable W, Hultine K, Hoedjes JCB, Yepez EA, Simonneaux V, Er-Raki S, Boulet G, Bruin HAR, Chehbouni A, Hartogensis OK, Timouk F (2004). Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotope, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 125, 241-258.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Wilson KB, Hanson PJ, Mulholland PJ, Baldocchi DD, Wullschleger SD (2001). A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 106, 153-168.
DOI URL |
[36] |
Wilson KB, Allen G, Eva F, Marc A, Dennis B, Paul B, Christian B, Reinhart C, Han D, Chris F, Achim G, Andreas I, Law BE, Andy K, Tilden M, John M, Russ M, Walter O, John T, Riccardo V, Shashi V (2002). Energy balance closure at fluxnet sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 223-243.
DOI URL |
[37] | Wu JB (吴家兵), Guan DX (关德新), Zhang M (张弥) (2005). Comparison of eddy covariance and BREB methods in determining forest evapotranspiration—Case study on broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 24, 1245-1249. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[38] |
Zhang ZQ (张志强), Wang LX (王礼先), Yu XX (余新晓) Klaghofer E (2001). Impacts of forest vegetation on runoff generation mechanisms: a review. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 16(1), 79-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[1] | 杨尚锦, 范云翔, 章毓文, 韩巧玲, 赵玥, 段劼, 邸楠, 席本野. 树木夜间液流组分划分方法对比——以毛白杨为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 496-507. |
[2] | 韩聪, 母艳梅, 查天山, 秦树高, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕. 2012-2016年宁夏盐池毛乌素沙地黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统通量观测数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1322-1332. |
[3] | 范云翔, 邸楠, 刘洋, 章毓文, 段劼, 李新, 王海红, 席本野. 毛白杨茎干夜间液流时空动态及其环境影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 262-274. |
[4] | 冯印成, 王云琦, 王玉杰, 王凯, 王松年, 王杰帅. 重庆缙云山针阔混交林水汽通量特征及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 890-903. |
[5] | 黄樱, 陈挚, 石喆, 熊博文, 鄢春华, 邱国玉. 蒸散发广义互补原理中关键参数αe的时空变化特征及计算方法分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 300-310. |
[6] | 王彦兵, 游翠海, 谭星儒, 陈波宇, 许梦真, 陈世苹. 中国北方干旱半干旱区草原生态系统能量平衡闭合的季节和年际变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1448-1460. |
[7] | 林雍, 陈智, 杨萌, 陈世苹, 高艳红, 刘冉, 郝彦宾, 辛晓平, 周莉, 于贵瑞. 中国干旱半干旱区生态系统光合参数的时空变异及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1461-1472. |
[8] | 李红琴, 张亚茹, 张法伟, 马文婧, 罗方林, 王春雨, 杨永胜, 张雷明, 李英年. 增强回归树模型在青藏高原高寒灌丛通量数据插补中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1437-1447. |
[9] | 赵文芹, 席本野, 刘金强, 刘洋, 邹松言, 宋午椰, 陈立欣. 不同灌溉条件下杨树人工林蒸腾过程及环境响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 370-382. |
[10] | 陈世苹, 游翠海, 胡中民, 陈智, 张雷明, 王秋凤. 涡度相关技术及其在陆地生态系统通量研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(4): 291-304. |
[11] | 何秋月, 闫美杰, 张建国, 杜盛. 黄土高原半湿润区刺槐树干液流对人工截留降雨输入及环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4): 466-474. |
[12] | 冯朝阳, 王鹤松, 孙建新. 中国北方植被水分利用效率的时间变化特征及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4): 453-465. |
[13] | 柴曦, 李英年, 段呈, 张涛, 宗宁, 石培礼, 何永涛, 张宪洲. 青藏高原高寒灌丛草甸和草原化草甸CO2通量动态及其限制因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(1): 6-19. |
[14] | 徐静馨, 郑有飞, 麦博儒, 赵辉, 储仲芳, 黄积庆, 袁月. 基于涡度相关法的麦田O3干沉降及不同沉降通道分配的特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(6): 670-682. |
[15] | 吴旭, 陈云明, 唐亚坤. 黄土丘陵区刺槐和侧柏人工林树干液流特征及其对降水的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(12): 1176-1187. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19