荒漠植物蒙古扁桃水分生理特征

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2007.0060

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

蒙古扁桃(Prunus mongolica)是荒漠区和荒漠草原的水土保持植物和景观植物,是蒙古高原古老残遗植物,对其深入研究对于了解蒙古高原植被演替以及对当地生态环境的稳定和恢复有着重要意义。该实验采用PV技术和自然脱水法探讨了蒙古扁桃的水分生理特性。结果表明:在自然状态下,蒙古扁桃幼苗叶片的相对含水量为69%,饱和含水量为117%,临界饱和亏为48%,水势为-0.85 MPa。经 5% PEG-Hoagland (-0.46 MPa)干旱胁迫处理3 d后,其相对含水量、临界含水量和水势分别下降到48%、39%和 -1.97 MPa,而饱和含水量和束缚水与自由水比值分别增加到187%和11.94。对失水率分析的结果表明:在正常水分状态下,蒙古扁桃幼苗经102 h自然脱水后失水达到平衡,而经过干旱胁迫处理3 d后,其失水率曲线斜率变小,失水过程明显减缓,失水最终达到平衡的时间延长到152 h,其保水能力显著提高。将旱生植物蒙古扁桃的失水率曲线与中旱生植物长柄扁桃(P. pedunculata)的失水率曲线相比较发现,蒙古扁桃的耐脱水能力明显强于中旱生植物长柄扁桃。PV曲线(Pressure-volume curve)分析结果表明: 蒙古扁桃饱和含水量渗透势(Ψπ¹⁰⁰)和零膨压渗透势 (Ψπ⁰)很低,分别为-2.49 MPa和-3.11 MPa,而Ψπ¹⁰⁰和Ψπ⁰差值较大(0.62 MPa),表明其维持膨压的能力很强。其细胞壁弹性模量值低(4.18 MPa)进一步表明,蒙古扁桃具有很强的膨压调节能力。蒙古扁桃幼苗失去膨压时的渗透含水量(ROWC^tlp)为80%,这是其细胞壁特性所决定的渗透调节能力的基础。蒙古扁桃质外体含水量(AWC, %)较高(79%),因而具有较高的束缚水与自由水比值(7.76),这是其耐脱水性的生理基础。总之,蒙古扁桃叶水势、渗透势低有利于其根部对深层土壤水分的吸收,而较高的束缚水与自由水比值及较低的细胞壁弹性模量是其耐脱水的生理基础。

关键词: 蒙古扁桃, 荒漠植物, 濒危植物, 水分生理

Abstract:

Aims Prunus mongolica is a xeric shrub, a landscape plant, a water and soil conservation plant, and an ancient species in the desert and desert steppe of the Mongolian Plateau, China. It tolerates extreme aridity and poor soil, growing strongly in desert where annual rainfall is <200 mm and annual evaporation is 3 400-4 000 mm. Study of P. mongolica is useful for understanding plant succession on the Mongolian Plateau and for sustaining and restoring the local ecosystem.
Methods The Abbe refractometer method, the natural dehydration method and the PV technique were used to analyze the hydrological characteristic of P. mongolica.
Important findings The relative water content, saturation water content, critical saturation deficit and water potential of P. mongolica seedling leaves were 69%, 117%, 48% and -0.85 MPa, respectively. The relative water content, critical water content and leaf water potential of P. mongolica seedlings exposed to drought stress decreased to 48%, 39% and -1.97 MPa, respectively, but the saturation water content and the ratio of bound water/free water increased to 187% and 11.94, respectively. The natural dehydration experiment indicated that P. mongolica seedlings reached equilibrium after 102 h in normal condition, but the dehydration rate decreased and the dehydration equilibrium time was delayed after 3 d of drought stress. This proved that the water-holding ability of P. mongolica increased after drought stress. In comparing the dehydration rates of the xerophytic P. mongolica and the mesophytic P. pedunculata, we discovered that the dehydration tolerance capacity of P. mongolica was higher than that of P. pedunculata. Analysis of PV curve showed that osmotic potential (Ψπ¹⁰⁰) of water saturation and osmotic potential (Ψπ⁰) at turgor loss point of P. mongolica seedling were -2.49 MPa and -3.11 MPa, respectively. The fact that the difference of Ψπ ¹⁰⁰ and Ψπ ⁰ was very large and the values very low showed that P. mongolica had strong ability to regulate turgor pressure. The ratio of bound water/free water was relatively high (7.76), and the modulus elasticity of cell wall was 4.18 MPa. The low leaf water potential and low osmotic potential of P. mongolica were beneficial for absorption of water from soil depths. Our results indicated that P. mongolica was a strong xerophyte in terms of hydrology. Its high ratio of bound water and free water, low osmotic potential at saturation water content, osmotic potential at turgor loss point and low modulus elasticity of cell wall were the physiological fundamentals of its dehydration tolerance.

Key words: Prunus mongolica, desert plant, endangered plant, hydrology

斯琴巴特尔, 秀敏. 荒漠植物蒙古扁桃水分生理特征. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 484-489. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0060

Siqinbateer , XIU Min. HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE DESERT PLANT PRUNUS MONGOLICA ON THE MONGOLIAN PLATEAU OF CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 484-489. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0060

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0060

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2007/V31/I3/484

图/表 5

参考文献 21

[1]	Beadle CL, Ludlow MM, Honeysett JL (1993). Water relations. In: Hall EO, Scurlock JMO, Bolhar-Norderkampf HR eds. Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment. A field and Laboratory Manual. Chapman & Hall, London, 113-128.
[2]	Cheung YNS, Tyree MT, Dainty J (1975). Water relations parameters on single leaves obtained in a pressure bomb and some ecological interpretations. Canadian Journal of Botany, 53, 1342-1346.
[3]	Dong XJ (董学军)(1998). Experimental measurement of the water relations parameters of nine shrubs and some ecological interpretations. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 40, 657-664. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Fu LG (傅立国) (1992). China Plant Red Data Book — Rare and Endangered Plants , Vol. 1. (中国植物红皮书——稀有濒危植物,第一册). Science Press, Beijing, 554. (in Chinese)
[5]	Feng JZ (冯金朝) (1995). Water characteristic curves and water relations of desert plants. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 15, 222-226. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Li AP (李爱平), Wang XJ (王晓江), Zhang JG (张纪钢), Yang M (杨明) (2004). Biological characteristics and eco-economic value of Prunus mongolica Maxim. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology (内蒙古林业科技), (1), 10-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Li HS (李合生)(2000). Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment (植物生理生化实验原理与技术). Higher Education Press, Beijing.
[8]	Li JY (李吉跃)(1989). The application of PV technique in research of drought resistance in Pinus tabuleformis and Platycladus orientalis seedlings. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 11(1), 3-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Li X (李骁), Wang YC (王迎春), Zheng R (征荣) (2005). Water parameters of xeric shrubs in West Erdos region (Ⅰ). Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 25, 581-586. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Liu MZ, Jiang GM, Li YG, Niu SL(2003). Leaf osmotic potential of 104 plant species in relation to habitats and plant functional types in Hunshandak Sandland, Inner Mongolia, China. Trees, 17, 554-560. DOI URL
[11]	Ma YQ (马毓泉) (1994). Flora Intramongolica , Vol. 3 2nd edn (内蒙古植物志, 3卷, 第二版). Inner Mongolia People Press, Huhhot, 180. (in Chinese)
[12]	Richard H (1981). Plant and Their Atmospheric Environment. Academic Press, New York, 263-272.
[13]	Tyree MT, Hammel HT (1972). The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. Journal of Experimental Botany, 23, 267-282.
[14]	Wang GG (王国光)(1994). Inner Mongolia Soil (内蒙古土壤). Science Press, Beijing, 51. (in Chinese)
[15]	Wang JH (王继和), Wu CR (吴春荣), Ma QL (马全林) (2000). Studies on eco-physiological characteristics of endangered plant Potaninia mongolica Maxim. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 20, 397-403. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Wang LD (王理德), Liu SL (刘生龙), Gao ZH (高志海), Zhong SJ (仲述军) (1995). An analysis on water physiological characteristics of five species of rare plant. Gansu Forestry Science and Technology (甘肃林业科技), (2), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Wang WL (王万里) (1984). The application of pressure chamber in studying plant water relations. Plant Physiology Communications (植物生理学通讯), (3), 52-57. (in Chinese)
[18]	Yu YJ (于云江), Shi PJ (史培军), Lu CX (鲁春霞), Liu JQ (刘家琼) (2003). Response of the eco-physiological characteristics of some plants under blown sand. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27, 53-58. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Zhang LJ (张力君), Wang LH (王林和), Yi J (易津) (2003). Analysis on water retention of 8 xerophyte shrubs including Ceratoides spp. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 17, 122-128. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Zhang XS (张新时) (1994). The ecological background of the Mu Us sand land and the principles and optimal models for grassland management. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 18, 1-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Zhao YZ (赵一之) (1995). Study on floristic geographical distribution of Amygdalus mongolica. Acta Scientiarium Universities Neimonggol (内蒙古大学学报), 26, 713-715. (in Chinese with English abstract)

测定项目Items	对照 Control	处理Treatment	测定项目Items	对照 Control	处理Treatment
含水量 Water content (%)	68.70±2.34	48.45±2.04^**	相对含水量 Relative water content (%)	85.80±5.63	53.58±2.87^**
自由水含量 Free water content (%)	29.44±1.15	3.74±0.11^**	饱和含水量 Saturation water content (%)	116.75±6.66	187.13±6.52^*
束缚水含量 Bound water content (%)	39.26±2.37	44.70±1.97^**	临界含水量 Critical water content (%)	51.88±3.24	38.78±1.73^*
束缚水/自由水 Bound water/free water	1.33±0.22	11.94±1.82^**	自然饱和亏 Saturation deficit (%)	14.20±1.36	46.42±3.58^**
水势 Water potential (MPa)	-0.85±0.29	-1.97±0.61^*	临界饱和亏 Critical saturation deficit(%)	48.12±2.96	61.22±5.37^*

测定项目Items	对照 Control	处理Treatment	测定项目Items	对照 Control	处理Treatment
含水量 Water content (%)	68.70±2.34	48.45±2.04^**	相对含水量 Relative water content (%)	85.80±5.63	53.58±2.87^**
自由水含量 Free water content (%)	29.44±1.15	3.74±0.11^**	饱和含水量 Saturation water content (%)	116.75±6.66	187.13±6.52^*
束缚水含量 Bound water content (%)	39.26±2.37	44.70±1.97^**	临界含水量 Critical water content (%)	51.88±3.24	38.78±1.73^*
束缚水/自由水 Bound water/free water	1.33±0.22	11.94±1.82^**	自然饱和亏 Saturation deficit (%)	14.20±1.36	46.42±3.58^**
水势 Water potential (MPa)	-0.85±0.29	-1.97±0.61^*	临界饱和亏 Critical saturation deficit(%)	48.12±2.96	61.22±5.37^*