植物生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 337-348.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0241
孙元丰1,2,万宏伟1,赵玉金1,陈世苹1,2,白永飞1,2,*()
出版日期:
2018-03-20
发布日期:
2018-03-08
通讯作者:
白永飞
基金资助:
Yuan-Feng SUN1,2,Hong-Wei WAN1,Yu-Jin ZHAO1,Shi-Ping CHEN1,2,Yong-Fei BAI1,2,*()
Online:
2018-03-20
Published:
2018-03-08
Contact:
Yong-Fei BAI
Supported by:
摘要:
根系周转是陆地生态系统物质循环的关键指标, 也是陆地生态系统净初级生产力及碳固持潜力估算的核心参数。然而, 由于地下净初级生产力数据获取困难, 区域和全球尺度上的相关研究十分有限, 尤其是分布广泛的中国草地, 区域尺度上的整合研究几乎为空白。基于样地实测数据、已发表文献和在线数据库数据, 对中国草地5种植被类型、共计154个草地生态系统根系周转的空间格局进行整合分析, 并结合气象和土壤数据, 揭示了草地生态系统根系周转的关键驱动因子。研究发现: (1)根系周转速率随纬度升高而降低, 低纬度温暖地区根系周转更快; (2)气候因子(年平均气温、年降水量)和土壤理化性质(砾石含量、容重、pH值)共同影响根系周转, 对周转变异性的解释度为44%, 其中气候因子的相对贡献率为57%, 土壤理化性质的相对贡献率为43%; (3)中国草地根系周转的格局和驱动因子与全球尺度的研究结果不尽相同。该研究对根系周转的驱动因子提出了新的观点和证据, 为全球尺度上的整合研究提供了关键数据。
孙元丰, 万宏伟, 赵玉金, 陈世苹, 白永飞. 中国草地生态系统根系周转的空间格局和驱动因子. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 337-348. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0241
Yuan-Feng SUN, Hong-Wei WAN, Yu-Jin ZHAO, Shi-Ping CHEN, Yong-Fei BAI. Spatial patterns and drivers of root turnover in grassland ecosystems in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(3): 337-348. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0241
图3 不同草地类型根系周转速率分布情况。矩形的上端和下端分别代表第四分位数和第一分位数, 横线代表中位数, 空心圆点代表均值, 实心点代表离散点。Alp, 高寒草甸; Ave, 平均值; Des, 荒漠草原; Mea, 草甸草原; Typ, 典型草原; Wtt, 热性草丛。
Fig. 3 Changes in root turnover rate among grassland types in China. The boxes show the 25% and 75% percentiles, and the lines, hollow dots and solid dots represent the mean, median and outlier (95% confidence interval) values, respectively. Alp, alpine meadow; Ave, average value; Des, desert steppe; Mea, meadow steppe; Typ, typical steppe; Wtt, warm-temperate tussock;.
图4 不同草地类型根系周转速率(平均值+标准误差)。不同小写字母表示类型间差异显著(p < 0.05)。Alp, 高寒草甸; Des, 荒漠草原; Mea, 草甸草原; Typ, 典型草原; Wtt, 热性草丛。
Fig. 4 Root turnover rate for different grassland types (mean + SE). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among grassland types (p < 0.05). Alp, alpine meadow; Des, desert steppe; Mea, meadow steppe; Typ, typical steppe; Wtt, warm-temperate tussock.
草地类型 Grassland type | 样本数 N | 平均值 Mean | 标准误差 SE |
---|---|---|---|
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow | 47 | 0.428 | 0.022 |
荒漠草原 Desert steppe | 14 | 0.360 | 0.063 |
草甸草原 Meadow steppe | 29 | 0.387 | 0.030 |
典型草原 Typical steppe | 57 | 0.246 | 0.019 |
热性草丛 Warm-temperate tussock | 7 | 0.782 | 0.077 |
表1 不同草地类型根系周转速率统计
Table 1 Statistics of root turnover rate in different grassland types
草地类型 Grassland type | 样本数 N | 平均值 Mean | 标准误差 SE |
---|---|---|---|
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow | 47 | 0.428 | 0.022 |
荒漠草原 Desert steppe | 14 | 0.360 | 0.063 |
草甸草原 Meadow steppe | 29 | 0.387 | 0.030 |
典型草原 Typical steppe | 57 | 0.246 | 0.019 |
热性草丛 Warm-temperate tussock | 7 | 0.782 | 0.077 |
图5 根系周转速率和年平均气温(MAT) (A)及平均年降水量(MAP) (B)之间的关系。
Fig. 5 Relationship between root turnover rate and mean annual temperature (MAT) (A) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) (B).
图6 根系周转速率和土壤砾石含量(A)、容重(B)、pH值(C)及阳离子交换量(D)之间的关系。
Fig. 6 Relationships between root turnover rate and soil gravel content (A), bulk density (B), pH value (C) and cation exchange capacity (CEC) (D).
气候因子 Climatic factor | 土壤理化性质 Soil properties | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAT | MAP | Gravel | BD | pH | CEC | |
MAP | 0.50*** | |||||
Gravel | 0.09 | 0.46*** | ||||
BD | 0.01 | -0.13 | -0.16 | |||
pH | 0.04 | -0.12 | -0.31*** | -0.17* | ||
CEC | 0.14 | 0.35*** | 0.11 | -0.76*** | 0.11 | |
RTR | 0.45*** | 0.46*** | 0.39*** | -0.33*** | -0.18* | 0.30*** |
表2 根系周转速率与气候因子和土壤理化性质之间的相关系数
Table 2 Correlation coefficients of the root turnover rate with climatic factors and soil properties
气候因子 Climatic factor | 土壤理化性质 Soil properties | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAT | MAP | Gravel | BD | pH | CEC | |
MAP | 0.50*** | |||||
Gravel | 0.09 | 0.46*** | ||||
BD | 0.01 | -0.13 | -0.16 | |||
pH | 0.04 | -0.12 | -0.31*** | -0.17* | ||
CEC | 0.14 | 0.35*** | 0.11 | -0.76*** | 0.11 | |
RTR | 0.45*** | 0.46*** | 0.39*** | -0.33*** | -0.18* | 0.30*** |
图9 气候和土壤因子对根系周转速率解释度的相对贡献。BD, 土壤容重(kg.dm-3); MAT, 年平均气温(℃); MAP, 平均年降水量(mm); Gravel, 土壤砾石含量(% vol.); pH, 酸碱性。
Fig. 9 The relative contributions of climatic variables and soil properties to root turnover rate. BD, bulk density (g.cm-3); MAT, mean annual temperature (℃); MAP, mean annual precipitation (mm); Gravel, gravel content (% vol.); pH, pH value.
[1] |
Aber JD, Melillo JM, Nadelhoffer KJ, McClaugherty CA, Pastor J ( 1985). Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability: A comparison of two methods. Oecologia, 66, 317-321.
DOI URL PMID |
[2] |
Allard V, Newton PCD, Lieffering M, Soussana JF, Carran RA, Matthew C ( 2005). Increased quantity and quality of coarse soil organic matter fraction at elevated CO2 in a grazed grassland are a consequence of enhanced root growth rate and turnover. Plant and Soil, 276, 49-60.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Bai WM, Wan SQ, Niu SL, Liu WX, Chen QS, Wang QB, Zhang WH, Han XG, Li LH ( 2010). Increased temperature and precipitation interact to affect root production, mortality, and turnover in a temperate steppe: Implications for ecosystem C cycling. Global Change Biology, 16, 1306-1316.
DOI URL |
[4] | Bai WM, Wang ZW, Chen QS, Zhang WH, Li LH ( 2008). Spatial and temporal effects of nitrogen addition on root life span of Leymus chinensis in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Functional Ecology, 22, 583-591. |
[5] |
Bai YF, Han XG, Wu JG, Chen ZZ, Li LH ( 2004). Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature, 431, 181-184.
DOI URL PMID |
[6] |
Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL ( 2000). Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests. Oecologia, 125, 389-399.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Chai X, Liang CZ, Liang MW, Han WH, Li ZY, Miao BL, Wang W, Wang LX ( 2014). Seasonal dynamics of belowground biomass and productivity and potential of carbon sequestration in meadow steppe and typical steppe, in Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 5530-5540.
DOI URL |
柴曦, 梁存柱, 梁茂伟, 韩伟华, 李智勇, 苗百岭, 王炜, 王立新 ( 2014). 内蒙古草甸草原与典型草原地下生物量与生产力季节动态及其碳库潜力. 生态学报, 34, 5530-5540.
DOI URL |
|
[8] |
Chen D, Lan Z, Bai X, Grace JB, Bai Y, van der Heijden M ( 2013). Evidence that acidification-induced declines in plant diversity and productivity are mediated by changes in below-ground communities and soil properties in a semi-arid steppe. Journal of Ecology, 101, 1322-1334.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Chen SH, Xie ZK, Wang YJ, Wei XH ( 2005). Moisture storage effect of gravel mulch with different grain size on watermelon field. Journal of Desert Research, 25, 433-436.
DOI URL |
陈士辉, 谢忠奎, 王亚军, 魏兴琥 ( 2005). 砂田西瓜不同粒径砂砾石覆盖的水分效应研究. 中国沙漠, 25, 433-436.
DOI URL |
|
[10] | Chen ZZ, Huang DH ( 1988). A measurement to underground productivity and turnover value of Aneurolepidium chinense and Stipa grandis grassland at Xilin River Valley, Inner Mongolia. In: Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station, Chinese Academy of Science eds. Research on Grassland Ecosystem, No. 2. Science Press, Beijing. 132-138. |
陈佐忠, 黄德华 ( 1988). 内蒙古锡林河流域羊草草原与大针茅草原地下部分生产力和周转值的研究. 见: 中国科学院内蒙草原生态系统研究站主编. 草原生态系统研究(II). 科学出版社, 北京. 132-138. | |
[11] |
Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, Chambers JQ, Thomlinson JR, Ni J, Holland EA ( 2001). Net primary production in tropical forests: An evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecological Applications, 11, 371-384.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Curtin D, Beare MH, Hernandez-Ramirez G ( 2012). Temperature and moisture effects on microbial biomass and soil organic matter mineralization. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76, 2055-2067.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Dahlman RC, Kucera CL ( 1965). Root productivity and turnover in native prairie. Ecology, 46, 84-89.
DOI URL |
[14] |
de Bello F, Dolezal J, Ricotta C, Klimesova J ( 2011). Plant clonal traits, coexistence and turnover in East Ladakh, Trans-Himalaya. Preslia, 83, 315-327.
DOI URL |
[15] | Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, General Station of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary of Ministry of Agriculture of China ( 1996). Rangeland Resources of China. China Science and Technology Press, Beijing. |
中华人民共和国农业部畜牧兽医司, 全国畜牧兽医总站 ( 1996). 中国草地资源. 中国科学技术出版社, 北京. | |
[16] |
Edwards EJ, David GB, Louise AM, Alastair HF ( 2004). Root production is determined by radiation flux in a temperate grassland community. Global Change Biology, 10, 209-227.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD ( 2000). Building roots in a changing environment: Implications for root longevity. New Phytologist, 147, 33-42.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD ( 1997). The ecology of root lifespan. Advances in Ecological Research, 27, 1-60.
DOI URL |
[19] | Feng YF ( 1990). Estimates of belowground biomass and turnover of Stipa klemenzii shrub desert steppe in Inner Mongolia. In: Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station, Chinese Academy of Science ed. Research on Grassland Ecosystem, No. 2. Science Press, Beijing. 27-31. |
冯雨峰 ( 1990). 内蒙古灌丛化石生针茅荒漠草原地下生物量与周转值的测定. 见: 中国科学院内蒙草原生态系统研究站主编. 草原生态系统研究(II). 科学出版社, 北京. 27-31. | |
[20] |
Fitter AH, Graves JD, Wolfenden J, Self GK, Brown TK, Bogie D, Mansfield T ( 1997). Root production and turnover and carbon budgets of two contrasting grasslands under ambient and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. New Phytologist, 137, 247-255.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Gao YZ, Jing X, Wang XY ( 2017). Impact of grazing and clipping on grassland belowground net primary productivity and root turnover. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition), 43(2), 111-117.
DOI URL |
高英志, 景馨, 王新宇 ( 2017). 放牧和刈割对草原地下净生产力和根系周转的影响. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 43(2), 111-117.
DOI URL |
|
[22] |
Gill RA, Jackson RB ( 2000). Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 147, 13-31.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Gupta SR, Singh JS ( 1982). Influence of floristic composition on the net primary production and dry matter turnover in a tropical grassland. Australian Journal of Ecology, 7, 363-374.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Hayes DC, Seastedt TR ( 1987). Root dynamics of tallgrass prairie in wet and dry years. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65, 787-791.
DOI URL |
[25] |
He JS, Wang ZQ, Fang JY ( 2004). Issues and prospects of belowground ecology with special reference to global climate change. Chinese Science Bulletin, 49, 1226-1233.
DOI URL |
贺金生, 王政权, 方精云 ( 2004). 全球变化下的地下生态学: 问题与展望. 科学通报, 49, 1226-1233.
DOI URL |
|
[26] |
Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED ( 1997). A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7362-7366.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Jiang L, Geng ZC, Li SS, She D, He XS, Zhang Q, Liang C, Liu XD, Jing WM, Wang SL ( 2012). Soil cation exchange capacity and exchangeable base cation content in the profiles of four typical soils in the Xishui Forest Zone of the Qilian Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 3368-3377.
DOI URL |
姜林, 耿增超, 李珊珊, 佘雕, 何绪生, 张强, 梁策, 刘贤德, 敬文茂, 王顺利 ( 2012). 祁连山西水林区土壤阳离子交换量及盐基离子的剖面分布. 生态学报, 32, 3368-3377.
DOI URL |
|
[28] | Jiang S, Qi QH, Kong DZ ( 1985). The primary research about biomass of the Aneurolepidium chinense and Stipa grandis grassland community. In: Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station, Chinese Academy of Science ed. Research on Grassland Ecosystem, No. 1. Science Press, Beijing. 12-22. |
姜恕, 戚秋慧, 孔德珍 ( 1985). 羊草草原群落和大叶针茅草原群落生物量的初步比较研究. 见: 中国科学院内蒙草原生态系统研究站主编. 草原生态系统研究(I). 科学出版社, 北京. 12-22. | |
[29] |
Kosmas CS, Danalatos NG ( 1993). The impacts of parent material and landscape poison on drought and biomass production of wheat under semiarid conditions. Soil Technology, 6, 337-349.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Larreguy C, Carrera AL, Bertiller MB ( 2012). Production and turnover rates of shallow fine roots in rangelands of the Patagonian Monte, Argentina. Ecological Research, 27, 61-68.
DOI URL |
[31] |
Leifeld J, Bassin S, Conen F, Hajdas I, Egli M, Fuhrer J ( 2013). Control of soil pH on turnover of belowground organic matter in subalpine grassland. Biogeochemistry, 112, 59-69.
DOI URL |
[32] |
Leifeld J, Meyer S, Budge K, Sebastia MT, Zimmermann M, Fuhrer J ( 2015). Turnover of grassland roots in mountain ecosystems revealed by their radiocarbon signature: Role of temperature and management. PLOS ONE, 10, e0119184. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119184.
DOI URL PMID |
[33] | Li YN ( 1998). Relationship between underground biomass and meteorological conditions and turnover value of alpine meadow plants. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 19(1), 36-38. |
李英年 ( 1998). 高寒草甸植物地下生物量与气象条件的关系及周转值分析. 中国农业气象, 19(1), 36-38. | |
[34] |
Li Z, Wu PT, Feng H, Zhao XN, Huang J, Zhuang WH ( 2010). Simulated experiment on effects of soil bulk density on soil water holding capacity. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 47, 611-620.
DOI URL |
李卓, 吴普特, 冯浩, 赵西宁, 黄俊, 庄文化 ( 2010). 容重对土壤水分蓄持能力影响模拟试验研究. 土壤学报, 47, 611-620.
DOI URL |
|
[35] | Lü DQ, Shao MA, Pan Y ( 2009). Dependent relationship between bulk density changes and soil water characteristics. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 23, 209-212. |
吕殿青, 邵明安, 潘云 ( 2009). 容重变化与土壤水分特征的依赖关系研究. 水土保持学报, 23, 209-212. | |
[36] |
Lü GA, Chen ML, Wang CC ( 2000). Study on the soil water characteristics of the lithosol in the Danjiangkou Reservoir basin. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 19, 342-345.
DOI URL |
吕国安, 陈明亮, 王春潮 ( 2000). 丹江口库区石渣土土壤水分特性研究. 华中农业大学学报, 19, 342-345.
DOI URL |
|
[37] |
Ma T, Dong YS, Qi YC, Xu FL, Peng Q, Jin Z ( 2009). Effects of grazing on soil respiration in typical Leymus chinensis steppe in Inner Mongolia. Geographical Research, 28, 1040-1046.
DOI URL |
马涛, 董云社, 齐玉春, 徐福利, 彭琴, 金钊 ( 2009). 放牧对内蒙古羊草群落土壤呼吸的影响. 地理研究, 28, 1040-1046.
DOI URL |
|
[38] |
Milchunas DG ( 2009). Estimating root production: Comparison of 11 methods in shortgrass steppe and review of biases . Ecosystems, 12, 1381-1402.
DOI URL |
[39] |
Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK, Singh JS, Cole CV, Hunt HW ( 1985). Root turnover and production by 14C dilution: Implications of carbon partitioning in plants . Plant and Soil, 88, 353-365.
DOI URL |
[40] |
Ni J ( 2004). Estimating net primary productivity of grasslands from field biomass measurements in temperate northern China. Plant Ecology, 174, 217-234.
DOI URL |
[41] |
Odum EP ( 1960). Organic production and turnover in old field succession. Ecology, 41, 34-49.
DOI URL |
[42] | Pan YJ, Lü SH, Gao YH, Li ZG ( 2015). Simulation of influence of gravel on soil thermal and hydraulic properties on Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Plateau Meteorology, 34, 1224-1236. |
潘永洁, 吕世华, 高艳红, 李照国 ( 2015). 砾石对青藏高原土壤水热特性影响的数值模拟. 高原气象, 34, 1224-1236. | |
[43] |
Peng YF, Guo DL, Yang YH ( 2017). Global patterns of root dynamics under nitrogen enrichment. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26, 102-114.
DOI URL |
[44] |
Penning de Vries FWT ( 1975). The cost of maintenance process in plant cells. Annual of Botany, 39, 77-92.
DOI URL |
[45] |
Ryan MG ( 1991). Effects of climate change on plant respiration. Ecological Applications, 1, 157-167.
DOI URL PMID |
[46] |
Schippers P, Olff H ( 2000). Biomass partitioning, architecture and turnover of six herbaceous species from habitats with different nutrient supply. Plant Ecology, 149, 219-231.
DOI URL |
[47] |
Shaver GR, Billings WD ( 1975). Root production and root turnover in a wet tundra ecosystem, Barrow, Alaska. Ecology, 56, 401-409.
DOI URL |
[48] |
Shi ZJ, Wang YH, Yu PT, Xu LH, Xiong W, Guo H ( 2008). Effect of rock fragments on the percolation and evaporation of forest soil in the Liupan Mountains, China. Acta Ecologic Sinica, 28, 6090-6098.
DOI URL |
时忠杰, 王彦辉, 于澎涛, 徐丽宏, 熊伟, 郭浩 ( 2008). 六盘山森林土壤中的砾石对渗透性和蒸发的影响. 生态学报, 28, 6090-6098.
DOI URL |
|
[49] |
Tom MS, Trumbore SE, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM, Hendricks DM ( 1997). Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature, 389, 170-173.
DOI URL |
[50] |
Trumbore SE, Gaudinski JB ( 2003). The secret lives of roots. Science, 302, 1344-1345.
DOI URL |
[51] |
Vogt KA, Crier CC, Vogt DJ ( 1986). Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 303-377.
DOI URL |
[52] |
Volder A, Gifford RM, Evans JR ( 2007). Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2, cutting frequency, and differential day/night atmospheric warming on root growth and turnover of Phalaris swards. Global Change Biology, 13, 1040-1052.
DOI URL |
[53] |
Wang CH, Xing XR, Han XG ( 2004). The effects of temperature and moisture on the soil net nitrogen mineralization in an Aneulolepidium chinensis grassland, Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 11, 2472-2476.
DOI URL |
王常慧, 邢雪荣, 韩兴国 ( 2004). 温度和湿度对我国内蒙古羊草草原土壤净氮矿化的影响. 生态学报, 11, 2472-2476.
DOI URL |
|
[54] |
Wang CT, Wang QJ, Long RJ, Jing ZC, Shi HL ( 2004). Changes in plant species diversity and productivity along an elevation gradient in an alpine meadow. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28, 240-245.
DOI URL |
王长庭, 王启基, 龙瑞军, 景增春, 史惠兰 ( 2004). 高寒草甸群落植物多样性和初级生产力沿海拔梯度变化的研究. 植物生态学报, 28, 240-245.
DOI URL |
|
[55] | Wang CT, Wang QJ, Shen ZX, Jing ZC, Wang WY ( 2003). Response of biodiversity and productivity to simulated rainfall on an alpine Kobresia humilis meadow. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 10, 1713-1718. |
王长庭, 王启基, 沈振西, 景增春, 王文颖 ( 2003). 高寒矮嵩草草甸群落植物多样性和初级生产力对模拟降水的响应. 西北植物学报, 10, 1713-1718. | |
[56] |
Wang H, Wang QJ, Shao MA ( 2007). Effect of soil bulk density on soil nutrient in runoff from loess slope. Journal of soil and Water Conservation, 21(3), 10-13.
DOI URL |
王辉, 王全九, 邵明安 ( 2007). 表层土壤容重对黄土坡面养分随径流迁移的影响. 水土保持学报, 21(3), 10-13.
DOI URL |
|
[57] | Wang W, Peng SS, Fang JY ( 2008). Biomass distribution of natural grasslands and its response to climate change in North China. Arid Zone Research, 25, 90-97. |
王娓, 彭书时, 方精云 ( 2008). 中国北方天然草地的生物量分配及其对气候的响应. 干旱区研究, 25, 90-97. | |
[58] | Wilcox B P, Wood MK ( 1988). Factors influencing inter rill erosion from semiarid slopes in New Mexico. Journal of Range Management, 42, 66-70. |
[59] | Wu JH, Zhang TG, Zhao W, Li JK, Yang L ( 2013). Influence of soil bulk density on soil water infiltration characteristics under different soil organic matter contents. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 27(3), 63-67. |
吴军虎, 张铁钢, 赵伟, 李家科, 杨亮 ( 2013). 容重对不同有机质含量土壤水分入渗特性的影响. 水土保持学报, 27(3), 63-67. | |
[60] |
Wu YB, Che RX, Ma S, Deng YC, Zhu MJ, Cui XY ( 2014). Estimation of root production and turnover in an alpine meadow: Comparison of three measurement methods. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 3529-3537.
DOI URL |
吴伊波, 车荣晓, 马双, 邓永翠, 朱敏健, 崔骁勇 ( 2014). 高寒草甸植被细根生产和周转的比较研究. 生态学报, 34, 3529-3537.
DOI URL |
|
[61] | Yu WT, Yu YQ ( 2001). Reviewed of plant underground biomass. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 12, 927-932. |
宇万太, 于永强 ( 2001). 植物地下生物量研究进展. 应用生态学报, 12, 927-932. | |
[62] | Zhou WC, Suolang DEJ, Cui LJ, Wang YF, Li W ( 2016). Effects of drainage on soil organic carbon stock in the Zoige peatlands eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 2123-2132. |
周文昌, 索郎夺尔基, 崔丽娟, 王义飞, 李伟 ( 2016). 排水对若尔盖高原泥炭地土壤有机碳储量的影响. 生态学报, 36, 2123-2132. | |
[63] | Zhu TC ( 1993). Grasslands of China. In: Coupland RT ed . Ecosystems of the World: Eastern Hemisphere and Résumé, No. 8B. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 61-82. |
[1] | 杨宇萌 来全 刘心怡. 气候变化和人类活动对内蒙古植被总初级生产力的定量影响分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 冯珊珊, 黄春晖, 唐梦云, 蒋维昕, 白天道. 细叶云南松针叶形态和显微性状地理变异及其环境解释[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1116-1130. |
[3] | 任培鑫, 李鹏, 彭长辉, 周晓路, 杨铭霞. 洞庭湖流域植被光合物候的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 319-330. |
[4] | 李杰, 郝珉辉, 范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 东北温带森林树种和功能多样性对生态系统多功能性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1507-1522. |
[5] | 魏瑶, 马志远, 周佳颖, 张振华. 模拟增温改变青藏高原植物繁殖物候及植株高度[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 995-1004. |
[6] | 党宏忠, 张学利, 韩辉, 石长春, 葛玉祥, 马全林, 陈帅, 刘春颖. 樟子松固沙林林水关系研究进展及对营林实践的指导[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 971-983. |
[7] | 李肖, PIALUANG Bounthong, 康文辉, 冀晓东, 张海江, 薛治国, 张志强. 近几十年来冀西北山地白桦次生林径向生长对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 919-931. |
[8] | 苏启陶, 杜志喧, 周兵, 廖永辉, 王呈呈, 肖宜安. 牯岭凤仙花及其传粉昆虫在中国的潜在分布区域分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 785-796. |
[9] | 胡潇飞, 魏临风, 程琦, 吴星麒, 倪健. 青藏高原地区气候图解数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(4): 484-492. |
[10] | 原媛, 母艳梅, 邓钰洁, 李鑫豪, 姜晓燕, 高圣杰, 查天山, 贾昕. 植被覆盖度和物候变化对典型黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统总初级生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 162-175. |
[11] | 丛楠, 张扬建, 朱军涛. 北半球中高纬度地区近30年植被春季物候温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 125-135. |
[12] | 牟文博, 徐当会, 王谢军, 敬文茂, 张瑞英, 顾玉玲, 姚广前, 祁世华, 张龙, 苟亚飞. 排露沟流域不同海拔灌丛土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1422-1431. |
[13] | 张央, 安明态, 武建勇, 刘锋, 汪伟. 中国兜兰属宽瓣亚属植物地理分布格局及其主导气候因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(1): 40-50. |
[14] | 刘宁, 彭守璋, 陈云明. 气候因子对青藏高原植被生长的时间效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(1): 18-26. |
[15] | 高德才, 白娥. 冻融循环期间土壤氧化亚氮排放影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 1006-1023. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19