Twig size-number trade-off among woody plants in Tiantong region, Zhejiang Province of China

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.01268

Abstract

Abstract:

Aims The branch size-number trade-off among woody plants has implications for both the formation of plant architecture and biomass allocation in response to environment stresses. Our objective was to examine how the twig size-number relationship varies among woody plants in subtropical broad-leaved evergreen forests in southeastern China.Methods The study site is located in Tiantong National Forest Park (29°52′ N, 121°39′ E), Zhejiang Province, in Eastern China. We measured twig length, twig diameter, number of twigs and length and diameter of branches from which the twigs were sampled for 76 woody species in a 1-hm ^-2 plot. Standardized major axis (SMA) analysis was conducted to examine the quantitative relationship between twig size (cross-sectional area) and the number of twigs at a given twig size (twig intensity). Important findings A significantly negative allometric scaling relationship was found between twig intensity and its cross-sectional area. Under level-II light exposure (LE-II, 40%-80% of the plant under direct light), evergreen species had a much higher twig intensity than deciduous species. However, there was no difference in twig intensity between these two life forms under LE-I (<40% exposure) or LE-III (>80% exposure). Higher twig intensity was found in evergreen species under LI-III than under both LE-I and LE-II. In contrast, twig intensity of deciduous species was not different among any of the light exposure levels. Shrubs <4 m height had higher twig intensity than sub-trees and trees >4 m at a given twig size. We conclude that the twig size-number trade-off across woody plants in Tiantong was consistent with the Corner’s rule (that describes the relationship between twig size and the number of twigs), but might differ among different life forms. Both evergreen species and shrubs are inclined to develop higher twig intensity, which indicates their adaptation to environment stress caused by limitations in light availability.

Key words: allometry, Corner rule, evergreen broad-leaved forest, exposure, life form

XU Yue, YANG Xiao-Dong, XIE Yi-Ming, XU Yi-Lu, Scott X CHANG, YAN En-Rong. Twig size-number trade-off among woody plants in Tiantong region, Zhejiang Province of China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(12): 1268-1276.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.01268

https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/Y2012/V36/I12/1268

Figures/Tables 6

Fig. 1 Regression relationship between twig intensity and twig cross-sectional area across species (n = 76). ***, P < 0.001.

Table 1 Results of two-way ANOVA of life form and light exposure for plant twig “size-number”

因子 Factor	自由度 df	小枝稠密度 Twig intensity		小枝大小 Twig size
		F	p	F	p
生活型 Life form	1	7.87	< 0.010	71.96	< 0.001
曝光度 Light exposure	2	11.90	< 0.001	47.43	< 0.001
生活型×曝光度 Life form × light exposure	2	0.08	> 0.050	3.27	< 0.050

Fig. 2 Regression relationship between twig intensity and twig cross-sectional area for evergreen and deciduous species at the same level of light exposure. A, Level-I light exposure. B, Level-II light exposure. C, Level-III light exposure. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001.

Fig. 3 Regression relationship between twig intensity and twig cross-sectional area for each of evergreen (A) and deciduous (B) species at different level of light exposure. LE-I, LE-II and LE-III are three levels of light exposure. ***, p < 0.001.

Table 2 Results of two-way ANOVA of growth form and light exposure for plant twig “size-number”

因子 Factor	自由度 df	小枝稠密度 Twig intensity		小枝大小 Twig size
		F	p	F	p
生长型 Growth form	1	52.23	< 0.001	270.50	< 0.001
曝光度 Light exposure	2	1.89	> 0.050	8.81	> 0.050
生长型×曝光度 Growth form × light exposure	2	0.72	> 0.050	8.72	> 0.050

Fig. 4 Regression relationship between twig intensity and twig cross-sectional area for plants living in shrub and tree layers. H1, H2 and H3 represent shrub, sub-tree and tree layer, respectively. ***, p < 0.001.

References 47

1	Brouat C, Gibernau M, Amsellem L, McKey D ( 1998). Corner’s rules revisited: ontogenetic and interspecific patterns in leaf-stem allometry. New Phytologist, 139, 459-470.
2	Chapin FS III ( 1980). The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 233-260.
3	Coomes DA, Grubb PJ ( 1998). A comparison of 12 tree species of Amazonian caatinga using growth rates in gaps and understorey, and allometric relationships. Functional Ecology, 12, 426-435.
4	Corner EJH ( 1949). The Durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Annals of Botany, 13, 367-414.
5	Daviero V, Meyer-Berthaud B, Lecoustre R ( 2000). Computer simulation of sphenopsid architecture. I. Principles and methodology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 109, 121-134.
6	Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ ( 2001). Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities. Nature, 410, 655-660.
7	Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ ( 2002). Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 295, 1517-1520.
8	Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2006). User’s Guide to SMATR: Standardised Major Axis Tests & Routines Version 2.0.http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/ . Cited March 11, 2012.
9	Gautier H, Mech R, Prusinkiewicz P, Varlet-Grancher C ( 2000). 3D architectural modelling of aerial photomorphogenesis in white clover ( Trifolium repens L.) using 1-systems. Annals of Botany, 85, 359-370.
10	Givnish TJ ( 1988). Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 15, 63-92.
11	Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB ( 1978). Tropical Trees and Forests: an Architectural Analysis. Springer, Berlin.
12	Henriksson J ( 2001). Differential shading of branches or whole trees: survival, growth, and reproduction. Oecologia, 126, 482-486.
13	Jensen S, Bell S ( 2001). Seagrass growth and patch dynamics: cross-scale morphological plasticity. Plant Ecology, 155, 201-217.
14	King DA, Davies SJ, Nur Supardi MN, Tan S ( 2005). Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Functional Ecology, 19, 445-453.
15	King DA, Maindonald JH ( 1999). Tree architecture in relation to leaf dimensions and tree stature in temperate and tropical rain forests. Journal of Ecology, 87, 1012-1024.
16	Kleiman D, Aarssen LW ( 2007). The leaf size/number trade-off in trees. Journal of Ecology, 95, 376-382.
17	Kohyama T, Hotta M ( 1990). Significance of allometry in tropical saplings. Functional Ecology, 4, 515-521.
18	Li T, Deng JM, Wang GX, Cheng DL, Yu ZL ( 2009). Isometric scaling relationship between leaf number and size within current-year shoots of woody species across contrasting habitats. Polish Journal of Ecology, 57, 659-667.
19	Marcuvitz S, Turkington R ( 2000). Differential effects of light quality, provided by different grass neighbours, on the growth and morphology of Trifolium repens L.(white clover). Oecologia, 125, 293-300.
20	Niklas KJ, Cobb ED, Niinemets Ü, Reich PB, Sellin A, Shipley B, Wright IJ ( 2007). “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of functional leaf traits across and within species groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 8891-8896.
21	Normand F, Bissery C, Damour G, Lauri PÉ ( 2008). Hydraulic and mechanical stem properties affect leaf-stem allometry in mango cultivars. New Phytologist, 178, 590-602.
22	Pickett STA, Kempf JS ( 1980). Branching patterns in forest shrubs and understory trees in relation to habitat. New Phytologist, 86, 219-228.
23	Poorter L, Wright SJ, Paz H, Ackerly DD, Condit R, Ibarra- Manríquez G, Harms KE, Licona JC, Martínez-Ramos M, Mazer SJ, Muller-Landau HC, Peña-Claros M, Webb CO, Wright IJ ( 2008). Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. Ecology, 89, 1908-1920.
24	Poorter H, Nagel O ( 2000). The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO₂, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 27, 1191-1191.
25	Preston KA, Ackerly DD ( 2003). Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates. American Journal of Botany, 90, 1502-1512. DOI URL
26	Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Walters MB, Vose JM, Gresham C, Volin JC, Bowman WD ( 1999). Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology, 80, 1955-1969. DOI URL
27	Roderick ML ( 2000). On the measurement of growth with applications to the modelling and analysis of plant growth. Functional Ecology, 14, 244-251.
28	Sachs T ( 1981). The control of the patterned differentiation of vascular tissues. Advances in Botanical Research, 9, 151-262.
29	Sachs T, Novoplansky A, Cohen D ( 1993). Plants as competing populations of redundant organs. Plant, Cell & Environment, 16, 765-770.
30	Sakai S ( 1995). Evolutionarily stable growth of a sapling which waits for future gap formation under closed canopy. Evolutionary Ecology, 9, 444-452.
31	Song YC ( 宋永昌), Wang XR ( 王祥荣 ) (1995). Vegetation and Flora of Tiantong National Forest Park Zhejiang Provi- nce (浙江天童国家森林公园的植被和区系). Shanghai Scientific and Technical Document Publishing House, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
32	Sterck F, Martinéz-ramos M, Dyer-Leal G, Rodríguez- Velazquez J, Poorter L ( 2003). The consequences of crown traits for the growth and survival of tree saplings in a Mexican lowland rainforest. Functional Ecology, 17, 194-200.
33	Sun SC, Jin DM, Shi PL ( 2006). The leaf size-twig size spectrum of temperate woody species along an altitudinal gradient: an invariant allometric scaling relationship. Annals of Botany, 97, 97-107. DOI URL
34	Sun SC, Niklas KJ, Fang F, Xiang S, Wu XW, Yang XC ( 2010). Is branching intensity interspecifically related to biomass allocation? A survey of 25 dicot shrub species from an open-growing dry valley. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 171, 615-625. DOI URL
35	Takahashi K, Rustandi A ( 2006). Responses of crown development to canopy openings by saplings of eight tropical submontane forest tree species in Indonesia: a comparison with cool-temperate trees. Annals of Botany, 97, 559-569.
36	Takenaka A ( 2000). Shoot growth responses to light microenvironment and correlative inhibition in tree seedlings under a forest canopy. Tree Physiology, 20, 987-991.
37	Turner IM (2001). The Ecology of Trees in the Tropical Rain Forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
38	Veres JS, Pickett STA ( 1982). Branching patterns of Lindera benzoin beneath gaps and closed canopies. New Phytologist, 91, 767-772.
39	Warton DI, Weber NC ( 2002). Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biometrical Journal, 44, 161-174.
40	West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ ( 1999). A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature, 400, 664-667.
41	Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ ( 2002). Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 125-159.
42	Westoby M, Wright IJ ( 2003). The leaf size-twig size spectrum and its relationship to other important spectra of variation among species. Oecologia, 135, 621-628.
43	Whitney GG ( 1976). The bifurcation ratio as an indicator of adaptive strategy in woody plant species. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 103, 67-72.
44	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M ( 2001). Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology, 15, 423-434.
45	Wright IJ, Westoby M, Reich PB ( 2002). Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient-poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span. Journal of Ecology, 90, 534-543.
46	Xiang S, Wu N, Sun SC ( 2009). Within-twig biomass allocation in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved species along an altitudinal gradient: allometric scaling analysis. Trees-Structure and Function, 23, 637-647.
47	Yang DM ( 杨冬梅), Zhan F ( 占峰), Zhang HW ( 张宏伟 ) ( 2012). Trade-off between leaf size and number in current-year twigs of deciduous broad-leaved woody species at different altitudes on Qingliang Mountain, southeastern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 36, 281-291. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1]	LIU Yan-Jie, LIU Yu-Long, WANG Chuan-Kuan, WANG Xing-Chang. Comparison of leaf cost-benefit relationship for five pinnate compound-leaf tree species in temperate forests of northeast China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1540-1550.
[2]	WANG Guang-Ya, CHEN Bing-Hua, HUANG Yu-Chen, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Effects of growing position on leaflet trait variations and its correlations in Fraxinus mandshurica [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 712-721.
[3]	ZHAI Jiang-Wei, LIN Xin-Hui, WU Rui-Zhe, XU Yi-Xin, JIN Hao-Hao, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Trade-offs between petiole and lamina of different functional plants in Xiao Hinggan Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 700-711.
[4]	PENG Xin, JIN Guang-Ze. Effects of plant characteristics and environmental factors on the dark diversity in a broadleaved Korean pine forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 656-666.
[5]	SHI Bin, DOU Jian-De, HUANG Wei, LI Xiao-Wei. Community characteristics of Ephedra rhytidosperma in Helan Mountain of Ningxia, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(3): 362-367.
[6]	XIONG Ying-Jie, YU Guo, WEI Kai-Lu, PENG Juan, GENG Hong-Ru, YANG Dong-Mei, PENG Guo-Quan. Relationships between lamina size, vein density and vein cell wall dry mass per unit vein length of broad-leaved woody species in Tiantong Mountain, southeastern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 136-147.
[7]	ZHU Hua. Vegetation geography of evergreen broad-leaved forests in Yunnan, southwestern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(3): 224-241.
[8]	YANG Ke-Tong, CHANG Hai-Long, CHEN Guo-Peng, YU Xiao-Ya, XIAN Jun-Ren. Stomatal traits of main greening plant species in Lanzhou [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(2): 187-196.
[9]	LIU Ling, FAN Ying-Jie, SONG Xiao-Tong, LI Min, SHAO Xiao-Ming, WANG Xiao-Rui. Bryophyte societies on the fallen logs of Pinus armandii with different decay classes in Sygera Mountains [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(8): 842-853.
[10]	XIONG Xing-Shuo, CAI Hong-Yu, LI Yao-Qi, MA Wen-Hong, NIU Ke-Chang, CHEN Di-Ma, LIU Na-Na, SU Xiang-Yan, JING He-Ying, FENG Xiao-Juan, ZENG Hui, WANG Zhi-Heng. Seasonal dynamics of leaf C, N and P stoichiometry in plants of typical steppe in Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(11): 1138-1153.
[11]	MO Dan, WANG Zhen-Meng, ZUO You-Lu, XIANG Shuang. Trade-off between shooting and leaf developing of woody species saplings in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(10): 995-1006.
[12]	LU Shuai-Zhi, QIAO Xian-Guo, ZHAO Li-Qing, WANG Zi, GAO Chen-Guang, WANG Jing, GUO Ke. Basic characteristics of Stipa sareptana var. krylovii communities in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(10): 1087-1094.
[13]	LI Zi-Jing, SHA Na, SHI Ya-Bo, TONG Xu-Ze, DONG Lei, ZHANG Xiao-Qing, SUN Qiang, LIANG Cun-Zhu. Classification and characteristics of Helianthemum songaricum communities in western Erdos region, Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(9): 806-816.
[14]	FAN Hai-Dong, CHEN Hai-Yan, WU Yan-Nan, LIU Jian-Feng, XU De-Yu, CAO Jia-Yu, YUAN Quan, TAN Bin, LIU Xiao-Tong, XU Jia, WANG Guo-Min, HAN Wen-Juan, LIU Li-Bin, NI Jian. Community characteristics of main vegetation types on the southern slope of Beishan Mountain in Jinhua, Zhejiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(10): 921-928.
[15]	GAO Chen-Guang, QIAO Xian-Guo, WANG Zi, LU Shuai-Zhi, HOU Dong-Jie, LIU Chang-Cheng, ZHAO Li-Qing, GUO Ke. Distribution, community characteristics and classification of Thymus mongolicus steppe in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(9): 971-976.