Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 52-60.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00006
Special Issue: 生物多样性
• Review • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Jun1, JIANG Jing-Min1,*(), ZOU Jun2, XU Jin-Liang3, SHEN Han3, DIAO Song-Feng1
Received:
2012-08-27
Accepted:
2012-11-28
Online:
2013-08-27
Published:
2013-01-15
Contact:
JIANG Jing-Min
LIU Jun, JIANG Jing-Min, ZOU Jun, XU Jin-Liang, SHEN Han, DIAO Song-Feng. Genetic diversity of central and peripheral populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens, an endangered tree species endemic to China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(1): 52-60.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00006
居群 Population | 所属省份 Province | 类型 Type | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | 海拔高度 Altitude (m) | 采样数量 Sampled number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宜丰 | 江西 | 核心居群 | 114°29′-114°45′ E | 28°30′-28°40′ N | 220-475 | 65 |
Yifeng (YF) | Jiangxi | Central population | ||||
泾县 | 安徽 | 核心居群 | 118°35′-118°36′ E | 30°31′-30°34′ N | 270-497 | 48 |
Jingxian (JX) | Anhui | Central population | ||||
仙居 | 浙江 | 核心居群 | 120°32′-120°56′ E | 28°48′-28°56′ N | 600-820 | 27 |
Xianju (XJ) | Zhejiang | Central population | ||||
遂昌 | 浙江 | 核心居群 | 119°12′-119°23′ E | 28°30′-28°36′ N | 510-1 220 | 25 |
Suichang (SC) | Zhejiang | Central population | ||||
宾川 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 100°16′-101°23′ E | 25°02′-25°22′ N | 1 404-1 820 | 60 |
Binchuan (BC) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
元谋 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 101°49′-101°52′ E | 25°17′-25°40′ N | 1 112-1 230 | 30 |
Yuanmou (YM) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
武定 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 102°08′-102°12′ E | 25°47′-25°51′ N | 1 405-1 802 | 29 |
Wuding (WD) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
师宗 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 103°42′-104°34′ E | 24°21′-25°00′ N | 812-912 | 84 |
Shizong (SZ) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
册亨 | 贵州 | 边缘居群 | 105°40′-105°52′ E | 24°36′-24°55′ N | 620-810 | 24 |
Ceheng (CH) | Guizhou | Peripheral population |
Table 1 Geographic place and individuals sampled for nine natural populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens
居群 Population | 所属省份 Province | 类型 Type | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | 海拔高度 Altitude (m) | 采样数量 Sampled number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宜丰 | 江西 | 核心居群 | 114°29′-114°45′ E | 28°30′-28°40′ N | 220-475 | 65 |
Yifeng (YF) | Jiangxi | Central population | ||||
泾县 | 安徽 | 核心居群 | 118°35′-118°36′ E | 30°31′-30°34′ N | 270-497 | 48 |
Jingxian (JX) | Anhui | Central population | ||||
仙居 | 浙江 | 核心居群 | 120°32′-120°56′ E | 28°48′-28°56′ N | 600-820 | 27 |
Xianju (XJ) | Zhejiang | Central population | ||||
遂昌 | 浙江 | 核心居群 | 119°12′-119°23′ E | 28°30′-28°36′ N | 510-1 220 | 25 |
Suichang (SC) | Zhejiang | Central population | ||||
宾川 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 100°16′-101°23′ E | 25°02′-25°22′ N | 1 404-1 820 | 60 |
Binchuan (BC) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
元谋 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 101°49′-101°52′ E | 25°17′-25°40′ N | 1 112-1 230 | 30 |
Yuanmou (YM) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
武定 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 102°08′-102°12′ E | 25°47′-25°51′ N | 1 405-1 802 | 29 |
Wuding (WD) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
师宗 | 云南 | 边缘居群 | 103°42′-104°34′ E | 24°21′-25°00′ N | 812-912 | 84 |
Shizong (SZ) | Yunnan | Peripheral population | ||||
册亨 | 贵州 | 边缘居群 | 105°40′-105°52′ E | 24°36′-24°55′ N | 620-810 | 24 |
Ceheng (CH) | Guizhou | Peripheral population |
位点 Loci | GenBank Accession No. | 引物序列 Primer sequence (5′-3′) | 重复序列 Repeat motif | 退火温度 Annealing temperature (℃) | 等位基因大小 Allele size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tc01 | DQ778303 | F: TCAATGCAATTTAGGAGGAA | (GA)8 | 52 | 240-291 |
R: TGCTTGTTGAACCCTGTG | |||||
Tc02 | DQ453904 | F: TAGGAAAGGCAAGGTGGG | (AG)14 | 55 | 109-120 |
R: GGGTGGTCGATGAGGGTT | |||||
Tc03 | DQ453907 | F: GATTACGCCAGGCAAACG | (CT)6 | 55 | 230-320 |
R: TTGAATATGGGAGAAGGT | |||||
Tc04 | DQ453906 | F: GAAACCAGCAGGCAGAGC | (AG)10 | 55 | 110-230 |
R: GAAGAAGGGTGAGCGAGA | |||||
Tc05 | DQ453905 | F: AGTAATAGCCTGTAGAGCAG | (AG)13 | 55 | 120-242 |
R: AGAGTGGGGTGGTCGATGAG | |||||
Tc06 | DQ453903 | F: GACTCGTGACACTTAGCCTGTA | (TTTCTC)7 | 55 | 121-231 |
R: CTGGCGTAATCATGGTCATAC | |||||
Tc07 | DQ453912 | F: ATGGATGAGTGTGCGATAGG | (TC)7 | 55 | 182-280 |
R: TGTGATGTAGGAGTCTGAAC | |||||
Tc08 | DQ453914 | F: TGTCTCAGTTTATGCTGGCGT | (TC)8 | 55 | 170-260 |
R: CTGCCCAATCAACAAGAG |
Table 2 PCR primers for amplifying eight SSR loci in Toona ciliata var. pubescens
位点 Loci | GenBank Accession No. | 引物序列 Primer sequence (5′-3′) | 重复序列 Repeat motif | 退火温度 Annealing temperature (℃) | 等位基因大小 Allele size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tc01 | DQ778303 | F: TCAATGCAATTTAGGAGGAA | (GA)8 | 52 | 240-291 |
R: TGCTTGTTGAACCCTGTG | |||||
Tc02 | DQ453904 | F: TAGGAAAGGCAAGGTGGG | (AG)14 | 55 | 109-120 |
R: GGGTGGTCGATGAGGGTT | |||||
Tc03 | DQ453907 | F: GATTACGCCAGGCAAACG | (CT)6 | 55 | 230-320 |
R: TTGAATATGGGAGAAGGT | |||||
Tc04 | DQ453906 | F: GAAACCAGCAGGCAGAGC | (AG)10 | 55 | 110-230 |
R: GAAGAAGGGTGAGCGAGA | |||||
Tc05 | DQ453905 | F: AGTAATAGCCTGTAGAGCAG | (AG)13 | 55 | 120-242 |
R: AGAGTGGGGTGGTCGATGAG | |||||
Tc06 | DQ453903 | F: GACTCGTGACACTTAGCCTGTA | (TTTCTC)7 | 55 | 121-231 |
R: CTGGCGTAATCATGGTCATAC | |||||
Tc07 | DQ453912 | F: ATGGATGAGTGTGCGATAGG | (TC)7 | 55 | 182-280 |
R: TGTGATGTAGGAGTCTGAAC | |||||
Tc08 | DQ453914 | F: TGTCTCAGTTTATGCTGGCGT | (TC)8 | 55 | 170-260 |
R: CTGCCCAATCAACAAGAG |
位点 Loci | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
观察等位基因数 Na | 有效等位基因数 Ne | 观察等位基因数 Na | 有效等位基因数 Ne | 观察等位基因数 Na | 有效等位基因数 Ne | |||
Tc01 | 6.00 | 3.37 | 3.00 | 1.98 | 5.00 | 3.64 | ||
Tc02 | 6.00 | 1.60 | 3.00 | 1.73 | 6.00 | 1.48 | ||
Tc03 | 6.00 | 2.57 | 4.00 | 2.94 | 6.00 | 2.27 | ||
Tc04 | 8.00 | 3.42 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 6.00 | 2.57 | ||
Tc05 | 8.00 | 3.36 | 3.00 | 2.93 | 8.00 | 2.57 | ||
Tc06 | 8.00 | 3.87 | 6.00 | 3.23 | 8.00 | 4.25 | ||
Tc07 | 8.00 | 3.44 | 7.00 | 2.58 | 8.00 | 4.06 | ||
Tc08 | 6.00 | 2.45 | 6.00 | 1.82 | 4.00 | 2.09 | ||
平均值 Mean | 7.00 | 3.01 | 4.75 | 2.53 | 6.38 | 2.87 | ||
标准偏差 SD | 1.07 | 0.74 | 1.58 | 0.59 | 1.51 | 1.00 |
Table 3 Observed (Na) and effective number of alleles (Ne) in populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens
位点 Loci | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
观察等位基因数 Na | 有效等位基因数 Ne | 观察等位基因数 Na | 有效等位基因数 Ne | 观察等位基因数 Na | 有效等位基因数 Ne | |||
Tc01 | 6.00 | 3.37 | 3.00 | 1.98 | 5.00 | 3.64 | ||
Tc02 | 6.00 | 1.60 | 3.00 | 1.73 | 6.00 | 1.48 | ||
Tc03 | 6.00 | 2.57 | 4.00 | 2.94 | 6.00 | 2.27 | ||
Tc04 | 8.00 | 3.42 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 6.00 | 2.57 | ||
Tc05 | 8.00 | 3.36 | 3.00 | 2.93 | 8.00 | 2.57 | ||
Tc06 | 8.00 | 3.87 | 6.00 | 3.23 | 8.00 | 4.25 | ||
Tc07 | 8.00 | 3.44 | 7.00 | 2.58 | 8.00 | 4.06 | ||
Tc08 | 6.00 | 2.45 | 6.00 | 1.82 | 4.00 | 2.09 | ||
平均值 Mean | 7.00 | 3.01 | 4.75 | 2.53 | 6.38 | 2.87 | ||
标准偏差 SD | 1.07 | 0.74 | 1.58 | 0.59 | 1.51 | 1.00 |
Fig. 1 Distribution of different types of alleles in nine natural populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens. CL, common local allele; CW, common wide allele; RL, rare local allele; RW, rare wide allele. Population see Table 1.
位点 Loci | 观察杂合度 HO | 期望杂合度 HE | Nei’s期望杂合度 Nei’s HE | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | |||
Tc01 | 0.591 1 | 0.222 9 | 0.845 8 | 0.704 4 | 0.496 4 | 0.726 9 | 0.703 5 | 0.494 8 | 0.725 3 | ||
Tc02 | 0.354 2 | 0.560 5 | 0.211 5 | 0.376 2 | 0.425 8 | 0.324 3 | 0.375 7 | 0.424 4 | 0.323 6 | ||
Tc03 | 0.492 2 | 0.598 7 | 0.418 5 | 0.611 3 | 0.661 5 | 0.561 1 | 0.610 5 | 0.659 4 | 0.559 8 | ||
Tc04 | 0.783 9 | 0.808 9 | 0.766 5 | 0.709 0 | 0.669 5 | 0.612 1 | 0.708 1 | 0.667 4 | 0.610 7 | ||
Tc05 | 0.504 2 | 0.562 9 | 0.461 5 | 0.703 1 | 0.661 4 | 0.612 8 | 0.702 2 | 0.659 2 | 0.611 3 | ||
Tc06 | 0.765 9 | 0.708 0 | 0.814 8 | 0.742 6 | 0.693 0 | 0.767 3 | 0.741 3 | 0.690 5 | 0.765 0 | ||
Tc07 | 0.522 4 | 0.344 8 | 0.657 9 | 0.710 1 | 0.614 2 | 0.755 9 | 0.709 0 | 0.612 0 | 0.753 9 | ||
Tc08 | 0.673 0 | 0.472 4 | 0.808 5 | 0.592 6 | 0.452 2 | 0.522 2 | 0.591 7 | 0.450 4 | 0.520 8 | ||
平均 Mean | 0.585 9 | 0.534 9 | 0.623 1 | 0.643 7 | 0.584 2 | 0.610 3 | 0.642 7 | 0.582 3 | 0.608 8 |
Table 4 Observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE) of eight microsatellite loci in central and peripheral population of Toona ciliata var. pubescens
位点 Loci | 观察杂合度 HO | 期望杂合度 HE | Nei’s期望杂合度 Nei’s HE | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | |||
Tc01 | 0.591 1 | 0.222 9 | 0.845 8 | 0.704 4 | 0.496 4 | 0.726 9 | 0.703 5 | 0.494 8 | 0.725 3 | ||
Tc02 | 0.354 2 | 0.560 5 | 0.211 5 | 0.376 2 | 0.425 8 | 0.324 3 | 0.375 7 | 0.424 4 | 0.323 6 | ||
Tc03 | 0.492 2 | 0.598 7 | 0.418 5 | 0.611 3 | 0.661 5 | 0.561 1 | 0.610 5 | 0.659 4 | 0.559 8 | ||
Tc04 | 0.783 9 | 0.808 9 | 0.766 5 | 0.709 0 | 0.669 5 | 0.612 1 | 0.708 1 | 0.667 4 | 0.610 7 | ||
Tc05 | 0.504 2 | 0.562 9 | 0.461 5 | 0.703 1 | 0.661 4 | 0.612 8 | 0.702 2 | 0.659 2 | 0.611 3 | ||
Tc06 | 0.765 9 | 0.708 0 | 0.814 8 | 0.742 6 | 0.693 0 | 0.767 3 | 0.741 3 | 0.690 5 | 0.765 0 | ||
Tc07 | 0.522 4 | 0.344 8 | 0.657 9 | 0.710 1 | 0.614 2 | 0.755 9 | 0.709 0 | 0.612 0 | 0.753 9 | ||
Tc08 | 0.673 0 | 0.472 4 | 0.808 5 | 0.592 6 | 0.452 2 | 0.522 2 | 0.591 7 | 0.450 4 | 0.520 8 | ||
平均 Mean | 0.585 9 | 0.534 9 | 0.623 1 | 0.643 7 | 0.584 2 | 0.610 3 | 0.642 7 | 0.582 3 | 0.608 8 |
居群 Population | 观察杂合度 HO | 期望杂合度 HE | Nei’s期望杂合度 Nei’s HE |
---|---|---|---|
宜丰 YF | 0.581 1 | 0.492 0 | 0.488 0 |
泾县 JX | 0.486 2 | 0.502 3 | 0.496 4 |
仙居 XJ | 0.610 3 | 0.467 4 | 0.454 8 |
遂昌 SC | 0.501 9 | 0.514 0 | 0.502 9 |
元谋 YM | 0.669 2 | 0.603 0 | 0.589 9 |
宾川 BC | 0.759 6 | 0.502 5 | 0.497 7 |
武定 WD | 0.684 8 | 0.490 0 | 0.480 5 |
师宗 SZ | 0.592 6 | 0.430 4 | 0.427 6 |
册亨 CH | 0.214 3 | 0.435 7 | 0.426 6 |
平均值 Mean | 0.585 9 | 0.643 7 | 0.642 7 |
Table 5 Genetic diversity in nine natural populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens
居群 Population | 观察杂合度 HO | 期望杂合度 HE | Nei’s期望杂合度 Nei’s HE |
---|---|---|---|
宜丰 YF | 0.581 1 | 0.492 0 | 0.488 0 |
泾县 JX | 0.486 2 | 0.502 3 | 0.496 4 |
仙居 XJ | 0.610 3 | 0.467 4 | 0.454 8 |
遂昌 SC | 0.501 9 | 0.514 0 | 0.502 9 |
元谋 YM | 0.669 2 | 0.603 0 | 0.589 9 |
宾川 BC | 0.759 6 | 0.502 5 | 0.497 7 |
武定 WD | 0.684 8 | 0.490 0 | 0.480 5 |
师宗 SZ | 0.592 6 | 0.430 4 | 0.427 6 |
册亨 CH | 0.214 3 | 0.435 7 | 0.426 6 |
平均值 Mean | 0.585 9 | 0.643 7 | 0.642 7 |
位点 Loci | Fis | Fit | FST | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | |||
Tc01 | -0.158 5 | 0.479 7 | -0.531 6 | 0.312 5 | 0.603 6 | 0.043 4 | 0.406 6 | 0.238 1 | 0.375 4 | ||
Tc02 | -0.316 0 | -0.460 6 | -0.157 9 | 0.063 8 | -0.349 5 | 0.317 7 | 0.288 6 | 0.076 1 | 0.410 8 | ||
Tc03 | 0.114 9 | -0.079 9 | 0.285 7 | 0.281 5 | 0.076 5 | 0.438 9 | 0.188 3 | 0.144 8 | 0.214 5 | ||
Tc04 | -0.397 5 | -0.443 0 | -0.356 9 | -0.047 0 | -0.267 8 | -0.034 6 | 0.250 8 | 0.121 4 | 0.237 5 | ||
Tc05 | -0.585 9 | -0.750 3 | -0.437 2 | 0.302 4 | 0.034 3 | 0.368 6 | 0.560 1 | 0.443 8 | 0.560 7 | ||
Tc06 | -0.235 1 | -0.086 9 | -0.372 2 | 0.005 4 | -0.034 0 | 0.005 9 | 0.194 7 | 0.048 7 | 0.275 5 | ||
Tc07 | 0.267 0 | 0.429 9 | 0.159 8 | 0.316 7 | 0.452 5 | 0.208 2 | 0.067 8 | 0.039 6 | 0.057 7 | ||
Tc08 | -0.393 6 | -0.110 6 | -0.620 3 | 0.129 4 | -0.041 4 | 0.051 3 | 0.375 3 | 0.062 3 | 0.414 5 | ||
平均值 Mean | -0.163 1 | -0.108 5 | -0.209 9 | 0.175 0 | 0.060 0 | 0.158 6 | 0.290 7 | 0.152 0 | 0.304 5 |
Table 6 Estimated F-statistics in central and peripheral populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens
位点 Loci | Fis | Fit | FST | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | 所有居群 All populations | 核心居群 Central population | 边缘居群 Peripheral population | |||
Tc01 | -0.158 5 | 0.479 7 | -0.531 6 | 0.312 5 | 0.603 6 | 0.043 4 | 0.406 6 | 0.238 1 | 0.375 4 | ||
Tc02 | -0.316 0 | -0.460 6 | -0.157 9 | 0.063 8 | -0.349 5 | 0.317 7 | 0.288 6 | 0.076 1 | 0.410 8 | ||
Tc03 | 0.114 9 | -0.079 9 | 0.285 7 | 0.281 5 | 0.076 5 | 0.438 9 | 0.188 3 | 0.144 8 | 0.214 5 | ||
Tc04 | -0.397 5 | -0.443 0 | -0.356 9 | -0.047 0 | -0.267 8 | -0.034 6 | 0.250 8 | 0.121 4 | 0.237 5 | ||
Tc05 | -0.585 9 | -0.750 3 | -0.437 2 | 0.302 4 | 0.034 3 | 0.368 6 | 0.560 1 | 0.443 8 | 0.560 7 | ||
Tc06 | -0.235 1 | -0.086 9 | -0.372 2 | 0.005 4 | -0.034 0 | 0.005 9 | 0.194 7 | 0.048 7 | 0.275 5 | ||
Tc07 | 0.267 0 | 0.429 9 | 0.159 8 | 0.316 7 | 0.452 5 | 0.208 2 | 0.067 8 | 0.039 6 | 0.057 7 | ||
Tc08 | -0.393 6 | -0.110 6 | -0.620 3 | 0.129 4 | -0.041 4 | 0.051 3 | 0.375 3 | 0.062 3 | 0.414 5 | ||
平均值 Mean | -0.163 1 | -0.108 5 | -0.209 9 | 0.175 0 | 0.060 0 | 0.158 6 | 0.290 7 | 0.152 0 | 0.304 5 |
居群 Population | 宜丰 YF | 泾县 JX | 仙居 XJ | 遂昌 SC | 元谋 YM | 宾川 BC | 武定 WD | 师宗 SZ | 册亨 CH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宜丰 YF | 0.000 0 | 0.617 8 | 1.442 6 | 0.547 7 | 0.754 4 | 0.650 9 | 46.046 3 | 12.440 4 | 0.261 1 |
泾县 JX | 0.288 1** | 0.000 0 | 0.869 1 | 0.649 9 | 0.650 9 | 0.567 3 | 0.638 1 | 0.691 3 | 0.308 5 |
仙居 XJ | 0.147 7 ns | 0.223 4** | 0.000 0 | 0.988 9 | 1.471 8 | 1.013 9 | 1.311 5 | 2.124 2 | 0.301 3 |
遂昌 SC | 0.313 4 ns | 0.277 8** | 0.201 8** | 0.000 0 | 11.769 2 | 3.902 8 | 0.474 0 | 0.662 7 | 0.190 5 |
元谋 YM | 0.248 9** | 0.277 5** | 0.145 2** | 0.020 8** | 0.000 0 | 7.866 9 | 0.666 4 | 0.964 8 | 0.220 3 |
宾川 BC | 0.277 5** | 0.305 9** | 0.197 8** | 0.060 2** | 0.030 8** | 0.000 0 | 0.587 2 | 0.702 7 | 0.179 8 |
武定 WD | 0.005 4** | 0.281 5** | 0.160 1** | 0.345 3** | 0.272 8** | 0.298 6** | 0.000 0 | 4.770 1 | 0.257 4 |
师宗 SZ | 0.019 7** | 0.265 6** | 0.105 3** | 0.273 9** | 0.205 8** | 0.262 4** | 0.049 8** | 0.000 0 | 0.255 3 |
册亨 CH | 0.489 1ns | 0.447 6ns | 0.453 5ns | 0.567 6ns | 0.531 6ns | 0.581 6ns | 0.492 7ns | 0.494 8ns | 0.000 0 |
Table 7 Gene flow value (upper triangle) and gene differentiation coefficient value (lower triangle) among populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens
居群 Population | 宜丰 YF | 泾县 JX | 仙居 XJ | 遂昌 SC | 元谋 YM | 宾川 BC | 武定 WD | 师宗 SZ | 册亨 CH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宜丰 YF | 0.000 0 | 0.617 8 | 1.442 6 | 0.547 7 | 0.754 4 | 0.650 9 | 46.046 3 | 12.440 4 | 0.261 1 |
泾县 JX | 0.288 1** | 0.000 0 | 0.869 1 | 0.649 9 | 0.650 9 | 0.567 3 | 0.638 1 | 0.691 3 | 0.308 5 |
仙居 XJ | 0.147 7 ns | 0.223 4** | 0.000 0 | 0.988 9 | 1.471 8 | 1.013 9 | 1.311 5 | 2.124 2 | 0.301 3 |
遂昌 SC | 0.313 4 ns | 0.277 8** | 0.201 8** | 0.000 0 | 11.769 2 | 3.902 8 | 0.474 0 | 0.662 7 | 0.190 5 |
元谋 YM | 0.248 9** | 0.277 5** | 0.145 2** | 0.020 8** | 0.000 0 | 7.866 9 | 0.666 4 | 0.964 8 | 0.220 3 |
宾川 BC | 0.277 5** | 0.305 9** | 0.197 8** | 0.060 2** | 0.030 8** | 0.000 0 | 0.587 2 | 0.702 7 | 0.179 8 |
武定 WD | 0.005 4** | 0.281 5** | 0.160 1** | 0.345 3** | 0.272 8** | 0.298 6** | 0.000 0 | 4.770 1 | 0.257 4 |
师宗 SZ | 0.019 7** | 0.265 6** | 0.105 3** | 0.273 9** | 0.205 8** | 0.262 4** | 0.049 8** | 0.000 0 | 0.255 3 |
册亨 CH | 0.489 1ns | 0.447 6ns | 0.453 5ns | 0.567 6ns | 0.531 6ns | 0.581 6ns | 0.492 7ns | 0.494 8ns | 0.000 0 |
居群 Population | 宜丰 YF | 泾县 JX | 仙居 XJ | 遂昌 SC | 元谋 YM | 宾川 BC | 武定 WD | 师宗 SZ | 册亨 CH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宜丰 YF | 0.000 0 | 466.550 4 | 669.412 6 | 522.624 5 | 1 582.353 6 | 1 438.120 4 | 1 371.050 3 | 1 220.404 2 | 1 000.213 6 |
泾县 JX | 0.545 8 | 0.000 0 | 237.553 6 | 123.765 5 | 2 042.560 1 | 1 898.927 0 | 1 831.920 9 | 1 683.540 6 | 1 464.721 7 |
仙居 XJ | 0.251 9 | 0.674 2 | 0.000 0 | 146.794 0 | 2 251.480 5 | 2 107.132 3 | 2 040.069 9 | 1 888.425 4 | 1 667.240 1 |
遂昌 SC | 0.508 1 | 0.390 0 | 0.460 7 | 0.000 0 | 2 104.708 5 | 1 960.372 6 | 1 893.308 7 | 1 741.786 6 | 1 520.714 2 |
元谋 YM | 0.480 5 | 0.340 3 | 0.439 2 | 0.071 0 | 0.000 0 | 144.614 4 | 211.546 0 | 367.289 9 | 589.458 9 |
宾川 BC | 0.524 9 | 0.364 8 | 0.395 1 | 0.140 2 | 0.074 1 | 0.000 0 | 67.070 2 | 223.452 1 | 445.148 1 |
武定 WD | 0.013 4 | 0.514 3 | 0.316 2 | 0.538 1 | 0.513 9 | 0.554 7 | 0.000 0 | 158.489 4 | 378.991 6 |
师宗 SZ | 0.046 1 | 0.631 1 | 0.220 6 | 0.501 9 | 0.475 3 | 0.548 4 | 0.092 2 | 0.000 0 | 222.460 2 |
册亨 CH | 0.747 4 | 0.748 9 | 0.791 5 | 0.913 6 | 0.896 5 | 0.957 0 | 0.753 2 | 0.731 2 | 0.000 0 |
Table 8 Genetic distance (lower triangle) and geographic distance (upper triangle) between natural populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens
居群 Population | 宜丰 YF | 泾县 JX | 仙居 XJ | 遂昌 SC | 元谋 YM | 宾川 BC | 武定 WD | 师宗 SZ | 册亨 CH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
宜丰 YF | 0.000 0 | 466.550 4 | 669.412 6 | 522.624 5 | 1 582.353 6 | 1 438.120 4 | 1 371.050 3 | 1 220.404 2 | 1 000.213 6 |
泾县 JX | 0.545 8 | 0.000 0 | 237.553 6 | 123.765 5 | 2 042.560 1 | 1 898.927 0 | 1 831.920 9 | 1 683.540 6 | 1 464.721 7 |
仙居 XJ | 0.251 9 | 0.674 2 | 0.000 0 | 146.794 0 | 2 251.480 5 | 2 107.132 3 | 2 040.069 9 | 1 888.425 4 | 1 667.240 1 |
遂昌 SC | 0.508 1 | 0.390 0 | 0.460 7 | 0.000 0 | 2 104.708 5 | 1 960.372 6 | 1 893.308 7 | 1 741.786 6 | 1 520.714 2 |
元谋 YM | 0.480 5 | 0.340 3 | 0.439 2 | 0.071 0 | 0.000 0 | 144.614 4 | 211.546 0 | 367.289 9 | 589.458 9 |
宾川 BC | 0.524 9 | 0.364 8 | 0.395 1 | 0.140 2 | 0.074 1 | 0.000 0 | 67.070 2 | 223.452 1 | 445.148 1 |
武定 WD | 0.013 4 | 0.514 3 | 0.316 2 | 0.538 1 | 0.513 9 | 0.554 7 | 0.000 0 | 158.489 4 | 378.991 6 |
师宗 SZ | 0.046 1 | 0.631 1 | 0.220 6 | 0.501 9 | 0.475 3 | 0.548 4 | 0.092 2 | 0.000 0 | 222.460 2 |
册亨 CH | 0.747 4 | 0.748 9 | 0.791 5 | 0.913 6 | 0.896 5 | 0.957 0 | 0.753 2 | 0.731 2 | 0.000 0 |
[1] | Baranek M, Kadlec M, Raddová J, Vachůn M, Pidra M (2001). Evalutation of RAPD data by POPGENE 32 software. Proceedings of 9th International Conference of Horticulture, September 3th-6th Lednice, Czech Republic, 2, 465-472. |
[2] |
Channell R, Lomolino MV (2000). Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species. Nature, 403, 84-86.
DOI URL PMID |
[3] | Coates DJ (2000). Defining conservation units in a rich and fragmented flora: implications for the management of genetic resources and evolutionary processes in south- west Australian plants. Australian Journal of Botany, 48, 329-339. |
[4] |
Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC (2008). Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central- marginal hypothesis and beyond. Molecular Ecology, 17, 1170-1188.
DOI URL PMID |
[5] |
Eckstein RL, O’Neill RA, Danihelka J, Otte A, Köhler W (2006). Genetic structure among and within peripheral and central populations of three endangered floodplain violets. Molecular Ecology, 15, 2367-2379.
DOI URL PMID |
[6] |
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010). Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 564-567.
URL PMID |
[7] | Gapare WJ, Aitken SN, Ritland CE (2005). Genetic diversity of core and peripheral Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis(Bong.) Carr) populations: implications for conservation of widespread species. Biological Conservation, 123, 113-123. |
[8] | Goverde M, Schweier K, Baur B, Erhardt A (2002). Small- scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslands. Biological Conservation, 104, 293-299. |
[9] | Groom MJ (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist, 111, 1169-1194. |
[10] |
Guries RP, Ledig FT (1982). Genetic diversity and population structure in pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.). Evolution, 36, 387-402.
URL PMID |
[11] | Hamann A, El-Kassaby YA, Koshy MP, Namkoong G (1998). Multivariate analysis of allozymic and quantitative trait variation in (Alnus rubra Bong.): geographic patterns and evolutionary implication. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 10, 1557-1565. |
[12] |
Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005). Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecology Letters, 8, 461-467.
DOI URL PMID |
[13] | Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Murawski DA, Loveless MD (1991). Correlation between species traits and allozyme diversity: implication for conservation biology. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE eds. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford University Press, New York. |
[14] |
Huang ZH, Liu NF, Zhou TL (2005). A comparative study of genetic diversity of peripheral and central populations of Chukar partridge from northwestern China. Biochemical Genetics, 43, 613-621.
DOI URL PMID |
[15] |
Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V (2002). Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. The American Naturalist, 159, S22-S35.
URL PMID |
[16] | Lammi A, Siikamaki P, Mustajarvi K (1999). Genetic diversity, population size and fitness in central and peripheral populations of a rare plant Lychnis viscaria. Conservation Biology, 13, 1069-1078. |
[17] | Ledig FT (1986). Conservation strategies for forest gene resources. Forest Ecology and Management, 14, 77-90. |
[18] | Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1995). When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology, 9, 753-760. |
[19] |
Li L, Sun ZX, Yang SD, Chang LR, Yang LH (2006). Analysis of genetic variation of Abalone (Haliotis discus hannal) populations with microsatellite markers. Hereditas, 28, 1549-1554. (in Chinese with English abstract)
URL PMID |
[ 李莉, 孙振兴, 杨树德, 常林瑞, 杨立红 (2006). 用微卫星标记分析皱纹盘鲍群体的遗传变异. 遗传, 28, 1549-1554.]
PMID |
|
[20] | Liu J, Chen YT, Sun ZX, Jiang JM, He GP, Rao LB, Wu TL (2008). Spatial genetic structure of Toona ciliata var. pubescens populations in terms of spatial autocorrelation analysis. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 44(6), 53-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘军, 陈益泰, 孙宗修, 姜景民, 何贵平, 饶龙兵, 吴天林 (2008). 基于空间自相关分析研究毛红椿天然居群的空间遗传结构. 林业科学, 44(6), 53-59.] | |
[21] | Liu J, Sun ZX, Chen YT, He GP, Wu TL (2006). Isolation of microsatellite DNA from endangered tree species Toona ciliata var. pubescens and optimization of SSR reaction system. China Biotechnology, 26(12), 50-55. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘军, 孙宗修, 陈益泰, 何贵平, 吴天林 (2006). 珍稀濒危树种毛红椿微卫星DNA分离及SSR反应体系优化. 中国生物工程杂志, 26(12), 50-55.] | |
[22] | Marshall DR, Brown ADH (1975). Optimum sampling strategies for gene conservation. In: Frankel OH, Hawkes JG eds. Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 53-80. |
[23] | Matsumura C, Washitani I (2000). Effects of population size and pollinator limitation on seed-set of Primula sieboldii populations in a fragmented landscape. Ecological Research, 15, 307-322. |
[24] | Mayr E (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. |
[25] | Miller MP (1997). Tools for Population Genetic Analysis(TFPGA) version 1.3. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff. |
[26] |
Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakrorty R (1975). The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1-10.
DOI URL PMID |
[27] | Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006). GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288-295. |
[28] |
Takezakin N, Nei M (1996). Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics, 144, 389-399.
URL PMID |
[29] |
Thomas CD, Bodsworth EJ, Wilson RJ, Simmons AD, Davies ZG, Musche M, Conradt L (2001). Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature, 411, 577-581.
DOI URL PMID |
[30] | van Rossum F, Vekemans X, Gratia E, Meerts P (2003). A comparative study of allozyme variation of peripheral and central populations of Silene nutans L.(Caryophyllaceae) from Western Europe: implications for conservation. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 242, 49-61. |
[31] | Wang YQ, Zhang ZB, Xu LX (2002). The genetic diversity of central and peripheral populations of ratlike hamster (Cricetulus triton). Chinese Science Bulletin, 47, 201-206. |
[32] | White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007). Forest Genetics. CABI Publishing, New York. 259-284. |
[33] | Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution, 19, 395-420. |
[1] | CHEN Tian-Yi, LOU An-Ru. Genetic diversity and genetic structure of the Betula platyphylla populations on the eastern side of the Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(5): 561-568. |
[2] | XU Jin-Shi,CHAI Yong-Fu,LIU Xiao,YUE Ming,GUO Yao-Xin,KANG Mu-Yi,LIU Quan-Ru,ZHENG Cheng-Yang,JI Cheng-Jun,YAN Ming,ZHANG Feng,GAO Xian-Ming,WANG Ren-Qing,SHI Fu-Chen,ZHANG Qin-Di,WANG Mao. Community assembly, diversity patterns and distributions of broad-leaved forests in North China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(9): 732-741. |
[3] | QIN Hao, ZHANG Yin-Bo, DONG Gang, ZHANG Feng. Altitudinal patterns of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of forest communities in Mount Guandi, Shanxi, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(9): 762-773. |
[4] | ZHANG Xin-Xin, WANG Xi, HU Ying, ZHOU Wei, CHEN Xiao-Yang, HU Xin-Sheng. Advances in the study of population genetic diversity at plant species’ margins [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(5): 383-395. |
[5] | CHENG Yi-Kang, ZHANG Hui, WANG Xu, LONG Wen-Xing, LI Chao, FANG Yan-Shan, FU Ming-Qi, ZHU Kong-Xin. Effects of functional diversity and phylogenetic diversity on the tropical cloud forest community assembly [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(3): 217-226. |
[6] | ZHANG Li-Wen, HAN Guang-Xuan. A review on the relationships between plant genetic diversity and ecosystem functioning [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2018, 42(10): 977-989. |
[7] | Xi-Xi WANG, Wen-Xing LONG, Xiao-Bo YANG, Meng-Hui XIONG, Yong KANG, Jin HUANG, Xu WANG, Xiao-Jiang HONG, Zhao-Li ZHOU, Yong-Quan LU, Jing FANG, Shi-Xing LI. Patterns of plant diversity within and among three tropical cloud forest communities in Hainan Island [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(5): 469-479. |
[8] | WANG Jin-Nan,CHEN Jin-Fu,Chen Wu-Sheng,Zhou Xin-Yang,XU Dong,LI Ji-Hong,QI Xiao. Population genetic diversity of wild Lycium ruthenicum in Qaidam inferred from AFLP markers [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(10): 1003-1011. |
[9] | ZHANG Wei, LUO Jian-Xun, GU Yun-Jie, HU Ting-Xing. Allozyme variation of genetic diversity in natural populations of Jatropha curcas germplasm from different areas in southwest China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(3): 330-336. |
[10] | WEI Yuan, WANG Shi-Jie, LIU Xiu-Ming, HUANG Tian-Zhi. Genetic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in karst microhabitats of Guizhou Province, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(10): 1083-1090. |
[11] | ZHANG Yun-Hong, HOU Yan, LOU An-Ru. Population genetic diversity of Rhodiola dumulosa in Northern China inferred from AFLP makers [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(9): 1084-1094. |
[12] | CHEN Ying. DETECTING EFFECT OF PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY ON SEEDLING MORTALITY IN AN EVERGREEN BROAD-LEAVED FOREST IN CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(6): 1084-1089. |
[13] | LIU Wei, WANG Xi, GAN You-Min, HUANG Lin-Kai, XIE Wen-Gang, MIAO Jia-Min. GENETIC DIVERSITY OF KOBRESIA PYGMAEA POPULATIONS ALONG A GRAZING GRADIENT [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(5): 966-973. |
[14] | CHEN Liang-Hua, HU Ting-Xing, ZHANG Fan, LI Guo-He. GENETIC DIVERSITIES OF FOUR JUGLANSPOPULATIONS REVEALED BY AFLP IN SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(6): 1362-1372. |
[15] | ZHOU Hui-Ping, CHEN Jin, ZHANG Shou-Zhou. GENETIC AND CLONAL DIVERSITY OF GLOBBA RACEMOSA, A HERB WITH A MIXED REPRODUCTIVE MODE [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(4): 751-759. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn