Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 330-336.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00330
Special Issue: 生物多样性
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Wei1,2, LUO Jian-Xun2, GU Yun-Jie2, HU Ting-Xing1,*()
Received:
2010-06-04
Accepted:
2010-11-22
Online:
2011-06-04
Published:
2011-03-02
Contact:
HU Ting-Xing
ZHANG Wei, LUO Jian-Xun, GU Yun-Jie, HU Ting-Xing. Allozyme variation of genetic diversity in natural populations of Jatropha curcas germplasm from different areas in southwest China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(3): 330-336.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00330
种群代号 Population code | 采样地 Seed collection site | 经纬度 Longitude and latitude | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 水系 River system | 家系数量 No. of families |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LS | 卢水 Lushui | 98°08′ E, 25°08′ N | 850 | 怒江 Nujiang River | 30 |
SB | 双柏 Shuangbo | 101°51′ E, 25°49′ N | 1 066 | 红河 Honghe River | 30 |
YNPE | 普洱 Puer | 100°59′ E, 22°42′ N | 1 300 | 澜沧江 Lancang River | 30 |
XSBN | 西双版纳 Xishuangbanna | 100°80′ E, 22°35′ N | 1 000 | 澜沧江 Lancang River | 30 |
PJ | 坡脚 Pojiao | 102°55′ E, 26°74′ N | 1 080 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
FY | 泸西 Luxi | 103°76′ E, 24°52′N | 1 100 | 南盘江 Nanpan River | 30 |
LB | 雷波 Leibo | 103°62′ E, 28°21′ N | 960 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
HPZ | 花棚子 Huapengzi | 101°55′ E, 26°22′ N | 983 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
HL | 会理 Huili | 101°55′ E, 26°10′ N | 943 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
YL | 金河 Jinhe | 101°51′ E, 27°42′ N | 1 200 | 雅砻江 Yagong River | 30 |
Table 1 Geographic locations and sample size of Jatropha curcas populations
种群代号 Population code | 采样地 Seed collection site | 经纬度 Longitude and latitude | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 水系 River system | 家系数量 No. of families |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LS | 卢水 Lushui | 98°08′ E, 25°08′ N | 850 | 怒江 Nujiang River | 30 |
SB | 双柏 Shuangbo | 101°51′ E, 25°49′ N | 1 066 | 红河 Honghe River | 30 |
YNPE | 普洱 Puer | 100°59′ E, 22°42′ N | 1 300 | 澜沧江 Lancang River | 30 |
XSBN | 西双版纳 Xishuangbanna | 100°80′ E, 22°35′ N | 1 000 | 澜沧江 Lancang River | 30 |
PJ | 坡脚 Pojiao | 102°55′ E, 26°74′ N | 1 080 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
FY | 泸西 Luxi | 103°76′ E, 24°52′N | 1 100 | 南盘江 Nanpan River | 30 |
LB | 雷波 Leibo | 103°62′ E, 28°21′ N | 960 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
HPZ | 花棚子 Huapengzi | 101°55′ E, 26°22′ N | 983 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
HL | 会理 Huili | 101°55′ E, 26°10′ N | 943 | 金沙江 Jinsha River | 30 |
YL | 金河 Jinhe | 101°51′ E, 27°42′ N | 1 200 | 雅砻江 Yagong River | 30 |
酶系统 Enzyme system | 缩写 Abbreviation | 标准代号 EC No. | 位点数 No. of loci |
---|---|---|---|
谷草转氨酶 Glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase | GOT | (E.C.2.6.1.1) | 2 |
莽草酸脱氢酶 Shikimate acid dehydrogenase | SHDH | (E.C.1.1.1.25) | 1 |
6-磷酸葡萄糖脱氢酶 Phosphoglucose dehydrogenase | 6PGD | (E.C 1.1.1.44) | 2 |
丙氨酸氨基肽酶 Alanine aminopeptidase | AAP | (E.C.3.4.11. I) | 2 |
磷酸葡萄糖变位酶 Phosphogluco mutase | PGM | (E.C.5.4.2.23) | 3 |
磷酸葡萄糖异构酶 Phosphogluco isomerase | PGI | (E.C.5.3.1.9) | 4 |
甲基萘醌还原酶 Menadione reductase | MNR | (E.C.1.6.99.2) | 7 |
Table 2 Seven enzyme systems assayed and No. of loci detected in each enzyme system
酶系统 Enzyme system | 缩写 Abbreviation | 标准代号 EC No. | 位点数 No. of loci |
---|---|---|---|
谷草转氨酶 Glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase | GOT | (E.C.2.6.1.1) | 2 |
莽草酸脱氢酶 Shikimate acid dehydrogenase | SHDH | (E.C.1.1.1.25) | 1 |
6-磷酸葡萄糖脱氢酶 Phosphoglucose dehydrogenase | 6PGD | (E.C 1.1.1.44) | 2 |
丙氨酸氨基肽酶 Alanine aminopeptidase | AAP | (E.C.3.4.11. I) | 2 |
磷酸葡萄糖变位酶 Phosphogluco mutase | PGM | (E.C.5.4.2.23) | 3 |
磷酸葡萄糖异构酶 Phosphogluco isomerase | PGI | (E.C.5.3.1.9) | 4 |
甲基萘醌还原酶 Menadione reductase | MNR | (E.C.1.6.99.2) | 7 |
位点 Locus | 等位基因 Allele | 种群 Population | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
金河 YL | 坡脚 PJ | 花棚子 HPZ | 雷波 LB | 法依 FY | 双柏 SB | 版纳 XSBN | 普洱 YNPE | 会理 HL | 卢水 LS | 平均 Mean | ||
AAP-1 | A | 0.725 | 0.675 | 0.650 | 0.750 | 0500 | 0.675 | 0.600 | 0.750 | 0.550 | 0.650 | 0.652 |
B | 0.275 | 0.325 | 0.350 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.325 | 0.400 | 0.250 | 0.450 | 0.350 | 0.348 | |
SHDH | A | 0.300 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.775 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.525 | 0.325 | 0.487 |
B | 0.675 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.175 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.675 | 0.467 | |
C | 0.025 | 0.150 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.045 | |
GOT-2 | A | 0.425 | 0.375 | 0.325 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.325 | 0.275 | 0.347 |
B | 0.575 | 0.625 | 0.675 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.625 | 0.725 | 0.647 | |
PGI-4 | A | 0.625 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.550 | 0.475 | 0.525 | 0.575 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.550 | 0.530 |
B | 0.375 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.375 | 0.475 | 0.350 | 0.425 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.450 | 0.440 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.075 | 0.050 | 0.125 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.030 | |
6PGD-1 | A | 1.000 | 0.600 | 0.700 | 0.875 | 0.875 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.800 | 0.750 | 1.000 | 0.800 |
B | 0.000 | 0.400 | 0.300 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.250 | 0.350 | 0.200 | 0.250 | 0.000 | 0.200 | |
MNR-3 | A | 0. 250 | 0.175 | 0.175 | 0.200 | 0.175 | 0.150 | 0.200 | 0.275 | 0.250 | 0.175 | 0.177 |
B | 0.750 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.800 | 0.825 | 0.850 | 0.800 | 0.725 | 0.750 | 0.825 | 0.797 | |
PGM-2 | A | 0.700 | 0.875 | 0.850 | 0.700 | 0.825 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.625 | 0.575 | 0.675 | 0.718 |
B | 0.300 | 0.125 | 0.150 | 0.300 | 0.175 | 0.325 | 0.300 | 0.375 | 0.425 | 0.325 | 0.280 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
基因频率平均值 Mean value of gene frequency | 0.397 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.409 | 0.412 | 0.410 | |
等位基因数 Number of alleles | 14 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 14.9 |
Table 3 Allele frequencies in ten natural populations of Jatropha curcas
位点 Locus | 等位基因 Allele | 种群 Population | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
金河 YL | 坡脚 PJ | 花棚子 HPZ | 雷波 LB | 法依 FY | 双柏 SB | 版纳 XSBN | 普洱 YNPE | 会理 HL | 卢水 LS | 平均 Mean | ||
AAP-1 | A | 0.725 | 0.675 | 0.650 | 0.750 | 0500 | 0.675 | 0.600 | 0.750 | 0.550 | 0.650 | 0.652 |
B | 0.275 | 0.325 | 0.350 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.325 | 0.400 | 0.250 | 0.450 | 0.350 | 0.348 | |
SHDH | A | 0.300 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.775 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.525 | 0.325 | 0.487 |
B | 0.675 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.175 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.675 | 0.467 | |
C | 0.025 | 0.150 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.045 | |
GOT-2 | A | 0.425 | 0.375 | 0.325 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.325 | 0.275 | 0.347 |
B | 0.575 | 0.625 | 0.675 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.625 | 0.725 | 0.647 | |
PGI-4 | A | 0.625 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.550 | 0.475 | 0.525 | 0.575 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.550 | 0.530 |
B | 0.375 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.375 | 0.475 | 0.350 | 0.425 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.450 | 0.440 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.075 | 0.050 | 0.125 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.030 | |
6PGD-1 | A | 1.000 | 0.600 | 0.700 | 0.875 | 0.875 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.800 | 0.750 | 1.000 | 0.800 |
B | 0.000 | 0.400 | 0.300 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.250 | 0.350 | 0.200 | 0.250 | 0.000 | 0.200 | |
MNR-3 | A | 0. 250 | 0.175 | 0.175 | 0.200 | 0.175 | 0.150 | 0.200 | 0.275 | 0.250 | 0.175 | 0.177 |
B | 0.750 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.800 | 0.825 | 0.850 | 0.800 | 0.725 | 0.750 | 0.825 | 0.797 | |
PGM-2 | A | 0.700 | 0.875 | 0.850 | 0.700 | 0.825 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.625 | 0.575 | 0.675 | 0.718 |
B | 0.300 | 0.125 | 0.150 | 0.300 | 0.175 | 0.325 | 0.300 | 0.375 | 0.425 | 0.325 | 0.280 | |
C | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
基因频率平均值 Mean value of gene frequency | 0.397 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.412 | 0.409 | 0.412 | 0.410 | |
等位基因数 Number of alleles | 14 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 14.9 |
种群 Population | 个体 Individual | 等位基因数 Number of alleles | 多态位点百分率 P | Shannon信息指数 I | 观测杂合度 Ho | 期望杂合度 He |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LS | 30 | 2.0 (0.2) | 85.7 | 0.546 2 | 0.493 (0.092) | 0.382 (0.065) |
SB | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.642 5 | 0.600 (0.080) | 0.440 (0.051) |
YNPE | 30 | 2.3 (0.2) | 100.0 | 0.665 8 | 0.600 (0.076) | 0.443 (0.050) |
XSBN | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.608 8 | 0.564 (0.090) | 0.413 (0.043) |
PJ | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.596 4 | 0.529 (0.091) | 0.407 (0.050) |
FY | 30 | 2.4 (0.2) | 100.0 | 0.659 8 | 0.550 (0.089) | 0.432 (0.040) |
LB | 30 | 2.0 ( 0.0) | 100.0 | 0.628 2 | 0.679 (0.060) | 0.449 (0.023) |
HPZ | 30 | 2.0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.624 5 | 0.629 (0.055) | 0.446 (0.027) |
HL | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.662 0 | 0.679 (0.068) | 0.472 (0.023) |
YL | 30 | 1.9 ( 0.1) | 85.7 | 0.521 2 | 0.471 (0.091) | 0.368 (0.066) |
平均 | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 97.1 | 0.615 5 | 0.579 (0.079) | 0.425 (0.043) |
Table 4 Genetic diversity in ten natural populations of Jatropha curcas
种群 Population | 个体 Individual | 等位基因数 Number of alleles | 多态位点百分率 P | Shannon信息指数 I | 观测杂合度 Ho | 期望杂合度 He |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LS | 30 | 2.0 (0.2) | 85.7 | 0.546 2 | 0.493 (0.092) | 0.382 (0.065) |
SB | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.642 5 | 0.600 (0.080) | 0.440 (0.051) |
YNPE | 30 | 2.3 (0.2) | 100.0 | 0.665 8 | 0.600 (0.076) | 0.443 (0.050) |
XSBN | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.608 8 | 0.564 (0.090) | 0.413 (0.043) |
PJ | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.596 4 | 0.529 (0.091) | 0.407 (0.050) |
FY | 30 | 2.4 (0.2) | 100.0 | 0.659 8 | 0.550 (0.089) | 0.432 (0.040) |
LB | 30 | 2.0 ( 0.0) | 100.0 | 0.628 2 | 0.679 (0.060) | 0.449 (0.023) |
HPZ | 30 | 2.0 (0.0) | 100.0 | 0.624 5 | 0.629 (0.055) | 0.446 (0.027) |
HL | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 100.0 | 0.662 0 | 0.679 (0.068) | 0.472 (0.023) |
YL | 30 | 1.9 ( 0.1) | 85.7 | 0.521 2 | 0.471 (0.091) | 0.368 (0.066) |
平均 | 30 | 2.1 (0.1) | 97.1 | 0.615 5 | 0.579 (0.079) | 0.425 (0.043) |
位点 Locus | 杂合度 Heterozygosity | 种群 Population | 平均值 Mean | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
金河 YL | 坡脚 PJ | 花棚子 HPZ | 雷波 LB | 法依 FY | 双柏 SB | 版纳 XSBN | 普洱 YNPE | 会理 HL | 卢水 LS | |||
AAP-1 | Ho | 0.450 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.350 | 0.200 | 0.500 | 0.100 | 0.400 | 0.355 |
He | 0.550 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.500 | 0.600 | 0.650 | 0.800 | 0.500 | 0.900 | 0.600 | 0.645 | |
SHDH | Ho | 0.600 | 0.300 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.550 | 0.200 | 0.300 | 0.150 | 0.550 | 0.325 |
He | 0.400 | 0.700 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 0.450 | 0.800 | 0.700 | 0.850 | 0.450 | 0.675 | |
GOT-2 | Ho | 0.350 | 0.250 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.200 | 0.250 | 0.450 | 0.315 |
He | 0.650 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 0.750 | 0.550 | 0.685 | |
PGI-4 | Ho | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.200 | 0.100 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.150 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.265 |
He | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.050 | 0.950 | 0.850 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.710 | |
6PGD-1 | Ho | 1.000 | 0.200 | 0.400 | 0.750 | 0.750 | 0.500 | 0.300 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 1.000 | 0.600 |
He | 0.000 | 0.800 | 0.600 | 0.250 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.700 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.000 | 0.400 | |
MNR-3 | Ho | 0.500 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.600 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.450 | 0.600 | 0.650 | 0.605 |
He | 0.500 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.400 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.550 | 0.400 | 0.350 | 0.395 | |
PGM-2 | Ho | 0.400 | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.400 | 0.250 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.525 |
He | 0.600 | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.600 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.475 | |
平均值 Mean | Ho | 0.507 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.436 | 0.471 | 0.514 | 0.321 | 0.371 | 0.321 | 0.528 | 0.427 |
He | 0.493 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.564 | 0.429 | 0.550 | 0.679 | 0.628 | 0.678 | 0.471 | 0.569 |
Table 5 Observed heterozygosity at single locus detected in ten populations of Jatropha curcas
位点 Locus | 杂合度 Heterozygosity | 种群 Population | 平均值 Mean | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
金河 YL | 坡脚 PJ | 花棚子 HPZ | 雷波 LB | 法依 FY | 双柏 SB | 版纳 XSBN | 普洱 YNPE | 会理 HL | 卢水 LS | |||
AAP-1 | Ho | 0.450 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.350 | 0.200 | 0.500 | 0.100 | 0.400 | 0.355 |
He | 0.550 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.500 | 0.600 | 0.650 | 0.800 | 0.500 | 0.900 | 0.600 | 0.645 | |
SHDH | Ho | 0.600 | 0.300 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.550 | 0.200 | 0.300 | 0.150 | 0.550 | 0.325 |
He | 0.400 | 0.700 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 0.450 | 0.800 | 0.700 | 0.850 | 0.450 | 0.675 | |
GOT-2 | Ho | 0.350 | 0.250 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.200 | 0.250 | 0.450 | 0.315 |
He | 0.650 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 0.750 | 0.550 | 0.685 | |
PGI-4 | Ho | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.200 | 0.100 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.150 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.300 | 0.265 |
He | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.050 | 0.950 | 0.850 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.710 | |
6PGD-1 | Ho | 1.000 | 0.200 | 0.400 | 0.750 | 0.750 | 0.500 | 0.300 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 1.000 | 0.600 |
He | 0.000 | 0.800 | 0.600 | 0.250 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.700 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.000 | 0.400 | |
MNR-3 | Ho | 0.500 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.600 | 0.650 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.450 | 0.600 | 0.650 | 0.605 |
He | 0.500 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.400 | 0.350 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.550 | 0.400 | 0.350 | 0.395 | |
PGM-2 | Ho | 0.400 | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.400 | 0.250 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.525 |
He | 0.600 | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.250 | 0.300 | 0.600 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.475 | |
平均值 Mean | Ho | 0.507 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.436 | 0.471 | 0.514 | 0.321 | 0.371 | 0.321 | 0.528 | 0.427 |
He | 0.493 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.564 | 0.429 | 0.550 | 0.679 | 0.628 | 0.678 | 0.471 | 0.569 |
位点 Locus | Fis | Fit | Fst | Nm |
---|---|---|---|---|
AAP-1 | -0.462 2 | -0.422 3 | 0.027 3 | 8.920 6 |
SHDH | -0.365 0 | -0.245 9 | 0.087 2 | 2.615 7 |
GOT-2 | -0.512 6 | -0.500 6 | 0.007 9 | 31.340 8 |
PGI-4 | -0.506 9 | -0.486 8 | 0.013 3 | 18.552 9 |
6PGD-1 | -0.397 4 | -0.250 0 | 0.105 5 | 2.120 4 |
MNR-3 | -0.234 9 | -0.223 0 | 0.009 6 | 25.692 8 |
PGM-2 | -0.221 1 | -0.167 7 | 0.043 7 | 5.467 3 |
Mean | -0.397 7 | -0.340 0 | 0.041 3 | 5.808 9 |
Table 6 Estimated F-statistics and gene flow in natural population of Jatropha curcas
位点 Locus | Fis | Fit | Fst | Nm |
---|---|---|---|---|
AAP-1 | -0.462 2 | -0.422 3 | 0.027 3 | 8.920 6 |
SHDH | -0.365 0 | -0.245 9 | 0.087 2 | 2.615 7 |
GOT-2 | -0.512 6 | -0.500 6 | 0.007 9 | 31.340 8 |
PGI-4 | -0.506 9 | -0.486 8 | 0.013 3 | 18.552 9 |
6PGD-1 | -0.397 4 | -0.250 0 | 0.105 5 | 2.120 4 |
MNR-3 | -0.234 9 | -0.223 0 | 0.009 6 | 25.692 8 |
PGM-2 | -0.221 1 | -0.167 7 | 0.043 7 | 5.467 3 |
Mean | -0.397 7 | -0.340 0 | 0.041 3 | 5.808 9 |
种群代号 Population code | YL | PJ | HPZ | LB | FY | SB | XSBN | YNPE | HL | LS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YL | **** | 0.943 6 | 0.956 1 | 0.973 9 | 0.955 2 | 0.921 7 | 0.943 4 | 0.977 7 | 0.961 7 | 0.990 9 |
PJ | 0.058 1 | **** | 0.995 3 | 0.958 1 | 0.961 7 | 0.941 2 | 0.975 3 | 0.964 5 | 0.959 1 | 0.945 0 |
HPZ | 0.044 9 | 0.004 7 | **** | 0.964 1 | 0.969 9 | 0.941 8 | 0.972 1 | 0.967 6 | 0.962 8 | 0.962 4 |
LB | 0.026 4 | 0.042 8 | 0.036 5 | **** | 0.979 3 | 0.983 3 | 0.980 7 | 0.990 2 | 0.980 0 | 0.974 3 |
FY | 0.045 8 | 0.039 0 | 0.030 5 | 0.020 9 | **** | 0.969 4 | 0.979 3 | 0.968 1 | 0.977 6 | 0.966 8 |
SB | 0.081 5 | 0.060 6 | 0.059 9 | 0.016 9 | 0.031 1 | **** | 0.981 0 | 0.965 3 | 0.970 7 | 0.928 4 |
XSBN | 0.058 3 | 0.025 0 | 0.028 3 | 0.019 5 | 0.020 9 | 0.019 2 | **** | 0.979 3 | 0.989 5 | 0.953 8 |
YNPE | 0.022 6 | 0.036 1 | 0.033 0 | 0.009 8 | 0.032 4 | 0.035 3 | 0.021 0 | **** | 0.987 2 | 0.975 6 |
HL | 0.039 0 | 0.041 8 | 0.037 9 | 0.020 2 | 0.022 7 | 0.029 7 | 0.010 5 | 0.012 9 | **** | 0.968 7 |
LS | 0.009 1 | 0.056 6 | 0.038 3 | 0.026 0 | 0.033 7 | 0.074 3 | 0.047 3 | 0.024 8 | 0.031 8 | **** |
Table 7 Genetic distances (below diagonal) and genetic identities (above diagonal) among populations of Jatropha curcas (Nei, 1978)
种群代号 Population code | YL | PJ | HPZ | LB | FY | SB | XSBN | YNPE | HL | LS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YL | **** | 0.943 6 | 0.956 1 | 0.973 9 | 0.955 2 | 0.921 7 | 0.943 4 | 0.977 7 | 0.961 7 | 0.990 9 |
PJ | 0.058 1 | **** | 0.995 3 | 0.958 1 | 0.961 7 | 0.941 2 | 0.975 3 | 0.964 5 | 0.959 1 | 0.945 0 |
HPZ | 0.044 9 | 0.004 7 | **** | 0.964 1 | 0.969 9 | 0.941 8 | 0.972 1 | 0.967 6 | 0.962 8 | 0.962 4 |
LB | 0.026 4 | 0.042 8 | 0.036 5 | **** | 0.979 3 | 0.983 3 | 0.980 7 | 0.990 2 | 0.980 0 | 0.974 3 |
FY | 0.045 8 | 0.039 0 | 0.030 5 | 0.020 9 | **** | 0.969 4 | 0.979 3 | 0.968 1 | 0.977 6 | 0.966 8 |
SB | 0.081 5 | 0.060 6 | 0.059 9 | 0.016 9 | 0.031 1 | **** | 0.981 0 | 0.965 3 | 0.970 7 | 0.928 4 |
XSBN | 0.058 3 | 0.025 0 | 0.028 3 | 0.019 5 | 0.020 9 | 0.019 2 | **** | 0.979 3 | 0.989 5 | 0.953 8 |
YNPE | 0.022 6 | 0.036 1 | 0.033 0 | 0.009 8 | 0.032 4 | 0.035 3 | 0.021 0 | **** | 0.987 2 | 0.975 6 |
HL | 0.039 0 | 0.041 8 | 0.037 9 | 0.020 2 | 0.022 7 | 0.029 7 | 0.010 5 | 0.012 9 | **** | 0.968 7 |
LS | 0.009 1 | 0.056 6 | 0.038 3 | 0.026 0 | 0.033 7 | 0.074 3 | 0.047 3 | 0.024 8 | 0.031 8 | **** |
[1] |
Basha SD, Francis G, Makkar HPS, Becker K, Sujatha M (2009). A comparative study of biochemical traits and molecular markers for assessment of genetic relationships between Jatropha curcas L. germplasm from different countries. Plant Science, 176, 812-823.
DOI URL |
[2] | Chen SY (陈少瑜), Wu LY (吴丽圆), Li JW (李江文), Xiang W (项伟), Zhou Y (周云) (2001). Study on genetic diversity of natural population of Taxus yunanensis. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 37(5), 41-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Ge S (葛颂) (1989). Quantitative analysis of tree population variation by allozyme and analysis method. Journal of Southwest Forestry College (西南林学院学报), 9(1), 84-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Gu YJ (辜云杰), He CJ (何朝军), Zhang J (张俊), He SB (何绍彬), Zhang W (张炜), Luo JX (罗建勋) (2009). Study on phenotypic diversity of Jatropha curas seeds from natural population in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture. Journal of Southwest Forestry College (西南林学院学报), 29(6), 11-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1989). Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS eds. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Germplasm Resources. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. 43-63. |
[6] |
Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Bmyles SL (1992). Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests, 6, 95-124.
DOI URL |
[7] | He W (何玮), Guo L (郭亮), Wang L (王岚), Yang W (杨威), Tang L (唐琳), Chen F (陈放) (2007). ISSR analysis of genetic diversity of Jatropha curcas L. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology (应用与环境生物学报), 13, 466-470. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Kaushik N, Kumar K, Kumar S, Kaushik N, Roy S (2007). Genetic variability and divergence studies in seed traits and oil content of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) accessions. Biomass & Bioenergy, 31, 497-502. |
[9] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Gu YJ (辜云杰), Tang P (唐平), He XF (和献峰), Peng JY (彭建勇), Zhang W (张炜) (2009). Jatropha curcas populations in west Panzhihua area. Journal of Southwest Forestry College (西南林学院学报), 29(3), 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Luo JX (罗建勋), He XF (和献峰), Gu YJ (辜云杰), Tang P (唐平), Cao XJ (曹小军), Yang PJ (杨培金) (2008). Study on phenotypic diversity of natural populations of Jatropha curcas in Panzhihua area, Sichuan Province. Journal of Southwest Forestry College (西南林学院学报), 28(6), 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] |
Nei M (1972). Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist, 6, 283-293.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89, 583-590.
URL PMID |
[13] | Ou WJ (欧文军), Wang WQ (王文泉), Li KM (李开绵) (2009). Molecular genetic diversity analysis of 120 accessions of Jatropha curcas L. germplasm. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops (热带作物学报), 30, 284-292. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] |
Soltis DE, Haufler CH, Darow DC, Gastony GJ (1983). Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal, 73, 9-27.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Swofford DL, Selander RB (1989). BIOSIS-1, a computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Journal of Heredity, 72, 281-283.
DOI URL |
[16] |
Tatikonda L, Wani SP, Kannan S, Beerelli N, Sreedevi TK, Hoisington DA, Devi P, Varshney RK (2009). AFLP- based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Science, 176, 505-513.
DOI URL PMID |
[17] | Wang ZR (王中仁) 1996. Plant Allozyme Analysis 植物等位酶分析. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[18] | Wendel JF, Weeden NF (1989). Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS eds. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Dioscordes Press, Portland. 5-44. |
[19] | Xiang ZY (向振勇), Song SQ (宋松泉), Wang GJ (王桂娟), Chen MS (陈茂盛), Yang CY (杨成源), Long CL (龙春林) (2007). Genetic diversity of Jatropha curcas (Euphorbiaceae) collected from southern Yunnan, detected by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR). Acta Botanica Yunnanic (云南植物研究), 29, 619-624. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle T (1997). POPGENE, Version 1.32 Edition. Software Microsoft Window-Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. |
[1] | CHEN Tian-Yi, LOU An-Ru. Genetic diversity and genetic structure of the Betula platyphylla populations on the eastern side of the Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(5): 561-568. |
[2] | XU Jin-Shi,CHAI Yong-Fu,LIU Xiao,YUE Ming,GUO Yao-Xin,KANG Mu-Yi,LIU Quan-Ru,ZHENG Cheng-Yang,JI Cheng-Jun,YAN Ming,ZHANG Feng,GAO Xian-Ming,WANG Ren-Qing,SHI Fu-Chen,ZHANG Qin-Di,WANG Mao. Community assembly, diversity patterns and distributions of broad-leaved forests in North China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(9): 732-741. |
[3] | QIN Hao, ZHANG Yin-Bo, DONG Gang, ZHANG Feng. Altitudinal patterns of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of forest communities in Mount Guandi, Shanxi, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(9): 762-773. |
[4] | ZHANG Xin-Xin, WANG Xi, HU Ying, ZHOU Wei, CHEN Xiao-Yang, HU Xin-Sheng. Advances in the study of population genetic diversity at plant species’ margins [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(5): 383-395. |
[5] | CHENG Yi-Kang, ZHANG Hui, WANG Xu, LONG Wen-Xing, LI Chao, FANG Yan-Shan, FU Ming-Qi, ZHU Kong-Xin. Effects of functional diversity and phylogenetic diversity on the tropical cloud forest community assembly [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(3): 217-226. |
[6] | ZHANG Li-Wen, HAN Guang-Xuan. A review on the relationships between plant genetic diversity and ecosystem functioning [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2018, 42(10): 977-989. |
[7] | Xi-Xi WANG, Wen-Xing LONG, Xiao-Bo YANG, Meng-Hui XIONG, Yong KANG, Jin HUANG, Xu WANG, Xiao-Jiang HONG, Zhao-Li ZHOU, Yong-Quan LU, Jing FANG, Shi-Xing LI. Patterns of plant diversity within and among three tropical cloud forest communities in Hainan Island [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(5): 469-479. |
[8] | WANG Jin-Nan,CHEN Jin-Fu,Chen Wu-Sheng,Zhou Xin-Yang,XU Dong,LI Ji-Hong,QI Xiao. Population genetic diversity of wild Lycium ruthenicum in Qaidam inferred from AFLP markers [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(10): 1003-1011. |
[9] | LIU Jun, JIANG Jing-Min, ZOU Jun, XU Jin-Liang, SHEN Han, DIAO Song-Feng. Genetic diversity of central and peripheral populations of Toona ciliata var. pubescens, an endangered tree species endemic to China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(1): 52-60. |
[10] | WEI Yuan, WANG Shi-Jie, LIU Xiu-Ming, HUANG Tian-Zhi. Genetic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in karst microhabitats of Guizhou Province, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(10): 1083-1090. |
[11] | ZHANG Yun-Hong, HOU Yan, LOU An-Ru. Population genetic diversity of Rhodiola dumulosa in Northern China inferred from AFLP makers [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(9): 1084-1094. |
[12] | CHEN Ying. DETECTING EFFECT OF PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY ON SEEDLING MORTALITY IN AN EVERGREEN BROAD-LEAVED FOREST IN CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(6): 1084-1089. |
[13] | LIU Wei, WANG Xi, GAN You-Min, HUANG Lin-Kai, XIE Wen-Gang, MIAO Jia-Min. GENETIC DIVERSITY OF KOBRESIA PYGMAEA POPULATIONS ALONG A GRAZING GRADIENT [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(5): 966-973. |
[14] | CHEN Liang-Hua, HU Ting-Xing, ZHANG Fan, LI Guo-He. GENETIC DIVERSITIES OF FOUR JUGLANSPOPULATIONS REVEALED BY AFLP IN SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(6): 1362-1372. |
[15] | ZHOU Hui-Ping, CHEN Jin, ZHANG Shou-Zhou. GENETIC AND CLONAL DIVERSITY OF GLOBBA RACEMOSA, A HERB WITH A MIXED REPRODUCTIVE MODE [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(4): 751-759. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn