Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 203-213.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00203
Special Issue: 稳定同位素生态学
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
FAN Ting-Lu1, MA Ming-Sheng2,*(), WANG Shu-Ying2, LI Shang-Zhong2, ZHAO Gang2
Received:
2010-03-03
Accepted:
2010-06-01
Online:
2011-03-03
Published:
2011-01-21
Contact:
MA Ming-Sheng
FAN Ting-Lu, MA Ming-Sheng, WANG Shu-Ying, LI Shang-Zhong, ZHAO Gang. Stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in flag leaves of different genotypes of winter wheat and its relation to yield and water use efficiency[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(2): 203-213.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00203
品种 Variety | 遗传背景 Genetic background |
---|---|
母本×父本 Female parent × Male parent | |
‘陇鉴196’ ‘Longjian 196’ | [‘64035’ × ‘太原89’] × ‘秦麦4号’ [‘64035’ × ‘Taiyuan 89’] × ‘Qinmai 4’ |
‘陇鉴127’ ‘Longjian 127’ | [‘7402’ × ‘吕419’]F1 × ‘7415’ [‘7402’ × ‘Lü 419’]F1 × ‘7415’ |
‘陇鉴385’ ‘Longjian 385’ | ‘贵农22’ × ‘陇鉴29’ ‘Guinong 22’ × ‘Longjian 29’ |
‘陇育216’ ‘Longyu 216’ | ‘陇东3号’ × [‘82(348)’ × ‘9002-1-1’]F3 ‘Longdong 3’ × [‘82(348)’ × ‘9002-1-1’]F3 |
‘陇原061’ ‘Longyuan 061’ | ‘西峰20’ × ‘保丰6号’ ‘Xifeng 20’ × ‘Baofeng 6’ |
‘定鉴3号’ ‘Dingjian 3’ | ‘84WR(21)’ × ‘洛8912’ ‘84WR(21)’ × ‘Luo 8912’ |
‘宁麦5号’ ‘Ningmai 5 ’ | ‘XS117-0-29’ × ‘庆农3号’ ‘XS117-0-29’ × ‘Qingnong 3’ |
‘西峰27’ ‘Xifeng 27’ | ‘83183-1-3-1’ × ‘CA837’ |
‘太原10604’ ‘Taiyuan 10604’ | ‘太原610’× ‘太原851’ ‘Taiyuan 610’ × ‘Taiyuan 851’ |
‘05旱鉴27’ ‘05Hanjian 27’ | ‘京411’ × ‘鲁麦12’ ‘Jing 411’ × ‘Lumai 12’ |
‘长6878’ ‘Chang 6878’ | ‘临旱5175’ × ‘晋麦63’ ‘Linhan 5175’ × ‘Jinmai 63’ |
‘9550’ | ‘长武131’ × ‘8672-26-1’ ‘Changwu 131’ × ‘8672-26-1’ |
Table 1 The genetic background of different genotypes of winter wheat variety
品种 Variety | 遗传背景 Genetic background |
---|---|
母本×父本 Female parent × Male parent | |
‘陇鉴196’ ‘Longjian 196’ | [‘64035’ × ‘太原89’] × ‘秦麦4号’ [‘64035’ × ‘Taiyuan 89’] × ‘Qinmai 4’ |
‘陇鉴127’ ‘Longjian 127’ | [‘7402’ × ‘吕419’]F1 × ‘7415’ [‘7402’ × ‘Lü 419’]F1 × ‘7415’ |
‘陇鉴385’ ‘Longjian 385’ | ‘贵农22’ × ‘陇鉴29’ ‘Guinong 22’ × ‘Longjian 29’ |
‘陇育216’ ‘Longyu 216’ | ‘陇东3号’ × [‘82(348)’ × ‘9002-1-1’]F3 ‘Longdong 3’ × [‘82(348)’ × ‘9002-1-1’]F3 |
‘陇原061’ ‘Longyuan 061’ | ‘西峰20’ × ‘保丰6号’ ‘Xifeng 20’ × ‘Baofeng 6’ |
‘定鉴3号’ ‘Dingjian 3’ | ‘84WR(21)’ × ‘洛8912’ ‘84WR(21)’ × ‘Luo 8912’ |
‘宁麦5号’ ‘Ningmai 5 ’ | ‘XS117-0-29’ × ‘庆农3号’ ‘XS117-0-29’ × ‘Qingnong 3’ |
‘西峰27’ ‘Xifeng 27’ | ‘83183-1-3-1’ × ‘CA837’ |
‘太原10604’ ‘Taiyuan 10604’ | ‘太原610’× ‘太原851’ ‘Taiyuan 610’ × ‘Taiyuan 851’ |
‘05旱鉴27’ ‘05Hanjian 27’ | ‘京411’ × ‘鲁麦12’ ‘Jing 411’ × ‘Lumai 12’ |
‘长6878’ ‘Chang 6878’ | ‘临旱5175’ × ‘晋麦63’ ‘Linhan 5175’ × ‘Jinmai 63’ |
‘9550’ | ‘长武131’ × ‘8672-26-1’ ‘Changwu 131’ × ‘8672-26-1’ |
基因型 Genotype | δ13C值 δ13C value (‰) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE (kg·hm-2·mm-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5月6日 May 6 | 5月16日 May 16 | 5月31日 May 31 | 6月10日 June 10 | |||
‘陇鉴196’ ‘Longjian 196’ | -26.7 ± 0.11 | -26.6 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.15 | -26.2 ± 0.17 | 2 495 ± 103.37e | 11.3 ± 0.52d |
‘陇鉴127’ ‘Longjian 127’ | -26.8 ± 0.18 | -26.3 ± 0.21 | -26.3 ± 0.10 | -26.0 ± 0.19 | 1 826 ± 110.18k | 8.2 ± 0.37j |
‘陇鉴385’ ‘Longjian 385’ | -26.9 ± 0.09 | -26.8 ± 0.14 | -26.4 ± 0.14 | -26.1 ± 0.11 | 2 110 ± 89.03h | 8.8 ± 0.35i |
‘陇育216’ ‘Longyu 216’ | -26.5 ± 0.15 | -25.9 ± 0.11 | -26.0 ± 0.16 | -25.9 ± 0.15 | 2 480 ± 97.41e | 11.1 ± 0.26e |
‘陇原061’ ‘Longyuan 061’ | -25.4 ± 0.19 | -24.9 ± 0.09 | -24.8 ± 0.10 | -24.8 ± 0.13 | 2 786 ± 124.26b | 12.6 ± 0.64b |
‘定鉴3号’ ‘Dingjian 3’ | -25.0 ± 0.11 | -24.7 ± 0.21 | -24.7 ± 0.12 | -24.6 ± 0.13 | 2 936 ± 105.98a | 12.8 ± 0.33a |
‘宁麦5号’ ‘Ningmai 5’ | -25.5 ± 0.18 | -25.5 ± 0.19 | -25.4 ± 0.12 | -25.2 ± 0.05 | 2 645 ± 78.34c | 12.0 ± 0.07c |
‘西峰27’ ‘Xifeng 27’ | -26.6 ± 0.15 | -26.4 ± 0.09 | -26.2 ± 0.18 | -26.2 ± 0.15 | 2 191 ± 83.90i | 9.4 ± 0.13h |
‘太原10604’ ‘Taiyuan 10604’ | -26.5 ± 0.18 | -26.4 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.14 | -26.4 ± 0.09 | 2 451 ± 93.33f | 11.1 ± 0.28e |
‘05旱鉴27’ ‘05Hanjian 27’ | -27.4 ± 0.10 | -26.8 ± 0.12 | -26.8 ± 0.11 | -26.4 ± 0.19 | 2 240 ± 79.56g | 10.1 ± 0.17g |
‘长6878’ ‘Chang 6878’ | -26.6 ± 0.08 | -26.3 ± 0.09 | -26.1 ± 0.13 | -25.9 ± 0.10 | 2 190 ± 77.18j | 9.5 ± 0.30h |
‘9550’ | -25.8 ± 0.16 | -25.5 ± 0.12 | -25.4 ± 0.07 | -25.4 ± 0.21 | 2 551 ± 100.60d | 11.4 ± 0.43d |
‘1R2’ | -26.2 ± 0.13 | -26.1 ± 0.08 | -26.0 ± 0.16 | -25.7 ± 0.11 | 2 285 ± 81.23j | 10.3 ± 0.19f |
‘1R8’ | -27.2 ± 0.12 | -26.9 ± 0.20 | -26.8 ± 0.13 | -26.2 ± 0.07 | 2 110 ± 79.47i | 8.7 ± 0.21i |
‘1R17’ | -25.9 ± 0.14 | -25.5 ± 0.15 | -25.2 ± 0.11 | -25.0 ± 0.14 | 2 600 ± 62.56c | 11.9 ± 0.05c |
平均值 Mean | -26.33 | -26.04 | -25.93 | -25.73 | 2 393 | 10.6 |
变异系数 CV (%) | 2.61 | 2.64 | 2.59 | 2.30 | 12.24 | 13.73 |
Table 2 Stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in flag leaves, grain yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of different genotypes of winter wheat under dryland condition
基因型 Genotype | δ13C值 δ13C value (‰) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE (kg·hm-2·mm-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5月6日 May 6 | 5月16日 May 16 | 5月31日 May 31 | 6月10日 June 10 | |||
‘陇鉴196’ ‘Longjian 196’ | -26.7 ± 0.11 | -26.6 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.15 | -26.2 ± 0.17 | 2 495 ± 103.37e | 11.3 ± 0.52d |
‘陇鉴127’ ‘Longjian 127’ | -26.8 ± 0.18 | -26.3 ± 0.21 | -26.3 ± 0.10 | -26.0 ± 0.19 | 1 826 ± 110.18k | 8.2 ± 0.37j |
‘陇鉴385’ ‘Longjian 385’ | -26.9 ± 0.09 | -26.8 ± 0.14 | -26.4 ± 0.14 | -26.1 ± 0.11 | 2 110 ± 89.03h | 8.8 ± 0.35i |
‘陇育216’ ‘Longyu 216’ | -26.5 ± 0.15 | -25.9 ± 0.11 | -26.0 ± 0.16 | -25.9 ± 0.15 | 2 480 ± 97.41e | 11.1 ± 0.26e |
‘陇原061’ ‘Longyuan 061’ | -25.4 ± 0.19 | -24.9 ± 0.09 | -24.8 ± 0.10 | -24.8 ± 0.13 | 2 786 ± 124.26b | 12.6 ± 0.64b |
‘定鉴3号’ ‘Dingjian 3’ | -25.0 ± 0.11 | -24.7 ± 0.21 | -24.7 ± 0.12 | -24.6 ± 0.13 | 2 936 ± 105.98a | 12.8 ± 0.33a |
‘宁麦5号’ ‘Ningmai 5’ | -25.5 ± 0.18 | -25.5 ± 0.19 | -25.4 ± 0.12 | -25.2 ± 0.05 | 2 645 ± 78.34c | 12.0 ± 0.07c |
‘西峰27’ ‘Xifeng 27’ | -26.6 ± 0.15 | -26.4 ± 0.09 | -26.2 ± 0.18 | -26.2 ± 0.15 | 2 191 ± 83.90i | 9.4 ± 0.13h |
‘太原10604’ ‘Taiyuan 10604’ | -26.5 ± 0.18 | -26.4 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.14 | -26.4 ± 0.09 | 2 451 ± 93.33f | 11.1 ± 0.28e |
‘05旱鉴27’ ‘05Hanjian 27’ | -27.4 ± 0.10 | -26.8 ± 0.12 | -26.8 ± 0.11 | -26.4 ± 0.19 | 2 240 ± 79.56g | 10.1 ± 0.17g |
‘长6878’ ‘Chang 6878’ | -26.6 ± 0.08 | -26.3 ± 0.09 | -26.1 ± 0.13 | -25.9 ± 0.10 | 2 190 ± 77.18j | 9.5 ± 0.30h |
‘9550’ | -25.8 ± 0.16 | -25.5 ± 0.12 | -25.4 ± 0.07 | -25.4 ± 0.21 | 2 551 ± 100.60d | 11.4 ± 0.43d |
‘1R2’ | -26.2 ± 0.13 | -26.1 ± 0.08 | -26.0 ± 0.16 | -25.7 ± 0.11 | 2 285 ± 81.23j | 10.3 ± 0.19f |
‘1R8’ | -27.2 ± 0.12 | -26.9 ± 0.20 | -26.8 ± 0.13 | -26.2 ± 0.07 | 2 110 ± 79.47i | 8.7 ± 0.21i |
‘1R17’ | -25.9 ± 0.14 | -25.5 ± 0.15 | -25.2 ± 0.11 | -25.0 ± 0.14 | 2 600 ± 62.56c | 11.9 ± 0.05c |
平均值 Mean | -26.33 | -26.04 | -25.93 | -25.73 | 2 393 | 10.6 |
变异系数 CV (%) | 2.61 | 2.64 | 2.59 | 2.30 | 12.24 | 13.73 |
基因型 Genotype | δ13C值 δ13C Value (‰) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE (kg·hm-2·mm-1) | 补偿供水效应 SIE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5月6日 May 6 | 5月16日 May 16 | 5月31日 May 31 | 6月10日 June 10 | ||||
‘陇鉴196’ ‘Longjian 196’ | -26.9 ± 0.08 | -26.6 ± 0.12 | -26.4 ± 0.13 | -26.2 ± 0.10 | 4 251 ± 79.07g | 12.4 ± 0.16e | 1.41 ± 0.08d |
‘陇鉴127’ ‘Longjian 127’ | -27.0 ± 0.13 | -27.0 ± 0.18 | -26.7 ± 0.13 | -26.3 ± 0.12 | 3 725 ± 84.66k | 10.5 ± 0.03j | 1.80 ± 0.11a |
‘陇鉴385’ ‘Longjian 385’ | -26.9 ± 0.12 | -26.8 ± 0.11 | -26.5 ± 0.18 | -26.2 ± 0.08 | 4 315 ± 90.30f | 12.5 ± 0.08de | 1.77 ± 0.05ab |
‘陇育216’ ‘Longyu 216’ | -26.8 ± 0.18 | -26.7 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.20 | -26.4 ± 0.13 | 4 101 ± 93.75i | 11.7 ± 0.12g | 1.38 ± 0.07d |
‘陇原061’ ‘Longyuan 061’ | -26.1 ± 0.09 | -26.0 ± 0.17 | -25.6 ± 0.14 | -25.4 ± 0.18 | 4 325 ± 66.41ef | 12.5 ± 0.07de | 1.23 ± 0.05f |
‘定鉴3号’ ‘Dingjian 3’ | -25.7 ± 0.13 | -25.7 ± 0.09 | -25.4 ± 0.17 | -25.0 ± 0.11 | 4 551 ± 72.07b | 13.1 ± 0.11b | 1.23 ± 0.09f |
‘宁麦5号’ ‘Ningmai 5 ’ | -26.0 ± 0.15 | -26.0 ± 0.13 | -25.7 ± 0.06 | -25.4 ± 0.17 | 4 180 ± 70.28h | 12.1 ± 0.06f | 1.27 ± 0.08ef |
‘西峰27’ ‘Xifeng 27’ | -26.6 ± 0.12 | -26.5 ± 0.11 | -26.3 ± 0.23 | -26.3 ± 0.09 | 4 260 ± 82.23g | 12.2 ± 0.21f | 1.70 ± 0.06b |
‘太原10604’ ‘Taiyuan 10604’ | -26.7 ± 0.10 | -26.6 ± 0.18 | -26.3 ± 0.17 | -26.3 ± 0.17 | 3 950 ± 91.16j | 11.6 ± 0.06h | 1.29 ± 0.03e |
‘05旱鉴27’ ‘05Hanjian 27’ | -27.4 ± 0.19 | -27.1 ± 0.17 | -26.9 ± 0.16 | -26.6 ± 0.14 | 3 171 ± 97.40l | 9.5 ± 0.13k | 0.99 ± 0.05g |
‘长6878’ ‘Chang 6878’ | -26.6 ± 0.08 | -26.6 ± 0.08 | -26.4 ± 0.11 | -26.1 ± 0.12 | 4 395 ± 69.53d | 12.7 ± 0.11c | 1.74 ± 0.04ab |
‘9550’ | -25.9 ± 0.16 | -25.7 ± 0.14 | -25.3 ± 0.18 | -25.1 ± 0.09 | 4 780 ± 63.85a | 13.5 ± 0.09a | 1.66 ± 0.07bc |
‘1R2’ | -26.4 ± 0.11 | -26.3 ± 0.14 | -26.1 ± 0.07 | -25.8 ± 0.06 | 4 336 ± 66.31e | 12.6 ± 0.08d | 1.63 ± 0.05c |
‘1R8’ | -27.2 ± 0.14 | -27.1 ± 0.21 | -26.5 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.11 | 3 936 ± 87.26j | 11.2 ± 0.13i | 1.64 ± 0.04c |
‘1R17’ | -26.0 ± 0.14 | -26.0 ± 0.10 | -25.4 ± 0.13 | -25.3 ± 0.15 | 4 460 ± 72.19c | 13.1 ± 0.09b | 1.42 ± 0.09d |
平均值 Mean | -26.55 | -26.45 | -26.13 | -25.92 | 4 182 | 12.1 | 1.48 |
变异系数CV (%) | 1.93 | 1.80 | 1.96 | 2.06 | 9.13 | 8.72 | 16.65 |
Table 3 Stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in flag leaves, grain yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and supplemental irrigation effect (SIE) of different genotypes of winter wheat under supplemental irrigation at jointing stage
基因型 Genotype | δ13C值 δ13C Value (‰) | 籽粒产量 Grain yield (kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE (kg·hm-2·mm-1) | 补偿供水效应 SIE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5月6日 May 6 | 5月16日 May 16 | 5月31日 May 31 | 6月10日 June 10 | ||||
‘陇鉴196’ ‘Longjian 196’ | -26.9 ± 0.08 | -26.6 ± 0.12 | -26.4 ± 0.13 | -26.2 ± 0.10 | 4 251 ± 79.07g | 12.4 ± 0.16e | 1.41 ± 0.08d |
‘陇鉴127’ ‘Longjian 127’ | -27.0 ± 0.13 | -27.0 ± 0.18 | -26.7 ± 0.13 | -26.3 ± 0.12 | 3 725 ± 84.66k | 10.5 ± 0.03j | 1.80 ± 0.11a |
‘陇鉴385’ ‘Longjian 385’ | -26.9 ± 0.12 | -26.8 ± 0.11 | -26.5 ± 0.18 | -26.2 ± 0.08 | 4 315 ± 90.30f | 12.5 ± 0.08de | 1.77 ± 0.05ab |
‘陇育216’ ‘Longyu 216’ | -26.8 ± 0.18 | -26.7 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.20 | -26.4 ± 0.13 | 4 101 ± 93.75i | 11.7 ± 0.12g | 1.38 ± 0.07d |
‘陇原061’ ‘Longyuan 061’ | -26.1 ± 0.09 | -26.0 ± 0.17 | -25.6 ± 0.14 | -25.4 ± 0.18 | 4 325 ± 66.41ef | 12.5 ± 0.07de | 1.23 ± 0.05f |
‘定鉴3号’ ‘Dingjian 3’ | -25.7 ± 0.13 | -25.7 ± 0.09 | -25.4 ± 0.17 | -25.0 ± 0.11 | 4 551 ± 72.07b | 13.1 ± 0.11b | 1.23 ± 0.09f |
‘宁麦5号’ ‘Ningmai 5 ’ | -26.0 ± 0.15 | -26.0 ± 0.13 | -25.7 ± 0.06 | -25.4 ± 0.17 | 4 180 ± 70.28h | 12.1 ± 0.06f | 1.27 ± 0.08ef |
‘西峰27’ ‘Xifeng 27’ | -26.6 ± 0.12 | -26.5 ± 0.11 | -26.3 ± 0.23 | -26.3 ± 0.09 | 4 260 ± 82.23g | 12.2 ± 0.21f | 1.70 ± 0.06b |
‘太原10604’ ‘Taiyuan 10604’ | -26.7 ± 0.10 | -26.6 ± 0.18 | -26.3 ± 0.17 | -26.3 ± 0.17 | 3 950 ± 91.16j | 11.6 ± 0.06h | 1.29 ± 0.03e |
‘05旱鉴27’ ‘05Hanjian 27’ | -27.4 ± 0.19 | -27.1 ± 0.17 | -26.9 ± 0.16 | -26.6 ± 0.14 | 3 171 ± 97.40l | 9.5 ± 0.13k | 0.99 ± 0.05g |
‘长6878’ ‘Chang 6878’ | -26.6 ± 0.08 | -26.6 ± 0.08 | -26.4 ± 0.11 | -26.1 ± 0.12 | 4 395 ± 69.53d | 12.7 ± 0.11c | 1.74 ± 0.04ab |
‘9550’ | -25.9 ± 0.16 | -25.7 ± 0.14 | -25.3 ± 0.18 | -25.1 ± 0.09 | 4 780 ± 63.85a | 13.5 ± 0.09a | 1.66 ± 0.07bc |
‘1R2’ | -26.4 ± 0.11 | -26.3 ± 0.14 | -26.1 ± 0.07 | -25.8 ± 0.06 | 4 336 ± 66.31e | 12.6 ± 0.08d | 1.63 ± 0.05c |
‘1R8’ | -27.2 ± 0.14 | -27.1 ± 0.21 | -26.5 ± 0.13 | -26.4 ± 0.11 | 3 936 ± 87.26j | 11.2 ± 0.13i | 1.64 ± 0.04c |
‘1R17’ | -26.0 ± 0.14 | -26.0 ± 0.10 | -25.4 ± 0.13 | -25.3 ± 0.15 | 4 460 ± 72.19c | 13.1 ± 0.09b | 1.42 ± 0.09d |
平均值 Mean | -26.55 | -26.45 | -26.13 | -25.92 | 4 182 | 12.1 | 1.48 |
变异系数CV (%) | 1.93 | 1.80 | 1.96 | 2.06 | 9.13 | 8.72 | 16.65 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 平均方 MS | F值 F value | p值 p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
基因型 Genotype (G) | 61.62 | 14 | 4.40 | 93.05 | < 0.001 |
灌浆期 Grain filling stage (S) | 0.78 | 3 | 0.26 | 4.33 | 0.039 |
基因型×灌浆期 G × S | 2.94 | 42 | 0.07 | 1.78 | 0.108 |
Table 4 ANOVA for genotypes and grain filling stages on stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in flag leaves of winter wheat under dryland condition
变异来源 Source of variance | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 平均方 MS | F值 F value | p值 p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
基因型 Genotype (G) | 61.62 | 14 | 4.40 | 93.05 | < 0.001 |
灌浆期 Grain filling stage (S) | 0.78 | 3 | 0.26 | 4.33 | 0.039 |
基因型×灌浆期 G × S | 2.94 | 42 | 0.07 | 1.78 | 0.108 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 平均方 MS | F值 F value | p值 p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
基因型 Genotype (G) | 44.07 | 14 | 3.15 | 172.18 | < 0.001 |
灌浆期 Grain filling stage (S) | 0.96 | 3 | 0.32 | 4.41 | 0.033 |
基因型×灌浆期 G × S | 0.46 | 42 | 0.11 | 2.02 | 0.097 |
Table 5 ANOVA for genotypes and grain filling stages on stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in flag leaves of winter wheat under supplemental irrigation at jointing stage
变异来源 Source of variance | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 平均方 MS | F值 F value | p值 p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
基因型 Genotype (G) | 44.07 | 14 | 3.15 | 172.18 | < 0.001 |
灌浆期 Grain filling stage (S) | 0.96 | 3 | 0.32 | 4.41 | 0.033 |
基因型×灌浆期 G × S | 0.46 | 42 | 0.11 | 2.02 | 0.097 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 平均方 MS | F值 F value | p值 p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水分条件 Water condition | 1.93 | 1 | 1.93 | 33.47 | < 0.01 |
Table 6 ANOVA for different water condition on stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in flag leaves of winter wheat
变异来源 Source of variance | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 平均方 MS | F值 F value | p值 p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水分条件 Water condition | 1.93 | 1 | 1.93 | 33.47 | < 0.01 |
Fig. 1 Regression of stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) value in flag leaves of wheat and grain yield, water use efficiency (WUE) during different grain filling stages under dryland condition. *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.05.
Fig. 2 Regression of stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) value in flag leaves of wheat and grain yield, water use efficiency (WUE) during different grain filling stages under irrigation condition. *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.05.
[1] | Bacon MA (2004). Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford,UK. 1-27. |
[2] |
Boutton TW (1983). Comparison of quartz and pyrex tubes for combustion of organic samples for stable carbon isotope analysis. Analytical Chemistry, 55, 1832-1833.
DOI URL |
[3] | Chen T (陈拓), Feng HY (冯虎元), Xu SJ (徐世建), Qiang WY (强维亚), An LZ (安黎哲) (2002). Stable carbon isotope composition of desert plant leaves and water-use efficiency. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 22, 288-291. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Chen YH (陈英华), Hu J (胡俊), Li YH (李裕红), Xue B (薛博), Yan CL (严重玲) (2004). Application of stable carbon isotope techniques to research into water stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 24, 1027-1033. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] |
Condon AG, Richards RA (1992). Broad sense heritability and genotype × environment interaction for carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 43, 921-934.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (1987). Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlation with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat. Crop Science, 27, 996-1001.
DOI URL |
[7] | Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ (2004). Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 407, 2447-2460. |
[8] | Damesin C, Lelarge C (2003). Carbon isotope composition of current-year shoots from Fagus sylvatica in relation to growth, respiration and use of reserves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26, 207-219. |
[9] |
Delucia EH, Schlesinger WH (2001). Resource-use efficiency and drought tolerance in adjacent Great Basin and Sierran plants. Ecology, 72, 51-58.
DOI URL |
[10] | Ding MM (丁明明), Su XH (苏晓华), Huang QJ (黄秦军) (2005). Application of stable carbon isotope techniques in genetic improvement of forest. World Forestry Research (世界林业研究), 18(5), 21-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Ehleringer JR (1993). Carbon and water relation in desert plants, an isotope perspective. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD eds. Stable Isotope and Plant Carbon-Water Relation. Academic Press, San Diego. 155-172. |
[12] |
Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989). Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 40, 503-537.
DOI URL |
[13] | Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA (1982). On the relationship between carbon dioxide discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 9, 121-137. |
[14] | Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984). Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 11, 539-552. |
[15] | Feng X, Epstein S (1995). Carbon isotopes of trees from arid environments and implications for reconstructing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geochimical et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 2559-2608. |
[16] | Hubick KT, Farquhar GD (1987). Carbon isotope discrimination-selecting for water use efficiency. Australian Cotton Grower, 8, 66-68. |
[17] | Lin ZF (林植芳) (1990). Application of stable isotope technique on plant ecophysiology. Plant Physiology Communications (植物生理学通讯), 3, 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Lin ZF (林植芳), Peng CL (彭长连), Lin GZ (林桂珠) (2001). Carbon isotope discrimination and water use efficiency in different soybean and wheat genotypes. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 27, 439-441. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Liu XB (刘晓冰), Li WX (李文雄) (1996). Preliminary studies on the accumulation of grain starch and protein during grain filling in wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 22, 736-740. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Ma LM (马利民), Liu Y (刘禹), Zhao JF (赵建夫) (2002). Response of stable-carbon isotope composition of different treering compounds to climatic change. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23, 2607-2613. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Mao ZQ (毛振强), Zhang YS (张银锁), Yu ZR (宇振荣) (2003). Water requirement and irrigation scenarios of summer maize production aided by crop growth simulation model. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 29, 419-426. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | McDowell N, Brooks JR, Fitzgerald SA (2003). Carbon isotope discrimination and growth response of old Pinus ponderosa trees to stand density reductions. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 631-644. |
[23] |
Midgley GF, Moll EJ (1993). Gas exchange in arid-adapted shrubs: When is efficient water use a disadvantage? South African Journal of Botany, 59, 491-495.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Mook WG, Bommerson JC, Staverman WH (1974). Carbon isotope fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate and gaseous carbon dioxide. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 22, 169-175.
DOI URL |
[25] | O’Leary MH (1984). Measurement of the isotope fractionation associated with diffusion of carbon dioxide in aqueous solution. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 88, 823-825. |
[26] |
Paneth P, O’Leary MH (1985). Carbon isotope effect on dehydration of bicarbonate ion catalyzed by carbonic anhydrase. Biochemistry, 24, 5143-5147.
DOI URL PMID |
[27] | Pate JS (2001). Carbon isotope discrimination and plant water- use efficiency. In: Unkovich M, Pate JS, McNeill A, Gibbs DJ eds. Stable Isotope Techniques in the Study of Biological Processes and Functioning of Ecosystems. Kluwer, Boston. 19-36. |
[28] | Saranga Y, Flash I, Paterson AH (1999). Carbon isotope ratio in cotton varies with growth stage and plant organ. Plant Science, 142, 782-787. |
[29] |
Scartazza A, Mata C, Matteucci G (2004). Comparisons of δ13C photosynthetic products and ecosystem respiratory CO2 and their responses to seasonal climate variability. Oecologia, 140, 340-351.
DOI URL |
[30] | Shan L (山仑) (2003). Water-saving agriculture and of crop high efficient use of water. Journal of Henan University (Natural Science) (河南大学学报(自然科学版)), 33(1), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] |
van de Water PK, Leavitt SW, Betancourt JL (1994). Trends in stomatal density and13C/12C ratios of Pinus flexilis needles during the last glacial-interglacial cycle. Science, 264, 239-243.
DOI URL |
[32] |
Wright GC, Rao RCN, Farquhar GD (1994). Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in peanut under water deficit conditions. Crop Science, 34, 92-97.
DOI URL |
[33] | Xu X (许兴), Zhu L (朱林), Li SH (李树华), He J (何军), Jing JH (景继海), Dong JL (董建力) (2007). Study on relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and ash content, specific leaf weight, harvest index of wheat in different ecological areas in Ningxia. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (农业科学研究), 28, 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[34] | Xue CY (薛昌颖), Yang XG (杨晓光), Deng W (邓伟), Zhang QP (张秋平), Run WX (闰伟兄), Wang HQ (王化琪), Bouma BAM (2008). Establishing optimum irrigation schedules for aerobic rice in Beijing using ORYZA2000 model. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (农业工程学报), 24(4), 76-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[35] | Yan CR (严昌荣), Han XG (韩兴国), Chen LZ (陈灵芝) (1998). Foliar δ13C within temperate deciduous forest: its spatial change and interspecies variation. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 40, 853-859. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Yi XF (易现峰), Kong XS (孔祥生), Shi GA (史国安), Huang H (黄华) (2005). Attempt of using stable carbon isotope to teach photosynthetic carbon metabolism. Plant Physiology Communications (植物生理学通讯), 41, 665-668. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[37] | Zhang SQ (张岁歧), Shan L (山仑) (2003). Difference of water use efficiency of diploidy wheat species with different chromosome set and its relationship with root system growth. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 29, 569-573. |
[38] |
Zhao FJ, Gao RF, Shen YB (2006). Foliar carbon isotope composition (δ13C) and water use efficiency of different Populus deltoids clones under water stress. Frontiers of Forestry in China, 1(1), 89-94.
DOI URL |
[39] | Zheng SX (郑淑霞), Shangguan ZP (上官周平) (2005). Variation in the δ13C value of typical plants of Loess Plateau over the last 70 years. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29, 289-295. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn