植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 640-649.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0084
所属专题: 生物多样性
收稿日期:
2005-08-26
接受日期:
2005-12-01
出版日期:
2006-08-26
发布日期:
2006-07-30
通讯作者:
高玉葆
作者简介:
*E-mail:ybgao@nankai.edu.cn基金资助:
WEI Yu-Kun, GAO Yu-Bao*(), LI Chuan, XU Hua, Ren An-Zhi
Received:
2005-08-26
Accepted:
2005-12-01
Online:
2006-08-26
Published:
2006-07-30
Contact:
GAO Yu-Bao
摘要:
该文从形态学和基因水平上对内蒙古中东部草原4个羽茅(Achnatherum sibiricum)种群所含的27个内生真菌(Neotyphodium)菌株的遗传多样性进行了研究,结果表明羽茅内生真菌在形态学和基因水平上均表现出较高的遗传多样性。在PDA培养基上,根据菌落颜色、质地、生长速率和分生孢子外观等特征,可分为4个形态型;西乌旗、霍林郭勒和定位站3个种群所含的内生真菌菌落具有相似的生长特性和外观,而羊草(Leymus chinensis)样地种群无论从菌落外观和质地的多样性,还是遗传多样性指数均高于其它3个样地。用20个随机引物对这27株内生真菌基因组DNA进行RAPD分析,共检测到463个位点,其中461个为多态位点,多态位点百分率达99.6%,特有位点93个,占20.1%。Nei基因多样性指数h和Shannon多样性指数I分别为 0.238 0和0.387 0;多数菌株间的遗传一致度较低而遗传距离较大,在DNA水平上存在较显著的遗传变异。基于Nei无偏遗传距离和UPGMA法的聚类分析结果将27株内生真菌分为7组,并且与形态型的划分基本一致,RAPD分析方法提高了内生真菌类群划分的可靠性。
魏宇昆, 高玉葆, 李川, 许华, 任安芝. 内蒙古中东部草原羽茅内生真菌的遗传多样性. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 640-649. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0084
WEI Yu-Kun, GAO Yu-Bao, LI Chuan, XU Hua, Ren An-Zhi. GENETIC DIVERSITY OF NEOTYPHODIUM ENDOPHYTES ISOLATED FROM ACHNATHERUM SIBIRICUM POPULATIONS IN MID-AND EASTERN INNER MONGOLIA STEPPE, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(4): 640-649. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0084
种群 Population | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 菌落颜色 Colony color | 菌落质地 Colony texture | 菌落突出/凹陷 Colony raised/ depressed | 生长速率 Growth rate (mm·d-1) | 孢子形态 Conidium shape | 孢子平均 长度 Mean length of conidia (μm) | 侵染率 Infection frequency (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
霍林郭勒 Hulingol | HA | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.41 | 肾形 Reniform | 3.1 | 40 | ||||
HB | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.27 | 卵形/椭圆形、 半圆形 Obovate, oblong, semiglobular | |||||||
HC | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘紧贴、中间突出 Centre raised, margin appressed | 1.24 | 半圆形 Semiglobular | |||||||
HD | 灰白色 Off-white | 绵状、松散、 气生菌丝丰富 Lanose, loose, aerial mycelium abundant | 紧贴 Appressed | 2.86 | - | |||||||
HF | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.63 | 卵形、半圆形 Obovate, semiglobular | |||||||
西乌旗 Xi Ujimqin Qi | XA | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 中间紧贴、边缘突出 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.45 | 卵形、半圆形 Obovate, semiglobular | 4.0 | 90 | ||||
XB | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 中间紧贴、边缘突出 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.89 | 椭圆形、肾形 Oblong, reniform | |||||||
XC | 白色 White | 绵状疏松、 气生菌丝丰富 Lanose, loose, aerial mycelium abundant | 边缘紧贴、中间突出 Centre raised, margin appressed | 2.01 | - | |||||||
XD | 白色 White | 绵状疏松、 气生菌丝丰富 Lanose, loose, aerial mycelium abundant | 边缘紧贴、中间突出 Centre raised, margin appressed | 2.38 | - | |||||||
XE | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.92 | - | |||||||
XF | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 2.01 | - | |||||||
XG | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.54 | - | |||||||
定位站 IMGERS-CAS | IB | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.28 | 肾形 Reniform | 4.3 | 80 | ||||
IC | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.22 | 肾形、船形 Reniform, navicular | |||||||
ID | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.5 | 肾形、船形 Reniform, navicular | |||||||
IG | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.29 | - | |||||||
羊草样地 Leymus chinensis plot of the IMGERS- CAS | LA | 白色/灰白色 White/off- white | 毡状、辐射状褶皱、 紧密、气生菌丝少量 Felty, radial drape, tight, aerial mycelium scarce | 紧贴/突出 Elevated to appressed | 1.83 | - | 4.3 | 90 | ||||
LB | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.45 | 船形 Navicular | |||||||
种群 Population | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 菌落颜色 Colony color | 菌落质地 Colony texture | 菌落突出/凹陷 Colony raised/ depressed | 生长速率 Growth rate (mm·d-1) | 孢子形态 Conidium shape | 孢子平均 长度 Mean length of conidia (μm) | 侵染率 Infection frequency (%) | ||||
LC | 白色/灰白色 White/off-white | 毡状、辐射状褶皱、 紧密、气生菌丝少量 Felty, radial drape, tight, aerial mycelium scarce | 紧贴/突出 Elevated to appressed | 1.23 | - | |||||||
LD | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 突出半球型 Semiglobular riased | 1.81 | 肾形 Reniform | |||||||
LE | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.38 | 肾形 Reniform | |||||||
LH | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.52 | - | |||||||
LI | 白色 White | 外层珊瑚状、内层棉状 Centre raised, cottony, coral-like in margin | 突出 Raised | 0.48 | 船形 Reniform | |||||||
LJ | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.4 | 船形 Navicular | |||||||
LK | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.5 | 船形、半月形 Navicular, lunate | |||||||
LL | 墨绿色 Black green | 棉状/垫状、致密 Cottony to pulvinate, compact | 突出 Raised | 1.06 | - | |||||||
LM | 浅黄色 Buff | 无规则腊状小块堆积 Irregular waxy, piled up | 突出 Raised | - | - |
表1 羽茅内生真菌Neotyphodium在PDA上的培养特征、孢子形态和侵染率
Table 1 The characteristics of colony and conidia of Neotyphodium on PDA and infection frequency of Neotyphodium
种群 Population | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 菌落颜色 Colony color | 菌落质地 Colony texture | 菌落突出/凹陷 Colony raised/ depressed | 生长速率 Growth rate (mm·d-1) | 孢子形态 Conidium shape | 孢子平均 长度 Mean length of conidia (μm) | 侵染率 Infection frequency (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
霍林郭勒 Hulingol | HA | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.41 | 肾形 Reniform | 3.1 | 40 | ||||
HB | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.27 | 卵形/椭圆形、 半圆形 Obovate, oblong, semiglobular | |||||||
HC | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘紧贴、中间突出 Centre raised, margin appressed | 1.24 | 半圆形 Semiglobular | |||||||
HD | 灰白色 Off-white | 绵状、松散、 气生菌丝丰富 Lanose, loose, aerial mycelium abundant | 紧贴 Appressed | 2.86 | - | |||||||
HF | 中间微黄色、四周白色 Yellowish centre, white margin | 棉状、疏松 Cottony, slightly loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.63 | 卵形、半圆形 Obovate, semiglobular | |||||||
西乌旗 Xi Ujimqin Qi | XA | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 中间紧贴、边缘突出 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.45 | 卵形、半圆形 Obovate, semiglobular | 4.0 | 90 | ||||
XB | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 中间紧贴、边缘突出 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.89 | 椭圆形、肾形 Oblong, reniform | |||||||
XC | 白色 White | 绵状疏松、 气生菌丝丰富 Lanose, loose, aerial mycelium abundant | 边缘紧贴、中间突出 Centre raised, margin appressed | 2.01 | - | |||||||
XD | 白色 White | 绵状疏松、 气生菌丝丰富 Lanose, loose, aerial mycelium abundant | 边缘紧贴、中间突出 Centre raised, margin appressed | 2.38 | - | |||||||
XE | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.92 | - | |||||||
XF | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 2.01 | - | |||||||
XG | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 边缘突出、中间凹陷 Centre depressed, margin raised | 1.54 | - | |||||||
定位站 IMGERS-CAS | IB | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.28 | 肾形 Reniform | 4.3 | 80 | ||||
IC | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.22 | 肾形、船形 Reniform, navicular | |||||||
ID | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.5 | 肾形、船形 Reniform, navicular | |||||||
IG | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.29 | - | |||||||
羊草样地 Leymus chinensis plot of the IMGERS- CAS | LA | 白色/灰白色 White/off- white | 毡状、辐射状褶皱、 紧密、气生菌丝少量 Felty, radial drape, tight, aerial mycelium scarce | 紧贴/突出 Elevated to appressed | 1.83 | - | 4.3 | 90 | ||||
LB | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.45 | 船形 Navicular | |||||||
种群 Population | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 菌落颜色 Colony color | 菌落质地 Colony texture | 菌落突出/凹陷 Colony raised/ depressed | 生长速率 Growth rate (mm·d-1) | 孢子形态 Conidium shape | 孢子平均 长度 Mean length of conidia (μm) | 侵染率 Infection frequency (%) | ||||
LC | 白色/灰白色 White/off-white | 毡状、辐射状褶皱、 紧密、气生菌丝少量 Felty, radial drape, tight, aerial mycelium scarce | 紧贴/突出 Elevated to appressed | 1.23 | - | |||||||
LD | 白色 White | 绵状、疏松 Lanose, loose | 突出半球型 Semiglobular riased | 1.81 | 肾形 Reniform | |||||||
LE | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.38 | 肾形 Reniform | |||||||
LH | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.52 | - | |||||||
LI | 白色 White | 外层珊瑚状、内层棉状 Centre raised, cottony, coral-like in margin | 突出 Raised | 0.48 | 船形 Reniform | |||||||
LJ | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.4 | 船形 Navicular | |||||||
LK | 白色 White | 棉状、致密 Cottony, compact | 突出 Raised | 0.5 | 船形、半月形 Navicular, lunate | |||||||
LL | 墨绿色 Black green | 棉状/垫状、致密 Cottony to pulvinate, compact | 突出 Raised | 1.06 | - | |||||||
LM | 浅黄色 Buff | 无规则腊状小块堆积 Irregular waxy, piled up | 突出 Raised | - | - |
种群 Population | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 多态位点数 Number of polymorphic loci | 多态位点 百分率 Percentage of polymorphic loci (%) | 特有位点数 Number of unique loci | 特有位点 百分率 Percentage of unique loci (%) | 等位基因 平均数 Average number of alleles (Na) | 有效等位 基因数 Number of effective alleles (Ne) | Nei基因 多样性 Nei's gene diversity (h) | Shannon 多样性指数 Shannon's index of diversity (I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
霍林郭勒 Hulingol | HA | 154 | 33.26 | 3 | 3.22 | 1.332 6 | 1.200 5 | 0.122 | 0.183 2 |
HB | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
HC | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
HD | 11 | 11.8 | |||||||
HF | 0 | 0 | |||||||
西乌旗 Xi Ujimqin Qi | XA | 233 | 50.32 | 2 | 2.15 | 1.503 2 | 1.303 5 | 0.180 4 | 0.270 9 |
XB | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
XC | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
XD | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
XE | 0 | 0 | |||||||
XF | 5 | 5.38 | |||||||
XG | 5 | 5.38 | |||||||
定位站 IMGERS-CAS | IB | 164 | 35.42 | 6 | 6.45 | 1.354 2 | 1.255 7 | 0.146 3 | 0.213 3 |
IC | 4 | 4.30 | |||||||
ID | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
IG | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
羊草样地 Leymus chinensis plot of the IMGERS-CAS | LA | 335 | 72.35 | 1 | 1.08 | 1.723 5 | 1.329 9 | 0.210 7 | 0.331 1 |
LB | 11 | 11.8 | |||||||
LC | 5 | 5.38 | |||||||
LD | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LE | 6 | 6.45 | |||||||
LH | 7 | 7.52 | |||||||
LI | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LJ | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LK | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LL | 10 | 10.8 | |||||||
LM | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
461 | 99.6 | 93 | 20.1 | 1.995 7 | 1.355 5 | 0.238 | 0.387 |
表2 4个羽茅内生真菌Neotyphodium种群的RAPD位点和遗传多样性
Table 2 RAPD locus and genetic diversity of four Neotyphodium populations
种群 Population | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 多态位点数 Number of polymorphic loci | 多态位点 百分率 Percentage of polymorphic loci (%) | 特有位点数 Number of unique loci | 特有位点 百分率 Percentage of unique loci (%) | 等位基因 平均数 Average number of alleles (Na) | 有效等位 基因数 Number of effective alleles (Ne) | Nei基因 多样性 Nei's gene diversity (h) | Shannon 多样性指数 Shannon's index of diversity (I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
霍林郭勒 Hulingol | HA | 154 | 33.26 | 3 | 3.22 | 1.332 6 | 1.200 5 | 0.122 | 0.183 2 |
HB | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
HC | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
HD | 11 | 11.8 | |||||||
HF | 0 | 0 | |||||||
西乌旗 Xi Ujimqin Qi | XA | 233 | 50.32 | 2 | 2.15 | 1.503 2 | 1.303 5 | 0.180 4 | 0.270 9 |
XB | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
XC | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
XD | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
XE | 0 | 0 | |||||||
XF | 5 | 5.38 | |||||||
XG | 5 | 5.38 | |||||||
定位站 IMGERS-CAS | IB | 164 | 35.42 | 6 | 6.45 | 1.354 2 | 1.255 7 | 0.146 3 | 0.213 3 |
IC | 4 | 4.30 | |||||||
ID | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
IG | 2 | 2.15 | |||||||
羊草样地 Leymus chinensis plot of the IMGERS-CAS | LA | 335 | 72.35 | 1 | 1.08 | 1.723 5 | 1.329 9 | 0.210 7 | 0.331 1 |
LB | 11 | 11.8 | |||||||
LC | 5 | 5.38 | |||||||
LD | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LE | 6 | 6.45 | |||||||
LH | 7 | 7.52 | |||||||
LI | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LJ | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LK | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
LL | 10 | 10.8 | |||||||
LM | 1 | 1.08 | |||||||
461 | 99.6 | 93 | 20.1 | 1.995 7 | 1.355 5 | 0.238 | 0.387 |
[1] | Ahlholm J, Helander ML, Elamo P, Saloniemi I, Neuvonen S, Hanhimäki S, Saikkonen K(2002). Micro-fungi and invertebrate herbivores on birch trees: fungal mediated plant-herbivore interactions or responses to host quality? Ecology Letters, 5, 648-655. |
[2] | Bruehl GW, Kaiser WJ, Klein RE(1994). An endophyte of Achnatherum inebrians, an intoxicating grass of northwest China. Mycologia, 86, 773-776. |
[3] | Clay K, Schardl CL(2002). Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. American Naturalist, 160, 99-127. |
[4] | Clement SL, Elberson LR, Youssef NN, Davitt CM, Doss RP(2001). Incidence and diversity of Neotyphodium fungal endophytes in tall fescue from Morocco, Tunisia, and Sardinia. Crop Science, 41, 570-576. |
[5] |
De Jong EVZ, Guthridge KM, Spangenberg GC, Forster JW(2003). Development and characterization of EST-derived simple sequence repeat(SSR) markers for pasture grass endophytes. Genome, 46, 277-290.
URL PMID |
[6] | Faeth SH (2002). Are endophytic fungi defensive plant mutualists? Oikos, 98, 25-36. |
[7] | Faeth SH, Sullivan TJ(2003). Mutualistic asexual endophytes in a native grass are usually parasitic. American Naturalist, 161, 310-325. |
[8] |
García RA, Zapater JMM, Criado BG, Zabalgogeazcoa I(2002). Genetic structure of natural populations of the grass endophyte Epichloı festucae in semiarid grasslands. Molecular Ecology, 11, 355-364.
DOI URL PMID |
[9] | Glenn AE, Bacon CW, Price R, Hanlin RT(1996). Molecular phylogeny of Acremonium and its taxonomic implications. Mycologia, 88, 369-383. |
[10] |
Guo LD, Hyde KD, Liew EC(2001). Detection and taxonomic placement of endophytic fungi within frond tissues of Livistona chinensis based on rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20, 1-13.
URL PMID |
[11] | Jensen AMD, Roulund N(2004). Occurrence of Neotyphodium endophytes in permanent grassland with perennial ryegrass(Lolium perenne) in Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 104, 419-427. |
[12] |
Kelemu S, Huang DY, Huang GX, Takayama Y(2003). Detecting and differentiating Acremonium implicatum: developing a PCR-based method for an endophytic fungus associated with the genus Brachiaria. Molecular Plant Pathology, 4, 115-118.
DOI URL PMID |
[13] | Kimura M(1953). Stepping-stone model of population. Annual Report of the National Institute of Genetics,Japan, 3, 62-63. |
[14] | Latch GCM, Christensen MJ, Samuels GJ(1984). Five endophytes of Lolium and Festuca in New Zealand. Mycotaxon, 20, 535-550. |
[15] | Moon CD, Miles CO, Järlfors U, Schardl CL(2002). The evolutionary origins of three new Neotyphodium endophyte species from grasses indigenous to the southern hemisphere. Mycologia, 94, 694-711. |
[16] | Morgan-Jones G, Gams W(1982). Notes on hyphomycetes. XLI. An endophyte of Festuca arundinacea and the anamorph of Epichloı typhina, new taxa in one of two new sections of Acremonium. Mycotaxon, 15, 311-318. |
[17] | Nan ZB( 南志标), Li CJ( 李春杰)(2004). Roles of the grass-Neotyphodium association in pastoral agriculture systems. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 24, 605-616.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] |
Nei M (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70, 3321-3323.
URL PMID |
[19] |
Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89, 583-590.
URL PMID |
[20] | Ravel C, Michalakis Y, Charmet G(1997). The effect of imperfect transmission of the frequency of mutualistic seed-borne endophytes in natural populations of grasses. Oikos, 80, 18-24. |
[21] | Saikkonen K, Faeth SH, Helander M, Sullivan TJ (1998). Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 319-343. |
[22] |
Saikkonen K, W⁉li P, Helander M, Faeth SH (2004). Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses. Trends in Plant Science, 9, 275-280.
DOI URL PMID |
[23] |
Schardl CL(1996). Epichloı species:fungal symbionts of grasses. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 34, 109-130.
DOI URL |
[24] | Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L(2000). Arlequin: a software for Population Genetics Data Analysis, Ver 2.000. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology University of Geneva, Switzerland. |
[25] |
Sullivan TJ, Faeth SH (2004). Gene flow in the endophyte Neotyphodium and implications for coevolution with Festuca arizonica. Molecular Ecology, 13, 649-656.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Tsai HF, Liu JS, Staben C, Christensen MJ, Latch GC, Siegel MR, Schardl CL(1994). Evolutionary diversification of fungal endophytes of tall fescue grass by hybridization with Epichloı species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 2542-2546.
DOI URL PMID |
[27] | Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX(1997). Popgene, the User-Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada (program available from: http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/. |
[28] |
Zabalgogeazcoa I, Vázquez de Aldana BR, García Criado B, García Ciudad A(1999). The infection of Festuca rubra by the fungal endophyte Epichloı festuca in Mediterranean permanent grasslands. Grass and Forage Science, 54, 91-95.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Zabalgogeazcoa I, Vázquez de Aldana BR, García Ciudad A, García Criado B(2003). Fungal endophytes in grasses from semi-arid permanent grasslands of western Spain. Grass and Forage Science, 58, 94-97.
DOI URL |
[1] | 李冠军, 陈珑, 余雯静, 苏亲桂, 吴承祯, 苏军, 李键. 固体培养内生真菌对土壤盐胁迫下木麻黄幼苗渗透调节和抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 804-821. |
[2] | 陈天翌, 娄安如. 青藏高原东侧白桦种群的遗传多样性与遗传结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 561-568. |
[3] | 石新建, 张靖歆, 秦天姿, 刘金铭, 高玉葆, 任安芝. 内生真菌感染对宿主羽茅及邻生植物抗病性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 860-869. |
[4] | 秦天姿, 任安芝, 樊晓雯, 高玉葆. 内生真菌种类和母本基因型对内生真菌-禾草共生体叶形状和叶面积的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 654-660. |
[5] | 张新新, 王茜, 胡颖, 周玮, 陈晓阳, 胡新生. 植物边缘种群遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5): 383-395. |
[6] | 吴曼, 李娟娟, 刘金铭, 任安芝, 高玉葆. 刈割干扰和养分添加条件下Epichloë内生真菌感染对羽茅所在群落多样性和生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(2): 85-93. |
[7] | 李春杰, 姚祥, 南志标. 醉马草内生真菌共生体研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(8): 793-805. |
[8] | 张俪文, 韩广轩. 植物遗传多样性与生态系统功能关系的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 977-989. |
[9] | 孙茜, 薛子可, 解琳琳, 贺学礼, 赵丽莉. 沙冬青及其伴生植物深色有隔内生真菌物种多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(7): 729-737. |
[10] | 牛毅, 高远, 李隔萍, 任安芝, 高玉葆. 内生真菌对羽茅抗病性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(9): 925-932. |
[11] | 孙茜, 贺超, 贺学礼, 赵丽莉. 沙冬青与伴生植物深色有隔内生真菌定殖规律及其与土壤因子的相关性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(9): 878-889. |
[12] | 李秀璋, 姚祥, 李春杰, 南志标. 禾草内生真菌作为生防因子的潜力分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(6): 621-634. |
[13] | 刘慧, 陈薇, 周勇, 李夏, 任安芝, 高玉葆. 内生真菌和丛枝菌根真菌对羊草生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(5): 477-485. |
[14] | 王锦楠, 陈进福, 陈武生, 周新洋, 许东, 李际红, 亓晓. 柴达木地区野生黑果枸杞种群遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(10): 1003-1011. |
[15] | 贾彤, 任安芝, 魏茂英, 尹立佳, 高玉葆. 不同传播方式的内生真菌感染对羽茅的生理生态影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(1): 72-80. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19