楚科奇海和白令海网采浮游植物群聚的多元分析

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2006.0098

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

根据1999年夏季(7~8月)我国首次北极科学考察期间“雪龙”号考察船在楚科奇海(66°0.3'~75°18.6' N, 153°36.5'~174°59.5' W)和白令海(55°59.8'~66°0.3' N,173°21.1' E~175°53.9' W)49个站采集的样品研究了该区网采浮游植物的分布特征。结果显示,两个调查区的浮游植物多样性指数和均匀度平均值几乎相等且都较低,分别变动在1.88~1.90和0.43~0.45之间。然而,两个区存在明显的空间异质性。就丰富度和种类组成而言,楚科奇海的细胞密度和物种总数量远高于白令海,前者为9 122.56×10⁴ cells·m^-3 和103种,而后者为161.78×10⁴ cells·m^-3和71种。上述生态学指标不同站点间的变异也大。用多元分析方法对浮游植物群聚的分布异质性加以讨论。主成分分析(PCA)结果表明,解析调查区浮游植物分布方差的33.0%的两个最主要成分(即主要物种变量)分别是北极-北方浅海群落(泛北极群落)和北方大洋群落的主要种群。前者包括某些圆心硅藻,如旋链角毛藻 (Chaetoceros curvisetus)、柔弱角毛藻(C. debilis)、聚生角毛藻(C. socialis)、叉尖角毛藻(C.furcellatus)等多种寡色体类角毛藻以及冷淡劳德藻 (Lauderia glacialis)、丹麦细柱藻 (Leptocylindrus danicus)、诺登海链藻(Thalassiosira nordenskioldii)和脆杆链藻(Bacteriosira fragilis)等;后者主要有小环毛藻 (Corethron criophilum)、平截鼻状藻 (Proboscia truncata)、无刺鼻状藻 (P. inermis)、西氏细齿状藻(Dentecula seminae)和一些多色暗角毛类角毛藻,如大西洋角毛藻(Chaetoceros atlanticus)等。泛北极群落主要分布于楚科奇海南部和中部,而北方大洋群落的主要分布区在白令海调查区的西南部。通过聚类分析还辨认出7个包含不同群落的主要网采浮游植物分布区,但是由于不同水系的不同程度影响,以及极具不确定性的浮冰的位置及其物理状态(聚集、开裂和消融等)也会在短时间内给调查区生物过程导入变异性,从而使得这些分布区的归类复杂化,尤其在楚科奇海。

关键词: 楚科奇海和白令海, 网采浮游植物, 分布, 生态学, 多元分析

Abstract:

Background and Aims The phytoplankton in the Arctic seas is rarely explored on a large geographic scale, particularly at the community level.The diversity, density and distribution variability of netphytoplankton assemblages were measured at 49 stations in the Chukchi Sea (66°0.3'-75°18.6' N, 153°36.5'-174°59.5' W) and Bering Sea (55°59.8'-66°0.3' N, 173°21.1' E-175°53.9' W) during the FCNARE (1999) cruise on the Xuelong Research Vessel of SOA, China.

Methods The diversity indices combining the data on the abundance within a species in a community into a single number were adopted to understand the state of the community. Principal component analysis (PCA) of data was applied for examing the distribution variability of netphytoplankton. Cluster analysis was used as indicative of the degree of similarity in species composition among stations to the selected species having a frequency of occurrence greater than 10% of the total samples.

Key Results Both the mean index values of phytoplankton diversity and evenness were approximately equally low at the two study areas, ranging from 1.88 to 1.90 and from 0.43 to 0.45, respectively. However,both the average cell density and total species numbers in the Chukchi Sea were far greater than these in the Bering Sea, reaching 9 122.56×10⁴ cells·m^-3 and 103 taxa in the Chukchi Sea but only 161.78×10⁴ cells·m^-3 and 71 taxa in the Bering Sea. The results of PCA indicated that the first two components (the most important species variables) explained 33.0% of the total variance in the netphytoplankton distribution in the study areas. The main populations belong to the arctic-boreal community (pan-arctic community) and boreal oceanic community, including some centric diatoms in the arctic-boreal community, such as Chaetoceros curvisetus, C. debilis, C. socialis, C.furcellatus etc. belonging to the Chaetoceros-Oligochromatophorus group, and Lauderia glacialis, Leptocylindrus danicus, Thalassiosira nordenskioldii and Bacteriosira fragilis etc., as well as Corethron criophilum, Proboscia truncata, P. inermis, Dentecula seminaeandsome and some species belonging to Chaetoceros-Phaeoceros-Polychromatophorus group such as Chaetoceros atlanticus etc. in the boreal oceanic community. Seven major netphytoplankton regions containing different phytoplankton communities in two study areas were distinguished by the cluster analysis. However, the extremely dynamic physical nature of the drifting pack ice (e.g. packing, breaking up and melting) introduce short-term variability into the water conditions that no doubt affect the species composition; hence, the groupings of the netphytoplankton in the different regions may reflect temporal conditions, particularly in the Chukchi Sea, that require repeated sampling in order to better classify the regions.

Conclusions There were strong differences in the density and taxa of the netphytoplankton between the Chukchi Sea and Bering Sea. The density and composition were highly variable among sampling sites, particularly in Chukchi Sea.

Key words: Chukchi Sea and Bering Sea, Netphytoplankton, Distribution, Ecology, Multivariate analysis

杨清良, 林更铭. 楚科奇海和白令海网采浮游植物群聚的多元分析. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(5): 763-770. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0098

YANG Qing-Liang, LIN Geng-Ming. A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF NETPHYTOPLANKTON ASSEMBLAGES IN THE CHUKCHI SEA AND BERING SEA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(5): 763-770. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0098

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0098

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2006/V30/I5/763

图/表 7

参考文献 20

[1]	Blasco D, Estrada M, Jones B (1980). Relationship between the phytoplankton distribution and composition and the hydrography in the Northwest African upwelling region near Cabo Corbeiro. Deep-Sea Research, 27A,799-821.
[2]	Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monograph, 27,325-349.
[3]	Cecilie H, von Quillfeldt CH (2003). Microalgae and biodiversity in polar regions. In: Iken K, Konar B eds. Proceedings of the Arctic Biodiversity Workshop: New Census of Marine Life Initiative. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Fairbanks, Alaska, M-26,131-149.
[4]	Chen LQ (陈立奇), Zhao JP (赵进平), Bian LG (卞林根), Chen M (陈敏), Gao AG(高爱国), Chen B (陈波) (2003). Marine Environment and Air-Sea Interaction in the Arctic Region (北极海洋环境与海气相互作用研究). China Ocean Press, Beijing, 1-339. (in Chinese)
[5]	Estrada M, Blasco D (1979). Two phases of the phytoplankton community in the Baja California upwelling. Limnology and Oceanography, 24,1065-1080.
[6]	Heimdal BR (1989). Arctic ocean phytoplankton. In: Herman Yed. The Arctic Seas—Climatology,Oceanography,Geology,and Biology. van Nostrand Reinnold Company, New York, 193-222.
[7]	Horner RA, Alexander V (1972). Algal population in Arctic sea ice: an inverstigation of heterotrophy. Limnology and Oceanography, 17,454-458.
[8]	Huang R, Jan LL, Chang CH (1988). A preliminary analysis of phytoplankton variability in the western Philippine Sea. Acta Oceanographica Taiwannica, 21,82-91.
[9]	Huang R (1988). The influence of hydrography on the distribution of phytoplankton in the southern Taiwan Strait. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 26,643-656.
[10]	Huang R (1993). Phytoplankton distribution in the South China Sea and Kuroshio—flowing region of Taiwan. Acta Oceanographica Taiwannica, 31,73-82.
[11]	Matta JF, Marshall HG (1984). A multivariate analysis of phytoplankton assemblages in the western North Atlantic. Journal of Plankton Research, 6,663-675.
[12]	Melnikov IA (1997). The Arctic Sea Ice Ecosystem. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amstedam, the Nethelands. 67-90.
[13]	Motoda S, Minoda T (1974). Plankton of the Bering Sea.In: Hood DW, Kelley EJ eds. Oceanography of the Bering Sea. Vail-Ballou Press, Fairbanks,Alaska, 207-241.
[14]	Odum EP (1992). Great ideas in ecology for the 1990s. BioScience, 42,542-545.
[15]	Pielous EC (1969). An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley Interscience, New York,1-286.
[16]	Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Illinios University Press, Urbana, Illinios, 1-125.
[17]	Tang YX(汤毓祥), Jiao YT(矫玉田), Zou EM(邹娥梅) (2001). Preliminary analysis of the hydrographic features and water masses in the Bering Sea and the Chukchi Sea. Chinese Journal of Polar Research(极地研究), 13,57-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Wang ZP (王自磐) (1997). Marine biology process and global climatic changes in Polar Regions. Donghai Marine Science (东海海洋), 15(3),29-35. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Werner D (1977). The Biology of Diatoms. Botanical Monographs Vol. 13. University of California Press, Berkeley, Califonia, 1-498.
[20]	Yang QL (杨清良), Lin GM (林更铭), Lin M(林茂), Lin JH (林景宏), Dai YY (戴燕玉) (2002). Species composition and distribution of phytoplankton in the Chukchi Sea and the Bering Sea. Chinese Journal of Polar Research (极地研究), 14,113-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)

门类 Phylum		物种和属数 Numbers of species (S) and genus (G)
		楚科奇海 Chukchi Sea		白令海 Bering Sea		共有种 Common in both areas		小计 Total
		属G	种S	属G	种S	属G	种S	属G	种S
硅类门Bacillariophyta	28	94	20	57	11	44	32	104
甲藻门Pyrrophyta	2	6	3	12	1	3	3	14
金藻门Chrysophyta	3	3	2	2	1	2	3	3
合计Sum	33	103	25	71	13	49	38	121

门类 Phylum		物种和属数 Numbers of species (S) and genus (G)
		楚科奇海 Chukchi Sea		白令海 Bering Sea		共有种 Common in both areas		小计 Total
		属G	种S	属G	种S	属G	种S	属G	种S
硅类门Bacillariophyta	28	94	20	57	11	44	32	104
甲藻门Pyrrophyta	2	6	3	12	1	3	3	14
金藻门Chrysophyta	3	3	2	2	1	2	3	3
合计Sum	33	103	25	71	13	49	38	121

海域 Area	测站间变化范围 Ranging of parameters among stations
海域 Area	细胞密度 Cell density (10⁴ cells·m^-3)	均匀度 Evenness(J)	多样性指数 Diversity index(H')
楚科奇海Chukchi Sea	0.16~90 680.2	0.07~0.87	0.33~3.82
	(平均Mean:9 122.56)	(平均Mean:0.43)	(平均Mean:1.90)
白令海 Bering Sea	0.47~1 481.28	0.01~0.75	0.03~3.01
	(平均Mean:161.78)	(平均Mean: 0.45)	(平均Mean:1.88)
平均 Average	4 733.61	0.44	1.89

海域 Area	测站间变化范围 Ranging of parameters among stations
海域 Area	细胞密度 Cell density (10⁴ cells·m^-3)	均匀度 Evenness(J)	多样性指数 Diversity index(H')
楚科奇海Chukchi Sea	0.16~90 680.2	0.07~0.87	0.33~3.82
	(平均Mean:9 122.56)	(平均Mean:0.43)	(平均Mean:1.90)
白令海 Bering Sea	0.47~1 481.28	0.01~0.75	0.03~3.01
	(平均Mean:161.78)	(平均Mean: 0.45)	(平均Mean:1.88)
平均 Average	4 733.61	0.44	1.89

主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigenvalues	方差贡献率 Percent of variance (%)	累积贡献率 Cumulative variance (%)
1	10.86	18.7	18.7
2	8.27	14.3	33.0
3	5.61	9.7	42.7
4	4.32	7.5	50.1
5	3.95	6.8	56.9