植物生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 1106-1116.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01106
收稿日期:
2011-06-14
接受日期:
2011-08-23
出版日期:
2011-06-14
发布日期:
2011-11-07
通讯作者:
郭大立
作者简介:
*(E-mail:dlguo@urban.pku.edu.cn)
YIN Sen-Lu1, KONG De-Liang2, GUO Da-Li1,2,*()
Received:
2011-06-14
Accepted:
2011-08-23
Online:
2011-06-14
Published:
2011-11-07
Contact:
GUO Da-Li
摘要:
根系在植物养分吸收、生理代谢和生态系统过程中发挥着重要作用, 然而我们对根系结构与功能的了解十分有限。以往对根系的研究往往用直径大小定义细根, 忽略了细根系统内部结构和功能的异质性。近年来的研究表明, 细根系统中的根级(root order)与根的功能有较好的相关性, 低级根个体多属于短命的吸收根。温带森林的研究表明, 非木质化的吸收根在氮(N)浓度上呈现显著的季节变化, 而与木质化的结构性根缺少N浓度的季节变化形成鲜明对比。该研究通过研究亚热带树木不同根级N浓度的季节变化, 试图验证假说: 木本植物中, 非木质化的根中N浓度具有明显的季节变化是一个普遍现象。通过对鼎湖山常见的9种木本植物不同根级的研究, 证实了在1年内的6个采样时段, 各根级的N浓度之间都存在显著差异; 与温带树种不同, 各树种不同根级的N浓度变化呈现不同的季节格局, 这与假说不符。因此认为温带与亚热带森林生态系统之间的环境差异以及树种之间的差异是导致亚热带树种低级根的N浓度季节变化不显著, 而三、四级根变化相对显著的主要原因。这些发现对于认识树木根系统内及个体水平的N分配与利用格局具有重要的意义。
结果 Fruition
银森录, 孔德良, 郭大立. 鼎湖山9种常见树木细根组织N浓度的季节变化. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(11): 1106-1116. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01106
YIN Sen-Lu, KONG De-Liang, GUO Da-Li. Seasonal variation of fine root tissue N concentration of nine common tree species in Dinghushan, Guangdong, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(11): 1106-1116. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01106
物种 Species | 科 Family | 采样地点 Sampling plot | 样地林型 Stand type | 采样植株胸径 DBHof trees sampled (cm) | 表土(0-10 cm) N浓度 0-10 cm soil N concentration (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
木荷 Schima superba | 山茶科 Theaceae | 样地1 Plot 1 | 木荷-锥栗 Schima superba-Castanopsis chinensis | ≥15 | 1.11 |
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 紫金牛科 Podocarpaceae | 样地1 Plot 1 | 木荷-锥栗 Schima superba-Castanopsis chinensis | ≥3 | 1.11 |
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 樟科 Lauraceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | ≥20 | 3.59 |
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 樟科 Lauraceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | 5-15 | 3.59 |
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 茜草科 Rubiaceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | ≥10 | 3.59 |
红车 Syzygium hancei | 桃金娘科 Myrtaceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | ≥10 | 3.59 |
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 木兰科 Magnoliaceae | 样地3 Plot 3 | 火力楠-木荷-马尾松 Michelia macclurei-Schima superba-Pinus massoniana | ≥15 | 1.04 |
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 樟科 Lauraceae | 样地3 Plot 3 | 火力楠-马尾松-木荷 Michelia macclurei-Schima superba-Pinus massoniana | 3-5 | 1.04 |
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 苏木科 Hypericaceae | 样地4 Plot 4 | 樟树-鼎湖血桐-水翁 Cinnamomum camphora-Macaranga sampsonii- Cleistocalyx operculatus | 5-10 | 2.64 |
表1 物种和样地
Table 1 Species and sampling plot
物种 Species | 科 Family | 采样地点 Sampling plot | 样地林型 Stand type | 采样植株胸径 DBHof trees sampled (cm) | 表土(0-10 cm) N浓度 0-10 cm soil N concentration (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
木荷 Schima superba | 山茶科 Theaceae | 样地1 Plot 1 | 木荷-锥栗 Schima superba-Castanopsis chinensis | ≥15 | 1.11 |
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 紫金牛科 Podocarpaceae | 样地1 Plot 1 | 木荷-锥栗 Schima superba-Castanopsis chinensis | ≥3 | 1.11 |
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 樟科 Lauraceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | ≥20 | 3.59 |
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 樟科 Lauraceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | 5-15 | 3.59 |
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 茜草科 Rubiaceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | ≥10 | 3.59 |
红车 Syzygium hancei | 桃金娘科 Myrtaceae | 样地2 Plot 2 | 木荷-厚壳桂-黄果厚壳桂 Schima superba-Cryptocarya chinensis-Cryptocarya concinna | ≥10 | 3.59 |
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 木兰科 Magnoliaceae | 样地3 Plot 3 | 火力楠-木荷-马尾松 Michelia macclurei-Schima superba-Pinus massoniana | ≥15 | 1.04 |
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 樟科 Lauraceae | 样地3 Plot 3 | 火力楠-马尾松-木荷 Michelia macclurei-Schima superba-Pinus massoniana | 3-5 | 1.04 |
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 苏木科 Hypericaceae | 样地4 Plot 4 | 樟树-鼎湖血桐-水翁 Cinnamomum camphora-Macaranga sampsonii- Cleistocalyx operculatus | 5-10 | 2.64 |
物种 Species | 采样时间 Sampling time (year-month) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010-1 | 2010-4 | 2010-6 | 2010-8 | 2010-10 | 2011-1 | |
木荷 Schima superba | 新叶 New leaves | 结果 Fruition | 落叶 Leaf fall | |||
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 花期 Florescence | |||||
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
红车 Syzygium hancei | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 花期 Florescence | 新叶 New leaves | 花期 Florescence | |||
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 落叶/花期 Leaf fall/florescence | 新叶/结果 New leaves/fruition | 落叶/结果 Leaf fall/ fruition | |||
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 新叶 New leaves |
表2 树种物候信息
Table 2 Penology of species sampled
物种 Species | 采样时间 Sampling time (year-month) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010-1 | 2010-4 | 2010-6 | 2010-8 | 2010-10 | 2011-1 | |
木荷 Schima superba | 新叶 New leaves | 结果 Fruition | 落叶 Leaf fall | |||
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 花期 Florescence | |||||
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
红车 Syzygium hancei | 新叶 New leaves | |||||
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 花期 Florescence | 新叶 New leaves | 花期 Florescence | |||
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 落叶/花期 Leaf fall/florescence | 新叶/结果 New leaves/fruition | 落叶/结果 Leaf fall/ fruition | |||
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 新叶 New leaves |
树种 Species | 根级 Root order | 根直径 Root diameter (mm) | 根长度 Root length (cm) | 比根长 Specific root length (m·g-1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木荷 Schima superba | 1 | 0.20 (0.03) | 0.26 (0.10) | 46.78 | ||||||
2 | 0.25 (0.05) | 0.70 (0.29) | 36.38 | |||||||
3 | 0.32 (0.05) | 2.25 (0.75) | 35.28 | |||||||
4 | 0.52 (0.10) | 3.53 (2.02) | 17.08 | |||||||
5 | 0.96 (0.19) | 4.94 (1.92) | 5.51 | |||||||
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 1 | 0.44 (0.05) | 1.02 (0.43) | 15.13 | ||||||
2 | 0.53 (0.08) | 2.39 (1.00) | 11.10 | |||||||
3 | 0.74 (0.09) | 5.51 (1.73) | 3.28 | |||||||
4 | 1.08 (0.08) | 15.25 (3.77) | 1.50 | |||||||
5 | 1.59 (0.14) | 22.34 (5.19) | 0.70 | |||||||
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 1 | 0.83 (0.11) | 1.75 (0.84) | 7.51 | ||||||
2 | 1.00 (0.15) | 4.97 (2.75) | 7.57 | |||||||
3 | 1.31 (0.16) | 13.49 (4.15) | 2.51 | |||||||
4 | 1.54 (0.15) | 34.06 (11.43) | 1.61 | |||||||
5 | 2.10 (0.45) | 90.13 (15.63) | 0.70 | |||||||
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 1 | 0.46 (0.08) | 0.82 (0.31) | 12.83 | ||||||
2 | 0.64 (0.11) | 2.43 (0.91) | 7.39 | |||||||
3 | 0.83 (0.14) | 5.99 (3.13) | 4.38 | |||||||
4 | 1.11 (0.23) | 12.40 (4.47) | 1.60 | |||||||
5 | 1.73 (0.22) | 32.85 (11.99) | 0.71 | |||||||
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 1 | 0.53 (0.06) | 1.00 (0.41) | 11.98 | ||||||
2 | 0.62 (0.07) | 2.20 (0.99) | 8.52 | |||||||
3 | 0.73 (0.13) | 5.47 (2.79) | 5.34 | |||||||
4 | 1.02 (0.12) | 11.17 (8.59) | 2.38 | |||||||
5 | 1.65 (0.10) | 19.32 (8.87) | 0.53 | |||||||
红车 Syzygium hancei | 1 | 0.17 (0.02) | 0.22 (0.05) | 61.36 | ||||||
2 | 0.22 (0.03) | 1.04 (0.22) | 52.05 | |||||||
3 | 0.32 (0.07) | 2.30 (0.53) | 20.68 | |||||||
4 | 0.49 (0.06) | 5.49 (1.27) | 12.43 | |||||||
5 | 0.98 (0.24) | 8.67 (3.28) | 3.82 | |||||||
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 1 | 0.58 (0.09) | 1.08 (0.37) | 19.59 | ||||||
2 | 0.65 (0.08) | 2.07 (0.73) | 12.37 | |||||||
3 | 0.79 (0.13) | 4.36 (2.28) | 4.24 | |||||||
4 | 1.03 (0.18) | 8.32 (2.68) | 3.40 | |||||||
5 | 1.75 (0.34) | 15.78 (4.02) | 1.29 | |||||||
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 1 | 0.46 (0.08) | 0.56 (0.18) | 15.65 | ||||||
2 | 0.61 (0.07) | 1.88 (0.59) | 11.93 | |||||||
3 | 0.86 (0.10) | 4.58 (0.84) | 7.83 | |||||||
4 | 1.08 (0.14) | 9.09 (2.65) | 1.83 | |||||||
5 | 1.57 (0.22) | 28.49 (5.19) | 0.63 | |||||||
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 1 | 0.29 (0.04) | 1.17 (0.36) | 35.78 | ||||||
2 | 0.35 (0.07) | 2.33 (0.62) | 21.81 | |||||||
3 | 0.45 (0.07) | 2.84 (0.70) | 14.49 | |||||||
4 | 0.52 (0.09) | 4.36 (0.96) | 10.09 | |||||||
5 | 0.78 (0.11) | 7.44 (1.55) | 4.63 |
表3 9个树种不同根级的形态属性
Table 3 Morphological traits of nine tree species according to root order
树种 Species | 根级 Root order | 根直径 Root diameter (mm) | 根长度 Root length (cm) | 比根长 Specific root length (m·g-1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木荷 Schima superba | 1 | 0.20 (0.03) | 0.26 (0.10) | 46.78 | ||||||
2 | 0.25 (0.05) | 0.70 (0.29) | 36.38 | |||||||
3 | 0.32 (0.05) | 2.25 (0.75) | 35.28 | |||||||
4 | 0.52 (0.10) | 3.53 (2.02) | 17.08 | |||||||
5 | 0.96 (0.19) | 4.94 (1.92) | 5.51 | |||||||
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 1 | 0.44 (0.05) | 1.02 (0.43) | 15.13 | ||||||
2 | 0.53 (0.08) | 2.39 (1.00) | 11.10 | |||||||
3 | 0.74 (0.09) | 5.51 (1.73) | 3.28 | |||||||
4 | 1.08 (0.08) | 15.25 (3.77) | 1.50 | |||||||
5 | 1.59 (0.14) | 22.34 (5.19) | 0.70 | |||||||
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 1 | 0.83 (0.11) | 1.75 (0.84) | 7.51 | ||||||
2 | 1.00 (0.15) | 4.97 (2.75) | 7.57 | |||||||
3 | 1.31 (0.16) | 13.49 (4.15) | 2.51 | |||||||
4 | 1.54 (0.15) | 34.06 (11.43) | 1.61 | |||||||
5 | 2.10 (0.45) | 90.13 (15.63) | 0.70 | |||||||
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 1 | 0.46 (0.08) | 0.82 (0.31) | 12.83 | ||||||
2 | 0.64 (0.11) | 2.43 (0.91) | 7.39 | |||||||
3 | 0.83 (0.14) | 5.99 (3.13) | 4.38 | |||||||
4 | 1.11 (0.23) | 12.40 (4.47) | 1.60 | |||||||
5 | 1.73 (0.22) | 32.85 (11.99) | 0.71 | |||||||
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 1 | 0.53 (0.06) | 1.00 (0.41) | 11.98 | ||||||
2 | 0.62 (0.07) | 2.20 (0.99) | 8.52 | |||||||
3 | 0.73 (0.13) | 5.47 (2.79) | 5.34 | |||||||
4 | 1.02 (0.12) | 11.17 (8.59) | 2.38 | |||||||
5 | 1.65 (0.10) | 19.32 (8.87) | 0.53 | |||||||
红车 Syzygium hancei | 1 | 0.17 (0.02) | 0.22 (0.05) | 61.36 | ||||||
2 | 0.22 (0.03) | 1.04 (0.22) | 52.05 | |||||||
3 | 0.32 (0.07) | 2.30 (0.53) | 20.68 | |||||||
4 | 0.49 (0.06) | 5.49 (1.27) | 12.43 | |||||||
5 | 0.98 (0.24) | 8.67 (3.28) | 3.82 | |||||||
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 1 | 0.58 (0.09) | 1.08 (0.37) | 19.59 | ||||||
2 | 0.65 (0.08) | 2.07 (0.73) | 12.37 | |||||||
3 | 0.79 (0.13) | 4.36 (2.28) | 4.24 | |||||||
4 | 1.03 (0.18) | 8.32 (2.68) | 3.40 | |||||||
5 | 1.75 (0.34) | 15.78 (4.02) | 1.29 | |||||||
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 1 | 0.46 (0.08) | 0.56 (0.18) | 15.65 | ||||||
2 | 0.61 (0.07) | 1.88 (0.59) | 11.93 | |||||||
3 | 0.86 (0.10) | 4.58 (0.84) | 7.83 | |||||||
4 | 1.08 (0.14) | 9.09 (2.65) | 1.83 | |||||||
5 | 1.57 (0.22) | 28.49 (5.19) | 0.63 | |||||||
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 1 | 0.29 (0.04) | 1.17 (0.36) | 35.78 | ||||||
2 | 0.35 (0.07) | 2.33 (0.62) | 21.81 | |||||||
3 | 0.45 (0.07) | 2.84 (0.70) | 14.49 | |||||||
4 | 0.52 (0.09) | 4.36 (0.96) | 10.09 | |||||||
5 | 0.78 (0.11) | 7.44 (1.55) | 4.63 |
图1 9个树种各根级N浓度的季节变化(平均值±标准误差)。Scsu, 木荷; Arqu, 罗伞; Crch, 厚壳桂; Crco, 黄果厚壳桂; Cadi, 鱼骨木; Syha, 红车; Mina, 火力楠; Licu, 山鸡椒; Altu, 鼎湖合欢。
Fig. 1 Seasonal variations of root tissue N concentrations of nine tree species (mean ± SE). Scsu, Schima superba; Arqu, Ardisia quinquegona; Crch, Cryptocarya chinensis; Crco, Cryptocarya concinna; Cadi, Canthium dicoccum; Syha, Syzygium hancei; Mina, Michelia macclurei; Licu, Listea cubeba; Altu, Albizia turgida.
物种 Species | SV(%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根级 Root order | 平均值 Mean | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
木荷 Schima superba | 2.17 | 2.89 | 7.17 | 4.74 | 2.19 | 3.83 |
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 5.26* | 6.85* | 19.39* | 11.95* | 7.48* | 10.19 |
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 4.78* | 10.42* | 26* | 16.43* | 21.8* | 15.89 |
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 9.92* | 16.33* | 15.56* | 20.48* | 15.73* | 15.60 |
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 2.78 | 3.61 | 8.83 | 12.95* | 13.12* | 8.26 |
红车 Syzygium hancei | 1.62 | 7.28 | 5.00 | 7.18 | 4.80 | 5.18 |
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 3.99* | 9.32 | 9.73* | 12.86* | 5.03 | 8.19 |
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 10.24* | 13.81* | 20.72* | 24.33* | 11.64* | 16.15 |
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 8.88* | 9.62* | 13.44* | 13.40* | 19.97* | 13.06 |
平均值 Mean | 5.27 | 8.30 | 13.27 | 13.37 | 11.23 | 10.29 |
表4 9个树种5个根级N浓度的季节变化(SV)
Table 4 Seasonal variation of root tissue N concentrations (SV) of five root orders in nine tree species
物种 Species | SV(%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根级 Root order | 平均值 Mean | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
木荷 Schima superba | 2.17 | 2.89 | 7.17 | 4.74 | 2.19 | 3.83 |
罗伞 Ardisia quinquegona | 5.26* | 6.85* | 19.39* | 11.95* | 7.48* | 10.19 |
厚壳桂 Cryptocarya chinensis | 4.78* | 10.42* | 26* | 16.43* | 21.8* | 15.89 |
黄果厚壳桂 Cryptocarya concinna | 9.92* | 16.33* | 15.56* | 20.48* | 15.73* | 15.60 |
鱼骨木 Canthium dicoccum | 2.78 | 3.61 | 8.83 | 12.95* | 13.12* | 8.26 |
红车 Syzygium hancei | 1.62 | 7.28 | 5.00 | 7.18 | 4.80 | 5.18 |
火力楠 Michelia macclurei | 3.99* | 9.32 | 9.73* | 12.86* | 5.03 | 8.19 |
山鸡椒 Listea cubeba | 10.24* | 13.81* | 20.72* | 24.33* | 11.64* | 16.15 |
鼎湖合欢 Albizia turgida | 8.88* | 9.62* | 13.44* | 13.40* | 19.97* | 13.06 |
平均值 Mean | 5.27 | 8.30 | 13.27 | 13.37 | 11.23 | 10.29 |
相关性 Correlation | p值 p value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
直径×季节变化 Diameter × SV | 0.333 | 0.485 | 0.656 | 0.82 | 0.961 |
组织N浓度×季节变化 Tissue N concentration × SV | 0.525 | 0.259 | 0.782 | 0.635 | 0.271 |
表5 根级N浓度季节变化(SV)与根直径、N浓度相关性分析结果
Table 5 Analysis results of seasonal variation of root tissue N concentrations (SV) vs. root diameter and tissue N concentrations
相关性 Correlation | p值 p value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
直径×季节变化 Diameter × SV | 0.333 | 0.485 | 0.656 | 0.82 | 0.961 |
组织N浓度×季节变化 Tissue N concentration × SV | 0.525 | 0.259 | 0.782 | 0.635 | 0.271 |
[1] | Bloomfield J, Vogt KA, Wargo PM (1996). Tree root turnover and senescence. In: Wiasel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U eds. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. 363-381. |
[2] | Böhm W (1979). Methods of Studying Root Systems (Ecological Studies,V33). Springer-Verlag, Berlin. |
[3] |
Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS (2003). Field measurements of root respiration indicate no seasonal temperature acclimation for sugar maple and red pine. Tree Physiology, 23,273-280.
URL PMID |
[4] |
Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL, Allen MF (2002). Root respiration in North American forests: effects of nitrogen concentration and temperature across biomes. Oecologia, 131,559-568.
DOI URL PMID |
[5] | Chang WJ (常文静), Guo DL (郭大立) (2008). Variation in root diameter among 45 common tree species in temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 32,1248-1257. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | De Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD (2008). Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecology Letters, 11,516-531. |
[7] |
Guo DL, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ (2004). Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia, 140,450-457.
DOI URL PMID |
[8] |
Guo DL, Mitchell RJ, Withington JM, Fan PP, Hendricks JJ (2008a). Endogenous and exogenous controls of root life span, mortality and nitrogen flux in a longleaf pine forest: root branch order predominates. Journal of Ecology, 96,737-745.
DOI URL PMID |
[9] | Guo DL, Xia MX, Wei X, Chang WJ, Liu Y, Wang ZQ (2008b). Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist, 180,673-683. |
[10] | He JH (何金海), Chen ZQ (陈兆其), Liang YE (梁永奀) (1982). The soil of Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve. Tropical and Subtropical Forest Ecosystem (热带亚热带森林生态系统研究), (1),25-37. (in Chinese) |
[11] | Hedin LO, Jack Brookshire EN, Menge DNL, Barron AR (2009). The nitrogen paradox in tropical forest ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40,613-635. |
[12] | Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1993). Patterns of fine root mortality in two sugar maple forests. Nature, 361,59-61. |
[13] | Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1996). Applications of minirh- izotrons to understand root function in forests and other natural ecosystems. Plant and Soil, 185,293-304. |
[14] | Hendricks JJ, Hendrick RL, Wilson CA, Mitchell RJ, Pecot SD, Guo DL (2006). Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. Journal of Ecology, 94,40-57. |
[15] |
Jackson RB, Manwaring JH, Caldwell MM (1990). Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment. Nature, 344,58-60.
URL PMID |
[16] |
Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997). A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94,7362-7366.
URL PMID |
[17] | Kätterer T, Fabião A, Madeira M, Ribeiro C, Steen E (1995). Fine root dynamics, soil moisture and soil carbon content in Eucalyptus globulus plantation under different irrigation and fertilization regimes. Forest Ecology and Management, 74,1-12. |
[18] | Kuhns MR, Garrett HE, Teskey RO, Hinckley TM (1985). Root growth of black walnut trees related to soil temperature, soil water potential, and leaf water potential. Forest Science, 31,617-629. |
[19] | Li A, Guo DL, Wang ZQ, Liu HY (2010). Nitrogen and phosphorus allocation in leaves, twigs, and fine roots across 49 temperate, subtropical and tropical tree species: a hierarchical pattern. Functional Ecology, 24,224-232. |
[20] | Lü MH (吕明和), Zhou GY (周国逸), Zhang DQ (张德强) (2006). Decomposition of Cryptocarya concinna coarse woody debris (CWD) in Dinghushan. Guihaia (广西植物), 26,523-529. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Lyford WH (1975). Rhizography of non-woody roots of trees in the forest floor. In: Torrey JG, Clarkson DT eds. The Development and Function of Roots. Academic Press, New York. 179-196. |
[22] | MacDonald NW, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS (1995). Temperature effects on kinetics of microbial respiration and net nitrogen and sulfur mineralization. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59,233-240. |
[23] | McClaugherty CA, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1982). The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology, 63,1481-1490. |
[24] | Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1985). Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen availability: a new hypothesis. Ecology, 66,1377-1390. |
[25] | Nambiar EKS (1987). Do nutrients retranslocate from fine roots? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17,913-918. |
[26] | Peng SL (彭少麟), Fang W (方炜), Ren H (任海), Huang ZL (黄忠良), Kong GH (孔国辉), Yu QF (余清发), Zhang DQ (张德强) (1998). The dynamics on organization in the successional process of Dinghushan Cryptocarya community. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 22,245-249. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002). Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecological Monographs, 72,293-309. |
[28] |
Pregitzer KS, Kubiske ME, Yu CK, Hendrick RL (1997). Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species. Oecologia, 111,302-308.
DOI URL PMID |
[29] | Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Maziasz J, DeForest J, Curtis PS, Lussenhop J (2000). The interactive effects of atmospheric CO 2 and soil-N availability on fine roots of Populus tremulodies. Ecological Applications, 10,18-33. |
[30] |
Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Pregitzer KS, Wright IJ, Oleksyn J, Machado JL (2008). Scaling of respiration to nitrogen in leaves, stems and roots of higher land plants. Ecology Letters, 11,793-801.
DOI URL PMID |
[31] |
Reich PB, Walters MB, Tjoelker MG, Vanderklein D, Buschena C (1998). Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate. Functional Ecology, 12,395-405.
DOI URL |
[32] | Robinson D, Hodge A, Fitter AH (2003). Constraints on the form and function of root systems. In: de Kroon H, Visser EJW eds. Root Ecology. Springer, Heidelberg. 1-31. |
[33] |
Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM (1998). Nutrient acquisition from soils with patchy nutrient distributions as assessed with simulation models. Ecology, 79,2735-2744.
DOI URL |
[34] |
Silver WL, Vogt KA (1993). Fine root dynamics following single and multiple disturbances in a subtropical wet forest ecosystem. Journal of Ecology, 81,729-738.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Trumbore SE, Gaudinski JB (2003). The secret lives of roots. Science, 302,1344-1345.
DOI URL PMID |
[36] |
Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Raich JW, Russell AE (2007). Fine-root mass, growth and nitrogen content for six tropical tree species. Plant and Soil, 290,357-370.
DOI URL |
[37] | Vogt KA, Grier CC, Vogt DJ (1986). Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Advances in Ecological Research, 15,303-377. |
[38] |
Vogt KA, Publicover DA, Bloomfield J, Perez JM, Vogt DJ, Silver WL (1993). Belowground responses as indicators of environmental change. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 33,189-205.
DOI URL |
[39] | Wang ZQ, Guo DL, Wang XR, Gu JC, Mei L (2006). Fine root architecture, morphology, and biomass of different branch orders of two Chinese temperate tree species. Plant and Soil, 288,151-171. |
[40] |
Wells CE, Eissenstat DM (2001). Marked differences in survivorship among apple roots of different diameters. Ecology, 82,882-892.
DOI URL |
[41] | Wells CE, Eissenstat DM (2003). Beyond the roots of young seedlings: the influence of age and order on fine root physiology. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 21,324-334. |
[42] |
Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006). Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21,261-268.
URL PMID |
[43] | Xia MX, Guo DL, Pregitzer KS (2010). Ephemeral root modules in Fraxinus mandshurica. New Phytologist, 188,1065-1074. |
[44] | Yang LY (杨丽韫), Li WH (李文华) (2005). Fine root distribution and turnover in a broad-leaved and Korean pine climax forest of the Changbai Mountain in China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 27(2),1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[45] | Yu SQ (于水强), Wang ZQ (王政权), Shi JW (史建伟), Quan XK (全先奎), Mei L (梅莉), Sun Y (孙玥), Jia SX (贾淑霞), Yu LZ (于立忠) (2007). Estimating fine-root longevity of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii using mini-rhizotrons. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 31,102-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[46] |
Zogg GP, Zak DR, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS (1996). Fine root respiration in northern hardwood forest in relation to temperature and nitrogen availability. Tree Physiology, 16,719-725.
DOI URL PMID |
[1] | 付粱晨, 丁宗巨, 唐茂, 曾辉, 朱彪. 北京东灵山白桦和蒙古栎的根际效应及其季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 508-522. |
[2] | 杜婷, 陈玉莲, 毕境徽, 杨玉婷, 张丽, 游成铭, 谭波, 徐振锋, 王丽霞, 刘思凝, 李晗. 林窗对川西亚高山凋落叶总酚和缩合单宁损失动态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 660-671. |
[3] | 刘美君, 陈秋文, 吕金林, 李国庆, 杜盛. 黄土丘陵区辽东栎和刺槐树干径向生长与微变化季节动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 227-237. |
[4] | 熊星烁, 蔡宏宇, 李耀琪, 马文红, 牛克昌, 陈迪马, 刘娜娜, 苏香燕, 景鹤影, 冯晓娟, 曾辉, 王志恒. 内蒙古典型草原植物叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征的季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11): 1138-1153. |
[5] | 李建军, 刘恋, 陈迪马, 许丰伟, 程军回, 白永飞. 底座入土深度和面积对典型草原土壤呼吸测定结果的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(2): 152-164. |
[6] | 王薪琪, 韩轶, 王传宽. 帽儿山不同林龄落叶阔叶林土壤微生物生物量及其季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(6): 597-609. |
[7] | 张建华, 唐志尧, 沈海花, 方精云. 北京东灵山地区常见灌丛生长及凋落物生产对氮添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(1): 71-80. |
[8] | 熊鑫, 张慧玲, 吴建平, 褚国伟, 周国逸, 张德强. 鼎湖山森林演替序列植物-土壤碳氮同位素特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6): 533-542. |
[9] | 刘洋, 张健, 闫帮国, 黄旭, 徐振锋, 吴福忠. 青藏高原东缘高山森林-苔原交错带土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和可培养微生物数量的季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(5): 382-392. |
[10] | 江浩, 周国逸, 黄钰辉, 刘世忠, 唐旭利. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林林冠不同部位藤本植物的光合生理特征及其对环境因子的适应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(5): 567-576. |
[11] | 刘效东, 乔玉娜, 周国逸. 土壤有机质对土壤水分保持及其有效性的控制作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(12): 1209-1218. |
[12] | 王迪海, 赵忠, 李剑. 土壤水分对黄土高原主要造林树种细根表面积 季节动态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(7): 819-826. |
[13] | 叶万辉, 曹洪麟, 黄忠良, 练琚愉, 王志高, 李林, 魏识广, 王章明. 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林20公顷样地群落特征研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 274-286. |
[14] | 旷远文, 温达志, 周国逸, 张德强. 鼎湖山异龄马尾松针叶长度序列元素分布[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 33-39. |
[15] | 唐旭利, 周国逸. 南亚热带典型森林演替类型粗死木质残体贮量及其对碳循环的潜在影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(4): 559-568. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19