植物生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 1148-1155.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01148
耿云霞(), 李依玲, 朱莎, 朱精精, 姜俊丞, 牛洪昊, 介冬梅**(
)
收稿日期:
2011-04-15
接受日期:
2011-07-07
出版日期:
2011-04-15
发布日期:
2011-11-07
通讯作者:
介冬梅
作者简介:
**(E-mail:jiedongmei@nenu.edu.cn)
GENG Yun-Xia(), LI Yi-Ling, ZHU Sha, ZHU Jing-Jing, JIANG Jun-Cheng, NIU Hong-Hao, JIE Dong-Mei**(
)
Received:
2011-04-15
Accepted:
2011-07-07
Online:
2011-04-15
Published:
2011-11-07
Contact:
JIE Dong-Mei
摘要:
对6个不同盐碱度梯度环境的羊草(Leymus chinensis)群落中生长状况良好的羊草进行人工筛选, 选取其中长势相近、叶片大小一致的羊草叶片, 用湿式灰化法提取植硅体并对其进行分类和命名, 共统计植硅体3387粒, 鉴定出植硅体类型10类, 分别是平顶帽型、尖顶帽型、刺帽型、光滑棒型、刺棒型、似牛角棒型、尖型、板型、蜂窝状和其他类型。随着盐碱浓度的增加, 帽型、棒型、尖型、板型和蜂窝型都有不同程度的变化。帽型植硅体的百分含量都有不同程度的增加, 6组样品中同种形态植硅体的大小有一定差别, 植硅体的大小随着盐碱度的升高呈现出不同程度的变化, 总体上有增大的趋势。
耿云霞, 李依玲, 朱莎, 朱精精, 姜俊丞, 牛洪昊, 介冬梅. 盐碱胁迫下羊草植硅体的形态变化. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(11): 1148-1155. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01148
GENG Yun-Xia, LI Yi-Ling, ZHU Sha, ZHU Jing-Jing, JIANG Jun-Cheng, NIU Hong-Hao, JIE Dong-Mei. Morphological changes of phytoliths in Leymus chinensis under saline-alkali stress. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(11): 1148-1155. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01148
样地 Sampling site | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 10.39 ± 0.3 | 10.39 ± 0.3 | 10.39 ± 0.3 | 10.42 ± 0.4 | 10.53 ± 0.3 | 10.52 ± 0.3 |
电导率 Electric conductivity (μs·cm-1) | 7 850 ± 25 | 7 850 ± 30 | 6 100 ± 18 | 4 550 ± 15 | 2 850 ± 15 | 1 570 ± 10 |
表1 6个不同盐碱样地对应的pH值和电导率(平均值±标准误差)
Table 1 pH and the electric conductivity of six different salinity samples (mean ± SE)
样地 Sampling site | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 10.39 ± 0.3 | 10.39 ± 0.3 | 10.39 ± 0.3 | 10.42 ± 0.4 | 10.53 ± 0.3 | 10.52 ± 0.3 |
电导率 Electric conductivity (μs·cm-1) | 7 850 ± 25 | 7 850 ± 30 | 6 100 ± 18 | 4 550 ± 15 | 2 850 ± 15 | 1 570 ± 10 |
图1 实验中观察到的羊草植硅体。A, B, 平顶帽型。C, 刺帽型。D, 蜂窝型。E, 似牛角棒型。F, 无底座尖型。G, K, 有底座尖型。H, 光滑棒型。I, J, 尖顶帽型。L, 板型。M, 刺棒型。
Fig. 1 Microphotographs of phytolith observed. A, B, Rondel flat. C, Rondel echinate. D, Favose. E, Elongate horn-ends. F, Point no plateau. G, K, Point plateau. H, Elongate smooth. I, J, Rondel ridge. L, Tabular. M, Elongate echinate.
图2 5种主要植硅体百分含量的变化。1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 样地编号, 同表1。
Fig. 2 Variation of percentage of five main types of phytolith. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, sample plot number, see Table 1.
图3 两种帽型植硅体百分含量的变化。1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 样地编号, 同表1。
Fig. 3 Variation of percentage of two types of rondel phytolith. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, sample plot number, see Table 1.
类型 Type | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
帽型 Rondel | 54.6 | 65.5 | 71.6 | 67.2 | 68.3 | 74.8 | |||||||
平顶帽型 Rondel flat | 29.6 | 34.4 | 36.9 | 35.8 | 29.8 | 38.1 | |||||||
尖顶帽型 Rondel ridge | 23.8 | 29.0 | 33.3 | 29.7 | 37.1 | 35.8 | |||||||
刺帽型 Rondel echinate | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0.9 | |||||||
棒型 Elongate | 18.3 | 7.3 | 10.2 | 10.3 | 6.5 | 9.1 | |||||||
光滑棒型 Elongate smooth | 7.6 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.2 | |||||||
刺棒型 Elongate echinate | 10.7 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 4.7 | |||||||
似牛角棒型 Elongate horn-ends | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |||||||
尖型 Point | 13.6 | 19.6 | 9.0 | 11.0 | 14.3 | 8.4 | |||||||
板型 Tabular | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | |||||||
蜂窝状 Favose | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | |||||||
其他 Others | 9.6 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 10.6 | 8.7 | 5.1 | |||||||
百分含量 Percentage | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||
总数 Total | 449 | 634 | 542 | 464 | 726 | 572 |
表2 羊草叶片中植硅体类型百分含量(%)
Table 2 Percentage of types of phytolith in Leymus chinensis leaves (%)
类型 Type | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
帽型 Rondel | 54.6 | 65.5 | 71.6 | 67.2 | 68.3 | 74.8 | |||||||
平顶帽型 Rondel flat | 29.6 | 34.4 | 36.9 | 35.8 | 29.8 | 38.1 | |||||||
尖顶帽型 Rondel ridge | 23.8 | 29.0 | 33.3 | 29.7 | 37.1 | 35.8 | |||||||
刺帽型 Rondel echinate | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0.9 | |||||||
棒型 Elongate | 18.3 | 7.3 | 10.2 | 10.3 | 6.5 | 9.1 | |||||||
光滑棒型 Elongate smooth | 7.6 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.2 | |||||||
刺棒型 Elongate echinate | 10.7 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 4.7 | |||||||
似牛角棒型 Elongate horn-ends | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |||||||
尖型 Point | 13.6 | 19.6 | 9.0 | 11.0 | 14.3 | 8.4 | |||||||
板型 Tabular | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | |||||||
蜂窝状 Favose | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | |||||||
其他 Others | 9.6 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 10.6 | 8.7 | 5.1 | |||||||
百分含量 Percentage | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||
总数 Total | 449 | 634 | 542 | 464 | 726 | 572 |
类型 Type | 样品Sample | a (μm) 平均值±标准误差 Mean ±SD | 值域 Range | b (μm) 平均值±标准误差 Mean ±SD | 值域 Range | c(μm) 平均值±标准误差 Mean ± SD | 值域 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
帽型 Rondel 平顶帽型 Rondel flat 尖顶帽型 Rondel ridge 刺帽型 Rondel echinate | 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 14.7 ± 3.3 14.6 ± 2.8 14.5 ± 2.5 14.9 ± 2.9 13.7 ± 2.9 12.8 ± 2.7 12.8 ± 2.3 11.8 ± 1.0 14.2 ± 2.2 13.8 ± 2.5 12.2 ± 2.2 11.9 ± 2.1 13.8 ± 2.3 14.1 ± 2.6 15.4 ± 2.7 15.4 ± 3.4 14.4 ± 5.2 12.7 ± 3.5 | 7.2-33.6 8.1-24.3 9.7-24.9 8.6-25.8 9.5-24.5 8.1-25.4 8.3-19.9 8.5-18.1 9.2-21.3 8.5-24.4 7.4-26.5 8.6-19.9 12.5-17.5 9.8-18.2 11-19.9 6-16.4 9.1-26.5 9.2-18.4 | 10.7 ± 3.3 9.7 ± 2.9 10.7 ± 3.0 11.2 ± 3.1 10.1 ± 2.8 10.1 ± 2.6 9.9 ± 2.3 9.3 ± 1.7 11.0 ± 2.2 10.7 ± 2.3 9.7 ± 2.5 10.2 ± 2.3 7.6 ± 1.2 7.3 ± 0.9 9.4 ± 1.7 8.2 ± 2.2 7.4 ± 2.1 9.5 ± 4.1 | 2.7-24.8 3.6-18.0 3.0-20.2 3.3-22.9 4.8-18.3 4.2-21.7 4.0-16.9 4.5-14.5 3.5-17.7 3.7-18.0 3.8-26.6 4.5-16.7 5.6-7.8 5.4-9.2 8.3-13.4 5.4-10.9 4.6-12.0 6.3-15.3 | 7.2 ± 2.7 6.3 ± 1.8 7.3 ± 2.1 7.4 ± 2.3 6.7 ± 2.4 6.3 ± 2.2 8.2 ± 2.3 8.5 ± 2.1 8.9 ± 1.8 7.5 ± 2.4 7.7 ± 1.9 8.4 ± 2.3 | 2.0-14.0 2.3-12.6 2.7-11.8 3.2-13.1 1.9-13.8 2.2-13.3 1.9-13.9 4.2-14.2 5.3-13.7 4.5-14.2 2.7-12.4 3.2-14.8 |
棒型 Elongate 光滑棒型 Elongate smooth 刺棒型 Elongate echinate | 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 51.1 ± 24.6 60.4 ± 30.9 82.8 ± 45.7 70.2 ± 24.3 34.9 ± 36.9 98.3 ± 46.6 50.7 ± 17.2 75.7 ± 28.9 86.2 ± 35.1 48.5 ± 38.8 72.5 ± 38.3 106.8 ± 33.2 | 15.7-96.4 28.8-120.6 22.3-178.4 26.6-98.9 9.6-165.6 35.2-175.8 28.8-87.0 50.7-129.0 42.6-119.8 28.9-170.7 30.0-152.0 42.4-156.1 | 7.5 ± 3.3 9.4 ± 5.6 10.4 ± 5.4 10.5 ± 6.1 5.0 ± 4.5 7.0 ± 5.6 12.0 ± 3.5 13.6 ± 3.4 10.7 ± 4.2 10.1 ± 5.1 14.3 ± 4.3 9.8 ± 7.6 | 4.5-16.2 6.1-23.0 4.7-19.6 3.5-23.1 2.9-20.7 3.2-25.1 4.6-19.2 8.7-18.6 4.8-24.3 4.5-22.0 10.3-27.8 4.9-14.2 | ||
尖型 Point | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 16.5 ± 14.2 20.1 ± 13.8 21.9 ± 11.7 17.9 ± 11.5 12.7 ± 7.3 20.5 ± 9.6 | 6.0-79.1 6.3-62.7 7.5-61.1 7.5-60.7 4.2-52.47 9.2-48.9 | 10.0 ± 4.5 11.4 ± 7.5 12.4 ± 4.4 9.4 ± 5.3 7.2 ± 4.6 11.2 ± 6.6 | 4.3-23.1 3.6-55.8 4.5-23.7 3.9-27.8 3.0-39.2 5.4-36.5 | ||
板型 Tabular | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 24.0 ± 14.7 21.2 ± 7.0 27.5 ± 23.0 23.9 ± 5.2 21.3 ± 10.6 21.9 ± 11.3 | 12.6-53.7 10.5-35.7 14.6-78.3 20.2-27.6 13.6-45.9 14.0-44.3 | 13.2 ± 5.3 11.2 ± 6.4 15.8 ± 7.7 13.2 ± 0.4 13.1 ± 5.1 15.1 ± 7.3 | 8.0-25.2 7.6-24.8 10.4-30.5 12.9-13.5 7.4-24.8 8.6-32.6 | ||
蜂窝 Favose | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 26.6 ± 6.7 33.6 ± 7.5 31.7 ± 23.4 29.3 ± 4.5 32.3 ± 4.3 45.8 ± 8.1 | 18.8-36.5 31.0-45.1 20.6-72.0 26.1-32.4 26.1-32.4 37.5-60.3 | 17.0 ± 6.4 23.5 ± 3.6 20.0 ± 4.0 23.0 ± 1.2 23.6 ± 3.4 28.0 ± 8.9 | 13.3-27.9 21.3-28.3 14.6-23.5 22.1-23.8 16.3-24.7 25.3-45.2 |
表3 植硅体主要类型的形态大小
Table 3 Size of main types of phytolith
类型 Type | 样品Sample | a (μm) 平均值±标准误差 Mean ±SD | 值域 Range | b (μm) 平均值±标准误差 Mean ±SD | 值域 Range | c(μm) 平均值±标准误差 Mean ± SD | 值域 Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
帽型 Rondel 平顶帽型 Rondel flat 尖顶帽型 Rondel ridge 刺帽型 Rondel echinate | 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 14.7 ± 3.3 14.6 ± 2.8 14.5 ± 2.5 14.9 ± 2.9 13.7 ± 2.9 12.8 ± 2.7 12.8 ± 2.3 11.8 ± 1.0 14.2 ± 2.2 13.8 ± 2.5 12.2 ± 2.2 11.9 ± 2.1 13.8 ± 2.3 14.1 ± 2.6 15.4 ± 2.7 15.4 ± 3.4 14.4 ± 5.2 12.7 ± 3.5 | 7.2-33.6 8.1-24.3 9.7-24.9 8.6-25.8 9.5-24.5 8.1-25.4 8.3-19.9 8.5-18.1 9.2-21.3 8.5-24.4 7.4-26.5 8.6-19.9 12.5-17.5 9.8-18.2 11-19.9 6-16.4 9.1-26.5 9.2-18.4 | 10.7 ± 3.3 9.7 ± 2.9 10.7 ± 3.0 11.2 ± 3.1 10.1 ± 2.8 10.1 ± 2.6 9.9 ± 2.3 9.3 ± 1.7 11.0 ± 2.2 10.7 ± 2.3 9.7 ± 2.5 10.2 ± 2.3 7.6 ± 1.2 7.3 ± 0.9 9.4 ± 1.7 8.2 ± 2.2 7.4 ± 2.1 9.5 ± 4.1 | 2.7-24.8 3.6-18.0 3.0-20.2 3.3-22.9 4.8-18.3 4.2-21.7 4.0-16.9 4.5-14.5 3.5-17.7 3.7-18.0 3.8-26.6 4.5-16.7 5.6-7.8 5.4-9.2 8.3-13.4 5.4-10.9 4.6-12.0 6.3-15.3 | 7.2 ± 2.7 6.3 ± 1.8 7.3 ± 2.1 7.4 ± 2.3 6.7 ± 2.4 6.3 ± 2.2 8.2 ± 2.3 8.5 ± 2.1 8.9 ± 1.8 7.5 ± 2.4 7.7 ± 1.9 8.4 ± 2.3 | 2.0-14.0 2.3-12.6 2.7-11.8 3.2-13.1 1.9-13.8 2.2-13.3 1.9-13.9 4.2-14.2 5.3-13.7 4.5-14.2 2.7-12.4 3.2-14.8 |
棒型 Elongate 光滑棒型 Elongate smooth 刺棒型 Elongate echinate | 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 51.1 ± 24.6 60.4 ± 30.9 82.8 ± 45.7 70.2 ± 24.3 34.9 ± 36.9 98.3 ± 46.6 50.7 ± 17.2 75.7 ± 28.9 86.2 ± 35.1 48.5 ± 38.8 72.5 ± 38.3 106.8 ± 33.2 | 15.7-96.4 28.8-120.6 22.3-178.4 26.6-98.9 9.6-165.6 35.2-175.8 28.8-87.0 50.7-129.0 42.6-119.8 28.9-170.7 30.0-152.0 42.4-156.1 | 7.5 ± 3.3 9.4 ± 5.6 10.4 ± 5.4 10.5 ± 6.1 5.0 ± 4.5 7.0 ± 5.6 12.0 ± 3.5 13.6 ± 3.4 10.7 ± 4.2 10.1 ± 5.1 14.3 ± 4.3 9.8 ± 7.6 | 4.5-16.2 6.1-23.0 4.7-19.6 3.5-23.1 2.9-20.7 3.2-25.1 4.6-19.2 8.7-18.6 4.8-24.3 4.5-22.0 10.3-27.8 4.9-14.2 | ||
尖型 Point | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 16.5 ± 14.2 20.1 ± 13.8 21.9 ± 11.7 17.9 ± 11.5 12.7 ± 7.3 20.5 ± 9.6 | 6.0-79.1 6.3-62.7 7.5-61.1 7.5-60.7 4.2-52.47 9.2-48.9 | 10.0 ± 4.5 11.4 ± 7.5 12.4 ± 4.4 9.4 ± 5.3 7.2 ± 4.6 11.2 ± 6.6 | 4.3-23.1 3.6-55.8 4.5-23.7 3.9-27.8 3.0-39.2 5.4-36.5 | ||
板型 Tabular | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 24.0 ± 14.7 21.2 ± 7.0 27.5 ± 23.0 23.9 ± 5.2 21.3 ± 10.6 21.9 ± 11.3 | 12.6-53.7 10.5-35.7 14.6-78.3 20.2-27.6 13.6-45.9 14.0-44.3 | 13.2 ± 5.3 11.2 ± 6.4 15.8 ± 7.7 13.2 ± 0.4 13.1 ± 5.1 15.1 ± 7.3 | 8.0-25.2 7.6-24.8 10.4-30.5 12.9-13.5 7.4-24.8 8.6-32.6 | ||
蜂窝 Favose | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 26.6 ± 6.7 33.6 ± 7.5 31.7 ± 23.4 29.3 ± 4.5 32.3 ± 4.3 45.8 ± 8.1 | 18.8-36.5 31.0-45.1 20.6-72.0 26.1-32.4 26.1-32.4 37.5-60.3 | 17.0 ± 6.4 23.5 ± 3.6 20.0 ± 4.0 23.0 ± 1.2 23.6 ± 3.4 28.0 ± 8.9 | 13.3-27.9 21.3-28.3 14.6-23.5 22.1-23.8 16.3-24.7 25.3-45.2 |
[1] | Bin SY (宾淑英), Yao SM (姚圣梅), Lin JT (林进添), Feng ZX (冯志新) (1999). Some physiological changes of peanut plants infected with Meloidogyne arenaria. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (华中农业大学学报), 18,121-124. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Hu XW (胡小文), Wang YR (王彦荣), Wu YP (武艳培) (2004). Research progress on eco-physiological responses of desert grassland plants to drought conditions. Acta Prataculturae Sinica (草业学报), 13(3),9-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Huang F (黄翡), Lisa K, Huang FB (黄凤宝) (2004). Diagnostic phytoliths from Nei Mongol grassland. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica (古生物学报), 43,246-253. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Ji LM (吉利明), Chen JF (陈践发), Lai XL (赖旭龙), Wang J (王杰) (2002). Application of phytolith in reconstruction of loessial paleoclimate. Geology-Geochemistry (地质地球化学), 30,58-62. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Jiang QH (姜钦华), Liu JB (刘建波), Wang WH (王文华), (1994). A palynomorph and phytolith study of a Neolithic site in Yingyang, Dengfeng County, Henan Province and its implications. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis (北京大学学报(自然科学版)), 30,453-460. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Jiang XH (姜钦华), Zhang JK (张江凯) (1998). Phytolith evidence for rice cultivation during prehistoric periods at Baligang site of Baizhuang, Dengzhou City, Henan Province. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis (北京大学学报), 34,66-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Jie DM (介冬梅), Liu ZY (刘朝阳), Shi LX (石连旋), Liu HM (刘红梅), Ge Y (葛勇) (2010). Characteristics of phytoliths in Leymus chinensis from different habitats on the Songnen Plain in Northeast China and their environmental implications. Science in China (中国科学), 40,493-502. (in Chinese) |
[8] | Kondo R (近藤鍊三), Sase T (佐瀬隆) (1986). Opal phytoliths, their nature and application. Quatemary Science (第四纪研究), 25,31-63. (in Japanese with English summary). |
[9] | Li Q (李泉), Lü HY (吕厚远), Wang WM (王伟铭) (2009). Introduction and discussion on international code for Phytolith Nomenclature 1.0. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica (古生物学报), 48,131-138. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Lin QF (林栖凤), Li GY (李冠一) (2000). Research progress in salt tolerance in plants. Progress in Biotechnology (生物工程进展), 20,20-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Liu BZ (刘宝柱), Li CX (李从先), Ye ZZ (业治铮) (1995). Phytolith and its paleoenvironmental significance in the studies of late quaternary paleosols in the Yangtze delta area. Quaternary Science (第四纪研究), 15,15-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Liu DH (刘东焕), Zhao SW (赵世伟), Gao RF (高荣孚), Zhang ZS (张佐双), Jiang CD (姜闯道), Liu YJ (刘玉军) (2002). Response of plants photosynthesis to higher temperature. Bulletin of Botanical Research (植物研究), 22,205-210. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Lü HY (吕厚远), Jia JW (贾继伟), Wang WM (王伟铭), Wang YJ (王永吉), Liao GB (廖淦标) (2002). On the meaning of phytolith and its classification in Gramineae. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica (微体古生物学报), 19,389-396. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Lü HY (吕厚远), Liu DS (刘东生), Wu NQ (吴乃琴), Han JM (韩家懋), Guo ZT (郭正堂) (1999). Phytolith record of vegetation succession in the Southern Loess Plateau since late pleistocene. Quaternary Science (第四纪研究), 19,336-349. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Lü HY (吕厚远), Wu NQ (吴乃琴), Liu DS (刘东生), Han JM (韩家懋), Qin XG (秦小光), Sun XJ (孙湘君), Wang YJ (王永吉) (1996). Seasonal climatic variation recorded by phytolith assemblages from the Baoji loess sequence in central China over the last 150 000 a. Science in China (Series D) (中国科学D辑), 26,131-136. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Prat H (1936). La systematique des Graminees. Annales des Sciences, Naturelles, Botanique, Series 2. 18,165-258. |
[17] | Qin Y (秦颖), Yao ZG (姚政权), Wei GF (魏国锋), Hu YL (胡雅丽), Wang CS (王昌燧) (2008). Determining the foundry area of bronze vessels from Jiuliandun tombs based on phytolith analysis of casting core residue. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China (中国科学技术大学学报), 38,326-330. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Tang LH (汤陵华), Sato YI (佐藤洋一郎), Udatsu TT (宇田津彻朗), Sun JX (孙加祥) (1999). Types of the ancient rice subspecies cultivated in Caoxie Hill vestige of China. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences (江苏农业学报), 15,193-197. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Wang P (王萍), Yin LJ (殷立娟), Li JD (李建东) (1994). Studies on the adaptaeity and to lerance of Leymus chinensis to salinity in salinized grassland in the Songnei Plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 14,306-311. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Wang WM (王伟铭), Liu JL (刘金陵), Zhou XD (周晓丹) (2003). Climate indexes of phytoliths from Homo erectus’ cave deposits in Nanjing. Chinese Science Bulletin (科学通报), 48,1205-1208. (in Chinese) |
[21] | Wang Y (王艳), Li XL (李晓林), Zhang FS (张福锁) (2000). Current research on suitable mechanisms on different plant genotypes under phosphorous stress condition. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (生态农业研究), 8,34-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Wang YJ (王永吉), Lü HY (吕厚远) (1992). Phytolith Study and Its Application (植物硅酸体研究及应用). Ocean Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[23] | Wen DZ (温达志), Kong GH (孔国辉), Zhang DQ (张德强), Peng CL (彭长连), Zhang RF (张瑞凤), Li X (黎旭) (2003). Ecophysiological responses of 30 gardens plant species exposed to short-term air pollution. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27,311-317. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Wu NQ (吴乃琴), Lü HY (吕厚远), Sun XJ (孙湘君), Guo ZT (郭正堂), Liu JQ (刘嘉麒), Han JM (韩家懋) (1994). Phytolith-climate transfer functions at Weinan since the late glacial environmental studies of the ancient. Quaternary Science (第四纪研究), 14,270-277. (in Chinese) |
[25] | Xiong X (熊曦), Wu YQ (吴彦奇), Li X (李西) (2001). Progress of physiological and biochemical research on bermudagrass related to cold tolerance. Pratacultural Science (草业科学), 18,39-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Yan H (颜宏), Shi DC (石德成), Yin SJ (尹尚军), Zhao W (赵伟) (2000). Effects of saline-alkaline stress on the contents of nitrogen and several organisms of Aneurolepidium chinense. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition) (东北师范大学学报(自然科学版)), 32(3),47-52. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Yan H (颜宏), Zhao W (赵伟), Yin SJ (尹尚军), Shi DC (石德成), Zhou DW (周道玮) (2006). Different physiological responses of Aneurolepidium chinense to NaCl and Na 2CO 3. Acta Prataculturae Sinica (草业学报), 15,49-55. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Zhang NN (张楠楠), Xu XL (徐香玲) (2005). The study of the mechanism which the plants resist the salt. Natural Science Journal of Harbin Normal University (哈尔滨师范大学(自然科学学报)), 21,65-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | Zhang YL (张玉兰), Zhang MB (张敏斌), Song J (宋建) (2003). Development of ancestors’ cultivation revealed in phytolith assemblages from Guangfulin relics. Chinese Science Bulletin (科学通报), 48,287-290. (in Chinese) |
[30] | Zhou C (周婵), Yang YF (杨允菲), Li JD (李建东) (2002). Physiological response of two divergent Leymus chinensis types to drought stress in the Songnen Plain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 13,1109-1112. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Zhou C (周婵), Yang YF (杨允菲) (2003). Physiological response to salt-alkali stress in experimental populations in two ecotypes of Leymus chinensis in the Songnen Plains of China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 14,1842-1846. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 白皓然 侯盟 刘艳杰. 少花蒺藜草入侵与干旱对羊草草原生产力的影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 577-589. |
[2] | 代景忠, 白玉婷, 卫智军, 张楚, 辛晓平, 闫玉春, 闫瑞瑞. 羊草功能性状对施肥的动态响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 943-953. |
[3] | 刘建新, 刘瑞瑞, 刘秀丽, 贾海燕, 卜婷, 李娜. 外源硫化氢对盐碱胁迫下裸燕麦光合碳代谢的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 374-388. |
[4] | 代景忠, 白玉婷, 卫智军, 张楚, 闫瑞瑞. 切根对羊草营养生长期内植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1292-1302. |
[5] | 李颖, 龚吉蕊, 刘敏, 侯向阳, 丁勇, 杨波, 张子荷, 王彪, 朱趁趁. 不同放牧强度下内蒙古温带典型草原优势种植物防御策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 642-653. |
[6] | 郭瑞, 周际, 刘琪, 顾峰雪. 松嫩退化草地芦苇不同叶位叶片营养元素代谢特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 734-740. |
[7] | 张璐, 郝匕台, 齐丽雪, 李艳龙, 徐慧敏, 杨丽娜, 宝音陶格涛. 草原群落生物量和土壤有机质含量对改良措施的动态响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 317-326. |
[8] | 朱志成, 黄银, 许丰伟, 邢稳, 郑淑霞, 白永飞. 降雨强度和时间频次对内蒙古典型草原土壤氮矿化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(9): 938-952. |
[9] | 杨雪, 申俊芳, 赵念席, 高玉葆. 不同基因型羊草数量性状的可塑性及遗传分化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3): 359-368. |
[10] | 翟占伟, 龚吉蕊, 罗亲普, 潘琰, 宝音陶格涛, 徐沙, 刘敏, 杨丽丽. 氮添加对内蒙古温带草原羊草光合特性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(2): 196-208. |
[11] | 岑宇, 刘美珍. 凝结水对干旱胁迫下羊草和冰草生理生态特征及叶片形态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(11): 1199-1207. |
[12] | 李丹, 康萨如拉, 赵梦颖, 张庆, 任海娟, 任婧, 周俊梅, 王珍, 吴仁吉, 牛建明. 内蒙古羊草草原不同退化阶段土壤养分与植物功能性状的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(10): 991-1002. |
[13] | 詹书侠, 郑淑霞, 王扬, 白永飞. 羊草的地上-地下功能性状对氮磷施肥梯度的响应及关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 36-47. |
[14] | 刘慧, 陈薇, 周勇, 李夏, 任安芝, 高玉葆. 内生真菌和丛枝菌根真菌对羊草生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(5): 477-485. |
[15] | 李西良,侯向阳,吴新宏,萨茹拉,纪磊,陈海军,刘志英,丁勇. 草甸草原羊草茎叶功能性状对长期过度放牧的可塑性响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(5): 440-451. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19