植物生态学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 180-185.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.01.020
收稿日期:
2008-06-10
接受日期:
2008-08-28
出版日期:
2009-06-10
发布日期:
2009-01-30
通讯作者:
黄宏文
作者简介:
*E-mail: huanghw@mail.scbg.ac.cn基金资助:
DU Wei-Wei1, YAO Xiao-Hong1, HUANG Hong-Wen1,2,*()
Received:
2008-06-10
Accepted:
2008-08-28
Online:
2009-06-10
Published:
2009-01-30
Contact:
HUANG Hong-Wen
摘要:
雷公藤(Tripterygium wilfordii)是我国的名贵药用植物, 其药用成分雷公藤红素是医药研究中重要的化学单体。环境胁迫能促进药用植物次生代谢物质的合成与积累, 该文通过正交设计, 探讨了水分、光照、土壤氮含量三因素两水平轻度胁迫处理对雷公藤幼苗中雷公藤红素含量的影响。研究结果表明: 根部是雷公藤红素含量最丰富的部位; 雷公藤幼苗在水分、光照及土壤氮含量胁迫条件下根系中雷公藤红素的含量分别提高了10.8%、14.4%和13.0%, 光照对雷公藤红素含量的增加最明显, 短期的轻度胁迫可提高根中雷公藤红素的含量。
杜玮炜, 姚小洪, 黄宏文. 环境胁迫对雷公藤中雷公藤红素含量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(1): 180-185. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.01.020
DU Wei-Wei, YAO Xiao-Hong, HUANG Hong-Wen. EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSES ON CELASTROL CONTENTS IN TRIPTERYGIUM WILFORDII. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(1): 180-185. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.01.020
变异来源 Source | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 样本均方 Mean square | F值 F | 显著性 Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 2 116.893a | 8 | 264.612 | 2 111.155 | 0.000 |
l | 9.445 | 1 | 9.445 | 46.304 | 0.000 |
r | 6.875 | 1 | 6.875 | 33.704 | 0.000 |
n | 7.746 | 1 | 7.746 | 37.974 | 0.000 |
l×r | 1.482 | 1 | 1.482 | 11.822 | 0.002 |
l×n | 0.127 | 1 | 0.127 | 1.014 | 0.321 |
r×n | 1.475 | 1 | 1.475 | 11.769 | 0.002 |
l×r×n | 0.248 | 1 | 0.248 | 1.979 | 0.169 |
误差 Error | 4.011 | 32 | 0.125 | ||
总数 Total | 2 120.904 | 40 |
表1 不同胁迫处理对雷公藤红素含量影响的方差分析
Table 1 The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of between-subjects effects on content of Celastrol under different stress treatments
变异来源 Source | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 样本均方 Mean square | F值 F | 显著性 Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 2 116.893a | 8 | 264.612 | 2 111.155 | 0.000 |
l | 9.445 | 1 | 9.445 | 46.304 | 0.000 |
r | 6.875 | 1 | 6.875 | 33.704 | 0.000 |
n | 7.746 | 1 | 7.746 | 37.974 | 0.000 |
l×r | 1.482 | 1 | 1.482 | 11.822 | 0.002 |
l×n | 0.127 | 1 | 0.127 | 1.014 | 0.321 |
r×n | 1.475 | 1 | 1.475 | 11.769 | 0.002 |
l×r×n | 0.248 | 1 | 0.248 | 1.979 | 0.169 |
误差 Error | 4.011 | 32 | 0.125 | ||
总数 Total | 2 120.904 | 40 |
图2 不同胁迫条件下雷公藤中雷公藤红素含量图 L: 光照正常 Full sunlight l: 光照胁迫 Light tress R: 水分正常 Normal water r: 水分胁迫 Water stress N: N含量正常 Normal N content n: N含量胁迫 N content stress l×r×n: 光照胁迫、水分胁迫与N含量胁迫互作 Interaction among sunlight stress, water stress and N content stress l×r: 光照胁迫与水分胁迫互作 Interaction between sunlight stress and water stress l×n: 光照胁迫与N含量胁迫互作 Interaction between sunlight stress and N content stress r×n: 水分胁迫与N含量胁迫互作 Interaction between water stress and N content stress LRN: 对照 Control 柱子上的小写字母表示各处理间差异显著性 Small letters on the pillars indicate whether there exist significant differences between treatments
Fig. 2 The content of Celastrol in Tripterygium wilfordii under different stress conditions
图3 水分胁迫对雷公藤红素含量的影响 LN: 光照正常, 氮含量正常 Full sunlight and normal N content Ln: 光照正常, 氮含量胁迫 Full sunlight and N content stress lN: 光照胁迫与氮含量正常 Sunlight stress and normal N content ln: 光照胁迫与氮含量胁迫 Sunlight stress and N content stress 柱子上的小写字母表示各处理间差异显著性 Small letters on the pillars indicate whether there exist significant differences between treatments
Fig. 3 Effects of water stress on Celastrol content in Tripterygium wilfordii
图4 光照胁迫对雷公藤红素含量的影响 RN: 水分与氮含量皆正常 Normal water and N content Rn: 水分正常氮含量胁迫 Normal water and N content stress rN: 水分胁迫与氮含量正常 Water stress and normal N content rn: 水分胁迫与氮含量胁迫 Water stress and N content stress 柱子上的小写字母表示各处理间差异显著性 Small letters on the pillars indicate whether there exist significant differences between treatments
Fig. 4 Effects of light stress on Celastrol content in Tripterygium wilfordii
图5 土壤N含量胁迫对雷公藤中雷公藤红素含量的影响 LR: 光照与水分皆正常 Full sunlight and normal water Lr: 光照正常与水分胁迫 Full sunlight and water stress lR: 光照胁迫与水分正常 Sunlight stress and normal water lr: 光照胁迫与水分胁迫 Sunlight stress and water stress 柱子上的小写字母表示各处理间差异显著性 Small letters on the pillars indicate whether there exist significant differences between treatments
Fig. 5 Effects of N content stress in soil on the content of Celastrol in Tripterygium wilfordii
[1] |
Allison AC, Cacabelos R, Lombardi VR, Alvarez XA, Vigo C (2001). Celastrol, a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory drug, as a possible treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 25, 1341-1357.
DOI URL |
[2] |
Barto EK, Cipollini D (2005). Testing the optimal defense theory and the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Oecologia, 146, 169-175.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Bettina ED, Richard AD (2005). Metabolic engineering of isoflavonoid biosynthesis in alfalfa. Plant Physiology, 138, 2245-2259.
DOI URL PMID |
[4] | Coley PD, Brant JP, Chapin FS (1985). Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science, 230, 8952-8991. |
[5] |
Duan HQ, Takaishi Y, Momota H, Ohmoto Y (2000). Triterpenoids from Tripterygium wilfordii. Phytochemistry, 53, 805-810.
DOI URL PMID |
[6] |
Duan HQ, Takaishi Y, Momota H, Ohmoto Y, Taki T, Tori M, Takaoka S, Jia YF, Li D (2001). Immunosuppressive terpenoids from extracts of Tripterygium wilfordii. Tetrahedron, 57, 8413-8424.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Hamilton JG, Zangerl AR, Delucia EH, Berenbaum MR (2001). The carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis: its rise and fall. Ecology Letters, 4, 86-95.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Huang L, Feng SF, Wang HF (2000). Decreased bone mineral density in female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus after long-term administration of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. F. Chinese Medical Journal, 113, 159-161.
URL PMID |
[9] |
Josep P, Joan L (1997). Effects of carbon dioxide, water supply, and seasonally on terpene content and emission by Rosmarinus officinalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23, 979-993.
DOI URL |
[10] | Kong CH (孔垂华), Xu T (徐涛) (2000). Allelopathy under environmental stress and its induced mechanism. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 20, 849-854. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Liu ZJ (2000). Drought-induced in vivo synthesis of camptothecin in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum, 110, 483-488. |
[12] | Peng SL (彭少麟), Nan P (南蓬), Zhong Y (钟扬) (2002). Terpenoids in higher plants and their roles in ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 21, 33-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] |
Pinna GF, Fiorucci M, Reimund JM, Taquet N, Arondel Y, Muller CD (2004). Celastrol inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion in Crohn’s disease biopsies. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication, 322, 778-786.
DOI URL |
[14] | Su WH (苏文华), Zhang GF (张光飞), Li XH (李秀华), O XK (欧晓昆) (2005). Relationship between accumulation of secondary metabolism in medicinal plant and environmental condition. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs (中草药), 36, 1415-1418. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Xu YP (徐元萍), Zhang HW (章汉旺), Xiao FH (肖风华), Wang C (王成), Zhao L (赵琳) (2007). A study of the effectiveness and safeness of the antifertility action of triptolide in rats. Herald of Medicine (医药导报), 26, 594-596. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] |
Yang HJ, Chen D, Cui QZ, Yuan X, Dou QP (2006). Celastrol, a triterpene extracted from the Chinese “Thunder of God Vine” is a potent proteasome inhibitor and suppresses human prostate cancer growth in nude mice. Cancer Research, 66, 4758-4765.
DOI URL PMID |
[17] | Zheng CJ (郑承剑), Qin LP (秦路平) (2007). Three new sesquiterpene alkaloids tripfordine A―C from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. F. and their structure-activity relationship of Anti-HIV activities. World Phytomedicines (国外医药), 2, 265-265. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 邓蓓 王晓锋 廖君. 环境胁迫影响三峡库区消落带草本和木本植物生理生态特征的整合分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 623-637. |
[2] | 高敏, 缑倩倩, 王国华, 郭文婷, 张宇, 张妍. 低温胁迫对不同母树年龄柠条锦鸡儿种子萌发幼苗生理和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 201-214. |
[3] | 白雪, 李玉靖, 景秀清, 赵晓东, 畅莎莎, 荆韬羽, 刘晋汝, 赵鹏宇. 谷子及其根际土壤微生物群落对铬胁迫的响应机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 418-433. |
[4] | 刘建新, 刘瑞瑞, 刘秀丽, 贾海燕, 卜婷, 李娜. 外源硫化氢对盐碱胁迫下裸燕麦光合碳代谢的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 374-388. |
[5] | 陈图强, 徐贵青, 刘深思, 李彦. 干旱胁迫下梭梭水力性状调整与非结构性碳水化合物动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1407-1421. |
[6] | 叶洁泓, 于成龙, 卓少菲, 陈新兰, 杨科明, 文印, 刘慧. 木兰科植物叶片光合系统耐热性与叶片形态及温度生态位的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1432-1440. |
[7] | 周洁, 杨晓东, 王雅芸, 隆彦昕, 王妍, 李浡睿, 孙启兴, 孙楠. 梭梭和骆驼刺对干旱的适应策略差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1064-1076. |
[8] | 谢伟, 郝志鹏, 张莘, 陈保冬. 丛枝菌根网络介导的植物间信号交流研究进展及展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 493-515. |
[9] | 李思源, 张照鑫, 饶良懿. 桑苗非结构性碳水化合物和生长激素对水淹胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 311-320. |
[10] | 崔光帅, 罗天祥, 梁尔源, 张林. 干旱半干旱区灌丛对草本植物的促进作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1321-1333. |
[11] | 吴霖升, 张永光, 章钊颖, 张小康, 吴云飞. 日光诱导叶绿素荧光遥感及其在陆地生态系统监测中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(10): 1167-1199. |
[12] | 刘丽燕, 冯锦霞, 刘文鑫, 万贤崇. 干旱胁迫对转PtPIP2;8基因84K杨苗木光合、生长和根系结构的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 677-686. |
[13] | 邹显花, 胡亚楠, 韦丹, 陈思同, 吴鹏飞, 马祥庆. 磷高效利用杉木对低磷胁迫的适应性与内源激素的相关性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(2): 139-151. |
[14] | 王兆国, 王传宽. 碳供给与碳利用对树木生长的限制机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(12): 1036-1047. |
[15] | 张振振, 杨轲嘉, 顾宇璐, 赵平, 欧阳磊. 模拟降雨格局变化对亚热带地区两树种液流特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(11): 988-998. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19