植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 71-77.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0010
收稿日期:
2004-09-03
接受日期:
2005-03-15
出版日期:
2006-09-03
发布日期:
2006-01-30
通讯作者:
曹卫星
作者简介:
*E-mail:caow@njau.edu.cn基金资助:
FAN Xue-Mei, JIANG Dong DAI, DAI Ting-Bo, CAO Wei-Xing*()
Received:
2004-09-03
Accepted:
2005-03-15
Online:
2006-09-03
Published:
2006-01-30
Contact:
CAO Wei-Xing
摘要:
池栽试验条件下,设置渍水、干旱和对照3个水分处理,每个水分处理下设置两个施氮水平,研究了花后渍水或干旱逆境下氮素营养对两个不同类型小麦(Triticum aestivum)品种籽粒产量和品质性状的影响。结果表明,与对照相比,花后渍水或干旱处理显著降低了小麦的千粒重、穗粒数和籽粒产量。在适宜水分和干旱条件下,增施氮肥增加了小麦籽粒产量,而在渍水条件下,增施氮肥降低了产量。干旱处理提高了蛋白质含量,干、湿面筋含量,沉降值和降落值;而渍水处理则降低了小麦籽粒蛋白质含量和干、湿面筋含量。同一水分处理下,增施氮肥提高了蛋白质含量,谷蛋白/醇溶蛋白比,支链淀粉含量和支/直链淀粉比。在小麦籽粒主要品质性状上存在显著的水氮互作效应,且水分、氮肥及水氮互作效应对小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响因品种的不同而异。
范雪梅, 姜东, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 曹卫星. 花后干旱或渍水逆境下氮素对小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 71-77. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0010
FAN Xue-Mei, JIANG Dong DAI, DAI Ting-Bo, CAO Wei-Xing. EFFECTS OF NITROGEN ON GRAIN YIELD AND QUALITY IN WHEAT GROWN UNDER DROUGHT OR WATERLOGGING STRESS FROM ANTHESIS TO MATURITY. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(1): 71-77. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0010
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 千粒重 1 000-kernel weight (g) | 穗粒数 Kernel number per spike | 产量 Yield (g·m-2) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 54.3ab | 27.1bc | 557.3a | ||||||||||||||
Control | N120 | 56.5a | 29.2a | 540.0a | |||||||||||||||
渍水 | N240 | 45.9d | 28.2ab | 415.9bc | |||||||||||||||
Waterlogging | N120 | 47.3d | 26.9bc | 446.8b | |||||||||||||||
干旱 | N240 | 50.0c | 27.7ab | 409.7bc | |||||||||||||||
Drought | N120 | 52.1bc | 25.6c | 392.4c | |||||||||||||||
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 46.94** | 2.76 | 55.46** | |||||||||||||||
氮肥Nitrogen | 6.24** | 0.75 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 0.12 | 6.25** | 1.76 | ||||||||||||||||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 44.9a | 39.8a | 579.4a | ||||||||||||||
Control | N120 | 42.1b | 37.4ab | 541.6ab | |||||||||||||||
渍水 | N240 | 41.0b | 34.9bc | 500.5b | |||||||||||||||
Waterlogging | N120 | 41.8b | 34.6bc | 503.5b | |||||||||||||||
干旱 | N240 | 37.3d | 38.0ab | 455.7c | |||||||||||||||
Drought | N120 | 38.8c | 32.7c | 420.9c | |||||||||||||||
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 57.41** | 6.64** | 40.57** | |||||||||||||||
氮肥Nitrogen | 0.14 | 8.41** | 4.38* | ||||||||||||||||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 10.50** | 2.44 | 1.40 |
表1 花后干旱或渍水条件下氮素对两个小麦品种籽粒产量及产量构成因素的影响
Table 1 Effects of nitrogen on grain yield and yield components in two wheat cultivars grown under drought or waterlogging from anthesis to maturity
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 千粒重 1 000-kernel weight (g) | 穗粒数 Kernel number per spike | 产量 Yield (g·m-2) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 54.3ab | 27.1bc | 557.3a | ||||||||||||||
Control | N120 | 56.5a | 29.2a | 540.0a | |||||||||||||||
渍水 | N240 | 45.9d | 28.2ab | 415.9bc | |||||||||||||||
Waterlogging | N120 | 47.3d | 26.9bc | 446.8b | |||||||||||||||
干旱 | N240 | 50.0c | 27.7ab | 409.7bc | |||||||||||||||
Drought | N120 | 52.1bc | 25.6c | 392.4c | |||||||||||||||
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 46.94** | 2.76 | 55.46** | |||||||||||||||
氮肥Nitrogen | 6.24** | 0.75 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 0.12 | 6.25** | 1.76 | ||||||||||||||||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 44.9a | 39.8a | 579.4a | ||||||||||||||
Control | N120 | 42.1b | 37.4ab | 541.6ab | |||||||||||||||
渍水 | N240 | 41.0b | 34.9bc | 500.5b | |||||||||||||||
Waterlogging | N120 | 41.8b | 34.6bc | 503.5b | |||||||||||||||
干旱 | N240 | 37.3d | 38.0ab | 455.7c | |||||||||||||||
Drought | N120 | 38.8c | 32.7c | 420.9c | |||||||||||||||
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 57.41** | 6.64** | 40.57** | |||||||||||||||
氮肥Nitrogen | 0.14 | 8.41** | 4.38* | ||||||||||||||||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 10.50** | 2.44 | 1.40 |
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 蛋白质 Protein (%) | 清蛋白 Albumin (%) | 球蛋白 Globulin (%) | 醇溶蛋白 Gliadin (%) | 谷蛋白 Glutelin (%) | 谷蛋白/ 醇溶蛋白 Glu/Gli |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 15.1b | 1.79cd | 1.13a | 3.54a | 4.81c | 1.36cd |
Control | N120 | 14.3c | 2.15ab | 0.79b | 3.48a | 4.52c | 1.30d | |
渍水 | N240 | 14.1cd | 2.35a | 0.81b | 2.61d | 5.35b | 2.05a | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 13.8d | 1.63d | 0.67b | 2.81cd | 4.12d | 1.52c | |
干旱 | N240 | 15.9a | 2.05bc | 0.61b | 3.10ab | 5.77a | 1.86b | |
Drought | N120 | 15.6a | 1.85cd | 0.76b | 3.02bc | 5.64ab | 1.81b | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 57.30** | 0.09 | 8.63** | 29.43** | 49.46** | 49.42** | |
氮肥 Nitrogen | 10.12** | 6.72* | 3.85 | 0.18 | 33.56** | 13.20** | ||
水分×氮肥 Water×nitrogen | 1.25 | 19.45** | 6.51** | 2.28 | 12.77** | 18.24** | ||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 12.9a | 1.83ab | 0.74ab | 2.65b | 4.49b | 1.71ab |
Control | N120 | 11.3b | 1.79ab | 0.59b | 2.72b | 4.42b | 1.62ab | |
渍水 | N240 | 12.7a | 1.65b | 0.67ab | 2.64b | 4.57b | 1.73a | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 11.2b | 1.53b | 0.83a | 2.38b | 3.37c | 1.42b | |
干旱 | N240 | 13.6a | 2.14a | 0.72ab | 3.52a | 5.60a | 1.62ab | |
Drought | N120 | 13.2a | 1.75ab | 0.77ab | 3.70a | 5.76a | 1.57ab | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 11.26** | 3.62 | 1.57 | 55.82** | 61.57** | 0.53 | |
氮肥 Nitrogen | 18.07** | 2.94 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 7.98* | 3.96 | ||
水分×氮肥 Water×nitrogen | 1.80 | 0.95 | 3.63 | 2.06 | 10.48** | 1.21 |
表2 花后干旱或渍水条件下氮素对两个小麦品种籽粒蛋白质及其组分含量的影响
Table 2 Effects of nitrogen on contents of grain protein and protein components in two wheat cultivars grown under drought or waterlogging from anthesis to maturity
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 蛋白质 Protein (%) | 清蛋白 Albumin (%) | 球蛋白 Globulin (%) | 醇溶蛋白 Gliadin (%) | 谷蛋白 Glutelin (%) | 谷蛋白/ 醇溶蛋白 Glu/Gli |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 15.1b | 1.79cd | 1.13a | 3.54a | 4.81c | 1.36cd |
Control | N120 | 14.3c | 2.15ab | 0.79b | 3.48a | 4.52c | 1.30d | |
渍水 | N240 | 14.1cd | 2.35a | 0.81b | 2.61d | 5.35b | 2.05a | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 13.8d | 1.63d | 0.67b | 2.81cd | 4.12d | 1.52c | |
干旱 | N240 | 15.9a | 2.05bc | 0.61b | 3.10ab | 5.77a | 1.86b | |
Drought | N120 | 15.6a | 1.85cd | 0.76b | 3.02bc | 5.64ab | 1.81b | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 57.30** | 0.09 | 8.63** | 29.43** | 49.46** | 49.42** | |
氮肥 Nitrogen | 10.12** | 6.72* | 3.85 | 0.18 | 33.56** | 13.20** | ||
水分×氮肥 Water×nitrogen | 1.25 | 19.45** | 6.51** | 2.28 | 12.77** | 18.24** | ||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 12.9a | 1.83ab | 0.74ab | 2.65b | 4.49b | 1.71ab |
Control | N120 | 11.3b | 1.79ab | 0.59b | 2.72b | 4.42b | 1.62ab | |
渍水 | N240 | 12.7a | 1.65b | 0.67ab | 2.64b | 4.57b | 1.73a | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 11.2b | 1.53b | 0.83a | 2.38b | 3.37c | 1.42b | |
干旱 | N240 | 13.6a | 2.14a | 0.72ab | 3.52a | 5.60a | 1.62ab | |
Drought | N120 | 13.2a | 1.75ab | 0.77ab | 3.70a | 5.76a | 1.57ab | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 11.26** | 3.62 | 1.57 | 55.82** | 61.57** | 0.53 | |
氮肥 Nitrogen | 18.07** | 2.94 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 7.98* | 3.96 | ||
水分×氮肥 Water×nitrogen | 1.80 | 0.95 | 3.63 | 2.06 | 10.48** | 1.21 |
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 总淀粉 Total starch content (%) | 直链淀粉 Amylose content (%) | 支链淀粉 Amylopectin content (%) | 支/直链淀粉 Amylopectin/ Amylose |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 61.2a | 11.9cd | 49.3a | 4.20ab |
Control | N120 | 60.7ab | 12.9bc | 47.8ab | 3.70bc | |
渍水 | N240 | 57.8b | 12.9bc | 44.9bc | 3.51bc | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 60.3ab | 14.2ab | 46.1ab | 3.25cd | |
干旱 | N240 | 58.0b | 10.4d | 47.6ab | 4.66a | |
Drought | N120 | 57.8b | 15.9a | 41.9c | 2.65d | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 5.76* | 2.03 | 6.34* | 3.29 | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 0.68 | 31.12** | 4.65* | 26.41** | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 1.61 | 9.90** | 4.69* | 9.27** | ||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 61.0a | 14.6ab | 46.4c | 3.23b |
Control | N120 | 56.8b | 13.4bc | 43.6d | 3.83ab | |
渍水 | N240 | 62.2a | 11.7bc | 50.5a | 4.33ab | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 63.9a | 16.7a | 47.2bc | 3.00b | |
干旱 | N240 | 62.8a | 10.9c | 51.9a | 5.03a | |
Drought | N120 | 62.8a | 13.2bc | 49.5ab | 3.86ab | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 10.28** | 2.83 | 25.83** | 2.78 | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 1.00 | 6.67* | 18.09** | 3.39 | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 4.33* | 4.93* | 0.16 | 3.22 |
表3 花后干旱或渍水条件下氮素对两个小麦品种籽粒淀粉及其组分含量的影响
Table 3 Effects of nitrogen on contents of grain starch and starch components in two wheat cultivars grown under drought or waterlogging from anthesis to maturity
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 总淀粉 Total starch content (%) | 直链淀粉 Amylose content (%) | 支链淀粉 Amylopectin content (%) | 支/直链淀粉 Amylopectin/ Amylose |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 61.2a | 11.9cd | 49.3a | 4.20ab |
Control | N120 | 60.7ab | 12.9bc | 47.8ab | 3.70bc | |
渍水 | N240 | 57.8b | 12.9bc | 44.9bc | 3.51bc | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 60.3ab | 14.2ab | 46.1ab | 3.25cd | |
干旱 | N240 | 58.0b | 10.4d | 47.6ab | 4.66a | |
Drought | N120 | 57.8b | 15.9a | 41.9c | 2.65d | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 5.76* | 2.03 | 6.34* | 3.29 | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 0.68 | 31.12** | 4.65* | 26.41** | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 1.61 | 9.90** | 4.69* | 9.27** | ||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 61.0a | 14.6ab | 46.4c | 3.23b |
Control | N120 | 56.8b | 13.4bc | 43.6d | 3.83ab | |
渍水 | N240 | 62.2a | 11.7bc | 50.5a | 4.33ab | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 63.9a | 16.7a | 47.2bc | 3.00b | |
干旱 | N240 | 62.8a | 10.9c | 51.9a | 5.03a | |
Drought | N120 | 62.8a | 13.2bc | 49.5ab | 3.86ab | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 10.28** | 2.83 | 25.83** | 2.78 | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 1.00 | 6.67* | 18.09** | 3.39 | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 4.33* | 4.93* | 0.16 | 3.22 |
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 湿面筋 Wet gluten(%) | 干面筋 Dry gluten(%) | 面筋指数 Gluten index(%) | 沉降值 Sedimentation volume(ml) | 降落值 Falling number(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 54.0ab | 16.9a | 90.2a | 66.1b | 278.9b |
Control | N120 | 49.3c | 15.7b | 83.1b | 63.7c | 259.2bc | |
渍水 | N240 | 52.4bc | 16.2ab | 90.2a | 63.6c | 242.3c | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 49.0c | 15.1b | 90.0a | 63.5c | 242.5c | |
干旱 | N240 | 55.6ab | 17.1a | 91.6a | 67.1ab | 312.8a | |
Drought | N120 | 56.3a | 17.1a | 90.1a | 69.0a | 269.2b | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 12.68** | 5.62* | 1.84 | 16.22** | 22.39** | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 7.54* | 2.98 | 2.35 | 0.12 | 12.57** | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 3.10 | 7.08** | 1.22 | 3.45 | 4.54* | ||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 39.0b | 12.1b | 96.4abc | 57.0b | 317.0b |
Control | N120 | 37.3b | 12.0b | 95.6c | 56.5b | 312.7b | |
渍水 | N240 | 38.9b | 12.1b | 96.9abc | 54.7b | 367.5a | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 33.9b | 10.7c | 97.2ab | 52.5b | 323.0b | |
干旱 | N240 | 45.3a | 14.0a | 95.9bc | 66.0a | 363.2a | |
Drought | N120 | 39.1b | 12.5b | 97.7c | 66.2a | 357.8a | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 6.50** | 14.92** | 3.35 | 15.84** | 15.50** | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 10.1** | 8.66** | 1.55 | 0.12 | 7.01* | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 1.01 | 2.97 | 4.44* | 0.16 | 3.76* |
表4 花后干旱或渍水条件下氮素对两个小麦品种籽粒面粉品质的影响
Table 4 Effects of nitrogen on flour quality in two wheat cultivars grown under drought or waterlogging from anthesis to maturity
品种 Cultivar | 水分处理 Water treatment | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen level | 湿面筋 Wet gluten(%) | 干面筋 Dry gluten(%) | 面筋指数 Gluten index(%) | 沉降值 Sedimentation volume(ml) | 降落值 Falling number(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘徐州26’ `Xuzhou 26' | 对照 | N240 | 54.0ab | 16.9a | 90.2a | 66.1b | 278.9b |
Control | N120 | 49.3c | 15.7b | 83.1b | 63.7c | 259.2bc | |
渍水 | N240 | 52.4bc | 16.2ab | 90.2a | 63.6c | 242.3c | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 49.0c | 15.1b | 90.0a | 63.5c | 242.5c | |
干旱 | N240 | 55.6ab | 17.1a | 91.6a | 67.1ab | 312.8a | |
Drought | N120 | 56.3a | 17.1a | 90.1a | 69.0a | 269.2b | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 12.68** | 5.62* | 1.84 | 16.22** | 22.39** | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 7.54* | 2.98 | 2.35 | 0.12 | 12.57** | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 3.10 | 7.08** | 1.22 | 3.45 | 4.54* | ||
‘扬麦9号’ `Yangmai 9' | 对照 | N240 | 39.0b | 12.1b | 96.4abc | 57.0b | 317.0b |
Control | N120 | 37.3b | 12.0b | 95.6c | 56.5b | 312.7b | |
渍水 | N240 | 38.9b | 12.1b | 96.9abc | 54.7b | 367.5a | |
Waterlogging | N120 | 33.9b | 10.7c | 97.2ab | 52.5b | 323.0b | |
干旱 | N240 | 45.3a | 14.0a | 95.9bc | 66.0a | 363.2a | |
Drought | N120 | 39.1b | 12.5b | 97.7c | 66.2a | 357.8a | |
F-值 F-value | 水分Water | 6.50** | 14.92** | 3.35 | 15.84** | 15.50** | |
氮肥Nitrogen | 10.1** | 8.66** | 1.55 | 0.12 | 7.01* | ||
水分×氮肥Water×nitrogen | 1.01 | 2.97 | 4.44* | 0.16 | 3.76* |
[1] | Akiko S, Miwako K, Shingo N, Mitsuru W (1999). The effect of timing of nitrogen dressing on the baking quality of winter wheat. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 68,217-223. |
[2] | Ashraf M, Habib-ur- Rehman (1999). Interactive effects of nitrate and long-term waterlogging on growth, water relations, and gaseous exchange properties of maize ( Zea mays L.). Plant Science, 144,35-43. |
[3] | Cao GC (曹广才), Wang SZ (王绍中) (1994). Wheat Ecology of Quality (小麦品质生态). Chinese Science and Technology Press, Beijing,89-92. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Chang J (常江), Li JC (李金才) (1999). Study on influence of waterlogging on the effectiveness of nitrate, phosphorus and potassium to wheat nutrition. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 36,423-427. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Fan XM (范雪梅), Jiang D (姜东), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jing Q (荆奇), Cao WX (曹卫星) (2004). Effect of post-anthesis drought and waterlogging on grain quality formation in different quality wheat varieties. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28,680-685. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | He ZF (何照范) (1985). Analysis Technique for Grain Quality of Cereals and Oils (粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术). China Agriculture Press, Beijing,37-41. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Jenner CF, Ugalde TD, Aspinall D (1991). The physiology of starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 18,211-226. |
[8] | Jiang D (姜东), Xie ZJ (谢祝捷), Cao WX (曹卫星), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jing Q (荆奇) (2004). Effects of post-anthesis drought and waterlogging on photosynthetic characteristics, assmilates transportation in winter wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 30,175-182. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Jin K (金轲), Wang DS (汪德水), Cai DX (蔡典雄), Zhou Y (周涌) (1999). A study on the interactive effect and the model of water and fertilizer on dryland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 32(5),104-106. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Lan T (兰涛), Jiang D (姜东), Xie ZJ (谢祝捷), Cao WX (曹卫星), Dai TB (戴廷波), Jing Q (荆奇) (2004). Effects of post-anthesis drought and waterlogging on grains quality in different specialty wheat varieties. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 18,193-196. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Li YG (李永庚), Jiang GM (蒋高明), Yang JC (杨景成) (2003). Effects of temperature on carbon and nitrogen metabolism, yield and quality of wheat. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27,164-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Liu L (刘玲), Sha YZ (沙奕卓), Bai YM (白月明) (2003). Regional distribution of main agrometeorological disasters and disaster mitigation strategies in China. Journal of Natural Disasters (自然灾害学报), 12(2),92-97. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Luo C, Branlard G, Griffin WB, McNeil DL (2000). The effect of nitrogen and sulphur fertilisation and their interaction with genotype on wheat glutenins and quality parameters. Journal of Cereal Science, 31,185-194. |
[14] | Rharrabti Y, Royo C, Villegas D, Aparicio N, García del Moral LF (2003). Durum wheat quality in Mediterranean environments. I. Quality expression under different zones, latitudes and water regimes across Spain. Field Crops Research, 80,123~131. |
[15] | Shangguan ZP (上官周平), Liu WZ (刘文兆), Xu XB (徐宣斌) (1999). Interactive effects of water and fertilizer on yield of winter wheat in dry land. Research of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持研究), 6,103-106. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Wang CY (王晨阳), Ma DY (马冬云), Zhu YJ (朱云集), Guo TC (郭天财), Feng W (冯伟), Zhou SM (周苏玫) (2004). Effects of different irrigation and nitrogen application regimes in winter wheat on cooking qualities of Chinese noodle. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 37,256-262. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Wang LQ (王立秋), Jin ZZ (靳占忠), Cao JS (曹敬山) (1997a). A study on the water and fertilizer effect on spring wheat yield and quality. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 15,58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Wang LQ (王立秋), Jin ZZ (靳占忠), Cao JS (曹敬山), Wang ZY (王占宇) (1997b). Effects of water and fertilizer factors on grain quality and bread quality of wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 30(3),67-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Wang YF (王月福), Chen JH (陈建华), Qu JL (曲健磊), Li WF (李维峰), Zhou SL (周胜来) (2002a). Effects of soil water on grain yield and quality in winter wheat. Journal of Laiyang Agricultural College (莱阳农学院学报), 19(1),7-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Wang YF (王月福), Yu ZW (于振文), Li SX (李尚霞), Yu SL (余松烈) (2002b). Effects of nitrogen application amount on content of protein components and processing quality of wheat grain. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 35,1071-1078. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Xu ZZ (许振柱), Yu ZW (于振文), Wang D (王东), Zhang YL (张永丽) (2003). Effect of irrigation conditions on protein composition accumulation of grain and its quality in winter wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 29,682-687. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zhang BJ (张宝军), Jiang JY (蒋纪芸) (1995). Analysis on grain quality and effect factors in wheat. Agronomy Abroad—Wheat, Barley, Triticale, et al (国外农学——麦类作物), 4,29-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Zhao GC (赵广才), He ZH (何中虎), Liu LH (刘利华), Yang YS (杨玉双), Zhang Y (张艳), Li ZH (李振华), Zhang WB (张文彪) (2004). Study on the co-enhancing regulating effect of fertilization and watering on the main quality and yield in `Zhongyou9507' high gluten wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 37,351-356. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Zhu XK (朱新开), Guo WS (郭文善), Zhou JL (周君良), Hu H (胡宏), Zhang Y (张影), Li CY (李春燕), Feng CN (封超年), Peng YX (彭永欣) (2003). Effects of nitrogen on grain yield, nutritional quality and processing quality of wheat for different end uses. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 36,640-645. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 白皓然 侯盟 刘艳杰. 少花蒺藜草入侵与干旱对羊草草原生产力的影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 577-589. |
[2] | 韩路, 冯宇, 李沅楷, 王雨晴, 王海珍. 地下水埋深对灰胡杨叶片与土壤养分生态化学计量特征及其内稳态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 92-102. |
[3] | 吴瀚, 白洁, 李均力, 古丽•加帕尔, 包安明. 新疆地区植被覆盖度时空变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 41-55. |
[4] | 马常钦, 黄海龙, 彭政淋, 吴纯泽, 韦庆钰, 贾红涛, 卫星. 水曲柳雌雄株复叶类型及光合功能对不同生境的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1287-1297. |
[5] | 韩聪, 母艳梅, 查天山, 秦树高, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕. 2012-2016年宁夏盐池毛乌素沙地黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统通量观测数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1322-1332. |
[6] | 施梦娇, 李斌, 伊力塔, 刘美华. 美洲黑杨幼苗生长和生理生态指标对干旱-复水响应的性别差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1159-1170. |
[7] | 王晓悦, 许艺馨, 李春环, 余海龙, 黄菊莹. 长期降水量变化下荒漠草原植物生物量、多样性的变化及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 479-490. |
[8] | 余俊瑞, 万春燕, 朱师丹. 热带亚热带喀斯特森林木本植物的水力脆弱性分割[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1576-1584. |
[9] | 张志山, 韩高玲, 霍建强, 黄日辉, 薛书文. 固沙灌木柠条锦鸡儿和中间锦鸡儿木质部导水与叶片光合能力对土壤水分的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1422-1431. |
[10] | 陈图强, 徐贵青, 刘深思, 李彦. 干旱胁迫下梭梭水力性状调整与非结构性碳水化合物动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1407-1421. |
[11] | 李一丁, 桑清田, 张灏, 刘龙昌, 潘庆民, 王宇, 刘伟, 袁文平. 内蒙古半干旱地区空气和土壤加湿对幼龄樟子松生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1077-1085. |
[12] | 周洁, 杨晓东, 王雅芸, 隆彦昕, 王妍, 李浡睿, 孙启兴, 孙楠. 梭梭和骆驼刺对干旱的适应策略差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1064-1076. |
[13] | 王子龙, 胡斌, 包维楷, 李芳兰, 胡慧, 韦丹丹, 杨婷惠, 黎小娟. 西南干旱河谷植物群落组分生物量的纬度格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 539-551. |
[14] | 黄樱, 陈挚, 石喆, 熊博文, 鄢春华, 邱国玉. 蒸散发广义互补原理中关键参数αe的时空变化特征及计算方法分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 300-310. |
[15] | 熊淑萍, 曹文博, 曹锐, 张志勇, 付新露, 徐赛俊, 潘虎强, 王小纯, 马新明. 水平结构配置对冬小麦冠层垂直结构、微环境及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 188-196. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19