植物生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (预发表): 0-.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0381

• •    下一篇

毛刺锦鸡儿群落特征及分类

张坤, 伊丽晴, 刘占军, 张志杰, 王顼, 李明乐, 苗百岭, 张景慧, 李智勇, 董雷, 梁存柱   

  1. 内蒙古大学生态与环境学院, 内蒙古自治区 010030 中国
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-25 修回日期:2025-03-27 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-01-09

Characteristics and classification of Caragana tibetica community

ZHANG Kun, YI Li-Qing, liu zhanjun, ZHANG Zhi-Jie, WANG Xu, LI Ming-Le, MIAO Bai-Ling, ZHANG Jing-Hui, LI Zhi-Yong, DONG Lei, LIANG Cun-Zhu   

  1. , College of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University 010030, China
  • Received:2024-10-25 Revised:2025-03-27 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-01-09

摘要: 毛刺锦鸡儿(Caragana tibetica)群落是一种仅分布于亚洲中部地区, 处于荒漠草原地带向荒漠带过渡的植被类型。毛刺锦鸡儿群落在其分布区内有着特殊的生态价值, 然而目前对于其群落特征和分类的研究仍相对匮乏。该研究以内蒙古、青海和西藏调查的55个毛刺锦鸡儿样地数据为依据, 结合文献资料, 对毛刺锦鸡儿群落的物种组成、分布格局、群落特征与分类进行了分析。结果表明: (1)毛刺锦鸡儿群落共记录到142种植物, 分属35科82属, 物种组成以禾本科、豆科和菊科植物为主, 其中灌木、半灌木35种, 多年生草本72种, 一/二年生草本35种。(2)区系地理成分以戈壁-蒙古分布种为主(17.61%); 根据物种存在度等级划分, 其中Ⅰ级(0–20%)的物种有126种, 占物种总数的88.73%, 多为群落中的偶见种; 生活型以地面芽植物为主; 水分生态类型中, 旱生植物(50.00%)和强旱生植物(14.79%)占优势。(3)根据毛刺锦鸡儿群落物种的生活型和优势度将毛刺锦鸡儿群落分为毛刺锦鸡儿-禾草群丛组、毛刺锦鸡儿-葱类群丛组、毛刺锦鸡儿-杂类草群丛组、毛刺锦鸡儿+灌木-禾草群丛组、毛刺锦鸡儿+灌木-杂类草群丛组、毛刺锦鸡儿-半灌木-禾草群丛组、毛刺锦鸡儿-半灌木-葱类群丛组、毛刺锦鸡儿-半灌木-杂类草群丛组, 进一步划分为34个群丛。该研究对毛刺锦鸡儿群落分布、群落特征及其分类进行了研究, 为促进毛刺锦鸡儿植物资源的利用、分类与鉴别及其保护管理提供参考依据。

关键词: 毛刺锦鸡儿, 群落分类, 物种组成, TWINSPAN

Abstract: The Caragana tibetica community is a vegetation type distributed only in Central Asia region, in a transitional zone between desert steppe and desert. This community holds significant ecological value within its distribution area. However, research on its community characteristics and classification remains limited. Based on data from 55 plots surveyed across Nei Mongol, Qinghai, and Xizang, and combined with studies from books and literature, species composition, distribution pattern, community characteristics, and classification of C. tibetica community were analyzed. Results showed that (1) a total of 142 plant species were recorded in the C. tibetica community, belonging to 82 genera from 35 families. The community composition was dominated by Poaceae, Fabaceae, and Asteraceae, with 35 species of shrubs and subshrubs, 72 species of perennial herbs, and 35 species of annual or biennial herbs. (2) The floristic geographic elements were predominantly composed of species with a Gobi-Mongolian distribution (17.61%). Based on the degree of species presence, 126 species (88.73% of the total species) were classified as level I (0–20%), which were occasional species in the community. The life form was mainly composed of hemicryptophytes. In water ecological types, xerophytes (50%) and extreme xerophytes (14.79%) were dominated. (3) According to the life form and dominance of species, C. tibetica communities can be classified into 8 Association Groups: C. tibetica - Grass Association Group, C. tibetica + Allium Association Group, C. tibetica + Forb Association Group, C. tibetica + Shrubs - Grass Association Group, C. tibetica + Shrubs - Forb Association Group, C. tibetica - Subshrubs - Grass Association Group, C. tibetica - Subshrubs - Allium Association Group, and C. tibetica - Subshrubs - Forb Association Group. These Association Groups can be further divided into 34 Associations. The study of distribution, characteristics, and classification of C. tibetica communities can provide a reference for the plant resource utilization, classification, identification, and conservation management of C. tibetica.

Key words: Caragana tibetica, Community classification, Species composition, TWINSPAN